Sprengel Deformity Correction

PaediatricsAdvancedCore Procedure

Sprengel Deformity Correction

Operative technique guide for surgical correction of Sprengel deformity (congenital elevated scapula) - the Woodward and Green procedures, omovertebral bone excision, supraspinous resection, clavicular osteotomy, brachial plexus protection, and paediatric considerations

High-yield overview

Operative relocation of the congenitally elevated, hypoplastic scapula by the Woodward or Green procedure | advanced

Surgical Imaging

Critical Danger Structures and Exam Traps
Brachial Plexus Traction β€” the Feared Injury

The danger: As the scapula is relocated inferiorly the clavicle and shoulder girdle descend with it, stretching the brachial plexus. A traction palsy (upper trunk) is the most feared complication.

The protection: Use intra-operative neuromonitoring (somatosensory or motor evoked potentials), perform a clavicular osteotomy or morcellation to decompress the plexus, and never relocate the scapula more distally than the contralateral side. Avoid surgery or be very cautious in older children.

Omovertebral Bone β€” Excise Completely

The lesion: Around one-third of Sprengel scapulae are tethered to the cervical spine by an omovertebral bone, cartilage, or fibrous bar running from the superomedial scapula to the lower cervical spinous processes, transverse processes or laminae.

The trap: It lies close to the vertebral canal and neurovascular structures. Identify and excise it completely (extraperiosteally) before relocating the scapula, otherwise the deformity recurs and abduction remains restricted.

Spinal Accessory Nerve β€” On the Deep Surface of Trapezius

Location: The spinal accessory nerve runs on the deep (anterior) surface of the trapezius, descending from the posterior triangle to innervate the muscle segmentally.

Risk: When the trapezius is detached from the spinous processes and reflected laterally the nerve is endangered. Identify it and protect it during subperiosteal or extraperiosteal elevation, division denervates the trapezius and causes shoulder droop and a winged scapula.

Timing β€” Operate Between 3 and 8 Years

The principle: Best correction with the lowest risk is achieved between three and eight years of age, when the scapula is still mobile and the brachial plexus tolerates descent.

The trap: In the older child the soft tissues and plexus are less forgiving, so recurrence and traction palsy both rise. Counsel families that late presentation carries a less predictable result and that the procedure may be contraindicated in a stiff adolescent shoulder.

Associated Anomalies β€” Screen the Whole Child

The associations: Klippel-Feil syndrome is the commonest (up to half of cases), with cervical ribs, congenital scoliosis, spina bifida occulta, diastematomyelia or a tethered cord, renal anomalies and cardiac defects.

The work-up: Examine the whole spine and neurological system, image the cervical and thoracic spine, and obtain a renal ultrasound and echocardiogram where indicated. A tethered cord alters anaesthetic technique and may need neurosurgery first.

Woodward vs Green β€” Know the Difference

Woodward: Relocates the scapula by detaching the ORIGINS of the trapezius and rhomboids from the spinous processes and reattaching them more distally. It is the most widely used operation today.

Green: Releases the muscles OFF the scapula extraperiosteally (levator scapulae, rhomboids, omovertebral) and repositions the freed scapula with skeletal traction to the opposite iliac crest or ribs. Both procedures add clavicular osteotomy and supraspinous resection in the older child.

Mnemonic

S.P.R.E.N.G.E.LSPRENGEL β€” Clinical Features and Associations

Mnemonic

W.O.O.D.W.A.R.DWOODWARD β€” Operative Steps

Mnemonic

C.A.V.E.N.D.I.S.HCAVENDISH β€” Severity Grading

Surgical Indications

Absolute Indications

  • Cavendish grade 3 or 4 deformity with a visible, cosmetically unacceptable lump and limited shoulder abduction
  • Symptomatic omovertebral bone restricting abduction or causing pain
  • Significant functional limitation of shoulder abduction that interferes with daily activities

Relative Indications

  • Cavendish grade 2 deformity where the patient and family find the visible neck lump cosmetically unacceptable after counselling about the scar
  • Progressive loss of abduction in a growing child within the ideal age window
  • Restricted abduction with a confirmed bony block (prominent supraspinous fossa or omovertebral bar)

Contraindications

Absolute:

  • A stiff, pain-free shoulder in a near-mature adolescent with a mild (grade 1) deformity, the risks of surgery exceed the benefit
  • An uncorrected tethered cord or other major undiagnosed spinal anomaly until neurosurgical evaluation is complete
  • A medically unfit child in whom the associated cardiac or renal anomaly is unoptimised

Relative:

  • Age greater than about 8 years, the soft tissues and brachial plexus tolerate descent poorly and results are less predictable
  • Severe Klippel-Feil with a very short, stiff neck, the increased anaesthetic and neurological risk must be weighed against the modest expected gain
  • A very mild grade 1 deformity found incidentally, observation is appropriate

Goals of Surgery

Surgery serves two purposes and both must be discussed with the family:

  • Cosmetic: to lower the visible lump in the web of the neck and improve the symmetry of the shoulder girdle
  • Functional: to improve shoulder abduction by removing the bony block (omovertebral bone and prominent supraspinous portion) and by repositioning the scapula so the glenohumeral and scapulothoracic rhythm can work

Cavendish Classification and Indication

I
Severity
Very mild
Description
Deformity invisible, shoulder appears normal
Typical Management
Observation
II
Severity
Mild
Description
Visible as a lump in the web of the neck when dressed
Typical Management
Surgery if cosmetically unacceptable
III
Severity
Moderate
Description
Visible lump, shoulder elevated, obvious in clothing
Typical Management
Surgical correction indicated
IV
Severity
Severe
Description
Shoulder very high, scapula near the occiput
Typical Management
Surgical correction indicated

Timing of Surgery

  • Ideal window: between three and eight years of age
  • Why early: the scapula and surrounding soft tissues are still mobile, allowing a larger and safer descent, and neuromuscular adaptation is better
  • Why not older: beyond about eight years the soft tissues stiffen, the brachial plexus tolerates stretch poorly, and both the neurological risk and the recurrence rate rise
  • Late presentation: counsel the family honestly that correction in the older child is less predictable, and that surgery may be withheld if the shoulder is already stiff and the deformity mild

Evidence for Surgery

The Woodward Procedure

The Woodward procedure, described in 1961, relocates the scapula by detaching the origins of the trapezius and rhomboids from the spinous processes and reattaching the muscle mass more distally. It is the most widely performed operation for Sprengel deformity today. Reported outcomes consistently show gains in shoulder abduction in the order of 30 to 40 degrees and a meaningful cosmetic improvement in the majority of grade 3 and 4 deformities operated within the ideal age window.

The Green Procedure

The Green procedure, described in 1957, releases the periscapular muscles extraperiosteally from the scapula (levator scapulae, rhomboids and the omovertebral connection) and repositions the freed scapula, holding it distally with skeletal traction to the opposite iliac crest or ribs. It is less commonly performed than the Woodward but remains a valid alternative, and the two procedures share the key steps of omovertebral excision and supraspinous resection.

What the Series Show

  • Improvement in active shoulder abduction is the most reproducible functional gain, typically around 30 to 40 degrees
  • Cosmetic correction is generally good for grades 3 and 4 but rarely completely normalises the contour
  • Results are best in younger children with mobile soft tissues
  • The brachial plexus traction injury is the most feared complication and is over-represented in older children and in over-relocation

Woodward vs Green Procedure β€” Comparison


Clinical Decision Scenarios

Practise clinical reasoning and management decisions out loud

Viva scenarioAdvanced
Clinical prompt

β€œA 5-year-old girl is referred with a right Sprengel deformity, Cavendish grade 3, an omovertebral bone on imaging and shoulder abduction limited to 90 degrees. How do you manage her?”

Practical approach
This is a classic indication for surgical correction of Sprengel deformity. She is within the ideal age window, has a moderate-to-severe cosmetic deformity and a clear functional limitation of abduction, so I would plan operative correction after a thorough work-up. **Work-up**: Before surgery I confirm the diagnosis and the omovertebral bone on imaging, and I screen for the associated anomalies that commonly accompany Sprengel deformity. I image the cervical and thoracic spine (Klippel-Feil, cervical ribs, scoliosis), obtain a renal ultrasound, and consider an echocardiogram and an MRI of the spine if there is any neurological sign to exclude diastematomyelia or a tethered cord. I examine the neurological system and document baseline shoulder abduction and contour. **Counselling**: I explain that surgery has two goals, cosmetic (the neck lump) and functional (better abduction). I am honest that the contour improves but rarely normalises, and I discuss the posterior scar. I specifically counsel on the most feared complication, a brachial plexus traction injury, and on the small risks of winging, infection and recurrence. **Operative plan**: I would perform a Woodward procedure under general anaesthesia with intra-operative neuromonitoring of the brachial plexus. With the child prone I use a long posterior midline incision, raise flaps to expose the scapula, and excise the omovertebral bone completely and extraperiosteally. I detach the trapezius and rhomboid origins from the spinous processes as one extraperiosteal sheet, protecting the spinal accessory nerve on the deep surface of the trapezius. I resect the prominent supraspinous portion that blocks abduction. Because she is five I would judge whether a clavicular osteotomy is needed, it is more important in the older child. I bring the scapula down to the level of the contralateral side and no further, reattaching the muscle mass more distally while the neuromonitoring traces stay stable. **Post-operative**: Immobilise in a sling for four to six weeks, then begin progressive abduction and strengthening therapy, with neurological review of the arm at every visit.
Viva scenarioAdvanced
Clinical prompt

β€œA 10-year-old boy presents with a previously untreated Sprengel deformity, Cavendish grade 3. His parents want to know whether anything can still be done. How do you counsel and manage him?”

Practical approach
This is a late-presenting Sprengel deformity and the age changes both the benefit and the risk of surgery, so I would counsel the family carefully and individualise the decision. **Why age matters**: Beyond about eight years the soft tissues and the brachial plexus are less yielding. The scapula does not descend as easily, both the recurrence rate and the risk of a brachial plexus traction injury are higher, and the final result is less predictable than in a younger child. **Assessment**: I assess how stiff the shoulder is, how much abduction he has, and how much the deformity bothers him functionally and cosmetically. I complete the same work-up as in a younger child, spine imaging, renal ultrasound, and an MRI of the spine if there is any neurological sign, because the associated anomalies carry the same implications. **Counselling**: I am honest that the correction is less predictable at this age. If his shoulder is reasonably mobile and the deformity troubles him, surgery can still offer a worthwhile improvement in abduction and contour, but I set lower expectations than for a five-year-old. If the shoulder is already stiff and the deformity mild, observation may be the better choice. **Operative plan if we proceed**: I would perform a Woodward procedure but build in the safeguards that protect the plexus in the older child. I make a clavicular osteotomy or morcellation a routine part of the operation to decompress the thoracic outlet, I use intra-operative neuromonitoring throughout, and I do not over-relocate, a partial improvement is safer than a forced full descent. I excise the omovertebral bone and resect the prominent supraspinous portion as usual. **Post-operative**: A longer period of immobilisation and careful neurological monitoring, with therapy to regain abduction.
Viva scenarioAdvanced
Clinical prompt

β€œDuring a Woodward procedure the intra-operative neuromonitoring traces deteriorate as you bring the scapula distally. What do you do?”

Practical approach
A change in the neuromonitoring traces during scapular descent is a warning of impending brachial plexus traction, and I treat it as a real-time signal to act before the injury becomes permanent. **Immediate action**: I release the traction holding the scapula in its descended position and allow it to return partway toward its original position, while the anaesthetist checks blood pressure, anaesthetic depth and limb temperature to exclude a systemic cause for the trace change. I then watch whether the traces recover as the tension is released. **If the traces recover**: I accept a smaller descent than I had planned. A partial improvement that does not injure the plexus is far better than a full descent that leaves a permanent palsy. I reattach the muscle mass at this safer, less distal position and document the limitation. **If a clavicular osteotomy was not performed**: I would now add one. Morcellating or osteotomising the clavicle shortens the rigid ring of the thoracic outlet and decompresses the plexus, which often allows a greater safe descent. After the clavicular step I re-check the traces and, if stable, reattempt a modest descent. **If the traces do not recover**: I abort further descent, reattach the scapula in its original or only slightly descended position, and arrange an urgent post-operative neurological assessment and nerve conduction studies. Most such injuries are neurapraxia and recover, but I involve the peripheral nerve service early. **Prevention in future**: This scenario is exactly why I monitor the plexus and why I add a clavicular osteotomy in the older child, the combination is what makes the procedure safe.
Exam day cheat sheet
Sprengel Deformity Correction β€” exam Day Summary

References

Evidence

Congenital elevation of the scapula

Jeannopoulos CL (1952)
Source: J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1952 Oct;34-A(4):883-92
Evidence

Congenital elevation of the scapula

Cavendish ME (1972)
Source: J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1972 Aug;54(3):395-408
Evidence

Congenital elevation of the scapula. Surgical correction by the Woodward procedure

Carson WG, Lovell WW, Whitesides TE (1981)
Source: J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1981 Oct;63(8):1199-207
Evidence

Sprengel deformity

Leibovic SJ, Ehrlich MG, Zaleske DJ (1990)
Source: J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1990 Feb;72(2):192-7
Evidence

The congenital undescended scapula. Surgical correction by the Woodward procedure

Grogan DP, Stanley EA, Bobechko WP (1983)
Source: J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1983 Nov;65(5):598-605
Editorially reviewed β€” transparent references and correction processPublished by OrthoVellum Medical Education TeamEditorial boardMethodologyReview policy
Educational disclosure

Educational content is reviewed for source visibility, editorial coherence, and correction readiness.

No individual clinician credential is claimed unless a named person is shown.

Verify before clinical use; this is not medical advice or a substitute for local guidance.