Skip to main content
OrthoVellumOrthopaedic Exam Prep
Pricing
About OrthoVellum
OrthoVellum
A living orthopaedic atlas

Exam-focused orthopaedic references, a question bank, viva practice, and spaced-repetition revision β€” with every clinical claim traceable to its source. Content is educational only and is not a substitute for local supervision, clinical judgement, or institutional policy.


Library

  • Clinical Topics
  • Blog
  • Site Updates
  • Content Methodology

Company

  • About Us
  • Authors & Disclosure
  • Editorial Team
  • Editorial Policy
  • Advertising Policy

Legal

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Medical Disclaimer
  • Copyright & DMCA

Support

  • Support OrthoVellum
  • Help Center
  • Contact
  • Accessibility
Evidence. Clarity. Practice.

Β© 2026 OrthoVellum. For educational purposes only.

Not medical advice. Verify clinically important information against current local guidance.

Tarsal Coalition Resection - Calcaneonavicular and Talocalcaneal

Operative SurgeryPaediatrics
PaediatricsIntermediateCore Procedure

Tarsal Coalition Resection - Calcaneonavicular and Talocalcaneal

Comprehensive surgical technique for resection of calcaneonavicular and talocalcaneal coalitions with muscle interposition to restore subtalar motion in symptomatic rigid flatfoot

Procedure console
18 minutes
Read
0
Sections
intermediate
Level
Peer-reviewed Β· 2026-06-20
High-yield overview

Surgical excision of a calcaneonavicular or talocalcaneal bar with interposition arthroplasty to restore subtalar motion. CN bar via the Ollier (sinus tarsi) approach, TC bar via a medial approach. Resect when the bar is small relative to the facet, there is no adjacent arthritis, and the patient is young.

PediatricSubspecialty
90%CN + TC coalitions
60-90%Good results
10-20%Recurrence rate
Critical Must-Knows
  • A tarsal coalition is an abnormal cartilaginous, fibrous or osseous bridge between tarsal bones that causes a rigid flatfoot with peroneal spasm. The key exam finding is restricted subtalar motion with normal ankle motion.
  • Calcaneonavicular (CN) bar is the most common: look for the anteater-nose sign, best profiled on the 45-degree oblique foot view. Resect it through the Ollier (sinus tarsi) approach and interpose EDB muscle or a fat graft to prevent recurrence.
  • Talocalcaneal (TC) middle-facet bar is the next most common: look for the C-sign and an absent or dysmorphic middle facet on the standing lateral and Harris views. Resect it through a medial approach and interpose a fat graft or bone wax.
  • Resection success depends on a bar that is small relative to the facet, no adjacent-joint arthritis, complete bar removal, and adequate interposition. The historical 50-percent facet cutoff is a guide, not an absolute rule.
  • The condition is bilateral in 50 to 60 percent of patients, so always examine and image the contralateral foot.

When & Why


Indication. A symptomatic tarsal coalition in a child or adolescent β€” typically aged 10 to 16 years β€” with hindfoot pain (sinus tarsi or medial arch) worse with activity and sport, a rigid flatfoot with restricted subtalar motion, and peroneal spasm, that has failed conservative treatment (activity modification, a University of California Biomechanics Laboratory-style orthotic with a medial arch support and heel cup, NSAIDs, and physical therapy). Symptoms usually begin only as the bar ossifies and becomes rigid; around 25 percent of coalitions remain asymptomatic and are incidental findings. Clinical assessment. Ask about bilateral symptoms and family history (autosomal dominant inheritance with incomplete penetrance). On examination look for: - A rigid pes planovalgus, medial talar-head prominence, and a "too many toes" sign viewed from behind.

  • Restricted subtalar motion (inversion and eversion limited to 0 to 10 degrees versus a normal 20 to 30 degrees) with normal ankle dorsiflexion and plantarflexion β€” the finding that separates coalition from ankle pathology.
  • Sinus tarsi tenderness (suggesting a CN bar) or sustentaculum tenderness (suggesting a TC bar).
  • A negative Jack test (dorsiflexing the great toe does not restore the arch, confirming rigidity).
  • Peroneal spasm: attempted inversion provokes peroneal contraction and pain. Document intact neurovascular status, including tibial nerve function. Peroneal "spastic" flatfoot is a misnomer β€” the peroneals are tight rather than in true spasm; they contract to stabilise an unstable valgus hindfoot. Imaging protocol. Weight-bearing plain radiographs come first (AP, lateral, 45-degree oblique foot, and a Harris axial view). The CT scan is the gold standard β€” it confirms the diagnosis, defines the bar type (osseous, cartilaginous or fibrous), measures the proportion of the facet involved, locates the bar (middle versus posterior facet for TC), and assesses the adjacent joints for arthritis. MRI is the best adjunct for cartilaginous or fibrous bars in younger patients and for marrow oedema, but its bone detail is inferior to CT for surgical planning.

Anteater nose
Best view
Lateral and 45-degree oblique
Suggests
Calcaneonavicular coalition
Sensitivity
Variable
Specificity
Variable
C-sign
Best view
Standing lateral
Suggests
Talocalcaneal coalition
Sensitivity
Around 56 percent
Specificity
Near 100 percent
Absent or dysmorphic middle facet
Best view
Standing lateral and Harris axial
Suggests
Talocalcaneal coalition
Sensitivity
Around 75 percent
Specificity
Around 98 percent
Talar beak
Best view
Standing lateral
Suggests
Non-specific altered biomechanics (not inoperability)
Sensitivity
Around 53 percent
Specificity
Around 90 percent
Radiographic signs of tarsal coalition
SignBest viewSuggestsSensitivitySpecificity
Anteater noseLateral and 45-degree obliqueCalcaneonavicular coalitionVariableVariable
C-signStanding lateralTalocalcaneal coalitionAround 56 percentNear 100 percent
Absent or dysmorphic middle facetStanding lateral and Harris axialTalocalcaneal coalitionAround 75 percentAround 98 percent
Talar beakStanding lateralNon-specific altered biomechanics (not inoperability)Around 53 percentAround 90 percent
A classic trap is to attribute the C-sign to a calcaneonavicular bar β€” it indicates a talocalcaneal coalition. Combining the absent-middle-facet sign with the C-sign raises sensitivity to around 84 percent with 98 percent specificity, but CT remains necessary to characterise the type and size before surgery. The one decision that matters: resect or fuse. Selection should weigh arthritis, deformity and symptoms rather than a single percentage:

Age and growth
Favors resection
Young, ideally skeletally immature
Favors fusion
Older with established arthritis
Bar size
Favors resection
Small relative to the posterior facet
Favors fusion
Large, involving most of the posterior facet
Bar type
Favors resection
Cartilaginous or fibrous
Favors fusion
Dense osseous (relative)
Adjacent joints
Favors resection
No degenerative change
Favors fusion
Arthritis in the subtalar, talonavicular or calcaneocuboid joint
Deformity
Favors resection
Hindfoot valgus that is correctable
Favors fusion
Severe fixed rigid flatfoot
Prior surgery
Favors resection
First-time resection
Favors fusion
Failed prior resection with recurrence
Coalition burden
Favors resection
Isolated single CN or TC bar
Favors fusion
Multiple coalitions or complex deformity
Resection versus fusion β€” selection factors
FactorFavors resectionFavors fusion
Age and growthYoung, ideally skeletally immatureOlder with established arthritis
Bar sizeSmall relative to the posterior facetLarge, involving most of the posterior facet
Bar typeCartilaginous or fibrousDense osseous (relative)
Adjacent jointsNo degenerative changeArthritis in the subtalar, talonavicular or calcaneocuboid joint
DeformityHindfoot valgus that is correctableSevere fixed rigid flatfoot
Prior surgeryFirst-time resectionFailed prior resection with recurrence
Coalition burdenIsolated single CN or TC barMultiple coalitions or complex deformity

The 50-percent guide is not absolute. The classic "less than 50 percent of the posterior facet" cutoff (Wilde, 1994) is a useful guide, but the 2023 systematic review (Polt) found coalition size was not a strong determinant of outcome β€” selection should weigh arthritis, heel valgus and symptoms rather than a single percentage, and there is increasing interest in resecting larger or recurrent bars in motivated young patients to preserve subtalar motion and defer arthrodesis. Surgical planning checklist. CT reviewed (bar type, size, location confirmed); adjacent joints assessed (no arthritis on CT); hindfoot alignment measured (plan an adjunctive osteotomy if severe valgus); bilateral assessment (check the contralateral foot); interposition material planned (EDB or fat for CN; fat or wax for TC); consent covers nerve injury, recurrence, the possible need for fusion and possible osteotomy; equipment ready (image intensifier, 10 to 15 mm osteotomes, retractors, loupe magnification). Consent specifically for sural or superficial-peroneal-branch numbness or a painful neuroma, recurrence (10 to 20 percent), persistent flatfoot needing a later osteotomy, the small chance of progression to fusion, wound problems and CRPS. Setup. For a CN bar the patient is supine with a bump under the ipsilateral hip to internally rotate the limb for lateral access, the knee flexed 30 to 45 degrees, and a thigh or calf tourniquet (250 to 300 mmHg). For a TC middle-facet bar the patient is supine for the medial approach (lateral decubitus if a lateral sinus-tarsi approach to a posterior-facet bar is planned). An image intensifier is essential throughout, and loupe magnification (2.5 to 3.5 times) is mandatory for nerve identification.

The Operation


The goal is to completely excise the bar, protect the adjacent nerves, vessels and the healthy subtalar joint, restore subtalar motion, and interpose tissue across the gap to prevent re-ossification. The exposure is laid out in full as the first steps of each timeline below. There are two distinct operations: the CN bar through a lateral (Ollier) approach, and the TC bar through a medial approach.

Tarsal coalition anatomy
Hindfoot anatomy: the calcaneonavicular and talocalcaneal junctions where a tarsal coalition is resected.Credit: OrthoVellum surgical illustration

CN bar resection β€” lateral (Ollier) approach

Step 1Position, landmarks & setup
  • Supine, bump under the ipsilateral hip, knee flexed 30 to 45 degrees, thigh or calf tourniquet, foot prepped free, loupes on.
  • Palpate the landmarks before inflating the tourniquet (blanched skin is harder to landmark): the lateral malleolus tip, the navicular tuberosity, and the sinus tarsi depression just anterior to the lateral malleolus.
Step 2Ollier (sinus tarsi) incision
  • An oblique skin incision from the lateral malleolus tip toward the navicular tuberosity, centred over the sinus tarsi, 5 to 6 cm long, gently curved along the skin creases.
  • The oblique orientation keeps it off the direct course of the sural nerve and allows extension proximally or distally if needed.
Step 3Protect the sural nerve (subcutaneous dissection)
  • Blunt dissection in the subcutaneous plane with spreaders; identify and protect the sural nerve (the structure most often injured) and the intermediate dorsal cutaneous nerve branches of the superficial peroneal nerve.
  • Use loupe magnification throughout this layer; retract the nerve posteriorly with a vessel loop, or place the incision anterior to its expected course if that can be done without compromising exposure.
Step 4Expose the bar β€” reflect EDB superiorly
  • The extensor digitorum brevis (EDB) muscle belly originates from the lateral calcaneus and overlies the CN bar. Reflect it superiorly off the calcaneus subperiosteally β€” this both exposes the bar and preserves the muscle for later interposition.
  • Use a periosteal elevator to clear soft tissue from the bar and define all of its margins (superior, inferior, anterior, posterior). Palpate the abnormal bony bridge between the anterior calcaneus and the navicular.
Step 5Confirm the bar with the image intensifier
  • Normal anatomy is a roughly 1 cm gap between the anterior calcaneus and the navicular; a coalition is bridging bone, cartilage or fibrous tissue.
  • Use AP, lateral and oblique image-intensifier views to confirm the bar location and the planned resection margins before any osteotome work.
Step 6Resect the bar (osteotome technique)
  • Begin with a 10 to 15 mm straight osteotome at the superior margin of the bar (easier to control) and work from superior to inferior in the coronal plane.
  • Remove the bar in one piece if possible (it confirms complete resection); if large, remove it in multiple pieces and ensure every fragment is cleared, including dorsal and plantar osteophytes.
  • Place a deep retractor posteriorly to protect the peroneal tendons, which lie directly posterior to the bar within their sheath.
  • Endpoints: normal bone visible on both the calcaneal and navicular sides, a gap of at least 1 to 1.5 cm, smooth edges (rongeur away sharp points), and improved subtalar motion on intra-operative testing.
  • Confirm complete resection on the image intensifier β€” a clear gap at the sinus tarsi on AP, lateral and oblique views.
Step 7Interpose EDB muscle or a fat graft
  • Take the EDB muscle belly (already reflected) and fold or roll it into the resection gap to fill it completely.
  • Suture the muscle to periosteum on both the calcaneal and navicular sides with 2-0 or 3-0 absorbable suture (Vicryl), using 3 to 4 sutures to secure it and prevent dislodgement.
  • If EDB is inadequate, use a fat graft from the sinus tarsi or local subcutaneous tissue, split abductor digiti minimi, or bone wax (see the interposition choice cards below).
Step 8Closure & immobilisation
  • Irrigate copiously, release the tourniquet and achieve haemostasis with bipolar cautery, then reapproximate any EDB not used for interposition.
  • Close the deep fascia with 2-0 or 3-0 absorbable, subcutaneous with 3-0 or 4-0 absorbable (buried), and skin with 4-0 nylon or a running subcuticular 4-0 absorbable.
  • Apply a sterile dressing, soft padding, and a below-knee cast or walking boot with the hindfoot in neutral and slight inversion.
Sural nerve β€” the most common complication

The sural nerve crosses the field 2 to 3 cm proximal to the lateral malleolus tip with a variable course, and injury (10 to 15 percent) causes lateral-foot and fifth-toe numbness or a painful neuroma that is worse than the numbness. Protect it with loupe magnification, blunt subcutaneous dissection, direct visualisation and gentle retraction. A similar principle applies to the intermediate dorsal cutaneous nerve crossing the dorsum of the foot.

Peroneal tendons β€” protect before the osteotome

The peroneal tendons lie directly posterior to the CN bar within their sheath. Palpate them, place a deep posterior retractor before any osteotome work, and retract gently β€” excessive force causes tendon injury or subluxation.

How do you know you have removed it all?

See normal bone on both the calcaneal and navicular sides, create a gap of at least 1 cm, smooth the edges with a rongeur, confirm restoration of subtalar motion on intra-operative testing, and check the image intensifier (AP, lateral and oblique) for a clear sinus tarsi with no residual bridge. Incomplete resection is the most common cause of recurrence.

TC bar resection β€” medial approach (middle facet)

Step 1Position, landmarks & setup
  • Supine for the medial approach, thigh or calf tourniquet, foot prepped free, loupes on, image intensifier draped in.
  • Palpate the landmarks: the medial malleolus, the sustentaculum tali (a bony shelf about 1 cm inferior to the malleolus), and the posterior tibialis tendon (palpable with the foot inverted).
Step 2Medial incision over the sustentaculum
  • A longitudinal incision 4 to 5 cm long, centred 2 cm posterior and inferior to the medial malleolus tip, paralleling the course of the posterior tibialis tendon.
  • Keep 2 cm posterior to avoid the saphenous vein and nerve (which lie anterior); the incision can extend proximally or distally for exposure.
Step 3Deep dissection β€” Tom, Dick And Nervous Harry
  • Identify and protect the saphenous vein and nerve if encountered, then deepen to the flexor retinaculum and incise it sharply through both layers.
  • Identify the deep structures from anterior to posterior using the mnemonic Tom, Dick And Nervous Harry: Tom = posterior Tibialis (most anterior, largest, flat); Dick = flexor Digitorum longus (middle, round); And = posterior tibial Artery and veins (pulsatile, deep); Nervous = tibial Nerve (deepest, posterior, large, yellow); Harry = flexor Hallucis longus (most posterior, deep in its tunnel).
  • Retract the posterior tibialis anteriorly and the FDL, neurovascular bundle and FHL posteriorly to expose the sustentaculum.
Step 4Identify the bar; confirm with image intensifier
  • Palpate the sustentaculum tali β€” normally separate from the talus with a middle-facet gap. A coalition is a flat bony or cartilaginous fusion between the sustentaculum (calcaneus) and the talar body medially, with no clear facet joint line, typically 1 to 2 cm wide.
  • Confirm the bar location on AP and lateral image-intensifier views (a Harris axial view if available shows the middle facet clearly).
Step 5Resect the bar, protecting the posterior facet
  • Use a straight or curved 10 to 15 mm osteotome, directing it medial to lateral and parallel to the posterior facet, removing 1 to 1.5 cm of bone to separate the sustentaculum from the talus and create a mobile middle-facet gap.
  • The posterior facet of the subtalar joint is immediately adjacent to the bar β€” entering this healthy joint causes arthritis, pain and failure, so keep the resection parallel to the facet plane and do not extend too far laterally.
  • Endpoints: the sustentaculum separate from the talus, normal bone contours on both sides, a gap of at least 1 cm, and restored subtalar motion on intra-operative testing. A headlight, deep retractors and frequent image-intensifier checks help because the exposure is deeper and harder to see than a CN bar.
Step 6Interpose a fat graft or bone wax
  • Fill the gap with a fat graft harvested from the heel pad or local subcutaneous tissue (1 to 2 cubic cm), or pack it with bone wax (simple but non-biological).
  • Suture the fat graft to surrounding tissues with 2-0 Vicryl so it fills the gap completely and stays in position.
Step 7Repair the retinaculum & close
  • Irrigate thoroughly, release the tourniquet and achieve haemostasis.
  • Repair the flexor retinaculum with 2-0 absorbable (it restores the pulley for posterior tibialis), then close subcutaneous and skin as for the CN bar.
  • Apply a below-knee cast or walking boot.
Posterior tibial neurovascular bundle β€” the deepest danger

The posterior tibial artery, veins and tibial nerve lie 2 to 3 cm posterior and inferior to the medial malleolus, deep to the flexor retinaculum between FDL and FHL β€” the deepest structure in the field. Stay anterior and superficial, identify the posterior tibialis tendon first as the anterior landmark, retract the bundle posteriorly with a deep retractor, and never dissect blind. Pulsatile bleeding means arterial injury: control it directly and repair primarily if more than half the circumference is transected. If the nerve is visualised, keep it moist to prevent desiccation injury.

Posterior facet β€” entering the healthy joint fails the operation

The posterior facet sits immediately posterior and lateral to the middle-facet bar, separated only by a thin wall of bone. Use the image intensifier to confirm the osteotome direction is parallel to the facet, and avoid excessive lateral resection. Entering the healthy posterior facet causes post-operative subtalar arthritis and a poor result.

CN bar β€” EDB muscle

Already exposed and well-vascularised, so convenient; but a cadaveric study (Mubarak) showed it fills only about 64 percent of the gap, leaving roughly 10 mm of the plantar gap unfilled.

CN bar β€” fat graft

Harvested from the sinus tarsi or local subcutaneous tissue; fills the gap completely and is the preferred choice for that reason (around 5 percent reossification in Mubarak's series).

TC bar β€” fat graft or bone wax

Fat graft from the heel pad or subcutaneous tissue fills the gap completely; bone wax is simple but non-biological. Whatever you use, suture or pack it securely so it cannot dislodge.

Why interpose at all?

Bare resection without interposition carries a high re-ossification and recurrence rate; interposing tissue across the gap markedly reduces it. EDB is convenient but a fat graft fills the gap completely (EDB fills only about 64 percent β€” Mubarak 2009). In every case the principle is the same: fill the gap completely and suture the interposed tissue in place so it cannot dislodge.

Adjunctive calcaneal osteotomy β€” when to add it

If the hindfoot corrects to neutral or varus after the coalition is resected, no osteotomy is needed. If it remains in valgus, add a medialising calcaneal osteotomy (Koutsogiannis) or a lateral-column lengthening (Evans), either concurrently or staged after 3 to 6 months. A persistent valgus is more common with TC bars (around 50 percent) than CN bars (around 10 percent).

Aftercare & Complications


Rehabilitation | Phase | Timing | Immobilisation | Therapy | |-------|--------|----------------|---------| | 1 | 0-2 weeks | Below-knee cast or walking boot (hindfoot neutral, slight inversion) | Elevation 48-72 hours; finger and toe range of motion only | | 2 | 2-6 weeks | Cast removed at 2-4 weeks; transition to walking boot or supportive shoe | Subtalar inversion and eversion, ankle motion, toe curls (start 2-4 weeks) | | 3 | 6-12 weeks | Boot for heavy tasks; custom orthotic (medial arch support, heel cup) | Peroneal and intrinsic strengthening; proprioception | | 4 | 3-4 months | Orthotic continues (often 6-12 months) | Jogging, sport-specific drills, graded return to sport | If a calcaneal osteotomy was added, the patient is non-weight-bearing for 6 weeks, then progresses to weight-bearing in a boot from weeks 6 to 10. Most patients return to light sport at 3 to 4 months once they are pain-free, have subtalar motion at 80 percent of the other side and strength at 85 percent, and pass a single-leg hop test at greater than 90 percent. Follow up at 2 weeks (wound check), 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months and 1 year with radiographs; monitor the contralateral foot, which may become symptomatic later. Outcomes (verified ranges). CN bar resection gives high rates of good or excellent results and return to sport with adequate interposition β€” around 87 percent return to sport and around 5 percent reoperation in Mubarak's fat-graft series. TC bar resection is historically a little lower and more dependent on facet involvement, heel valgus and adjacent arthritis (Comfort and Johnson around 77 percent good or excellent when the coalition involved one third or less of the joint; Luhmann mean AOFAS around 82). Pooled open resection with interposition gives improved patient-reported outcomes in around 78.8 percent with around 4.96 percent complications (Polt, 2023). Recurrence or re-ossification is low with complete resection plus adequate interposition, and rises with incomplete resection or no interposition. Complications

Recurrence or persistent symptoms (10-20%)
Recognition
Pain returns 6-24 months post-op; restricted subtalar motion; re-ossification or a residual bar on radiograph or CT
Prevention
Complete initial resection (normal bone both sides, 1 cm gap minimum) with adequate interposition and smoothed edges
Management
Conservative trial first; CT to size any recurrence; revision resection if small, fusion if large, arthritic or revision fails
Nerve injury (10-15%)
Recognition
Sural: lateral-foot or fifth-toe numbness, painful neuroma; superficial peroneal: dorsal-foot numbness; tibial (rare): plantar numbness
Prevention
Loupe magnification, blunt subcutaneous dissection, direct visualisation and gentle retraction of the sural nerve; stay anterior and superficial medially
Management
Reassurance for numbness (often improves 6-12 months); desensitisation and gabapentin for a neuroma; excision and burial in muscle if severe (about 50 percent success)
Persistent flatfoot deformity (15-25% of TC bars)
Recognition
Hindfoot valgus, medial arch collapse and talar-head prominence persist after resection
Prevention
Assess hindfoot flexibility intra-operatively; add an osteotomy if valgus persists (more common with TC bars)
Management
Custom orthotic and peroneal strengthening first; medialising calcaneal osteotomy or lateral-column lengthening if refractory at 6-12 months
Wound complications (5-10%)
Recognition
Superficial dehiscence, infection (erythema, drainage, fever) or haematoma
Prevention
Meticulous haemostasis with the tourniquet down before closure, layered closure, post-operative elevation, antibiotic prophylaxis
Management
Local wound care for small dehiscence; resuture if large and early; antibiotics (flucloxacillin or cephalexin) and debridement if deep; evacuate a large haematoma
Stiffness or adhesions (5-10%)
Recognition
Limited subtalar motion despite complete resection; no recurrent bar on CT
Prevention
Early range-of-motion exercises from 2-4 weeks, adequate interposition, avoid prolonged immobilisation (maximum 4 weeks in a cast)
Management
Aggressive physical therapy and mobilisations, NSAIDs; consider subtalar arthroscopy and adhesiolysis if refractory; fusion only as a last resort
Intra-operative fracture (2-5%)
Recognition
A crack felt or heard during osteotome work; navicular (CN) or sustentaculum (TC) fracture line on imaging
Prevention
Gentle osteotome technique (younger patients have thinner bone), image-intensifier confirmation, a curved osteotome for the TC bar
Management
Non-displaced: continue the resection with protected weight-bearing 4-6 weeks; displaced: K-wire or screw fixation if a large fragment
CRPS (2-5%)
Recognition
Disproportionate pain, allodynia, swelling, colour and temperature changes, restricted global motion
Prevention
Minimise surgical trauma, early mobilisation, adequate multimodal analgesia, vitamin C 500 mg daily perioperatively (controversial)
Management
Early recognition; pain team, desensitisation and graded motor imagery therapy, gabapentin or amitriptyline, sympathetic blocks if severe
Progression to fusion (5-10% long-term)
Recognition
Failed resection with persistent symptoms despite revision, or degenerative arthritis developing post-resection
Prevention
Proper patient selection (resect only if the bar is small, no arthritis), complete initial resection, warn patients pre-operatively
Management
Subtalar fusion for isolated subtalar arthritis; triple arthrodesis if the talonavicular and calcaneocuboid joints are also arthritic
Major complications of tarsal coalition resection
ComplicationRecognitionPreventionManagement
Recurrence or persistent symptoms (10-20%)Pain returns 6-24 months post-op; restricted subtalar motion; re-ossification or a residual bar on radiograph or CTComplete initial resection (normal bone both sides, 1 cm gap minimum) with adequate interposition and smoothed edgesConservative trial first; CT to size any recurrence; revision resection if small, fusion if large, arthritic or revision fails
Nerve injury (10-15%)Sural: lateral-foot or fifth-toe numbness, painful neuroma; superficial peroneal: dorsal-foot numbness; tibial (rare): plantar numbnessLoupe magnification, blunt subcutaneous dissection, direct visualisation and gentle retraction of the sural nerve; stay anterior and superficial mediallyReassurance for numbness (often improves 6-12 months); desensitisation and gabapentin for a neuroma; excision and burial in muscle if severe (about 50 percent success)
Persistent flatfoot deformity (15-25% of TC bars)Hindfoot valgus, medial arch collapse and talar-head prominence persist after resectionAssess hindfoot flexibility intra-operatively; add an osteotomy if valgus persists (more common with TC bars)Custom orthotic and peroneal strengthening first; medialising calcaneal osteotomy or lateral-column lengthening if refractory at 6-12 months
Wound complications (5-10%)Superficial dehiscence, infection (erythema, drainage, fever) or haematomaMeticulous haemostasis with the tourniquet down before closure, layered closure, post-operative elevation, antibiotic prophylaxisLocal wound care for small dehiscence; resuture if large and early; antibiotics (flucloxacillin or cephalexin) and debridement if deep; evacuate a large haematoma
Stiffness or adhesions (5-10%)Limited subtalar motion despite complete resection; no recurrent bar on CTEarly range-of-motion exercises from 2-4 weeks, adequate interposition, avoid prolonged immobilisation (maximum 4 weeks in a cast)Aggressive physical therapy and mobilisations, NSAIDs; consider subtalar arthroscopy and adhesiolysis if refractory; fusion only as a last resort
Intra-operative fracture (2-5%)A crack felt or heard during osteotome work; navicular (CN) or sustentaculum (TC) fracture line on imagingGentle osteotome technique (younger patients have thinner bone), image-intensifier confirmation, a curved osteotome for the TC barNon-displaced: continue the resection with protected weight-bearing 4-6 weeks; displaced: K-wire or screw fixation if a large fragment
CRPS (2-5%)Disproportionate pain, allodynia, swelling, colour and temperature changes, restricted global motionMinimise surgical trauma, early mobilisation, adequate multimodal analgesia, vitamin C 500 mg daily perioperatively (controversial)Early recognition; pain team, desensitisation and graded motor imagery therapy, gabapentin or amitriptyline, sympathetic blocks if severe
Progression to fusion (5-10% long-term)Failed resection with persistent symptoms despite revision, or degenerative arthritis developing post-resectionProper patient selection (resect only if the bar is small, no arthritis), complete initial resection, warn patients pre-operativelySubtalar fusion for isolated subtalar arthritis; triple arthrodesis if the talonavicular and calcaneocuboid joints are also arthritic

Viva & Exam Focus


Mnemonic

COALITIONCOALITION β€” when to resect

C
Child or adolescent
Younger than 18, growing skeleton
O
Ossification incomplete
Cartilaginous bars do as well or better than osseous
A
Arthritis absent
No degenerative changes in adjacent joints
L
Limited size
Small relative to the posterior facet (a guide, not absolute)
I
Initial surgery
Primary resection, not a revision
T
Tried conservative care
Orthotics, NSAIDs and activity modification have failed
I
Imaging confirms
CT shows a clear bar for surgical planning
O
One coalition
Isolated CN or TC, not multiple coalitions
N
No severe deformity
Flexible or correctable flatfoot, not rigid arthritis
Mnemonic

C-SIGNC-SIGN β€” radiographic signs of tarsal coalition

C
C-sign on lateral
Continuous C from the talar dome to the inferomedial sustentaculum indicates a TALOCALCANEAL bar, not calcaneonavicular
S
Sustentaculum blending
Irregular or sloping middle facet on the Harris axial view indicates a TC bar
I
Irregular navicular or anteater nose
Elongated anterior calcaneal process indicates a CN bar on the lateral and oblique views
G
Gone middle facet
Absent middle facet on the standing lateral or Harris view indicates a TC bar, around 75 percent sensitive
N
Narrowing of the posterior subtalar joint
A secondary degenerative change in chronic disease
Sural nerve
Where it lies
Crosses the Ollier incision 2-3 cm proximal to the lateral malleolus, subcutaneous, variable course
How to protect it
Loupe magnification, blunt subcutaneous dissection, identify and retract, or place the incision anterior to the nerve
Intermediate dorsal cutaneous nerve
Where it lies
A superficial-peroneal branch crossing the dorsum of the foot in the subcutaneous plane
How to protect it
Loupe magnification, identify during dissection, retract or protect with vessel loops
Peroneal tendons
Where it lies
Directly posterior to the CN bar, within their sheath behind the lateral malleolus
How to protect it
Palpate before osteotome use, place a deep posterior retractor, gentle retraction only
Posterior tibial neurovascular bundle
Where it lies
2-3 cm posterior and inferior to the medial malleolus, deep to the flexor retinaculum, between FDL and FHL in the TC medial approach
How to protect it
Identify the posterior tibialis tendon first as the anterior landmark, stay anterior and superficial, retract the bundle posteriorly, never dissect blind
Posterior subtalar facet
Where it lies
Immediately adjacent to the TC bar, posterior and lateral to the middle facet
How to protect it
Image intensifier to confirm the osteotome direction parallel to the facet, avoid excessive lateral resection
Five structures at risk β€” know them cold
Structure at riskWhere it liesHow to protect it
Sural nerveCrosses the Ollier incision 2-3 cm proximal to the lateral malleolus, subcutaneous, variable courseLoupe magnification, blunt subcutaneous dissection, identify and retract, or place the incision anterior to the nerve
Intermediate dorsal cutaneous nerveA superficial-peroneal branch crossing the dorsum of the foot in the subcutaneous planeLoupe magnification, identify during dissection, retract or protect with vessel loops
Peroneal tendonsDirectly posterior to the CN bar, within their sheath behind the lateral malleolusPalpate before osteotome use, place a deep posterior retractor, gentle retraction only
Posterior tibial neurovascular bundle2-3 cm posterior and inferior to the medial malleolus, deep to the flexor retinaculum, between FDL and FHL in the TC medial approachIdentify the posterior tibialis tendon first as the anterior landmark, stay anterior and superficial, retract the bundle posteriorly, never dissect blind
Posterior subtalar facetImmediately adjacent to the TC bar, posterior and lateral to the middle facetImage intensifier to confirm the osteotome direction parallel to the facet, avoid excessive lateral resection

Clinical Decision Scenarios

Practise clinical reasoning and management decisions out loud

Viva scenarioStandard
Clinical prompt

β€œA 14-year-old presents with painful rigid flatfoot. Describe your clinical assessment and imaging to diagnose tarsal coalition.”

Viva scenarioStandard
Clinical prompt

β€œYou are resecting a CN bar. Describe your surgical approach, your technique for complete resection, and your interposition method.”

Viva scenarioStandard
Clinical prompt

β€œCompare the surgical approach and challenges for TC bar resection versus CN bar. What are the key anatomical dangers?”

Exam day cheat sheet
Tarsal coalition resection β€” exam-day essentials

Essential concepts

  • A coalition is an abnormal cartilaginous, fibrous or osseous bridge between tarsal bones (failure of mesenchymal segmentation)
  • CN (45 percent) and TC (45 percent) account for 90 percent; bilateral in 50 to 60 percent; autosomal dominant inheritance
  • Presents aged 10 to 16 as the bar ossifies β€” a painful RIGID flatfoot with peroneal spasm and restricted subtalar motion
  • Imaging: anteater nose (CN); C-sign and absent middle facet (TC) on radiographs; CT is the gold standard for size, type, location and adjacent joints
  • Resect if small, no arthritis, young, correctable; fuse if large, arthritic, failed resection or fixed. The 50-percent guide is not absolute (Polt 2023)

CN bar steps

  • Ollier incision oblique over the sinus tarsi, lateral malleolus to navicular; protect the SURAL NERVE with loupe magnification
  • Reflect EDB superiorly β€” it overlies the bar and is preserved for interposition
  • Resect with a 10 to 15 mm osteotome superior to inferior; create a 1 to 1.5 cm gap; see normal bone both sides; confirm with the image intensifier
  • Interpose EDB muscle or a fat graft, sutured to both sides (2-0 Vicryl, 3 to 4 sutures)
  • Close in layers; cast or boot 2 to 4 weeks; start range of motion at 2 to 4 weeks; return to sport at 3 to 4 months

TC bar steps

  • Medial approach (middle facet) 2 cm posterior and inferior to the medial malleolus; mnemonic Tom, Dick And Nervous Harry
  • Posterior tibialis retracted anteriorly to expose the sustentaculum; the neurovascular bundle is the deepest structure
  • Resect with a curved osteotome medial to lateral, creating a 1 to 1.5 cm gap; protect the POSTERIOR FACET (do not enter it); the image intensifier is critical
  • Interpose a fat graft (heel pad or subcutaneous) or bone wax; suture or pack it securely
  • Add a calcaneal osteotomy if valgus persists (assess intra-operatively) β€” more common with TC (around 50 percent) than CN (around 10 percent)

Top dangers

  • SURAL NERVE (CN approach): crosses 2 to 3 cm proximal to the lateral malleolus; injury 10 to 15 percent = painful neuroma
  • NEUROVASCULAR BUNDLE (TC medial): the posterior tibial artery and nerve are deepest; stay superficial and anterior, retract posteriorly
  • POSTERIOR FACET (TC bar): adjacent to the bar; entering the healthy joint causes arthritis and failure

Radiographic signs

  • C-SIGN (lateral): a continuous C from the talar dome to the inferomedial sustentaculum indicates a TALOCALCANEAL bar (around 56 percent sensitive, near 100 percent specific)
  • ABSENT MIDDLE FACET (standing lateral or Harris axial): the most sensitive lateral sign for TC (around 75 percent sensitive, 98 percent specific)
  • TALAR BEAK (lateral): a non-specific secondary sign (around 53 percent sensitive), not a contraindication to resection
  • ANTEATER NOSE (lateral or oblique): an elongated anterior calcaneal process indicates a CN bar
  • CT: osseous (bone window), cartilaginous (intermediate), fibrous (irregular gap); measure the proportion of the facet and screen adjacent joints

Interposition evidence

  • WHY: interposed material prevents re-ossification across the gap and lowers reoperation
  • CN bar: EDB muscle or a fat graft β€” EDB fills only about 64 percent of the gap (Mubarak), so a fat graft is favoured to fill it completely
  • TC bar: a fat graft or bone wax (simple, non-biological)
  • Suture or secure it in place β€” dislodgement risks recurrence; fill the gap completely
  • Evidence (Mubarak 2009, fat graft for CN): around 5 percent reossification requiring repeat resection, 87 percent return to sport

Background & Evidence


Epidemiology. Tarsal coalition is present from birth (a failure of mesenchymal segmentation) and remains cartilaginous or fibrous until adolescence. It ossifies between 8 and 16 years β€” CN bars earlier than TC bars β€” which is why symptoms begin then. It is bilateral in 50 to 60 percent of patients (examine both feet), follows autosomal dominant inheritance with incomplete penetrance, and around 25 percent remain asymptomatic. Pathophysiology of the rigid flatfoot. The coalition restricts subtalar motion (normal 20 to 30 degrees of inversion and eversion falls to 0 to 10 degrees). A compensatory hindfoot valgus develops, the peroneals contract to stabilise the unstable hindfoot (peroneal spasm), and the talar head is uncovered medially (the "too many toes" sign). Secondary changes follow: talar beaking in around 25 percent (a dorsal talar-neck osteophyte from altered mechanics), a ball-and-socket ankle in around 5 percent (a compensatory change), and midfoot arthritis in chronic cases. Coalition types and distribution. Calcaneonavicular and talocalcaneal bars together account for about 90 percent of coalitions.

Calcaneonavicular (CN)
Frequency
Around 45 percent
Location
Sinus tarsi region, between the anterior calcaneal process and the lateral navicular
Imaging sign
Anteater-nose sign (lateral and oblique)
Approach
Lateral (Ollier) β€” superficial, easier exposure
Talocalcaneal (TC)
Frequency
Around 45 percent
Location
Most common at the middle facet (medial, sustentaculum tali); less often the posterior facet
Imaging sign
C-sign and absent middle facet
Approach
Medial for the middle facet; lateral sinus-tarsi for the posterior facet
Other (talonavicular, calcaneocuboid)
Frequency
Around 10 percent
Location
Various; talonavicular usually needs fusion rather than resection
Imaging sign
Variable
Approach
Individualised
Coalition types β€” distribution and surgical relevance
CoalitionFrequencyLocationImaging signApproach
Calcaneonavicular (CN)Around 45 percentSinus tarsi region, between the anterior calcaneal process and the lateral navicularAnteater-nose sign (lateral and oblique)Lateral (Ollier) β€” superficial, easier exposure
Talocalcaneal (TC)Around 45 percentMost common at the middle facet (medial, sustentaculum tali); less often the posterior facetC-sign and absent middle facetMedial for the middle facet; lateral sinus-tarsi for the posterior facet
Other (talonavicular, calcaneocuboid)Around 10 percentVarious; talonavicular usually needs fusion rather than resectionVariableIndividualised
Around 10 to 15 percent of patients have more than one coalition, which carries a worse prognosis β€” screen for it on CT. CN bars are usually in the middle third of the potential articulation, 1 to 2 cm wide anteroposteriorly, and may be osseous, cartilaginous or fibrous; TC bars are osseous in around 70 percent, cartilaginous in around 20 percent and fibrous in around 10 percent. Prognostic factors. Favourable: a small bar relative to the posterior facet, a younger and more skeletally immature patient, a cartilaginous or fibrous rather than dense osseous bar, a CN rather than TC location, no adjacent-joint arthritis, correctable hindfoot valgus, complete resection with secured interposition, and good rehabilitation. Unfavourable: a large bar, established adjacent-joint arthritis, severe fixed rigid flatfoot or marked heel valgus (Wilde over 16 degrees, Luhmann over 21 degrees linked to poorer outcome), incomplete resection, multiple coalitions and poor rehabilitation compliance. Key evidence. Mubarak (2009) established fat-graft interposition for CN bars with around 87 percent return to sport and only around 5 percent symptomatic regrowth, and showed in a cadaveric arm that EDB fills only about 64 percent of the gap. For TC bars, Wilde (1994) defined the classic 50-percent-of-posterior-facet and 16-degree heel-valgus thresholds and showed talar beaking does not impair results; Comfort and Johnson (1998) reported around 77 percent good or excellent results when the coalition involved one third or less of the joint; and Luhmann and Schoenecker (1998) found that although larger bars and greater valgus fared worse, good results still occurred, advising the criteria be used for counselling rather than to decide resection versus arthrodesis. The Polt (2023) systematic review of 760 coalitions confirmed improved outcomes in around 78.8 percent with around 4.96 percent complications, and found coalition size was not a determining factor β€” the contemporary basis for weighing arthritis, deformity and symptoms over a single percentage.

References


Evidence

Calcaneonavicular coalition: treatment by excision and fat graft

Level IV
Mubarak SJ, Patel PN, Upasani VV, Moor MA, Wenger DR β€’ Journal of Pediatric Orthopedics (2009)
Key Findings:
  • Retrospective paediatric series of CN coalition resection with FAT GRAFT (not EDB) interposition; 87 percent returned to sport or prior activities at one year
  • Only 5 percent had symptomatic regrowth requiring repeat resection; subtalar motion improved in 74 percent and plantarflexion in 82 percent
  • The cadaveric arm showed EDB fills only about 64 percent of the resected gap, leaving roughly 10 mm of the plantar gap unfilled β€” the rationale for preferring a fat graft
Clinical implication: Fat-graft interposition fills the resection gap more completely than EDB and is associated with low reossification and high return to sport; it is a valid first-choice interposition for CN coalition.
Verify on PubMed (PMID 19568010)
Evidence

Resection for symptomatic talocalcaneal coalition

Level IV
Wilde PH, Torode IP, Dickens DR, Cole WG β€’ Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (British) (1994)
Key Findings:
  • Twenty feet (patients under 16) with persistently symptomatic TC coalition treated by bar resection over a 9-year period
  • Good or excellent results when the coalition was 50 percent or less of the posterior facet AND heel valgus was under 16 degrees with no posterior-facet arthritis
  • Fair or poor results when the coalition exceeded 50 percent of the posterior facet, heel valgus exceeded 16 degrees, or there was posterior-facet narrowing; talar beaking (present in 70 percent) did NOT impair the result
Clinical implication: Patient selection for TC bar resection should weigh facet involvement, heel valgus and adjacent arthritis β€” the classic 50-percent and 16-degree thresholds. Talar beaking alone is not a contraindication.
Verify on PubMed (PMID 8083272)
Evidence

Resection for symptomatic talocalcaneal coalition

Level IV
Comfort TK, Johnson LO β€’ Journal of Pediatric Orthopedics (1998)
Key Findings:
  • Twenty TC resections; good or excellent results in 77 percent when the coalition involved one third or less of the joint surface
  • Increasing age was not a contraindication to resection
  • A varus subgroup did poorly
Clinical implication: A TC coalition involving one third or less of the joint surface does well with resection; age alone should not exclude a patient, but a varus deformity should prompt caution.
Verify on PubMed (PMID 9600549)
Evidence

Symptomatic talocalcaneal coalition resection: indications and results

Level IV
Luhmann SJ, Schoenecker PL β€’ Journal of Pediatric Orthopedics (1998)
Key Findings:
  • Twenty-five feet, mean AOFAS hindfoot score 81.9
  • Coalition greater than 50 percent of the posterior facet and heel valgus greater than 21 degrees were associated with poorer outcome, but good results still occurred in those groups
  • The authors advise using these CT criteria for counselling rather than to decide resection versus arthrodesis
Clinical implication: Even larger TC bars and greater heel valgus can do well; size and valgus thresholds should inform counselling, not rigidly exclude patients from resection.
Verify on PubMed (PMID 9821130)
Evidence

Outcomes of surgical management for tarsal coalitions: a systematic review

Level III
Polt M, Graf DA, Brunner S, Helmy N, Tondelli T, Karczewski D, Andronic O β€’ Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery (2023)
Key Findings:
  • Systematic review and meta-analysis of 25 studies and 760 tarsal coalitions, weighted mean follow-up 44 months
  • Open bar resection with material interposition achieved good or excellent or improved patient-reported outcomes in 78.8 percent; overall complications occurred in 4.96 percent of cases
  • Coalition size was NOT a determining factor for postoperative outcome β€” the arbitrary 50-percent posterior-facet threshold had little importance in decision-making
Clinical implication: Contemporary pooled evidence supports open resection with interposition for most symptomatic coalitions, and challenges rigid reliance on a single size cutoff when selecting resection versus fusion.
Verify on PubMed (PMID 37462747)
Evidence

Talocalcaneal coalition: diagnosis with the C-sign on lateral radiographs of the ankle

Level III
Sakellariou A, Sallomi D, Janzen DL, Munk PL, Claridge RJ, Kiri VA β€’ Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (British) (2000)
Key Findings:
  • A blinded multi-observer study of 42 weight-bearing lateral ankle radiographs (20 TC coalition, 22 controls) using CT as the reference standard
  • The C-sign was highly sensitive and specific for TALOCALCANEAL coalition and significantly more reliable than other recognised radiographic signs
  • The C-sign cannot distinguish a fibrous from an osseous bar β€” CT remains necessary to characterise type and size
Clinical implication: The C-sign is a screening sign for talocalcaneal (not calcaneonavicular) coalition on the lateral radiograph; a positive sign should prompt CT for surgical planning.
Verify on PubMed (PMID 10855886)
Evidence

Absent middle facet: a sign on unenhanced radiography of subtalar joint coalition

Level III
Liu PT, Roberts CC, Chivers FS, Kile TA, Claridge RJ, DeMartini JR, Kenrich RE, Freed LH β€’ American Journal of Roentgenology (2003)
Key Findings:
  • Ninety-four feet (32 with proven middle-facet coalition) graded blindly on standing lateral radiographs by three musculoskeletal radiologists
  • Absent middle facet sign: sensitivity 75 percent, specificity 98 percent, accuracy 90 percent β€” more sensitive than the C-sign (56 percent) or the talar beak sign (53 percent)
  • Combining a positive absent-middle-facet sign OR C-sign raised sensitivity to 84 percent with 98 percent specificity
Clinical implication: On the standing lateral radiograph, the absent middle facet is the single most sensitive sign of subtalar (TC) coalition; use it together with the C-sign, and confirm with CT.
Verify on PubMed (PMID 14627576)
Editorially reviewed β€” transparent references and correction processPublished by OrthoVellum Medical Education TeamEditorial boardMethodologyReview policy
Educational disclosure

Educational content is reviewed for source visibility, editorial coherence, and correction readiness.

No individual clinician credential is claimed unless a named person is shown.

Verify before clinical use; this is not medical advice or a substitute for local guidance.

Procedure console
18 minutes
Read
0
Sections
intermediate
Level
Peer-reviewed Β· 2026-06-20
Procedure info
Level
intermediate
Read time
18 minutes
Updated
2026-06-20
Browse all procedures