Skip to main content
OrthoVellumOrthopaedic Exam Prep
Pricing
About OrthoVellum
OrthoVellum
A living orthopaedic atlas

Exam-focused orthopaedic references, a question bank, viva practice, and spaced-repetition revision — with every clinical claim traceable to its source. Content is educational only and is not a substitute for local supervision, clinical judgement, or institutional policy.


Library

  • Clinical Topics
  • Blog
  • Site Updates
  • Content Methodology

Company

  • About Us
  • Authors & Disclosure
  • Editorial Team
  • Editorial Policy
  • Advertising Policy

Legal

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Medical Disclaimer
  • Copyright & DMCA

Support

  • Support OrthoVellum
  • Help Center
  • Contact
  • Accessibility
Evidence. Clarity. Practice.

© 2026 OrthoVellum. For educational purposes only.

Not medical advice. Verify clinically important information against current local guidance.

Tendon Transfers for Median and Ulnar Nerve Palsy

Operative SurgeryHand & Wrist
Hand & WristIntermediateCore Procedure

Tendon Transfers for Median and Ulnar Nerve Palsy

Operative guide to tendon transfers for irreversible median and ulnar nerve palsies — the Brand EIP opponensplasty (median palsy workhorse) and the Zancolli lasso and FDS four-tail for ulnar claw correction, plus adductor reconstruction for Froment's sign. advanced orthopaedic operative-surgery guide.

Procedure console
20
Read
0
Sections
intermediate
Level
Peer-reviewed · 2026-06-20
High-yield overview

Reconstruction of thumb opposition, key pinch and claw correction after irreversible median or ulnar nerve injury · OASES-SP principles

85 to 90%Good-excellent outcomes
M4Minimum donor strength
3 weeksImmobilisation before active motion
3 to 6 moTypical final recovery
Critical Must-Knows
  • Median palsy loses thumb opposition (APB paralysis — thumb lies in the plane of the palm). Ulnar palsy loses key pinch (adductor pollicis) and develops clawing of ring and small fingers (interossei/lumbricals); Froment's sign is positive.
  • Recite the eight transfer principles FIRST (OASES-SP): one function per tendon, adequate strength (M4 minimum — a transfer loses one grade), synergistic action, expendable donor, straight line of pull, soft-tissue equilibrium, full passive ROM. Correct any fixed contracture before transfer.
  • Wait 3 to 6 months after nerve injury for spontaneous recovery and confirm irreversibility with EMG/NCS before transfer; do not wait beyond 12 months, because prolonged denervation causes irreversible muscle fibrosis.
  • The workhorse median transfer is the Brand or Burkhalter EIP opponensplasty — harvest EIP (ulnar to EDC), route it subcutaneously around the ulnar border of the wrist toward the pisiform, insert into the APB remnant, and tension so the thumb opposes the BASE of the small finger (not the tip).
  • The Pulvertaft weave needs 3 or more passes with non-absorbable suture, and the hand is immobilised for 3 weeks before active motion — the sweet spot, since earlier motion risks rupture and later motion risks adhesions.

When & Why


Indication. A patient with an irreversible median or ulnar nerve injury — confirmed by no clinical or EMG recovery 3 to 6 months after injury or repair — and a corresponding functional deficit that is inadequately compensated, provided the prerequisites for transfer are met. The four deficits worth reconstructing are thumb opposition (median), weak key pinch (ulnar, Froment's sign), clawing of the ring and small fingers (ulnar), and lost flexion of the thumb or ring and small fingers (high lesions). What each palsy loses determines the transfer plan:

Low median

Lost thumb opposition only (APB paralysed). Sensation usually intact. Reconstruction is opponensplasty alone.

High median

Opposition lost, plus FPL (thumb IP flexion) and FDP to index and middle, and pronator teres. Multiple transfers required, staged.

Low ulnar

Clawing of ring and small fingers (MCP hyperextension, IP flexion), weak key pinch (adductor pollicis, positive Froment's) and weak grip (interossei). FDP is intact, so clawing is severe.

High ulnar

All of the above, plus FDP to ring and small is paralysed — so there is paradoxically LESS clawing (the ulnar paradox). Reconstruction priority is FDP side-to-side tenodesis plus intrinsic/adductor work.

Combined

Both median and ulnar deficits. Reconstruction is staged and donor choice is constrained by what remains expendable.

The principles gate everything

No transfer proceeds until passive ROM is full, the soft-tissue envelope is stable, donor muscles are M4 or stronger, and the patient will commit to therapy.

Timing of tendon transfer

Wait 3 to 6 months after nerve injury for spontaneous recovery. If there is no clinical or EMG improvement, proceed with transfer. Do not wait beyond 12 months — prolonged denervation causes irreversible muscle fibrosis and a poor result regardless of technique.

The eight principles — recite them first. Every successful transfer must satisfy the OASES-SP criteria, and examiners expect them stated before any technique. They are also the framework for choosing a donor:

1. Expendable donor

Loss of the donor must cause minimal deficit and be compensated by remaining tendons (e.g. EIP is expendable because EDC still extends the index). Never sacrifice an essential function.

2. Adequate strength (M4 or greater)

A transferred muscle loses one grade — an M5 donor becomes M4 (functional), an M3 donor becomes M2 (unacceptable). Check every donor preoperatively.

3. One function per tendon

Each transfer performs a single function; do not split one tendon to multiple insertions (the Brand four-tail is the exception, but it still serves one function — intrinsic rebalancing).

4. Straight line of pull

Route the donor directly to its new insertion; avoid sharp angles (friction, bowstringing, lost efficiency) and use a pulley where the vector demands it.

5. Synergistic action

A donor that moves naturally with the new action (e.g. finger extension with thumb opposition) is easier for the patient to relearn — preferable, not essential.

6. Adequate amplitude

Donor excursion must match the recipient need: opponensplasty needs 3 to 5 cm, intrinsic transfers 2 to 3 cm. FDS gives 7 cm, EIP/EDC about 5 cm, wrist motors only about 3 cm (often insufficient without a graft).

7. Soft-tissue equilibrium

No active scarring, contracture or infection, and stable cover. Correct contractures before transfer — a transfer cannot create motion beyond the passive range.

8. Single joint crossed

Cross only one joint where possible to limit the tenodesis effect and improve control; some intrinsic transfers necessarily cross both MCP and IP and are the accepted exception.

Preoperative assessment. Confirm the lesion is irreversible and that the prerequisites are met before listing for surgery.

Nerve recovery
Requirement
No improvement at 3 to 6 months on EMG/NCS
Action if not met
Wait and re-image if still improving
Passive ROM
Requirement
Full passive motion of all joints
Action if not met
Release contractures first
Donor strength
Requirement
M4 or greater in every intended donor
Action if not met
Choose an alternative donor
Soft tissue
Requirement
Healed, supple, no infection
Action if not met
Delay until resolved
Patient compliance
Requirement
Motivated and understands the rehab commitment
Action if not met
Counsel or reconsider
Preoperative checklist
AssessmentRequirementAction if not met
Nerve recoveryNo improvement at 3 to 6 months on EMG/NCSWait and re-image if still improving
Passive ROMFull passive motion of all jointsRelease contractures first
Donor strengthM4 or greater in every intended donorChoose an alternative donor
Soft tissueHealed, supple, no infectionDelay until resolved
Patient complianceMotivated and understands the rehab commitmentCounsel or reconsider

Setup. Supine, arm on a hand table, shoulder abducted about 90 degrees, upper-arm tourniquet, regional or general anaesthesia. Loupe magnification helps nerve and vessel identification. Consent specifically for a transfer that restores function but not normal strength (expect M3 to M4 final), donor-site morbidity, loss of independent donor function, juncture rupture (2 to 5 percent), and the prolonged therapy requirement.

The Operation


The goal is to redirect an expendable, adequately strong, synergistic donor tendon along a straight line to the paralysed insertion, tensioned precisely and secured with a Pulvertaft weave. The Brand EIP opponensplasty is the median-palsy workhorse and is laid out in full below; the ulnar-palsy transfers (Zancolli lasso, FDS four-tail, adductor reconstruction) follow the same principles with different donors and insertions.

Intra-operative tendon transfer in the hand
Intra-operative photograph of a tendon transfer in the palm, the donor tendon routed and prepared for re-insertion.Credit: OrthoVellum surgical illustration
Thumb opposition (low/high median)
Preferred transfer
Brand or Burkhalter EIP opponensplasty
Donor
EIP
Notes
Workhorse; synergistic and expendable
Thumb opposition — alternatives
Preferred transfer
Royle-Thompson FDS, Phalen-Miller APL, Camitz PL
Donor
FDS ring / APL / PL
Notes
FDS for high demand; PL for elderly, low demand
Ulnar claw (low demand, elderly)
Preferred transfer
Zancolli FDP lasso
Donor
FDP itself
Notes
Simplest; loses 10 to 20 degrees of DIP flexion
Ulnar claw (young, high demand)
Preferred transfer
FDS four-tail (modified Stiles-Bunnell)
Donor
FDS middle or ring
Notes
Physiological, active IP extension, no DIP loss
Weak key pinch (Froment's)
Preferred transfer
EIP or ECRL to adductor pollicis
Donor
EIP / ECRL
Notes
Release first-web contracture first
Lost ring/small flexion (high ulnar)
Preferred transfer
Side-to-side tenodesis to ulnar FDP
Donor
FDP middle (median)
Notes
Restores mass flexion; ECRL-to-FDP if independence wanted
Choosing the transfer — donor by deficit
DeficitPreferred transferDonorNotes
Thumb opposition (low/high median)Brand or Burkhalter EIP opponensplastyEIPWorkhorse; synergistic and expendable
Thumb opposition — alternativesRoyle-Thompson FDS, Phalen-Miller APL, Camitz PLFDS ring / APL / PLFDS for high demand; PL for elderly, low demand
Ulnar claw (low demand, elderly)Zancolli FDP lassoFDP itselfSimplest; loses 10 to 20 degrees of DIP flexion
Ulnar claw (young, high demand)FDS four-tail (modified Stiles-Bunnell)FDS middle or ringPhysiological, active IP extension, no DIP loss
Weak key pinch (Froment's)EIP or ECRL to adductor pollicisEIP / ECRLRelease first-web contracture first
Lost ring/small flexion (high ulnar)Side-to-side tenodesis to ulnar FDPFDP middle (median)Restores mass flexion; ECRL-to-FDP if independence wanted

Brand EIP opponensplasty — the median-palsy workhorse (full exposure and steps)

Step 1Position, landmarks and the donor identification test
  • Supine, hand table, upper-arm tourniquet, shoulder abducted about 90 degrees, thumb free to oppose.
  • Identify EIP before any incision. EIP lies ulnar to EDC-index over the index metacarpal. Confirm the test: with the MCP joints flexed, EIP can extend the index independently — EDC cannot. Cutting EDC instead of EIP causes a permanent index extension deficit.
Step 2Harvest the EIP tendon (dorsal index)
  • Longitudinal incision over the dorsal second metacarpal (about 6 to 8 cm), centred over the index MCP, exposing the extensor apparatus.
  • Protect the superficial radial nerve branches in the subcutaneous plane — division causes a painful neuroma and dorsoradial numbness.
  • Divide EIP at its insertion on the index extensor hood; confirm EDC-index still delivers full extension, then free EIP proximally with blunt dissection to the musculotendinous junction.
Step 3Protect the posterior interosseous nerve during proximal release
  • The PIN lies deep to supinator in the proximal forearm and emerges between the superficial and deep EDC. When freeing EIP proximally, stay superficial and on bone; do not chase the muscle belly deep.
  • PIN injury is devastating — it paralyses finger and thumb extension and demands further reconstruction.
Step 4Route EIP around the ulnar border of the wrist toward the pisiform
  • Retrieve EIP into a short transverse or oblique distal-forearm incision.
  • Create a wide, superficial subcutaneous tunnel sweeping around the ulnar border of the wrist toward the pisiform, then volar across to the thumb. The pisiform acts as the functional pulley that recreates the abductor pollicis brevis line of pull.
  • Identify and protect the dorsal sensory branch of the ulnar nerve, which crosses this exact subcutaneous tunnel — division causes a painful dorsoulnar neuroma.
  • The transfer must approach the thumb from the ulnar and proximal direction to deliver true opposition (palmar abduction plus pronation); a purely radial route gives only radial abduction.
Step 5Insert into the APB remnant at the thumb
  • Volar-radial incision over the thumb MCP along the thenar crease (2 to 3 cm); protect the radial digital nerve.
  • Identify the APB insertion on the radial base of the proximal phalanx (it may be atrophied to a remnant).
  • Pass EIP through a subcutaneous tunnel from wrist to thumb without twisting or kinking, then Pulvertaft weave (3 or more passes, 3-0 non-absorbable suture such as Ethibond or FiberWire) into the APB remnant — or into a bone tunnel in the proximal phalanx if the APB is absent.
Step 6Tensioning — the critical step (base, not tip)
  • With the wrist neutral and the thumb MCP slightly flexed (30 to 40 degrees), tension so the thumb comfortably opposes the base of the small finger.
  • Do not tension to the tip of the small finger — that is too tight and the thumb will not adduct back to the palm.
  • Confirm the thumb can still adduct to the palm without excessive force; check the tension by passively flexing and extending the wrist (tenodesis check).
Step 7Closure and splintage
  • Absorbable subcuticular skin closure, steri-strips and a soft dressing.
  • Apply a thumb spica with the thumb in full opposition to the small finger, wrist neutral, forearm included for stability.
  • Immobilise strictly for 3 weeks; remove skin sutures at 2 weeks.
Step 8Rehabilitation and expected outcome
  • Weeks 0 to 3: strict immobilisation, edema control, no active motion.
  • Weeks 3 to 6: splint off for therapy; active opposition exercises and motor re-education (learning to fire EIP for opposition); splint between sessions.
  • Weeks 6 to 12: progressive strengthening and functional activity; wean the splint.
  • Months 3 to 6: full strengthening and return to full duty. Expect 85 to 95 percent functional opposition, pulp-to-pulp pinch restored, and strength 60 to 80 percent of the normal side.
The two nerves you must protect in EIP harvest and routing

The posterior interosseous nerve (deep to supinator) is at risk freeing EIP proximally — stay superficial. The dorsal sensory branch of the ulnar nerve crosses the subcutaneous ulnar-border routing tunnel — identify and retract it. Division of either is a serious, avoidable complication.

EIP versus EDC — confirm before you cut

EIP is ulnar to EDC-index. Flex all MCP joints and test independent index extension: EIP can extend the index alone, EDC cannot. Confirm this before dividing — cutting EDC leaves a permanent index extension lag.

Tensioning the opponensplasty — base, not tip

Tension the EIP so the thumb opposes the base of the small finger with the wrist neutral. Tensioning to the tip is the classic error — the transfer ends up too tight and the thumb cannot adduct back to the palm.

Reconstructing the ulnar-palsy hand Two claw corrections and one adductor reconstruction cover most ulnar-palsy hands. Always release a tight first web space before adductor reconstruction, and stage combined work when the soft-tissue envelope needs to settle.

Zancolli FDP lasso — the simplest claw correction

Step 1Exposure through Bruner incisions
  • Bruner zigzag incisions over the A1 pulleys of the ring and small fingers (add the middle finger if involved), centred on the proximal digital crease.
  • Protect the neurovascular bundles — the ulnar digital nerve to the small finger runs along the ulnar border; retract it radially and never cut directly over it.
  • Identify the A1 pulley (transverse fibres at MCP level) and the FDP tendon deep to FDS.
Step 2Split FDP and form the lasso around A1
  • Split FDP longitudinally into two equal slips for 2 to 3 cm proximal to A1.
  • Pass one slip volar and one dorsal to the A1 pulley to form the lasso; A1 becomes the pulley for FDP. Do not release A2 or A4 — they prevent bowstringing.
Step 3Tension at MCP 70 degrees (not 90)
  • Tension with the MCP flexed 70 degrees and the wrist neutral; the IP joints should extend fully and passively.
  • Tenodesis check: extending the wrist flexes the MCP more; flexing the wrist extends it slightly.
  • Suture the two FDS/FDP slips to each other with 3-0 non-absorbable suture.
Step 4Closure, splintage and rehab
  • Skin closure, hand-based splint with the MCP at 70 degrees, IP joints extended, wrist neutral.
  • Strict immobilisation 3 weeks, then active MCP flexion and passive IP extension, then strengthening from week 6.
  • Expect claw correction in 85 to 90 percent, at the cost of 10 to 20 degrees of DIP flexion (FDP force is redirected to flex the MCP).
Zancolli tension — 70 degrees, not 90

Over-tensioning the lasso to 90 degrees causes an MCP flexion contracture and swan-neck deformity that is hard to reverse. 70 degrees is the number. The accepted trade-off is a 10 to 20 degree loss of DIP flexion — warn the patient preoperatively.

FDS four-tail (modified Stiles-Bunnell) — the physiological claw correction

Step 1Harvest the FDS donor
  • Volar zigzag incision over the donor finger (usually middle or ring); divide FDS at its insertion on the middle phalanx and free it from the vincula, then retrieve it proximally into the palm. Confirm FDP is still functional.
Step 2Split into four tails and route through the lumbrical canals
  • Split FDS longitudinally into four equal slips (one per finger).
  • Pass each tail through the lumbrical canal on the radial side of each finger, volar to the transverse metacarpal ligament, out to the lateral band.
Step 3Weave into the lateral bands and tension
  • Pulvertaft weave each tail into the lateral band at the proximal-phalanx level (2 to 3 passes, 4-0 non-absorbable suture).
  • Tension with the MCP at 70 degrees and the IP joints fully extended, equal on all four tails; check by passive wrist motion. Immobilise 3 weeks, then mobilise as for the lasso.
Eponym precision — four-tail versus Brand

A four-tail transfer using FDS as the motor split to the lateral bands (or A1/A2 pulleys) is the modified Stiles-Bunnell procedure. Brand's original intrinsic reconstruction used a wrist extensor (ECRB/ECRL) plus a free tendon graft split into four tails. The FDS version is often loosely called "Brand four-tail" in practice, but examiners may expect you to attribute the FDS donor to Stiles-Bunnell.

EIP-to-adductor pollicis — eliminating Froment's sign

Step 1Release the first web space first (essential)
  • Chronic ulnar palsy develops an adduction contracture. Release the contracted first dorsal interosseous and adductor fascia until full passive thumb abduction is achieved. If this is skipped, the adductor transfer will be too tight and the thumb cannot abduct.
Step 2Harvest, route and insert EIP into the adductor
  • Harvest EIP exactly as for opponensplasty.
  • Route it through the second intermetacarpal space (or subcutaneously across the dorsum) to the ulnar base of the thumb proximal phalanx (the adductor insertion) with a straight line of pull.
  • Weave into the adductor insertion (or a bone tunnel if tendon quality is poor).
Step 3Tension and rehab
  • Tension with the thumb adducted to the side of the index finger, the thumb IP extended (not flexed), wrist neutral, gentle adduction force.
  • Thumb spica 3 weeks, active adduction from week 3, strengthening from week 6, full function by 3 to 6 months. Froment's sign is eliminated in about 90 percent and key pinch improves 50 to 80 percent.
Donor
Zancolli lasso
FDP itself (no separate donor)
FDS four-tail
FDS of one finger
Complexity and operative time
Zancolli lasso
Simple, shorter
FDS four-tail
More complex, longer
Claw correction
Zancolli lasso
Good
FDS four-tail
Marginally better (RCT)
Grip-strength return
Zancolli lasso
Faster and slightly higher (RCT)
FDS four-tail
Good
IP extension
Zancolli lasso
Passive (tenodesis)
FDS four-tail
Active, via the lateral bands
DIP flexion loss
Zancolli lasso
10 to 20 degrees
FDS four-tail
None (FDP preserved)
Best for
Zancolli lasso
Faster recovery, grip priority, elderly
FDS four-tail
Young, high demand, claw-correction priority
Zancolli lasso versus FDS four-tail (modified Stiles-Bunnell)
FeatureZancolli lassoFDS four-tail
DonorFDP itself (no separate donor)FDS of one finger
Complexity and operative timeSimple, shorterMore complex, longer
Claw correctionGoodMarginally better (RCT)
Grip-strength returnFaster and slightly higher (RCT)Good
IP extensionPassive (tenodesis)Active, via the lateral bands
DIP flexion loss10 to 20 degreesNone (FDP preserved)
Best forFaster recovery, grip priority, elderlyYoung, high demand, claw-correction priority
The Pulvertaft weave and general tensioning

The Pulvertaft weave is the strongest juncture — 3 to 6 passes with non-absorbable 3-0 suture; it withstands more than 250 N biomechanically. Tensioning is the most critical step: too tight causes a swan-neck or boutonniere deformity, too loose gives inadequate function. Use intraoperative passive wrist motion to test, and apply these targets — opponensplasty to the base of the small finger, FPL reconstruction with the IP at 20 to 30 degrees flexion, intrinsic reconstruction with the MCP at 70 degrees.

Aftercare & Complications


Rehabilitation | Phase | Timing | Immobilisation | Therapy | |-------|--------|----------------|---------| | 1 — Protection | 0 to 3 weeks | Splint in the transfer-specific position | No active motion; edema control; ROM of uninvolved digits | | 2 — Early active | 3 to 6 weeks | Removable splint | Gentle active motion of the transfer; motor re-education; splint between sessions | | 3 — Strengthening | 6 to 12 weeks | Splint weaned | Progressive resistance and functional activity | | 4 — Maturation | 3 to 6 months | None | Full strengthening; return to work; final outcome | Most patients return to desk work by about 6 to 12 weeks and full duty by 3 to 6 months. Around 85 to 90 percent achieve a good or excellent result; final strength is typically M3 to M4 (a transfer cannot restore normal strength — set this expectation preoperatively).

The three-week sweet spot for mobilisation

Starting active motion before 3 weeks risks juncture rupture; starting after 6 weeks risks adhesions and stiffness. Three weeks is the sweet spot for most transfers. A rupture in weeks 3 to 6 presents as sudden loss of function and needs reoperation and re-weaving.

Juncture rupture (2 to 5 percent)
Recognition
Sudden loss of function, typically weeks 3 to 6
Prevention
Strict 3-week immobilisation; 3 or more Pulvertaft passes
Management
Reoperation, re-weave, re-immobilise
Incorrect donor harvested
Recognition
Index extension lag after EDC cut; FDP cut for FDS
Prevention
Confirm independent function before division; EIP is ulnar to EDC
Management
Repair the donor if recognised intra-op; revise the plan
Cutaneous nerve injury (SRN, dorsal ulnar branch, digital)
Recognition
Numbness or a tender Tinel at the scar
Prevention
Identify and retract branches under loupe; superficial atraumatic dissection
Management
Usually settles; persistent neuroma — desensitisation, injection, excision or bury
PIN injury during EIP harvest
Recognition
Loss of finger and thumb extension
Prevention
Stay superficial and on bone freeing EIP proximally
Management
Further reconstruction required; devastating
Under-tensioning
Recognition
Weak opposition or pinch; cannot reach the small finger
Prevention
Tension to the base of the small finger; intra-op tenodesis check
Management
Revision re-tensioning
Over-tensioning (swan-neck, MCP contracture)
Recognition
Thumb cannot adduct; PIP hyperextension after intrinsic transfer
Prevention
Opponensplasty to base not tip; Zancolli 70 degrees not 90
Management
Release or re-tension the transfer; spiral splint; occasionally arthrodesis
Adhesions or stiffness
Recognition
Limited motion despite therapy beyond 3 months
Prevention
Early protected motion at 3 weeks; supervised therapy
Management
Intensive therapy; tenolysis after 6 months if plateaued
Loss of donor function
Recognition
Deficit in the harvested tendon's original action
Prevention
Verify the donor is expendable and test it preoperatively
Management
Counselling; occasional reconstruction
Complications — recognition, prevention, management
ComplicationRecognitionPreventionManagement
Juncture rupture (2 to 5 percent)Sudden loss of function, typically weeks 3 to 6Strict 3-week immobilisation; 3 or more Pulvertaft passesReoperation, re-weave, re-immobilise
Incorrect donor harvestedIndex extension lag after EDC cut; FDP cut for FDSConfirm independent function before division; EIP is ulnar to EDCRepair the donor if recognised intra-op; revise the plan
Cutaneous nerve injury (SRN, dorsal ulnar branch, digital)Numbness or a tender Tinel at the scarIdentify and retract branches under loupe; superficial atraumatic dissectionUsually settles; persistent neuroma — desensitisation, injection, excision or bury
PIN injury during EIP harvestLoss of finger and thumb extensionStay superficial and on bone freeing EIP proximallyFurther reconstruction required; devastating
Under-tensioningWeak opposition or pinch; cannot reach the small fingerTension to the base of the small finger; intra-op tenodesis checkRevision re-tensioning
Over-tensioning (swan-neck, MCP contracture)Thumb cannot adduct; PIP hyperextension after intrinsic transferOpponensplasty to base not tip; Zancolli 70 degrees not 90Release or re-tension the transfer; spiral splint; occasionally arthrodesis
Adhesions or stiffnessLimited motion despite therapy beyond 3 monthsEarly protected motion at 3 weeks; supervised therapyIntensive therapy; tenolysis after 6 months if plateaued
Loss of donor functionDeficit in the harvested tendon's original actionVerify the donor is expendable and test it preoperativelyCounselling; occasional reconstruction
Patient age
Good prognosis
Younger, active
Poor prognosis
Elderly, sedentary
Compliance
Good prognosis
Motivated, follows therapy
Poor prognosis
Poor attendance
Passive ROM
Good prognosis
Full preoperative motion
Poor prognosis
Fixed contractures
Donor strength
Good prognosis
M4 to M5
Poor prognosis
M3 or less
Timing
Good prognosis
6 to 12 months after injury
Poor prognosis
More than 2 years (muscle fibrosis)
Sensibility
Good prognosis
Protective sensation intact
Poor prognosis
Anaesthetic hand
Factors predicting outcome
FactorGood prognosisPoor prognosis
Patient ageYounger, activeElderly, sedentary
ComplianceMotivated, follows therapyPoor attendance
Passive ROMFull preoperative motionFixed contractures
Donor strengthM4 to M5M3 or less
Timing6 to 12 months after injuryMore than 2 years (muscle fibrosis)
SensibilityProtective sensation intactAnaesthetic hand

Viva & Exam Focus


Mnemonic

OASES-SPTendon transfer principles — OASES-SP (recite first)

O
One function
One tendon per function restored
A
Adequate strength
Minimum M4 power in the donor (loses one grade)
S
Synergistic
Donor works naturally with the recipient action
E
Expendable
Loss of the donor is acceptable
S
Straight line
Direct line of pull to the insertion
S
Soft tissue
Equilibrium — no scarring, contracture or infection
P
Passive ROM
Full passive motion essential — correct contractures first

Hook:State OASES-SP before describing ANY transfer in the viva — it shows systematic thinking.

Mnemonic

FAPEOpponensplasty donor options — FAPE

F
FDS ring
Royle-Thompson — strong, good amplitude, for high demand
A
APL
Phalen-Miller — short amplitude, often needs a graft, simple
P
Palmaris longus
Camitz — for elderly, low demand only; often combined with carpal tunnel release
E
EIP
Burkhalter or Brand — the workhorse for young, active patients

Hook:FAPE — four options to restore opposition. EIP (Burkhalter/Brand) is the workhorse.

Clinical Decision Scenarios

Practise clinical reasoning and management decisions out loud

Viva scenarioStandard
Median nerve palsy — opponensplasty
Clinical prompt

“A 32-year-old mechanic presents 6 months after a laceration to the wrist that divided the median nerve. Despite primary nerve repair, he has no recovery of opposition. Examination shows thenar wasting and inability to oppose the thumb, with intact sensation. How would you manage this?”

Viva scenarioStandard
Ulnar nerve palsy — intrinsic reconstruction
Clinical prompt

“A 45-year-old with traumatic ulnar nerve division at the elbow presents 9 months post-injury with clawing of the ring and small fingers, a positive Froment's sign and interosseous wasting. EMG shows no ulnar nerve recovery. What are your management options?”

Viva scenarioStandard
Tendon transfer principles applied to opponensplasty
Clinical prompt

“What are the principles of tendon transfer? Apply them to choosing a donor for opponensplasty in median nerve palsy.”

Exam day cheat sheet
Tendon transfers — exam-day essentials

Principles (recite first)

  • OASES-SP: One function, Adequate strength (M4 min, loses one grade), Synergistic, Expendable, Straight line, Soft-tissue equilibrium, Passive ROM full
  • Confirm irreversible nerve injury with EMG/NCS at 3 to 6 months; do not wait beyond 12 months

Median palsy

  • Low median = lost opposition only; high median also loses FPL, FDP index/middle, pronation
  • Workhorse = Brand or Burkhalter EIP opponensplasty (synergistic, expendable, 5 cm excursion, 85 to 95 percent success)
  • Tension to the BASE of the small finger, wrist neutral — not the tip
  • Donor options: FAPE (FDS ring, APL, PL, EIP)

Ulnar palsy

  • Low ulnar = clawing ring/small plus Froment's (weak adductor) plus weak grip
  • High ulnar also loses FDP ring/small — paradoxically LESS clawing (ulnar paradox)
  • Zancolli lasso: FDP around A1, tension MCP 70 degrees (not 90), loses 10 to 20 degrees of DIP flexion
  • FDS four-tail (modified Stiles-Bunnell): physiological, active IP extension, no DIP loss, for the young/high demand
  • Adductor reconstruction: release the first-web contracture first, then EIP or ECRL to adductor

Technique essentials

  • Pulvertaft weave: 3 to 6 passes, non-absorbable 3-0 suture, withstands more than 250 N
  • Tensioning is the critical step — too tight (swan-neck or contracture) or too loose (weak) fails
  • Immobilise 3 weeks — the sweet spot (earlier ruptures, later adhesions)
  • Final outcome 3 to 6 months; expect M3 to M4 strength, never normal

Anatomical danger zones

  • PIN: deep to supinator — stay superficial freeing EIP proximally
  • Dorsal sensory branch of ulnar nerve: crosses the ulnar-border routing tunnel — protect it
  • Superficial radial nerve: at the EIP harvest incision — identify and retract
  • Ulnar digital nerve to small finger: at risk in the Zancolli lasso — use Bruner incisions, retract radially
  • A2 and A4 pulleys: preserve (release only A1 for the lasso) to avoid bowstringing

Exam-day traps

  • Do not skip the principles — state OASES-SP first
  • Do not confuse EIP and EDC — EIP is ulnar to EDC; confirm independent index extension before cutting
  • Do not over-tension — causes swan-neck (intrinsic) or inability to adduct (opponensplasty)
  • Do not forget the first-web release in ulnar palsy
  • Do not tension the Zancolli lasso to 90 degrees — use 70
  • Do not mobilise before 3 weeks — juncture rupture risk

Background & Evidence


The nerve-palsy patterns. The lesion level dictates the deficit and therefore the transfer plan:

Low median
Deficit
Lost opposition only (APB)
Reconstruction
Opponensplasty alone — EIP workhorse
High median
Deficit
Opposition plus FPL and FDP index/middle, pronation
Reconstruction
Staged: EIP opponensplasty, brachioradialis-to-FPL, FDP side-to-side
Low ulnar
Deficit
Clawing ring/small plus Froment's plus weak grip
Reconstruction
Zancolli lasso or FDS four-tail plus adductor reconstruction
High ulnar
Deficit
All the above plus FDP ring/small (less clawing — ulnar paradox)
Reconstruction
FDP side-to-side tenodesis first, then intrinsic and adductor work
Combined median and ulnar
Deficit
Both patterns
Reconstruction
Staged reconstruction around what remains expendable
Nerve palsy types — deficit and reconstruction
TypeDeficitReconstruction
Low medianLost opposition only (APB)Opponensplasty alone — EIP workhorse
High medianOpposition plus FPL and FDP index/middle, pronationStaged: EIP opponensplasty, brachioradialis-to-FPL, FDP side-to-side
Low ulnarClawing ring/small plus Froment's plus weak gripZancolli lasso or FDS four-tail plus adductor reconstruction
High ulnarAll the above plus FDP ring/small (less clawing — ulnar paradox)FDP side-to-side tenodesis first, then intrinsic and adductor work
Combined median and ulnarBoth patternsStaged reconstruction around what remains expendable

Pathoanatomy and epidemiology. Tendon transfers are performed for irreversible nerve injury — most commonly sharp lacerations (wrist for median, elbow/wrist for ulnar), stretch or compression contusions, and after failed nerve repair. Median palsy flattens the thenar eminence (APB, opponens, superficial head of FPB paralysed) and the thumb comes to lie in the plane of the palm; sensation may be lost over the radial three and a half digits in a complete lesion. Ulnar palsy wastes the interossei and hypothenar eminence, paralyses the adductor pollicis and the medial two lumbricals, and — when proximal — the FDP to ring and small. Biomechanics of transfer. A transferred muscle loses about one grade of strength (M5 becomes M4) from the altered moment arm and the new vector, plus a learning curve — so an M4 donor is the functional floor. Excursion must match the recipient need:

FDS
Available excursion
About 7 cm
Suitable for
Excellent for most transfers (opponensplasty, four-tail)
EIP / EDC
Available excursion
About 5 cm
Suitable for
Good for opposition and intrinsic work
ECRL / ECRB
Available excursion
About 3 cm
Suitable for
Limited; often needs a graft for finger work
Wrist flexors (FCR, FCU)
Available excursion
About 3 cm
Suitable for
Insufficient alone for finger excursion; needs a graft
Opponensplasty requirement
Available excursion
3 to 5 cm
Suitable for
Met by EIP (5 cm) and FDS (7 cm); APL marginal
Intrinsic transfer requirement
Available excursion
2 to 3 cm
Suitable for
Met by FDS and EDC
Donor excursion versus recipient need
MotorAvailable excursionSuitable for
FDSAbout 7 cmExcellent for most transfers (opponensplasty, four-tail)
EIP / EDCAbout 5 cmGood for opposition and intrinsic work
ECRL / ECRBAbout 3 cmLimited; often needs a graft for finger work
Wrist flexors (FCR, FCU)About 3 cmInsufficient alone for finger excursion; needs a graft
Opponensplasty requirement3 to 5 cmMet by EIP (5 cm) and FDS (7 cm); APL marginal
Intrinsic transfer requirement2 to 3 cmMet by FDS and EDC
Work capacity (force times distance) cannot exceed the donor's, so a realistic goal is M3 to M4 functional strength, not normal power — set this expectation preoperatively.

The ulnar paradox

A high ulnar lesion produces LESS clawing than a low one. In a low lesion the intrinsics are paralysed but FDP to ring and small is intact, so the strong FDP pulls the IP joints into flexion and creates a severe claw. In a high lesion FDP is also paralysed, so there is no strong IP-flexion force and the claw is milder — counterintuitive but a classic exam question.

Froment's sign

Froment's sign is flexion of the thumb IP joint during key pinch — the patient substitutes FPL (median) for the paralysed adductor pollicis (ulnar) to maintain lateral pinch. It is a hallmark of ulnar nerve palsy, and restoring key pinch is often a higher functional priority than correcting the claw.

References


Evidence

Burkhalter EIP opponensplasty for isolated low median palsy

Level IV
Akram M, Farooqi FM, Shahzad ML, et al. • J Pak Med Assoc (2014)
Key Findings:
  • Prospective series of 11 patients with isolated traumatic low median nerve palsy treated with Burkhalter EIP opponensplasty (EIP harvested proximal to the extensor expansion, inserted into the distal attachment of abductor pollicis brevis)
  • 9 of 11 patients (82 percent) achieved excellent results, the remaining 2 (18 percent) good results
  • No postoperative complications recorded in this cohort
Clinical implication: The EIP transfer is an expendable, synergistic donor that reliably restores thumb opposition in isolated low median palsy. EIP is the workhorse opponensplasty donor for young, active patients worldwide.
Verify on PubMed (PMID 25989771)
Evidence

Camitz transfer and its modifications: systematic review

Level IV
Rymer B, Thomas PBM • J Hand Surg Eur Vol (2016)
Key Findings:
  • Systematic review of the Camitz procedure (palmaris longus plus a strip of palmar aponeurosis transferred to the abductor pollicis brevis insertion) for thenar wasting from severe carpal tunnel syndrome
  • Overall hand function improved in 86 to 100 percent of patients undergoing the original Camitz procedure
  • Most described modifications add or reposition a pulley to improve the opposition vector; all studies limited by small sample sizes
Clinical implication: The Camitz transfer is a simple, low-morbidity option (often combined with carpal tunnel release) but primarily restores palmar abduction rather than true opposition unless a pulley modification is used. Best reserved for elderly, low-demand patients.
Verify on PubMed (PMID 26768219)
Evidence

Three tendon transfer methods for ulnar nerve palsy

Level III
Ozkan T, Ozer K, Gulgonen A • J Hand Surg Am (2003)
Key Findings:
  • 44 patients with irreparable ulnar palsy reconstructed with FDS four-tail (n equals 24), ECRL four-tail (n equals 11), or Zancolli lasso (n equals 9)
  • Zancolli lasso and ECRL four-tail were most effective at restoring grip strength; FDS four-tail was most effective at correcting claw deformity, especially in long-standing paralysis with extensor-apparatus elongation
  • Preoperative PIP extensor lag and longer paralysis duration significantly worsened functional outcome; surgical technique alone did not determine outcome
Clinical implication: Match the technique to the deficit: prioritise the lasso or ECRL when grip strength is the goal and the FDS four-tail when claw correction dominates. Correct fixed contractures and avoid prolonged delay before reconstruction.
Verify on PubMed (PMID 12563635)
Evidence

Zancolli lasso versus modified Stiles-Bunnell (FDS four-tail): randomised trial

Level I
Chaudhuri GR, Chakraborty SS, Rai AK, et al. • Hand (N Y) (2025)
Key Findings:
  • Prospective randomised comparative trial of 50 patients with ulnar claw hand: FDS four-tail (n equals 25) versus Zancolli lasso (n equals 25)
  • Both groups improved significantly in MCP range of motion and grip strength; grip-strength recovery was higher with the Zancolli lasso (129 percent versus 117 percent, p equals 0.013)
  • Claw correction was rated excellent slightly more often after the FDS four-tail (not statistically significant); the lasso had shorter operating time and faster return to activities
Clinical implication: Neither procedure is clearly superior. The Zancolli lasso offers faster recovery and grip return, while the FDS four-tail tends to give marginally better claw correction; tailor the choice to patient demands and surgeon experience.
Verify on PubMed (PMID 40851472)

Classic and anatomical references 1. Brand PW. Biomechanics of tendon transfers. Hand Clin. 1988;4(2):137-154. doi:10.1016/s0749-0712(21)00622-3 2. Burkhalter WE. Tendon transfer principles and clinical applications in hand surgery. J Hand Surg Am. 1991;16(3):398-404. doi:10.1016/s0363-5023(10)80100-3 3. Anderson GA, Lee V, Sundararaj GD. Opponensplasty by extensor indicis and flexor digitorum superficialis tendon transfer. J Hand Surg Br. 1992;17(6):611-614. doi:10.1016/0266-7681(92)90026-e 4. Zancolli EA. Claw-hand caused by paralysis of the intrinsic muscles: a simple surgical procedure for its correction. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1957;39(5):1076-1080. 5. Omer GE Jr. Tendon transfers in combined nerve injuries. Orthop Clin North Am. 1974;5(2):377-387. 6. Riordan DC. Tendon transfers in hand surgery. J Hand Surg Am. 1983;8(5 Pt 2):748-753. doi:10.1016/s0363-5023(83)80267-0 7. Hastings H 2nd, Davidson S. Tendon transfers for ulnar nerve palsy: evaluation and preoperative management. Hand Clin. 1988;4(2):167-178. 8. Boyes JH, Stark HH. Flexor-tendon grafts in the fingers and thumb: an evaluation of end results. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1971;53(7):1332-1342. 9. Pulvertaft RG. Tendon grafts for flexor tendon injuries in the fingers and thumb: a study of technique and results. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1956;38(1):175-194. doi:10.1302/0301-620x.38b1.175 10. Smith RJ. Intrinsic muscles of the fingers: function, dysfunction, and surgical reconstruction. Instr Course Lect. 1975;24:200-220.

Editorially reviewed — transparent references and correction processPublished by OrthoVellum Medical Education TeamEditorial boardMethodologyReview policy
Educational disclosure

Educational content is reviewed for source visibility, editorial coherence, and correction readiness.

No individual clinician credential is claimed unless a named person is shown.

Verify before clinical use; this is not medical advice or a substitute for local guidance.

Procedure console
20
Read
0
Sections
intermediate
Level
Peer-reviewed · 2026-06-20
Procedure info
Level
intermediate
Read time
20
Updated
2026-06-20
Browse all procedures