Salter Innominate Osteotomy
Surgical technique guide for the Salter innominate osteotomy - redirectional single pelvic osteotomy for developmental dysplasia of the hip and residual acetabular dysplasia, with operative steps, danger zones and comparison with Pemberton and Dega osteotomies
Reviewed by OrthoVellum Editorial Team
Editorial maintenance, source checking, and correction workflow โข Published by OrthoVellum Medical Education Team
Redirectional single innominate osteotomy hinging on the symphysis pubis for DDH and acetabular dysplasia | advanced
Surgical Imaging



Critical Danger Structures and Exam Traps
Sciatic Nerve at the Sciatic Notch
Location: The posterior limb of the innominate osteotomy exits at the greater sciatic notch, where the Gigli saw (or osteotome) emerges. The sciatic nerve lies immediately posterior to the notch.
Risk: Direct laceration by the saw or osteotome, or traction injury during forward rotation and graft insertion. Protect with a curved retractor (e.g. a malleable or Hohmann) seated in the notch, keep the periosteal sleeve intact, and pass the Gigli saw subperiosteally.
Lateral Femoral Cutaneous Nerve
Location: The LFCN crosses the anterior approach near the anterior superior iliac spine, deep to the inguinal ligament, in the interval used for the bikini / anterior Smith-Petersen exposure.
Risk: Stretch or transection causes meralgia paraesthetica (anterolateral thigh numbness/dysaesthesia). Identify and protect it medially; develop the interval lateral to the nerve and avoid vigorous medial retraction.
Femoral Head Blood Supply (MFCA)
Location: The medial femoral circumflex artery (and its terminal retinacular branches) is the dominant supply to the femoral head; the lateral femoral circumflex contributes anteriorly.
Risk: Avascular necrosis is the most feared complication โ usually from forceful concentric reduction, excessive pressure on a reduced head, or aggressive positioning, NOT from the pelvic cut itself. Avoid forced abduction/internal rotation and confirm a tension-free reduction.
Wrong Hinge โ Salter vs Pemberton
The trap: Stating that the Salter hinges on the triradiate cartilage. It does NOT โ the Salter hinges on the symphysis pubis and redirects the whole acetabulum.
The fix: Salter = complete cut, hinge at symphysis, REDIRECTS coverage, volume unchanged. Pemberton = incomplete cut, hinge at triradiate cartilage, RESHAPES and reduces volume. Confusing these is the classic viva failure.
Non-Concentric / Irreducible Hip
The trap: Performing a redirectional osteotomy on a hip that is not concentrically reduced. The Salter cannot reduce a dislocated hip โ it only reorients an acetabulum over a head that is already congruent and centred.
The fix: Confirm concentric reduction (clinically, on arthrogram or imaging) first. A high or irreducible dislocation requires open reduction, often with femoral shortening, before or at the same time as the pelvic osteotomy.
Over- and Under-correction
Why it matters: A single Salter gives only ~15 degrees of correction. Over-rotation causes posterior/lateral under-coverage or impingement and excessive anterior cover; under-rotation leaves residual dysplasia and a persistently steep acetabular index.
The fix: Judge correction intraoperatively by direct inspection of head cover and on-table imaging; the AIIS of the distal fragment should rotate to overlie or lateral to the femoral head, with the acetabular index falling toward normal.
S.A.L.T.E.RSALTER โ Principles of the Innominate Osteotomy
R.E.D.I.R.E.C.TREDIRECT โ Choosing and Planning the Osteotomy
Surgical Indications
Core Indication
The Salter innominate osteotomy is a single redirectional pelvic osteotomy used to improve femoral head coverage in a concentrically reduced but dysplastic hip. It rotates an intact, adequately shaped acetabulum to improve anterior and lateral cover in DDH and residual acetabular dysplasia.
Specific Indications
- Residual acetabular dysplasia in DDH after closed or open reduction, with a persistently high acetabular index in a child roughly 18 months to 6 years of age
- Primary treatment of DDH in the walking child (commonly combined with open reduction in the older or higher hip)
- Anterolateral acetabular deficiency with a congruent, spherical femoral head and a concentric reduction
- Neuromuscular or syndromic dysplasia in selected cases where the symphysis remains mobile (often combined with femoral surgery)
Prerequisites (must ALL be satisfied)
- Concentric reducibility โ the head must sit congruently in the acetabulum
- Spherical, congruent femoral head โ redirection of an incongruent joint worsens load distribution
- Open triradiate cartilage and mobile symphysis pubis โ the symphysis must rotate as the hinge
- A correctable deficiency within ~15 degrees โ the limit of a single Salter
Contraindications
Absolute:
- Irreducible or non-concentric hip without prior/concurrent open reduction
- Stiff symphysis pubis (typically older child / adolescent) โ single Salter cannot rotate
- Markedly incongruent or aspherical femoral head (consider reshaping or salvage procedure)
Relative:
- Deformity requiring greater than ~15 degrees of correction (combine with femoral osteotomy or choose periacetabular / reshaping procedure)
- Severe fixed adduction contracture (release adductors first)
- Active infection
Evidence and Outcomes
Original Description and Principle
- Salter (1961): Original description of the innominate osteotomy โ a complete cut from the sciatic notch to the AIIS, rotation of the distal fragment about the symphysis pubis, and a bone graft wedge held by two pins. Established the concept of redirecting rather than reshaping the acetabulum (see EvidenceCard below for the verified reprint citation).
- Salter & Dubos (1974): Long-term review confirming superior outcomes when reduction and osteotomy are performed in the younger child and emphasising concentric reduction as the prerequisite.
Reported Outcomes
- Good to excellent results in roughly 75-90% of appropriately selected hips operated before significant secondary changes, with improvement in acetabular index and centre-edge angle
- Outcomes decline with increasing age at surgery and with pre-existing avascular changes or incongruity; series consistently show better results when reduction/osteotomy is achieved before about 4 years of age
- Acetabular index typically improves by roughly 10-15 degrees, reflecting the ~15-degree correction ceiling
- The osteotomy also corrects the direction of the acetabulum (anterolateral) rather than its depth
Verified Evidence
Innominate osteotomy in the treatment of congenital dislocation and subluxation of the hip (original description, reprinted as 'The Classic')
The first fifteen years' personal experience with innominate osteotomy in the treatment of congenital dislocation and subluxation of the hip
The effectiveness of the Salter innominate osteotomy in the treatment of congenital dislocation of the hip
Radiographic outcome following treatment of residual hip dysplasia with Pemberton versus Salter osteotomy: comparison of results in patients followed to skeletal maturity
Pelvic osteotomies for the treatment of hip dysplasia in children and young adults
Salter vs Pemberton vs Dega โ Redirectional vs Reshaping Osteotomies
Clinical Decision Scenarios
Use these scenarios to practise clinical reasoning and management decisions
"A 3-year-old girl has residual acetabular dysplasia following closed reduction of DDH at 14 months. She now walks with a mild limp. Radiographs show a concentrically reduced hip with a persistently high acetabular index and deficient anterolateral coverage. The femoral head is spherical and congruent. What pelvic procedure would you consider and why?"
"An examiner asks you to compare the Salter, Pemberton and Dega osteotomies. What are the key conceptual differences?"
"Two years after a Salter osteotomy combined with open reduction for DDH, a child has hip stiffness and serial radiographs show fragmentation and flattening of the femoral head. What has happened, why, and how could it have been minimised?"
Salter Innominate Osteotomy โ Exam Day Summary
Clinical summary
References
-
Salter RB (1961, reprinted as 'The Classic'). Innominate osteotomy in the treatment of congenital dislocation and subluxation of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br 43-B:518 (reprinted Clin Orthop Relat Res). PMID 369757. โ Original description of the redirectional innominate osteotomy, the symphysis pubis as the hinge, and the bone-graft-and-pin fixation principle.
-
Salter RB (1966). Role of innominate osteotomy in the treatment of congenital dislocation and subluxation of the hip in the older child. J Bone Joint Surg Am 48:1413-39. PMID 5921797. โ Extends the technique to the older child and details combined open reduction.
-
Salter RB, Dubos JP (1974). The first fifteen years' personal experience with innominate osteotomy in the treatment of congenital dislocation and subluxation of the hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res 98:72-103. PMID 4817246. DOI 10.1097/00003086-197401000-00009. โ Long-term series emphasising concentric reduction as a prerequisite and better outcomes in the younger child.
-
Pemberton PA (1965). Pericapsular osteotomy of the ilium for treatment of congenital subluxation and dislocation of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am 47:65-86. PMID 14256975. โ Description of the reshaping pericapsular osteotomy hinging on the triradiate cartilage, the key contrast to the Salter.
-
Barrett WP, Staheli LT, Chew DE (1986). The effectiveness of the Salter innominate osteotomy in the treatment of congenital dislocation of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am 68:79-87. PMID 3941122. โ Outcome series quantifying coverage and results, with a clear benefit of operating before 4 years.
-
Sucato DJ, Brabham CE, De La Rocha A, Podeszwa DA, Karol LA (2024). Radiographic outcome following treatment of residual hip dysplasia with Pemberton versus Salter osteotomy: comparison of results in patients followed to skeletal maturity. J Bone Joint Surg Am 107:46-52. PMID 39509475. DOI 10.2106/JBJS.23.01346. โ Modern comparison to maturity showing a better final acetabular index after Salter.
-
Sutherland DH, Greenfield R (1977). Double innominate osteotomy. J Bone Joint Surg Am 59:1082-91. PMID 591540. โ Adds a pubic osteotomy to increase rotation and coverage in the older child, where a single Salter is insufficient.
-
Gillingham BL, Sanchez AA, Wenger DR (1999). Pelvic osteotomies for the treatment of hip dysplasia in children and young adults. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 7:325-37. PMID 10504359. DOI 10.5435/00124635-199909000-00005. โ Review framework comparing redirectional, reshaping and salvage pelvic osteotomies and their indications.