Skip to main content
OrthoVellumOrthopaedic Exam Prep
Pricing
About OrthoVellum
OrthoVellum
A living orthopaedic atlas

Exam-focused orthopaedic references, a question bank, viva practice, and spaced-repetition revision — with every clinical claim traceable to its source. Content is educational only and is not a substitute for local supervision, clinical judgement, or institutional policy.


Library

  • Clinical Topics
  • Blog
  • Exam Frequency Index
  • Site Updates
  • Content Methodology

Company

  • About Us
  • Authors & Disclosure
  • Editorial Team
  • Editorial Policy
  • Advertising Policy

Legal

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Medical Disclaimer
  • Copyright & DMCA

Support

  • Support OrthoVellum
  • Help Center
  • Contact
  • Accessibility
Evidence. Clarity. Practice.

© 2026 OrthoVellum. For educational purposes only.

Not medical advice. Verify clinically important information against current local guidance.

Surgical Approaches to the Forearm, Wrist and Hand

Operative SurgeryApproaches & Principles
Approaches & PrinciplesAdvanced

Surgical Approaches to the Forearm, Wrist and Hand

Advanced orthopaedic guide to surgical approaches in the forearm, wrist and hand, including Henry, Thompson, carpal tunnel, scaphoid, flexor tendon and extensor tendon exposures.

Procedure console
6 min
Read
0
Sections
advanced
Level
Peer-reviewed · 2026-06-02

Surgical Approaches to the Forearm, Wrist and Hand

High-yield overview

Use the interval, protect the nerve, preserve tendon glide

Intervaltrue planes matter
Nervessmall branches count
Glidetendon function depends on handling
Approach Families
Forearm bone access
PatternHenry for volar radius, Thompson for dorsal/proximal radius, subcutaneous border for ulna.
TreatmentChosen by bone, plate position, fracture plane and nerve risk.
Wrist access
PatternVolar wrist, dorsal wrist, radial-sided and ulnar-sided windows.
TreatmentChosen by carpal target, distal radius fragment, DRUJ, scaphoid or ligament pathology.
Hand tendon access
PatternBruner, midlateral, dorsal hand and tendon-zone exposures.
TreatmentChosen to preserve skin, pulleys, tendon glide and neurovascular bundles.
Nerve decompression
PatternCarpal tunnel, cubital tunnel, radial tunnel and Guyon canal exposures.
TreatmentChosen by compressive site and branch anatomy.
Critical Must-Knows
  • In the upper limb, a small cutaneous nerve or tendon pulley can determine the result.
  • The Henry approach is safe only when the radial artery, superficial radial nerve, FCR plane and pronator handling are deliberate.
  • The Thompson approach risks the posterior interosseous nerve; pronation moves the nerve away during proximal radius exposure.
  • Hand incisions should respect creases, skin flaps, neurovascular bundles and tendon glide.
  • Closure and rehabilitation are part of the approach because stiffness, adhesions and scar sensitivity can dominate outcome.
Clinical Pearls
  • “
    For forearm fractures, approach choice follows the bone surface that needs reduction and plate placement.
  • “
    For flexor tendon surgery, exposure must allow repair while preserving pulleys and digital neurovascular bundles.
  • “
    For dorsal wrist work, protect extensor compartments and repair the retinaculum when needed to prevent bowstringing or tendon irritation.
  • “
    A carpal tunnel incision should avoid the palmar cutaneous branch and recurrent motor branch territory.
Small structures, large consequences

Upper-limb approaches fail when the surgeon treats the exposure as a skin incision. Nerve branches, vessels, pulleys, extensor compartments and tendon sheaths must be protected from the start.

Forearm wrist and hand approach selection matrix
Approach selection follows the target and the structure at risk: volar radius, dorsal radius, carpal tunnel, carpus, flexor tendon or extensor tendon.Credit: Original OrthoVellum illustration
Volar radius
Common Exposure
Henry approach
Main Danger
Radial artery, median nerve, superficial radial nerve
Rule
Use FCR interval and protect pronator quadratus.
Dorsal/proximal radius
Common Exposure
Thompson approach
Main Danger
Posterior interosseous nerve
Rule
Pronating the forearm helps move PIN away.
Ulna shaft
Common Exposure
Subcutaneous border
Main Danger
Dorsal sensory ulnar nerve distally
Rule
Stay on safe border and preserve soft tissue.
Carpal tunnel
Common Exposure
Volar palm
Main Danger
Palmar cutaneous branch and recurrent motor branch
Rule
Incision ulnar to thenar crease and controlled release.
Flexor tendon
Common Exposure
Bruner or midlateral
Main Danger
Digital nerves and pulleys
Rule
Expose enough to repair but preserve pulley system.
Extensor tendon
Common Exposure
Dorsal hand/wrist
Main Danger
Sagittal bands and extensor retinaculum
Rule
Repair stabilising structures and preserve tendon glide.
At a Glance: Upper-Limb Approach Choice
TargetCommon ExposureMain DangerRule
Volar radiusHenry approachRadial artery, median nerve, superficial radial nerveUse FCR interval and protect pronator quadratus.
Dorsal/proximal radiusThompson approachPosterior interosseous nervePronating the forearm helps move PIN away.
Ulna shaftSubcutaneous borderDorsal sensory ulnar nerve distallyStay on safe border and preserve soft tissue.
Carpal tunnelVolar palmPalmar cutaneous branch and recurrent motor branchIncision ulnar to thenar crease and controlled release.
Flexor tendonBruner or midlateralDigital nerves and pulleysExpose enough to repair but preserve pulley system.
Extensor tendonDorsal hand/wristSagittal bands and extensor retinaculumRepair stabilising structures and preserve tendon glide.
Mnemonic

MAPUpper-Limb Approach

M
Mark
Landmarks, incision, previous scars and planned extension.
A
Avoid
Named nerves, vessels, skin flaps and tendon pulleys.
P
Plane
True interval, tendon window or subcutaneous border.

Hook:Map the limb before opening it.

Mnemonic

GLIDEHand Exposure

G
Gentle tissue handling
Protect skin and subcutaneous flaps.
L
Locate nerves
Digital, palmar cutaneous, dorsal sensory and superficial radial branches.
I
Incision planning
Use Bruner, midlateral or dorsal lines according to target.
D
Do not sacrifice pulleys
Preserve A2 and A4 when possible.
E
Early rehabilitation plan
Closure must support tendon glide and therapy.

Hook:The hand outcome depends on glide.

Overview and Indications


Forearm, wrist and hand approaches are selected by the target structure and by the functional tissue that must survive the exposure. In the forearm, the question is usually which bone surface needs reduction and fixation. In the wrist, the question is whether the target is volar, dorsal, radial, ulnar, intra-articular or ligamentous. In the hand, the question is how to reach tendon, nerve, bone or joint without creating stiffness, scar sensitivity or tendon adhesion.

Forearm

Prioritise safe intervals, plate position, radial artery and PIN safety. The radius has different safe windows depending on level.

Wrist

Prioritise carpal target, extensor compartments, palmar cutaneous branch, radial artery and DRUJ exposure.

Hand

Prioritise neurovascular bundles, pulleys, tendon glide, skin creases and rehabilitation-friendly closure.

Approach choice follows plate position

For forearm fixation, the approach should match the reduction surface and intended plate position. A technically easy incision that places the plate poorly is the wrong approach.

Relevant Anatomy


Upper-limb approach anatomy is dominated by named nerves, vessels, tendon compartments and gliding surfaces.

Volar forearm
Key Structures
Radial artery, FCR, FPL, median nerve, pronator quadratus
Why It Matters
Henry approach uses the FCR region and pronator quadratus for distal radius protection.
Dorsal proximal radius
Key Structures
PIN, supinator, EDC/ECRB interval
Why It Matters
PIN injury is the feared complication; forearm rotation changes nerve position.
Ulnar border
Key Structures
Subcutaneous ulna, ECU/FCU interval, dorsal sensory ulnar nerve distally
Why It Matters
Ulna is accessible but soft-tissue stripping still compromises healing.
Volar wrist
Key Structures
Median nerve, palmar cutaneous branch, recurrent motor branch, superficial palmar arch
Why It Matters
Carpal tunnel release requires controlled distal and proximal release.
Dorsal wrist
Key Structures
Extensor compartments, EPL, dorsal sensory branches
Why It Matters
Retinacular handling affects tendon irritation and bowstringing.
Digits
Key Structures
Digital nerves and arteries, flexor sheath, A2/A4 pulleys
Why It Matters
Poor exposure can cause neuroma, tendon adhesion or bowstringing.
Anatomy That Changes the Approach
RegionKey StructuresWhy It Matters
Volar forearmRadial artery, FCR, FPL, median nerve, pronator quadratusHenry approach uses the FCR region and pronator quadratus for distal radius protection.
Dorsal proximal radiusPIN, supinator, EDC/ECRB intervalPIN injury is the feared complication; forearm rotation changes nerve position.
Ulnar borderSubcutaneous ulna, ECU/FCU interval, dorsal sensory ulnar nerve distallyUlna is accessible but soft-tissue stripping still compromises healing.
Volar wristMedian nerve, palmar cutaneous branch, recurrent motor branch, superficial palmar archCarpal tunnel release requires controlled distal and proximal release.
Dorsal wristExtensor compartments, EPL, dorsal sensory branchesRetinacular handling affects tendon irritation and bowstringing.
DigitsDigital nerves and arteries, flexor sheath, A2/A4 pulleysPoor exposure can cause neuroma, tendon adhesion or bowstringing.
Do not use generated anatomy as proof

For this region, exact nerve and vessel anatomy is too important to infer from a decorative diagram. Use verified anatomy sources and identify structures directly in theatre.

Internervous Plane and Intervals


forearm surgical approaches internervous planes (Henry, Thompson)
Internervous planes of the forearm: Henry (anterior) lies between brachioradialis (radial nerve) and pronator teres then FCR (median nerve); Thompson (posterior) between ECRB (radial nerve) and EDC (posterior interosseous nerve).Credit: OrthoVellum illustration
Henry
Interval or Window
Between brachioradialis and FCR region; develop volar radial interval
Target
Volar radius and distal radius
Main Risk
Radial artery, superficial radial nerve, median nerve if too ulnar.
Thompson
Interval or Window
Between EDC and ECRB proximally; dorsal radial exposure
Target
Proximal/middle radius
Main Risk
PIN in supinator.
Subcutaneous ulna
Interval or Window
Between ECU and FCU along ulnar border
Target
Ulna shaft
Main Risk
Dorsal sensory ulnar branch distally, soft-tissue stripping.
Carpal tunnel
Interval or Window
Volar palm incision ulnar to thenar crease
Target
Transverse carpal ligament
Main Risk
Palmar cutaneous branch, recurrent motor branch, superficial arch.
Dorsal wrist
Interval or Window
Between extensor compartments depending target
Target
Carpus, distal radius, DRUJ, scaphoid
Main Risk
EPL, extensor retinaculum, dorsal sensory branches.
Bruner / midlateral
Interval or Window
Zig-zag volar or midlateral finger incision
Target
Flexor tendon, phalanx, digital nerve
Main Risk
Digital neurovascular bundle and pulleys.
Common Intervals
ApproachInterval or WindowTargetMain Risk
HenryBetween brachioradialis and FCR region; develop volar radial intervalVolar radius and distal radiusRadial artery, superficial radial nerve, median nerve if too ulnar.
ThompsonBetween EDC and ECRB proximally; dorsal radial exposureProximal/middle radiusPIN in supinator.
Subcutaneous ulnaBetween ECU and FCU along ulnar borderUlna shaftDorsal sensory ulnar branch distally, soft-tissue stripping.
Carpal tunnelVolar palm incision ulnar to thenar creaseTransverse carpal ligamentPalmar cutaneous branch, recurrent motor branch, superficial arch.
Dorsal wristBetween extensor compartments depending targetCarpus, distal radius, DRUJ, scaphoidEPL, extensor retinaculum, dorsal sensory branches.
Bruner / midlateralZig-zag volar or midlateral finger incisionFlexor tendon, phalanx, digital nerveDigital neurovascular bundle and pulleys.
PIN protection

In dorsal proximal radius exposure, pronating the forearm helps move the posterior interosseous nerve away from the operative field. Still, do not rely on rotation alone if the dissection is unsafe.

The Six Dorsal Wrist Extensor Compartments


"Protect the extensor compartments" only means something if you can name them. The standard dorsal wrist approach develops the interval between the third and fourth compartments: the EPL is released from its compartment around Lister's tubercle and transposed radially, and the fourth compartment is elevated subperiosteally to expose the dorsal carpus and distal radius. The terminal posterior interosseous nerve lies on the floor of the fourth compartment and can be resected here for a partial wrist denervation.

Axial cross-section diagram of the six dorsal wrist extensor compartments with their tendon contents and Lister's tubercle
Axial cross-section of the six dorsal wrist extensor compartments beneath the extensor retinaculum (radial to ulnar): 1 = APL + EPB, 2 = ECRL + ECRB, 3 = EPL, 4 = EDC + EIP, 5 = EDM, 6 = ECU. Lister's tubercle separates compartments 2 and 3 and is the bony pulley around which the EPL (compartment 3) turns; the dorsal wrist approach develops the 3rd–4th compartment interval.Credit: OrthoVellum surgical illustration
1
Contents
Abductor pollicis longus, extensor pollicis brevis
Surgical relevance
De Quervain release; watch for a separate EPB subsheath and the superficial radial nerve.
2
Contents
Extensor carpi radialis longus and brevis
Surgical relevance
Radial wrist; the radial artery lies deep in the anatomical snuffbox just beyond it.
3
Contents
Extensor pollicis longus
Surgical relevance
EPL hooks around Lister's tubercle (its watershed rupture site after distal radius fracture); transposed in the dorsal approach.
4
Contents
Extensor digitorum communis, extensor indicis proprius
Surgical relevance
The dorsal approach window; the terminal PIN sits on its floor for denervation.
5
Contents
Extensor digiti minimi
Surgical relevance
Overlies the distal radioulnar joint - the landmark window to the DRUJ.
6
Contents
Extensor carpi ulnaris
Surgical relevance
ECU subsheath stability matters; at risk in ulnar-sided and DRUJ work.
Dorsal Compartments (radial to ulnar)
CompartmentContentsSurgical relevance
1Abductor pollicis longus, extensor pollicis brevisDe Quervain release; watch for a separate EPB subsheath and the superficial radial nerve.
2Extensor carpi radialis longus and brevisRadial wrist; the radial artery lies deep in the anatomical snuffbox just beyond it.
3Extensor pollicis longusEPL hooks around Lister's tubercle (its watershed rupture site after distal radius fracture); transposed in the dorsal approach.
4Extensor digitorum communis, extensor indicis propriusThe dorsal approach window; the terminal PIN sits on its floor for denervation.
5Extensor digiti minimiOverlies the distal radioulnar joint - the landmark window to the DRUJ.
6Extensor carpi ulnarisECU subsheath stability matters; at risk in ulnar-sided and DRUJ work.

A reliable memory hook is the 2-2-1-1 tendon count of the first four compartments (APL+EPB, ECRL+ECRB, EPL, EDC+EIP).

Patient Positioning


Supine, arm table
Best Use
Most forearm, wrist and hand surgery
Practical Checks
Tourniquet, hand table, image intensifier, shoulder abduction comfortable.
Hand table with traction
Best Use
Wrist arthroscopy, carpal work
Practical Checks
Finger traps, traction tower, portals, nerve protection.
Arm across chest or pronated/supinated
Best Use
Dorsal radius, Thompson, ulna access
Practical Checks
Confirm C-arm views before prepping.
Wide prep to elbow or arm
Best Use
Tendon, nerve, revision, infection or trauma
Practical Checks
Allows proximal/distal extension and graft harvest if needed.
Positioning and Setup
SetupBest UsePractical Checks
Supine, arm tableMost forearm, wrist and hand surgeryTourniquet, hand table, image intensifier, shoulder abduction comfortable.
Hand table with tractionWrist arthroscopy, carpal workFinger traps, traction tower, portals, nerve protection.
Arm across chest or pronated/supinatedDorsal radius, Thompson, ulna accessConfirm C-arm views before prepping.
Wide prep to elbow or armTendon, nerve, revision, infection or traumaAllows proximal/distal extension and graft harvest if needed.

Surgical Technique


Flexor tendon repair suture technique schematic
Hand exposure should support tendon repair and glide. This open-access schematic illustrates why exposure, pulley preservation and repair technique are linked.Credit: Yang W et al., Clinics (Sao Paulo), 2017 via PMC5629735, CC-BY

Use: volar radius, distal radius fixation, radial shaft exposure.

  1. Supine position with arm on hand table.
  2. Mark radial styloid, FCR tendon, radial artery course and planned plate position.
  3. Incise along FCR for distal radius or extend proximally as needed.
  4. Develop the interval carefully; protect radial artery and superficial radial nerve.
  5. Mobilise FPL and expose pronator quadratus distally.
  6. Elevate pronator quadratus in a controlled manner and repair if possible.
  7. Confirm reduction, plate position and screw length.

Pitfalls: radial artery injury, median nerve traction, superficial radial nerve irritation, excessive pronator stripping and flexor tendon irritation from prominent plate.

Use: dorsal/proximal radius, selected radial shaft fractures.

  1. Supine with arm positioned for dorsal access; confirm image access.
  2. Mark lateral epicondyle, radial head and dorsal radial shaft.
  3. Develop interval between ECRB and EDC according to level.
  4. Pronate the forearm to move PIN away during proximal exposure.
  5. Split supinator only as needed and avoid aggressive proximal dissection.
  6. Reduce radius and place plate according to fracture and contour.

Pitfalls: PIN palsy, excessive supinator dissection, poor plate position and failure to restore radial bow.

Use: ulnar shaft fixation and selected forearm reconstruction.

  1. Supine with arm on hand table.
  2. Mark olecranon, ulnar styloid and subcutaneous border.
  3. Incise over the subcutaneous border, respecting distal dorsal sensory ulnar branches.
  4. Develop ECU/FCU interval with limited periosteal stripping.
  5. Restore length, rotation and alignment.
  6. Close fascia and skin without placing implants under threatened skin.

Pitfalls: excessive stripping, prominent plate, distal sensory branch neuroma and missing combined radial injury.

Use: median nerve decompression at wrist.

  1. Supine, hand supinated, tourniquet if used.
  2. Incision in line with ring finger axis or ulnar to thenar crease depending preference.
  3. Avoid crossing wrist flexion crease obliquely unless extension is needed.
  4. Protect palmar cutaneous branch and superficial arch.
  5. Release transverse carpal ligament under direct vision.
  6. Confirm complete distal and proximal release.

Pitfalls: recurrent motor branch injury, incomplete release, pillar pain, scar tenderness and superficial arch injury.

Use: flexor tendon repair, tendon sheath exploration, digital nerve work.

  1. Use Bruner or midlateral incision according to target and skin condition.
  2. Raise full-thickness flaps carefully.
  3. Identify digital neurovascular bundles.
  4. Open sheath only as needed.
  5. Preserve A2 and A4 pulleys whenever possible.
  6. Confirm repair glide and plan protected rehabilitation.

Pitfalls: digital nerve injury, pulley loss, tendon desiccation, bulky repair, adhesions and poor therapy coordination.

Scaphoid Approaches: Volar (Russe) vs Dorsal


The scaphoid is within this region's scope but needs its own approach logic, driven by the fracture pole and by the bone's retrograde blood supply - the dorsal ridge vessels (from the radial artery) enter distally, so the proximal pole is a watershed zone prone to non-union and avascular necrosis:

Volar (modified Russe) approach

Best for waist and distal-pole fractures. A curved incision over the FCR / scaphoid tubercle, developing the plane between the FCR and the radial artery (the radial artery is the key structure to protect). It allows correction of the humpback (flexion) deformity and volar wedge bone grafting, and it avoids the dorsal blood supply. The cost is release of the volar radioscaphocapitate / radiocarpal ligaments, which must be repaired.

Dorsal approach

Best for proximal-pole fractures and percutaneous or retrograde screw placement down the central scaphoid axis. It gives the ideal screw trajectory for the proximal pole, but it risks the dorsal ridge vessels that are the scaphoid's dominant blood supply, plus the superficial radial nerve and extensor tendons - so dissection is kept minimal (often percutaneous).

The principle: match the approach to the fracture pole - volar for the waist/distal pole and deformity correction, dorsal for the proximal pole - while respecting the scaphoid's dorsally-entering, retrograde, watershed blood supply.

Structures at Risk and Complications


PIN palsy
Where
Thompson/proximal radius
Prevention
Pronate forearm, respect supinator, avoid blind proximal dissection.
Radial artery injury
Where
Henry and radial wrist
Prevention
Identify and mobilise deliberately; avoid blind retraction.
Median nerve or branch injury
Where
Carpal tunnel and volar wrist
Prevention
Know palmar cutaneous and recurrent motor branch anatomy.
Digital nerve injury
Where
Finger exposures
Prevention
Use full-thickness flaps and identify bundles early.
Tendon adhesions
Where
Hand tendon surgery
Prevention
Gentle handling, pulley preservation, repair quality and early therapy.
Scar sensitivity
Where
Palm and digits
Prevention
Plan incisions away from high-pressure zones when possible.
Complications to Prevent
RiskWherePrevention
PIN palsyThompson/proximal radiusPronate forearm, respect supinator, avoid blind proximal dissection.
Radial artery injuryHenry and radial wristIdentify and mobilise deliberately; avoid blind retraction.
Median nerve or branch injuryCarpal tunnel and volar wristKnow palmar cutaneous and recurrent motor branch anatomy.
Digital nerve injuryFinger exposuresUse full-thickness flaps and identify bundles early.
Tendon adhesionsHand tendon surgeryGentle handling, pulley preservation, repair quality and early therapy.
Scar sensitivityPalm and digitsPlan incisions away from high-pressure zones when possible.
When to extend

Extend when reduction, tendon retrieval, nerve identification or implant safety cannot be achieved through the current window.

When to stop

Stop when the nerve is not found, tendon glide is compromised, skin viability is doubtful or image intensifier views are inadequate.

Differential of Approach Choice


When the target is decided, the remaining decision is which window minimises the structure at greatest risk. The table below compares the competing approaches surgeons actually weigh against each other in the exam and in theatre.

Distal radius fracture
Option A
Volar (Henry-type, FCR) plate
Option B
Dorsal plate
Deciding Factor
Volar fixation lowers tendon-irritation risk but carries higher median-nerve/CTS risk; dorsal lowers neuropathy but irritates extensors (Wei 2013).
Proximal third radius fracture
Option A
Thompson (dorsal)
Option B
Henry extended proximally
Deciding Factor
Both expose the PIN in supinator; Thompson splits supinator over the nerve, Henry's distal volar exposure is safer but proximal radius access is limited.
Carpal tunnel syndrome
Option A
Open release
Option B
Endoscopic release
Deciding Factor
Endoscopic gives faster return to work and less scar pain but higher transient nerve injury; equivalent permanent injury and symptom relief (Li 2020, Koong 2022).
Both-bone forearm fracture
Option A
Single incision per bone
Option B
Reduce/plate to restore radial bow
Deciding Factor
Outcome tracks restoration of radial bow magnitude and location, not the skin incision (Schemitsch 1992).
Zone II flexor laceration
Option A
Bruner zig-zag
Option B
Mid-lateral
Deciding Factor
Bruner gives wide central exposure; mid-lateral keeps the scar off the volar pad and crease but limits dorsal-to-bundle access. Both must vent A2/A4 judiciously (Douwes 2025).
Choosing Between Competing Exposures
Clinical ProblemOption AOption BDeciding Factor
Distal radius fractureVolar (Henry-type, FCR) plateDorsal plateVolar fixation lowers tendon-irritation risk but carries higher median-nerve/CTS risk; dorsal lowers neuropathy but irritates extensors (Wei 2013).
Proximal third radius fractureThompson (dorsal)Henry extended proximallyBoth expose the PIN in supinator; Thompson splits supinator over the nerve, Henry's distal volar exposure is safer but proximal radius access is limited.
Carpal tunnel syndromeOpen releaseEndoscopic releaseEndoscopic gives faster return to work and less scar pain but higher transient nerve injury; equivalent permanent injury and symptom relief (Li 2020, Koong 2022).
Both-bone forearm fractureSingle incision per boneReduce/plate to restore radial bowOutcome tracks restoration of radial bow magnitude and location, not the skin incision (Schemitsch 1992).
Zone II flexor lacerationBruner zig-zagMid-lateralBruner gives wide central exposure; mid-lateral keeps the scar off the volar pad and crease but limits dorsal-to-bundle access. Both must vent A2/A4 judiciously (Douwes 2025).

Evidence Base


Evidence

Radial bow restoration drives forearm function

Level IV
Schemitsch EH, Richards RR • J Bone Joint Surg Am (1992)
Key Findings:
  • Restoration of the normal magnitude AND location of the radial bow correlated with a good functional result (over 80 percent of normal rotation, p less than 0.05).
  • Recovery of grip strength was associated with restoring the location of the radial bow toward normal (p less than 0.005).
  • 84 percent achieved excellent, good or acceptable function by Grace and Eversmann criteria.
Finding: Retrospective cohort, 55 adults, mean 6-year follow-up
Clinical implication: The forearm approach exists to restore the radial bow; an incision that does not allow accurate bow reduction is the wrong approach.
Verify on PubMed (PMID 1522093)
Evidence

PIN landmark in the proximal radius

Level V
Hackl M, Wegmann K, Lappen S, et al. • Injury (2015)
Key Findings:
  • On a ventral approach the PIN runs about 10 mm proximal to the radial tuberosity in supination and about 5 mm distal to it in pronation.
  • Laterally, pronation increases the PIN-to-tuberosity distance to roughly 3 cm.
  • The radial tuberosity is a reliable intraoperative landmark for orientation to the nerve.
Finding: Cadaveric 3D radiographic study, 6 fresh-frozen specimens
Clinical implication: Use the radial tuberosity to anticipate PIN position and pronate the forearm to displace the nerve away from a lateral or dorsal proximal exposure.
Verify on PubMed (PMID 25677826)
Evidence

PIN position shifts with rotation and trauma

Level V
Calfee RP, Wilson JM, Wong AHW • J Bone Joint Surg Am (2011)
Key Findings:
  • In neutral the PIN crossed the radius a mean of 4.2 cm distal to the radiocapitellar joint; pronation increased this to 5.6 cm and supination decreased it to 3.2 cm.
  • After a simulated diaphyseal fracture the protective effect of pronation was largely lost (shift fell from 2.13 cm to 0.24 cm).
  • Following a simulated Essex-Lopresti injury the nerve migrated proximally toward the capitellum in all positions.
Finding: Cadaveric study, 20 upper extremities, Thompson approach
Clinical implication: Pronation cannot be trusted to protect the PIN once the radius is fractured or shortened; direct visualisation is mandatory in the traumatised proximal radius.
Verify on PubMed (PMID 21209272)
Evidence

Endoscopic versus open carpal tunnel release

Level I
Li Y, Luo W, Wu G, et al. • BMC Musculoskelet Disord (2020)
Key Findings:
  • Endoscopic release gave higher satisfaction, greater key pinch strength and earlier return to work (mean 7.25 days sooner) with fewer scar-related complications.
  • Endoscopic release carried a higher transient nerve injury rate (OR 4.87, 95 percent CI 1.37-17.25).
  • Permanent nerve injury did not differ significantly between techniques (OR 1.93, 95 percent CI 0.58-6.40).
Finding: Systematic review and meta-analysis of 28 randomized controlled trials
Clinical implication: Endoscopic and open release are both valid; the trade-off is faster recovery and less scar pain against a higher transient nerve-injury risk and a real learning curve.
Verify on PubMed (PMID 32340621)
Evidence

Open versus single- or dual-portal endoscopic release

Level I
Koong DP, An VVG, Nandapalan H, et al. • Hand (N Y) (2022)
Key Findings:
  • Endoscopic release showed a higher incidence of transient postoperative nerve injury regardless of portal number, but equivalent overall complication and re-operation rates.
  • Dual-portal release reduced scar tenderness compared with single-portal and open methods.
  • Pillar pain, symptom relief and patient-reported satisfaction did not differ significantly between groups.
Finding: Meta-analysis of 23 randomized controlled trials
Clinical implication: The choice of open, single-portal or dual-portal is driven by surgeon familiarity and the learning curve rather than by a decisive difference in cure rate.
Verify on PubMed (PMID 35179060)
Evidence

Zone II flexor tendon repair: evidence-based principles

Level V
Douwes TA, Bulstra AEJ, Buijze GA • Hand Surg Rehabil (2025)
Key Findings:
  • Repair should use a four-strand or multi-strand core suture, with or without an epitendinous suture.
  • Judicious pulley venting (including parts of A2/A4) is safe and effective when needed for glide.
  • Early controlled mobilisation, passive or active, is the cornerstone of management and reduces adhesion formation.
Finding: Systematic review addressing eight key clinical questions
Clinical implication: The zone II exposure must allow a strong multi-strand repair and permit controlled pulley venting, because the rehabilitation plan is inseparable from the surgical approach.
Verify on PubMed (PMID 40769262)
Evidence

Dorsal versus volar plating complication profile

Level I
Wei J, Yang TB, Luo W, et al. • J Int Med Res (2013)
Key Findings:
  • Overall complication rates did not differ between volar and dorsal fixation.
  • Volar fixation increased neuropathy (RR 2.19) and carpal tunnel syndrome (RR 4.56) but reduced tendon irritation (RR 0.38).
  • Dorsal fixation lowered neuropathy at the cost of higher tendon-irritation risk.
Finding: Meta-analysis of 12 trials, 952 patients
Clinical implication: The volar (Henry-type) versus dorsal decision is a trade of nerve risk against tendon-irritation risk, not a difference in overall outcome.
Verify on PubMed (PMID 23569022)
Evidence

AO Foundation / AO Surgery Reference — forearm and wrist exposures

Guideline
AO Foundation • AO Surgery Reference (Davos) (Current)
Key Findings:
  • Anterior (Henry) approach is the workhorse for the radial shaft and distal radius; the dorsal (Thompson) approach is reserved for proximal/dorsal radius with deliberate PIN identification.
  • Restore length, axial and rotational alignment and the radial bow for diaphyseal forearm fractures.
  • The subcutaneous border of the ulna is exposed with minimal periosteal stripping to protect blood supply.
Finding: International consensus operative technique reference
Clinical implication: Society operative references converge on interval-based, nerve-protecting exposure with biological soft-tissue handling rather than wide stripping.

Viva Scenarios

Practise clinical reasoning and management decisions out loud

Viva scenarioStandard
Approach for radial shaft fixation
Clinical prompt

“An adult has a displaced radial shaft fracture requiring plate fixation.”

Viva scenarioChallenging
Flexor tendon exposure
Clinical prompt

“A patient has a zone II flexor tendon laceration requiring repair.”

Viva scenarioChallenging
Open versus endoscopic carpal tunnel release
Clinical prompt

“A patient with electrodiagnostically confirmed carpal tunnel syndrome asks whether you will use an open or endoscopic release.”

Controversies and Areas of Uncertainty


Open vs endoscopic carpal tunnel

Endoscopic release returns patients to work sooner with less scar pain, but randomised evidence shows a higher transient nerve-injury rate and no advantage in permanent injury or symptom relief. The debate is about morbidity and cost, not cure.

Volar vs dorsal distal radius plating

Volar locked plating dominates practice, yet meta-analysis shows it trades lower tendon-irritation risk for higher median-nerve and carpal-tunnel risk versus dorsal plating. Overall outcomes are similar, so fragment pattern and surgeon experience decide.

Pulley venting in zone II

Historic teaching protected A2 and A4 absolutely. Contemporary evidence supports judicious venting of part of A2 or A4 to allow a bulky repair to glide, provided enough pulley is preserved to prevent bowstringing.

WALANT vs tourniquet

Wide-awake local anaesthesia no tourniquet allows intraoperative testing of tendon glide and gapping, but the zone II review found it is not superior in outcome. Its role is pragmatic rather than evidence-mandated.

Answer controversy with the trade-off

Examiners reward candidates who frame a controversy as a balanced trade-off backed by evidence (for example, endoscopic carpal tunnel release: faster recovery versus higher transient nerve injury) rather than dogmatically declaring one option correct.

Guidelines, Registries and Global Practice


These approaches are performed worldwide and the underlying principles are universal, but emphasis and resource access differ by setting.

AO Foundation / AO Surgery Reference
Region
International (Davos)
Position on Approach Selection
Henry (anterior) for radial shaft and distal radius; Thompson (dorsal) for proximal/dorsal radius with PIN identification; minimal-stripping ulnar exposure; restore radial bow.
AAOS
Region
United States
Position on Approach Selection
Evidence-based clinical practice guidance on carpal tunnel syndrome and distal radius fractures; supports both open and endoscopic carpal tunnel release as effective options.
BOA / BSSH (UK)
Region
United Kingdom
Position on Approach Selection
Standards for trauma and hand surgery emphasise complete carpal tunnel release, early protected motion after flexor tendon repair and specialist hand-therapy input.
EFORT / FESSH (Europe)
Region
Europe
Position on Approach Selection
Consensus and instructional content supporting interval-based exposure, multi-strand flexor repair and structured rehabilitation.
Society and Reference Guidance, Side by Side
SourceRegionPosition on Approach Selection
AO Foundation / AO Surgery ReferenceInternational (Davos)Henry (anterior) for radial shaft and distal radius; Thompson (dorsal) for proximal/dorsal radius with PIN identification; minimal-stripping ulnar exposure; restore radial bow.
AAOSUnited StatesEvidence-based clinical practice guidance on carpal tunnel syndrome and distal radius fractures; supports both open and endoscopic carpal tunnel release as effective options.
BOA / BSSH (UK)United KingdomStandards for trauma and hand surgery emphasise complete carpal tunnel release, early protected motion after flexor tendon repair and specialist hand-therapy input.
EFORT / FESSH (Europe)EuropeConsensus and instructional content supporting interval-based exposure, multi-strand flexor repair and structured rehabilitation.
Global epidemiology

Distal radius fractures are among the most common fractures worldwide, with a bimodal distribution (young high-energy and elderly fragility). Carpal tunnel syndrome is the most common compressive neuropathy, affecting roughly 1 to 5 percent of the general adult population. Flexor tendon and digital injuries cluster in working-age men through occupational and machinery trauma.

Registry and outcome data

Hand and wrist procedures are less consistently captured in national arthroplasty registries than hip and knee, but distal radius fracture management is tracked in trauma audits (for example UK trauma audit datasets), which consistently show wide variation in operative versus non-operative management of the elderly distal radius fracture.

High-resource settings

Routine access to mini C-arm imaging, locking-plate systems, hand-therapy services, wrist arthroscopy and endoscopic carpal tunnel equipment. Wide-awake (WALANT) surgery is increasingly used to allow intraoperative tendon-glide testing.

Limited-resource settings

Reliance on open release, conventional plating or non-operative management, with fewer dedicated hand-therapy services. The core principles, interval-based exposure, nerve protection and pulley preservation, remain unchanged and matter even more when revision and therapy are scarce.

Exam day cheat sheet
Forearm, Wrist and Hand Approaches: Decision Sheet

Forearm

  • Henry: volar radius, radial artery and superficial radial nerve awareness.
  • Thompson: dorsal/proximal radius, PIN risk.
  • Ulna: subcutaneous border, preserve soft tissue.

Wrist

  • Carpal tunnel: avoid palmar cutaneous and recurrent motor branches.
  • Dorsal wrist: respect extensor compartments and retinaculum.
  • Scaphoid/carpus: approach follows fracture plane and fixation goal.

Hand

  • Use Bruner or midlateral incisions for digital exposure.
  • Identify digital neurovascular bundles.
  • Preserve pulleys and tendon glide.

Must not miss

  • PIN palsy in dorsal proximal radius exposure.
  • Radial artery injury in volar radial exposure.
  • Incomplete carpal tunnel release.
  • Digital nerve injury and tendon adhesions.
Editorially reviewed — transparent references and correction processPublished by OrthoVellum Medical Education TeamEditorial boardMethodologyReview policy
Educational disclosure

Educational content is reviewed for source visibility, editorial coherence, and correction readiness.

No individual clinician credential is claimed unless a named person is shown.

Verify before clinical use; this is not medical advice or a substitute for local guidance.

Procedure console
6 min
Read
0
Sections
advanced
Level
Peer-reviewed · 2026-06-02
Procedure info
Level
advanced
Updated
2026-06-02
Browse all procedures