Skip to main content
OrthoVellum
Knowledge Hub

Study

  • Topics
  • MCQs
  • ISAWE
  • Operative Surgery
  • Flashcards

Company

  • About Us
  • For Training Programs
  • Authors
  • Editorial Policy
  • Editorial Board
  • Content Methodology
  • Advertising Policy
  • Contact
  • FAQ
  • Blog

Legal

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Medical Disclaimer
  • Copyright & DMCA
  • Refund Policy

Support

  • Help Center
  • Accessibility
  • Report an Issue
OrthoVellum

© 2026 OrthoVellum. For educational purposes only.

Not affiliated with the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.

Paediatric
Core
High Yield

Paediatric Lower Limb Alignment Examination

Comprehensive examination of lower limb alignment in children including assessment of genu varum/valgum, in-toeing/out-toeing, leg length discrepancy, and differentiation of physiological from pathological variants.

Paediatric Lower Limb Alignment Examination

Examiner Favorite

Lower limb alignment examination in children requires understanding of normal developmental variation. Examiners expect you to differentiate physiological from pathological conditions, measure angular and rotational profiles, and know when investigation is warranted.

Quick Reference One-Pager

Lower Limb Alignment Examination Summary

High-Yield Exam Summary

Normal Development

  • •Birth to 2 years: Physiological varus (bow-legged)
  • •2-4 years: Neutral to physiological valgus
  • •4-7 years: Maximum valgus (up to 12°)
  • •7+ years: Adult alignment (5-7° valgus)

Angular (Coronal)

  • •Intercondylar distance: Varus measurement
  • •Intermalleolar distance: Valgus measurement
  • •Assess bilaterally and compare sides

Rotational (Transverse)

  • •Hip rotation profile
  • •Thigh-foot angle (tibial torsion)
  • •Foot progression angle
  • •Metatarsus adductus

Red Flags

  • •Unilateral or asymmetric
  • •Progressive deformity
  • •Outside normal age range
  • •Short stature/skeletal dysplasia
  • •Pain or functional limitation

Normal Developmental Alignment

Angular Alignment (Coronal Plane)

Normal Development:

  • Birth: 10-15° varus (bow-legged)
  • 18 months: Neutral alignment
  • 2-4 years: Progressive valgus
  • 4 years: Maximum valgus (up to 12°)
  • 7 years: Adult alignment (5-7° valgus)

Key Point: Most angular deformities in toddlers are physiological and will correct spontaneously.

Must Know

When to Worry About Angular Deformity:

  1. Varus persisting beyond age 2-3 years
  2. Varus increasing after age 2
  3. Unilateral or asymmetric deformity
  4. Associated with short stature
  5. Lateral thrust with walking
  6. Intermalleolar distance greater than 8cm (valgus)
  7. Intercondylar distance greater than 6cm (varus)

Examination Technique

Standing Assessment

Position:

  • Child standing with knees facing forward
  • Feet slightly apart, patellae neutral
  • If possible, assess with knees extended

Varus (Bow-Legged) Assessment:

  • Stand behind child
  • Bring medial malleoli together
  • Measure intercondylar distance (cm)
  • Normal: Up to 6cm in physiological varus age

Valgus (Knock-Knee) Assessment:

  • Bring medial femoral condyles together
  • Measure intermalleolar distance (cm)
  • Normal: Up to 8cm at age 4 years

Intercondylar Distance Measurement

Quantify genu varum

Technique

  1. 1Child stands with medial malleoli touching
  2. 2Knees extended, patellae facing forward
  3. 3Measure distance between medial femoral condyles
Positive Sign

Distance greater than 6cm after age 2 years

Indicates

Excessive genu varum - consider Blount's disease, rickets, or skeletal dysplasia

Diagnostic Accuracy

Sensitivity85%

Ability to detect true positives

Specificity80%

Ability to exclude false positives

Intermalleolar Distance Measurement

Quantify genu valgum

Technique

  1. 1Child stands with medial femoral condyles touching
  2. 2Knees extended
  3. 3Measure distance between medial malleoli
Positive Sign

Distance greater than 8cm at any age

Indicates

Excessive genu valgum - usually physiological if bilateral and symmetric

Diagnostic Accuracy

Sensitivity80%

Ability to detect true positives

Specificity75%

Ability to exclude false positives

Rotational Profile

Understanding Rotational Alignment

Components of Rotation:

  1. Femoral anteversion (hip internal/external rotation)
  2. Tibial torsion (thigh-foot angle)
  3. Foot shape (metatarsus adductus/normal)

Foot Progression Angle (FPA):

  • Angle of foot to line of progression during walking
  • Normal: 10° external (range: -3° to +20°)
  • Negative = in-toeing
  • Positive = out-toeing

Causes by Level:

1. Metatarsus Adductus (Foot Level):

  • Bean-shaped foot
  • Lateral border curved
  • Bisection of heel points lateral to 2nd toe
  • Usually resolves by 2 years

2. Internal Tibial Torsion:

  • Negative thigh-foot angle
  • Normal: 0-20° external
  • In-toeing: Neutral or internal
  • Improves with walking

3. Femoral Anteversion:

  • Increased internal rotation of hip
  • Decreased external rotation
  • "W-sitting" posture
  • Usually resolves by age 8-10

Most Common: 3-6 years = increased femoral anteversion

Causes by Level:

1. External Tibial Torsion:

  • Increased thigh-foot angle (greater than 30°)
  • Often with flat feet

2. Femoral Retroversion:

  • Decreased internal rotation
  • Increased external rotation
  • Less common, may be pathological

3. External Rotation Contracture (Infant):

  • Prenatal molding
  • Resolves spontaneously

Associated Conditions:

  • SCFE (obligate external rotation)
  • Cerebral palsy
  • Slipped capital femoral epiphysis

Hip Rotation Profile

Assess femoral version

Technique

  1. 1Child prone, knees flexed to 90°
  2. 2Allow legs to fall to sides
  3. 3Measure internal and external rotation
Positive Sign

Internal rotation greater than 70° with external rotation less than 20°

Indicates

Increased femoral anteversion (common cause of in-toeing in 3-6 year olds)

Diagnostic Accuracy

Sensitivity88%

Ability to detect true positives

Specificity85%

Ability to exclude false positives

Thigh-Foot Angle

Assess tibial torsion

Technique

  1. 1Child prone, knees flexed to 90°
  2. 2View foot from above
  3. 3Measure angle between thigh axis and foot axis
Positive Sign

Negative angle (foot points inward relative to thigh)

Indicates

Internal tibial torsion (common cause of in-toeing in 1-3 year olds)

Diagnostic Accuracy

Sensitivity85%

Ability to detect true positives

Specificity80%

Ability to exclude false positives

Leg Length Discrepancy

LLD Assessment

True vs Apparent LLD:

  • True LLD: Actual bone length difference
  • Apparent LLD: Pelvic obliquity, contractures

Causes:

  • Congenital: Hemihypertrophy, limb deficiency
  • Acquired: Trauma (growth plate injury), infection, Perthes
  • Neuromuscular: Polio, cerebral palsy

Clinical Significance:

  • Less than 2cm: Often asymptomatic
  • 2-5cm: May need shoe raise
  • Greater than 5cm: Consider surgical equalization

Block Test

Measure leg length discrepancy

Technique

  1. 1Child stands with feet parallel
  2. 2Place measured blocks under short leg
  3. 3Add blocks until pelvis is level (ASIS/PSIS)
Positive Sign

Measured block height indicates LLD

Indicates

True leg length discrepancy if pelvis levels with blocks

Diagnostic Accuracy

Sensitivity90%

Ability to detect true positives

Specificity85%

Ability to exclude false positives

Galeazzi Test

Technique:

  • Child supine, knees flexed, feet flat on bed
  • Compare height of knees

Interpretation:

  • Unequal knee height = LLD
  • Lower knee on shorter side (femoral shortening)
  • Higher tibia on longer side (tibial shortening)

Limitation:

  • Cannot distinguish femur from tibia discrepancy alone
  • Need individual bone measurements

Specific Conditions

conditionagepatternfeaturesaction
Physiological Varus0-2 yearsBilateral, symmetricNormal developmentObserve, reassure
Blount's DiseaseGreater than 2 yearsUnilateral or asymmetricVarus increasing, lateral thrustX-ray, brace or surgery
RicketsAnyBilateral, may be asymmetricMultiple metaphyseal changes, short statureBloods, X-ray, treat cause
Physiological Valgus2-7 yearsBilateral, symmetricMaximum at 4 years, improvingObserve, reassure
Pathological ValgusGreater than 8 years or progressiveMay be unilateralIM distance greater than 8cm, progressiveInvestigate underlying cause
Key Concept

Blount's Disease (Tibia Vara):

  • Progressive varus after age 2
  • Due to growth disturbance of medial proximal tibial physis
  • Infantile type: 1-3 years, often bilateral, obese
  • Adolescent type: 8+ years, unilateral, obese
  • Drennan angle greater than 16° on X-ray = likely progressive
  • Treatment: Bracing (early), osteotomy (progressive)

Gait Observation

Walking Assessment

Observe:

  • Foot progression angle
  • Knee alignment during stance
  • Lateral thrust (suggests lateral compartment overload)
  • Trendelenburg (hip pathology)
  • Circumduction (LLD, stiff joint)

Running:

  • May exaggerate rotational abnormalities
  • In-toeing often more apparent
  • Note any falls or clumsiness

Stairs (if age appropriate):

  • Reciprocal pattern expected by 3-4 years
  • Difficulty may suggest weakness

Summary Presentation

VIVA SCENARIOStandard

Presenting Your Findings

EXAMINER

"18-month-old child brought by parents concerned about 'bow-legs' - worried child will never walk normally."

KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Physiological varus is normal until age 2
Bilateral symmetric deformity is reassuring
Intercondylar distance up to 6cm is acceptable
Look for red flags: asymmetry, progression, short stature
COMMON TRAPS
✗Ordering unnecessary X-rays for physiological varus
✗Missing unilateral or asymmetric deformity
✗Forgetting to assess rotational profile
✗Not examining hips (LLD, developmental dysplasia)

Examination Sequence

Systematic Approach

  1. Observe standing: Overall alignment, symmetry
  2. Measure angular: Intercondylar or intermalleolar distance
  3. Observe gait: Foot progression angle, lateral thrust
  4. Prone examination: Hip rotation, thigh-foot angle
  5. Supine examination: Hip ROM, Galeazzi test, foot shape
  6. Block test: Leg length discrepancy if suspected
  7. Joint examination: Knee, hip, ankle - stability and ROM
  8. General: Height, features of syndromes, skin (cafe-au-lait)
  9. Compare sides: Always look for asymmetry
  10. Document: Measurements, diagram, comparison with normal values

Examiner Tips

Scoring High in Lower Limb Alignment Examination

High-Yield Exam Summary

Do

  • •Know normal developmental milestones
  • •Measure and document (ICD, IMD, thigh-foot angle)
  • •Assess both angular and rotational alignment
  • •Look for red flags (asymmetry, progression, short stature)
  • •Reassure appropriately for physiological variants

Don't

  • •Order X-rays for bilateral symmetric physiological variants
  • •Miss features of skeletal dysplasia or rickets
  • •Forget to assess gait and look for lateral thrust
  • •Ignore parental concerns - explain the normal development
  • •Fail to arrange appropriate follow-up
Quick Reference
Time Allocation5 min
Joint/RegionLower Limb
Typecomprehensive
Updated2025-12-26
Examination Framework
  • Look - Inspection
  • Feel - Palpation
  • Move - ROM & Power
  • Special Tests
  • Neurovascular
Tags
paediatric
alignment
genu-varum
genu-valgum
in-toeing
leg-length
Related Examinations
  • gait analysis
  • hip comprehensive