Skip to main content
OrthoVellumOrthopaedic Exam Prep
Pricing
About OrthoVellum
OrthoVellum
A living orthopaedic atlas

Exam-focused orthopaedic references, a question bank, viva practice, and spaced-repetition revision β€” with every clinical claim traceable to its source. Content is educational only and is not a substitute for local supervision, clinical judgement, or institutional policy.


Library

  • Clinical Topics
  • Blog
  • Exam Frequency Index
  • Site Updates
  • Content Methodology

Company

  • About Us
  • Authors & Disclosure
  • Editorial Team
  • Editorial Policy
  • Advertising Policy

Legal

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Medical Disclaimer
  • Copyright & DMCA

Support

  • Support OrthoVellum
  • Help Center
  • Contact
  • Accessibility
Evidence. Clarity. Practice.

Β© 2026 OrthoVellum. For educational purposes only.

Not medical advice. Verify clinically important information against current local guidance.

Trochleoplasty for Patellar Instability

Operative SurgerySports Medicine
Sports MedicineAdvancedCore Procedure

Trochleoplasty for Patellar Instability

Surgical technique guide for sulcus-deepening trochleoplasty in severe high-grade trochlear dysplasia (Dejour B/D) for recurrent lateral patellar instability

Procedure console
20 min
Read
0
Sections
advanced
Level
Peer-reviewed Β· 2026-06-20
High-yield overview

Sulcus-deepening osteotomy (Bereiter/Dejour) for severe high-grade trochlear dysplasia | advanced

kneeSubspecialty
12Key steps
4Danger zones
90 minTypical duration
Critical Must-Knows
  • Trochleoplasty is reserved for severe high-grade trochlear dysplasia (Dejour type B or D) with a prominent supratrochlear spur and crossing sign, causing recurrent lateral patellar instability where soft-tissue reconstruction alone (MPFL) will predictably fail.
  • Sulcus-deepening trochleoplasty techniques include the Bereiter (thin osteochondral flap) and the Dejour (thick flap). Both aim to recreate a normal central sulcus and eliminate the proximal prominence, allowing the patella to engage smoothly in early flexion.
  • Almost always combined with an MPFL reconstruction to address the essential soft-tissue lesion, and potentially a tibial tubercle osteotomy if patella alta or an excessive TT-TG distance is present.
  • Technically demanding with a steep learning curve and significant risks including chondral necrosis, patellofemoral arthritis, arthrofibrosis, and overcorrection. It should not be performed for routine patellar instability.
Clinical Pearls
  • β€œ
    Look for the 'crossing sign' on a true lateral radiograph: the trochlear groove line crosses the anterior border of the condyles, indicating the groove is flat or convex at that level.
  • β€œ
    The supratrochlear spur (bump) is the pathological hallmark of Dejour B and D dysplasia. It forces the patella anteriorly out of the joint in extension.
  • β€œ
    Never perform a trochleoplasty in an open physis. Wait until skeletal maturity.
  • β€œ
    The most devastating complication is osteochondral flap necrosis due to excessive thinning or thermal injury during burring. Copious irrigation is mandatory.

When & Why


Indication. Symptomatic recurrent lateral patellar instability with severe high-grade trochlear dysplasia (Dejour type B or D) β€” a prominent supratrochlear spur with a crossing sign β€” in a skeletally mature patient, where an isolated soft-tissue reconstruction (MPFL) is predicted to fail because the bony deformity will overload the graft. Trochleoplasty is a salvage of anatomy, not a first-line stabiliser: routine instability with normal or mild dysplasia is managed by MPFL reconstruction alone. Absolute indications

  • Recurrent lateral patellar instability with failed prior soft-tissue stabilisation (for example a failed MPFL reconstruction) in the presence of severe trochlear dysplasia.
  • Severe high-grade trochlear dysplasia (Dejour B or D) with a massive supratrochlear spur that prevents the patella from engaging in early flexion. Relative indications
  • Primary surgical intervention for recurrent instability in Dejour B/D dysplasia where the bony deformity is so severe that isolated MPFL reconstruction is deemed guaranteed to fail.
  • A J-sign in early flexion driven by the prominent trochlear bump forcing the patella laterally. Contraindications.
  • Absolute: an open distal femoral physis (wait for skeletal maturity); established patellofemoral osteoarthritis (Outerbridge grade 3 or 4 of the patella or trochlea); isolated soft-tissue deficiency with normal trochlear morphology.
  • Relative: mild to moderate dysplasia (Dejour A or C without a prominent bump) where MPFL reconstruction alone usually suffices; a stiff knee or inability to comply with postoperative rehabilitation. The one decision that matters. A trochleoplasty creates a groove, but it does not pull the patella into it. In Dejour B or D the supratrochlear bump acts as a bony cam, levering the patella out in terminal extension; soft-tissue reconstruction alone cannot overcome this and the graft stretches and fails. The choice is therefore between an isolated MPFL (wrong in severe dysplasia) and a combined bony plus soft-tissue reconstruction:
Primary indication
Isolated MPFL reconstruction
Normal or mild dysplasia
Trochleoplasty + MPFL
Severe dysplasia (Dejour B or D)
Morbidity
Isolated MPFL reconstruction
Low
Trochleoplasty + MPFL
High (steep learning curve)
Risk of patellofemoral OA
Isolated MPFL reconstruction
Low if anatomical
Trochleoplasty + MPFL
Moderate (cartilage handling)
Rehabilitation protocol
Isolated MPFL reconstruction
Standard
Trochleoplasty + MPFL
Cautious early range of motion
Failure rate in severe dysplasia
Isolated MPFL reconstruction
High (the graft stretches out)
Trochleoplasty + MPFL
Low
Trochleoplasty + MPFL versus isolated MPFL reconstruction
FeatureIsolated MPFL reconstructionTrochleoplasty + MPFL
Primary indicationNormal or mild dysplasiaSevere dysplasia (Dejour B or D)
MorbidityLowHigh (steep learning curve)
Risk of patellofemoral OALow if anatomicalModerate (cartilage handling)
Rehabilitation protocolStandardCautious early range of motion
Failure rate in severe dysplasiaHigh (the graft stretches out)Low
Read the true lateral radiograph first

The crossing sign (the trochlear groove line crossing the anterior condylar line), the supratrochlear spur, and the double contour sign together define Dejour B and D dysplasia. The bump is the lesion a trochleoplasty is designed to remove β€” if it is not there, reconsider the operation.

Consent specifically for the learning-curve risks: chondral flap necrosis and rapid patellofemoral arthritis, arthrofibrosis and the possible need for manipulation, recurrent instability, hardware irritation, and the prolonged rehabilitation with delayed return to sport (6 to 9 months). Setup. Supine on a standard operating table with a lateral post or leg holder allowing full flexion and stability; a thigh tourniquet is applied but used only if necessary. General or spinal anaesthesia with an adductor canal or femoral nerve block for postoperative analgesia. Equipment: high-speed burr, sharp straight and curved osteotomes, absorbable anchors or transosseous sutures, and fluoroscopy.

The Operation


The goal is to expose the entire trochlea, elevate a thin osteochondral flap, remove the prominent supratrochlear spur and deepen the central groove into a physiological V-shaped sulcus of about 138 degrees, then re-fix the flap recessed beneath the cartilage surface β€” almost always combined with an MPFL reconstruction, and a tibial tubercle osteotomy when alignment demands it. The exposure is laid out as the first step below (and in depth on the lateral parapatellar approach to the knee and medial parapatellar approach to the knee pages).

Femoral trochlea anatomy
The femoral trochlea β€” the groove between the condyles that a trochleoplasty deepens and reshapes to correct trochlear dysplasia and stabilise the patella.Credit: OrthoVellum surgical illustration

Operative sequence β€” Bereiter sulcus-deepening trochleoplasty

Step 1Position, approach and exposure
  • Supine, lateral post or leg holder, tourniquet inflated only if needed. Run the knee through a full arc to confirm free flexion.
  • Make a midline or lateral parapatellar skin incision and perform a lateral or medial parapatellar arthrotomy depending on the concurrent procedures planned.
  • Evert or subluxate the patella to expose the entire trochlea from the intercondylar notch to the proximal synovial reflection β€” the supratrochlear spur must be fully visible or the new sulcus will be malpositioned.
Step 2Mark the osteochondral flap
  • Using a sterile marker or electrocautery, mark the borders of the intended flap: from the intercondylar notch distally, along the margins of the medial and lateral facets, and proximal to the supratrochlear spur.
  • The mark defines the new sulcus trajectory and the lateral buttress you will preserve.
Step 3Elevate the osteochondral flap (3 to 5 mm)
  • With a sharp, thin, curved osteotome, elevate the flap from distal (at the notch) to proximal, keeping it 3 to 5 mm thick β€” articular cartilage plus a thin sliver of subchondral bone.
  • Leave the flap attached proximally through the intact periosteum and synovium to preserve its blood supply. This proximal hinge is the flap's only remaining vascularity.
Step 4Deepen the subchondral bed (burring)
  • Once the flap is elevated and protected, use a high-speed burr to deepen the exposed cancellous bed, removing the prominent supratrochlear spur entirely.
  • Create a V-shaped sulcus of about 138 to 140 degrees, keeping the lateral facet relatively proud to maintain the lateral bony buttress against lateral patellar translation.
  • Copious cold saline irrigation throughout burring is non-negotiable β€” thermal necrosis of the bone dooms the overlying cartilage flap.
Step 5Shape and depress the flap
  • If the elevated flap is too stiff to conform into the new V-shaped groove, carefully weaken it with controlled longitudinal scoring (cortico-cancellous scoring) on its undersurface, taking extreme care not to breach the cartilage.
  • Depress the flap into the newly prepared bed so it sits flush within the sulcus.
Step 6Fix the flap β€” nothing proud of the cartilage
  • Secure the flap into the sulcus with 2 to 4 absorbable suture anchors placed in the depth of the new groove, or with transosseous sutures passed through the lateral and medial condyles.
  • Pass the sutures through the flap and tie securely, pulling it down into the V-shape. Ensure no suture or anchor is proud of the cartilage surface β€” prominent fixation scores the patellar articular cartilage and causes rapid iatrogenic arthritis.
Step 7Concurrent procedures (the rule, not the exception)
  • MPFL reconstruction using a hamstring autograft or allograft to restore the medial restraint β€” a trochleoplasty is almost never performed in isolation.
  • Tibial tubercle osteotomy if the TT-TG distance is greater than 20 mm (medialisation) or if there is severe patella alta (distalisation).
Step 8Assess tracking and close
  • Run the knee through a full range of motion: the patella should engage the new trochlea smoothly in early flexion (by 20 to 30 degrees) without subluxation or abnormal tilt.
  • Lengthen a genuinely tight lateral retinaculum, but avoid routine lateral release. Close the arthrotomy securely in layers.
Flap thickness β€” the make-or-break step

A flap thinner than 3 mm loses subchondral support and risks chondral fragmentation and necrosis; a flap thicker than 5 mm is too rigid and will crack when depressed into the new sulcus. Never detach the proximal hinge β€” it carries the flap's remaining blood supply, and dividing it guarantees flap necrosis.

Cold irrigation is non-negotiable

Heat from the burr causes thermal necrosis of the subchondral bone, which in turn dooms the overlying osteochondral flap once it is fixed. Burr with continuous copious cold saline lavage, create the 138-degree V-shape, and keep the lateral facet proud to preserve the buttress.

Bury every stitch and anchor

Inadequate compression allows micromotion, non-union and flap necrosis; prominent hardware scores the patella. Use recessed absorbable anchors or headless compression screws, all countersunk below the cartilage surface.

Aftercare & Complications


Rehabilitation β€” cautious early range of motion protects the cartilage flap and prevents arthrofibrosis; weight bearing and brace weaning depend on any concurrent TTO. | Phase | Timing | Weight bearing & bracing | Motion & therapy | |-------|--------|--------------------------|------------------| | Early | 0 to 2 weeks | Weight bearing as tolerated in a hinged brace locked in extension (restricted if TTO performed) | Continuous passive motion or active-assisted ROM, usually 0 to 90 degrees; multimodal analgesia and cryotherapy | | Intermediate | 2 to 6 weeks | Progress to full weight bearing without brace as quad control returns | Progress to full ROM; isometric quads, straight-leg raises, closed-chain mini-squats; avoid open-chain extension against resistance | | Late | 6 to 12 weeks and beyond | β€” | Advance closed-chain strengthening and proprioception | | Return to sport | 6 to 9 months | β€” | Requires full ROM, no effusion, and isokinetic quad strength greater than 85 percent of the contralateral side |

Chondral necrosis / flap failure
Incidence
1 to 3 percent
Recognition
Progressive pain, crepitus, loose bodies on imaging, rapid-onset patellofemoral arthritis
Prevention and management
Prevention: flap thickness 3 to 5 mm; copious cold irrigation during burring; preserve the proximal vascular hinge. Management: chondroplasty, loose-body removal, potentially progressing to patellofemoral arthroplasty.
Arthrofibrosis / stiffness
Incidence
5 to 10 percent
Recognition
Inability to regain flexion beyond 90 degrees by 6 weeks; a globally stiff knee
Prevention and management
Prevention: early controlled passive ROM; aggressive multimodal analgesia. Management: intensive physiotherapy; manipulation under anaesthesia or arthroscopic lysis of adhesions if refractory.
Recurrent instability
Incidence
2 to 5 percent
Recognition
Recurrent subluxation or dislocation episodes post-operatively
Prevention and management
Prevention: always combine with MPFL reconstruction; address a pathological TT-TG or alta at the same sitting. Management: revision stabilisation; reassess for missed malalignment.
Patellofemoral osteoarthritis
Incidence
10 to 20 percent long-term
Recognition
Anterior knee pain, joint-space narrowing on skyline radiographs
Prevention and management
Prevention: avoid over-deepening the sulcus; secure recessed fixation; meticulous cartilage handling. Management: activity modification, injections; ultimately patellofemoral arthroplasty.
Hardware irritation
Incidence
Less than 5 percent
Recognition
Pain localised to the MPFL femoral origin or the tibial tubercle (if TTO performed)
Prevention and management
Prevention: countersink screws and avoid bulky knots. Management: hardware removal after bony union is complete (minimum 6 to 9 months).
Complications β€” recognition, prevention, management
ComplicationIncidenceRecognitionPrevention and management
Chondral necrosis / flap failure1 to 3 percentProgressive pain, crepitus, loose bodies on imaging, rapid-onset patellofemoral arthritisPrevention: flap thickness 3 to 5 mm; copious cold irrigation during burring; preserve the proximal vascular hinge. Management: chondroplasty, loose-body removal, potentially progressing to patellofemoral arthroplasty.
Arthrofibrosis / stiffness5 to 10 percentInability to regain flexion beyond 90 degrees by 6 weeks; a globally stiff kneePrevention: early controlled passive ROM; aggressive multimodal analgesia. Management: intensive physiotherapy; manipulation under anaesthesia or arthroscopic lysis of adhesions if refractory.
Recurrent instability2 to 5 percentRecurrent subluxation or dislocation episodes post-operativelyPrevention: always combine with MPFL reconstruction; address a pathological TT-TG or alta at the same sitting. Management: revision stabilisation; reassess for missed malalignment.
Patellofemoral osteoarthritis10 to 20 percent long-termAnterior knee pain, joint-space narrowing on skyline radiographsPrevention: avoid over-deepening the sulcus; secure recessed fixation; meticulous cartilage handling. Management: activity modification, injections; ultimately patellofemoral arthroplasty.
Hardware irritationLess than 5 percentPain localised to the MPFL femoral origin or the tibial tubercle (if TTO performed)Prevention: countersink screws and avoid bulky knots. Management: hardware removal after bony union is complete (minimum 6 to 9 months).

The bump and the J-sign. In Dejour B and D dysplasia the massive supratrochlear bump actively pushes the patella anteriorly and laterally out of the groove as the knee reaches full extension, producing a severe J-sign (lateral deviation of the patella in terminal extension). Soft-tissue reconstruction alone cannot overcome this bony lever; trochleoplasty removes the bump and eliminates the mechanical cam. Concomitant procedures are the rule. A trochleoplasty makes a groove but does not pull the patella into it. The MPFL is the primary soft-tissue checkrein against lateral subluxation in early flexion (0 to 30 degrees) and is stretched or ruptured in chronic dislocators, so a trochleoplasty is almost universally combined with an MPFL reconstruction.

Viva & Exam Focus


Mnemonic

DYSPLASIADYSPLASIA β€” evaluating patellar instability

D
Dejour classification
A shallow, B flat with bump, C convex, D cliff pattern
Y
Young patient
Must be skeletally mature for a trochleoplasty
S
Supratrochlear spur
The bump on a true lateral radiograph
P
Patella alta
Assess with the Caton-Deschamps index
L
Ligamentous laxity
Evaluate the Beighton score
A
Alignment
TT-TG distance on CT or MRI
S
Surgical history
Failed previous soft-tissue stabilisations
I
Incompetent MPFL
Always present in recurrent dislocators
A
Arthritis
Patellofemoral OA contraindicates trochleoplasty
Mnemonic

FLAPFLAP β€” Bereiter trochleoplasty principles

F
Flap thickness
3 to 5 mm to prevent chondral necrosis
L
Lavage
Continuous cold irrigation while burring to prevent thermal injury
A
Angle of the new sulcus
Target 138 to 140 degrees
P
Protect the shape
Recessed fixation β€” absorbable sutures, anchors or buried screws
Open physis

Trochleoplasty is strictly contraindicated if the distal femoral physis is open. Performing it in a skeletally immature patient causes growth arrest and severe deformity β€” always verify skeletal maturity first.

Chondral necrosis

A flap that is too thin (less than 3 mm), or thermal injury from the burr, causes cartilage death, fragmentation and rapid severe osteoarthritis. Use copious cold irrigation and preserve the subchondral bone.

Inadequate fixation

Prominent hardware or inadequate compression causes flap displacement or patellar chondral damage. Use recessed absorbable sutures, anchors or headless compression screws, all buried below the cartilage surface.

Missing the MPFL

Trochleoplasty corrects the bony architecture but does not pull the patella into the groove. The MPFL is invariably incompetent in recurrent dislocators, so always combine with an MPFL reconstruction.

Overcorrection

A normal sulcus angle is around 138 degrees. A groove that is too deep or non-anatomical alters patellofemoral kinematics and markedly increases contact pressures, leading to early osteoarthritis.

Misjudging TT-TG or alta

Trochleoplasty does not correct an excessive TT-TG distance (greater than 20 mm) or severe patella alta (Caton-Deschamps greater than 1.2). Address these simultaneously with a tibial tubercle osteotomy when indicated.

Clinical Decision Scenarios

Practise clinical reasoning and management decisions out loud

Viva scenarioAdvanced
Clinical prompt

β€œA 19-year-old woman presents with her fourth lateral patellar dislocation. Imaging shows a TT-TG distance of 14 mm, a Caton-Deschamps index of 1.0, and severe Dejour type D trochlear dysplasia with a prominent supratrochlear spur. What is your surgical plan, and why would you not perform an isolated MPFL reconstruction?”

Viva scenarioAdvanced
Clinical prompt

β€œDuring a Bereiter trochleoplasty you are elevating the osteochondral flap. How thick should this flap be, what are the consequences of making it too thin or too thick, and explain the burring process.”

Exam day cheat sheet
Trochleoplasty β€” exam-day essentials

Key indications

  • Severe high-grade trochlear dysplasia (Dejour B or D) with recurrent instability.
  • A massive supratrochlear spur forcing the patella laterally.
  • Failed prior soft-tissue stabilisation in unrecognised dysplasia.
  • Skeletally mature patients only β€” open physis is an absolute contraindication.

Imaging findings

  • Crossing sign: the deepest groove line crosses the anterior condyles (flat trochlea).
  • Supratrochlear spur sign: a prominent proximal bump on a true lateral radiograph.
  • Double contour sign: a hypoplastic medial facet creates a second line posterior to the lateral condyle.

Surgical principles

  • Flap thickness 3 to 5 mm β€” preserves cartilage yet allows bending.
  • Leave the proximal synovial hinge attached for vascularity.
  • Burr away the bump and create a 138-degree sulcus with copious cold irrigation.
  • Recessed absorbable anchors or sutures β€” nothing proud of the cartilage.
  • Almost always combined with MPFL reconstruction; add TTO for alta or high TT-TG.

Complications and traps

  • Chondral necrosis: flap too thin (less than 3 mm) or thermal injury.
  • Flap fracture: flap too thick (greater than 5 mm).
  • Arthrofibrosis: needs early controlled active-assisted ROM.
  • Patellofemoral OA: from altered kinematics or chondral damage.
  • Trap: an isolated MPFL in Dejour D β€” the graft stretches and fails.

Background & Evidence


Normal trochlea. The normal trochlea is a concave groove on the anterior distal femur. The lateral facet is higher and more prominent than the medial, providing a bony buttress against lateral patellar translation. The normal sulcus angle is approximately 138 degrees, and the patella engages the trochlea at about 20 to 30 degrees of knee flexion. Pathological anatomy in dysplasia. Trochlear dysplasia is characterised by loss of the normal concavity and by proximal prominence. The Dejour classification grades the deformity and the associated radiographic signs, and it is the classification that drives the decision to trochleoplasty β€” types B and D, with a supratrochlear spur, are the operative targets.

A
Trochlear morphology
Shallow trochlea; sulcus angle greater than 145 degrees
Radiographic signs present
Crossing sign
B
Trochlear morphology
Flat trochlea with a prominent supratrochlear spur (bump)
Radiographic signs present
Crossing sign + supratrochlear spur sign
C
Trochlear morphology
Convex lateral facet with a hypoplastic medial facet
Radiographic signs present
Crossing sign + double contour sign
D
Trochlear morphology
Convex trochlea with a supratrochlear spur (the cliff pattern)
Radiographic signs present
Crossing sign + double contour sign + supratrochlear spur sign
Dejour classification of trochlear dysplasia
Dejour typeTrochlear morphologyRadiographic signs present
AShallow trochlea; sulcus angle greater than 145 degreesCrossing sign
BFlat trochlea with a prominent supratrochlear spur (bump)Crossing sign + supratrochlear spur sign
CConvex lateral facet with a hypoplastic medial facetCrossing sign + double contour sign
DConvex trochlea with a supratrochlear spur (the cliff pattern)Crossing sign + double contour sign + supratrochlear spur sign

Radiographic signs (true lateral radiograph).

  • Crossing sign: the deepest line of the trochlear groove crosses the anterior border of the femoral condyles, indicating the groove is flush with the condyles at that level.
  • Supratrochlear spur (bump): a bony prominence at the proximal trochlea that physically pushes the patella out of the joint in full extension.
  • Double contour sign: the anterior border of the medial condyle lies posterior to the anterior border of the lateral condyle, indicating a hypoplastic medial facet. Goal of trochleoplasty. A sulcus-deepening trochleoplasty removes the supratrochlear spur, deepens the central groove, and elevates the relative height of the lateral facet, allowing the patella to engage smoothly without being levered out by a proximal bump. The two techniques.
  • Bereiter technique: elevates a thin osteochondral flap (3 to 5 mm) leaving the cartilage attached proximally, creates a new V-shaped cancellous bed, and depresses the flap into the bed, secured with transosseous sutures or anchors. This is the dominant contemporary technique.
  • Dejour technique: elevates a thicker osteochondral block, removes the underlying bone, and fixes the block back with screws. Less commonly performed today owing to higher morbidity than the Bereiter flap technique. Key evidence. The largest reported series β€” Metcalfe and colleagues' 11-year experience of 214 Bereiter trochleoplasties β€” showed a very low redislocation rate (0.5 percent) and good long-term clinical outcomes, validating the thin osteochondral flap technique. Dejour's Lyon sulcus-deepening trochleoplasty, reported in patients with failed prior surgery, achieved excellent prevention of recurrent dislocation but carried a long-term risk of progressive patellofemoral osteoarthritis. Banke and colleagues' prospective minimum 2-year study of combined trochleoplasty and MPFL reconstruction reported 0 percent redislocation, confirming that isolated MPFL reconstruction in severe dysplasia leads to graft failure. Longo and colleagues' systematic review concluded the procedure is technically demanding with a steep learning curve but provides good clinical outcomes when reserved for severe dysplasia, with arthrofibrosis, chondral necrosis and progressive osteoarthritis the most significant complications β€” hence the strict indications.

References


Evidence

Trochleoplasty with a flexible osteochondral flap: results from an 11-year series of 214 cases

Level IV
Metcalfe AJ, Clark DA, Kemp MA, Eldridge JD β€’ Bone Joint J (2017)
Key Findings:
  • Largest reported series of Bereiter trochleoplasty (214 cases) with 11-year follow-up.
  • Very low redislocation rate (0.5 percent) and good clinical outcomes at long-term follow-up.
  • Validated the thin osteochondral flap technique with reproducible surgical principles.
Clinical implication: The Bereiter flexible osteochondral flap technique achieves excellent long-term stability with low complication rates when performed by experienced surgeons.
Verify on PubMed (PMID 28249974)
Evidence

The Lyon's sulcus-deepening trochleoplasty in previous unsuccessful patellofemoral surgery

Level IV
Dejour D, Byn P, Ntagiopoulos PG β€’ Int Orthop (2013)
Key Findings:
  • Long-term follow-up of patients undergoing sulcus-deepening trochleoplasty for failed prior surgery.
  • Showed excellent prevention of recurrent dislocation with the Lyon's technique.
  • Noted a risk of progressive patellofemoral osteoarthritis in long-term follow-up.
Clinical implication: Trochleoplasty effectively stabilises the patella in severe dysplasia but carries a long-term risk of degenerative change, so strict indications are necessary.
Verify on PubMed (PMID 23275080)
Evidence

Combined trochleoplasty and MPFL reconstruction for treatment of chronic patellofemoral instability: a prospective minimum 2-year follow-up study

Level III
Banke IJ, Kohn LM, Meidinger G, Otto A, Hensler D, Beitzel K, Imhoff AB, SchΓΆttle PB β€’ Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc (2014)
Key Findings:
  • Prospective study of combined trochleoplasty and MPFL reconstruction for Dejour B/D dysplasia.
  • Combined bony and soft-tissue reconstruction yielded superior stability (0 percent redislocation) versus isolated soft-tissue cohorts.
  • Confirmed that isolated MPFL reconstruction in severe dysplasia leads to graft failure.
Clinical implication: Always combine trochleoplasty with an MPFL reconstruction to address the essential soft-tissue lesion.
Verify on PubMed (PMID 23851967)
Evidence

Trochleoplasty techniques provide good clinical results in patients with trochlear dysplasia

Level III
Longo UG, Vincenzo C, Mannering N, Ciuffreda M, Salvatore G, Berton A, Denaro V β€’ Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc (2018)
Key Findings:
  • Systematic review and meta-analysis of trochleoplasty techniques for trochlear dysplasia.
  • Identified arthrofibrosis, chondral necrosis, and progressive osteoarthritis as the most significant complications.
  • Concluded the procedure is technically demanding with a steep learning curve but provides good clinical outcomes.
Clinical implication: Trochleoplasty should be reserved for severe dysplasia and performed by experienced surgeons due to the significant complication profile.
Verify on PubMed (PMID 28567511)
Editorially reviewed β€” transparent references and correction processPublished by OrthoVellum Medical Education TeamEditorial boardMethodologyReview policy
Educational disclosure

Educational content is reviewed for source visibility, editorial coherence, and correction readiness.

No individual clinician credential is claimed unless a named person is shown.

Verify before clinical use; this is not medical advice or a substitute for local guidance.

Procedure console
20 min
Read
0
Sections
advanced
Level
Peer-reviewed Β· 2026-06-20
Procedure info
Level
advanced
Read time
20 min
Updated
2026-06-20
SURGICAL APPROACHES USED
Lateral Parapatellar Approach to KneeMedial Parapatellar Approach to Knee
Browse all procedures