Patellar Resurfacing in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty

ArthroplastyAdvancedCore Procedure

Patellar Resurfacing in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty

Operative technique guide for patellar resurfacing during primary TKA — indications and evidence for routine versus selective resurfacing, native thickness measurement, composite thickness restoration, medialised inset or onlay button, patellar tracking assessment with no-thumb test, and management of complications including fracture, AVN, clunk and loosening

High-yield overview

Decision-making and technique for patellar resurfacing during primary total knee arthroplasty | advanced

Surgical Imaging

Critical Danger Structures and Exam Traps
Overstuffing the Patellofemoral Joint

The trap: Resecting too little bone or choosing an overly thick button so that composite thickness exceeds native thickness by greater than 2 mm.

The fix: Measure native thickness before resection. Plan resection depth so that bone plus button restores original thickness within 1 mm. Overstuffing increases patellofemoral contact forces, accelerates polyethylene wear, and is a leading cause of persistent anterior knee pain.

Asymmetric Patellar Resection

Location: The patella must be cut perpendicular to its long axis; the medial and lateral facets must have equal residual bone thickness.

Risk: A thick medial facet and thin lateral facet produces lateral tilt, increases lateral retinacular tension, and leads to maltracking or component loosening. Always check symmetry with callipers after the cut.

Patellar Thickness Less Than 12 mm

Location: Thin native patella (common in small patients or after prior surgery).

Risk: Resurfacing leaves inadequate bone stock (less than 12 mm residual) and markedly raises fracture risk. In these cases selective non-resurfacing or a thin inset button may be safer; document the decision.

Patellar AVN and Fracture

Why different: The patellar blood supply enters from the periphery via the prepatellar anastomosis; aggressive medial and lateral releases or thermal damage from saw can devascularise the bone.

Implications: AVN presents as sclerosis and collapse 6-24 months post-operatively; fracture risk is highest when residual thickness is less than 12 mm. Preserve at least one geniculate vessel when possible and avoid excessive peripheral stripping.

Patellar Clunk Syndrome

Mechanism: A fibrous nodule or synovial proliferation at the superior pole of the patella catches in the intercondylar notch or on the anterior flange of the femoral component during extension from 30-40 degrees of flexion.

Implications: Classic presentation is a painful audible clunk between 30 and 40 degrees of flexion. Prevention: smooth the superior patellar pole, ensure adequate femoral component sizing and rotation, and consider synovial excision at the superior pole.

Component Loosening versus Maltracking

De Quervain's vs Trigger vs Dupuytren's: Patellar button loosening presents with activity-related pain and a radiolucent line greater than 2 mm on the bone-cement interface. Maltracking produces lateral tilt or subluxation visible on sunrise views and is usually due to component malrotation or asymmetric resection rather than true loosening.

Mnemonic

R.E.S.U.R.F.A.C.E.RESURFACE — Decision Framework

Mnemonic

T.R.A.C.K.TRACK — Patellar Tracking Assessment

Decision to Resurface — Evidence Overview

Routine versus Selective versus Never Resurfacing

The patellar resurfacing debate centres on whether all primary TKAs should receive a patellar button, whether only selected patients should be resurfaced, or whether the patella should be left unresurfaced in all cases.

Routine resurfacing (resurface every primary TKA):

  • Reduces anterior knee pain at 5-10 years in multiple meta-analyses
  • Lowers reoperation rate for patellofemoral problems
  • Supported by registry trends in Australia, UK and Scandinavia where resurfacing rates exceed 80 percent

Selective resurfacing (resurface when specific criteria met):

  • Pre-operative anterior knee pain
  • Inflammatory arthritis (rheumatoid, psoriatic)
  • Patellar cartilage loss greater than grade 3 or eburnated bone
  • Patellar maltracking or tilt on pre-operative imaging
  • Patient age less than 60 years or high-demand activity

Never resurfacing (leave all patellae unresurfaced):

  • Higher rates of anterior knee pain and secondary resurfacing procedures
  • Registry data show reoperation rates for patellofemoral pain are 2-4 times higher when the patella is not resurfaced
  • Still practised in some centres with careful patient selection and meticulous technique

Evidence Summary

Meta-analyses consistently show that resurfacing reduces anterior knee pain and reoperation compared with non-resurfacing, but the absolute difference is modest (approximately 5-10 percent absolute risk reduction). Inflammatory arthritis is the clearest indication for resurfacing. In osteoarthritis the decision remains surgeon preference with patient counselling.

Resurfacing versus Non-Resurfacing — Key Outcomes


Key Evidence

Evidence

Patellar resurfacing versus non-resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis

Level I
Pilling R, Moulder E, Allgar V, et al.J Bone Joint Surg Br
Evidence

Patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Level I
Chen K, Li G, Fu D, et al.Knee
Evidence

The effect of patellar resurfacing on anterior knee pain and function after total knee arthroplasty

Level II
Barrack RL, Bertot AJ, Wolfe MW, et al.J Bone Joint Surg Am
Evidence

Patellar resurfacing in inflammatory arthritis: long-term results

Level III
Stern SH, Insall JNClin Orthop Relat Res
Evidence

Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry — Annual Report

Level IV
AOANJRRAOANJRR Annual Report

Clinical Decision Scenarios

Practise clinical reasoning and management decisions out loud

Viva scenarioAdvanced
Clinical prompt

A 68-year-old woman with rheumatoid arthritis is scheduled for primary TKA. Pre-operative sunrise views show grade 4 patellar cartilage loss. She has moderate anterior knee pain climbing stairs. What is your plan for the patella and why?

Practical approach
In a patient with rheumatoid arthritis and grade 4 patellar cartilage loss I would resurface the patella. Inflammatory arthritis destroys the native cartilage and the synovium produces inflammatory mediators that cause persistent anterior knee pain when the patella is left unresurfaced. Registry and cohort data show that non-resurfaced inflammatory knees have a 20-25 percent rate of secondary resurfacing for anterior knee pain. **Pre-operative planning**: Measure native patellar thickness on CT or calibrated radiographs. Plan to restore composite thickness within 1 mm of native. Choose a cemented all-polyethylene button sized to fit without overhang and medialised 2-3 mm. **Intra-operative steps**: After medial parapatellar exposure, evert the patella and remove all osteophytes. Measure native thickness with callipers. Use the resection guide to remove bone so that residual thickness plus button equals native thickness. Confirm even medial and lateral residual bone. Cement the button after pulsatile lavage. Perform the no-thumb test after trialling components and release the lateral retinaculum only if tracking is poor despite correct rotation. **Post-operative**: Standard TKA protocol with emphasis on quadriceps strengthening. Counsel the patient that anterior knee pain may persist for 6-12 months but is expected to improve with time and strengthening.
Viva scenarioAdvanced
Clinical prompt

During primary TKA on a 72-year-old man with osteoarthritis you measure native patellar thickness at 19 mm. After resection the residual bone is 11 mm. What do you do and why?

Practical approach
A residual bone thickness of 11 mm after resection is below the 12 mm threshold associated with markedly increased patellar fracture risk. I would not resurface this patella. Instead I would smooth the articular surface, remove osteophytes, and leave the patella unresurfaced, accepting the higher risk of anterior knee pain in exchange for fracture prevention. **Rationale**: Patellar fracture rates rise sharply when residual bone is less than 12 mm. In a 72-year-old low-demand patient the risk of fracture outweighs the benefit of resurfacing. I would document the decision and the measured thicknesses in the operative note. **Alternative options**: Some surgeons would use a thin inset button (6-7 mm) to reduce the amount of bone removed, but this still leaves limited bone stock for future revision if loosening occurs. In my practice I prefer non-resurfacing when residual thickness would be less than 12 mm. **Post-operative counselling**: The patient should be warned of a 10-15 percent chance of anterior knee pain and the possibility of secondary resurfacing if symptoms are severe. Quadriceps strengthening is emphasised to optimise extensor mechanism function.
Viva scenarioAdvanced
Clinical prompt

You are performing a primary TKA and after cementing the patellar button the no-thumb test shows persistent lateral tilt throughout the flexion arc. The femoral component is in 3 degrees of external rotation relative to the epicondylar axis and the tibial component is neutral. What is your next step?

Practical approach
With correct femoral and tibial rotation confirmed, persistent lateral tilt indicates that a lateral retinacular release is required. The release should be performed from inside-out, preserving the lateral superior geniculate artery if possible, and extending distally only as far as needed to allow the patella to track centrally without tilt. **Technique**: With the knee in 90 degrees of flexion, place a retractor under the lateral retinaculum. Use electrocautery or scissors to divide the retinaculum from the superior pole of the patella distally toward the tibial tubercle, staying 1 cm lateral to the patellar border to avoid the lateral inferior geniculate. Test tracking after each 1 cm increment of release. Stop when the no-thumb test is negative. **Avoid over-release**: Excessive release can produce medial subluxation or disrupt the blood supply. Only release what is necessary to achieve central tracking. **Final verification**: Re-test the no-thumb test through the full arc after release. Confirm composite patellar thickness and smooth excursion before closure.
Exam day cheat sheet
Patellar Resurfacing in Primary TKA — Exam Day Summary

References

Evidence

Patellar resurfacing versus non-resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis

Level I
Pilling R, Moulder E, Allgar V, et al.J Bone Joint Surg Br
Evidence

Patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Level I
Chen K, Li G, Fu D, et al.Knee
Evidence

The effect of patellar resurfacing on anterior knee pain and function after total knee arthroplasty

Level II
Barrack RL, Bertot AJ, Wolfe MW, et al.J Bone Joint Surg Am
Evidence

Patellar resurfacing in inflammatory arthritis: long-term results

Level III
Stern SH, Insall JNClin Orthop Relat Res
Evidence

Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry — Annual Report

Level IV
AOANJRRAOANJRR Annual Report
Editorially reviewed — transparent references and correction processPublished by OrthoVellum Medical Education TeamEditorial boardMethodologyReview policy
Educational disclosure

Educational content is reviewed for source visibility, editorial coherence, and correction readiness.

No individual clinician credential is claimed unless a named person is shown.

Verify before clinical use; this is not medical advice or a substitute for local guidance.