Prone Position | Paracoccygeal Incision | Rectum Is the Critical Danger
- Prone on a radiolucent table with the hips slightly flexed to relax the gluteal mass and open the paracoccygeal corridor.
- Presacral (retrorectal) avascular plane - the loose areolar fat between the rectum (anterior) and the sacrum (posterior) is the safe dissection plane, identical to the plane exploited in rectal surgery.
- There is no true internervous plane - this is an avascular interfascial tissue plane, not an intermuscular plane between two nerve territories.
- The rectum is the critical danger - anterior perforation causes catastrophic pelvic contamination; the dissection is kept on the anterior sacral cortex under continuous fluoroscopy.
- Middle sacral vessels, the presacral venous plexus and the sacral nerve roots are the other key dangers, named per layer.
- The trajectory is transsacral - the guidewire docks on the anterior sacrum at S1-S2 and is driven cranially through S1, across the L5-S1 disc and into L5 to place the axial rod.
- Posterior percutaneous pedicle screw fixation is virtually always added at L5 and S1 to create a stable triangular construct.
When & Why
What it exposes. The presacral (AxiaLIF) approach is a minimally invasive, fluoroscopically guided, paracoccygeal route to the L5-S1 intervertebral disc. Through a small incision near the coccyx, blunt dissectors are passed into the presacral (retrorectal) avascular space and a guidewire is driven cranially along the anterior sacral cortex to dock at the S1-S2 junction, then advanced through S1, across the L5-S1 disc and into L5. Sequential dilators create a working channel for an axial discectomy and a threaded axial rod that spans and distracts L5-S1. Why this approach is chosen. The presacral axial approach reaches the L5-S1 disc without traversing the abdominal cavity (unlike an anterior lumbar interbody fusion, ALIF) and without stripping the posterior paraspinal muscles (unlike posterior or transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion, PLIF and TLIF). It exploits the embryologically avascular presacral space, so the corridor is bloodless if the correct plane is maintained and no muscle is divided. This preserves the paraspinal musculature and the dorsal musculoligamentous envelope, which is the theoretical advantage for a selected L5-S1 fusion. Indications. - Symptomatic L5-S1 degenerative disc disease with persistent mechanically provoked low back pain that has failed at least six months of structured non-operative care, in a carefully selected patient
- Low-grade isthmic or degenerative spondylolisthesis at L5-S1 (typically grade I and selected low-grade II) where reduction and interbody support are desired
- L5-S1 pseudoarthrosis or revision fusion where an anterior or posterior-only revision is unsuitable and an additional interbody option is needed
- Selected L5-S1 deformity correction where an axial interbody restore of disc height is an adjunct to posterior instrumentation
- Adjunct to a posterior fusion when an anterior column support at L5-S1 is wanted without an abdominal or extensive posterior exposure Contraindications. - Prior presacral, retroperitoneal or rectal surgery that has scarred or obliterated the avascular presacral plane
- Pelvic or perirectal sepsis, a perirectal abscess, a fistula-in-ano, or active inflammatory bowel disease involving the rectum
- Sacral anomalies such as sacral agenesis, a markedly kyphotic or curved sacrum, or severe sacral dysplasia that makes the transsacral trajectory impossible
- Transitional lumbosacral anatomy (sacralisation of L5 or lumbarisation of S1) that distorts the osseous landmarks
- Severe collapse of the L5-S1 disc that cannot be distracted by the axial rod
- Morbid obesity or bowel gas that prevents adequate biplanar fluoroscopy of the sacrum
- High-grade spondylolisthesis (relative) where reduction and anterior support cannot be safely achieved through a fixed axial trajectory
- Active perineal or sacral skin infection at the intended incision Pre-operative work-up. Weight-bearing anteroposterior and lateral lumbosacral radiographs (with flexion-extension views when instability or low-grade spondylolisthesis is suspected); a computed tomography scan to map the sacral anatomy, the sacral curvature, the anterior sacral foramina and the feasibility of a midline transsacral trajectory; magnetic resonance imaging to confirm L5-S1 disc pathology and to exclude a high-riding or abnormal rectum, a presacral mass, or presacral scarring. A pre-operative bowel preparation and, in many centres, a rectal tube or a water-soluble contrast-filled rectal marker balloon delineate the rectum on lateral fluoroscopy. Consent emphasises rectal injury, vascular injury, nerve injury and the need for supplementary posterior fixation.
| Option | Corridor | Key advantage | Key drawback |
|---|---|---|---|
| Presacral AxiaLIF | Paracoccygeal, presacral, transsacral | No muscle division, no abdominal entry | Rectum at risk, limited to L5-S1, needs posterior fixation |
| ALIF | Anterior abdominal | Large cage, good disc-height restore | Great vessels, hypogastric plexus, abdominal approach |
| TLIF | Posterior, unilateral | Avoids the abdomen, unilateral | Paraspinal muscle stripping, foraminal work |
| PLIF | Posterior, bilateral | Bilateral disc access | Greater canal and nerve-root retraction |
| XLIF / OLIF | Lateral transpsoas | Large cage mid-lumbar | Difficult at L5-S1 due to crest and plexus |
Position & landmarks. Place the patient prone on a radiolucent table with chest and pelvic bolsters, padding all pressure points and protecting the face, eyes and brachial plexus. Flex the hips slightly using a hip roll or table hip-flexion to relax the gluteal mass and open the paracoccygeal corridor. Prep the perineum and natal cleft into the sterile field, because the incision lies in the paracoccygeal skin and access to the anal margin may be needed to place a rectal marker. Before draping, confirm a true anteroposterior and a true lateral view of the sacrum and lumbosacral junction with the C-arm, rotating until the sacrum is seen en face on AP and the posterior elements are superimposed on lateral. Palpable and radiographic landmarks are the tip of the coccyx and sacrococcygeal joint, the posterior superior iliac spines and sacral hiatus, the anterior sacral cortex (the smooth concave cortical line to hug on lateral fluoroscopy), the L5-S1 disc and L5 body (the target), and the paired sacral foramina (which the trajectory must run exactly between on AP).
The Exposure
Work cranially through the avascular presacral plane, hugging the anterior sacral cortex under continuous biplanar fluoroscopy, then drive the transsacral trajectory into L5-S1, prepare the disc, deploy the axial rod and supplement it with posterior pedicle screws.
Intra-operative lateral fluoroscopic image of the presacral (AxiaLIF) approach: the patient prone, a guidewire and working cannula tracked along the anterior sacral cortex from a paracoccygeal entry near the coccyx, docking at the S1-S2 junction and crossing the L5-S1 disc into the L5 vertebral body, with a rectal marker delineating the rectum anteriorly.
Context: A verified image is being sourced for this exposure.
Exposure sequence
- Mark a small paracoccygeal incision of about one and a half to two centimetres near the tip of the coccyx, on the side chosen on pre-operative imaging to give the straightest path to the mid-sacral body.
- Deepen bluntly through subcutaneous fat to the anococcygeal ligament and gently open it to enter the presacral (retrorectal) space, confirming entry into loose avascular fat anterior to the sacrum.
- The perineum is already in the field, and a rectal marker is in place so the rectum is visible throughout.
- Pass a blunt-tipped guidewire or probe cranially along the anterior sacral cortex, sweeping it gently within the avascular retrorectal fat.
- On the lateral view confirm the wire stays on bone and does not lift off into the rectum; on the AP view confirm it is midline, running exactly between the paired sacral foramina.
- The plane is identical to the embryologic cleavage plane of a mesorectal (rectal) dissection, and it is avascular when the correct plane is maintained.
- Dock the guidewire on the anterior sacral cortex at the S1-S2 junction (the mid-sacrum) - the point where the sacral curvature allows a straight cephalad line to L5.
- Re-confirm midline position between the foramina on AP and an intrasegmental course on lateral before committing to the transsacral trajectory.
- Drive the wire in a cephalad direction through the S1 vertebral body, across the S1 endplate, across the L5-S1 disc and into the L5 vertebral body, maintaining midline position on AP throughout.
- Pass sequential dilators over the guidewire to create a working channel through the sacrum and disc, confirming each dilator on both views before advancing.
- Establish a working cannula that seats against the L5-S1 disc, through which the disc-preparation instruments are passed.
- Through the axial working channel perform an axial discectomy with long curettes, reamers and brushes to remove nucleus and endplate cartilage from the L5-S1 disc.
- Preserve the peripheral annulus - it is the tension band the axial rod will distract against.
- Place bone graft material (autograft, allograft or a bone-graft substitute) into the prepared disc space and confirm placement on fluoroscopy.
- Measure over a trial and select the appropriately sized threaded axial rod (typically titanium alloy, or PEEK in some systems).
- Advance and deploy the rod across L5-S1 so that it spans S1 and L5, engaging the thread in both bodies and distracting the disc space to restore height.
- Confirm rod position, depth and the restored disc height on AP and lateral fluoroscopy.
- Because the axial rod alone is biomechanically insufficient, add bilateral percutaneous pedicle screws at L5 and S1 through separate stab incisions in the same prone position.
- Connect the screws with percutaneous rods to create a stable triangular (anterior-axial plus posterior-pedicle) construct.
- Confirm final hardware position and alignment on intra-operative fluoroscopy before closing.
The hallmark of the presacral approach is that it does not pass through muscle at all. The corridor runs through the embryologically avascular presacral (retrorectal) space, the same cleavage plane developed during a total mesorectal excision. There is therefore no classical internervous plane between two muscle groups supplied by different nerves - the safety of the approach comes entirely from staying in this avascular fascial plane, on the anterior sacral cortex, away from the rectum and the midline vessels. If asked for the internervous plane, the correct answer is that there is none; it is an avascular interfascial plane. This is a frequently tested distinction and a common trap.
The rectum is never directly seen during a presacral AxiaLIF, and anterior perforation causes catastrophic pelvic contamination, sepsis and fistula formation. It is protected by three measures working together: blunt dissection that develops the avascular plane so the rectum falls away anteriorly; keeping every instrument on the anterior sacral cortex so nothing is driven into the rectum; and continuous biplanar fluoroscopy with a rectal marker that shows where the rectum lies. The combination is what makes the approach safe, and the absence of any one of these is how the rectum is injured.
Dangers & Extensions
Structures at risk, by layer
| Layer | Structure at risk | Protection |
|---|---|---|
| Anterior (the critical danger) | Rectum - anterior perforation causes catastrophic pelvic sepsis | Bluntly develop the avascular plane; keep every instrument on the anterior sacral cortex; continuous biplanar fluoroscopy; rectal marker |
| Midline vessels | Middle sacral artery and vein and the presacral venous plexus (Batson's) - brisk venous bleeding | Develop the plane on bone; keep the midline vessels clear of the working channel; tamponade and haemostatic agents for venous ooze |
| Lateral (within the sacral body) | Sacral nerve roots S1 to S4 via the anterior sacral foramina | Keep the drill strictly midline between the foramina; pre-operative CT mapping; midline fluoroscopic trajectory |
| Across the disc and L5 | Superior hypogastric (autonomic) plexus - retrograde ejaculation, sexual dysfunction | Counsell pre-operatively; minimise thermal/mechanical trauma around the disc and L5 body |
| Anterior escape | Common iliac vessels, bowel and pelvic viscera | Continuous lateral fluoroscopy confirming depth and trajectory of every instrument |
| Local / incision | Coccyx, anococcygeal structures and perineal skin - coccygodynia, painful scar | Small incision, careful midline-to-paramedian placement, meticulous closure of the moist natal-cleft skin |
Extensibility - deliberately limited. Proximally, the transsacral trajectory can be extended from S1 across L5-S1 into L4-L5 to place a longer two-level axial rod spanning L4 to S1; this is the limit of the approach and suits only a minority with favourable anatomy. Distally, the approach ends at the paracoccygeal skin incision and cannot be extended beyond the perineum. The fixed axial geometry of the sacrum confines the approach to the lumbosacral junction - it is not a general lumbar exposure and cannot be redirected to higher lumbar levels. This limited extensibility is one of the principal drawbacks and a recognised examination point. Closure. Achieve haemostasis in the presacral space and at the incision with tamponade and haemostatic agents for any presacral venous ooze; the space is left to collapse around the tract. Close the small paracoccygeal incision in layers - a deep fascial stitch to the anococcygeal tissues, then a subcuticular skin closure or interrupted skin sutures. A drain is not usually required because the avascular plane and the small tract rarely accumulate a significant collection. Close the separate percutaneous pedicle screw stab incisions with single skin sutures or skin glue, and apply a sterile dressing with care for the moist environment of the natal cleft. Early mobilisation is possible because no muscle was stripped.
A suspected or confirmed rectal perforation is a surgical emergency that overrides every other consideration. The axial procedure is abandoned, the rectum is repaired by a colorectal surgeon (or defunctioned with a stoma if the injury is large or contaminated), the presacral space is washed out and drained, broad-spectrum antibiotics are commenced, and the L5-S1 fusion is deferred or converted to a posterior-only construct at a planned second stage. Recognising the injury intra-operatively - suggested by an unexpected loss of guidewire contact with the sacrum, gas or faecal material in the wound, or an unstable guidewire position - is essential, because an unrecognised perforation leads to devastating pelvic sepsis.
Procedures Through This Approach
| Procedure | Level(s) | Key technical point |
|---|---|---|
| One-level AxiaLIF | L5-S1 | Transsacral axial rod across L5-S1, always with posterior pedicle screws |
| Two-level AxiaLIF | L4-L5 and L5-S1 | Longer axial rod from S1 into L4, for selected two-level disease |
| Fusion for degenerative disc disease | L5-S1 | For carefully selected, mechanically provoked low back pain |
| Fusion for low-grade spondylolisthesis | L5-S1 | Grade I and selected low-grade II isthmic or degenerative |
| Revision or pseudoarthrosis surgery | L5-S1 | As an additional interbody option when other routes are unsuitable |
Fixation principles and the supplemented construct. The axial rod provides anterior column support and disc-height restoration but is not a standalone fixation device; it is always used as one limb of a construct. Bilateral percutaneous pedicle screws at L5 and S1 form the posterior limb, producing a triangulated construct that resists flexion, extension and rotation. Some surgeons add a facet screw or an iliac bolt when sacral fixation is tenuous or the construct is long. Bone graft is placed both in the prepared disc space and, where used, as a posterolateral onlay, to achieve a solid arthrodesis. Always describe the supplementary posterior percutaneous pedicle screw construct - axial fusion alone is insufficient.
Viva & Exam Focus
PRESACRALPRESACRAL - how the approach is built
DANGERDANGER - what to protect in the presacral plane
Clinical Decision Scenarios
Practise clinical reasoning and management decisions out loud
“A 42-year-old with intractable, mechanically provoked low back pain and imaging-confirmed L5-S1 degenerative disc disease, who has failed six months of non-operative care, is offered a presacral axial lumbar interbody fusion. Describe your surgical approach.”
“During advancement of the guidewire up the presacral plane, you notice the wire lifts off the anterior sacral cortex on the lateral view, the rectal marker appears indented, and there is an unexpected smell of bowel gas. How do you assess and manage this?”
“A 50-year-old with low-grade degenerative spondylolisthesis at L5-S1 and persistent symptoms is being considered for fusion. What are the indications for the presacral AxiaLIF approach, and how does it compare with the alternatives?”
Position and landmarks
- Prone on a radiolucent table with the hips slightly flexed to relax the gluteals
- Perineum and natal cleft prepped into the field; a rectal marker is placed
- Confirm true AP and lateral fluoroscopy of the sacrum before draping
- Small paracoccygeal incision of about one and a half to two centimetres near the coccyx
- Landmarks: coccyx tip, sacrococcygeal joint, anterior sacral cortex, L5-S1 disc
The avascular presacral plane
- There is NO true internervous plane - it is an avascular interfascial tissue plane
- The presacral (retrorectal) space lies between the rectum anteriorly and the sacrum posteriorly
- The same embryologic cleavage plane developed in rectal (mesorectal) surgery
- Safety comes from staying on the anterior sacral cortex and in the avascular fat
- No muscle is divided at any point in the approach
Structures at risk (per layer)
- Rectum - the catastrophic danger; anterior perforation causes pelvic sepsis
- Middle sacral artery and vein and the presacral venous plexus - brisk venous bleeding
- Sacral nerve roots S1 to S4 - injured by a lateral breach into a foramen
- Superior hypogastric plexus - retrograde ejaculation and sexual dysfunction
- Abdominal and pelvic viscera - endangered by an anterior escape of the drill
The transsacral trajectory
- Guidewire kept on the anterior sacral cortex, midline between the foramina, under biplanar fluoroscopy
- Dock on the anterior sacral face at the S1-S2 junction
- Drive cephalad through S1, across the S1 endplate, across L5-S1, into L5
- Sequential dilators create the working channel; axial discectomy preserves the annulus
- A threaded axial rod spans S1 and L5 and restores disc height
Procedures and fixation
- One-level AxiaLIF at L5-S1 is the standard procedure
- Two-level AxiaLIF to L4-S1 is possible in selected anatomy
- Indicated for L5-S1 degenerative disc disease and low-grade spondylolisthesis
- The axial rod is ALWAYS supplemented with bilateral percutaneous L5 and S1 pedicle screws
- Extensibility is limited - it cannot reach higher lumbar levels
Closure and rectal-injury emergency
- Haemostasis of presacral venous ooze with tamponade and haemostatic agents
- Layered closure of the small paracoccygeal incision; a drain is rarely needed
- Early mobilisation is possible because no muscle was stripped
- Radiographs at six weeks, three months and six to twelve months to assess fusion
- A suspected rectal injury is an emergency: abandon, involve colorectal surgery, repair or defunction
References
Guidelines, Registries & Global Practice Lumbosacral interbody fusion is performed worldwide, and the principles converge across examination systems (advanced orthopaedic practice and advanced orthopaedic practice, DNB and MS, MRCS, SICOT). The presacral (AxiaLIF) approach is a recognised minimally invasive option that is particularly discussed in the context of L5-S1 fusion where avoidance of both the abdomen and posterior muscle stripping is desired. Weight-bearing radiographs, computed tomography mapping of the sacrum and the sacral foramina, and magnetic resonance imaging to exclude a presacral abnormality are near-universal before the approach is offered, and the emphasis on protecting the rectum, the presacral vessels and the sacral roots with biplanar fluoroscopy is shared by every group that uses it. Side-by-side principles (where guidance converges): | Body | Position on L5-S1 interbody fusion and the presacral approach |
|------|----------------------------------------------------------------| | AO Foundation and spine trauma and deformity consensus | An anterior column support at L5-S1 improves fusion mechanics; the chosen corridor (anterior, posterior or axial) is dictated by anatomy, previous surgery and the structures at risk | | NICE and national health-technology bodies | Minimally invasive axial fusion is an option for selected L5-S1 disease, with the explicit caveat that long-term comparative evidence is limited and that serious bowel and vascular complications, although uncommon, are well described | | AAOS and international spine societies | Interbody fusion at L5-S1 should be reserved for defined indications after conservative care has failed; the approach is chosen to minimise approach-related morbidity while respecting the dangers specific to that corridor | Population and outcome evidence: - Early clinical series of the presacral approach reported low intra-operative blood loss and short hospital stays, attributed to the muscle-sparing, avascular-plane corridor.
- Reported fusion rates vary widely across series, and concerns about pseudoarthrosis and about rare but serious bowel and vascular complications have tempered early enthusiasm.
- Comparative studies against transforaminal and anterior lumbar interbody fusion generally show similar medium-term fusion but differences in blood loss and length of stay, with the rectum being a danger unique to the presacral route. Global practice variation. In high-resource settings, intra-operative three-dimensional fluoroscopy or navigation is used to confirm the transsacral trajectory, and percutaneous pedicle screw supplementation is routine. In resource-limited settings the same L5-S1 pathology is more often managed with a posterior or transforaminal approach, because the presacral technique depends on specialised implants and reliable biplanar imaging that may not be available. Consent (globally applicable): discuss rectal injury (rare but catastrophic), injury to the middle sacral vessels and presacral venous plexus with bleeding, sacral nerve-root injury, retrograde ejaculation or sexual dysfunction, pseudoarthrosis and the need for revision surgery, adjacent-segment degeneration, and the obligatory addition of posterior pedicle screw fixation.
For the Operative Surgery station you must describe the presacral AxiaLIF approach systematically: prone positioning with biplanar fluoroscopy and a rectal marker, the small paracoccygeal incision and blunt development of the avascular presacral (retrorectal) plane (with the explicit point that there is no internervous plane), the S1-S2 transsacral trajectory into L5-S1, the structures at risk named by layer (rectum, middle sacral vessels and presacral plexus, sacral roots, autonomic plexus), the always-supplemented posterior pedicle screw construct, and the closure.
New Less-Invasive Axial Lumbar Interbody Fusion (AxiaLIF)
- The original cadaveric and early clinical description of the paracoccygeal, presacral, transsacral approach to the L5-S1 disc
- Defined the avascular presacral (retrorectal) corridor between the rectum and the sacrum and the transsacral trajectory for an axial implant
- Established the technical feasibility of reaching L5-S1 without traversing the abdomen or stripping the posterior paraspinal muscles
Early Clinical Outcomes of Axial Lumbar Interbody Fusion at L5-S1
- Reported the early clinical experience of axial lumbar interbody fusion at L5-S1 with posterior pedicle screw supplementation
- Found low intra-operative blood loss and short hospital stay consistent with the muscle-sparing, avascular-plane corridor
- Highlighted the importance of careful patient selection and of supplementing the axial rod with posterior fixation
Minimally Invasive Axial Lumbar Interbody Fusion Compared with Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion
- Compared the presacral axial approach with a conventional posterior lumbar interbody fusion at the lumbosacral junction
- Found reduced estimated blood loss and a shorter hospital stay in the axial cohort, with comparable early fusion in selected patients
- Underlined that serious approach-specific complications, although uncommon, can occur with the presacral route
Clinical Outcome and Complications of Axial Lumbar Interbody Fusion
- Reported a clinical series of axial lumbar interbody fusion with prospective follow-up of pain and function
- Demonstrated meaningful improvement in back pain and disability scores in suitably selected patients
- Documented the recognised complications of the approach, including presacral bleeding and the rare but serious risk of rectal injury
Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Axial Lumbar Interbody Fusion
- Systematic review pooling the reported fusion rates and complications of the presacral axial approach across published series
- Concluded that fusion outcomes are broadly comparable to other L5-S1 interbody techniques in selected patients
- Emphasised the need for high-quality comparative evidence and careful counselling on the uncommon but serious bowel and vascular complications