Spine

Posterior Spinal Fusion and Instrumentation for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (PSF)

Surgical technique guide for Posterior Spinal Fusion and Instrumentation for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (PSF) - FRCS exam preparation

Core Procedure
advanced
By OrthoVellum Medical Education Team

Reviewed by OrthoVellum Editorial Team

Editorial maintenance, source checking, and correction workflow • Published by OrthoVellum Medical Education Team

High Yield Overview

POSTERIOR SPINAL FUSION AND INSTRUMENTATION FOR ADOLESCENT IDIOPATHIC SCOLIOSIS (PSF)

Posterior midline approach to thoracic and lumbar spine with subperiosteal exposure of laminae, facets, and transverse processes from instrumented levels. Selective fusion based on Lenke classification. | advanced

Critical Danger Structures - 5 SPECIFIC Anatomical Zones

Danger 1: SPINAL CORD

Location: Lies within spinal canal 15-25mm anterior to posterior lamina. Canal narrowest in mid-thoracic region (T4-T8) - cord diameter 8-10mm, canal AP diameter 12-15mm. Distance varies: cervical 15-20mm, thoracic 10-15mm (narrowest), lumbar 20-25mm from posterior elements.

Protection: Continuous neuromonitoring (SSEPs/MEPs). Anatomic pedicle screw trajectory (10-15° medial convergence, parallel to endplate). Four-wall pedicle palpation with ball-tip probe. Triggered EMG >8-10mA safe threshold. Limit distraction to <50% correction per maneuver. Wake-up test if signal changes. Avoid medial pedicle breach - CATASTROPHIC.

Danger 2: NERVE ROOTS

Location: Exit neural foramina inferior and lateral to pedicle. Distance from pedicle screw is 2-5mm inferiorly, 3-5mm laterally. L5 nerve root crosses L5 pedicle anterolaterally (most at risk with L5 pedicle screw).

Protection: Proper screw trajectory parallel to superior endplate (avoid inferior angulation). Triggered EMG threshold >8-10mA indicates safe distance (>2mm from nerve). Four-wall palpation confirms no inferior breach. Avoid aggressive superior facetectomy (exposes exiting nerve root). Preoperative CT to assess pedicle anatomy and foraminal stenosis.

Danger 3: SEGMENTAL VESSELS

Location: Segmental arteries and veins (branches of aorta/IVC) course along lateral and anterior vertebral body at mid-body level. Distance: 10-15mm lateral to lateral pedicle wall, 30-40mm anterior to posterior pedicle cortex. Aortic bifurcation at L4 level.

Protection: Proper screw length - measure on preoperative CT or intraoperative fluoroscopy, limit to 80% vertebral body depth (typically 30-35mm thoracic, 40-45mm lumbar). Limit lateral screw angulation (<15° from sagittal plane). AP and lateral fluoroscopy verify no anterior cortex breach. Bicortical purchase contraindicated in thoracic and upper lumbar (vascular risk).

Danger 4: DURA MATER

Location: Lies immediately deep to ligamentum flavum. Distance from posterior lamina: 2-5mm (minimal in thoracic spine where canal narrowest). Dural sac thickness 1-2mm. Thecal sac contains spinal cord and cauda equina in CSF.

Protection: Careful ligamentum flavum removal using Kerrison rongeurs - angle away from dura, start laterally and work medially. Palpate dura frequently with ball-tip probe. Angled curettes directed away from dura. If laminectomy required (rare in AIS), preserve posterior elements when possible. CSF leak repaired primarily with 4-0 or 5-0 Nurolon, consider fibrin glue and fascial graft if large tear.

Danger 5: PLEURA (Thoracic Exposure)

Location: Parietal pleura lies lateral to transverse processes in thoracic spine. Distance: 10-20mm lateral to transverse process tips (T1-T12). Right-sided pleura more at risk due to aorta on left pushing structures rightward.

Protection: Subperiosteal dissection to tips of transverse processes only - do not dissect lateral to TP tips. Avoid aggressive lateral retraction. If pleural tear recognized: repair primarily if accessible, place chest tube if significant pneumothorax, postoperative chest X-ray to confirm lung expansion. Small tears may seal spontaneously without intervention.

Mnemonic

SAFE PEDICLESAFE PEDICLE Screw Placement

Mnemonic

LENKELENKE Classification Selection

Indications

Absolute Indications

  • Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis with Cobb angle >45-50 degrees (surgical threshold per SRS guidelines)
  • Progressive curves despite orthotic management (>5 degrees documented progression over 6 months)
  • Skeletally mature patients (Risser 4-5) with curves >40 degrees and unacceptable deformity/trunk imbalance
  • Thoracic curves >50 degrees (high risk of progression in adulthood - natural history studies show 1° per year)
  • Symptomatic curves causing pain, respiratory compromise (rare in AIS), or psychosocial distress

Relative Indications

  • Thoracolumbar or lumbar curves >40-45 degrees with coronal imbalance (C7 plumb line >2cm from CSVL)
  • Double major curves with both thoracic and lumbar components >40 degrees
  • Curves 40-50 degrees in growing patients (Risser 0-3) with documented progression despite bracing
  • Curves with significant sagittal plane deformity (thoracic hypokyphosis or hyperkyphosis >50 degrees)

Contraindications

Absolute Contraindications

  • Active spinal infection (osteomyelitis, discitis, epidural abscess) - treat infection first
  • Uncontrolled medical comorbidities (severe cardiac/pulmonary disease preventing safe anesthesia)
  • Patient/family refusal after informed consent discussion of risks/benefits
  • Bleeding diathesis uncorrectable with medical management (severe hemophilia, platelet disorders)

Relative Contraindications

  • Severe osteopenia/osteoporosis (bone mineral density Z-score <-2.5) - poor screw purchase, consider cement augmentation
  • Malnutrition (albumin <3.5 g/dL, BMI <18.5) - optimize nutrition preoperatively for wound healing and fusion
  • Obesity (BMI >35) - increased infection risk, wound complications, technical difficulty
  • Psychiatric instability or unrealistic expectations - requires preoperative counseling and optimization
  • Age <10 years with open triradiate cartilage (crankshaft phenomenon risk) - consider anterior fusion or growth-friendly constructs
  • Neuromuscular etiology scoliosis (not true AIS) - different surgical considerations, higher complication rates

Major Complications - Recognition, Prevention, and Management

Exam Viva Scenarios

Practice these scenarios to excel in your viva examination

VIVA SCENARIOStandard

EXAMINER

"A 15-year-old female presents with a 55-degree right thoracic curve (T5-T12) and a 38-degree left lumbar curve (L1-L4). On right bending, the thoracic curve corrects to 35 degrees, and the lumbar curve corrects to 10 degrees. What is the Lenke classification, and what are your fusion levels?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
This is a Lenke 1C curve. Classification breakdown: **Curve Type 1** - Main Thoracic only (the thoracic curve is structural with 55° Cobb correcting to only 35° on bending = 20° correction = still >25° residual, therefore structural; the lumbar curve is flexible with 38° correcting to 10° = 28° correction, therefore non-structural). **Lumbar Modifier C** - I would need to see the standing PA radiograph to confirm, but with a 38-degree lumbar curve that is the compensatory curve, if the apex crosses the CSVL medially, this is a C modifier (if between pedicles and CSVL = A, if touching CSVL = B, if crossing medially = C). **Sagittal Modifier** - Would need to measure T5-T12 kyphosis: if <10° = minus, 10-40° = N, >40° = plus. **Fusion Levels**: For Lenke 1C, I must fuse the structural thoracic curve. UIV (upper instrumented vertebra) would be T3 or T4 (upper end vertebra of the thoracic curve, need to see radiographs to identify which vertebra is maximally tilted cephalad). LIV (lowest instrumented vertebra) is CRITICAL in Lenke 1C - because it's a C modifier, the lumbar apex crosses CSVL medially, indicating significant lumbar decompensation. I would fuse to L1 or L2 (the lower end vertebra of the thoracic curve), NOT into the lumbar curve. However, with a C modifier, there is risk of adding-on deformity if I stop too proximal. I would assess: 1) Disc wedging below proposed LIV (>3mm = risk factor), 2) Whether LIV is the stable vertebra (bisected by CSVL) or neutral vertebra. In a Lenke 1C, stopping at T12 or L1 is common, but some surgeons extend to L2 or L3 if those are the stable/neutral vertebra to prevent adding-on. The flexible lumbar curve should spontaneously correct once thoracic curve is corrected.
VIVA SCENARIOStandard

EXAMINER

"During pedicle screw placement at T7, the neuromonitoring team alerts you to a 60% drop in MEP amplitudes in the left lower extremity immediately after screw insertion. SSEPs are unchanged. What is your immediate management algorithm?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
This is a **neurological alarm** requiring immediate action. MEP drop of 60% exceeds our threshold (50%) and specifically affects motor pathways (corticospinal tract), while sensory pathways (SSEPs) are preserved, suggesting anterior cord injury or nerve root injury. **Immediate checklist (STOP surgical manipulation)**: 1) **Verify with anesthesia**: Check no new neuromuscular blockade given (MEPs abolished by paralytics - reversal with sugammadex if rocuronium), ensure adequate depth of anesthesia but not too deep (volatile >1 MAC suppresses MEPs - reduce if possible, prefer TIVA), check blood pressure adequate (MAP >65-70 mmHg minimum, increase to >85 mmHg if low - hypotension reduces spinal cord perfusion). 2) **Check monitoring equipment**: Ensure electrodes intact, no technical malfunction (have technician verify baseline parameters). 3) **Surgical checklist - most likely cause is the T7 pedicle screw I just placed**: **Immediate actions - Remove or reposition the T7 screw**: - Most likely the screw is malpositioned (medial breach into spinal canal compressing cord or lateral breach compressing nerve root) - REMOVE the T7 left pedicle screw completely - Palpate pedicle tract with ball-tip probe - check for medial wall breach (most dangerous - cord compression) - Reposition screw with more lateral trajectory if medial breach identified - If screw was in good position (four walls intact), consider screw too long (compressing cord anteriorly) - use shorter screw - Alternatively, ABANDON that screw - leave T7 left out of construct if cannot safely place **After screw removal - reassess neuromonitoring**: Give 5-10 minutes for signals to recover. If MEPs return to baseline (>80% of baseline amplitude), may proceed cautiously. If MEPs do NOT recover or worsen: **Stop surgery**, **Wake-up test** (reduce anesthesia, ask patient to move feet on command - if patient cannot move left foot = confirmed motor deficit, if patient CAN move = false alarm or resolved issue), Consider **abandoning remaining screws** and stopping procedure if wake-up test shows deficit, **Raise MAP** to >85 mmHg (increase spinal cord perfusion), Consider **high-dose steroids** per institutional protocol (methylprednisolone: 30mg/kg bolus, then 5.4mg/kg/hr x23h - controversial, may not help and has side effects, but some institutions still use). If wake-up test confirms deficit: **Abort procedure**, close wound, obtain **urgent MRI** postop to assess for cord compression, hematoma, or instrumentation malposition. May need urgent re-exploration and hardware removal if compressive lesion identified.
VIVA SCENARIOStandard

EXAMINER

"You are reviewing a 14-year-old male's 2-year postoperative radiographs after PSF T4-L2 for AIS. The original thoracic Cobb was 60 degrees, corrected to 25 degrees postop. Now at 2 years, the thoracic curve is 27 degrees (stable), but you notice a new 32-degree kyphotic angle from T2-T4 (preop T2-T4 was 15 degrees kyphosis). What complication has occurred, what are the risk factors, and how would you manage this patient?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
This patient has developed **Proximal Junctional Kyphosis (PJK)**, the most common long-term complication after PSF for AIS (incidence 10-30%). **Diagnosis**: PJK is defined as >10 degrees kyphosis between UIV (upper instrumented vertebra, T4 in this case) and two levels proximal (UIV+2 = T2), AND at least 10 degrees GREATER than the preoperative measurement. This patient has 32 degrees T2-T4 kyphosis vs 15 degrees preop = 17 degree increase, meeting both criteria. This is PJK. Need to distinguish from Proximal Junctional FAILURE (PJF) which involves fracture, ligamentous disruption, or neurological compromise - this patient has PJK without failure currently. **Risk Factors for PJK** (why this patient developed it): 1) **UIV selection at T4** - stopping at T4 may be in the apex of thoracic kyphosis, creating high stress concentration (UIV at kyphotic apex is highest risk for PJK). Ideally UIV should be at upper end vertebra or more proximal stable zone (T2-T3). 2) **Older age** - while 14 is young, skeletal maturity and bone quality matter (adolescents generally lower risk than adults). 3) **Amount of correction** - 60° to 25° is 58% correction, which is excellent but aggressive correction may increase PJK risk. 4) **Sagittal profile** - if this patient's thoracic kyphosis was under-corrected or lumbar lordosis over-corrected, this creates sagittal imbalance and increases stress at UIV. 5) **UIV level** - stopping in mid-thoracic (T4) vs upper thoracic (T2-T3) may have increased risk. 6) **Osteoporosis** - less likely in 14-year-old male but possible if underlying condition. **Management Algorithm**: **Step 1 - Assess symptoms**: Is the patient symptomatic? PJK can be asymptomatic (incidental finding) or symptomatic (proximal back pain, visible deformity, functional limitation). - If **asymptomatic**: Observation with serial radiographs q6-12 months. Many asymptomatic PJK cases stabilize and do not progress. No intervention needed if stable and asymptomatic. Activity modification (avoid heavy lifting, high-impact activities). - If **symptomatic** (proximal pain limiting function): Start with conservative management - physical therapy (core strengthening, postural training), NSAIDs, bracing (thoracic extension brace or TLSO), activity modification. Trial of conservative management for 3-6 months. **Step 2 - Assess progression**: Obtain standing PA and lateral radiographs now and at 6-month intervals. If PJK is progressive (increasing kyphotic angle >5-10 degrees per year) or develops proximal junctional FAILURE (fracture of UIV or UIV+1 vertebra, ligamentous disruption, severe pain, neurological compromise), then surgical intervention indicated. **Step 3 - Surgical decision**: Indications for revision surgery: 1) Symptomatic PJK failing conservative management (>3-6 months), 2) Progressive PJK (increasing deformity), 3) Proximal junctional failure, 4) Neurological compromise. **Revision Surgery** (if indicated): **Extend fusion proximally** - extend instrumentation 2-3 levels above original UIV (in this case, extend from T4 to T1 or T2). Correct kyphotic deformity at junctional area (may need osteotomies - Smith-Petersen osteotomies or Ponte osteotomies at junctional levels to restore alignment). Add bone graft for fusion. May consider adjunctive techniques: UIV+1 cement augmentation (in osteoporotic patients to prevent fracture), transverse process hooks at new UIV (load sharing, prevent hyperextension), tether proximal to UIV (limits extension). Ensure proper sagittal alignment globally. **This specific patient**: At 2 years postop, the 32-degree T2-T4 kyphosis is moderate PJK. I would: 1) Assess symptoms carefully (pain? functional limitation? cosmetic concern?). 2) Obtain full PA and lateral 36-inch radiographs to assess global alignment. 3) If asymptomatic - observation with radiographs at 6 months and 12 months to ensure stable. 4) If symptomatic - trial of conservative management (PT, NSAIDs, activity modification) x3-6 months. 5) Only proceed to revision if symptomatic failing conservative management, or if progressive on serial imaging.

Posterior Spinal Fusion for AIS - Exam Day Essentials

High-Yield Exam Summary

References

  1. Lenke LG, Betz RR, Harms J, et al. Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a new classification to determine extent of spinal arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001;83-A(8):1169-1181. PMID: 11507125. Landmark paper establishing Lenke classification system (curve type 1-6, lumbar modifier A/B/C, sagittal modifier) - gold standard for surgical planning in AIS, determines fusion levels based on structural curves identified on bending films.

  2. Suk SI, Kim WJ, Lee SM, Kim JH, Chung ER. Thoracic pedicle screw fixation in spinal deformities: are they really safe? Spine. 2001;26(18):2049-2057. PMID: 11547207. Pioneering study demonstrating safety and efficacy of thoracic pedicle screws in scoliosis correction - 4604 screws with 1.3% malposition rate, superior correction vs hook constructs, established pedicle screw instrumentation as standard of care.

  3. Diab M, Smith AR, Kuklo TR, Spinal Deformity Study Group. Neural complications in the surgical treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a review of 1594 patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89(11):2427-2432. PMID: 17974885. Large multicenter study of neurological complications in AIS surgery - 0.7% neurological deficit rate, most temporary and related to pedicle screw malposition or overcorrection, established importance of neuromonitoring and wake-up test.

  4. Nuwer MR, Dawson EG, Carlson LG, Kanim LE, Sherman JE. Somatosensory evoked potential spinal cord monitoring reduces neurologic deficits after scoliosis surgery: results of a large multicenter survey. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1995;96(1):6-11. PMID: 7530190. Landmark study demonstrating neuromonitoring (SSEPs) reduces permanent neurological injury from 1% to 0.1% in scoliosis surgery - established SSEPs as standard of care, alarm criteria >50% amplitude drop or >10% latency increase.

  5. Glassman SD, Bridwell K, Dimar JR, Horton W, Berven S, Schwab F. The impact of perioperative complications on clinical outcome in adult deformity surgery. Spine. 2007;32(24):2764-2770. PMID: 18007251. Analyzed impact of complications on outcomes in spinal deformity surgery - infection and neurological complications most devastating, emphasized importance of prevention strategies (prophylactic antibiotics, neuromonitoring, blood conservation).

  6. Kim YJ, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, Rhim S, Kim YW. Proximal junctional kyphosis in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis following segmental posterior spinal instrumentation and fusion: minimum 5-year follow-up. Spine. 2005;30(20):2045-2050. PMID: 16227885. Identified proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) as most common long-term complication (26% incidence at 5 years), defined as >10° kyphosis UIV to UIV+2 and >10° greater than preop, risk factors include UIV at kyphotic apex and overcorrection.

  7. Jain A, Sponseller PD, Shah SA, et al. Spontaneous lumbar curve correction in selective thoracic fusions of idiopathic scoliosis: a comparison of anterior and posterior approaches. Spine. 2012;37(12):1050-1057. PMID: 22108377. Demonstrated that flexible compensatory lumbar curves spontaneously correct after selective thoracic fusion in Lenke 1 curves - average 55% lumbar curve improvement without direct fusion, validated Lenke classification for fusion level selection.

  8. Verma K, Errico T, Diefenbach C, et al. The relative efficacy of antifibrinolytics in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a prospective randomized trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014;96(10):e80. PMID: 24875032. Prospective randomized trial demonstrating tranexamic acid (TXA) reduces blood loss 30-45% and transfusion rates in AIS surgery - TXA 10-15mg/kg load then 1mg/kg/hr infusion is now standard of care for blood conservation.

  9. Shufflebarger HL, Geck MJ, Clark CE. The posterior approach for lumbar and thoracolumbar adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: posterior shortening and pedicle screws. Spine. 2004;29(3):269-276. PMID: 14752348. Described posterior-only approach for thoracolumbar and lumbar AIS using pedicle screw fixation and concave compression technique - equivalent correction to anterior approach with less morbidity, established posterior approach as preferred technique.

  10. Helenius I, Remes V, Yrjönen T, et al. Comparison of long-term functional and radiologic outcomes after Harrington instrumentation and spondylodesis in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a review of 78 patients. Spine. 2002;27(2):176-180. PMID: 11805663. Long-term (average 21 years) outcomes after Harrington instrumentation for AIS - 80% good-excellent satisfaction despite residual deformity and loss of correction over time, fusion rates 95%, low revision rate, established that AIS surgery has durable long-term benefits for patient satisfaction and function despite loss of spinal motion.