Adult Reconstruction

Primary Total Knee Replacement - Comprehensive Technique

Comprehensive surgical technique guide for primary total knee replacement using the medial parapatellar approach with gap balancing for FRCS exam preparation

Core Procedure
advanced
By OrthoVellum Medical Education Team

Reviewed by OrthoVellum Editorial Team

Editorial maintenance, source checking, and correction workflow • Published by OrthoVellum Medical Education Team

High Yield Overview

PRIMARY TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT - COMPREHENSIVE TECHNIQUE

Medial parapatellar approach (90% of cases) with gap balancing technique for end-stage knee arthritis | Advanced arthroplasty procedure

Critical Danger Structures

Popliteal Artery

Location: 10-15mm posterior to posterior tibial cortex, descends through popliteal fossa

At Risk: Tibial cut (saw penetration posteriorly), posterior releases, posterior cement extrusion

Protection: Stay anterior with oscillating saw during tibial cut, use retractors for posterior releases, extraperiosteal technique

Popliteal Vein

Location: Accompanies popliteal artery, slightly more superficial and medial

At Risk: Same as artery - tibial cut, posterior releases, cement extrusion

Protection: Same precautions as artery, recognize venous bleeding pattern (darker, continuous flow)

Common Peroneal Nerve

Location: Winds around fibular neck 2-3cm distal to fibular head, most superficial at this point

At Risk: Lateral post pressure, valgus correction stress, lateral releases (especially ITB), positioning injuries

Protection: Pad lateral post carefully, gradual valgus correction (consider staged procedures if >20° deformity), gentle lateral releases staying anterior to fibular head

Tibial Nerve

Location: Posterior to popliteal vessels in neurovascular bundle, deep in popliteal fossa

At Risk: Deep posterior releases, tourniquet compression, posterior cement extrusion

Protection: Stay anterior during tibial cut, extraperiosteal posterior releases, limit tourniquet time <2 hours

Patellar Tendon Insertion

Location: Tibial tubercle insertion, 2-3cm distal to joint line

At Risk: Arthrotomy extension over tibial tubercle, forceful patellar eversion, tibial preparation

Protection: Stay ON BONE during arthrotomy at tubercle level, gentle patellar eversion (consider tibial tubercle osteotomy if severe stiffness), protect tubercle during tibial preparation

Mnemonic

CATSTIBIAL Cut Alignment - 'CATS' Mnemonic

Mnemonic

TEWFemoral Rotation References - 'TEW' Mnemonic

Indications

Absolute Indications

  • End-stage knee arthritis with bone-on-bone radiographic changes
  • Failed conservative management (6 months minimum: physio, weight loss, NSAIDs, injections)
  • Pain limiting activities of daily living (ADLs)
  • Patient understanding of procedure, realistic expectations, willing to comply with rehab

Relative Indications

  • Inflammatory arthritis (RA, psoriatic arthritis) with joint destruction
  • Post-traumatic arthritis with malunion/nonunion
  • Osteonecrosis with collapse and secondary arthritis
  • Neuropathic arthropathy (Charcot knee) - consider higher constraint

Contraindications

Absolute:

  • Active infection (knee, systemic bacteremia)
  • Insufficient bone stock for fixation (consider stemmed components, bone grafting)
  • Absent extensor mechanism (consider arthrodesis or megaprosthesis)
  • Severe peripheral vascular disease (risk limb loss)

Relative:

  • Poor skin condition (scarring, ulceration, stasis dermatitis)
  • Neuropathic joint requiring higher constraint
  • Morbid obesity (BMI >40) - higher complication rates
  • Young age (<55 years) - higher revision rates
  • Active smoking - wound complications 3x higher
  • Poorly controlled diabetes (HbA1c >8%) - infection risk

Preoperative Planning

Clinical Assessment

  • History: Pain pattern, functional limitation, previous treatments, injections
  • Examination: Deformity (varus/valgus), fixed flexion contracture, ROM, ligament stability, extensor mechanism integrity, skin condition, vascular status (pulses), neurological status
  • Templating: Determine component sizes, assess bone quality, plan for defects
  • Medical optimization: Cardiology clearance if indicated, optimize diabetes (HbA1c <8%), smoking cessation, dental clearance, nutritional status (albumin, pre-albumin)

Radiographic Assessment

  • Weight-bearing AP and lateral knee: Joint space narrowing, osteophytes, subchondral sclerosis/cysts, bone defects
  • Long leg alignment (hip-knee-ankle): Mechanical axis deviation, constitutional varus/valgus
  • Skyline patella: Patellofemoral arthritis, dysplasia, tilt/subluxation
  • Assess: Deformity magnitude, bone defects requiring grafting, extra-articular deformity, ligament competency

Implant Selection

  • Cruciate retention: CR (cruciate-retaining) if intact PCL, PS (posterior-stabilized) if deficient PCL or >15° fixed flexion contracture
  • Constraint level: Standard for most primary TKR, semi-constrained if ligament incompetence, hinged for severe instability
  • Fixation: Cemented for most primary TKR (Gold standard), cementless in young active patients (controversial), hybrid (cementless femur, cemented tibia) rarely used
  • Patellar resurfacing: ALWAYS in inflammatory arthritis, significant wear, patellofemoral symptoms; SELECTIVE in others (surgeon preference varies)

Patient Counseling

  • Realistic expectations: Pain relief 90-95%, improved function but NOT normal knee
  • ROM expectations: Target 0-120°, may not achieve full flexion
  • Activity modification: Avoid high-impact activities (running, jumping sports)
  • Longevity: 90% survival at 15-20 years, may require revision in lifetime
  • Complications: Infection 1-2%, VTE 2-4%, stiffness 5-10%, revision risk 5-10% at 10 years

Major Complications - Recognition, Prevention, Management

Post-operative Protocol

Immediate Post-operative (0-2 weeks)

Day 0 (Day of Surgery)

  • Analgesia: Multimodal (epidural or adductor canal block, IV/PO opioids, acetaminophen, NSAIDs)
  • DVT prophylaxis: Chemical (aspirin 325mg BID, LMWH, or factor Xa inhibitor per protocol) + mechanical (TED stockings, SCDs)
  • Physio: Ankle pumps, quadriceps sets, straight leg raises (if able)
  • Ice/elevation: Cryotherapy pads, leg elevated
  • Wound: Check dressing, monitor for excessive drainage

Day 1

  • Mobilization: Sit edge of bed, stand with walker
  • Weight bearing: WBAT immediately (cemented TKR allows full weight bearing)
  • ROM exercises: Active-assisted ROM with physio, CPM machine if available (controversial)
  • Target: 60° flexion, 0° extension (or pre-op limitation)

Days 2-7

  • Progressive mobilization: Walk with walker/frame, increase distance daily
  • Stairs: With assistance and handrail
  • ROM: Target 90° flexion by discharge, maintain full extension
  • Discharge criteria: Adequate pain control on oral meds, safe mobilization with aid, ROM 0-90°, wound dry

Week 2

  • Wound check: 10-14 days, remove sutures/staples if used (subcuticular can stay)
  • ROM: Target 90° flexion minimum, working toward 110°
  • Mobilization: Walker or cane, stairs with rail
  • Radiographs: AP, lateral, skyline knee (assess component position, alignment)

Early Recovery (2-6 weeks)

Weeks 2-6

  • Physio: Progressive ROM exercises, strengthening (quad sets, SLR, hip abduction/adduction)
  • ROM targets: 0° extension (mandatory), 110-120° flexion
  • Mobilization: Wean from walker to cane (typically 4-6 weeks)
  • Return to driving: 4-6 weeks RIGHT knee (when off narcotics, adequate quad control for emergency braking), 2-3 weeks LEFT knee

Week 6 Post-op Visit

  • Clinical exam: ROM (expect 0-110° minimum), wound healed, no effusion, stable to stress
  • Radiographs: Weight-bearing AP, lateral, skyline (baseline for future comparison)
  • Activity: Progress to ADLs, light household duties
  • Return to work: Sedentary work 6-8 weeks, light physical work 8-12 weeks

Intermediate Recovery (6-12 weeks)

Weeks 6-12

  • Physio: Continue strengthening, proprioception exercises, balance training
  • ROM target: 0-120° by 12 weeks (final ROM typically achieved by 3-6 months)
  • Activities: Walking unlimited distance, swimming (wound sealed), stationary bike
  • Return to work: Physical work by 12 weeks (if job allows modification)

3 Month Post-op Visit

  • Clinical: ROM should be near maximum (0-120° typical), no pain at rest, minimal pain with activity
  • Radiographs: Not routine unless clinical concern
  • Activity clearance: Low-impact sports (golf, swimming, cycling, doubles tennis), no high-impact

Long-term (>3 months)

6-12 Months

  • Maximal improvement: ROM, strength, function (90% improvement by 6 months, 100% by 12 months)
  • Return to activities: Low-impact unlimited, defer high-impact running/jumping
  • Annual follow-up: Clinical exam, radiographs to screen for loosening

Lifelong Precautions

  • Activity modification: Avoid high-impact sports (running, jumping, contact sports) - increases wear and loosening risk
  • Recommended activities: Walking, swimming, cycling, golf, doubles tennis, dancing
  • Dental prophylaxis: Controversial. AAOS 2015: NOT routinely recommended for dental procedures. Consider in high-risk (immunosuppressed, previous prosthetic joint infection, inflammatory arthritis, malnourished, diabetes, hemophilia)
  • Infection vigilance: Any infection elsewhere in body should be treated aggressively (UTI, pneumonia, cellulitis)
  • Fall prevention: Most common cause of periprosthetic fracture
  • Annual radiographs: Screen for osteolysis and loosening (can be asymptomatic)

Expected Outcomes

  • Pain relief: 90-95% achieve significant pain relief
  • Satisfaction: 80-85% satisfied (lower than THA - importance of realistic expectations)
  • ROM: Average 0-120° (depends on pre-op ROM)
  • Function: Significant improvement in walking, stairs, ADLs
  • Implant survival: 90-95% at 10 years, 80-85% at 20 years

Exam Viva Scenarios

Practice these scenarios to excel in your viva examination

VIVA SCENARIOStandard

EXAMINER

"Walk me through your approach to femoral component rotation. What references do you use and which is most important?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
Femoral component rotation is CRITICAL for patellar tracking and flexion gap balance. I use THREE references and all three should align: (1) TRANSEPICONDYLAR AXIS - this is my GOLD STANDARD reference. It's a line from the medial epicondylar sulcus (the most prominent palpable depression on the medial epicondyle) to the lateral epicondylar prominence. The femoral component should be parallel to this line. This is most accurate because it's not affected by posterior condylar wear. (2) WHITESIDE'S LINE - this is the anteroposterior axis from the deepest point of the trochlear groove proximally to the center of the intercondylar notch distally. The femoral component should be perpendicular to this line. This can be unreliable if there's trochlear dysplasia. (3) POSTERIOR CONDYLAR AXIS + 3° EXTERNAL ROTATION - this is a line connecting the most posterior points of the medial and lateral condyles, then I rotate 3° externally from this. This is least reliable because it can be affected by asymmetric posterior condylar wear, especially in valgus knees or hypoplastic lateral condyle. If these three references are DISCREPANT - which can happen with dysplastic or worn condyles - I PRIORITIZE the transepicondylar axis as it's most accurate and reproducible. INTERNAL rotation is the most common error and causes patellar maltracking with medial patellar tracking, anterior knee pain, and medial-side flexion gap tightness with lateral looseness. Excessive external rotation causes lateral patellar subluxation and reverses the flexion gap imbalance.
VIVA SCENARIOStandard

EXAMINER

"You're balancing a varus knee - walk me through your sequential medial release. When would you stop and what are the danger points?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
Varus knee is the most common deformity - about 80% of primary TKRs. The pathology is medial compartment wear with bone loss, contracted medial structures (MCL, pes tendons, posteromedial capsule), and stretched lateral structures. My SEQUENTIAL MEDIAL RELEASE proceeds from least to most destabilizing: FIRST - DEEP MCL FIBERS from proximal tibia. I release these subperiosteally from the tibial insertion. This is usually most effective release and safest. I reassess gap balance with spacer blocks after this. SECOND - SUPERFICIAL MCL in STAGED fashion. I first release mid-substance fibers, then extend the release proximally and distally as needed. I'm very careful not to completely detach the MCL as this causes severe medial instability. THIRD - PES ANSERINUS TENDONS (sartorius, gracilis, semitendinosus). I release these from tibial insertion posteriorly. FOURTH - SEMIMEMBRANOSUS tendon from posteromedial tibia. FIFTH - POSTEROMEDIAL CAPSULE. This is the most DANGEROUS release because the popliteal vessels are directly posterior, only 10-15mm from posterior tibial cortex. I stay EXTRAPERIOSTEAL and use gentle technique. Between EACH release, I reassess the extension gap with spacer blocks and laminar spreaders. I'm aiming for rectangular gap equal to my planned poly thickness (9-10mm) that opens equally medially and laterally with varus/valgus stress. I STOP when I achieve balanced rectangular extension gap. I avoid complete MCL release at all costs - if I can't balance with these releases, I consider thicker poly or higher constraint implant (semi-constrained). DANGER POINTS: (1) Popliteal vessels during posteromedial capsule release - stay extraperiosteal, (2) Complete MCL release - causes severe instability requiring constrained implant, (3) Overcorrection into valgus - very difficult to manage.
VIVA SCENARIOStandard

EXAMINER

"Explain gap balancing technique. Why is it important and what do you do if your flexion and extension gaps don't match?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
Gap balancing is the technique of creating EQUAL and RECTANGULAR extension and flexion gaps throughout range of motion. This is CRITICAL for achieving a stable, well-aligned knee with good kinematics. The EXTENSION GAP is created by the distal femoral cut and proximal tibial cut. It's balanced by soft tissue releases (medial for varus knee, lateral for valgus knee). I assess this with spacer blocks at 0° extension. The FLEXION GAP is created by the posterior femoral cuts (and femoral AP sizing) and the proximal tibial cut. It's balanced by femoral component sizing, rotation, and soft tissue releases. I assess this with spacer blocks at 90° flexion. Both gaps should be EQUAL in height (typically 9-10mm matching poly thickness) and RECTANGULAR (equal medial and lateral opening with stress testing). WHY IS THIS IMPORTANT? Equal gaps throughout ROM = stable knee without instability or excess constraint. Rectangular gaps = balanced medial-lateral tension preventing varus/valgus tilt and wear. This creates optimal kinematics, reduces wear, improves longevity. If gaps DON'T match, I have several options: FLEXION GAP TIGHT (most common mismatch): - Downsize femoral component (most common solution - reduces posterior femoral prominence) - Resect more posterior femur (but must check for anterior notching first) - Release posterior capsule - Thinner poly (but affects both gaps so must ensure extension gap not too loose) FLEXION GAP LOOSE: - Upsize femoral component (increases posterior prominence) - Thicker poly (affects both gaps - ensure extension gap not too tight) - More constrained implant if can't balance (semi-constrained or PS design) EXTENSION GAP TIGHT: - Resect more distal femur OR more proximal tibia (check joint line restoration) - More aggressive soft tissue releases - Thinner poly EXTENSION GAP LOOSE: - Thicker poly - More constrained implant if severe The key is SYSTEMATIC assessment at trialing and willingness to revise cuts or sizing before final cementation.

Primary Total Knee Replacement - Gold Standard Exam Summary

High-Yield Exam Summary

References

  1. Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry (AOANJRR) Annual Report 2023. Adelaide: AOA; 2023. Comprehensive Australian registry data on TKR outcomes, survival rates, and revision causes. Reports 95.5% survival at 10 years for primary cemented TKR, with aseptic loosening and infection as leading revision causes.

  2. Insall JN, Dorr LD, Scott RD, Scott WN. Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989;(248):13-14. Seminal paper establishing the Knee Society Score (KSS) for objective assessment of TKR outcomes. Separates knee score (pain, stability, ROM) from function score (walking, stairs) to distinguish implant performance from patient factors.

  3. Whiteside LA, Arima J. The anteroposterior axis for femoral rotational alignment in valgus total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1995;(321):168-172. Describes Whiteside's line (anteroposterior axis from trochlear groove to intercondylar notch) as reference for femoral component rotation. Demonstrates perpendicular alignment to this line produces optimal patellar tracking.

  4. Berger RA, Rubash HE, Seel MJ, Thompson WH, Crossett LS. Determining the rotational alignment of the femoral component in total knee arthroplasty using the epicondylar axis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1993;(286):40-47. Landmark study establishing transepicondylar axis as gold standard for femoral rotation. Shows TEA alignment produces optimal patellar tracking and flexion gap balance, more reliable than posterior condylar axis.

  5. Ritter MA, Davis KE, Meding JB, Pierson JL, Berend ME, Malinzak RA. The effect of alignment and BMI on failure of total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011;93(17):1588-1596. Demonstrates mechanical axis alignment within 3° of neutral (HKA 177°±3°) critical for implant longevity. Malalignment >3° varus or valgus significantly increases revision rates and accelerates polyethylene wear.

  6. Hofmann AA, Plaster RL, Murdock LE. Subvastus (Southern) approach for primary total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1991;(269):70-77. Describes subvastus approach elevating vastus medialis off intermuscular septum without incising quadriceps mechanism. Reports faster recovery, better quadriceps function, less anterior knee pain vs medial parapatellar approach, though limited exposure in muscular/obese patients.

  7. Emerson RH Jr, Head WC, Peters PC Jr. Soft-tissue balance and alignment in medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1992;74(6):807-810. Early description of gap balancing technique for soft tissue balancing in knee arthroplasty. Emphasizes equal rectangular extension and flexion gaps as foundation for stable, well-aligned knee.

  8. Lombardi AV Jr, Berend KR, Adams JB. Why knee replacements fail in 2013: patient, surgeon, or implant?. Bone Joint J. 2014;96-B(11 Suppl A):101-104. Contemporary analysis of TKR failure modes. Reports instability (21% of revisions), aseptic loosening (16%), infection (16%), and polyethylene wear (10%) as leading causes, with technical errors (component malposition, malalignment, soft tissue imbalance) contributing to majority.

  9. Australian Orthopaedic Association. Guidelines for VTE Prophylaxis in Total Joint Replacement Surgery (updated 2022). Australasian evidence-based guidelines. Recommend aspirin 300mg daily as acceptable prophylaxis for standard-risk patients, with LMWH or factor Xa inhibitors for higher-risk patients (previous VTE, thrombophilia, malignancy). Emphasize mechanical prophylaxis and early mobilization.

  10. Ranawat CS, White PB, West S, Ranawat AS. Clinical and radiographic outcomes of attune and PFC sigma knee designs at 2-year follow-up: a prospective matched-pair analysis. J Arthroplasty. 2017;32(2):431-436. Modern comparison of contemporary TKR designs showing 95-98% survival at 2 years with excellent functional outcomes (mean KSS knee score >90, function score >80). Highlights importance of surgical technique and gap balancing over implant design for short-term outcomes.