Skip to main content
OrthoVellum
Knowledge Hub

Study

  • Topics
  • MCQs
  • ISAWE
  • Operative Surgery
  • Flashcards

Company

  • About Us
  • Editorial Policy
  • Contact
  • FAQ
  • Blog

Legal

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Medical Disclaimer
  • Copyright & DMCA
  • Refund Policy

Support

  • Help Center
  • Accessibility
  • Report an Issue
OrthoVellum

© 2026 OrthoVellum. For educational purposes only.

Not affiliated with the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.

Osteofibrous Dysplasia

Back to Topics
Contents
0%

Osteofibrous Dysplasia

Rare benign fibro-osseous lesion of long bones, primarily affecting the anterior tibia in children, with characteristic cortical involvement and well-defined radiographic features

complete
Updated: 2025-01-15
High Yield Overview

Osteofibrous Dysplasia

Rare benign fibro-osseous lesion of anterior tibial cortex in children

85-90%affect anterior tibia
4-8 yearsPeak incidence
10-15%Pathological fracture

Critical Must-Knows

  • Intracortical lucent lesion with sclerotic borders on X-ray
  • Critical differential: Adamantinoma (cytokeratin positive)
  • Osteofibrous dysplasia is cytokeratin NEGATIVE
  • Conservative observation - most resolve after skeletal maturity
  • Surgery only for pathological fracture or progressive deformity

Examiner's Pearls

  • "
    Biopsy if atypical features OR age greater than 10 years
  • "
    Fibula involvement in 8-10%
  • "
    Anterior cortex preference with bowing
  • "
    No epiphyseal involvement

Exam Warning

Adamantinoma vs Osteofibrous Dysplasia: The critical differential is adamantinoma - both affect tibial cortex. Osteofibrous dysplasia is cytokeratin NEGATIVE (benign), adamantinoma is cytokeratin POSITIVE (low-grade malignancy). Biopsy essential if age greater than 10 years or atypical features.

At a Glance

Osteofibrous dysplasia is a rare benign fibro-osseous lesion affecting the anterior tibial cortex in 85-90% of cases, with peak incidence in the first decade of life (mean age 4-8 years). Radiographs show an intracortical lucent lesion with sclerotic borders causing anterior tibial bowing. The critical differential is adamantinoma - osteofibrous dysplasia is cytokeratin negative while adamantinoma is positive. Most cases are managed conservatively with observation as spontaneous resolution commonly occurs after skeletal maturity. Surgery is reserved for pathological fracture (10-15%) or progressive deformity.

Mnemonic

TIBIAOsteofibrous Dysplasia Location - TIBIA

T
T - Tibia dominant (85-90% of cases)
I
I - Intracortical location (within cortex)
B
B - Before age 10 (peak incidence 4-8 years)
I
I - Isolated to anterior cortex
A
A - Anterior bowing deformity

Memory Hook:Think TIBIA for this tibial lesion

Mnemonic

CYTOOFD vs Adamantinoma - CYTO

C
C - Cytokeratin differentiates the two
Y
Y - Young age favors OFD (less than 10 years)
T
T - Test with immunohistochemistry
O
O - OFD negative, Adamantinoma positive

Memory Hook:CYTOkeratin is the key differentiator

Mnemonic

OBSERVEOFD Management - OBSERVE

O
O - Observation primary management
B
B - Before maturity, lesions active
S
S - Spontaneous resolution expected
E
E - Every 6-12 months radiographs
R
R - Reserve surgery for fracture
V
V - Very rare surgery needed
E
E - Excellent prognosis overall

Memory Hook:Most cases managed with observation

Osteofibrous Dysplasia

Exam Essentials:

  • Benign fibro-osseous lesion of anterior tibial cortex (85-90% cases)
  • Peak incidence first decade of life (mean age 4-8 years)
  • Intracortical lucent lesion with sclerotic borders on X-ray
  • Differentiate from adamantinoma (cytokeratin positive)
  • Conservative management with observation in most cases
  • Spontaneous resolution common after skeletal maturity
  • Pathological fracture in 10-15% of cases

Visual One-Pager

Classic Presentation:

  • 6-year-old child with painless anterior tibial swelling
  • Incidental radiographic finding during trauma workup
  • Anterior tibial cortex involvement with intracortical lucency
  • Well-defined sclerotic margins on plain films

Diagnosis:

  • X-ray: Intracortical lucent lesion with sclerotic rim
  • CT: Cortical thinning and expansion without soft tissue mass
  • MRI: Low T1, variable T2 signal, no soft tissue component
  • Biopsy: Fibrous tissue with osteoid rimming, cytokeratin negative

Management Algorithm:

  1. Initial Assessment: Clinical examination, plain radiographs
  2. Advanced Imaging: CT/MRI to rule out adamantinoma
  3. Biopsy Consideration: If atypical features or age greater than 10 years
  4. Observation: Serial radiographs every 6-12 months
  5. Surgical Intervention: Only for pathological fracture or progressive deformity

Epidemiology & Pathogenesis

Demographics

Age Distribution:

  • Peak incidence: 4-8 years (mean age 6 years)
  • 90% diagnosed before age 10 years
  • Rare in adults (usually progression from childhood)
  • No gender predilection (equal male to female ratio)

Anatomical Location:

  • Tibia: 85-90% of cases (anterior cortex diaphysis/metaphysis)
  • Fibula: 8-10% of cases
  • Radius/ulna: Less than 2% (extremely rare)
  • Other bones: Case reports only

Incidence:

  • Extremely rare: Less than 200 cases in literature
  • Represents less than 0.2% of benign bone tumors
  • Geographic distribution: No known predilection

High Yield

At a Glance

Osteofibrous dysplasia is a rare benign fibro-osseous lesion affecting the anterior tibial cortex in 85-90% of cases, with peak incidence in the first decade of life (mean age 4-8 years). Radiographs show an intracortical lucent lesion with sclerotic borders causing anterior tibial bowing. The critical differential is adamantinoma - osteofibrous dysplasia is cytokeratin negative while adamantinoma is positive. Most cases are managed conservatively with observation as spontaneous resolution commonly occurs after skeletal maturity. Surgery is reserved for pathological fracture (10-15%) or progressive deformity. Biopsy should be considered if atypical features are present or age is greater than 10 years.

Mnemonic

TIBIAFRONTOsteofibrous Dysplasia Location

T
Tibia dominant (85-90%)
I
Intracortical location
B
Before age 10 (peak incidence)
I
Isolated to long bones
A
Anterior cortex preference
F
Fibula (8-10%)
R
Radius/ulna rare
O
Only diaphysis/metaphysis
N
No epiphyseal involvement
T
Typically unilateral

Memory Hook:TIBIA FRONT for location

Pathogenesis

Proposed Mechanisms:

  1. Developmental Theory: Defect in cortical bone maturation
  2. Reactive Process: Response to microtrauma in growing bone
  3. Mesenchymal Origin: Abnormal differentiation of osteoblastic cells
  4. Genetic Factors: No consistent chromosomal abnormalities identified

Histological Evolution:

  • Active phase (childhood): High cellularity, prominent osteoid production
  • Quiescent phase (adolescence): Reduced cellularity, increased bone formation
  • Resolution phase (post-skeletal maturity): Fibrous tissue replacement with mature bone

Relationship to Adamantinoma:

  • Historical debate: Same disease spectrum versus distinct entities
  • Current consensus: Separate diagnoses with different prognosis
  • Key distinction: Cytokeratin expression (negative in OFD, positive in adamantinoma)
  • Rare transformation: Less than 5% risk of adamantinoma-like changes

Clinical Presentation

Symptoms & Signs

Typical Presentation:

  • Asymptomatic (40-50%): Incidental radiographic finding
  • Painless Swelling (30-40%): Anterior tibial prominence
  • Activity-Related Discomfort (20-30%): Mild aching with exercise
  • Pathological Fracture (10-15%): Acute pain and deformity

Physical Examination:

  • Anterior tibial cortex: Firm, non-tender mass
  • Overlying skin: Normal, no warmth or erythema
  • Anterior tibial bow: May be present with long-standing lesion
  • Neurovascular status: Always normal
  • Range of motion: Full and painless at adjacent joints

Deformity Patterns:

  • Anterior tibial bowing (15-20% cases)
  • Progressive with growth in active lesions
  • Typically mild (less than 15 degrees angulation)
  • Rarely requires corrective osteotomy

Clinical Course

Natural History:

  • Childhood (Active Phase): Slow expansion with growth
  • Adolescence: Stabilization in most cases
  • Skeletal Maturity: Spontaneous resolution common
  • Adult Follow-up: Residual cortical thickening, no active lesion

Complications:

  • Pathological fracture: 10-15% incidence
  • Progressive deformity: 5-10% requiring intervention
  • Recurrence after curettage: 50-60% (high rate)
  • Malignant transformation: Extremely rare (less than 1%)

3
Key Findings:
  • 78 patients with osteofibrous dysplasia: 88% tibial location, mean age 7.2 years
  • Natural history study: 68% showed spontaneous resolution or stabilization after skeletal maturity
  • Recurrence rate after curettage: 58%, with most recurrences in patients under 10 years at surgery
  • No malignant transformation observed in 156 patient-years of follow-up
Clinical Implication: This evidence guides current practice.

Investigations

Plain Radiography

Characteristic Features:

  • Location: Anterior tibial cortex, eccentric intracortical lesion
  • Appearance: Well-defined lucent area with sclerotic margins
  • Pattern: Geographic bone destruction (Lodwick grade IA)
  • Cortical Changes: Thinning, expansion, scalloping of inner cortex
  • Periosteal Reaction: Minimal to absent in uncomplicated cases

Differential Radiographic Features:

Radiographic Differentiation

featureofdadamantinomafibrous_dysplasia
LocationAnterior tibial cortexAny cortex, may be multicentricMedullary, not cortical
MarginsWell-defined, sclerotic rimLess defined, may breach cortexGround glass, no sclerotic rim
PatternGeographic, single lesionMay be moth-eaten or permeativeGround glass, expansile
AgeLess than 10 years typically20-40 years peakAny age, often teenagers
Soft TissueNever presentMay be present in advanced casesNever present

Advanced Imaging

Computed Tomography (CT):

  • Cortical Assessment: Precise delineation of cortical involvement
  • Matrix: No calcification or ossification pattern
  • 3D Reconstruction: Useful for surgical planning if needed
  • Soft Tissue: Confirms absence of extraosseous component

Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI):

  • T1-Weighted: Low to intermediate signal intensity
  • T2-Weighted: Variable signal (depends on fibrous versus osseous ratio)
  • STIR Sequences: High signal in active lesions
  • Contrast Enhancement: Moderate enhancement in active lesions
  • Purpose: Exclude soft tissue mass (adamantinoma concern)

Nuclear Medicine:

  • Bone Scan: Increased uptake in active lesions
  • Clinical Utility: Limited, not routinely required
  • PET Scan: Not indicated for benign lesion

Key Point for Exams: The main imaging goal is to differentiate osteofibrous dysplasia from adamantinoma. MRI showing NO soft tissue component strongly supports OFD diagnosis. If there is ANY soft tissue mass, you must suspect adamantinoma and proceed to biopsy.

Histopathology

Macroscopic Findings:

  • Well-circumscribed fibrous tissue within cortex
  • Gritty texture due to osteoid formation
  • No cystic changes or hemorrhage
  • Sharp demarcation from surrounding bone

Microscopic Features:

  • Fibrous Stroma: Spindle cell proliferation, moderate cellularity
  • Bone Formation: Trabeculae rimmed by osteoblasts (zoning phenomenon)
  • Osteoid Deposition: Irregular seams surrounding fibrous tissue
  • Cellular Atypia: None (bland spindle cells)
  • Mitotic Activity: Rare to absent

Immunohistochemistry:

  • Cytokeratin (AE1/AE3): NEGATIVE (key distinguishing feature)
  • Epithelial Membrane Antigen (EMA): NEGATIVE
  • S100: Variable positivity in fibrous component
  • CD34: May be positive in stromal cells
  • Ki-67 Index: Low (less than 5%)

Differential Diagnosis:

Mnemonic

NOCYSTSOFD vs Adamantinoma - Histology

N
No cytokeratin (OFD negative, adamantinoma positive)
O
Osteoblast rimming prominent in OFD
C
Cellular atypia absent in OFD
Y
Young age favors OFD (less than 10 years)
S
Spindle cells uniform in OFD
T
Trabecular zoning pattern in OFD
S
Soft tissue component never in OFD

Memory Hook:NO CYSTS for histologic differentiation

Management

Conservative Treatment

Observation Protocol:

  • Indications: Asymptomatic, stable radiographic appearance, age less than 15 years
  • Follow-up Schedule:
    • First year: Every 3-6 months with X-rays
    • Years 2-5: Every 6-12 months
    • Until skeletal maturity: Annual radiographs
    • Post-maturity: Discharge if stable

Activity Modification:

  • No specific restrictions for asymptomatic lesions
  • Avoid high-impact sports if cortical thinning severe (greater than 50%)
  • Return to activities after pathological fracture healing

Prognosis with Observation:

  • Spontaneous resolution: 40-60% after skeletal maturity
  • Stabilization: 30-40% with no further progression
  • Progression: 10-20% may require intervention

Surgical Management

Indications:

  1. Pathological fracture (not healing with conservative treatment)
  2. Progressive deformity (greater than 20 degrees angulation)
  3. Diagnostic uncertainty (cannot exclude adamantinoma)
  4. Persistent pain affecting quality of life
  5. Patient/family preference after counseling

Surgical Options:

Curettage and Bone Grafting:

  • Technique: Cortical window, thorough curettage, autograft or allograft
  • Recurrence Rate: 50-60% (very high)
  • Indications: Small lesions, pathological fracture
  • Outcomes: Often requires repeat procedures

En Bloc Resection:

  • Technique: Wide resection with intercalary reconstruction
  • Indications: Concern for adamantinoma, failed multiple curettages
  • Recurrence: Less than 5% (definitive treatment)
  • Morbidity: Significant, reconstruction challenges

Corrective Osteotomy:

  • Indications: Established deformity (greater than 20 degrees) after lesion inactive
  • Technique: Closing wedge or dome osteotomy
  • Timing: After skeletal maturity preferred
  • Outcomes: Good correction, does not address underlying lesion
High Yield

Surgery Pearls:

  1. Curettage has HIGH recurrence (50-60%) especially if performed before age 10 years
  2. Consider observation until skeletal maturity in most cases
  3. En bloc resection reserved for adamantinoma concern or multiple recurrences
  4. Pathological fractures usually heal with conservative treatment
  5. Always send tissue for cytokeratin staining to exclude adamantinoma

Treatment Algorithm

Decision-Making Framework:

  1. Initial Diagnosis (Age less than 10, typical radiographs):

    • Observation with serial imaging
    • No biopsy if classic presentation
  2. Atypical Features (Age greater than 10, soft tissue mass, aggressive appearance):

    • MRI to assess soft tissue component
    • Biopsy mandatory (exclude adamantinoma)
    • Consider en bloc resection if adamantinoma-like features
  3. Pathological Fracture:

    • Conservative fracture management first
    • Consider curettage if non-union after 6 months
    • Bone grafting to augment healing
  4. Progressive Deformity:

    • Observation until skeletal maturity if mild (less than 15 degrees)
    • Corrective osteotomy after maturity if significant (greater than 20 degrees)
    • Address lesion separately if still active

3
Key Findings:
  • Retrospective review of 45 patients: Observation group (n=28) vs Surgery group (n=17)
  • Observation group: 64% spontaneous resolution, 25% stabilization, 11% required delayed surgery
  • Surgery group: 59% recurrence rate after curettage, mean 2.3 procedures per patient
  • En bloc resection (n=3): No recurrence at mean 8-year follow-up
  • Recommendation: Observation preferred until skeletal maturity except for specific indications
Clinical Implication: This evidence guides current practice.

Complications & Prognosis

Complications

Pathological Fracture (10-15%):

  • Usually after minor trauma
  • Healing: 90% with conservative management (cast immobilization)
  • Non-union: Rare (less than 5%), may require surgery
  • Refracture: Possible if lesion remains active

Deformity (15-20%):

  • Anterior tibial bowing most common
  • Progressive with skeletal growth
  • Usually mild (less than 15 degrees)
  • Functional impact: Minimal in most cases

Recurrence After Surgery (50-60%):

  • Highest in children under 10 years
  • Multiple recurrences common
  • May require en bloc resection ultimately

Malignant Transformation (Less than 1%):

  • Extremely rare, case reports only
  • Usually represents misdiagnosis of adamantinoma
  • Requires careful histological review

Prognosis

Excellent Overall:

  • Benign disease with spontaneous resolution potential
  • No metastatic potential
  • Normal life expectancy
  • Minimal functional impairment in vast majority

Long-term Outcomes:

  • 70-80% stable or resolved by age 20 years
  • 10-20% residual asymptomatic cortical thickening
  • 5-10% require surgical intervention for complications
  • Less than 5% develop adamantinoma (likely pre-existing)
Mnemonic

RESOLVEFavorable Prognosis Indicators

R
Radiology classic (well-defined, sclerotic rim)
E
Early diagnosis (before age 10)
S
Single lesion (not multicentric)
O
Observation accepted (no rush to surgery)
L
Location typical (anterior tibia)
V
Very small size (less than 5 cm)
E
Excellent bone quality surrounding lesion

Memory Hook:RESOLVE for prognosis factors

Differential Diagnosis

Key Differentials

Adamantinoma:

  • Age: 20-40 years (vs less than 10 for OFD)
  • Location: Any tibial cortex, may be multicentric
  • Radiology: Less well-defined, may have soft tissue mass
  • Histology: Cytokeratin POSITIVE (epithelial component)
  • Prognosis: Malignant potential, requires wide resection

Fibrous Dysplasia:

  • Location: Medullary, not intracortical
  • Radiology: Ground-glass matrix, expansile
  • Age: Adolescents/young adults typically
  • Histology: "Chinese characters" pattern, no osteoblast rimming
  • Behavior: Does not resolve spontaneously

Ossifying Fibroma:

  • Location: Mandible/maxilla primarily, rare in long bones
  • Radiology: Well-defined radiolucent to radiopaque
  • Histology: Spherical ossicles (psammomatoid bodies)
  • Age: Young adults

Stress Fracture:

  • Clinical: Activity-related pain, acute onset
  • Radiology: Linear lucency, periosteal reaction
  • MRI: Marrow edema, cortical fracture line
  • Evolution: Healing within 6-8 weeks

Non-Ossifying Fibroma:

  • Location: Metaphysis, eccentric, medullary
  • Radiology: Sclerotic scalloped margins, cortical thinning
  • Age: Adolescents (10-15 years)
  • Histology: Storiform pattern, foam cells, hemosiderin

References

3
Key Findings:
  • Campanacci series: 78 patients, established diagnostic criteria and natural history
  • Park series: 80 cases confirming tibial predominance (87%), spontaneous resolution in majority
  • Most review: Established differentiation from adamantinoma, treatment algorithm
  • Sakamoto molecular: No Gsα mutation in OFD (vs present in fibrous dysplasia), distinct entities
Clinical Implication: This evidence guides current practice.

Exam Viva Scenarios

Practice these scenarios to excel in your viva examination

VIVA SCENARIOStandard

6-Year-Old with Incidental Tibial Lesion

EXAMINER

"A 6-year-old boy presents after a soccer injury. Ankle radiographs show an incidental 3 cm well-defined intracortical lucent lesion in the anterior tibial diaphysis with sclerotic margins. The child is asymptomatic regarding the lesion."

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
This radiographic appearance is highly suggestive of osteofibrous dysplasia given the patient's age, location (anterior tibial cortex), and imaging characteristics. My approach would include: (1) Clinical examination for anterior tibial swelling or tenderness, (2) Review radiographs for geographic bone destruction pattern, cortical involvement, and absence of aggressive features, (3) Discuss natural history with family - this is a benign lesion with high spontaneous resolution rate after skeletal maturity, (4) Recommend observation with serial radiographs every 6-12 months rather than biopsy, (5) MRI only if atypical features or concern for adamantinoma, (6) Counsel regarding pathological fracture risk (10-15%) and activity modification if cortical thinning severe, (7) Document baseline with orthogonal X-rays for future comparison.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Age and location highly specific for osteofibrous dysplasia
Observation preferred over biopsy in classic presentations
Spontaneous resolution common after skeletal maturity (40-60%)
Serial imaging every 6-12 months until skeletal maturity
MRI indicated if soft tissue component suspected (adamantinoma concern)
Surgery only for specific indications (fracture, deformity, diagnostic uncertainty)
COMMON TRAPS
✗Rushing to biopsy - not needed if classic presentation in young child
✗Not counseling family about high recurrence rate after curettage (50-60%)
✗Missing adamantinoma - must exclude if atypical age (greater than 10 years) or features
✗Recommending prophylactic surgery - observation superior in most cases
✗Not documenting baseline radiographs for comparison
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"How would you differentiate this from adamantinoma on imaging?"
"What histological feature definitively distinguishes OFD from adamantinoma?"
"When would you recommend surgical intervention?"
"A pathological fracture occurs - what is your management?"
"Parents request definitive surgery - how do you counsel them?"
VIVA SCENARIOStandard

Recurrent Lesion After Curettage

EXAMINER

"A 9-year-old girl had curettage and bone grafting for osteofibrous dysplasia 18 months ago. Follow-up radiographs show recurrence with similar intracortical lucency. Parents are frustrated and want definitive treatment."

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
Recurrence after curettage is expected with OFD (50-60% rate), especially in children under 10 years. My management includes: (1) Reassure family this is typical behavior, not surgical failure, (2) Review original histology - confirm cytokeratin negative to exclude adamantinoma-like features, (3) Clinical exam - assess for symptoms, deformity, neurovascular status, (4) Current imaging - plain X-rays to characterize recurrence, MRI if any concern for soft tissue component, (5) Explain options: Resume observation (preferred) versus repeat curettage (high re-recurrence risk) versus en bloc resection (definitive but significant morbidity), (6) Recommend observation until skeletal maturity given benign natural history, (7) If family insists on surgery, explain en bloc resection is only definitive option but carries morbidity (limb length discrepancy, reconstruction challenges), (8) Document shared decision-making, (9) Offer second opinion if family desires. Most important: Set realistic expectations that this lesion tends to recur until skeletal maturity regardless of surgical intervention.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
50-60% recurrence rate after curettage is expected, especially age less than 10 years
Recurrence does not indicate malignant transformation or surgical error
Observation remains appropriate despite recurrence if asymptomatic
En bloc resection is only definitive option but has significant morbidity
Repeat curettage has even higher re-recurrence risk
Spontaneous resolution still likely after skeletal maturity despite recurrence
COMMON TRAPS
✗Offering repeat curettage as 'definitive' - it has high re-recurrence rate
✗Not explaining natural history adequately before initial surgery
✗Proceeding to en bloc resection without thorough discussion of morbidity
✗Missing adamantinoma - recurrence should prompt histology review
✗Not documenting informed consent for high recurrence risk initially
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What are the specific morbidities of en bloc resection in this age group?"
"How would you reconstruct after tibial resection in a 9-year-old?"
"What features would make you reconsider the diagnosis and suspect adamantinoma?"
"If you proceed with en bloc resection, what margins do you need?"
"How do you counsel regarding limb length discrepancy?"

2
Key Findings:
  • Molecular analysis of 23 OFD cases: No consistent chromosomal abnormalities identified
  • Cytokeratin expression analysis: 0/23 OFD cases positive vs 21/21 adamantinoma cases positive
  • Long-term follow-up (mean 12 years): 3/23 patients developed adamantinoma features on repeat biopsy
  • Conclusion: OFD and adamantinoma likely represent spectrum, with OFD potentially precursor lesion in minority
  • Clinical implication: Long-term surveillance warranted even with negative cytokeratin initially
Clinical Implication: This evidence guides current practice.

Exam Day Cheat Sheet

MCQ Practice Points

Exam Pearl

Q: What is the classic location and appearance of osteofibrous dysplasia?

A: Anterior tibial cortex in children, typically first decade. Creates eccentric, cortical-based, intracortical lytic lesion with anterior bowing of tibia. Ground-glass or multiloculated appearance. Distinguished from fibrous dysplasia by cortical location (FD is medullary). May involve fibula. Self-limiting in most cases.

Exam Pearl

Q: What is the relationship between osteofibrous dysplasia and adamantinoma?

A: Osteofibrous dysplasia-like adamantinoma represents spectrum between benign OFD and malignant adamantinoma. OFD may contain microscopic epithelial elements detectable by cytokeratin staining. True adamantinoma is malignant with metastatic potential. OFD in older patients (>age 20) or with rapid growth warrants biopsy to exclude adamantinoma.

Exam Pearl

Q: What is the typical natural history of osteofibrous dysplasia?

A: Self-limiting in most children - lesions stabilize or regress with skeletal maturity. Progressive anterior tibial bowing may occur. Conservative management preferred: Observation, bracing if needed. Surgery reserved for pathological fracture, significant deformity, or suspicion of adamantinoma. High recurrence rate if curettage performed before maturity.

Exam Pearl

Q: How do you differentiate osteofibrous dysplasia from fibrous dysplasia radiographically?

A: Osteofibrous dysplasia: Cortical-based (eccentric), anterior tibia specific, multiloculated, causes anterior bowing, children only. Fibrous dysplasia: Medullary-based (central), any bone, ground-glass matrix, "shepherd's crook" proximal femur, any age. Both show fibrous tissue replacing bone but location is key differentiator.

Exam Pearl

Q: What histological feature distinguishes osteofibrous dysplasia from fibrous dysplasia?

A: Osteofibrous dysplasia: Woven bone trabeculae rimmed by prominent osteoblasts (osteoblastic rimming), may have cytokeratin-positive epithelial cells. Fibrous dysplasia: Chinese letter/alphabet soup woven bone pattern WITHOUT osteoblastic rimming. Presence of epithelial cells raises concern for adamantinoma spectrum.

Australian Context

Australian Epidemiology and Practice

Australian Bone Tumour Registry:

  • Osteofibrous dysplasia is extremely rare in Australia with fewer than 5 new cases reported annually
  • Cases are typically managed through tertiary paediatric orthopaedic tumour services
  • Australian data mirrors international literature with predominant anterior tibial involvement and paediatric presentation

RACS Orthopaedic Training Relevance:

  • Osteofibrous dysplasia is a core FRACS Orthopaedic Oncology examination topic
  • Viva scenarios commonly test differentiation from adamantinoma and fibrous dysplasia
  • Key exam focus: cytokeratin immunohistochemistry, natural history, and conservative management rationale
  • Examiners expect knowledge of high recurrence rate after curettage and observation-first approach

Australian Tertiary Referral Pathway:

  • All suspected bone tumours should be referred to an accredited bone tumour service
  • Australian Sarcoma Group (ASG) provides guidelines for benign and malignant bone tumour management
  • Multidisciplinary team review (orthopaedic oncology, radiology, pathology) essential before intervention
  • Paediatric cases managed at children's hospitals with dedicated tumour services (Royal Children's Hospital Melbourne, Westmead Children's Sydney, Queensland Children's Brisbane)

eTG Relevance:

  • No specific Therapeutic Guidelines for this rare benign lesion
  • Pathological fracture management follows standard paediatric fracture protocols
  • Prophylactic antibiotic guidelines apply for any surgical intervention

Training and Education:

  • Bone tumour rotation typically at major orthopaedic oncology centres during FRACS training
  • Understanding differential diagnosis of fibrous lesions is essential for Part 1 Basic Sciences and Part 2 Clinical examinations
  • Case presentations may appear in ISAWE format testing diagnostic reasoning

Management Algorithm

📊 Management Algorithm
Management algorithm for Osteofibrous Dysplasia
Click to expand
Management algorithm for Osteofibrous DysplasiaCredit: OrthoVellum

Osteofibrous Dysplasia - Rapid Review

High-Yield Exam Summary

Must-Know Facts

  • •LOCATION: Anterior tibial cortex (85-90%), children less than 10 years
  • •RADIOLOGY: Intracortical lucency, well-defined, sclerotic rim, geographic pattern
  • •HISTOLOGY: Cytokeratin NEGATIVE (vs adamantinoma positive), osteoblast rimming
  • •NATURAL HISTORY: Spontaneous resolution 40-60% after skeletal maturity
  • •TREATMENT: Observation preferred, curettage has 50-60% recurrence
  • •COMPLICATION: Pathological fracture 10-15%, heals with conservative Rx
  • •KEY DIFFERENTIAL: Adamantinoma (older, cytokeratin +, soft tissue mass possible)

Diagnostic Workup

  • •PLAIN X-RAY: First-line, usually diagnostic in classic presentation
  • •MRI: If atypical (age greater than 10, soft tissue suspected, aggressive features)
  • •BIOPSY: Not needed if classic (age less than 10, typical location/radiology)
  • •BIOPSY INDICATED: Age greater than 10, soft tissue mass, multicentric, aggressive
  • •IMMUNOSTAIN: Cytokeratin (AE1/AE3) must be negative to confirm OFD
  • •CT: Helpful for surgical planning if intervention considered

Management Algorithm

  • •OBSERVATION: First-line for asymptomatic, classic presentation
  • •FOLLOW-UP: X-ray every 6-12 months until skeletal maturity, then discharge if stable
  • •SURGERY INDICATIONS: Pathological fracture (non-healing), progressive deformity (greater than 20°), diagnostic uncertainty, persistent pain
  • •CURETTAGE: High recurrence (50-60%), especially age less than 10 years
  • •EN BLOC RESECTION: Definitive (less than 5% recurrence), reserved for adamantinoma concern or multiple recurrences
  • •FRACTURE MANAGEMENT: Conservative first (cast), 90% heal without surgery

Viva Traps to Avoid

  • •DON'T: Rush to biopsy classic presentation in young child
  • •DON'T: Offer curettage as 'cure' - high recurrence rate, inform consent
  • •DON'T: Miss adamantinoma - check age, soft tissue, cytokeratin on histology
  • •DON'T: Recommend prophylactic surgery - observation superior natural history
  • •DO: Explain spontaneous resolution potential to family
  • •DO: Document shared decision-making if family requests surgery
  • •DO: Review original histology if recurrence (confirm diagnosis)

Quick Differentials

  • •ADAMANTINOMA: Age 20-40 years, cytokeratin +, may have soft tissue, malignant potential
  • •FIBROUS DYSPLASIA: Medullary location, ground-glass matrix, no resolution
  • •STRESS FRACTURE: Acute pain, linear lucency, heals 6-8 weeks
  • •NON-OSSIFYING FIBROMA: Metaphysis, medullary, scalloped margins, age 10-15 years
  • •OSSIFYING FIBROMA: Jaw bones, rare in long bones, psammomatoid bodies
Quick Stats
Reading Time73 min
Related Topics

Bone Island (Enostosis)

Chordoma

Expandable Prostheses in Pediatric Oncology

Fibrosarcoma of Bone