Skip to main content
OrthoVellumOrthopaedic Exam Prep
Pricing
About OrthoVellum
OrthoVellum
A living orthopaedic atlas

Exam-focused orthopaedic references, a question bank, viva practice, and spaced-repetition revision β€” with every clinical claim traceable to its source. Content is educational only and is not a substitute for local supervision, clinical judgement, or institutional policy.


Library

  • Clinical Topics
  • Blog
  • Site Updates
  • Content Methodology

Company

  • About Us
  • Authors & Disclosure
  • Editorial Team
  • Editorial Policy
  • Advertising Policy

Legal

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Medical Disclaimer
  • Copyright & DMCA

Support

  • Support OrthoVellum
  • Help Center
  • Contact
  • Accessibility
Evidence. Clarity. Practice.

Β© 2026 OrthoVellum. For educational purposes only.

Not medical advice. Verify clinically important information against current local guidance.

Selective Dorsal Rhizotomy (SDR) for Spastic Cerebral Palsy

Operative SurgeryPaediatrics
PaediatricsAdvancedCore Procedure

Selective Dorsal Rhizotomy (SDR) for Spastic Cerebral Palsy

Surgical technique guide for Selective Dorsal Rhizotomy (SDR) for Spastic Cerebral Palsy

Procedure console
25
Read
0
Sections
advanced
Level
Peer-reviewed Β· 2026-06-20
High-yield overview

Posterior midline approach to the lumbosacral thecal sac, single-level L1 laminectomy Β· advanced

3-8 yearsIdeal age window
30-50%Rootlets divided per level
S1 40-60%Most aggressive level
~180 minTypical duration
Critical Must-Knows
  • Indicated for SPASTIC diplegia cerebral palsy (GMFCS II-III), age 3-8 years, where spasticity predominates over weakness. SDR is NOT for dystonia, athetosis or severe weakness.
  • Intraoperative EMG is essential. Abnormal rootlets show sustained, spreading, bilateral responses (Grade 3-4) and are divided; normal rootlets (Grade 0-1) are preserved for sensation.
  • Divide 30-50 percent of dorsal rootlets per level from L2 to S2. S1 is treated most aggressively (40-60 percent) because gastrocnemius spasticity drives equinus; L3 is most conservative (25-40 percent) to avoid quadriceps weakness and crouch.
  • Distinguish dorsal roots (POSTERIOR, thinner, sensory β€” the target) from ventral roots (ANTERIOR, thicker, motor β€” never divide). Ventral root injury causes permanent weakness.
  • A modern single-level L1 laminectomy exposes the entire cauda equina while reducing the kyphosis risk to 10-15 percent versus 20-25 percent with a traditional multi-level laminectomy.

When & Why


Indication. Selective dorsal rhizotomy is indicated for spastic diplegia cerebral palsy (bilateral lower-limb spasticity) in ambulatory children (GMFCS level II-III), typically aged 3-8 years, in whom spasticity predominates over weakness (Modified Ashworth Scale 2 or more) and conservative management has failed. The procedure interrupts the sensory limb of the exaggerated stretch reflex by dividing a proportion of the lumbosacral dorsal rootlets, permanently reducing spasticity while preserving useful motor control and sensation. The right child. Beyond the diagnosis, the candidate must have: - Predominant spasticity over weakness, with good selective motor control and dynamic spasticity that improves with nerve blocks or sleep.

  • Adequate trunk control and upper-limb function, and a motivated child and family able to commit to intensive post-operative rehabilitation.
  • No fixed contractures requiring extensive orthopaedic surgery first (small, flexible contractures may be addressed later). Failed conservative management must be documented β€” intensive physiotherapy (at least 12 months), appropriate orthoses (AFOs or KAFOs), multiple cycles of botulinum toxin, and oral anti-spasmodics (baclofen, diazepam).
Ideal candidate

Spastic diplegia, GMFCS II-III, age 3-8, Ashworth 2 or more, good selective motor control, motivated family, and failed conservative care.

Relative indications

Carefully selected spastic quadriplegia with good upper-limb function; older children (8-12 years) with preserved motor control; combined SDR with orthopaedic procedures for mild contractures.

Not for SDR

Dystonia or athetosis (will not improve and may worsen), severe weakness predominating over spasticity, fixed contractures needing orthopaedic surgery first, poor trunk control (GMFCS IV-V), severe spinal deformity, or cognitive impairment preventing rehabilitation.

Pre-operative assessment. Confirm the movement disorder is spasticity, not dystonia. Document the GMFCS level and selective motor control, grade spasticity (Modified Ashworth) and strength (MRC), and assess range of motion. Perform 3D gait analysis to quantify the spasticity distribution and overactive muscle groups β€” it directly guides the level-by-level intra-operative plan. Image the spine with MRI to exclude a tethered cord, syrinx or Chiari malformation, and obtain hip radiographs to assess the migration percentage. Consent specifically for transient sensory change or dysesthesia (5-10 percent), CSF leak or pseudomeningocele (5-8 percent), post-laminectomy spinal deformity (10-15 percent kyphosis), a small risk of new motor weakness from ventral root injury (less than 2 percent), temporary bladder dysfunction, and the need for prolonged intensive physiotherapy and possible later orthopaedic surgery. Set realistic expectations: SDR reduces spasticity durably but does not cure cerebral palsy, does not prevent fixed contractures, and the added gross-motor benefit over high-quality physiotherapy alone is modest. Setup. Prone on a radiolucent Jackson table with the abdomen hanging free and the hips flexed 30-45 degrees (table break) to open the interspinous spaces and reduce epidural venous engorgement. Comprehensive neuromonitoring β€” SSEPs, MEPs and multi-channel EMG β€” is essential, and baselines are recorded before draping.

The Operation


The goal is to expose the lumbosacral thecal sac through a posterior midline approach, open the dura in strict midline, identify each dorsal root from L2 to S2 and separate it into rootlets, then use intra-operative EMG to select and divide the abnormal (spasticity-generating) rootlets while preserving motor function and sensation. The exposure β€” positioning, incision, muscle elevation, the bone-sparing single-level L1 laminectomy and the dural opening β€” is laid out in full as the first steps below, because safe access to the cauda equina is the foundation of the whole operation.

Selective dorsal rhizotomy
Selective dorsal rhizotomy: the dorsal nerve rootlets of the cauda equina are exposed and selectively divided to reduce spasticity.Credit: OrthoVellum surgical illustration

Operative sequence

Step 1Position & neuromonitoring setup
  • Prone on a radiolucent Jackson table, abdomen hanging free to reduce epidural venous engorgement.
  • Hips flexed 30-45 degrees (table break) to open the interspinous spaces β€” critical for an easier laminectomy.
  • Arms abducted and padded; head neutral on a horseshoe or Mayfield; all pressure points protected.
  • Neuromonitoring: SSEPs (posterior tibial nerve), MEPs (transcranial), and EMG electrodes in hip adductors (L2-3), quadriceps (L3-4), tibialis anterior (L4-5), extensor hallucis longus (L5), gastrocnemius (S1), hamstrings (L5-S1) and anal sphincter (S2-4). Baselines recorded before draping.
Step 2Midline incision & muscle elevation
  • Midline posterior incision from L1 to S1 (12-15 cm), confirmed against the spinous processes and fluoroscopy.
  • Incise the thoracolumbar fascia in the strict midline (avascular) plane and elevate the paraspinal muscles subperiosteally off the spinous processes and laminae, out to the facet joints β€” preserving the joint capsules to protect stability.
  • Meticulous bipolar haemostasis; bone wax on exposed cancellous edges. Strict midline avoids entering the canal prematurely.
Step 3Single-level L1 laminectomy (the exposure)
  • The modern approach removes the L1 lamina and the cranial third of L2, exposing the entire cauda equina in the thecal sac at this single level β€” every lumbosacral root is reachable through one window.
  • This minimises bone removal, lowering the kyphosis risk to 10-15 percent versus 20-25 percent for a traditional multi-level laminectomy.
  • Use a Leksell rongeur or high-speed drill with a footplate. Remove the ligamentum flavum with a Kerrison rongeur from the superior edge downward, taking care not to plunge into the epidural space.
  • Control engorged epidural veins with bipolar cautery and irrigation, and haemostatic agents (Gelfoam, Floseal).
Step 4Midline dural opening
  • Confirm the conus level (intra-operative ultrasound or fluoroscopy) before opening β€” the conus usually ends at L1-L2 but may extend to L3 in young children.
  • Pick up the dura in the strict midline (the avascular raphe), confirm CSF pulsation, and create a 2-3 mm opening with a 15-blade, extending cranially and caudally with microscissors to give an 8-12 cm window (L1 to S1).
  • Place 4-0 or 5-0 silk tacking sutures to the dural edges and secure them to the drapes to hold the sac open. Move to the operating microscope for all intradural work and maintain a CSF pool with warm saline irrigation.
Step 5Identify each root & distinguish dorsal from ventral
  • Identify the conus and filum terminale, then follow each root from conus to exit foramen, counting L2, L3, L4, L5, S1, S2 using anatomical landmarks and fluoroscopy.
  • The critical skill: separate the dorsal root (POSTERIOR in the sac, THINNER, 1-2 mm, sensory) from the ventral root (ANTERIOR, THICKER, 2-3 mm, motor). The two merge 5-15 mm lateral to the midline; the dorsal root ganglion is palpable just proximal to the merger. Never divide a ventral root.
  • Under the microscope, separate each dorsal root into 3-5 individual rootlets using fine forceps and microscissors, placing a coloured background for contrast.
Step 6EMG testing & rootlet selection
  • Place a hook electrode under each individual rootlet and stimulate at 50 Hz (tetanic), starting at 0.5 mA up to a 2 mA maximum.
  • Grade the response 0-4: Grade 0 no response; Grade 1 a brief, localised, fatiguing twitch (normal); Grade 2 a sustained single-muscle contraction (borderline); Grade 3 sustained contraction spreading to multiple muscles (abnormal); Grade 4 sustained bilateral response recruiting distant muscles (most abnormal).
  • Divide the Grade 3-4 rootlets preferentially, targeting 30-50 percent of rootlets per level; preserve enough Grade 0-1 rootlets to retain sensation. (The full grading table and per-level targets are in Background & Evidence.)
Step 7Level-by-level rootlet division (L2 to S2)
  • Work systematically from L2 to S2, dividing 30-50 percent of the abnormal rootlets at each level guided by the pre-operative gait analysis and the EMG.
  • S1 β€” most aggressive (40-60 percent). Gastrocnemius-soleus spasticity is the primary driver of equinus (toe-walking) in diplegic CP; under-treating S1 is the commonest cause of inadequate improvement. Divide 2-3 of the 4-5 rootlets.
  • L3 β€” most conservative (25-40 percent). Over-division weakens the quadriceps and worsens crouch gait β€” the commonest technical error. Divide only 1-2 rootlets.
  • L2 (adductors, scissoring): 30-40 percent. L4 (quadriceps and tibialis anterior): 30-50 percent balanced. L5 (EHL, peroneals, hamstrings): 30-50 percent by gait analysis. S2 (intrinsic foot): 30-40 percent, conservative.
Step 8Haemostasis & watertight dural closure
  • Irrigate the thecal sac thoroughly; gently coagulate any bleeding rootlet stumps on low bipolar power, avoiding intact roots.
  • Remove the tacking sutures and close the dura with a running 4-0 or 5-0 braided non-absorbable suture (Tevdek or Ethibond), small 1-2 mm bites, watertight.
  • Leak test: ask the anaesthetist to perform a Valsalva to 30-40 cm water; reinforce any leak with interrupted sutures and overlay a dural sealant (DuraSeal, Tisseel).
Step 9Wound closure & immediate post-op check
  • Re-approximate the paraspinal muscles and close the thoracolumbar fascia robustly with heavy absorbable suture (0 or 1 PDS or Vicryl) to withstand CSF pressure, then layered closure (2-0 Vicryl to Scarpa layer, 3-0 or 4-0 subcuticular Monocryl, skin adhesive). A drain is generally avoided.
  • Examine the child awake: tone should be dramatically reduced; motor power preserved or better (reduced co-contraction); sensation intact (some dysesthesia acceptable). Any new focal weakness suggests ventral root injury.
The single most dangerous step β€” dorsal versus ventral identification

The whole operation turns on correctly separating the dorsal (sensory) from the ventral (motor) roots. Dorsal roots are POSTERIOR and THINNER; ventral roots are ANTERIOR and THICKER. Use anatomical position, the palpable root morphology and EMG confirmation together before any division. Dividing a ventral root causes permanent weakness in its muscle territory and should occur in fewer than 2 percent of cases.

Why single-level L1, not multi-level

The single-level L1 laminectomy exposes the entire cauda equina in the thecal sac at one window β€” all lumbosacral roots are accessible here β€” while removing far less bone than a classic L1-S1 multi-level laminectomy. That is why the modern technique cuts the kyphosis risk from 20-25 percent down to 10-15 percent.

S1 and L3 β€” the two ends of the scale

S1 is treated most aggressively (40-60 percent division) because gastrocnemius spasticity is the primary driver of equinus β€” under-treatment here is the commonest cause of a poor outcome. L3 is treated most conservatively (25-40 percent) because over-division weakens the quadriceps and worsens crouch β€” the commonest technical error.

Aftercare & Complications


Rehabilitation β€” the operation creates a window of opportunity by removing spasticity; intensive therapy is what converts that into functional gain. | Phase | Timing | Focus | |-------|--------|-------| | 1 | 0-2 days | ICU or HDU, neuro observations every 2 hours, flat bed rest 24-48 hours, Foley catheter, multimodal analgesia | | 2 | Day 2-5 | Sit, stand and begin gentle range of motion; early mobilisation capitalises on the tone reduction; AFO review | | 3 | Week 1 to month 6 | Intensive physiotherapy 3-5 sessions per week: quadriceps and dorsiflexor strengthening, balance and proprioception, gait re-education | | 4 | Month 6 to year 2 | Repeat 3D gait analysis at 3 and 6 months; orthopaedic review for residual fixed contractures; annual spine radiographs | Bladder retention is common and usually temporary; a persistent deficit beyond 48 hours warrants evaluation for a cauda equina problem. Most children return to their pre-operative mobility level within weeks, with durable tone reduction and gradual functional gains over the first 1-3 years. Complications

CSF leak and pseudomeningocele (5-8%)
Recognition
Clear glucose-positive fluid from the wound, fluctuant collection, upright headache
Prevention
Watertight 4-0 continuous dural closure, Valsalva test, sealant, robust fascial closure, flat bed rest 24-48 hours
Management
Conservative first: flat rest, pressure dressing, acetazolamide. Persistent leak over 7 days: surgical re-closure. Asymptomatic pseudomeningocele: observe
Post-laminectomy kyphosis (10-15%)
Recognition
Progressive thoracolumbar roundback and back pain on serial radiographs over 2-5 years
Prevention
Single-level L1 laminectomy, preserve facet joints and paraspinal attachments
Management
Under 40 degrees: observe, core strengthening, brace. Over 40-50 degrees or symptomatic: posterior spinal fusion
Sensory change and dysesthesia (5-10%)
Recognition
Altered lower-limb sensation, burning or tingling, proprioceptive loss with gait instability
Prevention
Limit division to 30-50 percent per level, preserve Grade 0-1 rootlets, avoid over 60 percent
Management
Usually transient, resolves in 4-12 weeks; gabapentin or amitriptyline if severe; balance training and AFO if persistent
Motor weakness from ventral root injury (less than 2%)
Recognition
New weakness in a root distribution (quadriceps, dorsiflexors, plantarflexors), foot drop
Prevention
Meticulous dorsal versus ventral identification, EMG confirmation, microsurgical no-traction technique
Management
Physiotherapy strengthening, AFO for foot drop, tendon transfer if permanent after 12 months
Bladder or bowel dysfunction (temporary 5%, permanent less than 1%)
Recognition
Temporary retention in first 48 hours; ongoing retention or incontinence beyond 1 week if permanent
Prevention
Only divide dorsal roots (sphincter function is ventral and parasympathetic), gentle sacral technique, avoid excess cautery
Management
Temporary: Foley, trial of voiding at 48 hours. Permanent: urology referral, intermittent catheterisation, bowel regimen
Insufficient spasticity reduction (5%)
Recognition
Persistent spasticity, often gastrocnemius if S1 under-treated, Ashworth improvement under 2 points
Prevention
Adequate division per level (30-50 percent, S1 40-60 percent), systematic EMG, divide Grade 3-4
Management
Physiotherapy, optimise orthoses, botulinum toxin; revision SDR (high risk) or intrathecal baclofen if refractory
New deformity: calcaneus or crouch (5%)
Recognition
Calcaneus: excessive dorsiflexion, heel-only weight bearing. Crouch: excessive stance knee flexion
Prevention
Balanced division, conservative L3 (25-40 percent), S1 not over 60 percent, pre-operative gait analysis
Management
Calcaneus: AFO with plantarflexion stop, FDL or FHL transfer. Crouch: quadriceps strengthening, extension osteotomy or patellar tendon advancement
Complications β€” recognition, prevention, management
ComplicationRecognitionPreventionManagement
CSF leak and pseudomeningocele (5-8%)Clear glucose-positive fluid from the wound, fluctuant collection, upright headacheWatertight 4-0 continuous dural closure, Valsalva test, sealant, robust fascial closure, flat bed rest 24-48 hoursConservative first: flat rest, pressure dressing, acetazolamide. Persistent leak over 7 days: surgical re-closure. Asymptomatic pseudomeningocele: observe
Post-laminectomy kyphosis (10-15%)Progressive thoracolumbar roundback and back pain on serial radiographs over 2-5 yearsSingle-level L1 laminectomy, preserve facet joints and paraspinal attachmentsUnder 40 degrees: observe, core strengthening, brace. Over 40-50 degrees or symptomatic: posterior spinal fusion
Sensory change and dysesthesia (5-10%)Altered lower-limb sensation, burning or tingling, proprioceptive loss with gait instabilityLimit division to 30-50 percent per level, preserve Grade 0-1 rootlets, avoid over 60 percentUsually transient, resolves in 4-12 weeks; gabapentin or amitriptyline if severe; balance training and AFO if persistent
Motor weakness from ventral root injury (less than 2%)New weakness in a root distribution (quadriceps, dorsiflexors, plantarflexors), foot dropMeticulous dorsal versus ventral identification, EMG confirmation, microsurgical no-traction techniquePhysiotherapy strengthening, AFO for foot drop, tendon transfer if permanent after 12 months
Bladder or bowel dysfunction (temporary 5%, permanent less than 1%)Temporary retention in first 48 hours; ongoing retention or incontinence beyond 1 week if permanentOnly divide dorsal roots (sphincter function is ventral and parasympathetic), gentle sacral technique, avoid excess cauteryTemporary: Foley, trial of voiding at 48 hours. Permanent: urology referral, intermittent catheterisation, bowel regimen
Insufficient spasticity reduction (5%)Persistent spasticity, often gastrocnemius if S1 under-treated, Ashworth improvement under 2 pointsAdequate division per level (30-50 percent, S1 40-60 percent), systematic EMG, divide Grade 3-4Physiotherapy, optimise orthoses, botulinum toxin; revision SDR (high risk) or intrathecal baclofen if refractory
New deformity: calcaneus or crouch (5%)Calcaneus: excessive dorsiflexion, heel-only weight bearing. Crouch: excessive stance knee flexionBalanced division, conservative L3 (25-40 percent), S1 not over 60 percent, pre-operative gait analysisCalcaneus: AFO with plantarflexion stop, FDL or FHL transfer. Crouch: quadriceps strengthening, extension osteotomy or patellar tendon advancement
Other recognised complications include wound infection (2-3 percent), epidural haematoma (rare but catastrophic β€” emergency MRI and evacuation), painful dysesthesias (2-5 percent), scoliosis progression (5-10 percent) and late tethered cord. Seroma is common and usually settles spontaneously.

Viva & Exam Focus


Mnemonic

SPASTICSPASTIC β€” is this child a candidate?

S
Spastic diplegia
Not dystonia or athetosis β€” SDR only works for spasticity
P
Predominant spasticity
Over weakness β€” Modified Ashworth 2 or more
A
Ambulatory
GMFCS II-III, walks with or without aids
S
School age
3-8 years ideal, flexible 2-10
T
Trunk control
Adequate, with good upper-limb function
I
Intelligent and motivated
Child and family able to commit to intensive rehab
C
Conservative treatment failed
Physio, orthoses and botulinum toxin for over 12 months
Mnemonic

BRIEFBRIEF β€” the EMG response grades

B
Bilateral spread
Grade 4 β€” most abnormal, divide
R
Recruitment of multiple muscles
Grade 3 β€” abnormal, divide
I
Isolated sustained single muscle
Grade 2 β€” borderline
E
Early fatigue, brief twitch
Grade 1 β€” normal, preserve
F
Flat, no response
Grade 0 β€” normal, preserve

Clinical Decision Scenarios

Practise clinical reasoning and management decisions out loud

Viva scenarioStandard
Clinical prompt

β€œA 5-year-old with spastic diplegic cerebral palsy is referred for consideration of SDR. Walk me through your assessment and selection criteria.”

Viva scenarioStandard
Clinical prompt

β€œIntra-operatively you stimulate a rootlet and get a sustained bilateral response in both gastrocnemius muscles lasting 5 seconds. What is your interpretation and management?”

Viva scenarioStandard
Clinical prompt

β€œSix months after SDR in a 6-year-old the tone reduction is excellent, but the parents report progressive roundback deformity and back pain. What is your concern and your management?”

Exam day cheat sheet
SDR for spastic cerebral palsy β€” exam-day essentials

Indication

  • Spastic diplegia CP, GMFCS II-III, age 3-8, spasticity over weakness
  • Failed physio, orthoses and botulinum toxin over 12 months
  • NOT for dystonia, athetosis, severe weakness, fixed contractures or poor trunk control

Anatomy at risk

  • Conus ends L1-L2 (L3 in children) β€” identify before laminectomy
  • Dorsal roots: posterior, thinner, sensory β€” the target
  • Ventral roots: anterior, thicker, motor β€” never divide
  • Artery of Adamkiewicz enters T9-L2, usually left β€” feeds the lumbar cord

Critical steps

  • Prone, hips flexed 30-45 degrees, abdomen free, full neuromonitoring
  • Single-level L1 laminectomy exposes the whole cauda equina (kyphosis 10-15 percent)
  • Midline dural opening, tacking sutures, microscope
  • EMG each rootlet at 50 Hz, grade 0-4, divide Grade 3-4
  • Divide 30-50 percent per level; watertight closure with Valsalva test

Level-specific

  • S1 most aggressive 40-60 percent β€” gastrocnemius drives equinus
  • L3 most conservative 25-40 percent β€” over-division causes crouch
  • L2 30-40 percent, L4 30-50 percent, L5 30-50 percent, S2 30-40 percent

Aftercare

  • Flat bed rest 24-48 hours, early mobilisation day 2-3
  • Intensive physio 3-5 sessions per week for 6-12 months
  • Repeat gait analysis at 3 and 6 months
  • Annual spine radiographs for 5 years; orthopaedic surgery for residual contractures

Complications

  • CSF leak and pseudomeningocele 5-8 percent
  • Post-laminectomy kyphosis 10-15 percent
  • Sensory change and dysesthesia 5-10 percent
  • Ventral root motor injury less than 2 percent
  • Bladder dysfunction temporary 5 percent, permanent less than 1 percent

Background & Evidence


Rationale and history. Spasticity is velocity-dependent increased tone driven by an exaggerated stretch reflex. SDR reduces it by dividing a proportion of the lumbosacral dorsal (sensory) rootlets, interrupting the sensory afferent limb of that reflex at the spinal cord while sparing the motor (ventral) roots. The technique was developed by Fasano and refined by Peacock and Arens (Cape Town, 1982), then evolved into the modern bone-sparing single-level conus laminectomy described by Park and Johnston. The spinal cord and cauda equina. The conus medullaris terminates at L1-L2 in adults but may extend to L3 in young children (and to L3-L4 in neonates) β€” its level must be confirmed before laminectomy so the bone window sits at or below the conus. Below the conus, the L1-S5 nerve roots descend within the thecal sac as the cauda equina, becoming progressively more oblique (the L2 root runs at about 30 degrees, the S1 root at about 60 degrees to the horizontal). Each dorsal root divides into 3-7 rootlets (average 4-5), which are the units tested and divided. Blood supply. A single midline anterior spinal artery supplies the anterior two-thirds of the cord (including the motor tracts) and is fed by 6-10 radicular arteries along its length, including the dominant artery of Adamkiewicz (entering T9-L2, usually on the left) which supplies the lumbar enlargement β€” its injury causes anterior cord syndrome. Paired posterior spinal arteries supply the posterior third. Radicular arteries accompany the roots through the foramina and can bleed during rootlet division, usually controlled with bipolar cautery.

0
Response pattern
No response
Interpretation
Normal
Action
Preserve
1
Response pattern
Brief twitch in the appropriate muscle, unilateral, fatigues rapidly
Interpretation
Normal
Action
Preserve
2
Response pattern
Sustained contraction in a single muscle territory
Interpretation
Borderline
Action
May divide to reach target
3
Response pattern
Sustained contraction spreading to multiple muscles
Interpretation
Abnormal
Action
Divide
4
Response pattern
Sustained bilateral response recruiting distant muscles
Interpretation
Most abnormal
Action
Divide
Intra-operative EMG response grading (the classification that defines the operation)
GradeResponse patternInterpretationAction
0No responseNormalPreserve
1Brief twitch in the appropriate muscle, unilateral, fatigues rapidlyNormalPreserve
2Sustained contraction in a single muscle territoryBorderlineMay divide to reach target
3Sustained contraction spreading to multiple musclesAbnormalDivide
4Sustained bilateral response recruiting distant musclesMost abnormalDivide
L2
Key muscles
Hip flexors, adductors
Clinical driver
Scissoring gait from adductor spasticity
Division target
30-40%
L3
Key muscles
Quadriceps, adductors
Clinical driver
Stiff-knee gait (over-division worsens crouch)
Division target
25-40% (most conservative)
L4
Key muscles
Quadriceps, tibialis anterior
Clinical driver
Knee and ankle spasticity, preserve dorsiflexion
Division target
30-50% (balanced)
L5
Key muscles
EHL, peroneals, gluteus medius, hamstrings
Clinical driver
Hamstring tightness, gait instability
Division target
30-50% (gait-guided)
S1
Key muscles
Gastrocnemius-soleus, hamstrings, gluteus maximus
Clinical driver
Equinus (toe-walking) β€” primary driver in diplegia
Division target
40-60% (most aggressive)
S2
Key muscles
Intrinsic foot, minor hamstring
Clinical driver
Foot posturing
Division target
30-40% (conservative)
Level-by-level rootlet division targets
RootKey musclesClinical driverDivision target
L2Hip flexors, adductorsScissoring gait from adductor spasticity30-40%
L3Quadriceps, adductorsStiff-knee gait (over-division worsens crouch)25-40% (most conservative)
L4Quadriceps, tibialis anteriorKnee and ankle spasticity, preserve dorsiflexion30-50% (balanced)
L5EHL, peroneals, gluteus medius, hamstringsHamstring tightness, gait instability30-50% (gait-guided)
S1Gastrocnemius-soleus, hamstrings, gluteus maximusEquinus (toe-walking) β€” primary driver in diplegia40-60% (most aggressive)
S2Intrinsic foot, minor hamstringFoot posturing30-40% (conservative)

Anatomy at risk

Conus medullaris

Ends at L1-L2 but can extend to L3 in children. Identify with ultrasound or fluoroscopy before laminectomy and keep the bone window at or below the conus. Injury causes bladder, bowel and lower-limb dysfunction.

Dorsal versus ventral roots

Dorsal (sensory) roots are posterior and thinner (1-2 mm) β€” the target. Ventral (motor) roots are anterior and thicker (2-3 mm) β€” never divide. EMG and morphology confirm each root before division.

Anterior spinal artery and Adamkiewicz

The anterior spinal artery lies in the anterior median sulcus supplying the motor tracts; the artery of Adamkiewicz (T9-L2, usually left) is its dominant lumbar feeder. Stay posterior, avoid ventral dissection and excess cautery near radicular vessels.

Key evidence. The highest-level evidence is the individual-patient meta-analysis of the three published RCTs (McLaughlin, 2002, PMID 11811645): SDR plus physiotherapy reduced spasticity significantly more than physiotherapy alone, with a small but real additive gross-motor benefit (about 4 GMFM points) and a dose-response between the percentage of root tissue transected and functional gain. Wright (1998, PMID 9593495) showed that spasticity reduction translates into measurable gait improvement at one year. Selection remains the single most important determinant of outcome and is non-standardised worldwide (Grunt, 2014, PMID 24106928). Long-term, the tone reduction is durable for decades but gross motor function peaks around 3 years then gradually declines, and SDR does not prevent contractures (Tedroff, 2015, PMID 25523506). Spinal deformity after modern single-level SDR is driven mainly by baseline patient factors rather than the laminectomy itself (Ravindra, 2017, PMID 28885083).

References


Evidence

Selective dorsal rhizotomy: meta-analysis of three randomized controlled trials

Level I
McLaughlin J, Bjornson K, Temkin N, Steinbok P, Wright V, Reiner A, et al. β€’ Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology (2002)
Key Findings:
  • Individual-patient meta-analysis pooling the three published RCTs of SDR plus physiotherapy versus physiotherapy alone in spastic diplegia (n=90; 82 children under 8 years, 65 at GMFCS II-III)
  • SDR plus physiotherapy reduced spasticity significantly more than physiotherapy alone (pooled Ashworth mean change difference -1.2, p less than 0.001)
  • Gross motor function (GMFM) improvement was greater with SDR but the effect was small (difference in change score +4.0 points, p=0.008)
  • A direct dose-response relationship was found between the percentage of dorsal root tissue transected and functional improvement
Clinical implication: The highest-level evidence confirms SDR reliably reduces spasticity, with a small additive functional benefit over intensive physiotherapy. The dose-response data justify titrating the proportion of rootlets divided per level, but families must be counselled that the gross-motor gain over good physiotherapy is modest.
Verify on PubMed (PMID 11811645)
Evidence

Evaluation of selective dorsal rhizotomy for the reduction of spasticity in cerebral palsy: a randomized controlled trial

Level II
Wright FV, Sheil EM, Drake JM, Wedge JH, Naumann S β€’ Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology (1998)
Key Findings:
  • Single-centre RCT of 24 children (mean age 58 months) with mild-to-moderate spastic diplegia randomised to SDR plus therapy versus therapy alone
  • GMFM improved 12.1 percentage points in the SDR group versus 4.4 points in controls at 1 year (p less than 0.02)
  • Knee and ankle tone were significantly reduced (p less than 0.005) with increased passive ankle dorsiflexion range (p less than 0.001) and reduced soleus stretch-reflex EMG activity (p less than 0.008)
  • Foot-floor contact pattern during gait improved relative to controls (p less than 0.05)
Clinical implication: Demonstrates that the spasticity reduction translates into measurable gait kinematic improvement (ankle range, foot-floor contact) at one year, supporting SDR in carefully selected ambulatory diplegic children when combined with structured therapy.
Verify on PubMed (PMID 9593495)
Evidence

Selection criteria for selective dorsal rhizotomy in children with spastic cerebral palsy: a systematic review of the literature

Level III
Grunt S, Fieggen AG, Vermeulen RJ, Becher JG, Langerak NG β€’ Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology (2014)
Key Findings:
  • Systematic review of 52 studies mapping reported SDR selection criteria across ICF domains
  • Spasticity was documented in 94% of studies, other movement abnormalities (eg dystonia) in 62% and strength in 54% as selection variables
  • Age (44%), diagnosis (50%) and gross motor function (27%) were inconsistently applied, and most criteria were not based on standardised measurements
  • Authors call for international consensus guidelines because selection criteria vary considerably between centres
Clinical implication: Patient selection remains the single most important determinant of SDR outcome yet is non-standardised worldwide. Confirm spasticity (not dystonia) predominates, document GMFCS level and selective motor control with validated tools, and treat heterogeneous published thresholds (age, GMFCS) as guidance rather than rigid cut-offs.
Verify on PubMed (PMID 24106928)
Evidence

Risk factors for progressive neuromuscular scoliosis requiring posterior spinal fusion after selective dorsal rhizotomy

Level III
Ravindra VM, Christensen MT, Onwuzulike K, Smith JT, Halvorson K, Brockmeyer DL, et al. β€’ Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics (2017)
Key Findings:
  • Retrospective cohort of 134 children undergoing SDR via limited laminectomy (82% single-level), mean 53% of L1-S1 rootlets sectioned, mean follow-up 65 months
  • 15 patients (11.2%) subsequently required posterior spinal fusion for progressive deformity
  • Pre-operative non-ambulatory status (p less than 0.001) and a pre-operative Cobb angle over 30 degrees (p=0.003) were the significant risk factors on univariate analysis
  • These are well-recognised deformity risk factors in spastic CP generally; SDR via limited laminectomy did not appear to significantly accelerate neuromuscular scoliosis
Clinical implication: Spinal deformity after modern single-level SDR is driven mainly by baseline patient factors (non-ambulatory status, pre-existing curve over 30 degrees) rather than the laminectomy itself. Screen the spine pre-operatively, counsel higher-risk children, and maintain lifelong radiographic surveillance.
Verify on PubMed (PMID 28885083)
Evidence

A prospective cohort study investigating gross motor function, pain, and health-related quality of life 17 years after selective dorsal rhizotomy in cerebral palsy

Level III
Tedroff K, Lowing K, Astrom E β€’ Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology (2015)
Key Findings:
  • Prospective cohort of 18 children with bilateral spastic CP followed a median of 17 years (15-20 years) after SDR
  • The reduction in lower-limb muscle tone was sustained at long-term follow-up
  • Peak gross motor function (GMFM) occurred at 3 years, followed by a gradual decline; SDR did not improve long-term function or prevent contractures
  • Half of the cohort reported low-intensity pain; the durable tone reduction may help reduce CP-related pain over the long term
Clinical implication: The spasticity benefit of SDR is durable for decades, but it neither halts the natural decline in gross motor function nor prevents fixed contractures. Families should expect that orthopaedic surgery for contractures and ongoing therapy remain likely, while reduced tone and pain are realistic long-term gains.
Verify on PubMed (PMID 25523506)
Evidence

Surgical techniques of selective dorsal rhizotomy for spastic cerebral palsy (technical note)

Level IV
Park TS, Johnston JM β€’ Neurosurgical Focus (2006)
Key Findings:
  • Describes the single-level laminectomy SDR performed at the level of the conus, exposing all dorsal roots without an L1-S1 multi-level laminectomy
  • Single-level exposure reduces operating time, postoperative pain and the risk of progressive lumbar instability compared with the classic multi-level approach
  • Reports only one CSF leak requiring operative repair in more than 1500 patients treated since 1991
  • Confirms intraoperative electrophysiological rootlet testing as integral to the modern technique
Clinical implication: Establishes the single-level (conus) laminectomy as the contemporary standard, with a very low CSF-leak and instability profile in high-volume hands, and underpins the bone-sparing approach now favoured to minimise spinal deformity.
Verify on PubMed (PMID 16918228)
Evidence

Selective posterior rhizotomy for the relief of spasticity in cerebral palsy

Level IV
Peacock WJ, Arens LJ β€’ South African Medical Journal (1982)
Key Findings:
  • Landmark paper establishing the modern selective posterior rhizotomy technique and the patient selection criteria later adopted worldwide
Clinical implication: Defines the Cape Town operation that became the foundation of contemporary SDR.
Evidence

A prospective gait analysis study in patients with diplegic cerebral palsy 20 years after selective dorsal rhizotomy

Level III
Langerak NG, Lamberts RP, Fieggen AG, et al. β€’ Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics (2008)
Key Findings:
  • 20-year follow-up gait analysis demonstrating maintained improvements in spasticity and function after SDR
Clinical implication: Supports the durability of the functional and gait benefits of SDR over two decades.
Evidence

Long-term outcome after selective dorsal rhizotomy in children with spastic cerebral palsy

Level III
Ailon T, Beauchamp R, Miller S, et al. β€’ Child's Nervous System (2015)
Key Findings:
  • Multi-centre study of long-term outcomes including complications such as kyphosis and sensory changes
Clinical implication: Characterises the long-term complication profile that informs consent and surveillance.
Evidence

Changes in hip spasticity and strength following selective dorsal rhizotomy and physical therapy for spastic cerebral palsy

Level III
Engsberg JR, Ross SA, Wagner JM, Park TS β€’ Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology (2002)
Key Findings:
  • Examines the relationship between spasticity reduction and strength gains after SDR
Clinical implication: Documents the strength changes that accompany tone reduction and guide rehabilitation.
Evidence

Selective dorsal rhizotomies in the treatment of spasticity related to cerebral palsy

Level IV
Farmer JP, Sabbagh AJ β€’ Child's Nervous System (2007)
Key Findings:
  • Comprehensive review of SDR indications, techniques and outcomes with emphasis on neurophysiological monitoring
Clinical implication: A broad reference for the indications, technique and monitoring principles of SDR.
Evidence

Long-term functional benefits of selective dorsal rhizotomy for spastic cerebral palsy

Level III
Dudley RW, Parolin M, Gagnon B, et al. β€’ Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics (2013)
Key Findings:
  • Long-term functional outcome study demonstrating GMFCS improvements and quality-of-life benefits
Clinical implication: Adds long-term functional and quality-of-life data supporting SDR in well-selected children.
Editorially reviewed β€” transparent references and correction processPublished by OrthoVellum Medical Education TeamEditorial boardMethodologyReview policy
Educational disclosure

Educational content is reviewed for source visibility, editorial coherence, and correction readiness.

No individual clinician credential is claimed unless a named person is shown.

Verify before clinical use; this is not medical advice or a substitute for local guidance.

Procedure console
25
Read
0
Sections
advanced
Level
Peer-reviewed Β· 2026-06-20
Procedure info
Level
advanced
Read time
25
Updated
2026-06-20
Browse all procedures