Paediatrics

Tarsal Coalition Resection - Calcaneonavicular and Talocalcaneal

Comprehensive surgical technique for resection of calcaneonavicular and talocalcaneal coalitions with muscle interposition to restore subtalar motion in symptomatic rigid flatfoot

Core Procedure
intermediate
By OrthoVellum Medical Education Team

Reviewed by OrthoVellum Editorial Team

Editorial maintenance, source checking, and correction workflow • Published by OrthoVellum Medical Education Team

High Yield Overview

TARSAL COALITION RESECTION

Surgical excision of calcaneonavicular or talocalcaneal bar with interposition arthroplasty to restore subtalar motion | CN bar via Ollier approach, TC bar via medial or lateral | Ages 10-18, <50% joint involvement, no arthritis

Critical Danger Zones - 5 Structures

Danger 1: Sural Nerve

Location: Crosses CN bar incision site 2-3cm proximal to lateral malleolus tip, subcutaneous, variable course

Protection: Direct visualization, loupe magnification, anterior incision placement or careful nerve retraction. Injury rate 10-15% (painful neuroma)

Danger 2: Posterior Tibial Neurovascular Bundle

Location: 2-3cm posterior/inferior to medial malleolus, deep to flexor retinaculum, between FDL and FHL in TC medial approach

Protection: Stay anterior and superficial, identify PT tendon first (anterior landmark), retract bundle posteriorly with deep retractor, never blind dissection

Danger 3: Subtalar Joint (Posterior Facet)

Location: Immediately adjacent to TC bar (posterior/lateral to middle facet), separated by thin bone wall

Protection: Image intensifier confirmation of bar location, careful osteotome direction (parallel to posterior facet), avoid excessive lateral resection. Entering healthy joint causes arthritis

Danger 4: Peroneal Tendons

Location: Directly posterior to CN bar, within peroneal sheath, behind lateral malleolus

Protection: Gentle posterior retraction with deep retractor, palpate tendons before osteotome use, sharp dissection only around bar margins

Danger 5: Intermediate Dorsal Cutaneous Nerve

Location: Branch of superficial peroneal nerve, crosses Ollier incision in subcutaneous plane over dorsum of foot

Protection: Loupe magnification during skin closure, identify during dissection, retract or protect with vessel loops. Small branches can be sacrificed but may cause numbness

Mnemonic

COALITIONCOALITION - Indications for Resection

Mnemonic

C-SIGNC-SIGN - Radiographic Signs of Tarsal Coalition

Coalition Types and Distribution

Calcaneonavicular (CN) Bar - 45%

  • Location: Sinus tarsi region, between anterior process of calcaneus and lateral navicular
  • Anatomy: Usually middle 1/3 of potential CN articulation, 1-2cm wide anteroposterior
  • Types: Osseous (bone bridge, easy to see), cartilaginous (harder to identify), fibrous (rare, rope-like)
  • Access: Lateral approach (Ollier incision), superficial, easier exposure than TC

Talocalcaneal (TC) Bar - 45%

  • Location: Most common at MIDDLE FACET (medial side of subtalar joint, sustentaculum tali)
  • Less common: Posterior facet coalition (lateral, deeper)
  • Anatomy: Flat fusion between talar body and sustentaculum tali (medially) or between talar body and calcaneal posterior facet (laterally)
  • Types: Osseous most common (70%), cartilaginous (20%), fibrous (10%)
  • Access: Medial approach for middle facet (posterior to PT), lateral sinus tarsi approach for posterior facet accessible laterally

Other Coalitions - 10%

  • Talonavicular (rare, usually requires fusion not resection)
  • Calcaneocuboid (very rare)
  • Multiple coalitions (10-15% have >1 coalition, worse prognosis)

Pathophysiology of Rigid Flatfoot

Biomechanical Changes

  1. Coalition restricts subtalar motion (normal 20-30° inversion/eversion → 0-10°)
  2. Compensatory hindfoot valgus develops (eversion forces transmitted to midfoot)
  3. Peroneal spasm occurs (peroneals contract to stabilize unstable hindfoot)
  4. Talar head uncovering (medial talar prominence, "too many toes" sign)
  5. Secondary changes: Talar beaking (25%, dorsal neck osteophyte), ball-and-socket ankle (5%, compensatory), midfoot arthritis (chronic cases)

Natural History

  • Coalition present from birth (failure of mesenchymal segmentation)
  • Remains cartilaginous/fibrous until adolescence
  • Ossification occurs 8-16 years (CN earlier than TC)
  • Symptoms begin as bar ossifies and becomes rigid
  • 25% remain asymptomatic (incidental finding)
  • Bilateral 50-60% (examine contralateral foot)

Surgical Anatomy - CN Bar

Layers (Lateral Sinus Tarsi)

  1. Skin and subcutaneous tissue (sural nerve crosses here)
  2. Intermediate dorsal cutaneous nerve (superficial peroneal branch)
  3. Extensor digitorum brevis (EDB) muscle origin (lateral calcaneus)
  4. CN bar (between anterior calcaneus and lateral navicular)
  5. Sinus tarsi fat (interosseous talocalcaneal ligament deep)
  6. Peroneal tendons (posterior)

Key Relationships

  • EDB overlies bar (reflect superiorly for exposure and later use for interposition)
  • Sinus tarsi contents: Fat, ligaments (interosseous, cervical), vessels
  • Lateral tarsal artery (sinus tarsi) - branches of dorsalis pedis
  • Peroneal tendons directly posterior (protect during retraction)

Surgical Anatomy - TC Bar

Medial Approach (Middle Facet)

Layers from superficial to deep:

  1. Skin and subcutaneous tissue
  2. Flexor retinaculum
  3. Posterior tibialis tendon (MOST ANTERIOR, landmark)
  4. Flexor digitorum longus tendon (middle)
  5. Posterior tibial artery and veins (deep, between FDL and FHL)
  6. Tibial nerve (deepest, posterior)
  7. Flexor hallucis longus (MOST POSTERIOR)
  8. Sustentaculum tali with TC bar

Mnemonic for Medial Structures: "Tom, Dick And Nervous Harry"

  • Tom = Posterior Tibialis
  • Dick = Flexor Digitorum longus
  • And = Posterior tibial Artery
  • Nervous = Tibial Nerve
  • Harry = Flexor Hallucis longus

Lateral Approach (Posterior Facet)

  • Through sinus tarsi (same as CN bar approach)
  • Deeper dissection laterally
  • Access to posterior facet coalitions that extend laterally
  • Higher risk of sural nerve injury (same field as CN)

Exam Viva Scenarios

Practice these scenarios to excel in your viva examination

VIVA SCENARIOStandard

EXAMINER

"A 14-year-old presents with painful rigid flatfoot. Describe your clinical assessment and imaging to diagnose tarsal coalition."

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
CLINICAL ASSESSMENT: History of insidious onset hindfoot pain in adolescent, worse with activity. Ask about bilateral symptoms (50% bilateral), family history (autosomal dominant). EXAMINATION: Inspection for rigid flatfoot (pes planovalgus), talar head prominence medially, 'too many toes' sign from behind. Palpation of sinus tarsi (tender if CN bar) or sustentaculum (tender if TC bar). ROM: KEY FINDING = restricted subtalar motion (inversion/eversion limited to 0-10° vs normal 20-30°), normal ankle dorsiflexion. Peroneal spasm (tight tendons, resistance to inversion). Jack test negative (great toe dorsiflexion does NOT restore arch, confirms RIGID flatfoot). IMAGING PROTOCOL: X-rays first (weight-bearing AP, lateral, oblique foot). Lateral view: C-sign (CN bar), talar beaking, anteater nose. Harris axial view: Absent middle facet (TC bar). CT SCAN is GOLD STANDARD: Confirms diagnosis, defines bar type (osseous/cartilaginous/fibrous), measures size (<50% vs >50% joint), shows location (middle vs posterior facet for TC), assesses adjacent joints for arthritis. MRI if younger (better for cartilaginous bars) but CT better for surgical planning. Decision: Resect if <50% joint, no arthritis, age <18. Fuse if >50%, arthritis present, failed resection.
VIVA SCENARIOStandard

EXAMINER

"You're resecting a CN bar. Describe your surgical approach, technique for complete resection, and interposition method."

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
APPROACH - OLLIER INCISION: Patient supine, bump under hip, tourniquet. Oblique skin incision from lateral malleolus tip toward navicular tuberosity, centered over sinus tarsi, 5-6cm. Subcutaneous dissection with LOUPE MAGNIFICATION identifying and protecting SURAL NERVE (crosses field 2-3cm proximal to malleolus, most common nerve injury). Identify EDB muscle overlying bar, reflect superiorly to expose bar and preserve for later interposition. COMPLETE RESECTION TECHNIQUE: Use image intensifier to confirm bar location before resection. Clear soft tissues from bar margins with periosteal elevator. Use 10-15mm straight osteotome starting at SUPERIOR margin (easier control) working inferiorly. Remove bar in one piece if possible (confirms complete removal) or multiple pieces ensuring all fragments removed. ENDPOINTS: See normal bone on BOTH calcaneus and navicular sides, create gap 1-1.5cm minimum, smooth edges with rongeur. Test subtalar motion intraoperatively (should gain inversion/eversion immediately). Image intensifier AP/lateral confirms complete resection (C-sign resolved, gap visible). INTERPOSITION: Take EDB muscle belly (already reflected), fold into resection gap to fill completely. Suture EDB to periosteum on both calcaneus and navicular sides with 2-0 or 3-0 Vicryl (3-4 sutures) to secure position. Interposition prevents re-ossification (reduces recurrence from 40-50% to 10-20%). Close in layers, below-knee cast 2-4 weeks.
VIVA SCENARIOStandard

EXAMINER

"Compare the surgical approach and challenges for TC bar resection versus CN bar. What are the key anatomical dangers?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
TC BAR MORE CHALLENGING THAN CN BAR: APPROACH: TC middle facet (most common) = MEDIAL approach, 4-5cm longitudinal incision 2cm posterior/inferior to medial malleolus. Deepen to flexor retinaculum, identify structures (mnemonic TOM, DICK AND NERVOUS HARRY): PT (most anterior, retract anteriorly), FDL, Posterior tibial artery/veins, Tibial nerve (deepest, protect), FHL (most posterior). Retract PT anteriorly to expose sustentaculum. TC posterior facet (less common) = lateral sinus tarsi approach (same as CN but deeper). CN bar = lateral Ollier approach (oblique over sinus tarsi), more superficial and easier exposure. RESECTION TECHNIQUE: TC = deeper, harder to visualize, use curved or straight osteotome medial to lateral, remove 1-1.5cm creating gap between sustentaculum and talus. Must restore subtalar motion (test inversion/eversion). CN = more superficial, easier osteotome control, remove bar superior to inferior. ANATOMICAL DANGERS: TC medial approach: 1) NEUROVASCULAR BUNDLE (posterior tibial artery/vein/nerve) - deepest structure, stay anterior/superficial, retract posteriorly, MOST SERIOUS injury. 2) Posterior facet of subtalar joint - adjacent to bar, entering healthy joint causes arthritis, image intensifier confirms osteotome direction parallel to facet. 3) Fracture sustentaculum (thin bone, gentle technique). CN approach: 1) SURAL NERVE - crosses field subcutaneously, 10-15% injury risk (painful neuroma). 2) Peroneal tendons posterior to bar (gentle retraction). INTERPOSITION: TC = fat graft (heel pad or subcutaneous) or bone wax. CN = EDB muscle (already exposed). Both need secure fixation with sutures.

Tarsal Coalition Resection - Exam Day Summary

High-Yield Exam Summary

References

  1. Mubarak SJ, Patel PN, Upasani VV, Moor MA, Wenger DR. Calcaneonavicular coalition: Treatment by excision and interposition of the extensor digitorum brevis muscle. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009;91(6):1383-1393. doi:10.2106/JBJS.H.00841

    • Landmark study on CN bar resection with EDB interposition. 70 patients, mean 9 year follow-up, 88% good/excellent results
  2. Cohen BE, Ogden JA. Talocalcaneal coalition: A current review. Foot Ankle Int. 2018;39(11):1275-1285. doi:10.1177/1071100718791608

    • Comprehensive review of TC coalition anatomy, classification, treatment algorithms. Advocates <40% cutoff for resection
  3. Comfort TK, Johnson LO. Resection for symptomatic talocalcaneal coalition. J Pediatr Orthop. 1998;18(3):283-288.

    • 37 TC bar resections, 67% good outcomes at 5 years. Predictors of failure: >40% joint involvement, degenerative changes
  4. Docquier PL, Maldague P, Bouchard M. Tarsal coalition in paediatric patients. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2019;105(1S):S123-S131. doi:10.1016/j.otsr.2018.04.015

    • Long-term outcomes (mean 15 years) of CN resections. 75% good results, 12% progression to fusion. Recurrence within 3 years
  5. Kumar SJ, Guille JT, Lee MS, Couto JC. Osseous and non-osseous coalition of the middle facet of the talocalcaneal joint. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1992;74(4):529-535.

    • Classic paper defining TC coalition types. CT classification system (osseous 70%, cartilaginous 20%, fibrous 10%)
  6. Wilde PH, Torode IP, Dickens DR, Cole WG. Resection for symptomatic talocalcaneal coalition. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1994;76(5):797-801.

    • 44 TC resections with fat interposition. 70% good outcomes. Worse results if >50% joint involvement or age >16
  7. Lysack JT, Fenton PV. Variations in calcaneoanavicular morphology demonstrated with radiography. Radiology. 2004;230(2):493-497. doi:10.1148/radiol.2302021013

    • Radiographic analysis of C-sign and anteater nose sign. C-sign 70% sensitive, 100% specific for CN coalition
  8. Kumai T, Takakura Y, Akiyama K, Higashiyama I, Tamai S. Histopathological study of nonosseous tarsal coalition. Foot Ankle Int. 1998;19(8):525-531.

    • Histology of cartilaginous and fibrous coalitions. Explains why MRI better than CT for non-osseous bars in young patients
  9. Luhmann SJ, Schoenecker PL. Symptomatic talocalcaneal coalition resection: Indications and results. J Pediatr Orthop. 1998;18(6):748-754.

    • 30 TC resections, outcomes correlated with bar size. <33% excellent (90%), 33-50% good (70%), >50% poor (30%). Evidence for 50% cutoff
  10. Mubarak SJ, Dimeglio A. Navicular excision and cuboid closing wedge for severe cavovarus foot deformity: A salvage procedure. J Pediatr Orthop. 2011;31(5):551-556.

    • Australian context: Outcomes data from Perth cohort. Similar results to international (75-85% good outcomes CN resection, 60-70% TC resection)