Skip to main content
OrthoVellumOrthopaedic Exam Prep
Pricing
About OrthoVellum
OrthoVellum
A living orthopaedic atlas

Exam-focused orthopaedic references, a question bank, viva practice, and spaced-repetition revision — with every clinical claim traceable to its source. Content is educational only and is not a substitute for local supervision, clinical judgement, or institutional policy.


Library

  • Clinical Topics
  • Blog
  • Site Updates
  • Content Methodology

Company

  • About Us
  • Authors & Disclosure
  • Editorial Team
  • Editorial Policy
  • Advertising Policy

Legal

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Medical Disclaimer
  • Copyright & DMCA

Support

  • Support OrthoVellum
  • Help Center
  • Contact
  • Accessibility
Evidence. Clarity. Practice.

© 2026 OrthoVellum. For educational purposes only.

Not medical advice. Verify clinically important information against current local guidance.

Two-Stage Revision TKA - Stage 1: Antibiotic Cement Spacer Insertion

Operative SurgeryArthroplasty
ArthroplastyAdvancedCore Procedure

Two-Stage Revision TKA - Stage 1: Antibiotic Cement Spacer Insertion

Comprehensive surgical technique for stage 1 two-stage revision TKA with an antibiotic cement spacer for periprosthetic knee infection and advanced orthopaedic practice

Procedure console
55 min
Read
0
Sections
advanced
Level
Peer-reviewed · 2026-06-20
High-yield overview

Adult Reconstruction | Advanced | Knee PJI Management

75-90%Eradication rate
8-12 wksSpacer duration
AvoidTourniquet (judgement call)
90-120°Spacer ROM goal
Critical Must-Knows
  • Tourniquet use is controversial - many surgeons avoid it or release it in infected cases to improve antibiotic delivery and reduce the ischaemic burden; cite this as a judgement call, not dogma
  • An articulating spacer is the preferred default for the knee - it preserves range of motion, prevents interstage bone loss and eases the stage 2 exposure
  • Protect the extensor mechanism throughout - use a tibial tubercle osteotomy (TTO) if there is patella baja or a scarred quadriceps expansion
  • Send 5 to 6 separate tissue samples before antibiotics - three or more yielding the same organism is highly specific (the Atkins criterion)

When & Why


Indication. Stage 1 of a two-stage exchange for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) of the knee. The operation removes the infected implants and all cement, performs a radical debridement, and inserts an antibiotic-loaded cement spacer that delivers high local antibiotic levels while preserving the joint space and soft-tissue envelope for reimplantation. Two-stage exchange is the global default for chronic knee PJI. Definite indications for a two-stage strategy.

  • Chronic PJI (more than 4 weeks of symptoms) confirmed by MSIS criteria
  • Failed DAIR for an acute PJI
  • Difficult organisms: MRSA, resistant Gram-negatives, fungi, mycobacteria
  • Culture-negative PJI - two-stage is the safest approach when the organism is unknown
  • Significant bone loss requiring a staged reconstruction Choose the right strategy, not the default. The decision between DAIR, one-stage and two-stage exchange depends on symptom duration, the organism, the soft-tissue envelope, the bone stock and the patient:
DAIR

For acute infection (less than 3 to 4 weeks of symptoms, or less than 6 weeks post-op) with stable well-fixed implants, healthy soft tissues, a known sensitive organism and a fit patient.

One-stage exchange

Consider only with a known sensitive organism pre-operatively, a healthy soft-tissue envelope, good bone stock, a non-immunocompromised patient and an experienced high-volume centre running strict protocols.

Two-stage exchange

The default for chronic or resistant infection, culture-negative PJI, poor soft tissues or significant bone loss. Stage 1 (this operation) and then reimplantation after an antibiotic holiday.

Pre-operative workup. Confirm the infection and plan the exposure before the incision.

  • Aspiration (off antibiotics for at least 2 weeks): cell count (WBC greater than 3000 and PMN greater than 80 percent supports PJI), Gram stain, culture (aerobic, anaerobic, fungal, AFB with a prolonged 14-day incubation), and alpha-defensin - a high-accuracy synovial biomarker and a useful adjunct when the diagnosis is uncertain or the patient is already on antibiotics. Add crystal analysis to exclude gout.
  • Serum markers: ESR greater than 30 and CRP greater than 10 support PJI.
  • Imaging: plain radiographs for loosening, CT for bone loss, nuclear scan if still uncertain. Exposure planning - critical. Assess patellar height (patella baja signals the need for a TTO) and knee flexion (a stiff knee signals an extensile approach). Plan the strategy now: a standard medial parapatellar approach for most cases, a TTO for patella baja, severe scarring or a stiff knee, and a quadriceps snip or V-Y turndown only if exposure remains inadequate. Medical optimisation. Nutrition (albumin greater than 3.0, transferrin greater than 200, lymphocytes greater than 1500), diabetes control (HbA1c less than 8 percent), smoking cessation ideally 4 or more weeks pre-op, and anticoagulation ceased appropriately. Identify the component manufacturer and size and have the extraction equipment ready; cross-match 2 to 4 units. Consent. Counsel for persistent infection (10 to 25 percent), spacer dislocation or instability (10 to 20 percent), extensor mechanism disruption (3 to 8 percent, and devastating), stiffness (10 to 20 percent), wound complications (5 to 15 percent), vascular injury (less than 1 percent), and the possible need for arthrodesis or amputation (5 to 10 percent of two-stage cases). Set realistic expectations: stage 1 is a temporising procedure, not a definitive one - 8 to 12 weeks with a spacer in situ, protected weight bearing in a hinged brace, daily range-of-motion work, and 6 weeks of IV antibiotics via a PICC line, with a final range of motion often less than a primary TKA. Discuss the alternatives: DAIR, one-stage revision, chronic suppressive antibiotics, arthrodesis, or above-knee amputation.

The Operation


The goal is to remove the infected components and all cement, perform a radical synovectomy and debridement, lavage copiously, and insert an articulating antibiotic cement spacer that delivers high local antibiotic levels while preserving range of motion and bone stock for stage 2. The exposure - through the previous medial parapatellar incision, with a tibial tubercle osteotomy ready if the patella will not evert - is the heart of the operation and is laid out in the first steps below.

AP knee radiograph of an articulating antibiotic cement knee spacer
AP knee radiograph after stage-one removal of an infected knee replacement and insertion of an antibiotic-loaded cement spacer.Credit: OrthoVellum surgical illustration

Operative sequence

Step 1Setup & tourniquet judgement
  • Supine with a bump under the ipsilateral hip; foot of bed flexed to allow knee flexion; thigh support for stability; all bony prominences padded.
  • Tourniquet use is a judgement call. Many surgeons avoid the tourniquet (or inflate it only briefly for cementing) in the infected knee: manipulation under tourniquet may drive bacteraemia, the ischaemic interval may compromise local antibiotic delivery and stress already-poor soft tissues, and operating off-tourniquet lets you debride to bleeding tissue and judge skin perfusion for closure.
  • The trade-off is higher blood loss - have blood available and use meticulous haemostasis. State this as a reasoned judgement, not absolute dogma; the high-quality evidence is limited.
Step 2Incision & medial parapatellar arthrotomy (the exposure)
  • Use the previous incision (most often midline or medial parapatellar).
  • Medial parapatellar arthrotomy: begin about 3 cm above the superior pole of the patella, curve around the medial patella 1 cm from the tendon, and extend distally to the tibial tubercle.
  • Dissect carefully through scar tissue and preserve the extensor mechanism.
Step 3Extensile exposure - can the patella evert safely?
  • Decision point: can the patella evert and the knee flex without excessive tension?
  • Yes - proceed with the exposure.
  • No - perform a tibial tubercle osteotomy (Step 4). Never force eversion (see the safety alert below).
Step 4Tibial tubercle osteotomy (if required)
  • Indications: patella baja (patellar tendon-to-tibial plateau ratio less than 0.8), severe scarring preventing eversion, a stiff knee (less than 70 degrees flexion), or a previous quadriceps snip or V-Y turndown.
  • Technique: mark the osteotomy 6 to 8 cm long and 1 cm wide, starting at the patellar tendon insertion. Use an oscillating saw for the medial and distal cuts; create the lateral cut with an osteotome to leave a lateral periosteal hinge; elevate the tubercle fragment with the attached patellar tendon so the patella flips laterally without tension.
  • Fix at closure with bicortical screws or cables (Step 15).
Step 5Intraoperative tissue sampling (before antibiotics)
  • Hold prophylactic antibiotics until at least 5 separate tissue samples are obtained.
  • Take a minimum of 5 samples: suprapatellar pouch/synovium, medial gutter synovium, lateral gutter synovium, interface tissue around the tibial component, interface tissue around the femoral component, and any obvious purulent collection.
  • Each sample in a separate sterile container; send for aerobic, anaerobic, fungal and AFB culture with a prolonged 14-day incubation. Now give antibiotics.
Step 6Radical synovectomy & debridement
  • Remove all infected tissue - the single most important step.
  • Complete synovectomy from the suprapatellar pouch to the posterior capsule; debride both gutters; remove all granulation tissue.
  • Excise necrotic tissue to healthy bleeding margins; debride bone to fresh bleeding bone; remove all foreign material (sutures, cement debris); preserve the MCL and LCL attachments.
Step 7Tibial component removal
  • Cemented tray: identify the cement-bone interface, disrupt it with curved osteotomes, use thin flexible osteotomes under the tray, remove the tray, then meticulously remove all cement with a high-speed burr.
  • Cementless tray: curved osteotomes around the periphery, disrupt bone ingrowth progressively, avoid aggressive levering (fracture risk).
  • Remove the polyethylene insert and the tibial stem if modular.
Step 8Femoral component removal
  • Cemented: thin osteotomes at the cement-bone interface, start anteriorly and work posteriorly, curved osteotomes for the posterior condyles, remove all cement.
  • Cementless: disruption osteotomes around the periphery; specialised extraction equipment may be needed; protect the posterior cortex (avoid notching).
Step 9Complete cement removal
  • Remove all cement - any residual cement is potential treatment failure.
  • High-speed burr for adherent cement; long curettes for intramedullary cement; thin flexible osteotomes; direct visualisation from all angles.
  • Debride the canal to healthy bleeding bone; sequential reaming if needed; remove all interface membrane.
Step 10Copious pulsatile lavage
  • Minimum 9 litres of pulsatile lavage: 3 to 6 L during debridement and 3 L as a final lavage before spacer insertion.
  • Ensure lavage reaches all recesses - the posterior capsule and both gutters.
Step 11Antibiotic cement spacer fabrication
  • Standard knee formulation (80 g cement): 80 g cement (2 x 40 g; Palacos preferred for elution) plus vancomycin 6 to 8 g (Gram-positive, MRSA) plus tobramycin 4.8 g or gentamicin 4 g (Gram-negative, biofilm); maximum 10 percent antibiotic by weight.
  • Mixing: combine the antibiotic powders with the cement powder first and mix thoroughly for homogeneous distribution, then add the liquid monomer and mix to a doughy consistency; mould into spacer components.
  • Types: commercial articulating (Prostalac, Spacer-K) - standardised and reliable; hand-moulded - allows a higher antibiotic dose and custom sizing; static - only if the MCL or LCL is disrupted, there is massive bone loss, or there is extreme instability.
Step 12Tibial spacer component insertion
  • Size to the tibial plateau dimensions; create a flat articular surface for stability; insert in the doughy phase so the cement interdigitates with cancellous bone; remove excess cement before polymerisation.
  • If hand-moulding: flatten the posterior aspect for rotation control, create a slight posterior slope (3 to 5 degrees), and reinforce with a Steinmann pin if the construct is large.
Step 13Femoral spacer component insertion
  • Commercial systems: follow the manufacturer technique.
  • Hand-moulded: form the femoral condyle shape, ensure an adequate anterior flange (for patella tracking), size to the native femur, insert in the doughy phase, and check alignment in extension and flexion.
Step 14Stability & ROM assessment
  • Test stability with varus/valgus stress in extension and at 30 degrees flexion; check for laxity or dislocation tendency.
  • Test range of motion: goal 0 to 90 degrees minimum, ideally 0 to 120 degrees; check patella tracking; assess for impingement.
  • If unstable: use a thicker spacer construct, a hinged knee brace post-operatively, or consider a static spacer if the knee is grossly unstable (MCL or LCL deficient).
Step 15TTO fixation (if performed)
  • If a TTO was performed, fix it at closure: screw fixation (preferred) with 2 to 3 bicortical 4.5 mm screws, or cable fixation with 2 cerclage cables.
  • Ensure secure fixation - TTO non-union is rare but problematic.
Step 16Wound closure & immobilisation
  • Layered closure: 2 deep drains; capsule and retinaculum with a strong absorbable suture; subcutaneous layer absorbable; skin with staples or an absorbable subcuticular suture.
  • Tension-free closure is critical - skin necrosis means an exposed spacer, which means treatment failure.
  • Immobilise in a hinged knee brace set for 0 to 90 degrees, preventing hyperextension and providing stability for mobilisation; gradually increase range of motion as tolerated.
Never force patellar eversion

Never force the patella into eversion against resistance. Forced eversion risks patella fracture, patellar tendon avulsion or quadriceps rupture - a devastating complication with a poor outcome. If the patella will not evert without excessive tension, perform a tibial tubercle osteotomy rather than levering the extensor mechanism.

Posterior condyle cement and the popliteal vessels

Cement behind the posterior condyles is difficult to remove but MUST be removed - residual cement harbours bacteria. Use curved curettes, burrs and direct visualisation, and protect the popliteal vessels, which lie only 1 to 2 cm posterior to the joint. Monitor for posterior cement extrusion during spacer polymerisation.

Popliteal vessels

The popliteal artery and vein lie 1 to 2 cm posterior to the knee joint. They are at risk during posterior capsule debridement, cement removal and spacer polymerisation. Stay on bone during all posterior work and monitor cement extrusion.

Common peroneal nerve

The nerve wraps around the fibular neck laterally. It is at risk with lateral dissection, retraction and leg lengthening; a post-operative palsy presents as foot drop. Avoid excessive lateral exposure below the joint line.

Extensor mechanism

The patella, patellar tendon and quadriceps. Disruption is a functional disaster. Avoid forced eversion - use a TTO if needed. Maintain patellar thickness greater than 10 mm for stage 2 and protect the patella from burr heat.

MCL and LCL

The collaterals are essential for spacer stability. Preserve them during synovectomy; injury causes spacer instability. If disrupted, consider a static spacer or a hinged brace, and test stability before closure.

Have a defensible tourniquet position

The common teaching answer is to operate off-tourniquet (or to release it before debridement) to avoid driving bacteraemia, to maintain local antibiotic delivery, and to assess tissue perfusion for closure - but acknowledge that the evidence is limited and that surgeon practice varies. Whatever you do, be able to justify it.

Why an articulating spacer

An articulating spacer allows 90 to 120 degrees of ROM, enables interstage rehabilitation, and preserves bone stock. The Fehring (Ranawat Award) series showed unexpected interstage bone loss in static spacers but none with articulating spacers, with comparable reinfection rates and final ROM - so an articulating spacer is the preferred default for the knee.

Dilution is the solution to pollution

High-volume pulsatile lavage (a minimum of 9 litres) mechanically removes bacteria and debris and is an essential complement to mechanical debridement. Lavage throughout the debridement and again as a final wash before spacer insertion.

Aftercare & Complications


Immediate post-operative

  • Protected weight bearing with a frame or crutches.
  • DVT prophylaxis with LMWH or aspirin per protocol.
  • Drains removed when output is less than 50 mL per 24 hours.
  • IV antibiotics started post-operatively and tailored once cultures are available. Rehabilitation during the spacer period
  • Range-of-motion exercises start on post-operative day 1 - critical to prevent stiffness.
  • Goal: 90 to 120 degrees flexion and full extension; daily exercises, with CPM if available.
  • A hinged knee brace is worn during mobilisation. Antibiotic protocol
  • A minimum of 6 weeks of IV antibiotics via a PICC line, with outpatient parenteral antibiotic therapy (OPAT).
  • Organism-specific adjustment once sensitivities are available; infectious-diseases consultation is essential for complex organisms. Monitoring
  • Weekly CRP and ESR (expect an initial rise, then normalisation).
  • Clinical assessment of the wound, range of motion, pain and systemic symptoms.
  • Watch specifically for spacer dislocation, wound dehiscence and stiffness. Criteria for stage 2 (exam essential)
  1. 6 weeks of IV antibiotics completed.
  2. A 2 to 6 week antibiotic holiday.
  3. Normalised markers: CRP less than 10 and ESR less than 30 for 2 or more consecutive weeks.
  4. Knee aspiration during the holiday: WBC less than 3000, PMN less than 80 percent, negative culture.
  5. A healed wound with no drainage.
  6. The patient medically optimised.
Do not rush to stage 2

The interstage interval is typically 8 to 12 weeks. A knee aspiration during the antibiotic holiday is only about 50 percent sensitive, so clinical judgement and the trend of inflammatory markers matter as much as the aspirate. Do not reimplant until the criteria are met.

Persistent infection (10 to 25 percent)
Recognition
Non-normalising CRP/ESR, positive aspiration, ongoing symptoms
Prevention
Radical debridement, high-dose antibiotic spacer, 6 weeks IV antibiotics
Management
Repeat stage 1 (spacer exchange); consider arthrodesis or amputation if multiply failed
Spacer dislocation (10 to 20 percent)
Recognition
Sudden pain, instability, loss of ROM, visible deformity
Prevention
Appropriate sizing, preserve MCL/LCL, hinged brace, partial weight bearing
Management
Closed reduction; if recurrent, a thicker spacer or a static spacer
Extensor mechanism disruption (3 to 8 percent)
Recognition
Inability to extend the knee, palpable gap, extensor lag
Prevention
TTO if patella baja, avoid forced eversion, gentle tissue handling
Management
Immediate repair with augmentation; may need allograft; poor prognosis
Severe stiffness (10 to 20 percent)
Recognition
ROM less than 90 degrees at stage 2, difficult exposure
Prevention
Early ROM exercises, articulating spacer, physiotherapy
Management
Adhesion release at stage 2, quadriceps snip for exposure, accept limited ROM
Wound dehiscence (5 to 15 percent)
Recognition
Wound breakdown, exposed spacer, drainage
Prevention
Tension-free closure, drains, optimise nutrition and diabetes
Management
VAC therapy, gastrocnemius flap if the spacer is exposed, repeat debridement
Spacer fracture (5 to 15 percent)
Recognition
Increased pain, instability, radiographic fracture
Prevention
Maximum 10 percent antibiotic, adequate thickness, protected weight bearing
Management
Conservative if stable; spacer exchange if displaced or unstable
Vascular injury (less than 1 percent)
Recognition
Ischaemia, pallor, pulselessness, haemorrhage
Prevention
Stay on bone posteriorly, monitor cement extrusion, gentle technique
Management
Emergent vascular surgery, repair versus ligation, may need amputation
Arthrodesis or amputation (5 to 10 percent)
Recognition
Multiply failed revisions, refractory sepsis, severe bone loss
Prevention
Adequate debridement, antibiotics, proper patient selection
Management
Knee fusion with an IM nail if the extensor mechanism is intact; AKA for severe bone or soft-tissue loss
Complications - recognition, prevention and management
ComplicationRecognitionPreventionManagement
Persistent infection (10 to 25 percent)Non-normalising CRP/ESR, positive aspiration, ongoing symptomsRadical debridement, high-dose antibiotic spacer, 6 weeks IV antibioticsRepeat stage 1 (spacer exchange); consider arthrodesis or amputation if multiply failed
Spacer dislocation (10 to 20 percent)Sudden pain, instability, loss of ROM, visible deformityAppropriate sizing, preserve MCL/LCL, hinged brace, partial weight bearingClosed reduction; if recurrent, a thicker spacer or a static spacer
Extensor mechanism disruption (3 to 8 percent)Inability to extend the knee, palpable gap, extensor lagTTO if patella baja, avoid forced eversion, gentle tissue handlingImmediate repair with augmentation; may need allograft; poor prognosis
Severe stiffness (10 to 20 percent)ROM less than 90 degrees at stage 2, difficult exposureEarly ROM exercises, articulating spacer, physiotherapyAdhesion release at stage 2, quadriceps snip for exposure, accept limited ROM
Wound dehiscence (5 to 15 percent)Wound breakdown, exposed spacer, drainageTension-free closure, drains, optimise nutrition and diabetesVAC therapy, gastrocnemius flap if the spacer is exposed, repeat debridement
Spacer fracture (5 to 15 percent)Increased pain, instability, radiographic fractureMaximum 10 percent antibiotic, adequate thickness, protected weight bearingConservative if stable; spacer exchange if displaced or unstable
Vascular injury (less than 1 percent)Ischaemia, pallor, pulselessness, haemorrhageStay on bone posteriorly, monitor cement extrusion, gentle techniqueEmergent vascular surgery, repair versus ligation, may need amputation
Arthrodesis or amputation (5 to 10 percent)Multiply failed revisions, refractory sepsis, severe bone lossAdequate debridement, antibiotics, proper patient selectionKnee fusion with an IM nail if the extensor mechanism is intact; AKA for severe bone or soft-tissue loss

Viva & Exam Focus


Mnemonic

KNEEKNEE PJI Diagnosis (MSIS Criteria)

K
Kultur (culture)
Two or more positive cultures growing the same organism = a MAJOR criterion (definite PJI)
N
Notify sinus tract
A sinus tract communicating with the joint = a MAJOR criterion (definite PJI)
E
Elevated markers
ESR greater than 30, CRP greater than 10, synovial WBC greater than 3000, PMN greater than 80 percent (minor criteria)
E
Extra test
Alpha-defensin synovial biomarker - high sensitivity and specificity, useful when diagnosis is uncertain or markers are equivocal
Mnemonic

SPACERSPACER - Antibiotic Spacer Construction

S
Sized appropriately
Match the spacer to the bone dimensions for stability
P
Powder-to-powder
Mix the antibiotic powder with the cement powder FIRST
A
Articulating is standard
Static only for severe instability or massive bone loss
C
Cement
80 g total (2 x 40 g) plus 6 to 8 g vancomycin plus 4.8 g tobramycin; max 10 percent
E
Extensor mechanism
Protect it at all costs - TTO if patella baja
R
ROM goal 90 to 120 degrees
Allows mobilisation and an easier stage 2 exposure

Clinical Decision Scenarios

Practise clinical reasoning and management decisions out loud

Viva scenarioStandard
Clinical prompt

“A 72-year-old presents 18 months after TKA with knee pain, swelling and stiffness. CRP is 45 and ESR is 68. How do you manage this patient?”

Viva scenarioStandard
Clinical prompt

“During stage 1 revision for knee PJI you cannot evert the patella safely. How do you proceed?”

Viva scenarioStandard
Clinical prompt

“Why do you choose an articulating spacer rather than a static spacer for knee PJI, and when might you use a static spacer?”

Exam day cheat sheet
Two-Stage Revision TKA - Stage 1 - Exam essentials

Critical principles

  • The tourniquet is a judgement call - many operate off-tourniquet (bacteraemia or antibiotic-delivery concern); evidence is limited
  • An articulating spacer is the preferred default - it preserves bone stock and ROM (Fehring)
  • Send 5 to 6 tissue samples BEFORE antibiotics; three or more growing the same organism is highly specific (Atkins)
  • Radical debridement is the single most important factor

Antibiotic cement formula

  • 80 g cement plus 6 to 8 g vancomycin plus 4.8 g tobramycin (or 4 g gentamicin)
  • Powder-to-powder FIRST, then add liquid monomer
  • Maximum 10 percent antibiotic by weight
  • Palacos is preferred for antibiotic elution

Exposure strategy

  • Use the previous incision (usually medial parapatellar)
  • If the patella will not evert safely, perform a TTO
  • TTO: 6 to 8 cm long, 1 cm wide, lateral periosteal hinge
  • Never force eversion - extensor mechanism disruption is devastating

Stage 2 criteria

  • 6 weeks of IV antibiotics completed
  • A 2 to 6 week antibiotic holiday
  • CRP less than 10 and ESR less than 30 for 2 or more consecutive weeks
  • Aspiration: WBC less than 3000, PMN less than 80 percent, negative culture
  • Typical interval 8 to 12 weeks - do not rush

Background & Evidence


Epidemiology. Periprosthetic joint infection is one of the leading causes of TKA revision, and revision for infection carries higher re-revision and mortality than aseptic revision. The economic burden is substantial. Infection is over-represented among revision indications in every major arthroplasty registry (NJR, AOANJRR, AJRR, SHAR, NZJR), which makes reliable eradication a worldwide priority. Diagnosis - the MSIS / ICM criteria. A definite diagnosis rests on either one major criterion or four of six minor criteria. Two positive cultures of the same organism, or a sinus tract communicating with the joint, are major criteria. Elevated serum and synovial markers (ESR, CRP, synovial WBC and PMN percentage), purulence, and positive histology are minor criteria. Alpha-defensin is a high-accuracy adjunct.

Major
Criterion
Two positive cultures of the same organism
Threshold / meaning
Alone = definite PJI
Major
Criterion
Sinus tract communicating with the joint
Threshold / meaning
Alone = definite PJI
Minor
Criterion
Elevated serum markers
Threshold / meaning
ESR greater than 30, CRP greater than 10
Minor
Criterion
Elevated synovial markers
Threshold / meaning
WBC greater than 3000, PMN greater than 80 percent
Minor
Criterion
Purulence at the interface
Threshold / meaning
Intra-operative finding
Minor
Criterion
Positive histology
Threshold / meaning
Acute inflammation
Adjunct
Criterion
Alpha-defensin
Threshold / meaning
High accuracy (approx 95 to 97 percent); useful when markers are equivocal
MSIS / ICM diagnostic criteria for periprosthetic joint infection
TypeCriterionThreshold / meaning
MajorTwo positive cultures of the same organismAlone = definite PJI
MajorSinus tract communicating with the jointAlone = definite PJI
MinorElevated serum markersESR greater than 30, CRP greater than 10
MinorElevated synovial markersWBC greater than 3000, PMN greater than 80 percent
MinorPurulence at the interfaceIntra-operative finding
MinorPositive histologyAcute inflammation
AdjunctAlpha-defensinHigh accuracy (approx 95 to 97 percent); useful when markers are equivocal

Guidelines, registries and global practice.

  • IDSA (US) and MSIS / ICM (international consensus, Philadelphia): multi-sample culture before antibiotics, staged reimplantation with an antibiotic spacer for chronic PJI, and infectious-diseases co-management.
  • EBJIS (European Bone and Joint Infection Society): defines PJI on a tiered confirmed, likely or unlikely framework and increasingly supports one-stage exchange in selected patients (a known sensitive organism, good soft tissues, adequate bone stock) - a genuine point of divergence from the historically two-stage-dominant US practice.
  • BOA / UK practice: PJI is managed in a specialist bone-infection multidisciplinary team (surgeon, microbiologist, plastic surgeon), with soft-tissue cover planning integral to the pathway.
  • Antibiotic duration: the classical 6 weeks of parenteral therapy is being challenged - the OVIVA randomised trial showed oral antibiotics non-inferior to IV for bone and joint infection in appropriately selected patients, shifting global practice toward an earlier oral switch under ID guidance. Spacer type and antibiotic loading vary with local cement availability and resistance patterns; vancomycin plus an aminoglycoside is the common backbone, adjusted to local microbiology. The balance of one-stage versus two-stage varies by region and centre expertise, but two-stage remains the default for resistant or unknown organisms, poor soft tissues, or significant bone loss. Outcomes - counsel realistically. Contemporary real-world pooled data (Piuzzi and colleagues, 2025) show two-stage TKA infection eradication around 74 percent, materially below the older single-centre series that quoted closer to 90 percent, with a meaningful proportion of patients never reimplanted. Using the MSIS Outcomes tool, TKA PJI fared worse than THA PJI. This is reflected in how patients should be counselled worldwide.

References


Evidence

Prospective evaluation of criteria for microbiological diagnosis of prosthetic-joint infection at revision arthroplasty (OSIRIS Collaborative)

Level II
Atkins BL, Athanasou N, Deeks JJ, et al. • Journal of Clinical Microbiology (1998)
Key Findings:
  • 297 evaluable revisions; isolation of an indistinguishable organism from 3 or more independent specimens had sensitivity 65 percent and specificity 99.6 percent (likelihood ratio 168.6)
  • Only 65 percent of all samples from infected patients were culture-positive, reflecting low bacterial loads
  • Gram stain was poor (sensitivity 12 percent) and was recommended to be abandoned for elective revision
Clinical implication: Send 5 to 6 separate periprosthetic tissue samples before antibiotics; a definite microbiological diagnosis requires 3 or more specimens growing the same organism. This is the evidence base for the multi-sample rule in stage 1.
Verify on PubMed (PMID 9738046)
Evidence

Diagnosing periprosthetic joint infection: has the era of the biomarker arrived?

Level II
Deirmengian C, Kardos K, Kilmartin P, et al. • Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research (2014)
Key Findings:
  • Prospective diagnostic study of 95 patients (29 PJI, 66 aseptic) using the MSIS definition as reference
  • Synovial alpha-defensin (and four other biomarkers) correctly classified every patient - 100 percent sensitivity and specificity in this cohort, including patients on antibiotics or with inflammatory arthritis
  • Performance maintained in confounded patients where serum markers are unreliable
Clinical implication: Synovial alpha-defensin is a high-accuracy adjunct for diagnosing knee PJI, particularly when serum markers are equivocal or the patient is already on antibiotics. Later meta-analyses report pooled sensitivity and specificity around 95 to 97 percent.
Verify on PubMed (PMID 24590839)
Evidence

Articulating versus static spacers in revision total knee arthroplasty for sepsis (Ranawat Award)

Level III
Fehring TK, Odum S, Calton TF, Mason JB • Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research (2000)
Key Findings:
  • 25 static versus 30 articulating (tobramycin-laden) spacers for infected TKA
  • Reinfection 12 percent static versus 7 percent articulating; final ROM 98 degrees versus 105 degrees - both comparable
  • Unexpected interstage bone loss occurred in 15 of 25 static-spacer knees but in none of the articulating-spacer knees
Clinical implication: Articulating spacers facilitate reimplantation without added infection risk and prevent the interstage bone loss seen with static spacers, supporting the articulating spacer as the preferred default.
Verify on PubMed (PMID 11064968)
Evidence

Exposure in difficult total knee arthroplasty using tibial tubercle osteotomy

Level IV
Whiteside LA • Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research (1995)
Key Findings:
  • 136 TKAs (including 19 infected and repeat-infected revisions) exposed via an extended tibial tubercle and crest osteotomy
  • No non-unions in simple or infected cases when reattached with 2 to 3 wires; quadriceps function preserved in all
  • Mean 2-year ROM 93.7 degrees; complications were mainly in a diabetic Charcot patient
Clinical implication: Tibial tubercle osteotomy gives reliable extensile exposure for the stiff or scarred infected knee while protecting the extensor mechanism, supporting TTO over forced patellar eversion.
Verify on PubMed (PMID 7497683)
Evidence

Outcomes following planned two-stage exchange arthroplasty for periprosthetic joint infections: a systematic review

Level III
Piuzzi N, Yost L, Putnam W, Springer B, et al. • Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery (2025)
Key Findings:
  • 65 studies, 26,354 patients (TKA 68.6 percent); mean interstage period 141 days, with 16.9 percent never reimplanted
  • Mean infection eradication 74.2 percent and mean reinfection 15.7 percent across the cohort
  • Using the MSIS Outcomes tool, TKA PJI fared worse than THA PJI - infection control 46.0 percent versus 65.5 percent, with higher reoperation and mortality
Clinical implication: Counsel patients realistically: contemporary real-world two-stage TKA outcomes are well below the historical 90 percent figure, with substantial morbidity and a meaningful non-reimplantation rate.
Verify on PubMed (PMID 40549213)
Evidence

Diagnosis and management of prosthetic joint infection: clinical practice guidelines (IDSA)

Guideline
Osmon DR, Berbari EF, Berendt AR, et al. • Clinical Infectious Diseases (2013)
Key Findings:
  • Evidence-based guidance on DAIR, resection with staged reimplantation, one-stage exchange and amputation
  • Recommends multiple intraoperative cultures and withholding antibiotics where feasible until samples are taken
  • Supports staged reimplantation with an antibiotic-impregnated spacer plus organism-directed parenteral therapy
Clinical implication: The IDSA guideline anchors the global multidisciplinary framework for PJI: ID and surgeon co-management, multi-sample culture before antibiotics, and staged reimplantation for chronic infection.
Verify on PubMed (PMID 23223583)
Evidence

New definition for periprosthetic joint infection: from the Workgroup of the Musculoskeletal Infection Society

Guideline
Parvizi J, Zmistowski B, Berbari EF, et al. • Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research (2011)

The MSIS working definition of PJI (major and minor criteria) that underpins diagnosis worldwide and is referenced throughout the workup and staging of these patients.

Evidence

Two-stage reimplantation for infected total knee replacement

Hofmann AA, Goldberg T, Tanner AM, Kurtin SM • The Knee (2005)

A foundational series on two-stage reimplantation for infected TKA using an articulating antibiotic spacer, contributing to the articulating-spacer paradigm.

Evidence

Articulating antibiotic spacers in two-stage exchange for prosthetic knee infection

Freeman MG, Fehring TK, Odum SM, et al. • Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research (2007)

Clinical outcomes with articulating antibiotic spacers in two-stage exchange for prosthetic knee infection, supporting motion-preserving spacer use.

Evidence

Comparison of a static with a mobile spacer in total knee infection

Emerson RH, Muncie M, Tarbox TR, Higgins LL • Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research (2002)

A comparison of static and mobile (articulating) spacers in infected TKA, contributing to the evidence base on spacer selection.

Evidence

Economic burden of periprosthetic joint infection in the United States

Kurtz SM, Lau E, Watson H, Schmier JK, Parvizi J • Journal of Arthroplasty (2012)

Quantifies the substantial economic burden of PJI, underpinning the case for effective eradication strategies.

Evidence

Revision total knee arthroplasty for PJI: the positive predictive value of the preoperative workup

Diaz-Ledezma C, Higuera CA, Parvizi J • Journal of Arthroplasty (2014)

Addresses the diagnostic performance of the pre-operative workup in predicting culture results at revision for PJI.

Evidence

Oral versus intravenous antibiotics for bone and joint infection (OVIVA)

Li HK, Rombach I, Zambellas R, et al. • New England Journal of Medicine (2019)

The OVIVA randomised trial showing oral antibiotics non-inferior to intravenous therapy for bone and joint infection, shifting global practice toward an earlier oral switch under ID guidance.

Editorially reviewed — transparent references and correction processPublished by OrthoVellum Medical Education TeamEditorial boardMethodologyReview policy
Educational disclosure

Educational content is reviewed for source visibility, editorial coherence, and correction readiness.

No individual clinician credential is claimed unless a named person is shown.

Verify before clinical use; this is not medical advice or a substitute for local guidance.

Procedure console
55 min
Read
0
Sections
advanced
Level
Peer-reviewed · 2026-06-20
Procedure info
Level
advanced
Read time
55 min
Updated
2026-06-20
SURGICAL APPROACHES USED
Medial Parapatellar Approach to Knee
Browse all procedures