Anterior Cervical Corpectomy and Fusion

SpineAdvancedCore Procedure

Anterior Cervical Corpectomy and Fusion

Surgical technique guide for anterior cervical corpectomy and strut reconstruction for multilevel retrovertebral cord compression — Smith-Robinson approach, vertebral body resection, strut grafting or expandable cage, anterior plating, and multilevel considerations

High-yield overview

Multilevel retrovertebral decompression with strut reconstruction and anterior plating | advanced

Surgical Imaging

Critical Danger Structures and Exam Traps
Recurrent Laryngeal Nerve — Right vs Left Approach

The trap: Assuming the nerve is equally safe on both sides. On the right the nerve loops around the subclavian and ascends more obliquely, crossing the field at C5-C6; on the left it loops around the aortic arch and is more protected in the tracheoesophageal groove.

The fix: For C6-C7 and below, a left-sided approach is often preferred. Identify the nerve by blunt dissection medial to the carotid sheath and lateral to the trachea; if the nerve is encountered, gently mobilise it medially with the trachea.

Vertebral Artery — Lateral Limit of Decompression

Location: The vertebral artery ascends through the transverse foramina, lying approximately 1.5-2 cm lateral to the uncovertebral joint line at C3-C6. It is vulnerable during aggressive lateral osteophyte removal or when the lateral border of the posterior longitudinal ligament is breached.

Risk: Arterial injury causes massive bleeding and potential posterior circulation stroke. Never extend lateral decompression beyond the lateral edge of the posterior longitudinal ligament; use the uncovertebral joints as the safe lateral landmark.

Oesophagus and Trachea — Retraction Injury

Location: The oesophagus lies immediately medial to the carotid sheath; the trachea is slightly more midline. Both are retracted medially with a blunt retractor or hand-held blade.

Risk: Perforation from sharp retractors or thermal injury from electrocautery. A delayed oesophageal perforation presents with neck swelling, crepitus, fever and mediastinitis — a surgical emergency.

Dura and Spinal Cord — Posterior Longitudinal Ligament Breach

Location: The posterior longitudinal ligament is the final layer before the dura. In OPLL or severe stenosis the ligament may be ossified and adherent to dura; in burst fractures the posterior wall fragments may have lacerated the dura.

Risk: Dural tear, CSF leak, or direct cord injury. Always confirm the plane between ligament and dura with a fine instrument before dividing; have dural repair materials ready.

Graft or Cage Dislodgement — Early Mechanical Failure

Why it happens: Inadequate endplate preparation, undersized graft, over-distraction, or insufficient plate fixation. Multilevel corpectomies without posterior supplementation have higher failure rates.

Prevention and recognition: Achieve 1-2 mm distraction, confirm endplate bleeding, use a plate that spans at least one level above and below, and consider posterior instrumentation for three or more levels. Early dislodgement presents with sudden dysphagia or recurrent myelopathy.

Pseudarthrosis versus Hardware Failure

The distinction: Pseudarthrosis is a biological failure of fusion (greater than 1 mm motion at 1 year on dynamic radiographs or CT); hardware failure (plate or screw breakage) is a mechanical consequence of excessive motion or poor biology.

Management implication: Isolated pseudarthrosis without symptoms may be observed; symptomatic pseudarthrosis or hardware failure usually requires revision anterior or posterior fusion with autograft.

Mnemonic

C.O.R.P.E.C.T.CORPECTOMY — Core Principles

Mnemonic

D.E.C.O.M.P.DECOMPRESSION — Stepwise Vertebral Body Removal

Mnemonic

F.U.S.I.O.N.FUSION — Reconstruction Principles

Surgical Indications

Absolute Indications

  • Multilevel retrovertebral cord compression from large central disc-osteophyte complexes that cannot be addressed by discectomy alone
  • Ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) spanning one or more vertebral bodies with myelopathy
  • Cervical burst fracture with retropulsed posterior wall fragment causing cord compression
  • Primary or metastatic tumour involving the vertebral body with neurological deficit or instability
  • Pyogenic or tuberculous spondylodiscitis with vertebral body destruction and abscess causing cord compression

Relative Indications

  • Progressive cervical myelopathy with imaging evidence of retrovertebral pathology
  • Failed anterior cervical discectomy and fusion at an adjacent level with new retrovertebral compression
  • Kyphotic deformity secondary to vertebral body collapse requiring anterior column reconstruction

Contraindications

Absolute:

  • Active systemic infection unrelated to the spine
  • Severe untreated medical comorbidities precluding anterior cervical surgery
  • Inability to tolerate prone positioning for supplemental posterior surgery when required

Relative:

  • Previous anterior cervical surgery with extensive scarring (consider posterior approach or staged procedure)
  • Isolated radiculopathy without myelopathy (ACDF usually sufficient)
  • Poor bone quality precluding reliable screw fixation (consider posterior-only approach)

Evidence for Anterior Corpectomy

When Discectomy Is Insufficient

  • Retrovertebral pathology (central osteophytes, OPLL, burst fragments) lies behind the vertebral body and cannot be reached through disc spaces alone
  • Attempting to remove such pathology through a discectomy risks incomplete decompression and persistent myelopathy
  • Corpectomy provides direct visualisation of the entire posterior longitudinal ligament across the affected levels

Reconstruction Options and Outcomes

  • Structural autograft (fibula or iliac crest) remains the gold standard with fusion rates greater than 90 percent in single-level corpectomy
  • Expandable cages with osteoinductive packing achieve comparable fusion rates with shorter operative time and no donor-site morbidity
  • Anterior plating alone is sufficient for one- or two-level corpectomy; three or more levels have higher failure rates without posterior supplementation

Multilevel Constructs

  • Two-level corpectomy with anterior plating alone has a 5-10 percent failure rate; adding posterior instrumentation reduces failure to less than 2 percent
  • Three-level corpectomy without posterior support has failure rates exceeding 20 percent in some series; 360-degree stabilisation is strongly recommended

Clinical Decision Scenarios

Practise clinical reasoning and management decisions out loud

Viva scenarioAdvanced
Clinical prompt

A 62-year-old man with progressive cervical myelopathy has MRI and CT showing OPLL from C4 to C6 with greater than 50 percent canal stenosis and cord signal change. He has Nurick grade 3 myelopathy. What is your surgical plan and why?

Practical approach
This patient has multilevel retrovertebral compression from OPLL that cannot be adequately decompressed through discectomy alone. Anterior cervical corpectomy of C5 with strut reconstruction and anterior plating, supplemented by posterior instrumentation, is my preferred approach for two-level OPLL with significant myelopathy. **Rationale for anterior approach**: Direct visualisation and removal of the ossified ligament provides the most reliable decompression of the cord. Posterior laminectomy would decompress the canal but would not remove the anterior pathology and would leave the cord draped over the OPLL. **Why corpectomy rather than skip laminectomy or laminoplasty**: The OPLL spans the C5 body and the posterior longitudinal ligament must be exposed and resected across the full width of the vertebral body. Corpectomy achieves this while allowing reconstruction of the anterior column. **Reconstruction details**: I would perform C4-C6 corpectomy (C5 body removal), reconstruction with an expandable cage packed with autograft or osteoinductive material, and an anterior plate from C4 to C6. Because this is a two-level corpectomy, I would add posterior lateral mass screw fixation from C3 to C7 to reduce the risk of graft dislodgement and pseudarthrosis. **Risk counselling**: I would specifically discuss recurrent laryngeal nerve injury (2-5 percent), vertebral artery injury (less than 1 percent), dural tear (higher in OPLL), dysphagia (common early, 5-10 percent persistent), and the need for possible posterior surgery.
Viva scenarioAdvanced
Clinical prompt

During anterior cervical corpectomy at C5 the high-speed burr suddenly causes profuse bleeding from the right lateral gutter. What is your immediate response and subsequent management?

Practical approach
Profuse bleeding from the lateral gutter during corpectomy is vertebral artery injury until proven otherwise. My immediate response is to tamponade the bleeding with a haemostatic agent and direct pressure while maintaining haemodynamic stability. **Immediate steps**: Do not attempt to clamp or ligate blindly. Pack the area with haemostatic gauze or bone wax, apply gentle pressure with a peanut or cottonoid, and request immediate vascular surgery and interventional neuroradiology consultation. Maintain normotension and transfuse as needed. Obtain an urgent angiogram once the patient is stabilised. **Prevention review**: The bleeding occurred because the decompression extended too far laterally, breaching the uncovertebral joint or the lateral border of the posterior longitudinal ligament. The vertebral artery lies 1.5-2 cm lateral to the uncovertebral joint and must never be exposed. **Subsequent management**: If the angiogram shows a contained injury or pseudoaneurysm, endovascular repair (stent or coil) is preferred. If there is active extravasation or the patient is unstable, open repair or ligation may be required. The patient requires posterior circulation monitoring (CT or MR angiography) and neurological observation for posterior fossa stroke. **Long-term**: If the artery is sacrificed, ensure the contralateral vertebral artery is patent and of adequate calibre. Document the injury thoroughly and counsel the patient about stroke risk.
Viva scenarioAdvanced
Clinical prompt

A 58-year-old woman is 8 weeks post C5 corpectomy and fusion with an expandable cage and anterior plate. She reports sudden onset of severe dysphagia and neck pain after a coughing fit. Lateral radiograph shows anterior displacement of the cage. What is your diagnosis and management?

Practical approach
This is early graft/cage dislodgement, a recognised mechanical complication after corpectomy. The sudden onset after coughing suggests the cage was inadequately seated or the endplates were not adequately prepared, and the coughing episode provided the force to dislodge it. **Immediate assessment**: Obtain urgent CT to confirm the position of the cage, assess for cord compression, and evaluate the plate and screws. Assess the airway and swallow; severe dysphagia with risk of aspiration may require nasogastric feeding or even intubation if the cage has migrated significantly. **Management**: Most cases of early dislodgement require revision surgery. The options are anterior revision (remove the displaced cage, re-prepare the endplates, insert a larger or longer strut or cage, and re-plate) or combined anterior-posterior revision if the construct was already borderline for stability. Posterior instrumentation should be added if it was not performed initially. **Prevention lessons**: This case highlights the importance of precise endplate preparation (complete cartilage removal, bleeding endplates, parallel surfaces), adequate graft length (1-2 mm distraction), and consideration of posterior supplementation for even single-level corpectomy in patients with risk factors for failure (smoking, osteoporosis, coughing or straining post-operatively).
Exam day cheat sheet
Anterior Cervical Corpectomy and Fusion — Exam Day Summary

References

Evidence

Anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion versus discectomy and fusion for the treatment of two-level cervical spondylotic myelopathy: analysis of sagittal balance and axial symptoms

Level II
Zhang Y, Liu H, Yang H, et al.Int Orthop
Clinical implication: For retrovertebral pathology at two levels, corpectomy achieves better alignment and decompression with comparable safety.
Source: International Orthopaedics 2018;42(8):1877-1882
Evidence

Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion versus corpectomy and fusion in treating two-level adjacent cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a minimum 5-year follow-up study

Level III
Liu J, Chen X, Liu Z, et al.Arch Orthop Trauma Surg
Clinical implication: Corpectomy is preferable when retrovertebral compression requires direct visualization and wider decompression.
Source: Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery 2015;135(2):149-153
Evidence

Is anterior cervical discectomy and fusion superior to corpectomy and fusion for treatment of multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy? A systemic review and meta-analysis

Level III
Han YC, Liu ZQ, Wang SJ, et al.PLoS One
Clinical implication: When retrovertebral pathology spans vertebral bodies, corpectomy offers more effective decompression than multi-level discectomy.
Source: PLoS One 2014;9(1):e87191
Evidence

The effectiveness of reducing endotracheal cuff pressure after retractor placement to decrease postoperative laryngeal dysfunction in anterior cervical surgery: a meta-analysis

Level III
Miller A, et al.J Neurosurg Spine
Clinical implication: Intraoperative cuff pressure management is a simple, effective strategy to reduce recurrent laryngeal nerve morbidity in anterior cervical procedures.
Source: Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine 2022;37(1):21-30

Editorially reviewed — transparent references and correction processPublished by OrthoVellum Medical Education TeamEditorial boardMethodologyReview policy
Educational disclosure

Educational content is reviewed for source visibility, editorial coherence, and correction readiness.

No individual clinician credential is claimed unless a named person is shown.

Verify before clinical use; this is not medical advice or a substitute for local guidance.