Boyd Approach to the Proximal Radius and Ulna

Hand & WristAdvancedCore Procedure

Boyd Approach to the Proximal Radius and Ulna

Comprehensive operative guide to the Boyd posterolateral approach to the proximal radius and ulna - indications for Monteggia fixation and radial head arthroplasty, PIN protection via subperiosteal ulnar flap, radioulnar synostosis risk, and surgical steps for FRCS/FRACS/EBOT/ABOS exams

High-yield overview

Posterolateral | PIN Protection via Ulnar Flap | Monteggia and Radial Head Access

Surgical Imaging

Critical Boyd Approach Exam Points
PIN Protection Technique

The posterior interosseous nerve enters the supinator approximately 1 cm distal to the radial head. The Boyd approach protects it by subperiosteal elevation of the supinator origin from the ulna as part of a single flap with anconeus, reflecting the muscle mass radially with the nerve inside it. Never dissect within the supinator muscle itself.

Radioulnar Synostosis Risk

Heterotopic ossification and radioulnar synostosis occur in up to 5-10 percent of cases if the interosseous membrane or periosteum is stripped from both the ulna and radius, creating a bridge for bone formation. Meticulous subperiosteal technique on the ulna only, avoidance of haematoma in the interosseous space, and early mobilisation reduce this risk.

Positioning Options

Lateral decubitus with arm supported on a padded bolster or supine with arm across the chest are standard. Prone is rarely used. The C-arm must be positioned to obtain true AP and lateral views of the radial head and neck without obstruction from the table.

Indications for Boyd

Primary uses include Monteggia fracture-dislocation fixation, radial head ORIF or arthroplasty, annular ligament reconstruction, and complex proximal ulna fractures with radial head involvement. It is the approach of choice when simultaneous access to the proximal radius and ulna is required.

Danger Structures by Layer

Superficial: lateral cutaneous nerve of forearm branches. Deep: posterior interosseous nerve within supinator (protected by flap technique). Vessels: radial recurrent artery may require ligation. Joint: annular ligament must be preserved or repaired for stability.

Extension Principles

Proximal extension along the lateral border of triceps allows olecranon visualisation. Distal extension follows the subcutaneous ulnar border for ulnar shaft access. Do not cross the interosseous space to the radius at any level to avoid synostosis.

At a Glance

The Boyd approach is a posterolateral exposure of the proximal radius and ulna that utilises a single subperiosteal flap containing anconeus and the origin of supinator to protect the posterior interosseous nerve while providing access to the radial head, radial neck, annular ligament and proximal ulna. It is the classic approach for Monteggia fracture-dislocations, radial head fractures requiring replacement or complex fixation, and annular ligament reconstruction. The key principle is staying strictly subperiosteal on the ulna and reflecting the entire muscle mass radially rather than dissecting within the supinator. This keeps the PIN safe within the reflected flap. The major long-term complication is radioulnar synostosis, which is minimised by avoiding any periosteal stripping on the radial side of the ulna or ulnar side of the radius and by meticulous haemostasis.

Mnemonic

BOYD SAFEBOYD APPROACH - Surgical Steps

Hook:BOYD SAFE - subperiosteal flap protects the PIN every time!

Mnemonic

PIN SAFEPIN Protection - Boyd Principles

Hook:PIN SAFE - the subperiosteal ulnar flap is the key to nerve protection!

Mnemonic

NO BRIDGESynostosis Prevention

Hook:NO BRIDGE - never create a pathway for radioulnar synostosis!

Indications and Approach Selection

Primary Indications:

  • Monteggia fracture-dislocations (Bado types I-IV) requiring ulnar fixation and radial head reduction
  • Radial head fractures (Mason III/IV or comminuted) needing ORIF or arthroplasty
  • Annular ligament reconstruction or repair in chronic Monteggia or radial head instability
  • Complex proximal ulna fractures with associated radial head or neck injury
  • Revision surgery for failed radial head fixation or malunited Monteggia

Why This Approach is Chosen:

The Boyd approach allows simultaneous exposure of the proximal ulna and the radial head/neck through a single posterolateral incision. The subperiosteal flap technique protects the posterior interosseous nerve without requiring its formal identification or dissection. It is the standard approach when both the ulna and radius proximally must be accessed, particularly in Monteggia injuries where the ulnar fracture and radial head dislocation are addressed together.

Contraindications:

  • Active infection over the proposed incision
  • Severe soft tissue compromise requiring alternative exposure
  • Isolated radial head fracture accessible through Kocher or Kaplan approach (less invasive)
  • Patient factors precluding lateral positioning

Alternative Approaches:

  • Kocher approach: Between anconeus and ECU for isolated radial head exposure - less extensile
  • Kaplan approach: Between EDC and ECU - more anterior, good for radial head but limited ulnar access
  • Anterior (Henry) approach: For radial shaft or when PIN needs formal exploration
  • Posterior (Thompson) approach: For radial shaft distal to supinator

Overview

Definition

Boyd Approach provides posterolateral access to the proximal radius and ulna by reflecting a single subperiosteal flap containing anconeus and supinator origin from the ulna, thereby protecting the posterior interosseous nerve within the reflected muscle mass.

Key Characteristics:

  • Incision along subcutaneous border of ulna
  • Subperiosteal elevation from ulna only
  • PIN remains safe inside the flap
  • Excellent exposure of radial head, neck and annular ligament
  • Risk of radioulnar synostosis if technique violated
Clinical Significance

Why This Approach Matters:

  • Gold standard for Monteggia fracture-dislocations
  • Allows radial head arthroplasty or complex ORIF with ulnar fixation
  • PIN injury rate less than 5 percent when subperiosteal technique followed
  • Radioulnar synostosis is the most feared long-term complication
  • Essential knowledge for upper limb trauma viva and operative surgery stations

Exam Relevance:

  • High-yield surgical approach for FRCS/FRACS/EBOT/ABOS
  • PIN protection mechanism is a classic examiner question

Anatomy

Bony Anatomy:

The proximal ulna forms the greater sigmoid notch articulating with the trochlea. The radial head is a cylindrical structure articulating with the capitellum and the proximal radioulnar joint. The annular ligament encircles the radial head and attaches to the anterior and posterior margins of the radial notch of the ulna. The radial neck lies distal to the head and is a common site of fracture in children and adults.

Muscular Layers:

|| Layer | Muscle | Nerve Supply | Action | ||-------|--------|--------------|--------| || Superficial | Anconeus | Radial nerve | Elbow extension, stabilises joint | || Superficial | Extensor carpi ulnaris | Posterior interosseous | Wrist extension, ulnar deviation | || Deep | Supinator | Posterior interosseous | Forearm supination | || Deep | Common extensor origin | Radial/PIN | Wrist and finger extension |

Neurovascular Anatomy:

|| Structure | Location | Clinical Significance | ||-----------|----------|----------------------| || Posterior interosseous nerve | Enters supinator 1 cm distal to radial head | MOST IMPORTANT - motor to extensors; protected by subperiosteal flap | || Radial nerve | Lies in spiral groove proximally | Not at risk in Boyd approach | || Radial recurrent artery | Arises just distal to elbow | May require ligation during deep dissection | || Ulnar nerve | Posterior to medial epicondyle | Not at risk unless medial extension | || Lateral cutaneous nerve of forearm | Superficial sensory branches | Risk of neuroma if superficial dissection injures branches |

Internervous Plane:

The classical interval is between anconeus (radial nerve) and extensor carpi ulnaris (posterior interosseous nerve). However, the safety of the Boyd approach relies on the subperiosteal elevation of both muscles' origin from the ulna as a single flap rather than true internervous dissection within the interval.

Positioning and Patient Setup

Position: Lateral Decubitus or Supine with Arm Across Chest

Pre-positioning Checklist:

  • Confirm no contraindication to lateral positioning (shoulder pathology, spinal instability)
  • Arm board or padded bolster positioned for elbow support
  • C-arm available with unobstructed access to AP and lateral projections of radial head
  • Tourniquet applied high on arm if planned
  • Preparation of both upper limbs if bone graft or contralateral comparison required

Positioning Details:

  • Lateral decubitus with affected arm supported on padded arm board or bolster, elbow flexed 90 degrees
  • Supine alternative: arm placed across the chest with shoulder internally rotated and elbow flexed
  • Tourniquet applied high on the arm, exsanguination before inflation
  • Skin preparation from axilla to wrist, including hand for intraoperative rotation assessment
Positioning Risks

Lateral positioning risks include brachial plexus stretch, pressure injury to dependent arm, and compartment syndrome if tourniquet time is prolonged. Document all protective measures and limit tourniquet time to less than 120 minutes when possible.

Alternative Positioning:

  • Supine with arm across chest is widely used and allows easy conversion to anterior approaches if needed
  • Prone position is rarely required and limits C-arm access

Surface Anatomy and Landmarks

Key Bony Landmarks:

  • Olecranon process - most prominent posterior landmark
  • Lateral epicondyle - origin of common extensor tendon
  • Radial head - palpable anterior to lateral epicondyle with forearm rotation
  • Subcutaneous border of ulna - palpable along entire length

Key Soft Tissue Landmarks:

  • Anconeus triangle - bounded by olecranon, lateral epicondyle and radial head
  • Common extensor origin - palpable ridge on lateral epicondyle
  • Ulnar nerve - palpable posterior to medial epicondyle (not directly in field)

Incision Planning:

  • Longitudinal incision along the subcutaneous border of the ulna
  • Start 2-3 cm proximal to olecranon tip if proximal extension needed
  • Extend distally along ulnar border as far as required (typically 8-12 cm)
  • Centre the incision over the radial head for isolated radial head work

Surgical Technique

Patient Positioning

Lateral decubitus with arm on padded bolster or supine with arm across chest. Elbow flexed 90 degrees. Tourniquet high on arm. C-arm positioned for true AP (forearm neutral) and lateral (forearm in neutral or slight supination) views of the radial head. Mark the olecranon, lateral epicondyle, radial head and subcutaneous ulnar border before skin preparation.

Surface Landmarks

The incision follows the subcutaneous ulnar border from just proximal to the olecranon distally. The anconeus triangle (olecranon-lateral epicondyle-radial head) is outlined. The interval between anconeus and ECU is palpated as a soft spot distal to the lateral epicondyle.

Exam Viva Scenarios

Practise clinical reasoning and management decisions out loud

Viva scenarioStandard
Scenario 1: Monteggia Fracture-Dislocation
Clinical prompt

A 35-year-old falls from a height onto an outstretched hand and presents with a displaced proximal ulna fracture and radial head dislocation. CT confirms Bado type I Monteggia injury. Describe your surgical approach and key steps.

Practical approach
Assessment begins with ATLS principles, full neurovascular examination including posterior interosseous nerve function (finger and wrist extension), and soft tissue evaluation. Plain radiographs (AP and lateral elbow, forearm views) are supplemented by CT to define ulnar comminution and radial head fracture pattern. The Boyd approach is selected because it provides simultaneous access to the ulnar fracture and the radial head through a single incision while protecting the PIN via the subperiosteal flap technique. Position the patient lateral or supine with the arm across the chest. Make a longitudinal incision along the subcutaneous ulnar border centred over the radial head. Develop the interval between anconeus and extensor carpi ulnaris. Elevate the common origin of anconeus and supinator subperiosteally from the ulna as a single flap and reflect it radially. This exposes the radial head and protects the PIN within the flap. Reduce and fix the ulnar fracture first (usually with a posterior plate), then reduce the radial head. Repair or reconstruct the annular ligament if unstable. Reattach the flap securely on closure. Document PIN function postoperatively.
Viva scenarioStandard
Scenario 2: Comminuted Radial Head Fracture
Clinical prompt

A 48-year-old sustains a comminuted radial head fracture (Mason type III) after a fall. CT shows greater than three fragments with significant articular comminution. Discuss your choice of approach and key operative considerations for radial head arthroplasty.

Practical approach
Full history, examination for associated injuries (especially medial collateral ligament and distal radioulnar joint), and neurovascular assessment including PIN function are essential. CT defines fragment number, size, and articular involvement. For comminuted fractures with greater than three fragments or significant articular damage, radial head arthroplasty is preferred over ORIF. The Boyd approach provides excellent exposure of the radial head and neck while protecting the PIN. Position the patient lateral or supine with arm across chest. Use a longitudinal posterolateral incision along the ulnar border. Develop the anconeus-ECU interval and elevate the anconeus-supinator origin subperiosteally from the ulna as a single flap reflected radially. This exposes the radial head and neck without endangering the PIN. Excise the radial head fragments, prepare the radial neck, and implant the prosthesis ensuring correct sizing and height to restore radiocapitellar contact. Repair the annular ligament if divided. Reattach the flap securely. Early motion is encouraged unless ligament repair requires protection.
Viva scenarioChallenging
Scenario 3: Radioulnar Synostosis Concern
Clinical prompt

A 29-year-old labourer undergoes Boyd approach for a complex Monteggia injury with radial head fracture. Six months later he has complete loss of forearm rotation. CT confirms radioulnar synostosis. What went wrong and how could it have been prevented?

Practical approach
Radioulnar synostosis is a devastating complication causing complete loss of pronation-supination. In this case the most likely technical error was violation of the subperiosteal principle, with periosteal stripping or haematoma formation bridging the interosseous space between the ulna and radius. Prevention requires strict adherence to subperiosteal elevation on the ulna only, never stripping the radial periosteum, meticulous haemostasis in the interosseous space, thorough irrigation to remove bone debris, and avoidance of aggressive retraction that crushes interosseous tissue. High-risk patients (young males, high-energy injuries, extensive dissection) may benefit from early NSAID use for heterotopic ossification prophylaxis. Once synostosis is established, treatment is surgical excision after maturation (usually 6-12 months) with interposition material (fat, fascia, or synthetic) and immediate postoperative motion, often with radiation or NSAID prophylaxis.
Exam day cheat sheet
BOYD APPROACH TO THE PROXIMAL RADIUS AND ULNA

References

Evidence

Surgical Treatment of Monteggia-Like Lesions With a Modified Boyd Approach

LoE 3
Kokkalis ZT et al
Clinical implication: Supports the modified Boyd approach as effective for complex proximal forearm Monteggia variants
Source: J Shoulder Elb Arthroplast 2023;7:24715492231196622
Evidence

The Boyd approach: a valuable alternative to treating simple to complex elbow fractures and dislocations

LoE 3
Ayala AE et al
Clinical implication: Confirms the Boyd approach as a versatile and safe option for proximal forearm pathology
Source: J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2023 Dec;32(12):2590-2598
Evidence

Posterior (Boyd) approach to terrible triad injuries

LoE 3
Carroll PJ et al
Clinical implication: Demonstrates the Boyd approach utility in complex elbow fracture-dislocations requiring multi-structure access
Source: JSES Int 2022 Mar;6(2):315-320
Evidence

The Boyd Interval: A Modification for Use in the Management of Elbow Trauma

LoE 3
Robinson PM et al
Clinical implication: Provides practical technical refinements to the classic Boyd approach for contemporary trauma practice
Source: Tech Hand Up Extrem Surg 2016 Mar;20(1):37-41
Editorially reviewed — transparent references and correction processPublished by OrthoVellum Medical Education TeamEditorial boardMethodologyReview policy
Educational disclosure

Educational content is reviewed for source visibility, editorial coherence, and correction readiness.

No individual clinician credential is claimed unless a named person is shown.

Verify before clinical use; this is not medical advice or a substitute for local guidance.