Skip to main content
OrthoVellum
Knowledge Hub

Study

  • Topics
  • MCQs
  • ISAWE
  • Operative Surgery
  • Flashcards

Company

  • About Us
  • Editorial Policy
  • Contact
  • FAQ
  • Blog

Legal

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Medical Disclaimer
  • Copyright & DMCA
  • Refund Policy

Support

  • Help Center
  • Accessibility
  • Report an Issue
OrthoVellum

© 2026 OrthoVellum. For educational purposes only.

Not affiliated with the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.

Hemipelvectomy and Hindquarter Amputation

Back to Topics
Contents
0%

Hemipelvectomy and Hindquarter Amputation

Comprehensive surgical technique guide to hemipelvectomy - internal (limb-sparing) and external (hindquarter amputation) for pelvic sarcoma resection, Enneking-Dunham classification, vascular control, reconstruction options, flap coverage for orthopaedic fellowship exam preparation

complete
Updated: 2025-01-08
High Yield Overview

HEMIPELVECTOMY - PELVIC TUMOUR RESECTION

Internal (Limb-Sparing) vs External (Hindquarter Amputation) | Enneking-Dunham Classification | Vascular Control | Reconstruction

70-85%5-year survival pelvic sarcoma (localised)
30-50%Major complication rate
15-25%Local recurrence rate (wide margins)
60-70%Limb salvage rate for pelvic tumours

HEMIPELVECTOMY TYPES

Internal Hemipelvectomy
PatternResection of pelvic bone with limb preservation
TreatmentReconstruction vs arthrodesis vs excision arthroplasty
External Hemipelvectomy
PatternHindquarter amputation - complete limb removal
TreatmentPosterior or anterior flap closure
Extended Hemipelvectomy
PatternIncludes sacral or contralateral pubic resection
TreatmentOften requires lumbopelvic fixation

Critical Must-Knows

  • Enneking-Dunham classification defines pelvic resection zones (I-IV) - essential for surgical planning
  • Internal hemipelvectomy is limb-sparing; external (hindquarter) involves complete limb removal
  • Vascular control of common iliac vessels is critical before resection
  • Sciatic nerve sacrifice often required for posterior tumours - counsel patient preoperatively
  • Reconstruction options include endoprosthesis, allograft, saddle prosthesis, or no reconstruction

Examiner's Pearls

  • "
    Type I resection (iliac wing) often requires no formal reconstruction
  • "
    Type II resection (periacetabular) is most challenging - requires acetabular reconstruction
  • "
    Posterior flap (gluteal) is preferred for external hemipelvectomy coverage
  • "
    Mortality rate 1-5% - major blood loss is the primary intraoperative risk

Clinical Imaging

Imaging Gallery

hemipelvectomy-hindquarter imaging 1
Click to expand
Clinical imaging for hemipelvectomy-hindquarterCredit: Reddy SS et al. via World J Surg Oncol via Open-i (NIH) (CC-BY)
hemipelvectomy-hindquarter imaging 2
Click to expand
Clinical imaging for hemipelvectomy-hindquarterCredit: Reddy SS et al. via World J Surg Oncol via Open-i (NIH) (CC-BY)
hemipelvectomy-hindquarter imaging 3
Click to expand
Clinical imaging for hemipelvectomy-hindquarterCredit: Reddy SS et al. via World J Surg Oncol via Open-i (NIH) (CC-BY)
hemipelvectomy-hindquarter imaging 4
Click to expand
Clinical imaging for hemipelvectomy-hindquarterCredit: PMC5289170 via Open-i (NIH) via Open-i (NIH) (CC-BY)

Critical Hemipelvectomy Exam Points

Enneking-Dunham Classification

Type I = Iliac wing (above acetabulum). Type II = Periacetabular (most complex). Type III = Pubic rami/ischium. Type IV = Sacral ala. Know the zones and their reconstruction implications.

Vascular Control

Common iliac vessels must be controlled early in the procedure. Internal iliac artery is typically ligated. External iliac vessels are preserved in internal hemipelvectomy. Massive blood loss (5-15 units) is expected.

Nerve Considerations

Sciatic nerve sacrifice is often required for posterior tumours. Femoral nerve must be identified and protected anteriorly. Lumbosacral plexus involvement may preclude limb salvage.

Reconstruction Options

Type I: Often no reconstruction needed. Type II: Saddle prosthesis, allograft-prosthetic composite, or custom endoprosthesis. Type III: May not require reconstruction. Flail hip (excision arthroplasty) is an alternative.

Internal vs External Hemipelvectomy - Decision Guide

FeatureInternal HemipelvectomyExternal Hemipelvectomy
DefinitionPelvic bone resection with limb preservationComplete hindquarter amputation
Primary IndicationBone tumour without neurovascular bundle involvementTumour involving sciatic nerve or major vessels
Neurovascular StatusPreserved external iliac vessels and femoral nerveVessels and nerves sacrificed with specimen
Functional OutcomeAmbulatory with or without aids depending on reconstructionWheelchair or prosthetic (limited use)
ReconstructionRequired for Type II (acetabular) resectionsFlap coverage for wound closure
Mortality Risk1-3%3-5%
Major Complications30-50% (infection, flap necrosis, dislocation)20-40% (wound complications, phantom pain)
Mnemonic

PELVIS - Pelvic Resection Zones (Enneking-Dunham)

P1
Posterior ilium (Type I)
Iliac wing resection - above acetabulum, often no reconstruction needed
P2
Periacetabular (Type II)
Acetabular resection - most complex, requires reconstruction
P3
Pubic/ischial (Type III)
Anterior pelvic ring - pubic rami and ischium, minimal disability
P4
Para-sacral (Type IV)
Sacral ala resection - may extend to sacroiliac joint

Memory Hook:P1-P4: Posterior ilium, Periacetabular, Pubic, Para-sacral - following the pelvic ring from back to front

Mnemonic

FLAPS - External Hemipelvectomy Coverage

F
Posterior (Gluteal) Flap
Preferred flap - based on gluteal vessels, excellent bulk for sitting
L
Lateral position for surgery
Patient positioning allows access to both anterior and posterior pelvis
A
Anterior (Quadriceps) Flap
Alternative when posterior tissues involved by tumour
P
Primary closure goal
Tension-free closure essential to prevent dehiscence
S
Sitting surface padding
Adequate soft tissue bulk for weight-bearing on remaining pelvis

Memory Hook:FLAPS for coverage - posterior Gluteal flap is the workhorse for hindquarter amputation

Mnemonic

RECON - Type II Reconstruction Options

R
Resection arthroplasty (flail hip)
No formal reconstruction - femur suspended by soft tissues
E
Endoprosthesis (custom)
Custom pelvic endoprosthesis or modular system
C
Composite (APC)
Allograft-prosthetic composite - hemipelvis allograft with THR
O
Osteosynthesis (arthrodesis)
Iliofemoral or ischiofemoral fusion
N
No reconstruction (selected)
For elderly or low-demand patients, limb shortening accepted

Memory Hook:RECON for Type II periacetabular defects - multiple options from no reconstruction to custom prosthesis

Overview and Epidemiology

Definition

Hemipelvectomy refers to surgical resection of part or all of one hemipelvis, performed primarily for malignant bone and soft tissue tumours. The procedure is classified as:

  • Internal hemipelvectomy: Resection of pelvic bone with preservation of the ipsilateral lower limb (limb-sparing surgery)
  • External hemipelvectomy: Complete amputation through the hemipelvis, removing the entire lower extremity (hindquarter amputation)

Epidemiology

Pelvic Tumours Requiring Hemipelvectomy:

  • Primary bone sarcomas: Chondrosarcoma (most common), osteosarcoma, Ewing sarcoma
  • Soft tissue sarcomas extending to bone
  • Metastatic disease (rarely, for isolated metastasis with curative intent)
  • Aggressive benign tumours: Giant cell tumour, chordoma

Patient Demographics:

  • Bimodal age distribution: adolescents/young adults (Ewing, osteosarcoma) and older adults (chondrosarcoma)
  • Slight male predominance
  • Pelvis accounts for 10-15% of primary bone sarcomas

Historical Context

  • First hindquarter amputation: Billroth (1891)
  • Development of limb-sparing techniques: 1970s-1980s with advances in chemotherapy and imaging
  • Current limb salvage rate: 60-70% for pelvic tumours at specialised centres

Surgical Anatomy

Pelvic Zones (Enneking-Dunham Classification)

The Enneking-Dunham classification divides the pelvis into anatomical zones for surgical planning:

Type I - Iliac Wing Resection

Anatomical Boundaries:

  • Iliac wing above the acetabulum
  • From iliac crest to sciatic notch
  • Does NOT include acetabulum

Key Structures:

  • Gluteal muscles (detached)
  • Iliac vessels (preserved, retracted)
  • Sciatic nerve (usually preserved unless tumour extends posteriorly)

Reconstruction:

  • Often NO formal reconstruction required
  • Soft tissue repair of abdominal wall to remaining pelvis
  • Excellent functional outcome as hip joint preserved

Functional Outcome:

  • Near-normal gait
  • Full weight-bearing on preserved hip
  • Minimal long-term disability

Type II - Periacetabular Resection

Anatomical Boundaries:

  • Acetabulum and surrounding bone
  • May extend into ilium superiorly or pubis/ischium inferiorly
  • Subdivided into IIA, IIB, IIC based on extension

Key Structures:

  • Hip joint (sacrificed)
  • Femoral head (removed with specimen or preserved)
  • External iliac vessels (must preserve)
  • Femoral and sciatic nerves (attempt preservation)

Reconstruction Options:

  • Saddle prosthesis: Femoral component articulates with remaining ilium
  • Custom endoprosthesis: Patient-specific pelvic reconstruction
  • Allograft-prosthetic composite (APC): Hemipelvis allograft + THR
  • Iliofemoral arthrodesis: Fusion of femur to remaining ilium
  • Flail hip: No reconstruction, femur suspended by soft tissue

Functional Outcome:

  • Variable depending on reconstruction
  • Most patients ambulatory with walking aids
  • Significant limb length discrepancy expected

Type III - Pubic/Ischial Resection

Anatomical Boundaries:

  • Pubic rami (superior and inferior)
  • Ischium
  • Anterior pelvic ring

Key Structures:

  • Obturator nerve and vessels
  • Urethra and bladder (anterior)
  • Spermatic cord or round ligament

Reconstruction:

  • Usually NO formal bony reconstruction required
  • Soft tissue repair
  • Pelvic ring remains stable through posterior elements

Functional Outcome:

  • Excellent functional outcome
  • Minimal gait disturbance
  • Acetabulum and weight-bearing preserved

Type IV - Sacral Ala Resection

Anatomical Boundaries:

  • Sacral ala lateral to sacral foramina
  • Sacroiliac joint
  • May extend to sacral body

Key Structures:

  • Sacral nerve roots (S1-S3)
  • Internal iliac vessels
  • Sacroiliac joint stability

Reconstruction:

  • May require lumbopelvic fixation if significant sacral resection
  • Spinopelvic dissociation must be addressed
  • Soft tissue coverage often challenging

Functional Outcome:

  • Depends on nerve root preservation
  • S1 root sacrifice affects ankle dorsiflexion
  • S2-S4 sacrifice affects bladder/bowel function

Critical Vascular Anatomy

Arterial Supply:

  • Common iliac artery bifurcates into external and internal iliac
  • Internal iliac artery supplies pelvic viscera and gluteal region - often ligated
  • External iliac artery continues as femoral artery - MUST be preserved for limb salvage

Venous Drainage:

  • Presacral venous plexus - major source of intraoperative bleeding
  • Internal iliac veins - can be ligated
  • External iliac vein - must be preserved

Collateral Circulation:

  • Lumbar arteries provide collateral to gluteal region
  • Inferior epigastric provides pelvic wall collateral
  • Profunda femoris provides thigh collateral

Indications and Contraindications

Indications for Hemipelvectomy

Internal Hemipelvectomy (Limb-Sparing):

  • Primary bone sarcoma without neurovascular bundle involvement
  • Adequate surgical margins achievable (greater than 1cm or good response to chemotherapy)
  • Preserved external iliac vessels
  • Functional femoral and/or sciatic nerve

External Hemipelvectomy (Hindquarter Amputation):

  • Tumour involving major neurovascular bundle (sciatic nerve, external iliac vessels)
  • Extensive soft tissue involvement precluding limb salvage
  • Failed limb salvage with local recurrence
  • Severe pathological fracture with contaminated field
  • Infected tumour or uncontrolled sepsis

Contraindications

Absolute Contraindications:

  • Unresectable tumour (sacral body involvement, bilateral pelvic disease)
  • Distant metastatic disease (except for palliation)
  • Medical unfitness for major surgery
  • Patient refusal after informed consent

Relative Contraindications:

  • Contralateral limb dysfunction (amputation would leave patient non-ambulatory)
  • Advanced age with significant comorbidities
  • Poor response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (for osteosarcoma/Ewing)
  • Tumour crossing sacroiliac joint extensively

Tumour-Specific Considerations

Chondrosarcoma

Key Features:

  • Most common primary pelvic bone sarcoma
  • Chemotherapy and radiation resistant
  • Wide surgical margins essential

Surgical Principles:

  • Aim for wide margins (greater than 1cm)
  • Dedifferentiated chondrosarcoma has worse prognosis
  • No role for adjuvant chemotherapy (except dedifferentiated)

Prognosis:

  • Grade I: 90% 5-year survival
  • Grade II: 70% 5-year survival
  • Grade III: 30% 5-year survival

Osteosarcoma

Key Features:

  • Responds to neoadjuvant chemotherapy
  • Assess histological response (greater than 90% necrosis = good)
  • Often affects younger patients

Surgical Principles:

  • Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (MAP protocol)
  • Surgical timing: after 10-12 weeks chemotherapy
  • Margins can be closer with good chemo response

Prognosis:

  • Localised: 60-70% 5-year survival
  • Metastatic: 20-30% 5-year survival

Ewing Sarcoma

Key Features:

  • Chemotherapy and radiation sensitive
  • Typically affects adolescents and young adults
  • May present with systemic symptoms

Surgical Principles:

  • Neoadjuvant chemotherapy essential
  • Radiation may be used as adjunct or alternative
  • Surgery preferred when achievable with acceptable morbidity

Prognosis:

  • Localised: 60-70% 5-year survival
  • Metastatic: 20-30% 5-year survival

Preoperative Assessment

Imaging

MRI (Essential)

Sequence Protocol:

  • T1-weighted: Bone marrow extent, fat planes
  • T2/STIR: Tumour extent, oedema
  • Post-gadolinium: Vascularity, viable tumour
  • MRA: Relationship to major vessels

Key Assessment:

  • Tumour extent in bone and soft tissue
  • Relationship to neurovascular bundle
  • Skip lesions (additional foci)
  • Joint involvement

Surgical Planning:

  • Define resection margins
  • Assess neurovascular involvement
  • Plan reconstruction approach
  • 3D reformats for custom prosthesis design

MRI is mandatory for surgical planning - defines tumour extent and resectability.

CT Imaging

Indications:

  • Cortical bone destruction assessment
  • Chest CT for pulmonary staging
  • CT angiography for vascular planning
  • 3D reconstruction for surgical planning

Key Features:

  • Mineralisation pattern (chondrosarcoma shows rings/arcs)
  • Cortical breakthrough
  • Pathological fracture
  • Vascular encasement

CT Angiography

Purpose:

  • Define vascular anatomy and variants
  • Assess tumour relationship to vessels
  • Plan vascular control strategy
  • Identify collateral circulation

CT provides bone detail and is essential for staging and planning.

Bone Scan

Role:

  • Skeletal staging for metastatic disease
  • Polyostotic disease assessment
  • Less specific than PET-CT

PET-CT

Advantages:

  • Superior for soft tissue and distant staging
  • Assesses metabolic response to chemotherapy
  • Detects skip metastases

Indications:

  • Initial staging of high-grade sarcomas
  • Response assessment after neoadjuvant therapy
  • Surveillance for recurrence

PET-CT is standard for staging high-grade bone and soft tissue sarcomas.

Biopsy

Core Needle Biopsy:

  • CT or ultrasound-guided
  • Multiple cores for adequate tissue
  • Place biopsy tract to allow excision with specimen

Open Biopsy (if needed):

  • Longitudinal incision in line with definitive surgery
  • Meticulous haemostasis
  • Close in layers without drain if possible

Biopsy Principles:

  • Discuss with operating surgeon BEFORE biopsy
  • Biopsy tract must be excised en bloc with tumour
  • Avoid contaminating neurovascular structures
  • Send tissue for histology, cytogenetics, and microbiology

Staging Workup

Complete Staging:

  • Chest CT (pulmonary metastases)
  • PET-CT or bone scan
  • Bloods: FBC, UEC, LFT, LDH, ALP
  • Consider bone marrow biopsy (Ewing sarcoma)

Multidisciplinary Team:

  • Orthopaedic oncologist
  • Medical oncologist
  • Radiation oncologist
  • Radiologist
  • Pathologist
  • Reconstructive surgeon (plastic/vascular)

Surgical Technique - Internal Hemipelvectomy

Preoperative Preparation

Preoperative Planning:

  1. MDT Discussion:

    • Confirm diagnosis and staging
    • Neoadjuvant therapy completion
    • Surgical plan and reconstruction
  2. Imaging Review:

    • Define resection margins on MRI
    • CT angiography for vascular planning
    • 3D reconstruction for custom prosthesis
  3. Patient Preparation:

    • Medical optimisation
    • Blood products arranged (6-10 units RBC minimum)
    • Cell saver available
    • ICU bed confirmed
  4. Equipment:

    • Tumour resection instruments
    • Reconstruction implants (backup options)
    • Vascular instruments available
    • Nerve stimulator

Consent Discussion:

Risks to Discuss:

  • Mortality: 1-5%
  • Major blood loss: Expected 3-10L
  • Infection: 15-30%
  • Wound complications: 30-50%
  • Nerve injury: Sciatic, femoral
  • Vascular injury: May require bypass
  • DVT/PE: High risk despite prophylaxis
  • Local recurrence: 15-25%

Functional Outcomes:

  • Limb length discrepancy expected
  • Walking aids likely required
  • May require further surgery for complications
  • Prosthetic hip dislocation risk (if reconstructed)

Alternative Options:

  • External hemipelvectomy (amputation)
  • Radiation alone (for Ewing or palliation)
  • Palliation without surgery

Patient Positioning:

Modified Lateral or Floating Position:

  • Allows access to anterior and posterior pelvis
  • Beanbag or pegboard support
  • Ability to rotate patient during surgery

Preparation:

  • Prep from nipple line to knee
  • Prep perineum if pubic resection planned
  • Circumferential leg prep if limb may be sacrificed
  • Foley catheter (may need ureteric stents for complex cases)

Team Setup:

  • Orthopaedic oncology surgeon
  • Vascular surgery on standby
  • Plastic surgery for flap coverage
  • Two consultant-level assistants minimum

Surgical Steps by Resection Type

Type I Iliac Wing Resection

Step 1: Anterior Approach

  • Ilioinguinal or modified iliofemoral incision
  • Identify and protect external iliac vessels
  • Identify and protect femoral nerve
  • Expose iliac crest and anterior ilium

Step 2: Posterior Exposure

  • Extend incision or separate posterior approach
  • Detach gluteal muscles from iliac crest
  • Identify sciatic notch and sciatic nerve
  • Control superior gluteal vessels

Step 3: Osteotomies

  • Superior: Along iliac crest (or through crest for narrow margins)
  • Inferior: Above acetabular dome (confirm with image intensifier)
  • Posterior: Through sciatic notch, protecting sciatic nerve
  • Anterior: Through ASIS or anterior ilium

Step 4: Specimen Removal

  • Remove specimen en bloc
  • Check margins grossly and with frozen section
  • Haemostasis of bony surfaces

Step 5: Closure

  • Reattach abdominal wall to remaining pelvis
  • Layered closure
  • Drain to surgical bed

Type II Periacetabular Resection

Step 1: Vascular Control

  • Retroperitoneal approach to common iliac vessels
  • Identify and control internal iliac artery (may ligate)
  • Protect external iliac vessels with vessel loops
  • Identify and protect ureter

Step 2: Anterior Exposure

  • Extended iliofemoral incision
  • Reflect sartorius and rectus femoris
  • Expose anterior column and pubic symphysis
  • Identify obturator nerve and vessels

Step 3: Hip Dislocation

  • Divide capsule and ligamentum teres
  • Dislocate hip anteriorly or posteriorly
  • OR leave femoral head attached to specimen

Step 4: Posterior Exposure

  • Detach gluteal muscles
  • Divide piriformis and short external rotators
  • Identify and protect (or sacrifice) sciatic nerve
  • Expose posterior column and ischium

Step 5: Osteotomies

  • Ilium: Above acetabulum (Type IIA) or through iliac wing (Type IIB)
  • Pubis: Pubic ramus or symphysis
  • Ischium: Ischial tuberosity or ramus
  • Protect neurovascular structures during cuts

Step 6: Specimen Removal

  • Careful en bloc removal
  • Check margins (gross and frozen section)
  • Control bleeding from remaining bony surfaces

Step 7: Reconstruction

  • See reconstruction options in next tab

Type III Pubic/Ischial Resection

Step 1: Anterior Approach

  • Lower midline or Pfannenstiel incision
  • Retract bladder medially
  • Identify spermatic cord or round ligament
  • Expose pubic symphysis and rami

Step 2: Medial Exposure

  • Detach adductor origins carefully
  • Identify and protect obturator nerve
  • Protect urethra (anterior to symphysis)

Step 3: Osteotomies

  • Pubic symphysis or contralateral pubis
  • Superior pubic ramus
  • Ischiopubic ramus
  • Ischial tuberosity if required

Step 4: Specimen Removal

  • En bloc removal
  • Check margins
  • Haemostasis

Step 5: Closure

  • Repair adductor origins to remaining pelvis
  • Layered closure
  • Drain placement

Reconstruction:

  • Usually NOT required
  • Pelvic ring remains stable through posterior elements
  • Excellent functional outcome expected

Reconstruction Options for Type II Defects

Saddle Prosthesis

Concept:

  • Saddle-shaped femoral component
  • Articulates with cut surface of remaining ilium
  • No formal acetabular reconstruction

Indications:

  • Type II resection with preserved iliac wing
  • Adequate remaining ilium for support
  • Patient with good bone quality

Technique:

  • Prepare remaining ilium surface
  • Insert femoral component (cemented or uncemented)
  • Saddle rests on iliac surface
  • Capsular repair for stability

Outcomes:

  • Ambulatory with walking aids
  • Significant leg length discrepancy
  • High revision rate (mechanical failure)
  • Simple salvage if failure

Custom Pelvic Endoprosthesis

Concept:

  • Patient-specific implant designed from CT
  • Replaces resected hemipelvis
  • Articulates with standard hip components

Indications:

  • Large Type II defects
  • Adequate remaining bone for fixation
  • Younger, active patients

Technique:

  • Preoperative CT for custom design
  • 3D printed cutting guides
  • Modular or custom implant
  • Screw fixation to sacrum and remaining pelvis

Outcomes:

  • Best functional outcome if successful
  • High complication rate (30-50%)
  • Infection, dislocation, loosening common
  • Costly and requires long lead time

Allograft-Prosthetic Composite (APC)

Concept:

  • Hemipelvis allograft provides bone stock
  • THR components for articulation
  • Biological reconstruction with mechanical joint

Indications:

  • Large defects requiring bone stock
  • Younger patients for future revision options
  • Availability of size-matched allograft

Technique:

  • Match allograft to defect size
  • Fix allograft to remaining pelvis (plates, screws)
  • Insert acetabular component into allograft
  • Standard femoral component

Outcomes:

  • Good functional results if successful
  • Allograft nonunion and fracture rates 20-30%
  • Infection risk 15-25%
  • Late allograft resorption possible

Flail Hip (Resection Arthroplasty)

Concept:

  • No formal reconstruction
  • Femur suspended by soft tissues and scar
  • Accepts limb shortening and instability

Indications:

  • Elderly or low-demand patients
  • High infection risk
  • Salvage after failed reconstruction
  • When simplicity preferred over function

Technique:

  • Resect acetabulum as required
  • Smooth remaining bony surfaces
  • Repair soft tissues around proximal femur
  • Limb in traction postoperatively

Outcomes:

  • Ambulatory with walking aids in most
  • Significant limb shortening (5-10cm)
  • Trendelenburg gait
  • Low complication rate

Surgical Technique - External Hemipelvectomy

Indications for Hindquarter Amputation

Primary Indications:

  • Tumour involving sciatic nerve and/or external iliac vessels
  • Extensive soft tissue sarcoma precluding limb salvage
  • Failed internal hemipelvectomy with recurrence
  • Uncontrolled infection with tumour

Surgical Technique

Posterior (Gluteal) Flap Technique

Preferred Technique - provides excellent coverage

Step 1: Anterior Dissection

  • Extended inguinal/ilioinguinal incision
  • Ligate femoral vessels at inguinal ligament
  • Divide femoral nerve
  • Divide adductor muscles at origin
  • Transect pubic symphysis or pubic ramus

Step 2: Posterior Dissection

  • Posterior incision from PSIS to ischial tuberosity
  • Preserve gluteal muscles on posterior flap
  • Divide sciatic nerve high in pelvis
  • Control gluteal vessels (maintain flap perfusion via inferior gluteal)

Step 3: Pelvic Division

  • Sacroiliac joint disarticulation OR
  • Osteotomy through sacral ala
  • Divide sacrospinous and sacrotuberous ligaments
  • Remove specimen en bloc

Step 4: Flap Closure

  • Rotate posterior flap anteriorly
  • Trim excess tissue for contour
  • Tension-free closure
  • Suction drains

Advantages:

  • Excellent soft tissue bulk for sitting
  • Reliable blood supply (inferior gluteal)
  • Good wound healing

Anterior (Quadriceps) Flap Technique

Indications:

  • Posterior tumour involvement (gluteal muscles)
  • Posterior flap not viable
  • Posterior wound contamination

Step 1: Posterior Dissection

  • Posterior incision first
  • Divide gluteal muscles close to iliac crest
  • Ligate gluteal vessels
  • Divide sciatic nerve

Step 2: Anterior Dissection

  • Preserve anterior thigh musculature
  • Divide femoral vessels distally
  • Preserve femoral nerve to quadriceps (for flap vitality)
  • Create myocutaneous flap based on femoral vessels

Step 3: Specimen Removal

  • Pelvic division as per posterior technique
  • Remove specimen

Step 4: Closure

  • Rotate anterior flap posteriorly
  • Contour for sitting surface
  • Close over drains

Disadvantages:

  • Less soft tissue bulk
  • More complex dissection
  • Higher wound complication rate

Extended Hemipelvectomy

Definition:

  • Resection extends beyond hemipelvis
  • May include contralateral pubis, sacral body, or lumbar spine

Indications:

  • Tumour crossing midline
  • Sacral body involvement
  • Chordoma extending into lumbar spine

Additional Considerations:

  • Lumbopelvic reconstruction may be required
  • Significantly higher morbidity
  • Bowel/bladder dysfunction likely
  • May require colostomy/urostomy

Technique Modifications:

  • Often staged procedure
  • Posterior approach for sacral component
  • Spinal instrumentation for stability
  • Combined approach with spinal surgeon

Postoperative Care - External Hemipelvectomy

Immediate:

  • ICU admission (24-48 hours minimum)
  • Fluid resuscitation and transfusion
  • Pain management (epidural or PCA)
  • Wound monitoring

Wound Care:

  • Drains removed when output minimal
  • Monitor flap viability
  • Early identification of wound complications
  • May require negative pressure wound therapy

Rehabilitation:

  • Early mobilisation when stable
  • Wheelchair initially
  • Prosthetic assessment (only 20-30% use prosthesis long-term)
  • Psychological support essential

Complications

Intraoperative Complications

Haemorrhage:

  • Expected blood loss: 3-10 litres
  • Cell saver essential
  • Vascular surgery backup
  • Risk of presacral venous plexus injury
  • Management: Direct pressure, packing, vascular control

Nerve Injury:

  • Sciatic nerve (may be intentional sacrifice)
  • Femoral nerve (must preserve for internal)
  • Lumbosacral plexus injury
  • Obturator nerve

Visceral Injury:

  • Ureter injury (preoperative stents may help)
  • Bladder injury
  • Rectal injury (especially posterior tumours)
  • Requires intraoperative repair

Early Postoperative Complications

Wound Complications:

  • Infection: 15-30%
  • Dehiscence: 10-20%
  • Flap necrosis: 5-15%
  • Seroma/haematoma

Venous Thromboembolism:

  • High risk (10-30% DVT)
  • Pulmonary embolism risk
  • Extended prophylaxis required (4-6 weeks)
  • IVC filter consideration for high-risk

Systemic:

  • Respiratory complications
  • Renal failure (blood loss, contrast, myoglobin)
  • Sepsis
  • Mortality: 1-5%

Late Complications

Local Recurrence:

  • 15-25% with wide margins
  • Higher with positive/close margins
  • Salvage options limited

Reconstruction-Related:

  • Prosthetic dislocation: 10-30%
  • Prosthetic loosening
  • Prosthetic infection: 10-20%
  • Allograft nonunion/fracture

Functional:

  • Chronic pain
  • Phantom limb pain (external hemipelvectomy)
  • Limb length discrepancy
  • Gait abnormality

Evidence Base

Internal Hemipelvectomy Outcomes

Key Findings:
  • 51 patients with internal hemipelvectomy for primary bone sarcoma
  • Local recurrence rate 15% at 5 years
  • 5-year overall survival 62%
  • Major complication rate 47%
  • Functional outcome MSTS score 67%
Clinical Implication: Internal hemipelvectomy provides reasonable oncological and functional outcomes but with high complication rate

Periacetabular Reconstruction Comparison

Key Findings:
  • Compared saddle prosthesis, custom prosthesis, and allograft reconstruction
  • Overall complication rate 50-60% across all methods
  • Custom prosthesis had highest functional scores
  • Flail hip had lowest complication rate but worst function
  • No single reconstruction method clearly superior
Clinical Implication: Reconstruction choice should be individualised based on patient factors, tumour extent, and surgeon experience

External Hemipelvectomy Functional Outcomes

Key Findings:
  • 62 patients underwent hindquarter amputation
  • 5-year survival 45% for primary sarcoma
  • Only 25% used prosthesis long-term
  • Most patients wheelchair-dependent but independent
  • Quality of life acceptable in survivors
Clinical Implication: Hindquarter amputation provides oncological control with acceptable quality of life when limb salvage not possible

Enneking Classification and Prognosis

Key Findings:
  • Defined pelvic resection zones I-IV
  • Type II (periacetabular) most complex with highest morbidity
  • Zone-based approach allows standardised communication
  • Prognosis relates to tumour grade and margins, not zone
  • Classification remains standard for surgical planning
Clinical Implication: Enneking-Dunham classification is essential for surgical planning and communication in pelvic tumour surgery

Wound Complications in Pelvic Sarcoma Surgery

Key Findings:
  • Wound complications in 45% of pelvic sarcoma resections
  • Prior radiation increases wound complication risk 3-fold
  • Posterior flap coverage reduces wound problems in hindquarter amputation
  • Early debridement and VAC therapy improve outcomes
  • MDT approach with plastic surgery reduces complications
Clinical Implication: Wound complications are common after pelvic tumour surgery - plastic surgery involvement and meticulous technique essential

Exam Viva Scenarios

Practice these scenarios to excel in your viva examination

VIVA SCENARIOStandard

EXAMINER

"A 45-year-old presents with a 6-month history of left hip pain. Imaging shows a destructive lesion of the left iliac wing extending to the acetabular dome. Biopsy confirms Grade II chondrosarcoma. How would you manage this patient?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
This is a primary pelvic chondrosarcoma requiring surgical resection. I would complete staging with chest CT and PET-CT. Given Grade II chondrosarcoma is chemotherapy-resistant, treatment is surgical. This appears to be a Type I-II resection (iliac wing with acetabular extension). I would plan internal hemipelvectomy with periacetabular reconstruction using either a saddle prosthesis or custom endoprosthesis. Key considerations include preoperative vascular imaging, blood product availability, and multidisciplinary planning. I would consent for potential external hemipelvectomy if intraoperative findings preclude limb salvage.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Chondrosarcoma is chemotherapy and radiation resistant - surgery is primary treatment
Complete staging before surgery (chest CT, PET-CT)
Enneking-Dunham classification guides resection extent
Type II resection requires acetabular reconstruction
Counsel for potential amputation if limb salvage not achievable
COMMON TRAPS
✗Recommending chemotherapy for chondrosarcoma (not effective except dedifferentiated)
✗Failing to stage before surgery
✗Not having backup plan for amputation
✗Underestimating blood loss and complication risks
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What reconstruction options exist for Type II defects?"
"What are the contraindications to limb salvage?"
"How would your approach differ for osteosarcoma vs chondrosarcoma?"
VIVA SCENARIOChallenging

EXAMINER

"Describe the surgical approach for a Type II internal hemipelvectomy. What are the key steps for vascular control?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
For Type II periacetabular resection, I use an extended iliofemoral approach with the patient in a floating lateral position allowing anterior and posterior access. Vascular control begins with retroperitoneal exposure of the common iliac vessels. I identify and protect the external iliac artery and vein with vessel loops, and typically ligate the internal iliac artery as its branches supply the specimen. The ureter is identified and protected. Anteriorly, I expose the pubic symphysis and protect the femoral nerve. Posteriorly, I detach the gluteal muscles and identify the sciatic nerve, which I preserve if not involved by tumour. Osteotomies are performed with oscillating saw and osteotomes under image guidance. After specimen removal, I check margins with frozen section before reconstruction.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Extended iliofemoral approach with floating position
Early control of common iliac vessels retroperitoneally
Internal iliac artery typically ligated
External iliac vessels and ureter protected
Sciatic and femoral nerve identification critical
Frozen section margin assessment essential
COMMON TRAPS
✗Not controlling vessels before mobilising tumour
✗Forgetting to protect the ureter
✗Not checking margins before reconstruction
✗Inadequate exposure leading to poor visualisation
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What if frozen section shows positive margins?"
"How do you manage unexpected vascular injury?"
"What is your threshold for converting to amputation?"
VIVA SCENARIOCritical

EXAMINER

"A patient is undergoing internal hemipelvectomy. Intraoperatively, you find the tumour is encasing the external iliac vessels. What are your options?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
This is a critical decision point. If the external iliac vessels are encased by tumour, limb salvage may not be possible with clear margins. My options are: 1) Convert to external hemipelvectomy if vessels cannot be preserved - this provides definitive oncological treatment but sacrifices the limb. 2) Vascular reconstruction with interposition graft if the involved segment is short and proximal/distal vessels are healthy. 3) If marginal resection would achieve acceptable margins (for low-grade tumours), consider en bloc vessel resection with reconstruction. I would have the vascular surgery team scrub in immediately. The decision depends on tumour grade, patient factors, and vessel reconstruction feasibility. For high-grade sarcoma, I would lean toward amputation rather than risk positive vascular margins.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Vascular encasement may preclude limb salvage
Options: amputation, vascular reconstruction, marginal resection
Vascular surgery involvement essential
High-grade tumours favour amputation over compromised margins
Patient should have been consented for this scenario
COMMON TRAPS
✗Attempting to shell tumour off vessels (margin contamination)
✗Not having vascular backup available
✗Prioritising limb salvage over oncological margins in high-grade tumours
✗Not having preoperative consent for amputation
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What vascular conduits can be used for reconstruction?"
"What are the survival implications of positive margins?"
"How do you counsel a patient preoperatively about this scenario?"

MCQ Practice Points

Enneking-Dunham Classification

Q: What does Type II resection in the Enneking-Dunham pelvic classification involve? A: Periacetabular resection - removal of the acetabulum and surrounding bone. This is the most complex resection type and requires formal hip reconstruction (saddle prosthesis, custom prosthesis, APC) or acceptance of flail hip.

Internal vs External Hemipelvectomy

Q: What is the key difference between internal and external hemipelvectomy? A: Internal hemipelvectomy is limb-sparing - pelvic bone is resected but the lower extremity is preserved. External hemipelvectomy (hindquarter amputation) removes the entire lower limb through the pelvis. The key determinant is neurovascular bundle involvement.

Vascular Control

Q: Which vessel is typically ligated during internal hemipelvectomy? A: The internal iliac artery is typically ligated as its branches supply the resected specimen. The external iliac artery must be preserved to maintain limb perfusion. Early vascular control is essential before tumour mobilisation.

Flap Selection

Q: What is the preferred flap for wound coverage in external hemipelvectomy? A: The posterior (gluteal) flap is preferred as it provides excellent soft tissue bulk for the sitting surface and has reliable blood supply from the inferior gluteal artery. The anterior flap is used when posterior tissues are involved by tumour.

Chondrosarcoma Treatment

Q: Why is surgical resection the primary treatment for pelvic chondrosarcoma? A: Chondrosarcoma is resistant to chemotherapy and radiation therapy. Wide surgical margins are the only treatment proven to achieve local control and cure. This distinguishes it from osteosarcoma and Ewing sarcoma, which respond to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Australian Context

Australian Practice

Sarcoma Referral Pathways:

Pelvic sarcomas requiring hemipelvectomy should be managed at designated sarcoma centres with multidisciplinary expertise:

Major Centres:

  • Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre (Melbourne)
  • Royal Prince Alfred Hospital (Sydney)
  • Princess Alexandra Hospital (Brisbane)
  • Royal Adelaide Hospital
  • Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital (Perth)

Referral Principles:

  • Biopsy should ideally be performed at the treating centre
  • If biopsy performed locally, discuss technique with sarcoma unit first
  • Complete staging before referral
  • Urgent referral for suspected primary bone sarcoma

Tumour Boards:

  • All pelvic sarcomas discussed at sarcoma MDT
  • Include orthopaedic oncologist, medical oncologist, radiation oncologist, radiologist, pathologist
  • Surgical planning, neoadjuvant therapy, reconstruction discussed

Public Hospital Coverage:

Hemipelvectomy procedures are covered under the Australian public hospital system at designated sarcoma centres:

Surgical Procedures:

  • Radical excision of bone tumour
  • Reconstruction of pelvis
  • Complex soft tissue procedures
  • Vascular reconstruction if required

Prosthetic Options:

  • Custom prostheses may have longer lead times in public system
  • Some centres have access to modular systems
  • Allograft availability through bone banks

Private System:

  • Faster access to custom prostheses
  • Surgeon choice
  • Gap fees apply for private care

Australian Bone and Soft Tissue Sarcoma Service (ABSTS) Data:

The ABSTS network collects outcome data for sarcoma management in Australia:

Pelvic Sarcoma Outcomes:

  • Comparable to international centres
  • 5-year survival 60-70% for localised disease
  • Limb salvage rates 60-70%
  • Centralised care improves outcomes

Quality Indicators:

  • Volume-outcome relationship demonstrated
  • Minimum case volume recommended for centres
  • MDT discussion for all cases

Rehabilitation:

  • Access to prosthetic services through state health systems
  • Oncology rehabilitation programs at major centres
  • Psychological support services available

Centralised Care

Pelvic sarcoma requiring hemipelvectomy should be managed at designated sarcoma centres with MDT expertise for optimal outcomes.

PBS Medications

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy agents (doxorubicin, cisplatin, methotrexate, ifosfamide) are PBS-listed for bone sarcomas through oncology programs.

Hemipelvectomy and Hindquarter Amputation - Exam Summary

High-Yield Exam Summary

Types and Definitions

  • •Internal hemipelvectomy: Pelvic bone resection with limb preservation
  • •External hemipelvectomy: Hindquarter amputation - complete limb removal
  • •Key determinant: Neurovascular bundle involvement

Enneking-Dunham Classification

  • •Type I: Iliac wing (above acetabulum) - often no reconstruction needed
  • •Type II: Periacetabular - most complex, requires reconstruction
  • •Type III: Pubic rami/ischium - minimal reconstruction needed
  • •Type IV: Sacral ala - may need lumbopelvic fixation

Vascular Control

  • •Control common iliac vessels retroperitoneally FIRST
  • •Internal iliac artery typically LIGATED
  • •External iliac vessels MUST BE PRESERVED for limb salvage
  • •Presacral venous plexus - major bleeding risk

Type II Reconstruction Options

  • •Saddle prosthesis: Femur articulates with remaining ilium
  • •Custom endoprosthesis: Best function, highest complication rate
  • •Allograft-prosthetic composite (APC): Biological bone stock
  • •Flail hip: No reconstruction, lowest complications, worst function

External Hemipelvectomy Flaps

  • •Posterior (gluteal) flap: PREFERRED - good bulk, reliable supply
  • •Anterior (quadriceps) flap: When posterior tissues involved
  • •Goal: Adequate sitting surface with tension-free closure

Indications for Amputation

  • •Tumour involving sciatic nerve
  • •External iliac vessel encasement
  • •Failed limb salvage with recurrence
  • •Uncontrolled infection

Tumour Considerations

  • •Chondrosarcoma: Chemo-resistant - surgery alone
  • •Osteosarcoma: Neoadjuvant chemo (MAP), assess response
  • •Ewing sarcoma: Chemo/radio-sensitive, surgery preferred when feasible

Complications

  • •Blood loss: 3-10L expected - cell saver essential
  • •Wound complications: 30-50%
  • •Infection: 15-30%
  • •Local recurrence: 15-25%
  • •Mortality: 1-5%

Key Numbers

  • •5-year survival (localised pelvic sarcoma): 60-70%
  • •Limb salvage rate: 60-70%
  • •Prosthesis use post-hindquarter amputation: 20-30%
  • •Major complication rate: 30-50%
Quick Stats
Reading Time100 min
Related Topics

Bone Island (Enostosis)

Chordoma

Expandable Prostheses in Pediatric Oncology

Fibrosarcoma of Bone