Skip to main content
OrthoVellumOrthopaedic Exam Prep
Pricing
About OrthoVellum
OrthoVellum
A living orthopaedic atlas

Exam-focused orthopaedic references, a question bank, viva practice, and spaced-repetition revision — with every clinical claim traceable to its source. Content is educational only and is not a substitute for local supervision, clinical judgement, or institutional policy.


Library

  • Clinical Topics
  • Blog
  • Exam Frequency Index
  • Site Updates
  • Content Methodology

Company

  • About Us
  • Authors & Disclosure
  • Editorial Team
  • Editorial Policy
  • Advertising Policy

Legal

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Medical Disclaimer
  • Copyright & DMCA

Support

  • Support OrthoVellum
  • Help Center
  • Contact
  • Accessibility
Evidence. Clarity. Practice.

© 2026 OrthoVellum. For educational purposes only.

Not medical advice. Verify clinically important information against current local guidance.

Percutaneous Vertebroplasty

Operative SurgerySpine
SpineAdvancedCore Procedure

Percutaneous Vertebroplasty

Operative technique guide for percutaneous vertebroplasty in painful osteoporotic and selected pathological vertebral compression fractures — patient selection, transpedicular approach, PMMA cement injection under continuous fluoroscopy, cement leak detection and management

Procedure console
25 min
Read
0
Sections
advanced
Level
Peer-reviewed · 2026-06-20
High-yield overview

Fluoroscopically guided transpedicular PMMA cement augmentation for refractory painful vertebral compression fractures · advanced

TranspedicularThe exposure
High-viscosity PMMAThe safety key
Cement leakThe danger
~30 minPer level
Critical Must-Knows
  • Patient selection is everything: focal fracture-level pain that correlates precisely with the level of marrow oedema on STIR MRI. Diffuse back pain or absence of oedema predicts a poor response and should prompt reconsideration of the procedure.
  • Continuous lateral fluoroscopy during cement injection is mandatory to detect early extravasation into the epidural space, foramina or venous plexus before it becomes clinically significant. AP views alone are insufficient.
  • Cement extravasation causing neural compression occurs in up to 5 percent of cases when performed without real-time monitoring; venous cement embolism to the lungs is reported in 3 to 26 percent on post-procedure CT but is usually asymptomatic.
  • Sham-controlled trials (INVEST, VERTOS IV) showed no benefit of vertebroplasty over sham at 1 to 6 months for pain or function in the overall population; benefit is seen only in carefully selected patients with acute fractures less than 6 to 8 weeks old and severe focal pain.
  • Inject high-viscosity, doughy PMMA only and stop the instant any posterior or lateral leak appears on lateral fluoro. Low-viscosity injection and chasing fill volume are the two behaviours that cause symptomatic leaks and embolism.

When & Why


Indication. A painful osteoporotic (or selected pathological) vertebral compression fracture with focal tenderness exactly at the fracture level, MRI confirmation of marrow oedema on STIR, and severe pain that has failed conservative care. Selection is the whole game — get it right and the procedure works; get it wrong and it offers no benefit over a sham injection. Absolute indications - Painful osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture with focal tenderness at the fracture level.

  • MRI confirmation of marrow oedema (hyperintensity on STIR) at the symptomatic level.
  • Failure of conservative management for more than 6 to 8 weeks with severe pain (VAS greater than 7) limiting mobilisation.
  • Selected pathological fractures (myeloma, metastasis) with focal pain and no epidural tumour mass. Relative indications - Acute fracture less than 6 weeks old with severe pain where early mobilisation is critical (hospitalised, multi-morbid patients).
  • Kummell disease — delayed vertebral collapse with an intravertebral cleft showing fluid signal on MRI.
  • Progressive height loss or kyphosis threatening respiratory function in frail patients. Absolute contraindications - Active spinal infection (discitis, osteomyelitis, epidural abscess).
  • Epidural tumour or retropulsed bone fragment causing greater than 50 percent canal compromise with neurological deficit.
  • Coagulopathy that cannot be corrected (INR greater than 1.5, platelets less than 50,000).
  • Allergy to PMMA cement components. Relative contraindications - Diffuse, non-focal back pain without a clear single-level correlate.
  • Absence of marrow oedema on STIR MRI (a chronic fracture).
  • More than three levels requiring treatment in a single session (increased cement load and leak risk).
  • Severe cardiopulmonary disease precluding prone positioning. The one decision: vertebroplasty or kyphoplasty. Both work when the patient is well selected; the long-term pain and functional outcomes are equivalent. The choice turns on whether you need height restoration and how leak-averse you must be:
Vertebroplasty

No cavity — cement fills the existing fracture lines. Faster (25 to 35 minutes a level), cheaper, but a higher leak rate (15 to 30 percent). The default for the frail elderly patient where the goal is rapid pain relief and mobilisation.

Kyphoplasty

A balloon tamp creates a controlled cavity first, giving moderate height restoration (20 to 30 percent in acute fractures) and a lower leak rate (8 to 15 percent). More expensive and slower. Chosen when height restoration matters — greater than 30 percent height loss in a younger patient.

Consent. Quantify the risks explicitly: a 10 to 20 percent risk of cement leak (most asymptomatic), a 3 to 26 percent risk of pulmonary cement embolism on CT (usually asymptomatic), a 1 to 2 percent risk of neurological deficit requiring decompression, a 10 to 20 percent adjacent-level fracture risk, and the possibility of no pain relief at all. Setup. Prone on a radiolucent table with chest and pelvic bolsters to allow gentle extension and partial fracture reduction. Local anaesthesia with sedation (midazolam, fentanyl) is standard; general anaesthesia for anxious patients or multilevel procedures. Antibiotic prophylaxis (cefazolin 2 g IV) about 30 minutes before skin. Confirm the C-arm can reach true AP and lateral projections of the target level before you prep — if you cannot see both, do not proceed.

The Operation


The goal: drive a needle safely through the pedicle into the anterior third of the collapsed vertebral body and deposit high-viscosity PMMA under continuous lateral fluoroscopy, stopping the moment any cement tracks where it should not. The exposure is fluoroscopic, not surgical — and the pedicle is both the corridor and the cage that protects the neural structures. Relevant anatomy for transpedicular access. Thoracic pedicles (T4 to T9) are narrowest in the mediolateral dimension (4 to 6 mm) and their medial wall lies closest to the dural sac. Lumbar pedicles are larger (8 to 12 mm) and more forgiving. The pedicle axis angles 10 to 15 degrees medial in the lumbar spine and 5 to 10 degrees in the thoracic. The transverse process is the posterior landmark; the superior articular facet sits immediately lateral to the entry point. Large basivertebral veins within the body drain posteriorly through the basivertebral foramen into the epidural plexus and on into the azygos system — the main conduit for venous cement embolism, and the reason viscosity control and volume discipline matter.

Illustration of percutaneous vertebroplasty cement injection
Illustration of percutaneous vertebroplasty, a transpedicular needle delivering bone cement into a collapsed vertebral body.Credit: OrthoVellum surgical illustration

Operative sequence — transpedicular vertebroplasty

Step 1Position, setup & imaging access
  • Prone on a radiolucent table; chest and pelvic bolsters allow gentle extension and partial fracture reduction. Arms tucked or abducted; head neutral in foam or Mayfield support.
  • Confirm the C-arm has unobstructed access for true AP and lateral projections of the target level before prepping.
  • Local with sedation is standard; general anaesthesia for anxious patients or multilevel work. Cefazolin 2 g IV about 30 minutes before skin.
Step 2Level confirmation & marking — the exposure begins
  • Obtain a true AP view with the vertebral endplates perfectly superimposed and the spinous process centred — this confirms correct rotation and level.
  • Mark the skin entry point 1 to 2 cm lateral to the pedicle shadow (more lateral in the thoracic spine to achieve the correct medial trajectory).
  • Cross-check the level on the lateral view and by palpating bony landmarks. Wrong-level injection is a never-event.
Step 3Skin entry & needle placement
  • Infiltrate skin, fascia and periosteum with 1 percent lidocaine.
  • On true AP the entry point is the superolateral corner of the pedicle shadow (the 10 o'clock position on the right, 2 o'clock on the left).
  • Advance an 11- or 13-gauge Jamshidi needle to engage bone.
Step 4Advance through the pedicle — the danger zone
  • Once the tip engages bone, switch to a true lateral view.
  • Advance in 2 to 3 mm increments, confirming on BOTH AP and lateral that the tip stays inside the pedicle silhouette at every step.
  • The medial wall is the critical cortex. When the tip reaches the posterior vertebral body wall on lateral, it must still be within the pedicle on AP — only then may you enter the body.
  • For a bilateral technique, repeat on the contralateral side.
Step 5Enter the vertebral body & place the working cannula
  • Advance 3 to 5 mm beyond the posterior wall into the anterior third of the vertebral body on lateral view — the safe fill zone.
  • Remove the trocar and insert the working cannula.
Step 6Prepare high-viscosity PMMA cement
  • Mix PMMA to a high-viscosity, doughy consistency — thick enough to stand in a peak on the mixing bowl (typically 4 to 6 minutes after mixing). Never inject runny cement.
  • Load into 1 mL syringes. High viscosity is the single biggest leak-prevention measure you control.
Step 7Inject cement under continuous lateral fluoroscopy — the core step
  • Under CONTINUOUS lateral fluoroscopy, inject slowly — about 0.1 to 0.2 mL per minute.
  • Watch for any posterior or lateral extravasation or venous filling. The moment you see it, STOP, leave the needle in situ 30 to 60 seconds and let the cement set to plug the leak pathway. Do not chase fill volume.
  • Typical fill: 4 to 6 mL in a lumbar vertebra, 2 to 4 mL in a thoracic vertebra.
Step 8Needle removal & closure
  • Once the cement has set (usually 8 to 12 minutes), rotate the needle 360 degrees and withdraw slowly while the cement is still soft — to avoid pulling a cement tail into the soft tissues.
  • Close the skin with adhesive strips or a single absorbable suture; apply a sterile dressing.
Step 9Immediate on-table assessment
  • Obtain a post-procedure CT (or cone-beam CT) before the patient leaves the suite to document cement distribution and detect clinically silent leaks.
  • Assess lower-limb neurology and a pain score. Admit overnight for multilevel procedures or any detected leak.
Medial
Structure at risk
Spinal canal — the cord or cauda equina
Inferior
Structure at risk
The exiting nerve root in the foramen
Lateral
Structure at risk
Segmental artery and nerve root
Anterior
Structure at risk
Aorta, vena cava or iliac vessels (especially at L4 to L5)
Pedicle breach — the structure at risk
Breach directionStructure at risk
MedialSpinal canal — the cord or cauda equina
InferiorThe exiting nerve root in the foramen
LateralSegmental artery and nerve root
AnteriorAorta, vena cava or iliac vessels (especially at L4 to L5)
Dangers at the cement-injection step

Low-viscosity cement injection dramatically increases extravasation risk. Never continue injecting after seeing posterior extravasation on fluoro in the hope of better fill — stop and let it set. Remember the anterior third of the body is the safe fill zone; posterior fill raises leak risk. And do not barrel through a multilevel case without pausing between levels to let each level's cement set.

The cement-viscosity test

Never inject cement until it is thick enough to stand in a peak on the mixing bowl. Inject under continuous lateral fluoro with your finger on the plunger, ready to stop instantly. The moment you see any posterior haze or venous filling, stop and wait 30 seconds — often the cement sets enough to plug the leak pathway. It is far better to leave the vertebra half-filled than to cause a symptomatic epidural leak.

Why parapedicular is a fallback, not a default

The transpedicular route keeps the needle inside bone right up to the body, shielding the canal. Reserve the parapedicular (extrapedicular) route for narrow upper-thoracic pedicles or when instrumentation blocks the pedicle: it passes lateral to the pedicle between the rib head and body, carrying a higher risk of pneumothorax and segmental vessel injury.

Aftercare & Complications


Immediate post-procedure protocol - Bed rest for 2 hours, then mobilise as tolerated with the physiotherapist.

  • Pain score and neurological observations every 4 hours for 24 hours.
  • Post-procedure CT before discharge or within 24 hours.
  • Analgesia: paracetamol, NSAIDs if tolerated, a short course of opioid if needed.
  • Start the osteoporosis work-up and treatment before discharge (DEXA, vitamin D, calcium, an anti-resorptive or anabolic agent). Follow-up & rehabilitation - Review at 2 weeks (wound check, pain score, mobility) and again at 6 weeks.
  • Physiotherapy: core stabilisation, posture re-education and gait training. Avoid heavy lifting and flexion for 6 to 8 weeks.
  • Standing radiographs at 6 weeks and 3 months to monitor for adjacent fracture or progressive kyphosis.
  • Long-term osteoporosis management is the single most important determinant of outcome — the procedure treats the fracture, not the underlying disease. Complications
Epidural cement leak
Recognition
Posterior cement on lateral fluoro or post-op CT; deficit if large
Prevention
High-viscosity cement, slow injection, continuous lateral fluoro, stop at any posterior haze
Management
Small and asymptomatic: observe with serial neuro checks; greater than 50 percent canal compromise or progressive deficit: urgent laminectomy and cement removal
Foraminal leak
Recognition
Immediate radicular pain or weakness in the exiting nerve root
Prevention
Stay within the pedicle; high-viscosity cement only
Management
Small: nerve-root block and observe; progressive deficit: foraminotomy and cement excision
Venous / pulmonary cement embolism
Recognition
Often silent and found on CT; symptomatic: dyspnoea, hypoxia, chest pain
Prevention
High viscosity, slow injection, watch for venous filling on fluoro, limit volume
Management
Supportive; anticoagulate a large central embolus; fatal embolism is rare but reported
Intradiscal leak
Recognition
Cement in the disc space on CT
Prevention
Often unavoidable through a fracture line
Management
No specific treatment; may accelerate adjacent disc degeneration
Adjacent-level fracture
Recognition
New focal pain at a neighbouring level, usually within 1 year
Prevention
Optimise osteoporosis therapy; counsel pre-operatively
Management
Analgesia and bracing; repeat augmentation only if selection criteria are met
Infection (discitis / osteomyelitis)
Recognition
Increasing pain and inflammatory markers 2 to 8 weeks post-op
Prevention
Strict sterile technique; treat UTI or skin infection first
Management
Biopsy, targeted antibiotics, sometimes debridement
PMMA reaction
Recognition
Transient hypotension or, rarely, anaphylaxis during injection
Prevention
Have resuscitation equipment immediately available
Management
Supportive; standard anaphylaxis management
Pedicle breach / neural injury
Recognition
New deficit during needle advancement
Prevention
True AP and lateral at every step; stay within the pedicle silhouette
Management
Urgent decompression if a deficit develops
Complications — recognition, prevention, management
ComplicationRecognitionPreventionManagement
Epidural cement leakPosterior cement on lateral fluoro or post-op CT; deficit if largeHigh-viscosity cement, slow injection, continuous lateral fluoro, stop at any posterior hazeSmall and asymptomatic: observe with serial neuro checks; greater than 50 percent canal compromise or progressive deficit: urgent laminectomy and cement removal
Foraminal leakImmediate radicular pain or weakness in the exiting nerve rootStay within the pedicle; high-viscosity cement onlySmall: nerve-root block and observe; progressive deficit: foraminotomy and cement excision
Venous / pulmonary cement embolismOften silent and found on CT; symptomatic: dyspnoea, hypoxia, chest painHigh viscosity, slow injection, watch for venous filling on fluoro, limit volumeSupportive; anticoagulate a large central embolus; fatal embolism is rare but reported
Intradiscal leakCement in the disc space on CTOften unavoidable through a fracture lineNo specific treatment; may accelerate adjacent disc degeneration
Adjacent-level fractureNew focal pain at a neighbouring level, usually within 1 yearOptimise osteoporosis therapy; counsel pre-operativelyAnalgesia and bracing; repeat augmentation only if selection criteria are met
Infection (discitis / osteomyelitis)Increasing pain and inflammatory markers 2 to 8 weeks post-opStrict sterile technique; treat UTI or skin infection firstBiopsy, targeted antibiotics, sometimes debridement
PMMA reactionTransient hypotension or, rarely, anaphylaxis during injectionHave resuscitation equipment immediately availableSupportive; standard anaphylaxis management
Pedicle breach / neural injuryNew deficit during needle advancementTrue AP and lateral at every step; stay within the pedicle silhouetteUrgent decompression if a deficit develops

Viva & Exam Focus


Mnemonic

VERTEXVERTEX — core technical principles

V
Verify patient selection
Focal pain exactly at the fracture level plus marrow oedema on STIR MRI; diffuse pain or absent oedema predicts failure
E
Entry point
Transpedicular trajectory (or parapedicular in narrow pedicles); stay within the pedicle silhouette on true AP and lateral at every step
R
Real-time lateral fluoroscopy
Continuous during cement injection — non-negotiable for detecting early posterior or venous extravasation
T
Thick high-viscosity PMMA
Inject in a doughy state, never runny; limit volume to 4 to 6 mL per lumbar level, less in thoracic
E
Exit strategy
Stop injection the moment any posterior or lateral leak appears; never chase fill volume at the expense of safety
X
X-ray (post-procedure CT)
Mandatory to document cement distribution and detect clinically silent but dangerous leaks
Mnemonic

LEAKSLEAKS — recognition and immediate response to extravasation

L
Lateral fluoro shows extravasation
Stop injection immediately and do not advance the needle further
E
Evaluate neurologically on the table
Lower-limb power, sensation, bowel and bladder; any deficit requires urgent decompression
A
AP and oblique views
Determine whether the leak is epidural, foraminal or venous; venous leaks track into the azygos system
K
Keep prone and observe
30 to 60 minutes; most small leaks are asymptomatic but need close monitoring and post-op CT
S
Surgical decompression
For progressive neurological deficit, an epidural collection greater than 50 percent canal compromise, or cauda equina syndrome

Clinical Decision Scenarios

Practise clinical reasoning and management decisions out loud

Viva scenarioAdvanced
Clinical prompt

“A 72-year-old woman with known osteoporosis has 7 weeks of severe mid-thoracic pain after a minor fall. She localises the pain precisely to T8, VAS 8 out of 10 at rest, and struggles to mobilise. STIR MRI shows marrow oedema at T8 only. Analgesia, bracing and physiotherapy have not helped. Is she a candidate for vertebroplasty, and what specific risks would you discuss?”

Viva scenarioAdvanced
Clinical prompt

“During cement injection for an L1 vertebroplasty you see, on continuous lateral fluoroscopy, a small amount of cement tracking posteriorly toward the posterior vertebral wall. The patient is awake and reports no new leg symptoms. What is your immediate response and subsequent management?”

Exam day cheat sheet
Vertebroplasty — exam-day essentials

Patient selection

  • Focal fracture-level tenderness that exactly matches the pain
  • MRI STIR marrow oedema at the symptomatic level is mandatory
  • Fracture less than 6 to 8 weeks old with VAS greater than 7 out of 10
  • Failure of conservative care for more than 6 weeks
  • Selected pathological fractures without a large epidural mass

Imaging

  • Pre-op: standing films plus MRI with STIR to confirm oedema and exclude other pathology
  • Intra-op: true AP and lateral; needle must stay within the pedicle silhouette on both
  • Continuous lateral fluoroscopy during injection is non-negotiable
  • Post-op CT within 24 hours to detect silent leaks
  • Absence of STIR oedema predicts poor response — do not proceed

Approach & trajectory

  • Transpedicular is standard; parapedicular for narrow or blocked pedicles
  • Entry point: superolateral corner of the pedicle shadow (10 o'clock right, 2 o'clock left)
  • Advance in 2 to 3 mm increments, checking AP and lateral at every step
  • Tip must reach the anterior third of the body before injection
  • Thoracic pedicles (T4 to T9) are narrowest — highest medial-breach risk

Cement injection

  • High-viscosity doughy PMMA only — low viscosity drives extravasation
  • Inject slowly (0.1 to 0.2 mL/min) under continuous lateral fluoroscopy
  • Volume: 4 to 6 mL lumbar, 2 to 4 mL thoracic; do not chase volume
  • Stop instantly at any posterior, foraminal or venous extravasation
  • Wait 30 to 60 seconds after a small leak — cement may set and seal it

Complications & aftercare

  • Cement extravasation 15 to 30 percent; symptomatic neural compression about 1 percent
  • Pulmonary embolism 3 to 26 percent on CT, symptomatic less than 1 percent
  • Adjacent-level fracture 10 to 20 percent within 1 year
  • Bed rest 2 hours then mobilise; post-op CT before discharge
  • Start osteoporosis pharmacotherapy before discharge

Background & Evidence


Epidemiology. Vertebral compression fractures are the commonest osteoporotic fracture and a leading cause of pain, kyphosis and loss of independence in older adults. Most heal or settle with conservative care; vertebroplasty is reserved for the minority that remain severely and focally painful, with imaging evidence of an unhealed fracture. Why it works. Injecting PMMA into a compressed vertebral body stabilises the fractured trabeculae and reduces the micromotion that drives mechanical pain. STIR marrow oedema is the imaging correlate of an acute, unhealed, painful fracture — its presence identifies the level that will respond, and its absence means the fracture is chronic and cement will not help. The sham-trial controversy. Vertebroplasty became controversial after the 2009 sham-controlled trials (INVEST, and the Kallmes trial) showed no benefit over a sham procedure at 1 week, 1 month and 6 months for pain or function in unselected patients, with both groups improving substantially. VERTOS IV (2018) confirmed no difference versus sham at 1 and 6 months in the overall population, though its subgroup analysis suggested possible benefit in the most acute and painful fractures. The consistent lesson is that the original trials enrolled many patients with chronic fractures and diffuse pain, diluting any treatment effect; with strict selection — acute fracture, severe focal pain, clear STIR oedema — vertebroplasty gives clinically meaningful relief. This refined indication set, not the choice between vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty, is the key determinant of outcome.

Cavity creation
Vertebroplasty
None — cement fills existing fracture lines
Kyphoplasty
Balloon tamp creates a controlled cavity
Height restoration
Vertebroplasty
Minimal (5 to 10 percent)
Kyphoplasty
Moderate (20 to 30 percent in acute fractures)
Cement leak rate
Vertebroplasty
15 to 30 percent (higher without viscosity control)
Kyphoplasty
8 to 15 percent (lower due to the cavity)
Procedure time
Vertebroplasty
25 to 35 minutes per level
Kyphoplasty
40 to 60 minutes per level
Cost
Vertebroplasty
Lower (no balloon kit)
Kyphoplasty
Higher (balloon and inflation system)
Best indication
Vertebroplasty
Acute painful VCF with oedema, frail patient, cost-sensitive setting
Kyphoplasty
Greater than 30 percent height loss, younger patient, need for height restoration
Vertebroplasty versus kyphoplasty — decision factors
ParameterVertebroplastyKyphoplasty
Cavity creationNone — cement fills existing fracture linesBalloon tamp creates a controlled cavity
Height restorationMinimal (5 to 10 percent)Moderate (20 to 30 percent in acute fractures)
Cement leak rate15 to 30 percent (higher without viscosity control)8 to 15 percent (lower due to the cavity)
Procedure time25 to 35 minutes per level40 to 60 minutes per level
CostLower (no balloon kit)Higher (balloon and inflation system)
Best indicationAcute painful VCF with oedema, frail patient, cost-sensitive settingGreater than 30 percent height loss, younger patient, need for height restoration

References


Evidence

A randomized trial of vertebroplasty for painful osteoporotic vertebral fractures

Buchbinder R, Osborne RH, Ebeling PR, et al. • N Engl J Med (2009)
Verify on PubMed (PMID 19657121)

INVEST trial: 78 patients randomised to vertebroplasty or a sham procedure. No significant difference in pain or disability scores at 1 week, 1 month or 6 months. Established the sham-controlled evidence that drove re-evaluation of patient selection criteria.

Evidence

A randomized trial of vertebroplasty for osteoporotic spinal fractures

Kallmes DF, Comstock BA, Heagerty PJ, et al. • N Engl J Med (2009)
Verify on PubMed (PMID 19657122)

78 patients; no benefit of vertebroplasty over sham at 1 month for pain or function. Both groups improved substantially, highlighting a strong placebo effect and prompting widespread re-appraisal of indications and technique.

Evidence

Vertebroplasty versus sham procedure for painful osteoporotic vertebral fractures (VERTOS IV)

Firanescu CE, de Vries J, Lodder P, et al. • BMJ (2018)
Verify on PubMed (PMID 29743284)

VERTOS IV trial: 180 patients with acute fractures less than 6 weeks old and severe pain. No difference versus sham at 1 and 6 months in the overall population; subgroup analysis suggested possible benefit in the most acute and painful fractures.

Evidence

Pulmonary cement embolism after percutaneous vertebroplasty

Choe DH, Marom EM, Ahrar K, et al. • AJR Am J Roentgenol (2004)
Verify on PubMed (PMID 15385313)

Retrospective review of patients with post-procedure CT. Pulmonary cement embolism detected in 4.6 percent on routine CT, all asymptomatic. Highlighted the need for post-procedure CT and awareness of the venous leak pathway.

Editorially reviewed — transparent references and correction processPublished by OrthoVellum Medical Education TeamEditorial boardMethodologyReview policy
Educational disclosure

Educational content is reviewed for source visibility, editorial coherence, and correction readiness.

No individual clinician credential is claimed unless a named person is shown.

Verify before clinical use; this is not medical advice or a substitute for local guidance.

Procedure console
25 min
Read
0
Sections
advanced
Level
Peer-reviewed · 2026-06-20
Procedure info
Level
advanced
Read time
25 min
Updated
2026-06-20
Browse all procedures