Trochleoplasty for Patellar Instability

ArthroplastyAdvancedCore Procedure

Trochleoplasty for Patellar Instability

Surgical technique guide for sulcus-deepening trochleoplasty in severe high-grade trochlear dysplasia (Dejour B/D) for recurrent lateral patellar instability

High-yield overview

Sulcus-deepening osteotomy (Bereiter/Dejour) for severe high-grade trochlear dysplasia | advanced

Surgical Imaging

Critical Danger Structures and Exam Traps
Open Physis

The trap: Performing a trochleoplasty in a skeletally immature patient.

The fix: Trochleoplasty is strictly contraindicated if the distal femoral physis is open. Growth arrest and severe deformity will result. Always verify skeletal maturity before proceeding.

Chondral Necrosis

Location: The elevated osteochondral flap.

Risk: Making the flap too thin (less than 3 mm) or causing thermal necrosis with the burr will lead to cartilage death, fragmentation, and rapid severe osteoarthritis. Use copious cold irrigation and preserve subchondral bone.

Inadequate Fixation

Location: Fixation of the newly shaped trochlear flap.

Risk: Using prominent hardware or inadequate compression can lead to flap displacement or chondral damage to the patella. Use recessed absorbable sutures, anchors, or headless compression screws, ensuring they are buried below the cartilage surface.

Missing the MPFL

The trap: Performing an isolated trochleoplasty without addressing the soft tissues.

The fix: Trochleoplasty addresses the bony architecture, but the medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) is invariably incompetent in recurrent dislocators. Always combine trochleoplasty with an MPFL reconstruction to restore the medial checkrein.

Overcorrection

The trap: Creating a sulcus that is too deep.

The fix: A normal sulcus angle is around 138 degrees. Creating a groove that is too deep or non-anatomical alters patellofemoral kinematics and massively increases contact pressures, leading to early osteoarthritis.

Misjudging TT-TG or Alta

The trap: Ignoring concurrent bony malalignment.

The fix: Trochleoplasty does not correct an excessive tibial tubercle-trochlear groove (TT-TG) distance (greater than 20 mm) or severe patella alta (Caton-Deschamps greater than 1.2). These must be addressed simultaneously with a tibial tubercle osteotomy if indicated.

Mnemonic

D.Y.S.P.L.A.S.I.ADYSPLASIA — Evaluation of Patellar Instability

Mnemonic

F.L.A.PFLAP — Key Principles of Bereiter Trochleoplasty

Surgical Indications

Absolute Indications

  • Recurrent lateral patellar instability with failed prior soft-tissue stabilisation (e.g., failed MPFL reconstruction) in the presence of severe trochlear dysplasia.
  • Severe high-grade trochlear dysplasia (Dejour type B or D) with a massive supratrochlear spur (bump) that prevents the patella from engaging in early flexion.

Relative Indications

  • Primary surgical intervention for recurrent instability in a patient with Dejour B/D dysplasia where the bony deformity is so severe that isolated MPFL reconstruction is deemed guaranteed to fail.
  • J-sign in early flexion driven by the prominent trochlear bump forcing the patella laterally.

Contraindications

Absolute:

  • Open distal femoral physis (wait for skeletal maturity).
  • Established patellofemoral osteoarthritis (Outerbridge grade 3 or 4 of the patella or trochlea).
  • Isolated soft-tissue deficiency (normal trochlear morphology).

Relative:

  • Mild to moderate dysplasia (Dejour type A or C without a prominent bump) where an MPFL reconstruction alone usually suffices.
  • Stiff knee or inability to comply with postoperative rehabilitation.

Evidence for Trochleoplasty

Techniques

  • Bereiter Technique: Elevates a thin osteochondral flap (3 to 5 mm) leaving the cartilage attached proximally, creating a new V-shaped cancellous bed, and depressing the flap into the bed. Secured with transosseous sutures or anchors.
  • Dejour Technique: Elevates a thicker osteochondral block, removes underlying bone, and fixes the block back with screws. Less commonly performed today due to higher morbidity compared to the Bereiter flap technique.

Trochleoplasty vs Isolated MPFL Reconstruction


Clinical Decision Scenarios

Practise clinical reasoning and management decisions out loud

Viva scenarioAdvanced
Clinical prompt

A 19-year-old female presents with her fourth lateral patellar dislocation. Imaging demonstrates a TT-TG distance of 14 mm, a Caton-Deschamps index of 1.0, and severe Dejour type D trochlear dysplasia with a prominent supratrochlear spur. What is your surgical plan, and why would you not perform an isolated MPFL reconstruction?

Practical approach
This patient has recurrent lateral patellar instability driven by severe high-grade trochlear dysplasia (Dejour type D) with a prominent supratrochlear spur. Her alignment (TT-TG 14 mm) and patellar height (CD index 1.0) are within normal limits. **Why not isolated MPFL reconstruction**: While MPFL reconstruction is the workhorse for patellar instability, it addresses the soft-tissue checkrein. In Dejour type B or D dysplasia, the supratrochlear spur acts as a bony cam, actively levering the patella anteriorly and laterally out of the joint in terminal extension. If an MPFL reconstruction is performed in isolation against this massive bony deformity, the reconstructed graft will experience massive tensile forces and will inevitably stretch out or fail. **Surgical Plan**: I would recommend a combined Bereiter sulcus-deepening trochleoplasty and MPFL reconstruction. 1. **Trochleoplasty**: A thin (3-5 mm) osteochondral flap is elevated from the trochlea. The underlying prominent bony spur is removed with a high-speed burr under cold irrigation, and a new V-shaped sulcus is created. The flap is depressed and secured with recessed absorbable anchors. 2. **MPFL Reconstruction**: Using a hamstring autograft to restore the medial soft-tissue restraint. 3. **Assessment**: Ensure smooth patellar tracking and engagement in early flexion before closure.
Viva scenarioAdvanced
Clinical prompt

During a Bereiter trochleoplasty, you are elevating the osteochondral flap. How thick should this flap be, and what are the consequences of making it too thin or too thick? Explain the burring process.

Practical approach
**Flap Thickness**: The osteochondral flap must be between 3 and 5 mm thick. It consists of the articular cartilage and a thin sliver of subchondral bone. **Consequences of incorrect thickness**: - **Too thin (less than 3 mm)**: The subchondral bone support is lost, compromising the vascularity and mechanical integrity of the cartilage. This leads to chondral fragmentation, necrosis, and rapid-onset severe patellofemoral osteoarthritis. - **Too thick (greater than 5 mm)**: The flap becomes too rigid. When attempting to depress it into the newly created V-shaped sulcus, the flap will crack or fracture, making fixation difficult and creating a disjointed articular surface. **Burring process**: Once the flap is safely elevated and protected (leaving the proximal synovial hinge intact), a high-speed burr is used to deepen the cancellous bone bed. The goal is to remove the supratrochlear spur and create a V-shaped groove with a sulcus angle of roughly 138 to 140 degrees. **Crucially**, burring must be accompanied by continuous, copious cold saline irrigation. The heat generated by the burr can easily cause thermal necrosis of the underlying bone, which will subsequently doom the overlying osteochondral flap once it is secured. I ensure the lateral facet remains relatively proud to maintain the lateral bony buttress.
Exam day cheat sheet
Trochleoplasty — Exam Day Summary

References

Evidence

Trochleoplasty with a flexible osteochondral flap: results from an 11-year series of 214 cases

Level IV
Metcalfe AJ, Clark DA, Kemp MA, Eldridge JDBone Joint J (2017)
Clinical implication: The Bereiter flexible osteochondral flap technique achieves excellent long-term stability with low complication rates when performed by experienced surgeons.
Evidence

The Lyon's sulcus-deepening trochleoplasty in previous unsuccessful patellofemoral surgery

Level IV
Dejour D, Byn P, Ntagiopoulos PGInt Orthop (2013)
Clinical implication: Trochleoplasty effectively stabilises the patella in severe dysplasia but carries a long-term risk of degenerative changes; strict indications are necessary.
Evidence

Combined trochleoplasty and MPFL reconstruction for treatment of chronic patellofemoral instability: a prospective minimum 2-year follow-up study

Level III
Banke IJ, Kohn LM, Meidinger G, Otto A, Hensler D, Beitzel K, Imhoff AB, Schöttle PBKnee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc (2014)
Clinical implication: Always combine trochleoplasty with an MPFL reconstruction to address the essential soft-tissue lesion.
Evidence

Trochleoplasty techniques provide good clinical results in patients with trochlear dysplasia

Level III
Longo UG, Vincenzo C, Mannering N, Ciuffreda M, Salvatore G, Berton A, Denaro VKnee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc (2018)
Clinical implication: Trochleoplasty should be reserved for severe dysplasia and performed by experienced surgeons due to the significant complication profile.
Editorially reviewed — transparent references and correction processPublished by OrthoVellum Medical Education TeamEditorial boardMethodologyReview policy
Educational disclosure

Educational content is reviewed for source visibility, editorial coherence, and correction readiness.

No individual clinician credential is claimed unless a named person is shown.

Verify before clinical use; this is not medical advice or a substitute for local guidance.