Skip to main content
OrthoVellumOrthopaedic Exam Prep
Pricing
About OrthoVellum
OrthoVellum
A living orthopaedic atlas

Exam-focused orthopaedic references, a question bank, viva practice, and spaced-repetition revision — with every clinical claim traceable to its source. Content is educational only and is not a substitute for local supervision, clinical judgement, or institutional policy.


Library

  • Clinical Topics
  • Blog
  • Exam Frequency Index
  • Site Updates
  • Content Methodology

Company

  • About Us
  • Authors & Disclosure
  • Editorial Team
  • Editorial Policy
  • Advertising Policy

Legal

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Medical Disclaimer
  • Copyright & DMCA

Support

  • Support OrthoVellum
  • Help Center
  • Contact
  • Accessibility
Evidence. Clarity. Practice.

© 2026 OrthoVellum. For educational purposes only.

Not medical advice. Verify clinically important information against current local guidance.

Surgical Approaches to the Shoulder and Elbow

Operative SurgeryApproaches & Principles
Approaches & PrinciplesAdvanced

Surgical Approaches to the Shoulder and Elbow

An advanced orthopaedic guide to choosing and describing surgical approaches around the shoulder, proximal humerus and elbow, including anatomy, exposure selection, operative steps, complications and evidence.

Procedure console
15 min
Read
0
Sections
advanced
Level
Peer-reviewed · 2026-06-01

Surgical Approaches to the Shoulder and Elbow

High-yield overview

Choose the exposure that reaches the pathology while protecting function

Targetpathology determines the exposure
Nervename the danger nerve before incision
Repairclosure protects stability and power
Approach Families
Shoulder joint
PatternDeltopectoral, superior or posterior exposures depending on pathology.
TreatmentCommon targets include arthroplasty, instability, proximal humerus fracture and posterior glenoid work.
Proximal humerus
PatternDeltopectoral, deltoid-splitting, anterolateral or posterior humeral extensions.
TreatmentChosen by tuberosity involvement, head access, implant plan and axillary nerve safety.
Lateral elbow
PatternKocher, Kaplan and extensile lateral exposures.
TreatmentUsed for radial head, capitellum, lateral column, instability and selected fracture-dislocation patterns.
Distal humerus and medial elbow
PatternPosterior, medial, paratricipital, triceps-splitting, triceps-reflecting and olecranon osteotomy exposures.
TreatmentChosen by articular visualisation requirement, ulnar nerve status, triceps management and fixation plan.
Critical Must-Knows
  • Do not describe an approach as a skin incision only. A safe answer includes position, landmarks, interval, danger structures, exposure target and repair.
  • Deltopectoral shoulder exposure is a true internervous plane between deltoid and pectoralis major, but cephalic vein, musculocutaneous nerve and axillary nerve still matter.
  • Deltoid-splitting exposure is limited by the axillary nerve on the deep surface of deltoid; excessive distal extension risks deltoid paralysis.
  • Lateral elbow exposure requires deliberate choice between Kocher and Kaplan, with specific attention to the posterior interosseous nerve and lateral ligament complex.
  • Posterior distal humerus exposure is a triceps-management decision: triceps-sparing, triceps split, triceps reflection or olecranon osteotomy.
Clinical Pearls
  • “
    A named approach is not enough. Explain why that approach reaches the specific target better than the alternatives.
  • “
    For shoulder surgery, loss of deltoid, cuff or subscapularis function can be more disabling than the scar.
  • “
    For elbow surgery, the approach must preserve stability and allow early motion; stiffness is a major enemy.
  • “
    If a ligament or tendon insertion is divided for exposure, the repair is part of the operation, not an optional closing step.
The approach can create the complication

Wrong exposure, excessive retraction, missed nerve baseline, poor soft-tissue repair or inadequate articular visualisation can cause the failure. The safest approach is the one that gives enough access without sacrificing the structures needed for postoperative function.

Flowchart for choosing shoulder and elbow exposure by operative target
Approach selection starts with the target: shoulder joint, proximal humerus, lateral elbow or distal humerus. The target determines the approach family.Credit: OrthoVellum

At a Glance Table


Shoulder arthroplasty
Common target
Glenohumeral joint and proximal humerus
Approach options
Deltopectoral most common; superior or posterior in selected cases
Main danger
Subscapularis failure, axillary nerve injury, instability
Anterior instability surgery
Common target
Capsulolabral complex and subscapularis interval
Approach options
Deltopectoral open exposure or arthroscopic portals
Main danger
Musculocutaneous nerve, axillary nerve, subscapularis management
Greater tuberosity or selected proximal humerus fixation
Common target
Lateral proximal humerus and rotator cuff insertion
Approach options
Deltoid-splitting or deltopectoral depending fracture pattern
Main danger
Axillary nerve and deltoid dysfunction
Radial head or capitellum fracture
Common target
Radiocapitellar joint
Approach options
Kocher or Kaplan lateral elbow approach
Main danger
Posterior interosseous nerve and LUCL
Coronoid or medial elbow pathology
Common target
Medial trochlea, coronoid, sublime tubercle, MCL
Approach options
Medial approach through or around flexor-pronator mass
Main danger
Ulnar nerve and medial antebrachial cutaneous nerve
Complex distal humerus fracture
Common target
Articular surface and both columns
Approach options
Posterior approach with triceps-sparing, triceps split, triceps reflection or olecranon osteotomy
Main danger
Ulnar nerve, triceps dysfunction, osteotomy complications and stiffness
Shoulder and Elbow Approach Selection
ProblemCommon targetApproach optionsMain danger
Shoulder arthroplastyGlenohumeral joint and proximal humerusDeltopectoral most common; superior or posterior in selected casesSubscapularis failure, axillary nerve injury, instability
Anterior instability surgeryCapsulolabral complex and subscapularis intervalDeltopectoral open exposure or arthroscopic portalsMusculocutaneous nerve, axillary nerve, subscapularis management
Greater tuberosity or selected proximal humerus fixationLateral proximal humerus and rotator cuff insertionDeltoid-splitting or deltopectoral depending fracture patternAxillary nerve and deltoid dysfunction
Radial head or capitellum fractureRadiocapitellar jointKocher or Kaplan lateral elbow approachPosterior interosseous nerve and LUCL
Coronoid or medial elbow pathologyMedial trochlea, coronoid, sublime tubercle, MCLMedial approach through or around flexor-pronator massUlnar nerve and medial antebrachial cutaneous nerve
Complex distal humerus fractureArticular surface and both columnsPosterior approach with triceps-sparing, triceps split, triceps reflection or olecranon osteotomyUlnar nerve, triceps dysfunction, osteotomy complications and stiffness
Mnemonic

SAFERDescribe Any Upper Limb Approach

S
Set-up
Position, table, arm support, tourniquet, imaging and access for reduction.
A
Anatomy
Landmarks, interval, nerve supply and structures at risk.
F
Field
What part of the joint or bone must be seen and why.
E
Extension
How to safely extend exposure or change plan if the target is not reached.
R
Repair
Capsule, tendon, ligament, triceps, subscapularis or deltoid closure.

Hook:A good approach answer should be safe before it is detailed.

Mnemonic

AMURUpper Limb Nerve Check

A
Axillary
Shoulder and deltoid-splitting approaches.
M
Musculocutaneous
Deep medial retraction in anterior shoulder exposure.
U
Ulnar
Medial and posterior elbow exposure.
R
Radial/PIN
Lateral elbow, humeral shaft and distal extension.

Hook:Before shoulder and elbow surgery, know the nerve at risk.

Overview/Epidemiology


Shoulder and elbow approaches are common in trauma, arthroplasty, instability, sports surgery, reconstruction and infection surgery. They are high-yield because a small technical error can produce a large functional problem: deltoid weakness, subscapularis failure, elbow instability, ulnar neuropathy, posterior interosseous nerve palsy, triceps insufficiency or disabling stiffness.

The approach must be chosen from the problem, not from habit. A deltopectoral shoulder exposure is versatile, but it is not the best answer for every proximal humerus target. A lateral elbow approach is logical for radial head and capitellar work, but a complex distal humerus fracture may need posterior articular visualisation. A posterior elbow incision can be combined with several different triceps strategies, each with different exposure and morbidity.

Good approach planning answers three questions:

  • What must be exposed? Joint, column, tuberosity, glenoid, coronoid, radial head, humeral shaft or implant.
  • What must be protected? Nerve, vessel, tendon, ligament, cuff, deltoid, triceps and skin envelope.
  • What must be repaired? Subscapularis, capsule, rotator interval, LUCL, MCL, triceps or olecranon osteotomy.
The exposure should match the operation

Do not choose an approach because it is familiar. Choose it because it gives direct access to the reduction, implant, reconstruction or debridement target with acceptable risk.

Anatomy/Biomechanics


The shoulder and elbow are soft-tissue dependent joints. The shoulder depends on the deltoid, rotator cuff, subscapularis, capsule and glenoid version; the elbow depends on congruent articular anatomy, collateral ligaments, capsule, triceps and early motion. An approach that damages these structures can compromise the reconstruction.

Table of structures at risk in deltopectoral, deltoid split, lateral elbow and medial elbow approaches
Danger structures should be identified before the incision. This image is deliberately table-based rather than a labelled anatomy map because inaccurate leader-line anatomy is unsafe.Credit: OrthoVellum

Shoulder region

Key structures:

  • Cephalic vein: marks the deltopectoral interval; it may be taken medially or laterally depending preference and exposure.
  • Deltoid: primary power muscle for elevation; denervation or detachment failure is disabling.
  • Pectoralis major: medial boundary of the deltopectoral interval.
  • Conjoint tendon: landmark for deep anterior shoulder exposure; excessive medial retraction risks musculocutaneous nerve traction.
  • Subscapularis: must be managed carefully in arthroplasty and instability surgery; failure causes weakness, pain and anterior instability.
  • Axillary nerve: at risk with inferior shoulder dissection, deltoid splitting and aggressive retraction.
  • Rotator cuff footprint: critical during tuberosity fixation, cuff repair and proximal humerus surgery.

Elbow region

Key structures:

  • Ulnar nerve: vulnerable in medial and posterior elbow exposure; preoperative symptoms must be documented.
  • Posterior interosseous nerve: vulnerable during lateral elbow approaches, radial neck work and distal extension.
  • Lateral ulnar collateral ligament: protects against posterolateral rotatory instability; if released, it must be repaired.
  • Medial collateral ligament: primary valgus stabiliser; important in medial elbow exposure and coronoid work.
  • Triceps: posterior exposure strategy determines articular visualisation and postoperative extension strength.
  • Capsule: release improves exposure but can destabilise the elbow if collateral structures are not repaired.
Function is part of the anatomy

The deltoid, subscapularis, LUCL, MCL and triceps are not simply structures crossed during exposure. They are functional stabilisers and power units. If they are divided, their repair must be planned before they are divided.

Internervous Plane


shoulder and elbow surgical approaches internervous planes
Internervous planes: deltopectoral (axillary n. vs pectoral nn.), posterior shoulder/Judet (suprascapular vs axillary n.), Kocher lateral elbow (radial n. vs posterior interosseous n.).Credit: OrthoVellum illustration

Internervous planes matter because they allow exposure without denervating a muscle group. Some approaches use true internervous intervals; others are muscle-splitting or tendon-reflecting approaches that are safe only if the split is limited and the repair is reliable.

Deltopectoral shoulder
Plane
Deltoid supplied by axillary nerve; pectoralis major supplied by pectoral nerves
Practical consequence
True internervous interval, but deep retraction still risks musculocutaneous and axillary nerves
Deltoid-splitting proximal humerus
Plane
Muscle split through deltoid fibres
Practical consequence
Not a full internervous plane; distal split is limited by axillary nerve
Posterior shoulder
Plane
Deltoid/cuff split or interval depending technique
Practical consequence
Useful for posterior glenoid and scapular work; protect axillary and suprascapular nerve regions
Kocher elbow
Plane
Anconeus and ECU
Practical consequence
Common lateral elbow interval; protect PIN and preserve or repair LUCL
Kaplan elbow
Plane
ECRB and EDC
Practical consequence
More anterior radiocapitellar access; PIN risk increases with distal/anterior dissection
Posterior elbow
Plane
Triceps management strategy rather than a single internervous plane
Practical consequence
Exposure depends on triceps-sparing, triceps split, reflection or olecranon osteotomy
Intervals and Planes
ApproachPlanePractical consequence
Deltopectoral shoulderDeltoid supplied by axillary nerve; pectoralis major supplied by pectoral nervesTrue internervous interval, but deep retraction still risks musculocutaneous and axillary nerves
Deltoid-splitting proximal humerusMuscle split through deltoid fibresNot a full internervous plane; distal split is limited by axillary nerve
Posterior shoulderDeltoid/cuff split or interval depending techniqueUseful for posterior glenoid and scapular work; protect axillary and suprascapular nerve regions
Kocher elbowAnconeus and ECUCommon lateral elbow interval; protect PIN and preserve or repair LUCL
Kaplan elbowECRB and EDCMore anterior radiocapitellar access; PIN risk increases with distal/anterior dissection
Posterior elbowTriceps management strategy rather than a single internervous planeExposure depends on triceps-sparing, triceps split, reflection or olecranon osteotomy
An interval is not a permission slip

Even a true internervous plane can become unsafe if retraction is aggressive, the incision is extended in the wrong direction, or the surgeon forgets the deep nerve course.

Clinical Assessment


The preoperative assessment should decide whether the planned approach is safe and adequate.

History

  • Previous operations, scars, infection, instability surgery, arthroplasty or fracture fixation.
  • Current pathology: trauma, arthritis, instability, cuff disease, infection, tumour or nonunion.
  • Neurological symptoms: deltoid weakness, lateral arm numbness, ulnar nerve paraesthesia, radial/PIN weakness.
  • Functional requirements: overhead work, sport, manual labour, transfers, walking aid use.
  • Anticoagulation, diabetes, smoking, inflammatory disease and wound-healing risk.

Examination

  • Shoulder: deltoid function, axillary sensation, cuff strength, subscapularis tests, active and passive range, instability signs and skin condition.
  • Elbow: range of motion, ulnar nerve symptoms, intrinsic hand function, PIN function, collateral stability, swelling, open wounds and soft-tissue envelope.
  • Trauma: vascular status, compartments, open wounds, contamination, associated fractures and reduction urgency.

What must be documented

  • Baseline nerve function before surgery.
  • Skin scars and intended incision relationship.
  • Vascular status.
  • Open-wound location and whether it conflicts with definitive exposure.
  • Active motion and stiffness, especially at the elbow.

Investigations


Imaging should answer the exposure question, not just confirm the diagnosis.

Radiographs

  • Shoulder trauma series: AP, scapular Y and axillary or modified axillary view.
  • Elbow AP and lateral views, with radiocapitellar and ulnohumeral alignment.
  • True lateral elbow radiographs for dislocation, coronoid, olecranon and distal humerus work.
  • Long humerus views when shaft extension or radial nerve risk is relevant.

CT

CT is especially useful for:

  • proximal humerus fracture pattern and tuberosity involvement
  • glenoid bone loss or posterior glenoid deformity
  • scapula and glenoid fractures
  • distal humerus articular comminution
  • radial head and capitellar fractures
  • coronoid fracture morphology
  • preoperative planning for osteotomy or revision implants

MRI and ultrasound

MRI is useful when rotator cuff, subscapularis, labrum, capsule, infection extension or muscle quality changes the operation. Ultrasound can assess cuff integrity in selected patients but does not replace CT for fracture morphology.

Use imaging to prove the approach

If the plan is a lateral elbow approach, imaging should show that the target is lateral or radiocapitellar. If the plan is posterior distal humerus exposure, CT should justify the need for articular visualisation and column fixation.

Approach Selection


Elbow exposure selection matrix for radial head, coronoid and distal humerus articular surface
Elbow exposure is target-driven. Radial head and capitellum commonly use lateral approaches, coronoid and medial-sided pathology often require medial access, and complex distal humerus fractures require a posterior triceps strategy.Credit: OrthoVellum

Shoulder approach selection

Primary shoulder arthroplasty
Preferred exposure
Deltopectoral
Why
Reliable anterior access to humeral head, glenoid and subscapularis management
Avoid if
Severe anterior scarring or unusual pathology requiring posterior access
Open anterior instability
Preferred exposure
Deltopectoral
Why
Access to subscapularis, capsule and anterior glenoid
Avoid if
Poor soft tissues or arthroscopic procedure preferred
Isolated greater tuberosity fixation
Preferred exposure
Deltoid-splitting or deltopectoral
Why
Lateral split gives direct tuberosity access; deltopectoral is more extensile
Avoid if
Complex fracture requiring head, lesser tuberosity or arthroplasty access
Three-part or four-part proximal humerus fracture
Preferred exposure
Usually deltopectoral
Why
Better anterior access to tuberosities, head, bicipital groove and conversion options
Avoid if
Poor soft tissue may require staged or alternative strategy
Posterior glenoid or scapular pathology
Preferred exposure
Posterior shoulder or Judet-type exposure
Why
Direct posterior access
Avoid if
Anterior pathology alone
Shoulder and Proximal Humerus Choices
TargetPreferred exposureWhyAvoid if
Primary shoulder arthroplastyDeltopectoralReliable anterior access to humeral head, glenoid and subscapularis managementSevere anterior scarring or unusual pathology requiring posterior access
Open anterior instabilityDeltopectoralAccess to subscapularis, capsule and anterior glenoidPoor soft tissues or arthroscopic procedure preferred
Isolated greater tuberosity fixationDeltoid-splitting or deltopectoralLateral split gives direct tuberosity access; deltopectoral is more extensileComplex fracture requiring head, lesser tuberosity or arthroplasty access
Three-part or four-part proximal humerus fractureUsually deltopectoralBetter anterior access to tuberosities, head, bicipital groove and conversion optionsPoor soft tissue may require staged or alternative strategy
Posterior glenoid or scapular pathologyPosterior shoulder or Judet-type exposureDirect posterior accessAnterior pathology alone

Elbow approach selection

Radial head
Preferred exposure
Kocher or Kaplan
Why
Direct radiocapitellar access
Key risk
PIN injury, LUCL injury
Capitellum
Preferred exposure
Kaplan or extensile lateral
Why
More anterior radiocapitellar visualisation
Key risk
PIN with distal anterior dissection
Coronoid anteromedial facet
Preferred exposure
Medial approach through or around FCU/flexor-pronator mass
Why
Direct access to medial coronoid and sublime tubercle
Key risk
Ulnar nerve and MCL
Distal humerus articular surface
Preferred exposure
Posterior approach with chosen triceps strategy
Why
Bicolumnar fixation and articular reduction
Key risk
Ulnar nerve, triceps morbidity, stiffness
Simple olecranon fracture
Preferred exposure
Posterior subcutaneous approach
Why
Direct access to olecranon
Key risk
Prominent metalwork and wound problems
Elbow Approach Choices
TargetPreferred exposureWhyKey risk
Radial headKocher or KaplanDirect radiocapitellar accessPIN injury, LUCL injury
CapitellumKaplan or extensile lateralMore anterior radiocapitellar visualisationPIN with distal anterior dissection
Coronoid anteromedial facetMedial approach through or around FCU/flexor-pronator massDirect access to medial coronoid and sublime tubercleUlnar nerve and MCL
Distal humerus articular surfacePosterior approach with chosen triceps strategyBicolumnar fixation and articular reductionUlnar nerve, triceps morbidity, stiffness
Simple olecranon fracturePosterior subcutaneous approachDirect access to olecranonProminent metalwork and wound problems

Patient Positioning


Positioning must allow exposure, reduction, imaging, implant insertion and safe anaesthesia access. A perfect incision is not enough if fluoroscopy, reduction tools or the assistant cannot work.

Illustration showing lateral and prone positioning options for distal humerus and posterior elbow surgery
Posterior elbow and distal humerus surgery can be performed in lateral or prone positions. The choice depends on anaesthesia, fracture pattern, surgeon preference, imaging access and soft-tissue needs.Credit: Open-access figure via NIH Open-i (CC BY; source article not individually recorded)

Shoulder positioning

  • Beach-chair: common for arthroplasty, instability and cuff surgery; check head, neck, blood pressure and arm access.
  • Supine with bump: useful for deltopectoral exposure and fracture work when fluoroscopy is needed.
  • Lateral decubitus: common for arthroscopy and some posterior work; protect pressure points and brachial plexus traction.
  • Prone or floating shoulder setups: selected scapula and posterior shoulder exposures.

Elbow positioning

  • Supine with arm across chest: useful for lateral elbow, radial head and selected distal humerus work.
  • Lateral decubitus: common for posterior distal humerus exposure; arm supported over bolster.
  • Prone: useful for posterior elbow and distal humerus exposure; confirm anaesthetic and airway access.
  • Hand table or arm board: useful for medial/lateral elbow approaches and fluoroscopy.
Position before prepping

Check fluoroscopy, tourniquet access, reduction manoeuvres, plate trajectory and the planned extension of exposure before the limb is prepared and draped.

Surgical Technique


Universal approach steps

  1. Confirm the procedure, side, imaging and implants.
  2. Review baseline nerve function.
  3. Position the patient and confirm fluoroscopy before preparing the limb.
  4. Mark landmarks and planned extension lines.
  5. Incise through safe skin and subcutaneous planes.
  6. Identify the planned interval before deep dissection.
  7. Protect named nerves and vessels deliberately.
  8. Confirm the exposure reaches the target before committing to fixation or reconstruction.
  9. Repair divided stabilisers, tendons, capsule or osteotomy.
  10. Document the approach, structures protected and repair performed.
The bailout plan should exist before the incision

If a deltoid split is inadequate, do not extend distally into the axillary nerve zone. Convert or extend safely. If a posterior elbow exposure is inadequate, change the triceps strategy deliberately rather than tearing through the interval.

Deltopectoral shoulder approach

Indications

  • Shoulder arthroplasty.
  • Anterior instability surgery.
  • Proximal humerus fracture fixation or arthroplasty.
  • Anterior glenoid, subscapularis and biceps-related procedures.

Position

  • Beach-chair or supine with a shoulder bump.
  • Arm free enough for extension, external rotation and adduction.
  • Fluoroscopy if fracture or implant position requires it.

Landmarks

  • Coracoid.
  • Deltopectoral groove.
  • Clavicle and acromion.
  • Deltoid insertion and anterior axillary fold.

Technique

  1. Incise from near the coracoid distally along the deltopectoral groove.
  2. Identify the cephalic vein and preserve it with either deltoid or pectoral side depending exposure.
  3. Develop the deltopectoral interval bluntly.
  4. Identify the clavipectoral fascia and conjoint tendon.
  5. Retract conjoint tendon medially gently; avoid excessive medial traction.
  6. Manage biceps tendon and rotator interval as required.
  7. Expose subscapularis by tenotomy, peel or lesser tuberosity osteotomy depending operation.
  8. Protect axillary nerve inferiorly during releases and retraction.
  9. Complete the planned reconstruction.
  10. Repair subscapularis and rotator interval as indicated.

Decision points

  • Arthroplasty requires reliable subscapularis management and repair.
  • Fracture surgery may need biceps tenodesis, tuberosity sutures and conversion capacity.
  • Instability surgery must restore capsulolabral stability without over-tightening external rotation.
Surgical Approaches to Shoulder - intraoperative photographs showing deltopectoral incision and deep shoulder exposure.
Surgical Approaches to Shoulder - intraoperative photographs showing deltopectoral incision and deep shoulder exposure.Credit: Open-access figure via NIH Open-i (CC BY; source article not individually recorded)

Deltoid-splitting proximal humerus approach

Indications

  • Isolated greater tuberosity fracture fixation.
  • Selected two-part proximal humerus fractures.
  • Mini-open cuff repair or selected lateral proximal humerus work.

Why it is useful

  • Direct lateral access to the greater tuberosity and lateral proximal humerus.
  • Less anterior soft-tissue dissection than deltopectoral exposure.
  • Can be combined with percutaneous or limited fixation strategies.

Technique

  1. Position in beach-chair, supine or lateral depending target.
  2. Mark the lateral acromion and planned split in line with deltoid fibres.
  3. Keep the split short and controlled.
  4. Split deltoid bluntly in the fibre direction.
  5. Avoid distal extension into the axillary nerve zone.
  6. Use blunt retractors and avoid forceful deep traction.
  7. Expose greater tuberosity, rotator cuff insertion or lateral proximal humerus.
  8. Fix the pathology with the least additional soft-tissue stripping.
  9. Repair deltoid split and any cuff release.

When not to use it alone

  • Complex head-splitting fractures.
  • Lesser tuberosity or subscapularis-dominant fractures.
  • Arthroplasty conversion likely.
  • Revision scarring where axillary nerve location is uncertain.
Do not chase exposure distally through deltoid

If more exposure is needed, widen proximally, convert approach or choose a different exposure. Extending the split distally risks the axillary nerve and deltoid paralysis.

Quantify the Axillary Nerve 'Safe Zone' - the 5-to-7 cm Rule

"Stay out of the axillary nerve zone" is the warning; the examinable substance is where it actually is. The axillary nerve, after exiting the quadrilateral space, runs transversely across the deep surface of the deltoid roughly 5 to 7 cm distal to the lateral border of the acromion (closer - about 5 cm - in smaller patients). Therefore:

  • Keep any deltoid-splitting incision under about 5 cm distal to the acromion, and place a stay/anchoring suture at the inferior apex of the split to stop it propagating distally during retraction.
  • During the deltopectoral and any deltoid-based exposure, the nerve can be identified and protected by palpation on the deep deltoid surface (the "tug test") and traced to the quadrilateral space; it is also at risk inferiorly during inferior capsular releases and glenoid retraction.
  • Remember the nerve's anterior motor branches and the sensory branch to the regimental-badge area - test deltoid and that sensory patch when assessing iatrogenic injury.

Exam point: the axillary nerve crosses the deep deltoid about 5 to 7 cm below the acromion - limit the split to roughly 5 cm, anchor its apex, and palpate/protect the nerve; this single number is what converts a vague warning into a safe operation.

Lateral elbow approaches

Targets

  • Radial head fracture fixation or replacement.
  • Capitellar fracture fixation.
  • Lateral column exposure.
  • LUCL repair or reconstruction.
  • Selected fracture-dislocation procedures.

Kocher interval

  • Plane between anconeus and extensor carpi ulnaris.
  • Commonly used for radial head work.
  • LUCL must be preserved or repaired if released.

Kaplan interval

  • Plane between extensor carpi radialis brevis and extensor digitorum communis.
  • More anterior radiocapitellar access.
  • PIN risk increases with anterior and distal dissection.

Technique principles

  1. Position supine, lateral or prone depending combined work.
  2. Mark lateral epicondyle, radial head and olecranon.
  3. Choose Kocher or Kaplan based on target.
  4. Keep dissection proximal and controlled around radial head.
  5. Manage forearm rotation deliberately to reduce PIN risk according to exposure and surgeon preference.
  6. Identify and protect the lateral ligament complex.
  7. Enter capsule only as needed.
  8. Repair capsule, annular ligament and LUCL if divided.
Lateral elbow stability

A radial head procedure that leaves the LUCL incompetent can convert a fracture operation into posterolateral rotatory instability. Preserve or repair the lateral ligament complex.

Protect the PIN by Pronating the Forearm

"Manage forearm rotation to reduce PIN risk" has a precise, examinable meaning. The posterior interosseous nerve dives into the supinator (arcade of Frohse) and wraps around the proximal radius/radial neck, lying only a short distance (commonly cited as around a few centimetres, roughly a finger-breadth or two) distal to the radiocapitellar joint. Pronating the forearm rotates the PIN anteriorly and medially, moving it away from a lateral approach to the radial head/neck (Kaplan and the anterior part of Kocher) - so keep the forearm pronated during radial neck exposure, plating and retractor placement, and keep dissection proximal/subperiosteal on the radial neck, never wandering distally or placing retractors blindly around the neck.

Conversely, supination protects the PIN during anterior approaches to the proximal radius (it draws the nerve laterally). The unifying rule: rotate the forearm to take the PIN away from your working side - pronate for the lateral/Kaplan radial-neck exposure.

Exam point: in lateral elbow approaches, pronate the forearm to displace the PIN away from the radial neck, stay proximal/subperiosteal, and remember the nerve is only a couple of centimetres distal to the radiocapitellar joint.

Medial elbow approach

The medial approach is chosen when the operative target is genuinely medial: an anteromedial coronoid facet fragment, sublime tubercle, medial collateral ligament, medial epicondyle or ulnar nerve. The incision must be planned around the ulnar nerve and the medial antebrachial cutaneous nerve branches.

Set-up
Action
Position the arm on a hand table or across the chest
Reason
Allows access to medial elbow and fluoroscopy
Landmarks
Action
Mark medial epicondyle, olecranon and ulnar nerve course
Reason
Prevents drifting into the wrong plane
Superficial nerves
Action
Protect medial antebrachial cutaneous branches
Reason
Reduces painful neuroma and sensory symptoms
Ulnar nerve
Action
Identify, decompress, mobilise or transpose only when indicated
Reason
Avoids traction injury and unstable nerve handling
Deep target
Action
Work through or around flexor-pronator mass depending pathology
Reason
Reaches coronoid, MCL or sublime tubercle without unnecessary stripping
Closure
Action
Repair flexor-pronator origin, MCL and nerve bed as required
Reason
Protects stability and postoperative nerve comfort
Medial Elbow Exposure
StepActionReason
Set-upPosition the arm on a hand table or across the chestAllows access to medial elbow and fluoroscopy
LandmarksMark medial epicondyle, olecranon and ulnar nerve coursePrevents drifting into the wrong plane
Superficial nervesProtect medial antebrachial cutaneous branchesReduces painful neuroma and sensory symptoms
Ulnar nerveIdentify, decompress, mobilise or transpose only when indicatedAvoids traction injury and unstable nerve handling
Deep targetWork through or around flexor-pronator mass depending pathologyReaches coronoid, MCL or sublime tubercle without unnecessary stripping
ClosureRepair flexor-pronator origin, MCL and nerve bed as requiredProtects stability and postoperative nerve comfort
Medial elbow exposure is nerve-first surgery

The ulnar nerve strategy should be chosen deliberately. Do not discover the nerve accidentally while chasing a coronoid fragment or medial plate.

Posterior elbow and distal humerus exposure

Posterior elbow exposure is not one approach; it is a posterior skin approach combined with a triceps strategy.

Options

  • Triceps-sparing/paratricipital: preserves extensor mechanism, less articular visualisation.
  • Triceps split: direct posterior exposure, but triceps repair and scarring matter.
  • Triceps-reflecting: improves exposure with tendon repair requirement.
  • Olecranon osteotomy: excellent articular exposure, but adds osteotomy fixation and union risk.
Cadaveric ulna specimens showing olecranon osteotomy line options
Olecranon osteotomy can improve distal humerus articular visualisation, but it creates a second bony problem that must be fixed securely and followed to union.Credit: Open-access figure via NIH Open-i (CC BY; source article not individually recorded)

Technique principles

  1. Position prone, lateral or supine across chest depending preference and associated injuries.
  2. Use a posterior skin incision that avoids direct pressure over the olecranon tip when possible.
  3. Raise full-thickness flaps carefully to protect skin vascularity.
  4. Identify and protect the ulnar nerve when indicated; document the strategy.
  5. Choose triceps management based on articular visualisation requirement.
  6. Reduce and fix the distal humerus with stable bicolumnar strategy when indicated.
  7. Repair triceps or osteotomy securely.
  8. Begin a motion plan that respects fixation and soft-tissue repair.

Choosing the triceps strategy

  • Use triceps-sparing exposure when the articular surface can be reduced without complete visualisation.
  • Use triceps split or reflection when more exposure is needed and triceps repair is reliable.
  • Use olecranon osteotomy when direct articular visualisation is necessary and the osteotomy can be fixed securely.

Complications


Deltopectoral shoulder
Key complications
Cephalic vein bleeding, musculocutaneous traction, axillary nerve injury, subscapularis failure, stiffness
Prevention
Gentle retraction, know nerve course, reliable subscapularis repair, rehabilitation plan
Deltoid split
Key complications
Axillary nerve injury, deltoid weakness, inadequate exposure, cuff injury
Prevention
Limit distal split, blunt dissection, convert if inadequate
Posterior shoulder
Key complications
Axillary or suprascapular nerve risk, deltoid/cuff morbidity, stiffness
Prevention
Precise anatomy, avoid aggressive medial retraction, repair cuff/deltoid
Lateral elbow
Key complications
PIN palsy, LUCL insufficiency, radiocapitellar stiffness, heterotopic ossification
Prevention
Controlled distal dissection, ligament repair, early safe motion
Medial elbow
Key complications
Ulnar neuropathy, MABCN neuroma, valgus instability, stiffness
Prevention
Document baseline, protect cutaneous nerves, plan ulnar nerve handling, repair MCL/flexor-pronator
Posterior elbow
Key complications
Ulnar neuropathy, triceps weakness, olecranon nonunion, prominent metalwork, stiffness
Prevention
Secure nerve strategy, robust triceps/osteotomy repair, early motion when safe
Complications by Approach Family
ApproachKey complicationsPrevention
Deltopectoral shoulderCephalic vein bleeding, musculocutaneous traction, axillary nerve injury, subscapularis failure, stiffnessGentle retraction, know nerve course, reliable subscapularis repair, rehabilitation plan
Deltoid splitAxillary nerve injury, deltoid weakness, inadequate exposure, cuff injuryLimit distal split, blunt dissection, convert if inadequate
Posterior shoulderAxillary or suprascapular nerve risk, deltoid/cuff morbidity, stiffnessPrecise anatomy, avoid aggressive medial retraction, repair cuff/deltoid
Lateral elbowPIN palsy, LUCL insufficiency, radiocapitellar stiffness, heterotopic ossificationControlled distal dissection, ligament repair, early safe motion
Medial elbowUlnar neuropathy, MABCN neuroma, valgus instability, stiffnessDocument baseline, protect cutaneous nerves, plan ulnar nerve handling, repair MCL/flexor-pronator
Posterior elbowUlnar neuropathy, triceps weakness, olecranon nonunion, prominent metalwork, stiffnessSecure nerve strategy, robust triceps/osteotomy repair, early motion when safe

Red flags after surgery

  • New deltoid paralysis or lateral arm numbness.
  • New PIN palsy with finger/thumb extension weakness.
  • Worsening ulnar nerve symptoms.
  • Loss of elbow stability after lateral approach.
  • Inability to actively extend elbow after posterior approach.
  • Wound breakdown over olecranon or shoulder incision.
  • Increasing pain, fever, drainage or acute stiffness suggesting infection or haematoma.

Differentiating a new postoperative nerve deficit

A new motor or sensory deficit after an upper limb approach must be localised quickly, because the differential ranges from a recoverable traction neurapraxia to a divided nerve needing exploration. The pattern of weakness usually points to the nerve at risk for that specific approach.

Axillary
Approach most associated
Deltoid split, inferior shoulder dissection
Typical motor sign
Weak shoulder abduction, deltoid wasting
Sensory sign
Numb lateral upper arm (regimental badge)
Usual cause and action
Traction or split too distal; if no recovery on serial review, image and consider exploration
Posterior interosseous
Approach most associated
Lateral elbow (Kocher / Kaplan)
Typical motor sign
Weak finger and thumb extension, wrist drifts radially (wrist extension preserved)
Sensory sign
No sensory loss (motor nerve)
Usual cause and action
Distal or supinated dissection; observe a neurapraxia, explore if division suspected
Ulnar
Approach most associated
Medial and posterior elbow
Typical motor sign
Weak intrinsics, weak FDP to ring/little finger, clawing
Sensory sign
Numb little and ulnar ring finger
Usual cause and action
Mobilisation, tight transposition or kinking; check construct, may settle by 12 months
Musculocutaneous
Approach most associated
Deltopectoral with deep medial retraction
Typical motor sign
Weak elbow flexion and supination
Sensory sign
Numb lateral forearm
Usual cause and action
Conjoint-tendon over-retraction; usually traction neurapraxia, relieve retraction
Radial (main trunk)
Approach most associated
Distal humeral extension / shaft
Typical motor sign
Wrist drop, weak finger and thumb extension
Sensory sign
Numb dorsal first web space
Usual cause and action
Spiral-groove handling; protect and document, explore if iatrogenic division suspected
Differential of New Postoperative Upper Limb Nerve Deficit
NerveApproach most associatedTypical motor signSensory signUsual cause and action
AxillaryDeltoid split, inferior shoulder dissectionWeak shoulder abduction, deltoid wastingNumb lateral upper arm (regimental badge)Traction or split too distal; if no recovery on serial review, image and consider exploration
Posterior interosseousLateral elbow (Kocher / Kaplan)Weak finger and thumb extension, wrist drifts radially (wrist extension preserved)No sensory loss (motor nerve)Distal or supinated dissection; observe a neurapraxia, explore if division suspected
UlnarMedial and posterior elbowWeak intrinsics, weak FDP to ring/little finger, clawingNumb little and ulnar ring fingerMobilisation, tight transposition or kinking; check construct, may settle by 12 months
MusculocutaneousDeltopectoral with deep medial retractionWeak elbow flexion and supinationNumb lateral forearmConjoint-tendon over-retraction; usually traction neurapraxia, relieve retraction
Radial (main trunk)Distal humeral extension / shaftWrist drop, weak finger and thumb extensionNumb dorsal first web spaceSpiral-groove handling; protect and document, explore if iatrogenic division suspected

Postoperative Care


Postoperative care depends on what was repaired, not only on the skin approach.

Shoulder

  • Protect subscapularis repair after arthroplasty or instability surgery according to repair method.
  • Monitor axillary nerve and deltoid function.
  • Start passive and active-assisted motion according to reconstruction stability.
  • Avoid early resisted internal rotation after subscapularis repair.
  • Follow fracture fixation or arthroplasty radiographs when indicated.

Elbow

  • Balance soft-tissue healing against the high risk of stiffness.
  • Check ulnar, radial/PIN and median nerve function after surgery.
  • Use a hinged brace when stability or ligament repair requires protection.
  • Begin controlled motion as early as fixation and soft-tissue repair permit.
  • Monitor olecranon osteotomy fixation, triceps repair and wound pressure points.
The elbow hates immobilisation

The elbow stiffens quickly. A good operation includes a realistic motion plan that protects fixation and repair while avoiding unnecessary prolonged immobilisation.

Outcomes/Prognosis


Outcomes are determined by pathology, patient factors, surgical execution and rehabilitation. The approach contributes by enabling reduction or reconstruction while minimising additional morbidity.

Shoulder outcomes depend on restoration of stable arthroplasty mechanics, tuberosity/cuff healing, subscapularis function, deltoid function and avoidance of nerve injury. A well-executed deltopectoral approach is repeatable and versatile, but poor subscapularis management can create pain, weakness and instability. A deltoid split can be efficient for lateral targets, but nerve injury is a major failure.

Elbow outcomes depend on articular reduction, stability, ulnar nerve status, triceps function and early motion. For distal humerus fractures, an exposure that gives inadequate articular visualisation can compromise reduction; an exposure that gives excellent visualisation but creates triceps or osteotomy morbidity must be justified and repaired well.

Evidence Base


Evidence

Surgical Exposures of the Shoulder

Level V (Narrative review)
Chalmers PN, Van Thiel GS, Trenhaile SW • Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (2016)
Key Findings:
  • Open shoulder surgery is challenging because the deltoid and rotator cuff envelop the joint, and in most approaches exposure is limited by the proximity and importance of the axillary nerve.
  • Deltopectoral, deltoid-splitting and posterior approaches each have distinct advantages, disadvantages and risks, with variations and extensions of each.
  • Mastery of all three exposures gives the surgeon flexibility to address the widest variety of pathology.
Clinical implication: Shoulder approach teaching should focus on pathology-specific exposure and protection of deltoid, cuff and axillary nerve function.
Verify on PubMed (PMID 26918414)
Evidence

Surgical Exposures of the Humerus

Level V (Narrative review)
Zlotolow DA, Catalano LW 3rd, Barron OA, Glickel SZ • Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (2006)
Key Findings:
  • No truly safe fully extensile approach to the humerus exists because the spiralling radial nerve crosses the posterior midshaft; the nerve must be mobilised at the spiral groove for maximal exposure.
  • The anterolateral approach uses an internervous plane between axillary and deltoid nerves proximally and radial and musculocutaneous nerves distally; deltopectoral remains the most widely used proximal exposure.
  • Distal intra-articular exposure depends on triceps mobilisation by olecranon osteotomy or triceps release, coupled with triceps-splitting or paratricipital extension.
Clinical implication: When extending shoulder exposure into the humerus, the radial and axillary nerve courses must be considered before any distal extension.
Verify on PubMed (PMID 17148623)
Evidence

Subscapularis tenotomy versus lesser tuberosity osteotomy in TSA (RCT)

Level I (Randomised controlled trial)
Levine WN, Munoz J, Hsu S, Byram IR, Bigliani LU, Ahmad CS, et al. • Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery (2019)
Key Findings:
  • 60 shoulders randomised to subscapularis tenotomy or lesser tuberosity osteotomy during anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty for primary osteoarthritis.
  • No significant difference in range of motion or clinical outcome scores at one year between the two techniques.
  • Lesser tuberosity osteotomy healed more reliably (bone-to-bone union in 93.1%) than tenotomy (no full-thickness tear in 86.7% on ultrasound), but added operative and repair time.
Clinical implication: Subscapularis management during the deltopectoral approach is a deliberate decision: both tenotomy and lesser tuberosity osteotomy give comparable function, but the chosen technique must be repaired securely and protected in rehabilitation.
Verify on PubMed (PMID 30771825)
Evidence

Acromion-axillary nerve distance: safe zone for the deltoid-splitting approach

Level II (Prospective clinical study)
Yildirim C, Demirel M, Bayram E, Ekinci M, Yilmaz M • Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research (2022)
Key Findings:
  • In 37 patients undergoing proximal humerus fixation, mean acromion-axillary nerve distance was 6 cm (range 5.5-6.6 cm) and the axillary nerve index (nerve distance / arm length) averaged 0.18.
  • The axillary nerve position was predictable from anatomy in only 18% of patients, underlining wide individual variation.
  • A zone of 5.5 cm distal to the anterolateral edge of the acromion can be regarded as the safe limit for an anterolateral deltoid-splitting incision.
Clinical implication: Keep the deltoid split within roughly 5 cm of the acromion; beyond this, deliberately identify and protect the axillary nerve rather than relying on a fixed measurement.
Verify on PubMed (PMID 35462535)
Evidence

Surgical Approaches to the Elbow in Fixation of Traumatic Injuries

Level V (Narrative review)
Hausman MR, Kator JL, Kim JM • Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (2025)
Key Findings:
  • Laterally the radial head and capitellum are accessed through the classic Kocher or variations of the Kaplan technique; posteriorly the distal humerus is exposed by triceps split, reflection or olecranon osteotomy.
  • The medial approach exposes the coronoid through or around flexor carpi ulnaris while protecting the ulnar nerve; more extensile lateral collateral ligament release gives near-total articular visualisation.
  • With increasing fracture complexity posterior approaches are favoured because they access both columns of the distal humerus, and arthroscopic-assisted fixation is an emerging adjunct.
Clinical implication: Elbow exposure should be described by target, interval, nerve protection and closure strategy rather than by incision name alone.
Verify on PubMed (PMID 41202198)
Evidence

Olecranon osteotomy for intra-articular distal humerus fractures (6-year series)

Level IV (Retrospective case series)
Coles CP, Barei DP, Nork SE, Taitsman LA, Hanel DP, Henley MB • Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma (2006)
Key Findings:
  • Among 114 AO/OTA 13-C fractures, 70 (61%) were managed with an intra-articular chevron olecranon osteotomy; the proportion rose with fracture complexity.
  • All osteotomies with adequate follow-up united (one delayed union), and every osteotomy-exposure patient achieved satisfactory radiographic articular reduction.
  • Hardware was the dominant downside: about 8% had isolated symptomatic osteotomy-fixation removal and 29.5% had proximal ulna implants removed overall.
Clinical implication: Olecranon osteotomy reliably delivers articular visualisation and union when fixed securely, but counsel patients about a high rate of symptomatic hardware removal; reserve it for complex articular fractures.
Verify on PubMed (PMID 16648697)
Evidence

Posterior interosseous nerve safe zone for proximal radius approaches

Level V (Cadaveric anatomical study)
Hohenberger GM, Schwarz AM, Maier MJ, Grechenig P, Dauwe J, et al. • Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy (2018)
Key Findings:
  • In 50 cadaveric limbs the PIN exited the supinator a mean of 60-63 mm distal to the radial head tip, with the nerve lying closer to the radial head in supination than pronation (p less than 0.001).
  • The PIN appeared across an interval of roughly 45-94 mm from the radial head depending on approach and rotation.
  • Pronation moves the nerve away from the operative field and should be maintained during distal extension of lateral and posterior approaches to the proximal radius.
Clinical implication: Keep dissection within about 4 cm of the radial head and pronate the forearm during distal lateral elbow exposure to protect the PIN.
Verify on PubMed (PMID 29619502)
Evidence

In situ placement versus anterior transposition of the ulnar nerve in distal humerus fractures (RCT)

Level I (Multicentre randomised controlled trial)
Dehghan N, Nauth A, Hall J, Vicente M, McKee MD, Schemitsch EH • Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma (2021)
Key Findings:
  • 58 patients with bicolumnar distal humerus fractures were randomised to in situ replacement of the mobilised ulnar nerve versus anterior subcutaneous transposition after plate fixation.
  • No significant difference in Gabel & Amadio ulnar neuropathy score, Mayo Elbow Performance Score, DASH or two-point discrimination at any time point.
  • Ulnar nerve function was poor early in both groups but improved significantly by 12 months.
Clinical implication: Either in situ placement or anterior transposition of the ulnar nerve is acceptable after bicolumnar fixation; the decision can be left to surgeon preference, and early ulnar symptoms often recover.
Verify on PubMed (PMID 33675624)

Useful source anchors:

  • Surgical exposures of the shoulder: PubMed 26918414
  • Surgical exposures of the humerus: PubMed 17148623
  • Surgical approaches to the elbow in fixation of traumatic injuries: PubMed 41202198
  • Subscapularis tenotomy versus lesser tuberosity osteotomy RCT: PubMed 30771825
  • Acromion-axillary nerve distance safe zone: PubMed 35462535
  • PIN safe zone for proximal radius approaches: PubMed 29619502
  • Olecranon osteotomy six-year series: PubMed 16648697
  • Ulnar nerve in situ versus transposition RCT: PubMed 33675624
  • PROFHER proximal humerus fracture trial: PubMed 25756440

Clinical Scenarios

Practise clinical reasoning and management decisions out loud

Viva scenarioStandard
Scenario 1: Deltopectoral approach for shoulder arthroplasty
Clinical prompt

“You are asked to describe a deltopectoral approach for shoulder arthroplasty.”

Viva scenarioChallenging
Scenario 2: Radial head fracture through a lateral elbow approach
Clinical prompt

“A patient has a displaced radial head fracture requiring fixation or replacement. Describe the lateral elbow exposure and the structures at risk.”

Viva scenarioAdvanced
Scenario 3: Complex distal humerus fracture
Clinical prompt

“CT shows a comminuted intra-articular distal humerus fracture requiring bicolumnar fixation. How do you choose the posterior exposure?”

Guidelines, Registries & Global Practice


There is no single international guideline that prescribes a specific shoulder or elbow approach; exposure choice is a surgeon-led decision governed by anatomy, pathology and the registry-level evidence on the underlying operation. The unifying principles are universal: document preoperative nerve status, position safely, choose exposure from imaging, protect named structures and plan early rehabilitation.

Global epidemiology and burden

Proximal humerus fractures are among the most common fragility fractures, typically third behind hip and distal radius fractures in older adults, and most are managed without an open approach at all. Distal humerus fractures show a bimodal distribution (high-energy young men, low-energy elderly women) and are rising with population ageing. This epidemiology drives the global debate over when an operative exposure is even warranted, which is the backdrop to approach selection.

Side-by-side guidance and registry evidence

PROFHER trial (UK, Rangan et al. 2015, PMID 25756440)
Domain
Displaced proximal humerus fracture
Signal
No benefit of surgery over non-operative care for most displaced fractures; fewer patients need an open shoulder approach than historically performed
Evidence level
Level I RCT
AAOS / shoulder & elbow literature
Domain
Subscapularis management in TSA
Signal
Tenotomy and lesser tuberosity osteotomy give equivalent function; LTO heals more reliably (Levine RCT, PMID 30771825)
Evidence level
Level I RCT
BOA / BOAST (UK) open fracture and trauma standards
Domain
Open injuries and trauma pathways
Signal
Emphasise early senior decision-making, soft-tissue assessment and orthoplastic input before definitive exposure
Evidence level
Guideline / consensus
AO Foundation principles
Domain
Distal humerus and elbow trauma
Signal
Posterior approaches with a deliberate triceps strategy give bicolumnar access; preserve and protect the ulnar nerve
Evidence level
Expert consensus / technique
NICE (UK) non-complex fracture guidance (NG38)
Domain
Fracture care pathways
Signal
Focus on shared decision-making, imaging and rehabilitation rather than mandating a specific exposure
Evidence level
Guideline
National arthroplasty registries (AOANJRR, NJR, Nordic)
Domain
Shoulder arthroplasty
Signal
Track implant survival and revision; the deltopectoral exposure underpins most anatomic and reverse arthroplasty volume
Evidence level
Registry observational
Guideline, Trial and Registry Signals Relevant to Approach Selection
Body / sourceDomainSignalEvidence level
PROFHER trial (UK, Rangan et al. 2015, PMID 25756440)Displaced proximal humerus fractureNo benefit of surgery over non-operative care for most displaced fractures; fewer patients need an open shoulder approach than historically performedLevel I RCT
AAOS / shoulder & elbow literatureSubscapularis management in TSATenotomy and lesser tuberosity osteotomy give equivalent function; LTO heals more reliably (Levine RCT, PMID 30771825)Level I RCT
BOA / BOAST (UK) open fracture and trauma standardsOpen injuries and trauma pathwaysEmphasise early senior decision-making, soft-tissue assessment and orthoplastic input before definitive exposureGuideline / consensus
AO Foundation principlesDistal humerus and elbow traumaPosterior approaches with a deliberate triceps strategy give bicolumnar access; preserve and protect the ulnar nerveExpert consensus / technique
NICE (UK) non-complex fracture guidance (NG38)Fracture care pathwaysFocus on shared decision-making, imaging and rehabilitation rather than mandating a specific exposureGuideline
National arthroplasty registries (AOANJRR, NJR, Nordic)Shoulder arthroplastyTrack implant survival and revision; the deltopectoral exposure underpins most anatomic and reverse arthroplasty volumeRegistry observational

Practice variation

  • When to expose at all: PROFHER and related trials shifted many displaced proximal humerus fractures towards non-operative care, reducing deltopectoral exposures in elderly patients while reverse shoulder arthroplasty (deltopectoral) has grown for selected complex patterns.
  • Subscapularis strategy: practice varies between tenotomy, peel and lesser tuberosity osteotomy; the evidence supports any well-executed and well-repaired technique.
  • Triceps and ulnar nerve handling in the elbow: olecranon osteotomy versus triceps-sparing exposures, and in situ versus transposed ulnar nerve, remain surgeon-preference decisions supported by Level I and IV evidence rather than mandated by guideline.
  • System factors: implant availability, trauma network maturity, orthoplastic support and rehabilitation access drive much of the international variation in exposure and timing.

Local practice reminders

  • Document neurological findings clearly before shoulder and elbow trauma surgery.
  • Discuss complex elbow trauma early with surgeons experienced in elbow reconstruction when available.
  • Plan rehabilitation access before procedures that need early supervised motion.
  • In arthroplasty, use the approach and implant system that the treating team can perform reliably and revise safely.
Exam day cheat sheet
Shoulder and Elbow Approach Summary

Approach Answer

  • Position, imaging and landmarks.
  • Interval or muscle strategy.
  • Danger structures.
  • Exposure target.
  • Repair and rehabilitation.

Shoulder

  • Deltopectoral: deltoid and pectoralis major interval.
  • Protect cephalic vein, musculocutaneous nerve and axillary nerve.
  • Subscapularis repair matters.
  • Deltoid split is limited by axillary nerve safety.

Elbow

  • Kocher: anconeus and ECU.
  • Kaplan: ECRB and EDC.
  • Medial approach: ulnar nerve and MABCN.
  • Posterior approach: choose triceps strategy.

Do Not Miss

  • Baseline nerve function.
  • PIN in lateral elbow exposure.
  • LUCL repair if released.
  • Ulnar nerve in posterior or medial elbow surgery.
  • Early safe motion after elbow surgery.

“Shoulder and elbow approaches should be described as functional exposures: choose the target, use the correct interval, protect the named nerves, repair stabilisers and plan rehabilitation.”

References

  1. 1
    Chalmers PN, Van Thiel GS, Trenhaile SW. "Surgical Exposures of the Shoulder". Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. 2016PubMed
  2. 2
    Zlotolow DA, Catalano LW 3rd, Barron OA, Glickel SZ. "Surgical exposures of the humerus". Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. 2006PubMed
  3. 3
    Hausman MR, Kator JL, Kim JM. "Surgical Approaches to the Elbow in Fixation of Traumatic Injuries". Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. 2025PubMed
  4. 4
    Levine WN, Munoz J, Hsu S, Byram IR, Bigliani LU, Ahmad CS, et al.. "Subscapularis tenotomy versus lesser tuberosity osteotomy during total shoulder arthroplasty for primary osteoarthritis: a prospective, randomized controlled trial". Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2019PubMed
  5. 5
    Yildirim C, Demirel M, Bayram E, Ekinci M, Yilmaz M. "Acromion-axillary nerve distance and its relation to the arm length in the prediction of the axillary nerve position: a clinical study". Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research. 2022PubMed
  6. 6
    Hohenberger GM, Schwarz AM, Maier MJ, Grechenig P, Dauwe J, et al.. "Safe zone for the posterior interosseous nerve with regard to the lateral and posterior approaches to the proximal radius". Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy. 2018PubMed
  7. 7
    Coles CP, Barei DP, Nork SE, Taitsman LA, Hanel DP, Henley MB. "The olecranon osteotomy: a six-year experience in the treatment of intraarticular fractures of the distal humerus". Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma. 2006PubMed
  8. 8
    Dehghan N, Nauth A, Hall J, Vicente M, McKee MD, Schemitsch EH. "In Situ Placement Versus Anterior Transposition of the Ulnar Nerve for Distal Humerus Fractures Treated With Plate Fixation: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial". Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma. 2021PubMed
  9. 9
    Rangan A, Handoll H, Brealey S, Jefferson L, Keding A, Corbacho B, et al.. "Surgical vs nonsurgical treatment of adults with displaced fractures of the proximal humerus: the PROFHER randomized clinical trial". JAMA. 2015PubMed
Editorially reviewed — transparent references and correction processPublished by OrthoVellum Medical Education TeamEditorial boardMethodologyReview policy
Educational disclosure

Educational content is reviewed for source visibility, editorial coherence, and correction readiness.

No individual clinician credential is claimed unless a named person is shown.

Verify before clinical use; this is not medical advice or a substitute for local guidance.

Procedure console
15 min
Read
0
Sections
advanced
Level
Peer-reviewed · 2026-06-01
Procedure info
Level
advanced
Updated
2026-06-01
Browse all procedures