Skip to main content
OrthoVellumOrthopaedic Exam Prep
Pricing
About OrthoVellum
OrthoVellum
A living orthopaedic atlas

Exam-focused orthopaedic references, a question bank, viva practice, and spaced-repetition revision β€” with every clinical claim traceable to its source. Content is educational only and is not a substitute for local supervision, clinical judgement, or institutional policy.


Library

  • Clinical Topics
  • Blog
  • Site Updates
  • Content Methodology

Company

  • About Us
  • Authors & Disclosure
  • Editorial Team
  • Editorial Policy
  • Advertising Policy

Legal

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Medical Disclaimer
  • Copyright & DMCA

Support

  • Support OrthoVellum
  • Help Center
  • Contact
  • Accessibility
Evidence. Clarity. Practice.

Β© 2026 OrthoVellum. For educational purposes only.

Not medical advice. Verify clinically important information against current local guidance.

Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty - Standard Measured Resection Technique

Operative SurgeryArthroplasty
ArthroplastyAdvancedCore Procedure

Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty - Standard Measured Resection Technique

Surgical technique guide for Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty - Standard Measured Resection Technique

Procedure console
45
Read
0
Sections
advanced
Level
Peer-reviewed Β· 2026-06-20
High-yield overview

End-stage tricompartmental knee osteoarthritis Β· medial parapatellar approach Β· measured resection Β· advanced

arthroplastySubspecialty
12Operative steps
5Danger structures
90 minTypical duration
Critical Must-Knows
  • Tricompartmental osteoarthritis with failed 3-6 months conservative treatment (NSAIDs, physiotherapy, intra-articular injections, bracing)
  • Proximal tibial cut is MOST CRITICAL for alignment - perpendicular to mechanical axis (0Β° varus/valgus), 3-7Β° posterior slope, resect 8-10mm from least worn plateau
  • Femoral rotation: THREE references must align - transepicondylar axis (GOLD STANDARD), Whiteside's line, posterior condylar axis plus 3Β° external rotation
  • Gap balancing creates equal rectangular extension and flexion gaps throughout ROM - ensures stability, proper kinematics, optimal polyethylene loading
Clinical Pearls
  • β€œ
    TIBIAL CUT determines overall limb alignment - use extramedullary guide aligned to 2nd ray at ankle and tibial tubercle anteriorly, perpendicular in coronal plane, 5-7Β° posterior slope for CR (3-5Β° for PS)
  • β€œ
    FEMORAL ROTATION priority: Transepicondylar axis (TEA) is gold standard. If discrepant with Whiteside's line or posterior condylar axis plus 3Β°, PRIORITIZE TEA to avoid patellar maltracking
  • β€œ
    VALGUS CUT ANGLE 5-7Β° on distal femur compensates for anatomic valgus, creating cut perpendicular to femoral mechanical axis. With perpendicular tibial cut, creates neutral HKA 180Β° plus or minus 3Β°
  • β€œ
    VARUS KNEE balancing: Sequential medial release - deep MCL, superficial MCL pie-crusting, pes anserinus, semimembranosus, posteromedial capsule. NEVER completely release MCL or LCL

When & Why


Indication. Symptomatic end-stage knee osteoarthritis β€” most often tricompartmental, Kellgren-Lawrence grade 3-4 β€” that has failed 3-6 months of conservative care (NSAIDs, physiotherapy, intra-articular injections, bracing), with pain, stiffness and functional limitation. Other accepted indications are: - Rheumatoid arthritis / inflammatory arthropathy with advanced joint destruction despite optimal medical management.

  • Post-traumatic arthritis with tricompartmental involvement and mechanical symptoms.
  • Osteonecrosis (AVN) of the distal femur or proximal tibia with secondary arthritis and collapse. Assess the whole limb, not just the joint. Before committing, plan for the deformity (varus in roughly 80 percent of primary TKAs, valgus in about 20 percent), any fixed flexion contracture, patellar maltracking, and the state of the contralateral hip and ankle β€” all of which influence exposure, balancing and the eventual mechanical axis. The one technique decision. The page covers the standard measured resection technique, in which cuts are made from fixed bony landmarks and set resection depths. It is the alternative to gap balancing, where cuts are adjusted to create equal tensioned gaps. The two are clinically equivalent (see Background and Evidence), so the choice is driven by surgeon familiarity and reproducibility rather than superiority.
Measured resection

Cuts from fixed landmarks and set depths (9-10mm distal femur, 8-10mm from the least-worn tibial plateau) with rotation referenced off the transepicondylar axis. Familiar, reproducible, independent of soft-tissue tension.

Gap balancing

Distal femoral resection and rotation adjusted so the flexion and extension gaps are equal and rectangular under tension. Equivalent outcomes to measured resection at two years (Singh RCT).

Consent specifically for infection (1-2 percent), venous thromboembolism (DVT 2-4 percent, PE 0.5-1 percent), stiffness and the possible need for manipulation, periprosthetic fracture, instability, common peroneal nerve palsy (especially in severe valgus), and the long-term possibility of aseptic loosening and revision surgery. Setup. Supine with the operative leg free to flex 120Β° and extend fully; upper-thigh tourniquet inflated to 300mmHg or limb-occlusion-pressure plus 100mmHg (typically 350-400mmHg). A lateral thigh post at hip level and a hip bump give 15-20Β° of external rotation to ease patellar eversion.

The Operation


The goal: restore a neutral mechanical axis (HKA 180Β° plus or minus 3Β°) with a stable, well-balanced, mobile knee. The exposure is the medial parapatellar approach (the gold standard, used in about 90 percent of primary TKAs), laid out in full as the first steps below and in depth on the medial parapatellar approach to the knee page.

TKA measured resection
Primary total knee arthroplasty by measured resection: femoral and tibial components in place.Credit: OrthoVellum surgical illustration

Operative sequence

Step 1Position & exposure setup
  • Supine; the operative leg must be free to flex to 120Β° and extend fully for alignment assessment.
  • Drop the foot of the table 90Β° or use a leg positioner; place a lateral thigh post at hip level to prevent adduction and pad it well (common peroneal nerve).
  • Small towel bump under the ipsilateral hip for 15-20Β° external rotation, which facilitates patellar eversion.
  • Tourniquet on the proximal thigh at 300mmHg or LOP plus 100mmHg (typically 350-400mmHg); exsanguinate with Esmarch unless severe peripheral vascular disease (then elevation only).
  • Prepare and drape circumferentially, including the foot, for ROM and alignment checks.
Step 2Medial parapatellar approach (the exposure)
  • Midline longitudinal skin incision 12-15cm, centered over the patella, from 5cm proximal to the superior pole to 2-3cm distal to the tibial tubercle. A midline incision preserves the blood supply to both medial and lateral skin flaps and converts easily if more exposure is needed.
  • Medial parapatellar arthrotomy along the quadriceps tendon and patellar tendon β€” the gold-standard exposure used in about 90 percent of primary TKAs. It gives excellent femoral, tibial and patellar access and preserves the extensor mechanism.
  • Evert the patella and flex the knee to deliver the joint.
  • When extending the arthrotomy past the tibial tubercle, stay DIRECTLY ON BONE and score the periosteum sharply β€” never undermine the patellar tendon insertion (avulsion is catastrophic).
Step 3Systematic osteophyte removal (before any cuts)
  • MANDATORY before bone cuts β€” residual osteophytes cause soft-tissue imbalance and interfere with cutting guides.
  • Femoral osteophytes: anterior trochlea, medial and lateral condyles circumferentially, posterior condyles, intercondylar notch.
  • Tibial osteophytes: peripheral plateaus, tibial spines, posterior tibia.
  • Patellar osteophytes: peripheral rim.
Step 4Proximal tibial cut - the FOUNDATION of alignment
  • MOST CRITICAL cut for overall limb alignment.
  • Extramedullary guide: centre of the ankle (or 2nd metatarsal ray) distally; parallel to the tibial tubercle and anterior tibial crest; perpendicular to the mechanical axis in the coronal plane (verify with an alignment rod from hip centre to ankle centre through the knee centre).
  • Sagittal posterior slope 3-7Β° (CR design 5-7Β° for rollback; PS design 3-5Β°).
  • Resect 8-10mm from the LEAST WORN plateau (usually lateral in varus OA, medial in valgus) to preserve bone stock.
  • Place broad posterior retractors (Hohmann or Bennett) and stay ANTERIOR with the saw β€” the popliteal neurovascular bundle lies 10-15mm posterior.
Step 5Distal femoral cut
  • Intramedullary guide; entry point 1cm anterior to the PCL insertion in the centre of the intercondylar notch, drilled with a 3/8" bit.
  • Valgus angle 5-7Β°, which compensates for the 6Β° anatomic valgus of the distal femur and makes the cut perpendicular to the femoral mechanical axis.
  • Resect 9-10mm from the distal condyle (usually the lateral condyle in a varus knee).
  • Equal resection from both condyles creates the balanced rectangular extension gap.
Step 6Femoral sizing and rotation (CRITICAL)
  • THREE references should align: (1) the TRANSEPICONDYLAR AXIS (TEA) β€” the GOLD STANDARD, from the medial epicondylar sulcus (posterior to the MCL origin) to the lateral epicondylar prominence; (2) WHITESIDE'S LINE β€” the AP axis, from the deepest trochlear groove to the centre of the intercondylar notch; (3) the POSTERIOR CONDYLAR AXIS plus 3Β° external rotation.
  • If the references conflict (dysplastic or asymmetrically worn condyles), PRIORITIZE the TEA.
  • Internal rotation causes patellar maltracking, anterior knee pain and medial flexion-gap tightness; excessive external rotation (more than 5Β°) causes lateral patellar subluxation and lateral flexion-gap tightness.
Step 7Remaining femoral cuts (4-in-1 block)
  • Anterior cut β€” CHECK FOR NOTCHING (keep 3-5mm of bone anterior to the cut).
  • Posterior condyle cuts β€” set the flexion gap.
  • Anterior and posterior chamfers.
  • Anterior femoral notching increases periprosthetic fracture risk 5-10 fold; if notching is present, downsize the femoral component or accept slight undercoverage.
Step 8Gap balancing and soft-tissue release
  • Goal: equal RECTANGULAR extension and flexion gaps (9-10mm height; equal medial-lateral tension).
  • Extension gap from distal femoral plus proximal tibial resection; flexion gap from posterior femoral plus proximal tibial resection.
  • VARUS knee (80 percent of TKAs β€” medial tight, lateral loose): sequential MEDIAL release, reassessing with laminar spreaders after each β€” (1) deep MCL subperiosteal off the tibia; (2) superficial MCL pie-crusting with a 15-blade; (3) pes anserinus; (4) semimembranosus off the posteromedial corner; (5) posteromedial capsule, staying extraperiosteal. NEVER completely transect the MCL.
  • VALGUS knee (20 percent β€” lateral tight, medial loose): sequential LATERAL release β€” lateral capsule and synovium, popliteus at its femoral origin, posterior fibres of the iliotibial band, lateral head of gastrocnemius, and the LCL only as a last resort and never completely.
  • PCL (CR designs): should be SNUG not TIGHT at 90Β°. Too tight β€” release superficial fibres or pie-crust; too loose β€” use a thicker polyethylene or convert to a PS design.
Step 9Trial reduction - systematic checks before cementing
  • ALIGNMENT: alignment rod from femoral head centre to ankle centre passes through the knee centre (HKA 180Β° plus or minus 3Β°).
  • STABILITY: varus/valgus stress opening less than 3mm in extension and less than 5mm at 90Β°.
  • ROM: 0Β° full extension (no flexion contracture) and a minimum of 120Β° flexion.
  • PATELLAR TRACKING: the 'no-thumb test' β€” the patella tracks centrally without manual pressure.
  • JOINT LINE: distance from the inferior patellar pole to the tibial cut about 10mm; restore the anatomic joint line within 8mm.
  • Reconfirm equal rectangular gaps and no posterior impingement in deep flexion.
Step 10Patellar resurfacing
  • ALWAYS resurface if: inflammatory arthritis, significant patellar wear with eburnation, preoperative patellofemoral symptoms, patellar maltracking, or a young active patient.
  • Measure native patellar thickness (normal 24-26mm), then resect to leave a MINIMUM 12-15mm of residual bone.
  • Absolute minimum residual thickness 12mm β€” less than 10mm significantly increases fracture risk. Aim for overall patellofemoral thickness equal to or less than native, with the median ridge aligned to the trochlear groove.
Step 11Cementation and final components
  • Prepare bone: pulsatile lavage with at least 3L saline, dry, pack with hydrogen-peroxide or dilute adrenaline sponges for haemostasis, then dry again thoroughly.
  • Use 3rd-generation antibiotic-loaded bone cement (gentamicin or tobramycin).
  • SEQUENCE β€” TIBIA FIRST (gravity aids cement penetration): pressurise cement into the tibial cut and component undersurface, insert the baseplate in correct rotation and hold. Then FEMUR (verify TEA rotation), then PATELLA, each while the prior cement cures.
  • Remove ALL excess cement before curing, especially POSTERIORLY. Hold components under pressure until fully cured (8-12 minutes).
Step 12Final polyethylene and closure
  • Remove the trial polyethylene; irrigate with 3-6L saline to clear cement debris and bone fragments.
  • Insert the FINAL polyethylene insert (locks with a definitive click).
  • Final checks: ROM 0-120Β° without restriction, stable varus/valgus stress at 0Β° and 90Β°, central patellar tracking through ROM, no posterior impingement, neutral mechanical axis confirmed.
  • Release the tourniquet and achieve meticulous haemostasis with bipolar.
  • Repair the medial parapatellar arthrotomy with interrupted figure-of-8 or simple interrupted #1 Vicryl (watertight β€” critical for the extensor mechanism), close deep fascia with running 2-0 Vicryl, subcuticular skin with running 3-0 Monocryl, then sterile dressing, compression dressing and TED stockings.
Popliteal neurovascular bundle - the critical safety step

During the proximal tibial cut the popliteal artery and vein lie only 10-15mm posterior to the posterior tibial cortex. ALWAYS seat broad posterior retractors (Hohmann or curved Bennett) before the cut, keep the saw ANTERIOR, and never let it breach the posterior cortex. The same bundle is at risk during posteromedial capsular release and aggressive posterior osteophyte removal β€” stay extraperiosteal and controlled. Venous injury is more common than arterial.

Popliteal artery
Location
10-15mm posterior to the posterior tibial cortex at the joint line
At risk during
Proximal tibial cut (posterior saw exit), posteromedial capsular release, posterior osteophyte removal
Protection
Broad posterior retractors during the tibial cut, stay anterior, controlled extraperiosteal releases
Popliteal vein
Location
With the artery in the neurovascular bundle, 10-15mm posterior
At risk during
Same as the artery; venous injury is MORE COMMON than arterial
Protection
Same as the artery β€” posterior retractors mandatory, stay anterior
Common peroneal nerve
Location
Winds around the fibular neck, 2-3cm distal to the fibular head, laterally
At risk during
Lateral post compression, correction of severe valgus (more than 20Β°), lateral collateral releases, tibial tubercle osteotomy
Protection
Adequate lateral post padding, gradual valgus correction, cautious lateral releases, monitor during correction
Tibial nerve
Location
Posterior to the popliteal vessels, deep in the popliteal fossa
At risk during
Well protected unless the saw violates the posterior cortex or deep uncontrolled posterior releases
Protection
Stay anterior during all tibial work, use posterior retractors, controlled extraperiosteal releases
Patellar tendon insertion
Location
Broad attachment on the tibial tubercle
At risk during
Medial arthrotomy extension distal to the tubercle β€” avulsion is CATASTROPHIC
Protection
Stay directly on bone when extending the arthrotomy, score periosteum sharply, never undermine the tendon
Critical structures at risk
StructureLocationAt risk duringProtection
Popliteal artery10-15mm posterior to the posterior tibial cortex at the joint lineProximal tibial cut (posterior saw exit), posteromedial capsular release, posterior osteophyte removalBroad posterior retractors during the tibial cut, stay anterior, controlled extraperiosteal releases
Popliteal veinWith the artery in the neurovascular bundle, 10-15mm posteriorSame as the artery; venous injury is MORE COMMON than arterialSame as the artery β€” posterior retractors mandatory, stay anterior
Common peroneal nerveWinds around the fibular neck, 2-3cm distal to the fibular head, laterallyLateral post compression, correction of severe valgus (more than 20Β°), lateral collateral releases, tibial tubercle osteotomyAdequate lateral post padding, gradual valgus correction, cautious lateral releases, monitor during correction
Tibial nervePosterior to the popliteal vessels, deep in the popliteal fossaWell protected unless the saw violates the posterior cortex or deep uncontrolled posterior releasesStay anterior during all tibial work, use posterior retractors, controlled extraperiosteal releases
Patellar tendon insertionBroad attachment on the tibial tubercleMedial arthrotomy extension distal to the tubercle β€” avulsion is CATASTROPHICStay directly on bone when extending the arthrotomy, score periosteum sharply, never undermine the tendon
The tibial cut is the foundation

This cut determines overall limb alignment and errors here cannot be corrected by the femoral cuts. An extramedullary guide is more accurate than intramedullary in a deformed tibia. Verify coronal alignment with an alignment rod from hip centre to ankle centre through the knee centre, and resect 8-10mm from the least-worn plateau to preserve bone stock and minimise joint-line elevation.

Femoral rotation - when the references conflict

In a knee with dysplastic or asymmetrically worn condyles the three rotational references will not agree. Do not default to the posterior condyles (they are the ones that are worn). PRIORITIZE the transepicondylar axis β€” it is the most reproducible reference for preventing patellar maltracking. Target 3Β° external rotation relative to the posterior condyles, cross-checked against Whiteside's line.

Cementation - tibia first

Cement the tibia first for better penetration with gravity, pressurise the cement into cancellous bone for mechanical interlock, and remove ALL excess cement before curing β€” posterior cement extrusion can compress the popliteal vessels or cause impingement.

Aftercare & Complications


Rehabilitation | Phase | Timing | Immobilisation / loading | Therapy goals | |-------|--------|--------------------------|---------------| | 1 | Day 0-1 | Compression dressing, TEDS; immediate WBAT with cemented TKA and intact extensor mechanism | Ankle pumps, quadriceps sets, straight-leg raises, active ROM; CPM optional | | 2 | Week 1-2 | Walker to cane | 90Β° flexion and 0Β° full extension by 2 weeks; stair climbing with a rail | | 3 | Week 2-6 | Wound check and suture removal at 2 weeks | 120Β° flexion by 6 weeks; maintain 0Β° extension; quadriceps strengthening | | 4 | Month 3-12 | Driving cleared at ~6 weeks (right knee: off narcotics, adequate quadriceps control) | ROM plateaus at about 120Β° flexion; return to low-impact activities; avoid high-impact running and jumping | | 5 | Long-term | Annual review for life | Annual radiographs β€” progressive radiolucent lines more than 2mm are concerning for loosening | Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis (global named-society practice β€” agent choice varies by region and risk): LMWH (e.g. enoxaparin 40mg daily) is first choice in many European and UK protocols; a direct oral factor Xa inhibitor (e.g. rivaroxaban 10mg daily, apixaban 2.5mg twice daily) is a NICE NG89 option; low-dose aspirin (75-100mg daily) is endorsed by AAOS and increasingly by registries for standard-risk patients; plus mechanical prophylaxis (intermittent pneumatic compression, graduated compression stockings) and early mobilisation in all. Duration is typically up to 14 days for low-dose aspirin or standard risk and up to 2-5 weeks for pharmacologic anticoagulation, individualised by bleeding and thrombosis risk. The CRISTAL trial (Sidhu et al, JAMA 2022; PMID 35997730) found enoxaparin reduced symptomatic 90-day VTE versus aspirin after hip or knee arthroplasty (1.82 percent versus 3.45 percent) β€” balance this against bleeding risk. Analgesia is multimodal (acetaminophen, NSAIDs, opioids as needed) with nerve block or periarticular injection, ice and elevation. Complications

Infection (1-2 percent): early (less than 3 months) acute haematogenous or perioperative; late (more than 3 months) indolent biofilm
Recognition
Pain, swelling, fever, wound drainage; raised CRP/ESR; aspiration WBC more than 3000, PMN more than 80 percent, positive culture
Prevention
Chlorhexidine skin prep, IV antibiotics within 60 min of incision, glucose control (less than 200), minimal tourniquet time, meticulous hemostasis, watertight closure
Management
Early: debridement, polyethylene exchange if components well-fixed, 6 weeks IV antibiotics. Late: two-stage revision (explant, spacer, 6 weeks IV antibiotics, re-implant) β€” eradication around 80-95 percent in contemporary series
VTE (DVT 2-4 percent, PE 0.5-1 percent): risk factors β€” age, obesity, immobility, malignancy, thrombophilia
Recognition
DVT: calf swelling/pain, Doppler ultrasound. PE: dyspnoea, chest pain, tachycardia, hypoxia, CT pulmonary angiogram
Prevention
Pharmacologic prophylaxis (LMWH, factor Xa inhibitor, or aspirin per guideline), mechanical prophylaxis, early mobilisation, hydration
Management
Symptomatic DVT: therapeutic anticoagulation for at least 3 months. PE: anticoagulation; IVC filter if recurrent or contraindicated
Stiffness/arthrofibrosis (5-10 percent): ROM less than 90Β° flexion at 3 months; risks β€” pre-op stiffness, poor pain control, inadequate rehab, infection, CRPS, technical error
Recognition
Limited ROM at 6-12 weeks, firm passive endpoint, pain on stretching; radiographs exclude component malposition or overstuffing
Prevention
Good technique (avoid overstuffing, joint-line elevation, malrotation), aggressive pain control, early ROM, patient compliance
Management
Physiotherapy first-line; MUA at 6-12 weeks if less than 90Β° flexion (60-70 percent success); arthroscopic or open arthrolysis if MUA fails
Periprosthetic fracture (0.5-2 percent): supracondylar femur most common, then patella, tibia; risk β€” anterior notching (5-10 fold), osteoporosis, female, RA
Recognition
Acute pain after trauma or manipulation, unable to weight bear; radiographs; assess component stability
Prevention
Avoid anterior femoral notching, gentle technique in osteoporotic bone, optimise bone health (vitamin D, calcium)
Management
Supracondylar: non-op if non-displaced and stable; ORIF with locking plate if displaced and well-fixed; revision with stems if loose. Patella: non-op if extensor intact, ORIF if displaced, patellectomy if comminuted
Instability (1-2 percent): flexion, extension or global; giving way, effusion, pain
Recognition
Knee gives way; laxity on varus/valgus stress with gap opening more than 5mm; radiographs assess component position and sizing
Prevention
Meticulous gap balancing, avoid excessive bone resection, appropriate soft-tissue releases, correct sizing and rotation, trial before cementing
Management
Mild: bracing and quadriceps strengthening; thicker polyethylene if mild and well-fixed; semi-constrained or CCK if moderate-severe; hinged prosthesis if severe collateral incompetence
Common peroneal nerve palsy (0.5-1 percent): foot drop, dorsum-of-foot numbness; risk β€” severe valgus more than 20Β°, flexion contracture more than 30Β°, lateral post pressure
Recognition
Immediate post-op foot drop, dorsum/lateral leg numbness, weak dorsiflexion and eversion; EMG/NCS if unclear
Prevention
Adequate lateral post padding, gradual correction of severe valgus (staged if more than 20Β°), cautious lateral releases, minimal tourniquet time
Management
Observation (most recover over 6-12 months), AFO for foot drop, physiotherapy and nerve stimulation; 70-80 percent recover by 12 months, 20-30 percent permanent
Aseptic loosening (about 5 percent at 10 years, about 10 percent at 20 years): progressive activity-related pain, radiolucent lines more than 2mm at the bone-cement interface; causes β€” infection (rule out), malalignment, wear, instability
Recognition
Progressive pain over months to years, worse with activity; progressive radiolucent lines more than 2mm (Knee Society criteria); bone scan or PET if unclear; aspirate to exclude infection
Prevention
Optimal alignment (HKA 180Β° plus or minus 3Β°), correct component position and rotation, meticulous cement technique, highly cross-linked polyethylene
Management
Revision TKA with bone grafting for defects (structural allograft, metal augments, or cement) and stems; address the cause β€” malalignment, instability, infection
Major complications - recognition, prevention, management
ComplicationRecognitionPreventionManagement
Infection (1-2 percent): early (less than 3 months) acute haematogenous or perioperative; late (more than 3 months) indolent biofilmPain, swelling, fever, wound drainage; raised CRP/ESR; aspiration WBC more than 3000, PMN more than 80 percent, positive cultureChlorhexidine skin prep, IV antibiotics within 60 min of incision, glucose control (less than 200), minimal tourniquet time, meticulous hemostasis, watertight closureEarly: debridement, polyethylene exchange if components well-fixed, 6 weeks IV antibiotics. Late: two-stage revision (explant, spacer, 6 weeks IV antibiotics, re-implant) β€” eradication around 80-95 percent in contemporary series
VTE (DVT 2-4 percent, PE 0.5-1 percent): risk factors β€” age, obesity, immobility, malignancy, thrombophiliaDVT: calf swelling/pain, Doppler ultrasound. PE: dyspnoea, chest pain, tachycardia, hypoxia, CT pulmonary angiogramPharmacologic prophylaxis (LMWH, factor Xa inhibitor, or aspirin per guideline), mechanical prophylaxis, early mobilisation, hydrationSymptomatic DVT: therapeutic anticoagulation for at least 3 months. PE: anticoagulation; IVC filter if recurrent or contraindicated
Stiffness/arthrofibrosis (5-10 percent): ROM less than 90Β° flexion at 3 months; risks β€” pre-op stiffness, poor pain control, inadequate rehab, infection, CRPS, technical errorLimited ROM at 6-12 weeks, firm passive endpoint, pain on stretching; radiographs exclude component malposition or overstuffingGood technique (avoid overstuffing, joint-line elevation, malrotation), aggressive pain control, early ROM, patient compliancePhysiotherapy first-line; MUA at 6-12 weeks if less than 90Β° flexion (60-70 percent success); arthroscopic or open arthrolysis if MUA fails
Periprosthetic fracture (0.5-2 percent): supracondylar femur most common, then patella, tibia; risk β€” anterior notching (5-10 fold), osteoporosis, female, RAAcute pain after trauma or manipulation, unable to weight bear; radiographs; assess component stabilityAvoid anterior femoral notching, gentle technique in osteoporotic bone, optimise bone health (vitamin D, calcium)Supracondylar: non-op if non-displaced and stable; ORIF with locking plate if displaced and well-fixed; revision with stems if loose. Patella: non-op if extensor intact, ORIF if displaced, patellectomy if comminuted
Instability (1-2 percent): flexion, extension or global; giving way, effusion, painKnee gives way; laxity on varus/valgus stress with gap opening more than 5mm; radiographs assess component position and sizingMeticulous gap balancing, avoid excessive bone resection, appropriate soft-tissue releases, correct sizing and rotation, trial before cementingMild: bracing and quadriceps strengthening; thicker polyethylene if mild and well-fixed; semi-constrained or CCK if moderate-severe; hinged prosthesis if severe collateral incompetence
Common peroneal nerve palsy (0.5-1 percent): foot drop, dorsum-of-foot numbness; risk β€” severe valgus more than 20Β°, flexion contracture more than 30Β°, lateral post pressureImmediate post-op foot drop, dorsum/lateral leg numbness, weak dorsiflexion and eversion; EMG/NCS if unclearAdequate lateral post padding, gradual correction of severe valgus (staged if more than 20Β°), cautious lateral releases, minimal tourniquet timeObservation (most recover over 6-12 months), AFO for foot drop, physiotherapy and nerve stimulation; 70-80 percent recover by 12 months, 20-30 percent permanent
Aseptic loosening (about 5 percent at 10 years, about 10 percent at 20 years): progressive activity-related pain, radiolucent lines more than 2mm at the bone-cement interface; causes β€” infection (rule out), malalignment, wear, instabilityProgressive pain over months to years, worse with activity; progressive radiolucent lines more than 2mm (Knee Society criteria); bone scan or PET if unclear; aspirate to exclude infectionOptimal alignment (HKA 180Β° plus or minus 3Β°), correct component position and rotation, meticulous cement technique, highly cross-linked polyethyleneRevision TKA with bone grafting for defects (structural allograft, metal augments, or cement) and stems; address the cause β€” malalignment, instability, infection

Viva & Exam Focus


Mnemonic

CAPPSTIBIAL CUT - critical parameters

C
Coronal alignment
Perpendicular to the mechanical axis (0Β° varus/valgus)
A
Ankle targeting
Extramedullary guide to the 2nd ray / ankle centre
P
Posterior slope
3-7Β° (CR 5-7Β°, PS 3-5Β°)
P
Proximal resection depth
8-10mm from the least worn plateau
S
Stay anterior
Popliteal vessels 10-15mm posterior β€” use retractors
Mnemonic

TEAWPFEMORAL ROTATION - three references

T
TEA (transepicondylar axis)
Gold standard β€” medial sulcus to lateral prominence
E
Exam priority
If references conflict, prioritise TEA to prevent maltracking
A
Accuracy
Most reproducible reference for proper patellar tracking
W
Whiteside's line
AP axis β€” trochlear groove to intercondylar notch
P
Posterior condyles plus 3Β° ER
Should align with TEA and Whiteside's line

Clinical Decision Scenarios

Practise clinical reasoning and management decisions out loud

Viva scenarioStandard
Clinical prompt

β€œA 68-year-old woman with severe varus osteoarthritis undergoes primary TKA. You have performed the tibial and distal femoral cuts. Walk me through your approach to femoral component rotation.”

Viva scenarioStandard
Clinical prompt

β€œDuring trial reduction, you notice the knee has 5mm medial opening with valgus stress in extension but is balanced in flexion. What is your diagnosis and how do you address this?”

Viva scenarioStandard
Clinical prompt

β€œYou are gap-balancing an 80-percent varus knee. Walk me through your sequential medial release technique and how you assess balance.”

Exam day cheat sheet
Primary TKA - measured resection - exam-day essentials

Indications

  • Tricompartmental OA Kellgren-Lawrence 3-4 failing 3-6 months conservative care
  • RA or inflammatory arthropathy with advanced joint destruction despite medical management
  • Post-traumatic arthritis with tricompartmental involvement
  • Osteonecrosis (AVN) of the distal femur or proximal tibia with collapse

Exposure & danger structures

  • Medial parapatellar approach β€” gold standard, about 90 percent of primary TKAs
  • Popliteal vessels 10-15mm posterior to the tibial cortex β€” broad retractors, stay anterior
  • Common peroneal nerve at the fibular neck β€” pad the lateral post, cautious with valgus correction
  • Patellar tendon insertion β€” stay on bone past the tubercle, avulsion is catastrophic

The critical cuts

  • PROXIMAL TIBIAL CUT: extramedullary guide, perpendicular to mechanical axis, 5-7Β° posterior slope for CR (3-5Β° PS), 8-10mm from least worn plateau
  • DISTAL FEMORAL CUT: intramedullary guide, 5-7Β° valgus, 9-10mm resection
  • FEMORAL ROTATION: TEA (gold standard), Whiteside's line, posterior condyles plus 3Β° ER β€” if conflict, prioritise TEA
  • Avoid anterior femoral notching (5-10 fold fracture risk) β€” keep 3-5mm of bone anterior

Gap balancing

  • Equal rectangular extension and flexion gaps throughout ROM
  • Varus (80 percent): sequential medial release β€” deep MCL, superficial MCL pie-crusting, pes anserinus, semimembranosus, posteromedial capsule
  • Valgus (20 percent): cautious lateral release β€” capsule, popliteus, ITB, lateral gastrocnemius, LCL last
  • NEVER completely release the MCL or LCL β€” causes severe instability needing a constrained implant

Trial & cementing

  • Alignment HKA 180Β° plus or minus 3Β°; stability less than 3mm extension and less than 5mm flexion opening
  • ROM 0-120Β°; patellar tracking 'no-thumb test'; joint line within 8mm
  • Patella: leave at least 12mm residual (less than 10mm raises fracture risk)
  • Cement tibia first, pressurise, remove ALL excess cement β€” especially posteriorly β€” before curing

Aftercare & complications

  • VTE prophylaxis: LMWH / factor Xa inhibitor / aspirin plus mechanical, early mobilisation; CRISTAL β€” enoxaparin beats aspirin for VTE (1.82 percent vs 3.45 percent)
  • Immediate WBAT with cemented TKA; 90Β° by 2 weeks, 120Β° by 6 weeks
  • Infection 1-2 percent, stiffness 5-10 percent, periprosthetic fracture 0.5-2 percent, instability and peroneal palsy 0.5-1 percent each
  • Aseptic loosening about 5 percent at 10 years, 10 percent at 20 years

Background & Evidence


Epidemiology and survivorship. Primary TKA is one of the most commonly performed elective orthopaedic procedures worldwide. Osteoarthritis (most often tricompartmental) is the dominant indication; a varus deformity is present in roughly 80 percent of primary TKAs and a valgus deformity in about 20 percent. Counselling draws on widely reported benchmark rates β€” infection 1-2 percent, symptomatic DVT 2-4 percent and PE 0.5-1 percent, stiffness or arthrofibrosis 5-10 percent, periprosthetic fracture 0.5-2 percent, instability 1-2 percent and common peroneal nerve palsy 0.5-1 percent β€” and on aseptic loosening of about 5 percent at 10 years and 10 percent at 20 years. National joint registries (UK NJR, American AJRR, Australian AOANJRR, Swedish, Norwegian and New Zealand) underpin these global survival and revision benchmarks. Measured resection - the principle. In the measured-resection technique the femoral and tibial cuts are made from fixed bony landmarks and set resection depths (about 9-10mm from the distal femur and 8-10mm from the least-worn tibial plateau), with femoral rotation referenced from the transepicondylar axis. It is the alternative to gap-balancing, in which the cuts are adjusted to create equal rectangular tensioned gaps; the two philosophies are clinically equivalent (see below), so the choice is driven by surgeon familiarity and reproducibility. Key evidence. Berger (1993) defined the surgical transepicondylar axis and showed the posterior condylar axis internally rotates a mean 3.5Β° in males and 0.3Β° in females β€” the anatomic basis for adding roughly 3Β° external rotation and for privileging the TEA. Berger (1998) then showed combined internal component rotation correlates directly with the severity of patellofemoral complications. Whiteside and Arima (1995) established the anteroposterior (Whiteside's) axis as a robust independent check, especially in valgus knees with a hypoplastic lateral condyle. Ritter (2011), in 6070 knees, found component-level neutral alignment gave the lowest failure (0.2 percent) and that compensating one malaligned component with another to reach a neutral axis increased failure. Fehring (2001) showed early TKA failure is dominated by infection (38 percent) and instability (27 percent), with cemented aseptic loosening rare (3 percent) β€” so balancing, infection prevention and reliable cemented fixation are the highest-yield intra-operative priorities. For thromboprophylaxis, the CRISTAL trial (Sidhu, 2022) found enoxaparin reduced symptomatic 90-day VTE versus aspirin (1.82 percent versus 3.45 percent) after hip or knee arthroplasty. Named-society guidance β€” AAOS (Surgical Management of Osteoarthritis of the Knee, with appropriate-use and VTE-prophylaxis guidance), NICE NG157 (primary joint replacement) and NG89 (VTE prophylaxis) β€” frames selection and perioperative thromboprophylaxis, with regional detail drawn from the major arthroplasty registries.

References


Evidence

Determining the rotational alignment of the femoral component in total knee arthroplasty using the epicondylar axis

Level III
Berger RA, Rubash HE, Seel MJ, Thompson WH, Crossett LS β€’ Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research (1993)
Key Findings:
  • Anatomic study of 75 femora defining the surgical transepicondylar axis (lateral epicondylar prominence to medial sulcus)
  • Mean posterior condylar angle was 3.5Β° (plus or minus 1.2Β°) internal rotation in males and 0.3Β° (plus or minus 1.2Β°) in females relative to the surgical TEA
  • Provides the anatomic basis for adding roughly 3Β° external rotation to the posterior condylar axis to approximate the TEA
Clinical implication: The posterior condylar axis under-rotates relative to the epicondylar axis (more so in men), justifying TEA as the primary rotational reference and the posterior-condyles-plus-3Β° rule of thumb.
Verify on PubMed (PMID 8425366)
Evidence

Malrotation causing patellofemoral complications after total knee arthroplasty

Level III
Berger RA, Crossett LS, Jacobs JJ, Rubash HE β€’ Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research (1998)
Key Findings:
  • CT comparison of 30 knees with patellofemoral complications versus 20 well-functioning controls
  • Combined (femoral plus tibial) internal component rotation correlated directly with severity of patellofemoral complication
  • Mild internal rotation (1-4Β°) caused tilt and lateral tracking; moderate (3-8Β°) caused subluxation; large (7-17Β°) caused dislocation or component failure; controls were in external rotation
Clinical implication: Internal rotation of the femoral (and tibial) component is the dominant cause of patellofemoral complications - rotation must be set to the TEA, never the worn posterior condyles alone.
Verify on PubMed (PMID 9917679)
Evidence

The anteroposterior axis for femoral rotational alignment in valgus total knee arthroplasty

Level III
Whiteside LA, Arima J β€’ Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research (1995)
Key Findings:
  • Compared posterior-condyle referencing (46 valgus knees) with the AP (Whiteside's) axis (107 valgus knees)
  • Posterior-condyle group required intra-operative tibial tubercle transfer in 8 knees and had 4 recurrent patellar dislocations needing surgery
  • AP-axis group had significantly fewer tracking problems and no patellar instability at 2 years
Clinical implication: In valgus knees with a hypoplastic or worn lateral condyle, the posterior condylar axis is unreliable; Whiteside's AP line is a robust independent rotational check.
Verify on PubMed (PMID 7497664)
Evidence

The effect of alignment and BMI on failure of total knee replacement

Level III
Ritter MA, Davis KE, Meding JB, Pierson JL, Berend ME, Malinzak RA β€’ The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American) (2011)
Key Findings:
  • Retrospective review of 6070 knees with minimum 2-year follow-up using Cox regression for revision (non-infective)
  • Neutral alignment of both tibial and femoral components gave the lowest failure rate (0.2 percent); tibial varus with femoral valgus 8Β° or more gave the highest (8.7 percent)
  • Compensating malalignment of one component with the other to reach a neutral mechanical axis increased failure (notably valgus femoral malalignment, p=0.008)
Clinical implication: Component-level neutrality, not just an overall neutral HKA, drives long-term survival - each cut must be independently accurate rather than balanced against an opposing error.
Verify on PubMed (PMID 21915573)
Evidence

Functional outcome after computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty using measured resection versus gap balancing techniques: a randomised controlled study

Level Ib
Singh VK, Varkey R, Trehan R, Kamat Y, Raghavan R, Adhikari A β€’ Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery (Hong Kong) (2012)
Key Findings:
  • Single-surgeon RCT of 52 navigated primary TKAs randomised to measured resection versus gap balancing
  • Both techniques produced large improvements in Knee Society, functional, and Oxford scores at 2 years
  • No statistically significant difference between techniques (Knee Society p=0.46, function p=0.44, Oxford p=0.12)
Clinical implication: Measured resection and gap balancing give equivalent clinical outcomes - technique choice should be driven by surgeon familiarity and reproducibility rather than presumed superiority.
Verify on PubMed (PMID 23255643)
Evidence

Early failures in total knee arthroplasty

Level IV
Fehring TK, Odum S, Griffin WL, Mason JB, Nadaud M β€’ Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research (2001)
Key Findings:
  • Of 440 revisions, 279 (63 percent) failed within 5 years of the index arthroplasty
  • Leading early-failure mechanisms were infection (38 percent), instability (27 percent), and failure of cementless ingrowth (13 percent); aseptic loosening of cemented implants was rare (3 percent)
  • The authors estimated routine cementing and careful balancing could have prevented roughly 40 percent of these early revisions
Clinical implication: Early TKA failure is dominated by infection and instability, not loosening - meticulous balancing, infection prevention, and reliable (cemented) fixation are the highest-yield intra-operative priorities.
Verify on PubMed (PMID 11716402)
Evidence

Effect of Aspirin vs Enoxaparin on Symptomatic Venous Thromboembolism in Patients Undergoing Hip or Knee Arthroplasty: The CRISTAL Randomized Trial

Level Ib
Sidhu VS, Kelly TL, Pratt N, et al (CRISTAL Study Group) β€’ JAMA (2022)
Key Findings:
  • Cluster-randomised crossover trial of 9711 patients across 31 hospitals; aspirin 100mg/day versus enoxaparin 40mg/day
  • Symptomatic 90-day VTE was 3.45 percent with aspirin versus 1.82 percent with enoxaparin (difference 1.97 percent, 95 percent CI 0.54-3.41 percent)
  • Aspirin failed the prespecified noninferiority margin; major bleeding and death did not differ between groups
Clinical implication: For standard elective TKA, low-molecular-weight heparin is more effective than aspirin monotherapy at preventing symptomatic VTE; agent choice should weigh thrombosis benefit against bleeding and patient-specific risk within local guideline frameworks.
Verify on PubMed (PMID 35997730)
Evidence

Total knee arthroplasty

Insall JN, Binazzi R, Soudry M, Mestriner LA β€’ Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research (1985)
Verify on PubMed (PMID 3967412)

Foundational work on total knee arthroplasty technique β€” deformity correction by soft-tissue release and ligament balancing, with alignment established as critical to long-term survival.

Evidence

Flexion instability after primary posterior cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty

Pagnano MW, Hanssen AD, Lewallen DG, Stuart MJ β€’ Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research (1998)
Verify on PubMed (PMID 9917666)

Defined flexion instability after CR TKA and the role of balancing the flexion and extension spaces to avoid a knee that gives way in mid-flexion despite a stable extension gap.

Editorially reviewed β€” transparent references and correction processPublished by OrthoVellum Medical Education TeamEditorial boardMethodologyReview policy
Educational disclosure

Educational content is reviewed for source visibility, editorial coherence, and correction readiness.

No individual clinician credential is claimed unless a named person is shown.

Verify before clinical use; this is not medical advice or a substitute for local guidance.

Procedure console
45
Read
0
Sections
advanced
Level
Peer-reviewed Β· 2026-06-20
Procedure info
Level
advanced
Read time
45
Updated
2026-06-20
SURGICAL APPROACHES USED
Medial Parapatellar Approach to Knee
Browse all procedures