Brachial Plexus Exploration and Reconstruction

TraumaAdvancedCore Procedure

Brachial Plexus Exploration and Reconstruction

Operative technique for exploration and reconstruction of traumatic brachial plexus injuries — supraclavicular and infraclavicular approaches, root avulsion versus rupture differentiation, nerve grafting, and transfers including spinal accessory, Oberlin, and intercostal procedures

High-yield overview

Supraclavicular and infraclavicular exploration, avulsion versus rupture differentiation, grafting and transfers | advanced

Surgical Imaging

Critical Danger Structures and Exam Traps
Preganglionic Avulsion versus Postganglionic Rupture

The trap: Assuming every flail arm is graftable — root avulsion produces no proximal stump and grafting fails.

The fix: MRI pseudomeningoceles, preserved SNAPs despite anaesthesia, absent paraspinal and serratus EMG activity confirm avulsion. These require transfers, not grafts. Always obtain EMG and MRI before exploration.

Subclavian Vessel Control

Location: The subclavian artery and vein lie immediately anterior and inferior to the lower trunk and divisions in the supraclavicular fossa.

Risk: Uncontrolled bleeding from vessel laceration during plexus dissection can be rapidly fatal. Proximal and distal control with vessel loops must be obtained before any plexus manipulation.

Phrenic Nerve Identification

Location: The phrenic nerve runs on the anterior scalene muscle surface, medial and deep to the C5 and C6 roots.

Risk: Division of the phrenic produces permanent hemidiaphragm paralysis. Identify it by its oblique course and respiratory contraction before dividing scalene; protect throughout supraclavicular exposure.

Spinal Accessory Nerve Donor Morbidity

Location: The spinal accessory nerve is identified at the posterior border of sternocleidomastoid, 2-3 cm above the clavicle.

Risk: Complete harvest produces shoulder droop and scapular winging. Use only the distal branch to trapezius; leave the proximal branch to upper trapezius intact to minimise donor deficit.

Ulnar Nerve Fascicle Selection in Oberlin Transfer

Location: The ulnar nerve at the upper arm level contains motor fascicles to FCU and FDP; the largest and most redundant fascicle is selected for transfer to biceps.

Risk: Harvesting the wrong fascicle produces permanent ulnar intrinsic weakness. Intraoperative stimulation confirms the fascicle produces strong wrist flexion without finger abduction or adduction before division.

Late Exploration after 9 Months

Location: Motor endplates degenerate 12-18 months after denervation; reinnervation after this window has low success.

Risk: Operating after 9 months on a closed injury risks futile exploration with poor functional return. Document time since injury and consider palliative tendon transfers or arthrodesis if beyond the window.

Mnemonic

A.V.U.L.S.E.AVULSE — Preganglionic versus Postganglionic Differentiation

Mnemonic

R.E.P.A.I.R.REPAIR — Reconstructive Priorities and Options

Mnemonic

S.U.P.R.A.SUPRA — Supraclavicular Exposure Landmarks

Surgical Indications

Timing of Exploration

  • Sharp or penetrating injury: explore within days to 2 weeks — primary repair or early grafting possible before retraction
  • Closed traction injury without recovery: explore at 3 to 6 months — allows time for neurapraxia resolution while remaining within reinnervation window
  • Complete flail arm with imaging and EMG confirming avulsion: proceed to exploration and transfer planning at 3 months
  • Progressive neurological deficit or expanding haematoma: urgent exploration regardless of mechanism

Absolute Indications

  • Traumatic root avulsion confirmed by pseudomeningoceles, preserved SNAPs, and paraspinal denervation
  • Postganglionic rupture with no clinical or electrodiagnostic recovery by 3-6 months
  • Associated vascular injury requiring repair with plexus exploration

Relative Indications

  • Incomplete recovery with plateau on serial examinations and EMG
  • Patient desire for reconstruction after informed discussion of realistic outcomes and donor morbidity
  • Paediatric brachial plexus palsy failing to show spontaneous recovery by 3-6 months

Contraindications

Absolute:

  • Life-threatening associated injuries precluding prolonged anaesthesia
  • Complete motor endplate degeneration beyond 18-24 months with no viable targets
  • Patient refusal or inability to comply with postoperative rehabilitation

Relative:

  • Isolated neurapraxia expected to recover spontaneously (serial EMG shows improving conduction)
  • Poor donor nerve availability or medical comorbidities increasing surgical risk

Evidence Base

Timing and Outcomes

  • Early exploration (less than 3 months) for closed injuries risks operating on neurapraxia that would recover; delayed exploration beyond 6-9 months yields poorer axon regeneration due to endplate fibrosis
  • Nerve transfer success for elbow flexion (Oberlin) reaches 80-95 percent MRC grade 3 or better when performed within 6 months
  • Intercostal nerve transfers achieve useful elbow flexion in 60-75 percent of cases but with higher donor-site morbidity

Graft versus Transfer

  • Sural nerve grafting of postganglionic ruptures restores shoulder and elbow function in 60-80 percent when gaps are short and repair is tension-free
  • Root avulsions require transfers because no proximal stump exists; spinal accessory to suprascapular and Oberlin transfers are the workhorse procedures with the strongest evidence

Clinical Decision Scenarios

Practise clinical reasoning and management decisions out loud

Viva scenarioAdvanced
Clinical prompt

A 28-year-old man is referred 4 months after a motorcycle accident with a flail left arm. MRI shows pseudomeningoceles at C6, C7, and C8. EMG demonstrates preserved median and ulnar SNAPs, absent paraspinal and serratus activity, and no motor unit potentials. How do you classify the injury and plan reconstruction?

Practical approach
This is a preganglionic root avulsion injury at C6-C8. Preserved SNAPs despite complete anaesthesia, pseudomeningoceles, and paraspinal plus serratus denervation confirm the lesion is proximal to the dorsal root ganglion — no proximal stump exists for grafting. **Reconstructive plan**: I would proceed to exploration at 4-6 months to confirm avulsion intraoperatively and perform nerve transfers. Priorities: spinal accessory to suprascapular for shoulder stability and external rotation, Oberlin ulnar fascicle to biceps for elbow flexion, and intercostal transfers if additional donors are required for hand reinnervation. I would harvest sural nerves as backup in case any postganglionic elements prove graftable. **Counselling**: I would explain that root avulsions have poorer prognosis than ruptures, that recovery will be partial, and that donor morbidity from transfers is expected but minimised by selective harvest. Multiple procedures and 18-24 months of rehabilitation are anticipated.
Viva scenarioAdvanced
Clinical prompt

You are exploring a brachial plexus 5 months after closed traction injury. Intraoperative stimulation of C5 and C6 produces no distal contraction, MRI showed pseudomeningoceles, and the patient has complete anaesthesia in C6 distribution with intact median SNAP. What is your diagnosis and next step?

Practical approach
This confirms preganglionic C5-C6 avulsion. No response to stimulation, pseudomeningoceles, and preserved SNAPs with anaesthesia are diagnostic. There is no proximal stump for grafting. **Next step**: I would proceed with nerve transfers rather than grafting. Spinal accessory to suprascapular transfer for shoulder abduction and external rotation, and Oberlin ulnar fascicle to biceps transfer for elbow flexion. I would also explore the infraclavicular plexus to assess the state of the axillary and musculocutaneous nerves for possible grafting if any postganglionic continuity exists. **Rationale**: Transfers bypass the avulsion level and provide a new source of axons closer to the target muscle, maximising the chance of reinnervation within the 12-18 month motor endplate window.
Viva scenarioAdvanced
Clinical prompt

During supraclavicular exploration you inadvertently divide the phrenic nerve. The patient is stable but you recognise the error intraoperatively. What do you do?

Practical approach
Immediate recognition and repair is critical. I would perform primary microsurgical repair of the phrenic nerve under the operating microscope with 9-0 or 10-0 nylon epineurial sutures, ensuring no tension. I would document the injury and repair thoroughly in the operative note. **Postoperative management**: I would obtain a chest radiograph in recovery to assess hemidiaphragm position and involve respiratory physiotherapy early. I would counsel the patient that phrenic repair has variable recovery and that permanent hemidiaphragm paralysis remains possible despite repair. **Prevention for future cases**: I would reinforce the habit of identifying and looping the phrenic nerve before any scalene division and would consider intraoperative nerve monitoring if available.
Exam day cheat sheet
Brachial Plexus Exploration and Reconstruction — Exam Day Summary

References

Evidence

Nerve transfer to biceps muscle using a part of ulnar nerve for C5-C6 avulsion of the brachial plexus: anatomical study and report of four cases.

Level III
Oberlin C, Béal D, Leechavengvongs S, Salon A, Dauge MC, Sarcy JJ
Clinical implication: Revolutionised elbow flexion reconstruction in upper trunk avulsions; remains the most commonly performed transfer.
Source: J Hand Surg Am 1994;19(2):232-7
Evidence

Intercostal nerve transfer of the musculocutaneous nerve in avulsed brachial plexus injuries: evaluation of 66 patients.

Level III
Chuang DC, Yeh MC, Wei FC
Clinical implication: Expanded the donor pool for patients with multiple root avulsions and limited options.
Source: J Hand Surg Am 1992;17(5):822-8
Evidence

Spinal accessory neurotization for restoration of elbow flexion in avulsion injuries of the brachial plexus.

Level III
Songcharoen P, Mahaisavariya B, Chotigavanich C
Clinical implication: Established spinal accessory transfer as a valuable option for elbow reconstruction in avulsion injuries.
Source: J Hand Surg Am 1996;21(3):387-90
Evidence

Double Nerve Transfer Versus Triple Nerve Transfer for Elbow Flexion Restoration in C5-C6 Traumatic Brachial Plexus Injuries.

Level III
Kamrani RS, Hozhabrbayan M, Mirzaei K, Alitaleshi H, Ghorban Sarvi D, Mossavarali S
Clinical implication: Supports the use of multiple nerve transfers to optimise elbow flexion recovery in upper trunk injuries.
Source: Arch Bone Jt Surg 2026;14(3):179-184

Editorially reviewed — transparent references and correction processPublished by OrthoVellum Medical Education TeamEditorial boardMethodologyReview policy
Educational disclosure

Educational content is reviewed for source visibility, editorial coherence, and correction readiness.

No individual clinician credential is claimed unless a named person is shown.

Verify before clinical use; this is not medical advice or a substitute for local guidance.