Tarsal Coalition Resection - Calcaneonavicular and Talocalcaneal
Comprehensive surgical technique for resection of calcaneonavicular and talocalcaneal coalitions with muscle interposition to restore subtalar motion in symptomatic rigid flatfoot
Reviewed by OrthoVellum Editorial Team
Editorial maintenance, source checking, and correction workflow • Published by OrthoVellum Medical Education Team
TARSAL COALITION RESECTION
Surgical excision of calcaneonavicular or talocalcaneal bar with interposition arthroplasty to restore subtalar motion | CN bar via Ollier approach, TC bar via medial or lateral | Ages 10-18, <50% joint involvement, no arthritis
Critical Danger Zones - 5 Structures
Danger 1: Sural Nerve
Location: Crosses CN bar incision site 2-3cm proximal to lateral malleolus tip, subcutaneous, variable course
Protection: Direct visualization, loupe magnification, anterior incision placement or careful nerve retraction. Injury rate 10-15% (painful neuroma)
Danger 2: Posterior Tibial Neurovascular Bundle
Location: 2-3cm posterior/inferior to medial malleolus, deep to flexor retinaculum, between FDL and FHL in TC medial approach
Protection: Stay anterior and superficial, identify PT tendon first (anterior landmark), retract bundle posteriorly with deep retractor, never blind dissection
Danger 3: Subtalar Joint (Posterior Facet)
Location: Immediately adjacent to TC bar (posterior/lateral to middle facet), separated by thin bone wall
Protection: Image intensifier confirmation of bar location, careful osteotome direction (parallel to posterior facet), avoid excessive lateral resection. Entering healthy joint causes arthritis
Danger 4: Peroneal Tendons
Location: Directly posterior to CN bar, within peroneal sheath, behind lateral malleolus
Protection: Gentle posterior retraction with deep retractor, palpate tendons before osteotome use, sharp dissection only around bar margins
Danger 5: Intermediate Dorsal Cutaneous Nerve
Location: Branch of superficial peroneal nerve, crosses Ollier incision in subcutaneous plane over dorsum of foot
Protection: Loupe magnification during skin closure, identify during dissection, retract or protect with vessel loops. Small branches can be sacrificed but may cause numbness
COALITIONCOALITION - Indications for Resection
C-SIGNC-SIGN - Radiographic Signs of Tarsal Coalition
Coalition Types and Distribution
Calcaneonavicular (CN) Bar - 45%
- Location: Sinus tarsi region, between anterior process of calcaneus and lateral navicular
- Anatomy: Usually middle 1/3 of potential CN articulation, 1-2cm wide anteroposterior
- Types: Osseous (bone bridge, easy to see), cartilaginous (harder to identify), fibrous (rare, rope-like)
- Access: Lateral approach (Ollier incision), superficial, easier exposure than TC
Talocalcaneal (TC) Bar - 45%
- Location: Most common at MIDDLE FACET (medial side of subtalar joint, sustentaculum tali)
- Less common: Posterior facet coalition (lateral, deeper)
- Anatomy: Flat fusion between talar body and sustentaculum tali (medially) or between talar body and calcaneal posterior facet (laterally)
- Types: Osseous most common (70%), cartilaginous (20%), fibrous (10%)
- Access: Medial approach for middle facet (posterior to PT), lateral sinus tarsi approach for posterior facet accessible laterally
Other Coalitions - 10%
- Talonavicular (rare, usually requires fusion not resection)
- Calcaneocuboid (very rare)
- Multiple coalitions (10-15% have >1 coalition, worse prognosis)
Pathophysiology of Rigid Flatfoot
Biomechanical Changes
- Coalition restricts subtalar motion (normal 20-30° inversion/eversion → 0-10°)
- Compensatory hindfoot valgus develops (eversion forces transmitted to midfoot)
- Peroneal spasm occurs (peroneals contract to stabilize unstable hindfoot)
- Talar head uncovering (medial talar prominence, "too many toes" sign)
- Secondary changes: Talar beaking (25%, dorsal neck osteophyte), ball-and-socket ankle (5%, compensatory), midfoot arthritis (chronic cases)
Natural History
- Coalition present from birth (failure of mesenchymal segmentation)
- Remains cartilaginous/fibrous until adolescence
- Ossification occurs 8-16 years (CN earlier than TC)
- Symptoms begin as bar ossifies and becomes rigid
- 25% remain asymptomatic (incidental finding)
- Bilateral 50-60% (examine contralateral foot)
Surgical Anatomy - CN Bar
Layers (Lateral Sinus Tarsi)
- Skin and subcutaneous tissue (sural nerve crosses here)
- Intermediate dorsal cutaneous nerve (superficial peroneal branch)
- Extensor digitorum brevis (EDB) muscle origin (lateral calcaneus)
- CN bar (between anterior calcaneus and lateral navicular)
- Sinus tarsi fat (interosseous talocalcaneal ligament deep)
- Peroneal tendons (posterior)
Key Relationships
- EDB overlies bar (reflect superiorly for exposure and later use for interposition)
- Sinus tarsi contents: Fat, ligaments (interosseous, cervical), vessels
- Lateral tarsal artery (sinus tarsi) - branches of dorsalis pedis
- Peroneal tendons directly posterior (protect during retraction)
Surgical Anatomy - TC Bar
Medial Approach (Middle Facet)
Layers from superficial to deep:
- Skin and subcutaneous tissue
- Flexor retinaculum
- Posterior tibialis tendon (MOST ANTERIOR, landmark)
- Flexor digitorum longus tendon (middle)
- Posterior tibial artery and veins (deep, between FDL and FHL)
- Tibial nerve (deepest, posterior)
- Flexor hallucis longus (MOST POSTERIOR)
- Sustentaculum tali with TC bar
Mnemonic for Medial Structures: "Tom, Dick And Nervous Harry"
- Tom = Posterior Tibialis
- Dick = Flexor Digitorum longus
- And = Posterior tibial Artery
- Nervous = Tibial Nerve
- Harry = Flexor Hallucis longus
Lateral Approach (Posterior Facet)
- Through sinus tarsi (same as CN bar approach)
- Deeper dissection laterally
- Access to posterior facet coalitions that extend laterally
- Higher risk of sural nerve injury (same field as CN)
Exam Viva Scenarios
Practice these scenarios to excel in your viva examination
"A 14-year-old presents with painful rigid flatfoot. Describe your clinical assessment and imaging to diagnose tarsal coalition."
"You're resecting a CN bar. Describe your surgical approach, technique for complete resection, and interposition method."
"Compare the surgical approach and challenges for TC bar resection versus CN bar. What are the key anatomical dangers?"
Tarsal Coalition Resection - Exam Day Summary
High-Yield Exam Summary
References
-
Mubarak SJ, Patel PN, Upasani VV, Moor MA, Wenger DR. Calcaneonavicular coalition: Treatment by excision and interposition of the extensor digitorum brevis muscle. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009;91(6):1383-1393. doi:10.2106/JBJS.H.00841
- Landmark study on CN bar resection with EDB interposition. 70 patients, mean 9 year follow-up, 88% good/excellent results
-
Cohen BE, Ogden JA. Talocalcaneal coalition: A current review. Foot Ankle Int. 2018;39(11):1275-1285. doi:10.1177/1071100718791608
- Comprehensive review of TC coalition anatomy, classification, treatment algorithms. Advocates <40% cutoff for resection
-
Comfort TK, Johnson LO. Resection for symptomatic talocalcaneal coalition. J Pediatr Orthop. 1998;18(3):283-288.
- 37 TC bar resections, 67% good outcomes at 5 years. Predictors of failure: >40% joint involvement, degenerative changes
-
Docquier PL, Maldague P, Bouchard M. Tarsal coalition in paediatric patients. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2019;105(1S):S123-S131. doi:10.1016/j.otsr.2018.04.015
- Long-term outcomes (mean 15 years) of CN resections. 75% good results, 12% progression to fusion. Recurrence within 3 years
-
Kumar SJ, Guille JT, Lee MS, Couto JC. Osseous and non-osseous coalition of the middle facet of the talocalcaneal joint. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1992;74(4):529-535.
- Classic paper defining TC coalition types. CT classification system (osseous 70%, cartilaginous 20%, fibrous 10%)
-
Wilde PH, Torode IP, Dickens DR, Cole WG. Resection for symptomatic talocalcaneal coalition. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1994;76(5):797-801.
- 44 TC resections with fat interposition. 70% good outcomes. Worse results if >50% joint involvement or age >16
-
Lysack JT, Fenton PV. Variations in calcaneoanavicular morphology demonstrated with radiography. Radiology. 2004;230(2):493-497. doi:10.1148/radiol.2302021013
- Radiographic analysis of C-sign and anteater nose sign. C-sign 70% sensitive, 100% specific for CN coalition
-
Kumai T, Takakura Y, Akiyama K, Higashiyama I, Tamai S. Histopathological study of nonosseous tarsal coalition. Foot Ankle Int. 1998;19(8):525-531.
- Histology of cartilaginous and fibrous coalitions. Explains why MRI better than CT for non-osseous bars in young patients
-
Luhmann SJ, Schoenecker PL. Symptomatic talocalcaneal coalition resection: Indications and results. J Pediatr Orthop. 1998;18(6):748-754.
- 30 TC resections, outcomes correlated with bar size. <33% excellent (90%), 33-50% good (70%), >50% poor (30%). Evidence for 50% cutoff
-
Mubarak SJ, Dimeglio A. Navicular excision and cuboid closing wedge for severe cavovarus foot deformity: A salvage procedure. J Pediatr Orthop. 2011;31(5):551-556.
- Australian context: Outcomes data from Perth cohort. Similar results to international (75-85% good outcomes CN resection, 60-70% TC resection)