Skip to main content
OrthoVellumOrthopaedic Exam Prep
Pricing
About OrthoVellum
OrthoVellum
A living orthopaedic atlas

Exam-focused orthopaedic references, a question bank, viva practice, and spaced-repetition revision — with every clinical claim traceable to its source. Content is educational only and is not a substitute for local supervision, clinical judgement, or institutional policy.


Library

  • Clinical Topics
  • Blog
  • Site Updates
  • Content Methodology

Company

  • About Us
  • Authors & Disclosure
  • Editorial Team
  • Editorial Policy
  • Advertising Policy

Legal

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Medical Disclaimer
  • Copyright & DMCA

Support

  • Support OrthoVellum
  • Help Center
  • Contact
  • Accessibility
Evidence. Clarity. Practice.

© 2026 OrthoVellum. For educational purposes only.

Not medical advice. Verify clinically important information against current local guidance.

Back to Research
Level IIIHigh YieldArthroplastyProspective Cohort

Evidence brief

Ceramic-on-Ceramic THR

Alumina-on-Alumina Total Hip Replacement: A Five to Eighteen Year Prospective Study

Authors
Bizot P, Banallec L, Sedel L, Nizard R
Journal
J Bone Joint Surg Br
Year
2000

Key Findings

  • 1

    Ceramic-on-ceramic provides excellent wear characteristics

  • 2

    Wear rates 0.001-0.05 mm/year (vs 0.1-0.2mm for MoP)

  • 3

    Concerns: fracture risk (modern ceramics <0.01%), squeaking (1-5%)

  • 4

    Evolution from alumina to alumina matrix composites (BIOLOX delta)

  • 5

    No osteolysis from ceramic wear debris

Clinical Implications

Ceramic bearings offer the lowest wear rates and are particularly suitable for young, active patients. Modern ceramic composites have addressed early concerns about fracture.

Teaching Note

Know ceramic evolution: pure alumina (3rd gen) → alumina matrix composite (4th gen, BIOLOX delta). Advantages: lowest wear, biologically inert debris. Disadvantages: fracture risk (reduced in modern ceramics), squeaking, stripe wear with edge loading. Never use with titanium modular sleeves.

Citation

Bizot P et al. Alumina-on-alumina total hip replacement: a five to eighteen year prospective study. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2000;82(7):1043-1048.

PubMed

Evidence Level

III

Level III

Retrospective comparative study or case-control study

Topics

ceramicbearing surfacealuminawearsqueaking

Related Topics

  • Bearing Surfaces
  • Total Hip Arthroplasty
  • Young Patient Arthroplasty

External Links

View on PubMed

Related Papers

II

Highly Cross-Linked Polyethylene

Kurtz SM (2011)

III

TKA Alignment Debate

Howell SM (2013)

III

Dual Mobility THA

Bouchet R (2011)

III

Corail Stem Outcomes

Vidalain JP (2011)