Skip to main content
OrthoVellumOrthopaedic Exam Prep
Pricing
About OrthoVellum
OrthoVellum
A living orthopaedic atlas

Exam-focused orthopaedic references, a question bank, viva practice, and spaced-repetition revision — with every clinical claim traceable to its source. Content is educational only and is not a substitute for local supervision, clinical judgement, or institutional policy.


Library

  • Clinical Topics
  • Blog
  • Site Updates
  • Content Methodology

Company

  • About Us
  • Authors & Disclosure
  • Editorial Team
  • Editorial Policy
  • Advertising Policy

Legal

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Medical Disclaimer
  • Copyright & DMCA

Support

  • Support OrthoVellum
  • Help Center
  • Contact
  • Accessibility
Evidence. Clarity. Practice.

© 2026 OrthoVellum. For educational purposes only.

Not medical advice. Verify clinically important information against current local guidance.

Perthes Containment Surgery (Femoral & Pelvic Osteotomy)

Operative SurgeryPaediatrics
PaediatricsIntermediateCore Procedure

Perthes Containment Surgery (Femoral & Pelvic Osteotomy)

Surgical technique guide for containment surgery in Legg-Calvé-Perthes disease - femoral varus osteotomy, Salter pelvic osteotomy, combined and salvage procedures, prognostic factors and the containment principle

Procedure console
22
Read
0
Sections
intermediate
Level
Peer-reviewed · 2026-06-20
High-yield overview

Femoral varus and/or Salter pelvic osteotomy to contain the deformable necrotic femoral head | intermediate

paedsSubspecialty
8yrKey Age Threshold
4Waldenstrom Stages
B/B-CBest-Responding Pillar
Critical Must-Knows
  • CONTAINMENT principle: keep the soft, plastic necrotic femoral head deeply seated within the acetabulum so it reossifies as a sphere — a 'ball in a mould'. The acetabulum acts as the mould only while the head is biologically plastic (initial/fragmentation stages).
  • AGE AT ONSET is the single most powerful prognostic factor — children older than 8 years (chronological age) at onset with lateral pillar B or B-C are the group shown by Herring to benefit most from surgical containment; younger children often do well without surgery.
  • Lateral pillar (Herring) grade and the 'head at risk' signs (Gage sign, lateral calcification, lateral subluxation, horizontal physis, metaphyseal cysts) guide the decision to operate — lateral pillar C does poorly regardless of treatment.
  • Containment is only effective EARLY — in the initial or fragmentation stage while the head is still mouldable and reducible. Once the head is healed/deformed or hinge abduction has developed, containment osteotomy is contraindicated and a salvage/realignment procedure is needed.

When & Why


The containment principle. During the necrosis and fragmentation stages of Legg-Calvé-Perthes disease, the femoral head is biologically plastic and deformable. If it is kept deeply seated within the spherical acetabulum, the acetabulum acts as a mould and the head reossifies as a sphere — the 'ball in a mould' concept. If the head is allowed to extrude or sublux laterally, it deforms into a non-spherical shape and becomes incongruent, leading to early osteoarthritis. The biological principle exploited by surgery is that the plastic head will remodel to the shape of whatever it is moulded against. The decision-making framework. The aim of all treatment is containment — keeping the femoral head within the acetabulum during the plastic phase so it remodels spherically and congruently. Not every Perthes hip needs surgery; the decision integrates age, lateral pillar grade, range of motion, and head-at-risk signs.

Containment principle in Perthes disease
Containment in Perthes: the softened, fragmenting femoral head is kept deeply seated within the acetabulum like a ball in a mould, so it reossifies into a spherical shape.Credit: OrthoVellum surgical illustration · OrthoVellum

Prognostic factors (decision drivers):

  • Age at onset — the single most important factor. In the Herring study no treatment effect was seen below a chronological age of 8 years (or a skeletal age of 6 years), so younger children usually do well non-operatively; children older than 8 years at onset remodel poorly and are more likely to benefit from surgery.
  • Lateral pillar grade — A (good regardless), B/B-C (benefits from surgery if older), C (poor regardless).
  • Head-at-risk signs — especially lateral subluxation — favour intervention.
  • Loss of containment / extrusion and progressive loss of abduction.
  • Hinge abduction — if present, varus containment is contraindicated. Non-operative containment — largely abandoned:
  • Abduction bracing / casting (e.g. Petrie casts, Scottish-Rite orthosis) was historically used to hold the hip abducted and contained.
  • High-quality evidence (including the Herring multicentre study) showed bracing is ineffective at altering outcome and is poorly tolerated — it is no longer recommended as a containment strategy.
  • Modern non-operative management focuses on symptomatic care: activity modification, physiotherapy to maintain range of motion (especially abduction and internal rotation), analgesia, and observation — appropriate for the younger child and lateral pillar A. Indications for surgical containment:
  • Best-supported indication — chronological age older than 8 years at onset with lateral pillar B or B/C — this is the group with demonstrated benefit from operative containment (femoral or pelvic osteotomy) in the Herring multicentre prospective study. (Wiig used a chronological-age threshold of 6 years with greater than 50% head necrosis to recommend femoral varus osteotomy.)
  • Progressive subluxation / extrusion of the head (head-at-risk signs) with loss of containment.
  • Failure to maintain containment with conservative measures in an at-risk hip.
  • Lateral pillar B/B-C in the early (initial/fragmentation) stage while the head is still reducible and congruent in abduction. Contraindications to containment (varus/Salter):
  • Healed or late reossification stage — head no longer plastic, deformity fixed.
  • Hinge abduction confirmed on dynamic arthrogram — abduction worsens congruity (needs valgus osteotomy or shelf).
  • Uncontainable head (markedly enlarged coxa magna that cannot be seated) — consider lateral shelf / Chiari salvage.
  • Stiff, incongruent hip with fixed deformity. Prerequisite assessment before surgery:
  • Dynamic arthrogram under anaesthesia — the key planning step. Confirms the head reduces and is congruent in abduction and internal rotation and excludes hinge abduction.
  • Restore range of motion first if the hip is stiff (traction, adductor release / physiotherapy) — a hip must abduct before it can be contained.
Age under 6 years at onset
Lateral pillar A
Observe — excellent
Lateral pillar B / B-C
Observe — usually good
Lateral pillar C
Guarded; observe, surgery limited benefit
Age 6-8 years at onset
Lateral pillar A
Observe
Lateral pillar B / B-C
Consider surgery if at-risk signs (Wiig: VO if greater than 50% necrosis)
Lateral pillar C
Poor regardless; symptomatic care
Age over 8 years at onset
Lateral pillar A
Observe
Lateral pillar B / B-C
SURGERY — clearest benefit
Lateral pillar C
Poor regardless; counsel realistically
Hinge abduction present
Lateral pillar A
N/A
Lateral pillar B / B-C
Varus contraindicated — valgus/shelf
Lateral pillar C
Salvage (shelf / Chiari)
Containment decision by age and lateral pillar (Herring study synthesis)
GroupLateral pillar ALateral pillar B / B-CLateral pillar C
Age under 6 years at onsetObserve — excellentObserve — usually goodGuarded; observe, surgery limited benefit
Age 6-8 years at onsetObserveConsider surgery if at-risk signs (Wiig: VO if greater than 50% necrosis)Poor regardless; symptomatic care
Age over 8 years at onsetObserveSURGERY — clearest benefitPoor regardless; counsel realistically
Hinge abduction presentN/AVarus contraindicated — valgus/shelfSalvage (shelf / Chiari)
Assess the lateral pillar in the fragmentation stage

The Herring lateral pillar classification (A / B / B-C / C) is the strongest radiographic predictor and is assessed in the FRAGMENTATION stage on the AP radiograph — not at presentation. Assessing it too early (initial stage) or too late (reossification) misgrades the hip and misdirects the decision to operate.

The Operation


The goal is to keep the deformable femoral head seated within the acetabular mould so it reossifies as a sphere. Containment can be achieved on the femoral side (redirect the head into the socket by reorienting the proximal femur), the pelvic side (redirect the acetabulum to cover the head), or both. Salvage procedures (shelf, Chiari) are used when the head is too large or uncontainable, or when hinge abduction is present. Every case is opened with a dynamic arthrogram under anaesthesia to confirm the head reduces and is congruent in abduction and to exclude hinge abduction before any bone is cut.

Perthes fragmentation with lateral pillar collapse
Perthes disease in the fragmentation stage: a flattened, sclerotic, fragmented epiphysis with lateral pillar collapse — the lateral pillar (Herring) grade drives prognosis and surgical decisions.Credit: OrthoVellum surgical illustration · OrthoVellum
Femoral versus pelvic containment osteotomy
Two containment operations: a proximal femoral varus osteotomy tilts the head into the socket, while a Salter pelvic osteotomy redirects the acetabulum over the head.Credit: OrthoVellum surgical illustration · OrthoVellum
Femoral varus (± derotation) osteotomy
Mechanism
Reorients proximal femur to seat the head deeper
Best indication
Older child, pillar B/B-C, good abduction, congruent in abduction
Key drawback
Limb shortening; relative trochanteric overgrowth; coxa vara if over-corrected
Salter innominate osteotomy
Mechanism
Redirects acetabulum to cover the anterolateral head
Best indication
Containment needed without wanting femoral shortening; anterolateral deficiency
Key drawback
Increases joint pressure; needs mobile, congruent hip; slight limb lengthening
Combined femoral + pelvic
Mechanism
Both reorientations for severe uncontainment
Best indication
Older child, severe extrusion, single redirection insufficient
Key drawback
Larger procedure; more morbidity; technically demanding
Shelf acetabuloplasty
Mechanism
Augments lateral coverage with a bone shelf
Best indication
Large head / older child / mild hinge; salvage of lateral deficiency
Key drawback
Non-anatomic; coverage by fibrocartilage not articular cartilage
Chiari osteotomy
Mechanism
Medialises hip, creates capsular interposition coverage
Best indication
Salvage of incongruent / uncontainable head
Key drawback
Non-anatomic; medialises joint; salvage only
Valgus (± extension) osteotomy
Mechanism
Moves congruent medial segment under the load; opens out hinge
Best indication
Hinge abduction — head congruent in adduction
Key drawback
Worsens abductor lever arm differently; for specific deformity only
Containment and salvage procedures compared
ProcedureMechanismBest indicationKey drawback
Femoral varus (± derotation) osteotomyReorients proximal femur to seat the head deeperOlder child, pillar B/B-C, good abduction, congruent in abductionLimb shortening; relative trochanteric overgrowth; coxa vara if over-corrected
Salter innominate osteotomyRedirects acetabulum to cover the anterolateral headContainment needed without wanting femoral shortening; anterolateral deficiencyIncreases joint pressure; needs mobile, congruent hip; slight limb lengthening
Combined femoral + pelvicBoth reorientations for severe uncontainmentOlder child, severe extrusion, single redirection insufficientLarger procedure; more morbidity; technically demanding
Shelf acetabuloplastyAugments lateral coverage with a bone shelfLarge head / older child / mild hinge; salvage of lateral deficiencyNon-anatomic; coverage by fibrocartilage not articular cartilage
Chiari osteotomyMedialises hip, creates capsular interposition coverageSalvage of incongruent / uncontainable headNon-anatomic; medialises joint; salvage only
Valgus (± extension) osteotomyMoves congruent medial segment under the load; opens out hingeHinge abduction — head congruent in adductionWorsens abductor lever arm differently; for specific deformity only

Femoral varus derotation osteotomy (VDRO) — the default containment operation

Step 1Position & setup
  • Supine on a radiolucent table with the image intensifier available throughout.
  • Position the whole femur so it can be imaged in AP and lateral without repositioning.
  • General anaesthesia; examine and document hip range of motion (abduction, internal rotation) before draping.
Step 2Exposure — lateral approach to the proximal femur
  • A straight lateral incision along the proximal femur, centred on the intended intertrochanteric/subtrochanteric osteotomy level.
  • Incise fascia lata in line; split vastus lateralis off the lateral intermuscular septum and retract it anteriorly to expose the lateral shaft and trochanteric region.
  • Stay subperiosteal on bone to protect the perforating branches of the profunda femoris as they pierce the septum.
Step 3Expose the osteotomy level and seat the implant
  • Clear the lateral cortex at the intertrochanteric/subtrochanteric region subperiosteally.
  • Insert the blade of a pre-contoured paediatric blade plate (or a proximal femoral locking plate) along the planned proximal-fragment trajectory, checked on the image intensifier, to set the neck-shaft angle.
Step 4Osteotomy and correction
  • Make the transverse intertrochanteric osteotomy below the greater trochanter.
  • Bring the distal fragment into varus (and derotate to neutralise excessive anteversion), seating the femoral head more deeply into the acetabulum and improving anterolateral cover.
  • Aim for a neck-shaft angle of about 105-110 degrees — enough varus to contain the head without producing a permanent Trendelenburg gait, which the older child cannot remodel.
Step 5Fixation
  • Secure the plate to the distal fragment; confirm reduction, correction and fixation on AP and lateral imaging.
  • Resect only a wedge sufficient to obtain bone contact and the desired varus without excessive shortening.
Step 6Closure and immobilisation
  • Layered closure over a drain.
  • Apply a hip spica or a protected-weight-bearing regime depending on fixation rigidity and the child's age; plate removal is commonly undertaken at 6-12 months once united.
Dangers — femoral varus osteotomy
  • Excessive varus — produces a persistent Trendelenburg gait and abductor weakness; the older child cannot remodel it. Limit to a neck-shaft angle around 105-110 degrees.
  • Limb-length discrepancy — varus and wedge resection shorten the limb; document and counsel; usually 1-2 cm and tolerated.
  • Relative trochanteric overgrowth — varus relatively elevates the greater trochanter, shortening the abductor lever arm.
Hinge abduction contraindicates a varus osteotomy

If the lateral head levers on the acetabular rim and the medial joint gaps open on abduction (hinge abduction), a varus or Salter containment procedure is contraindicated — both rely on the abducted position, which is precisely the incongruent position. Confirm congruity with a dynamic arthrogram in abduction BEFORE choosing varus. Hinge abduction is managed with a valgus osteotomy or shelf.

Varus shortens the limb; Salter lengthens it

Femoral varus osteotomy shortens the limb and can aggravate a Trendelenburg gait via relative trochanteric overgrowth. A Salter osteotomy lengthens the limb slightly and avoids femoral shortening — relevant to limb-length planning when choosing between the two.

Salter innominate (pelvic redirectional) osteotomy — the pelvic alternative

Step 1Position and exposure — anterior (Smith-Petersen / bikini) approach
  • Supine with a sandbag under the ipsilateral buttock.
  • Bikini incision from below the iliac crest toward the groin; expose the iliac wing subperiosteally down to the sciatic notch and the anterior inferior iliac spine (AIIS).
Step 2The osteotomy
  • A straight, complete cut through the innominate bone from the sciatic notch to the AIIS, just above the acetabulum.
  • Complete the cut fully to the notch so the distal fragment can hinge on the symphysis pubis; an incomplete posterior cut risks the sciatic nerve and gives an inadequate hinge.
Step 3Redirection and fixation
  • Rotate the distal fragment (bearing the acetabulum) anterolaterally to cover the extruded femoral head.
  • Hold the opened osteotomy with a tricortical iliac crest wedge graft and two threaded Kirschner wires across the osteotomy into the distal fragment.
Step 4Closure and immobilisation
  • Layered closure; image to confirm wire position and head cover.
  • Single hip spica for approximately 6 weeks, then mobilise; remove the threaded wires once healed.
Dangers — Salter osteotomy
  • Increased joint reaction force — redirection raises contact pressure; contraindicated in a stiff or incongruent hip.
  • Incomplete posterior osteotomy / sciatic notch — risk to the sciatic nerve and inadequate hinge; complete the cut to the notch.
  • Pin migration / graft displacement — secure two-pin fixation and protected weight-bearing.

Salvage and hinge-abduction procedures. When the head is too large to contain anatomically, or hinge abduction is present, containment is abandoned in favour of realignment or augmentation: a shelf acetabuloplasty augments lateral coverage of a large head with a bone shelf; a Chiari osteotomy medialises and salvages an incongruent/uncontainable hip by capsular metaplasia; and a valgus (± extension) osteotomy is the procedure of choice for hinge abduction, because the head is congruent in adduction — bringing that congruent medial portion under load relieves the hinge and improves abduction and gait.

Paediatric pelvic radiograph after Perthes containment osteotomy
Paediatric AP pelvic radiograph after femoral varus osteotomy for Perthes containment, the segment held with a plate.Credit: OrthoVellum surgical illustration

Aftercare & Complications


Post-operative care by procedure:

  • Femoral osteotomy — hip spica or protected weight-bearing depending on fixation rigidity; plate removal commonly at 6-12 months once united.
  • Salter osteotomy — single hip spica for approximately 6 weeks, then mobilise; remove threaded wires once healed.
  • Rehabilitation — regain abduction and internal rotation; physiotherapy; monitor for trochanteric overgrowth and leg-length discrepancy to maturity. Complications
Progressive AVN / head deformity despite surgery
Frequency / context
More common with lateral pillar C and older age
Recognition
Continued collapse and asphericity on serial radiographs; persistent stiffness
Prevention and management
Prevention: correct case selection (congruent, reducible, early stage); avoid containment in healed/hinge hips. Management: salvage realignment (valgus/shelf/Chiari) at maturity; counsel re eventual arthritis
Coxa magna
Frequency / context
Common natural sequela of LCPD
Recognition
Enlarged, broadened femoral head wider than the acetabulum on radiograph
Prevention and management
Prevention: early containment maintains sphericity. Management: usually tolerated if congruent; if uncontainable consider shelf augmentation
Coxa breva / short neck
Frequency / context
Physeal damage and premature growth arrest
Recognition
Short, broad femoral neck; high-riding greater trochanter on radiograph
Prevention and management
Prevention: minimise physeal insult. Management: trochanteric transfer/epiphysiodesis for relative overgrowth; neck-lengthening osteotomy in selected cases
Greater trochanteric overgrowth
Frequency / context
Relative overgrowth after early physeal arrest or excessive varus
Recognition
Abductor weakness, positive Trendelenburg, trochanter above centre of head
Prevention and management
Prevention: avoid excessive varus; consider greater trochanteric apophysiodesis in young child at risk. Management: distal/lateral trochanteric transfer to restore abductor lever arm
Limb-length discrepancy
Frequency / context
Femoral varus shortening, growth disturbance
Recognition
Measured/clinical leg-length difference; pelvic obliquity
Prevention and management
Prevention: limit varus/wedge resection; Salter avoids shortening. Management: shoe raise; contralateral epiphysiodesis timed to maturity if significant
Persistent Trendelenburg gait / abductor weakness
Frequency / context
Excessive varus or trochanteric overgrowth
Recognition
Abductor lurch, positive Trendelenburg test
Prevention and management
Prevention: neck-shaft angle around 105-110 degrees, not more varus. Management: abductor strengthening; trochanteric transfer if structural
Hip stiffness / loss of motion
Frequency / context
Pre-existing stiffness, prolonged immobilisation
Recognition
Reduced abduction and internal rotation post-op
Prevention and management
Prevention: restore motion before surgery; avoid over-immobilisation. Management: physiotherapy; rarely arthrolysis
Premature osteoarthritis
Frequency / context
Long-term outcome of aspherical incongruent hip (Stulberg IV-V)
Recognition
Pain, stiffness, joint space narrowing in young adulthood
Prevention and management
Prevention: achieve Stulberg I-III by good containment. Management: joint-preserving osteotomy in young adult; eventual arthroplasty
Implant / fixation problems (non-union, plate prominence, pin migration)
Frequency / context
Technique-dependent
Recognition
Pain, failure to unite, lateral hip prominence/bursitis
Prevention and management
Prevention: stable fixation, adequate bone contact. Management: implant removal once united; revision fixation/grafting for non-union
Complications — recognition, prevention, management
ComplicationFrequency / contextRecognitionPrevention and management
Progressive AVN / head deformity despite surgeryMore common with lateral pillar C and older ageContinued collapse and asphericity on serial radiographs; persistent stiffnessPrevention: correct case selection (congruent, reducible, early stage); avoid containment in healed/hinge hips. Management: salvage realignment (valgus/shelf/Chiari) at maturity; counsel re eventual arthritis
Coxa magnaCommon natural sequela of LCPDEnlarged, broadened femoral head wider than the acetabulum on radiographPrevention: early containment maintains sphericity. Management: usually tolerated if congruent; if uncontainable consider shelf augmentation
Coxa breva / short neckPhyseal damage and premature growth arrestShort, broad femoral neck; high-riding greater trochanter on radiographPrevention: minimise physeal insult. Management: trochanteric transfer/epiphysiodesis for relative overgrowth; neck-lengthening osteotomy in selected cases
Greater trochanteric overgrowthRelative overgrowth after early physeal arrest or excessive varusAbductor weakness, positive Trendelenburg, trochanter above centre of headPrevention: avoid excessive varus; consider greater trochanteric apophysiodesis in young child at risk. Management: distal/lateral trochanteric transfer to restore abductor lever arm
Limb-length discrepancyFemoral varus shortening, growth disturbanceMeasured/clinical leg-length difference; pelvic obliquityPrevention: limit varus/wedge resection; Salter avoids shortening. Management: shoe raise; contralateral epiphysiodesis timed to maturity if significant
Persistent Trendelenburg gait / abductor weaknessExcessive varus or trochanteric overgrowthAbductor lurch, positive Trendelenburg testPrevention: neck-shaft angle around 105-110 degrees, not more varus. Management: abductor strengthening; trochanteric transfer if structural
Hip stiffness / loss of motionPre-existing stiffness, prolonged immobilisationReduced abduction and internal rotation post-opPrevention: restore motion before surgery; avoid over-immobilisation. Management: physiotherapy; rarely arthrolysis
Premature osteoarthritisLong-term outcome of aspherical incongruent hip (Stulberg IV-V)Pain, stiffness, joint space narrowing in young adulthoodPrevention: achieve Stulberg I-III by good containment. Management: joint-preserving osteotomy in young adult; eventual arthroplasty
Implant / fixation problems (non-union, plate prominence, pin migration)Technique-dependentPain, failure to unite, lateral hip prominence/bursitisPrevention: stable fixation, adequate bone contact. Management: implant removal once united; revision fixation/grafting for non-union

Viva & Exam Focus


Mnemonic

C.O.N.T.A.I.NCONTAIN — principles of Perthes containment

C
Congruity confirmed
Dynamic arthrogram showing the head reduces and is congruent in abduction (exclude hinge abduction)
O
Older child
Chronological age older than 8 years at onset with lateral pillar B/B-C is the group with proven surgical benefit
N
Necrotic head plastic EARLY
Contain in the initial/fragmentation stage, never in the healed/deformed stage
T
The acetabulum is the mould
Deep seating allows spherical reossification (ball in a mould)
A
Abduction/internal rotation restored
Restore range and exclude hinge before committing to varus
I
Implant choice
Femoral (varus ± derotation) or pelvic (Salter) or combined — match to the deformity
N
No improvement in pillar C
Counsel realistically; salvage (shelf/Chiari) for large or uncontainable heads
Mnemonic

GLSHMGLSHM — Catterall head-at-risk signs

G
Gage sign
V-shaped radiolucency in the lateral epiphysis and adjacent metaphysis
L
Lateral calcification
Calcification of the epiphysis lateral to the lateral edge indicates extrusion
S
Subluxation
Lateral subluxation of the femoral head out of the acetabulum (most important sign)
H
Horizontal physis
The growth plate becomes horizontally oriented
M
Metaphyseal reaction
Diffuse metaphyseal lucency/cysts indicating extension of the process

Critical decision points and exam traps

Age at onset drives everything

The trap: treating all Perthes hips the same. Children under 6 years (skeletal age) have such good remodelling potential that most do well with symptomatic treatment alone. The fix: reserve surgical containment for the older child (chronological age older than 8 years at onset) with lateral pillar B/B-C. This is the group with proven benefit from the Herring multicentre study. Younger children rarely need surgery.

Timing within the disease stage

The trap: performing a containment osteotomy in the late reossification or healed stage. The head is no longer plastic and cannot remodel into the acetabular mould. The fix: containment is an EARLY-stage intervention (initial or fragmentation). The head must be reducible and congruent in abduction. Late deformity needs salvage, not containment.

Hinge abduction

Definition: an enlarged, deformed lateral head segment levers (hinges) on the lateral acetabular rim during abduction, causing lateral gapping medially and worsening congruity. Why it matters: a varus or Salter containment procedure relies on abduction to contain the head — in hinge abduction this is harmful. Confirm congruity with a dynamic arthrogram in abduction BEFORE choosing varus. Hinge abduction needs a valgus osteotomy or shelf.

Lateral pillar C — poor regardless

Evidence: in the Herring lateral pillar C group, outcomes are poor irrespective of operative or non-operative treatment, and across all age groups. Implication: do not promise that surgery will rescue a pillar C hip. Counsel realistically. The clearest surgical benefit is the older child with pillar B / B-C.

Head at risk signs

Catterall head-at-risk signs: Gage sign (V-shaped lucency lateral epiphysis/metaphysis), lateral calcification of the epiphysis, lateral subluxation of the head, horizontal physis, and diffuse metaphyseal reaction/cysts. Implication: presence of head-at-risk signs (especially lateral subluxation) shifts the balance towards containment surgery, particularly in the older child.

Perthes vs SCFE vs septic hip

Perthes: painless or mild limp, restricted abduction and internal rotation, child typically 4-8 years, afebrile, AVN of epiphysis on imaging. SCFE: older/heavier child (10-16 years), externally rotated limb, obligatory external rotation on hip flexion. Septic hip: febrile, refuses to weight-bear, raised CRP/WCC — an emergency requiring aspiration/washout, never an elective containment problem.

Clinical Decision Scenarios

Practise clinical reasoning and management decisions out loud

Viva scenarioStandard
Clinical prompt

“A 9-year-old boy presents with a 4-month history of a painless limp and reduced hip abduction. Radiographs show fragmentation of the right proximal femoral epiphysis with the lateral pillar reduced to about 40% of the contralateral height. How do you assess and manage him?”

Viva scenarioStandard
Clinical prompt

“What is the containment principle in Perthes disease, and how do femoral and pelvic osteotomies achieve it? When would you choose one over the other?”

Viva scenarioAdvanced
Clinical prompt

“During examination under anaesthesia and arthrography of an older child with Perthes, you find that the femoral head is congruent in adduction but levers on the lateral acetabular rim and gaps medially when you abduct the hip. What is this phenomenon, why does it contraindicate your planned varus osteotomy, and what would you do instead?”

Exam day cheat sheet
Perthes Containment Surgery — exam day summary

Disease and staging

  • LCPD = idiopathic AVN of the proximal femoral epiphysis; age 4-8 years, male predominance about 4-5:1, bilateral 10-15% (usually asynchronous)
  • Waldenstrom stages: 1 initial/necrosis, 2 fragmentation, 3 reossification, 4 remodelling/healed
  • Lateral pillar assessed in the FRAGMENTATION stage on AP radiograph
  • Synchronous symmetrical bilateral disease — screen for epiphyseal dysplasia / hypothyroidism

Classifications

  • Lateral pillar (Herring): A = no height loss (good); B = over 50% maintained; B/C border about 50%; C = under 50% (poor) — strongest radiographic predictor
  • Catterall I-IV = extent of epiphyseal involvement; source of head-at-risk signs
  • Catterall head-at-risk: Gage sign, lateral calcification, lateral subluxation, horizontal physis, metaphyseal cysts
  • Stulberg I-V (at maturity) predicts OA: I-II spherical congruent (good), III aspherical congruent (moderate), IV-V incongruent (high OA risk)

The containment principle

  • Keep the plastic necrotic head seated in the acetabular mould so it reossifies spherically — 'ball in a mould'
  • Effective ONLY in early (initial/fragmentation) stages while the head is plastic and reducible
  • Requires a head that reduces and is congruent in abduction — confirm on dynamic arthrogram
  • Goal is a Stulberg I-III (congruent) hip; avoid Stulberg IV-V incongruency

Indications for surgery

  • Best-supported: chronological age OVER 8 years at onset with lateral pillar B or B/C (Herring study); Wiig recommends femoral varus osteotomy over 6 years with greater than 50% head necrosis
  • Progressive subluxation/extrusion with head-at-risk signs
  • Lateral pillar A: observe (good regardless). Lateral pillar C: poor regardless — counsel realistically
  • Bracing/abduction casting is NO LONGER recommended — ineffective at altering outcome

Surgical options

  • Femoral varus derotation osteotomy: neck-shaft angle around 105-110 degrees; shortens limb; risk of trochanteric overgrowth/Trendelenburg
  • Salter innominate osteotomy: redirects acetabulum anterolaterally; slight limb lengthening; needs congruent mobile hip
  • Combined femoral + pelvic: severe extrusion when single redirection insufficient
  • Salvage: shelf acetabuloplasty (large head / lateral deficiency), Chiari (incongruent/uncontainable hip)
  • Valgus osteotomy: for HINGE ABDUCTION (head congruent in adduction)

Contraindications to containment (varus/Salter)

  • Healed / late reossification stage — head shape fixed
  • Hinge abduction confirmed on arthrogram — needs valgus or shelf instead
  • Uncontainable enlarged head (coxa magna) — consider shelf / Chiari
  • Stiff, incongruent hip with fixed deformity

Complications

  • Coxa magna, coxa breva/short neck, greater trochanteric overgrowth, limb-length discrepancy
  • Persistent Trendelenburg / abductor weakness — avoid excessive varus
  • Progressive AVN and head deformity (especially pillar C)
  • Premature osteoarthritis in aspherical incongruent (Stulberg IV-V) hips
  • Osteotomy non-union, implant prominence, pin migration

Key exam points

  • Age at onset is the single most powerful prognostic factor — older than 8 years (chronological) at onset does worse
  • Lateral pillar C does poorly regardless of treatment, all ages
  • ALWAYS do a dynamic arthrogram before containment — confirm reducibility/congruity and exclude hinge abduction
  • Hinge abduction = valgus osteotomy (head congruent in adduction), NOT varus
  • Salter lengthens the limb; femoral varus shortens it — relevant to limb-length planning

Background & Evidence


Epidemiology and pathoanatomy. Legg-Calvé-Perthes disease (LCPD) is an idiopathic avascular necrosis of the proximal femoral epiphysis in the growing child. Interruption of blood supply (predominantly via the lateral epiphyseal vessels of the medial femoral circumflex artery) leads to a self-limiting but staged sequence of necrosis, revascularisation, collapse, and repair. The vulnerable window is the period of necrosis and fragmentation, during which the softened, plastic epiphysis can deform under load. Typical age is 4-8 years with a male predominance of about 4-5:1; disease is bilateral in up to 10-15% (usually asynchronous — synchronous bilateral symmetrical disease should prompt consideration of epiphyseal dysplasia or hypothyroidism). Presentation is a painless or mildly painful limp, restricted abduction and internal rotation, and occasionally referred knee pain.

1
Name
Initial / necrosis
Radiographic features
Smaller, sclerotic epiphysis; medial joint space widening; subchondral fracture (crescent sign)
2
Name
Fragmentation
Radiographic features
Epiphysis fragments into segments; this is when the lateral pillar is assessed
3
Name
Reossification
Radiographic features
New bone fills the fragmented areas from medial to lateral
4
Name
Remodelling / healed
Radiographic features
Final head shape established; remodelling continues to skeletal maturity
Waldenstrom radiographic stages
StageNameRadiographic features
1Initial / necrosisSmaller, sclerotic epiphysis; medial joint space widening; subchondral fracture (crescent sign)
2FragmentationEpiphysis fragments into segments; this is when the lateral pillar is assessed
3ReossificationNew bone fills the fragmented areas from medial to lateral
4Remodelling / healedFinal head shape established; remodelling continues to skeletal maturity

Key timing principle: containment surgery is effective only in stages 1-2 while the head is plastic and reducible. By stages 3-4 the final shape is largely set.

A
Lateral pillar height
No loss of height
Prognosis
Good outcome regardless of treatment
B
Lateral pillar height
More than 50% height maintained
Prognosis
Outcome depends on age — benefits from containment if older
B/C border
Lateral pillar height
About 50%, narrow/poorly ossified
Prognosis
Intermediate; older children benefit from surgery
C
Lateral pillar height
Less than 50% height maintained
Prognosis
Poor outcome regardless of treatment
Lateral pillar (Herring) classification
GroupLateral pillar heightPrognosis
ANo loss of heightGood outcome regardless of treatment
BMore than 50% height maintainedOutcome depends on age — benefits from containment if older
B/C borderAbout 50%, narrow/poorly ossifiedIntermediate; older children benefit from surgery
CLess than 50% height maintainedPoor outcome regardless of treatment
Assessed on the AP radiograph in the fragmentation stage by the height of the lateral pillar (lateral 15-30% of the epiphysis) compared with the contralateral side. It is the strongest radiographic prognostic factor. Catterall classification. Based on the extent of epiphyseal involvement (4 groups: I = anterior only, II = anterolateral, III = most of epiphysis with small intact medial/posterior, IV = whole epiphysis). Less reproducible than lateral pillar and assessed retrospectively, but historically important and the source of the head-at-risk signs.

I
Description
Spherical head, normal
OA risk
Minimal
II
Description
Spherical head, with coxa magna/short neck/steep acetabulum
OA risk
Low
III
Description
Aspherical (ovoid) but congruent
OA risk
Moderate (late OA in middle age)
IV
Description
Flat head, congruent (flat acetabulum)
OA risk
Higher
V
Description
Flat head, incongruent
OA risk
Highest — early severe OA
Stulberg classification (outcome / sphericity-congruence)
ClassDescriptionOA risk
ISpherical head, normalMinimal
IISpherical head, with coxa magna/short neck/steep acetabulumLow
IIIAspherical (ovoid) but congruentModerate (late OA in middle age)
IVFlat head, congruent (flat acetabulum)Higher
VFlat head, incongruentHighest — early severe OA
Congruence matters more than absolute sphericity

The Stulberg classification predicts long-term osteoarthritis: Class I-II (spherical congruent) good, III (aspherical congruent) intermediate, IV-V (aspherical incongruent) high OA risk. A round head in a matching socket, or a flat head in a flat socket ('aspherical congruency'), both do better than an incongruent hip — so the goal of containment is a Stulberg I-III hip.

Determinants of outcome. The long-term outcome of Perthes is determined chiefly by the final shape and congruence of the femoral head (Stulberg class). Treatment aims to achieve a spherical or aspherical-congruent (Stulberg I-III) hip and to avoid an incongruent (IV-V) hip, which leads to early osteoarthritis. The most important prognostic factors are age at onset, lateral pillar grade, final head sphericity and congruence, head-at-risk signs (especially lateral subluxation/extrusion), and range of motion maintained throughout the disease. Femoral vs Salter — outcome comparison. Comparative series show no consistent difference in final sphericity or congruence (Stulberg outcome) between femoral and Salter osteotomy when the hip is congruent and reducible — both achieve containment. In the most-cited direct comparison (Kitakoji et al., 2005), the two procedures produced equivalent head sphericity and hip congruity, but the Salter group had a neck-shaft angle, acetabular coverage, and articular-trochanteric distance closer to normal, and avoided the surgical scarring and coxa vara seen after femoral osteotomy. Choice is guided by deformity pattern, surgeon experience, and limb-length considerations.

A
Under 8 years at onset
Good
Over 8 years at onset
Good
Treatment implication
No surgical benefit — observe
B
Under 8 years at onset
Good regardless
Over 8 years at onset
Better with surgery
Treatment implication
Operate if older than 8 years
B/C border
Under 8 years at onset
Generally good
Over 8 years at onset
Better with surgery
Treatment implication
Operate if older than 8 years
C
Under 8 years at onset
Poor regardless
Over 8 years at onset
Poor regardless
Treatment implication
Surgery does not reliably improve outcome
Outcome by age and lateral pillar (treatment effect)
Lateral pillarUnder 8 years at onsetOver 8 years at onsetTreatment implication
AGoodGoodNo surgical benefit — observe
BGood regardlessBetter with surgeryOperate if older than 8 years
B/C borderGenerally goodBetter with surgeryOperate if older than 8 years
CPoor regardlessPoor regardlessSurgery does not reliably improve outcome

Long-term and natural history. Many patients function well into adulthood; significant osteoarthritis typically presents in the 5th-6th decade, correlating with Stulberg class. Stulberg I-II carries minimal long-term OA risk; Stulberg III moderate OA in middle age; Stulberg IV-V a high risk of early, severe OA requiring joint-preserving osteotomy or arthroplasty. Counselling should be realistic: containment improves the odds of a congruent hip but cannot guarantee a normal hip, especially in older children and lateral pillar C.

References


Evidence

Legg-Calvé-Perthes disease. Part II: prospective multicenter study of the effect of treatment on outcome

Level II
Herring JA, Kim HT, Browne R • J Bone Joint Surg Am (2004)
Key Findings:
  • Large controlled prospective multicentre study — 438 patients, 451 hips, all aged 6.0-12.0 years at onset, none previously treated; 345 hips followed to skeletal maturity.
  • No difference in outcome between no treatment, bracing, and range-of-motion therapy — bracing confers no benefit.
  • No significant difference between femoral varus osteotomy and innominate (Salter) osteotomy.
  • In lateral pillar B and B/C-border hips in children OVER 8.0 years at onset, surgery gave significantly better outcomes than non-operative care (p less than or equal to 0.05).
  • Lateral pillar group (p less than 0.0001) and age at onset (p = 0.0001) were the two strongest prognostic factors; group C and group B under 8 years showed no treatment effect.
Clinical implication: Defines the modern indication for containment surgery: the older child (over 8 years at onset) with lateral pillar B or B/C border. It also retired routine bracing and showed femoral and pelvic osteotomy to be equivalent for containment.
Verify on PubMed (PMID 15466720)
Evidence

The lateral pillar classification of Legg-Calvé-Perthes disease

Level III
Herring JA, Neustadt JB, Williams JJ, Early JS, Browne RH • J Pediatr Orthop (1992)
Key Findings:
  • 93 hips in 86 patients classified during the fragmentation stage by lateral-pillar radiolucency and followed to maturity (Stulberg outcome).
  • Group A had a uniformly good outcome (100% Stulberg I-II).
  • Group B did well in children under 9 years at onset but poorly when older than 9 years; group C frequently became aspherical regardless of age.
  • Inter-observer agreement was 78%; the lateral pillar group was a stronger determinant of outcome than age at onset.
Clinical implication: Established the lateral pillar (Herring) classification as the strongest radiographic prognostic tool, assessable during the active fragmentation stage to guide containment decisions.
Verify on PubMed (PMID 1552014)
Evidence

The natural history of Legg-Calvé-Perthes disease

Level III
Stulberg SD, Cooperman DR, Wallensten R • J Bone Joint Surg Am (1981)
Key Findings:
  • Long-term follow-up (30-40 years) of two cohorts (88 and 68 patients) with radiographs from onset to maturity.
  • Defined five classes of residual deformity at maturity, each with a characteristic long-term course.
  • Spherical congruency (Class I-II) — no arthritis develops.
  • Aspherical congruency (Class III-IV) — mild-to-moderate arthritis in late adulthood.
  • Aspherical incongruency (Class V) — severe arthritis before age 50.
Clinical implication: Provides the outcome classification used to predict adult osteoarthritis; the aim of containment is a Stulberg I-III (congruent) hip, because congruence matters more than absolute sphericity.
Verify on PubMed (PMID 7276045)
Evidence

Prognostic factors and outcome of treatment in Perthes' disease: a prospective study of 368 patients with five-year follow-up

Level II
Wiig O, Terjesen T, Svenningsen S • J Bone Joint Surg Br (2008)
Key Findings:
  • Nationwide prospective study, 28 Norwegian hospitals, 368 unilateral cases, 97% follow-up at 5 years.
  • Strongest predictor of outcome was femoral-head involvement greater than 50% (OR 7.76), followed by age at diagnosis and lateral pillar group.
  • In children over 6 years at diagnosis with more than 50% head necrosis, proximal femoral varus osteotomy gave significantly better outcomes than orthosis or physiotherapy (p = 0.001).
  • No difference between physiotherapy and orthosis groups, and no treatment effect in children under 6 years; the authors concluded the abduction orthosis should be abandoned.
Clinical implication: Independently confirms the Herring findings in a national cohort — femoral varus osteotomy benefits the older, severely affected hip, while bracing should be abandoned.
Verify on PubMed (PMID 18827249)
Evidence

Which is a better method for Perthes' disease: femoral varus or Salter osteotomy?

Level IV
Kitakoji T, Hattori T, Kitoh H, Katoh M, Ishiguro N • Clin Orthop Relat Res (2005)
Key Findings:
  • Comparative series at skeletal maturity — 46 femoral varus osteotomies versus 30 Salter innominate osteotomies.
  • No significant difference in femoral-head sphericity or hip congruity between the two procedures.
  • Acetabular head coverage, neck-shaft angle, and articular-trochanteric distance were closer to normal after Salter osteotomy.
  • Femoral varus osteotomy left more residual coxa vara, trochanteric prominence, and surgical scarring.
Clinical implication: Both osteotomies contain the head equally well, but the Salter avoids the coxa vara and trochanteric sequelae of femoral shortening — supporting a pelvic procedure when limb-length and abductor mechanics are a concern.
Verify on PubMed (PMID 15662319)

Further reading:

  • Catterall A (1971). The natural history of Legg-Calvé-Perthes disease. J Bone Joint Surg Br 53(1):37-53. — Original Catterall classification and the head-at-risk signs guiding prognosis.
  • Salter RB (1984). The present status of surgical treatment for Legg-Perthes disease. J Bone Joint Surg Am. — Rationale and technique for innominate osteotomy as a containment procedure.
  • Joseph B, Nair NS, Narasimha Rao K, et al. Optimal timing for containment surgery for Perthes disease. J Pediatr Orthop. — Evidence that containment is effective only in the early (avascular/fragmentation) stages.
Editorially reviewed — transparent references and correction processPublished by OrthoVellum Medical Education TeamEditorial boardMethodologyReview policy
Educational disclosure

Educational content is reviewed for source visibility, editorial coherence, and correction readiness.

No individual clinician credential is claimed unless a named person is shown.

Verify before clinical use; this is not medical advice or a substitute for local guidance.

Procedure console
22
Read
0
Sections
intermediate
Level
Peer-reviewed · 2026-06-20
Procedure info
Level
intermediate
Read time
22
Updated
2026-06-20
Browse all procedures