Adult Reconstruction

Total Knee Arthroplasty - Cemented

Comprehensive surgical technique guide for cemented total knee arthroplasty including medial parapatellar approach, gap balancing, femoral rotation principles, and complication management - FRCS exam preparation

Core Procedure
advanced
By OrthoVellum Medical Education Team

Reviewed by OrthoVellum Editorial Team

Editorial maintenance, source checking, and correction workflow • Published by OrthoVellum Medical Education Team

High Yield Overview

TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY - CEMENTED

Medial parapatellar arthrotomy (standard), alternatives include midvastus, subvastus, lateral parapatellar for valgus knee | advanced

Critical Danger Structures

Danger 1: Popliteal Vessels

Popliteal artery and vein. Location: Posterior knee joint, 10-15mm from posterior tibial cortex at joint line level, tethered by geniculate branches. Protection: Protect with retractors during posterior tibial cut, use careful saw technique, remove posterior cement extrusion gently under direct vision or use cement restrictor, avoid hyperextension during closure (stretches artery)

Danger 2: Common Peroneal Nerve

Common peroneal nerve. Location: Wraps around fibular neck, 20-30mm distal to lateral joint line, vulnerable during valgus correction. Protection: Incremental soft tissue releases in valgus knee (avoid aggressive ITB/LCL release in single step), padding during surgery, avoid compression from hematoma or tight dressings, monitor foot dorsiflexion postoperatively

Danger 3: Medial Collateral Ligament

Medial collateral ligament - superficial and deep layers. Location: Deep layer (capsular portion) inserts at joint line, superficial layer 5-7cm distal to joint line on proximal medial tibia. Protection: Controlled incremental release of deep MCL only (pie-crusting technique), preserve superficial MCL (primary medial stabilizer), remove osteophytes first before releasing ligament, avoid over-release causing medial instability

Danger 4: Patellar Blood Supply

Patellar blood supply - lateral and medial genicular arteries forming peri-patellar ring. Location: Peri-patellar vascular anastomosis, lateral genicular artery is dominant from lateral aspect, enters at mid-lateral border. Protection: Medial arthrotomy 5-8mm medial to patellar border preserves vascular ring, avoid extensive lateral release (sequential only if needed), gentle tissue handling, maintain some fat pad for soft tissue coverage

Danger 5: Posterior Femoral Cortex

Posterior femoral cortex. Location: Posterior condyles, at risk during posterior femoral cut and box cut in PS designs. Protection: Visualize posterior cortex before cutting, protect with retractor, avoid plunging saw blade posteriorly, size femoral component correctly to avoid notching (anterior) or overhang (posterior), in PS design ensure correct box chisel depth to avoid posterior cortex perforation

Mnemonic

BALANCEDGAP-BALANCED TKA

Mnemonic

WEPT 3FEMORAL ROTATION REFERENCES

Patient Assessment and Selection

Indications

  • End-stage osteoarthritis with radiographic Kellgren-Lawrence grade 3-4, failed conservative management for 3-6 months minimum (NSAIDs, physiotherapy, activity modification, weight loss if BMI over 30, intra-articular injections with corticosteroid or hyaluronic acid)
  • Inflammatory arthritis (rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis) with severe joint destruction despite medical management with DMARDs (methotrexate, sulfasalazine) and biologics (TNF inhibitors, IL-6 inhibitors)
  • Post-traumatic arthritis following tibial plateau fracture, distal femoral fracture, or chronic ligamentous instability (ACL/PCL deficiency) with secondary degenerative changes
  • Osteonecrosis with collapse and secondary degenerative changes
  • Significant functional limitation: inability to walk more than 1-2 blocks, unable to climb stairs, night pain affecting sleep, impact on activities of daily living and quality of life
  • Patient age typically over 65 years (longer survival rates in older patients), but younger patients considered if severe symptoms and realistic expectations regarding activity level and revision risk

Contraindications

  • Absolute: Active infection (septic arthritis, osteomyelitis, cellulitis), inadequate soft tissue envelope with open wounds or active ulceration, extensor mechanism dysfunction (quadriceps rupture, patellar tendon rupture) not reconstructable, severe vascular insufficiency precluding healing
  • Relative: Age less than 50-55 years (higher revision rates, consider alternatives like HTO or UKA), severe obesity (BMI over 40, increased complications infection, thromboembolism, mechanical failure), active substance abuse or psychiatric illness limiting compliance with rehabilitation, medical comorbidities with prohibitive anaesthetic risk, neuropathic arthropathy (Charcot joint) with severe bone loss and instability

Medical Optimization

  • Glycemic control: HbA1c less than 7% (ideally less than 6.5%), defer surgery if over 8% until optimized with endocrinology input
  • Smoking cessation: minimum 4-6 weeks preoperatively, reduces wound complications and infection risk
  • Weight loss: target BMI less than 35-40, consider bariatric surgery referral if morbid obesity
  • Malnutrition screening: albumin over 35g/L, total lymphocyte count over 1500, consider nutritional supplementation if deficient
  • Dental clearance: treat active dental caries, periodontal disease (potential source bacteremia and hematogenous seeding)
  • Dermatologic assessment: treat active skin conditions (psoriasis, eczema, ulceration) before surgery
  • Cease anticoagulation and antiplatelet agents per anaesthetic guidelines (warfarin 5 days, clopidogrel 7 days, continue aspirin)

Radiographic Planning

  • Weight-bearing films essential: AP pelvis-to-ankle (mechanical axis), standing AP knee, lateral knee, skyline patella (Merchant or sunrise view)
  • Deformity analysis: Measure mechanical axis deviation (normal passes through center of knee), quantify varus/valgus deformity, assess if fixed or correctable (stress radiographs if uncertain)
  • Component sizing: Template femoral and tibial component sizes, assess canal dimensions if considering stemmed components, identify potential bone loss requiring augments
  • Specific assessments: Patellar morphology (Wiberg classification, depth of trochlear groove), patella alta or baja (Insall-Salvati ratio normal 0.8-1.2), tibial slope (normal 3-7 degrees posterior), presence of spurs or osteophytes
  • Advanced imaging: CT scan for complex deformity (assess bone stock, version), rotational alignment if prior deformity or fracture, patient-specific instrumentation if available, MRI rarely indicated unless soft tissue assessment needed

Exam Viva Scenarios

Practice these scenarios to excel in your viva examination

VIVA SCENARIOStandard

EXAMINER

"How do you determine femoral component rotation in TKA and why is this so critical? Walk me through your systematic approach."

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
Femoral component rotation is one of the most critical technical aspects of TKA. Internal rotation causes two major problems: patellar maltracking with lateral subluxation, and flexion gap asymmetry with medial tightness leading to flexion instability. I use multiple anatomic references to determine rotation and verify they agree. The first reference is the posterior condylar axis plus 3 degrees external rotation - this is simple to measure using the posterior cutting block, but it is unreliable in valgus knees where the lateral condyle is hypoplastic. The second reference is the transepicondylar axis, which I consider the most reliable - this is the line from the lateral epicondylar prominence to the medial epicondylar sulcus. The component should be parallel to this axis. The third reference is Whiteside's line, the anteroposterior axis of the trochlea drawn from the deepest point of the trochlear groove to the center of the intercondylar notch. The femoral component should be perpendicular to this line. I also use a functional reference - the flexion gap should be rectangular with equal medial and lateral tension when checked with spacer blocks at 90 degrees. If there is conflict between these references, I prioritize the epicondylar axis as it is most consistently reliable. In a valgus knee with hypoplastic lateral condyle, I do not rely on the posterior condylar axis as it will lead to excessive external rotation. I verify rotation visually before cementing and recheck after trial reduction to ensure the patella tracks centrally and the flexion gap is balanced.
VIVA SCENARIOStandard

EXAMINER

"What are the main complications of cemented TKA and how do you prevent them? Focus on the three commonest causes of revision."

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
The three commonest causes of revision after primary TKA are infection, aseptic loosening, and instability. For infection, prevention starts preoperatively with patient optimization - I ensure HbA1c is less than 7% in diabetics, smoking cessation for 4-6 weeks minimum, treat any active infections including dental caries and skin conditions, screen for MRSA and eradicate if present. Intraoperatively I use antibiotic prophylaxis per eTG guidelines with cefazolin 2g IV within 60 minutes of incision or vancomycin if MRSA risk or penicillin allergy, maintain normothermia, use meticulous sterile technique, copious pulsatile lavage with at least 3 liters ideally 6 liters of saline, and antibiotic-loaded cement in high-risk patients. Postoperatively I use sterile dressing protocols and provide antibiotic prophylaxis for invasive dental procedures for 2 years per ANZSA guidelines. For aseptic loosening, prevention requires meticulous cement technique with completely dry bone, pressurization of cement into cancellous bone to create macro-interlock, correct component alignment with tibial perpendicular to mechanical axis and femoral in 5-7 degrees valgus, correct rotation especially of the femoral component, adequate polyethylene thickness minimum 8mm, and removal of all cement debris to prevent third-body wear. For instability, prevention requires accurate gap balancing with equal rectangular flexion and extension gaps, correct femoral rotation to avoid flexion instability, appropriate polyethylene thickness from gap assessment, preservation of collateral ligaments with incremental soft tissue releases, and avoiding over-release. I also counsel patients on appropriate activity modification and weight management as high BMI and high-impact activities increase failure rates.
VIVA SCENARIOStandard

EXAMINER

"A patient has persistent patellar maltracking despite what you believe is optimal component positioning. Walk me through your systematic approach to troubleshooting and management options."

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
Patellar maltracking is frustrating but must be addressed systematically to identify and correct the cause. First, I verify that component positioning is truly optimal. The commonest cause of patellar maltracking is femoral component internal rotation, so I carefully assess femoral rotation - I check it is in 3 degrees external rotation from the posterior condylar axis or parallel to the transepicondylar axis. If there is any doubt, I obtain a CT scan to measure the rotation accurately. Next I assess tibial component rotation - it should not be internally rotated and should align with the center of the tibial tuberosity anteriorly and be centered mediolaterally. Third I assess patellar component position - it should be centered on the patella, not medialized which increases lateral subluxation risk, and the total patellar thickness bone plus component should equal native thickness or be slightly less to avoid overstuffing. If I confirm all components are correctly positioned and rotated, and the patella still maltracking, I would consider selective lateral release, but this must be sequential and cautious. I would start with just lateral retinacular release. If maltracking persists, I could release the ITB insertion at Gerdy's tubercle. I avoid extensive lateral release due to risk of patellar devascularization and fracture. If the patient has severe maltracking despite lateral release and all components are well positioned, I would consider tibial tubercle anteromedialization osteotomy - the Fulkerson procedure - which moves the tubercle anteriorly and medially to improve patellar tracking and unload the lateral facet. However, if imaging reveals component malrotation, I would address the underlying problem with revision surgery to correct the rotation rather than compensating with soft tissue releases. If femoral component is internally rotated, this is a revision case. I would not attempt to compensate with lateral release as it does not address the fundamental problem and risks devascularizing the patella.

Total Knee Arthroplasty - Cemented - Exam Summary

High-Yield Exam Summary

References

  1. Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry (AOANJRR). Hip, Knee & Shoulder Arthroplasty: 2023 Annual Report. Adelaide: AOA, 2023. Available at: https://aoanjrr.sahmri.com/annual-reports-2023

  2. Berger RA, Crossett LS, Jacobs JJ, Rubash HE. Malrotation causing patellofemoral complications after total knee arthroplasty. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. 1998;356:144-153. PMID: 9917679

  3. Dennis DA, Komistek RD, Kim RH, Sharma A. Gap balancing versus measured resection technique for total knee arthroplasty. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. 2010;468(1):102-107. PMID: 19789934

  4. Insall JN, Binazzi R, Soudry M, Mestriner LA. Total knee arthroplasty. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. 1985;(192):13-22. PMID: 3967412

  5. Kurtz SM, Lau E, Ong K, Zhao K, Kelly M, Bozic KJ. Future young patient demand for primary and revision joint replacement: national projections from 2010 to 2030. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. 2009;467(10):2606-2612. PMID: 19360453

  6. Parvizi J, Gehrke T, Chen AF. Proceedings of the International Consensus on Periprosthetic Joint Infection. Bone & Joint Journal. 2013;95-B(11):1450-1452. PMID: 24151261

  7. Ranawat CS, Flynn WF Jr, Saddler S, Hansraj KK, Maynard MJ. Long-term results of the total condylar knee arthroplasty: a 15-year survivorship study. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. 1993;(286):94-102. PMID: 8425373

  8. Therapeutic Guidelines Limited. eTG complete [digital]. Melbourne: Therapeutic Guidelines Limited; 2024. Surgical Antibiotic Prophylaxis. Available at: https://www.tg.org.au

  9. Vince KG, Abdeen A, Sugimori T. The unstable total knee arthroplasty: causes and cures. Journal of Arthroplasty. 2006;21(4 Suppl 1):44-49. PMID: 16781428

  10. Whiteside LA, Arima J. The anteroposterior axis for femoral rotational alignment in valgus total knee arthroplasty. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. 1995;(321):168-172. PMID: 7497664