Bryan-Morrey (Triceps-Reflecting) Approach to the Elbow

Shoulder & ElbowAdvancedCore Procedure

Bryan-Morrey (Triceps-Reflecting) Approach to the Elbow

Comprehensive guide to the Bryan-Morrey medial-to-lateral triceps-reflecting approach to the elbow for total elbow arthroplasty and distal humeral reconstruction - posterior incision, ulnar nerve identification and transposition, subperiosteal reflection of the extensor mechanism in continuity, wide exposure of the distal humerus and elbow joint, and secure transosseous triceps reattachment for advanced orthopaedic practice and advanced orthopaedic practice

High-yield overview

Posterior incision with the ulnar nerve transposed and the extensor mechanism reflected medial-to-lateral in continuity β€” the workhorse exposure for linked total elbow arthroplasty and distal humeral reconstruction.

Lateral decubitusStandard position for TEA
Medial-to-lateralDirection of triceps reflection
Ulnar nerveCritical at-risk structure, usually transposed
TransosseousCruciate reattachment prevents triceps failure
Critical Must-Knows
  • Posterior (posteromedial) incision passing just medial to the olecranon tip and curving onto the radial side of the proximal ulna.
  • Ulnar nerve is identified, mobilised, protected throughout and usually anteriorly transposed at closure.
  • No true internervous plane - the triceps and anconeus are both radial-nerve structures, reflected subperiosteally off bone.
  • Extensor mechanism reflected medial to lateral in continuity (triceps, anconeus and forearm fascia) is the defining step.
  • Secure transosseous (cruciate) triceps reattachment through the olecranon prevents triceps insufficiency.

When & Why

What it exposes. The Bryan-Morrey approach gives an extensile, wide and reproducible exposure of the entire distal humerus, the olecranon fossa and the elbow joint while preserving the continuity of the extensor mechanism. By reflecting the triceps insertion together with the anconeus and the forearm fascia as a single sleeve from medial to lateral, it allows the elbow to be flexed and dislocated so the distal humerus can be delivered and prepared. Primary indications: - Total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) β€” the workhorse exposure for linked (semiconstrained) elbow replacement in rheumatoid, post-traumatic and degenerative arthritis

  • Complex distal humeral fractures in the elderly β€” particularly the unreconstructable, low, comminuted fracture where primary TEA is planned
  • Distal humeral non-union and reconstruction β€” requiring wide exposure of the articular surface and columns
  • Post-traumatic reconstruction including malunion correction and salvage of failed internal fixation
  • Extra-articular conditions needing broad posterior exposure β€” ankylosis release, excision of heterotopic bone, and resection of selected tumours of the distal humerus Contraindications: - Active infection of the elbow or overlying skin β€” an absolute contraindication to elective arthroplasty
  • Previous ulnar nerve transposition with heavy scarring β€” a relative caution; the nerve must be identified and protected with particular care
  • Compromised posterior skin β€” previous incisions, soft-tissue coverage issues or chronic lymphoedema increase wound breakdown risk
  • High functional demand of the affected limb β€” a relative contraindication to TEA itself (not to the approach), as linked implants tolerate load poorly Position & landmarks. The patient is placed in the lateral decubitus position with the affected arm uppermost, supported over a padded bolster or arm board with the forearm hanging free, so the elbow can be flexed beyond 90 degrees and the field lies horizontal. The supine position with the arm across the chest is an alternative, useful when a simultaneous anterior procedure is needed or in patients who cannot tolerate the lateral position. A sterile tourniquet is applied high on the arm; the limb is exsanguinated and the whole elbow and forearm prepped to allow circumferential handling and full flexion. Bony landmarks are the olecranon tip (the central posterior landmark), the medial epicondyle (common flexor origin and cubital tunnel), the lateral epicondyle (centre of rotation of the elbow) and the radial head; the ulnar nerve is palpable in the groove behind the medial epicondyle and its course mapped before incision. The incision is a straight posterior (posteromedial) skin incision about 15 cm long, passing just medial to the olecranon tip (so the scar avoids the pressure-bearing point and the ulnar nerve is accessible) and curving onto the radial side of the proximal ulna distally. How it compares with the other elbow approaches:
Comparison of Posterior and Lateral Elbow Approaches
ApproachPlane / MethodBest ForKey Drawback
Bryan-Morrey (triceps-reflecting)Subperiosteal reflection of the extensor mechanism medial to lateralTEA; distal humeral reconstructionRisk of triceps insufficiency if reattachment fails
Campbell (triceps-split, V-Y)Midline triceps split, lengthened as a V-YAnkylosis release needing lengtheningDisrupts and weakens the extensor mechanism
Mayo triceps-sparingTriceps left on the olecranon, reflected off the humerusSelected TEA; faster rehabilitationMore limited humeral exposure
Kocher (lateral)True internervous plane: anconeus vs ECURadial head; lateral collateral repairPoor medial-column access
Van Gorder (triceps tongue)Tongue of triceps turned distallyDistal humeral fracturesDevitalises a triceps tongue; weakens extension

The Exposure

Work down through the layers from a posterior incision: identify and protect the ulnar nerve, then reflect the triceps, anconeus and forearm fascia as one continuous sleeve from medial to lateral so the elbow can be flexed and dislocated to deliver the distal humerus.

πŸ“·
Image Needed: Clinical PhotoHigh Priority

Intra-operative photograph of the Bryan-Morrey approach: a posterior incision passing just medial to the olecranon, the ulnar nerve mobilised on a vessel loop, and the extensor mechanism (triceps, anconeus and forearm fascia) reflected laterally as a single sleeve to expose the distal humerus and elbow joint.

Context: A verified image is being sourced for this exposure.

Pending image generation or sourcing

The anatomy that makes the approach work. The distal humerus is triangular distally, forming medial and lateral columns that support the trochlea and capitellum, with the olecranon fossa posteriorly and the coronoid fossa anteriorly. The triceps inserts broadly onto the olecranon and posterior proximal ulna, blending distally with the forearm fascia; the anconeus arises from the lateral epicondyle and lies in continuity with the triceps along the lateral aspect of the olecranon. This muscular continuity is exactly what the approach exploits β€” triceps, anconeus and forearm fascia are swept off the bone together as one sleeve. The centre of rotation of the elbow lies at the centre of the capitellum and trochlea, passing through the lateral epicondyle, and is the landmark for orienting the humeral component of an elbow replacement.

Internervous plane β€” the trap answer

If asked for the internervous plane of the Bryan-Morrey approach, the correct answer is that there is none. The triceps (radial nerve) and anconeus (radial nerve, via the nerve to anconeus) are reflected subperiosteally off the humerus and ulna, so the dissection is subperiosteal and intermuscular rather than internervous, and neither muscle is denervated. This distinguishes it from the Kocher approach, which uses a true internervous plane between the anconeus (radial nerve) and the extensor carpi ulnaris (posterior interosseous nerve).

Exposure sequence

Step 1Position, incision and landmarks
  • Lateral decubitus, affected arm uppermost over a padded support, forearm hanging free so the elbow flexes beyond 90 degrees and the field is horizontal; supine with the arm across the chest is an alternative.
  • Sterile tourniquet high on the arm; exsanguinate and drape for full flexion and circumferential handling.
  • Straight posterior incision about 15 cm long, centred on the elbow, passing just medial to the olecranon tip and curving onto the radial side of the proximal ulna β€” keeping the scar off the olecranon tip and giving early access to the ulnar nerve.
Step 2Identify and mobilise the ulnar nerve first
  • Find the ulnar nerve proximally where it lies behind the medial epicondyle and trace it distally through the cubital tunnel.
  • Release any constricting bands β€” the cubital tunnel retinaculum (Osborne's band) and the fascia between the two heads of flexor carpi ulnaris.
  • Mobilise the nerve gently over a generous length, surround it with a vessel loop, and protect it throughout; never let a retractor press on it.
Step 3Expose the triceps and olecranon
  • Divide the subcutaneous tissue in line with the incision, protecting the medial brachial and antebrachial cutaneous nerves.
  • Develop the plane down to the triceps fascia and the olecranon; clear the posterior surface of the distal humerus and the triceps tendon of overlying tissue.
  • Define the medial border of the triceps where the nerve has been mobilised, ready for the subperiosteal reflection.
Step 4Reflect the extensor mechanism medial-to-lateral in continuity (the defining step)
  • Beginning on the medial side, incise the triceps insertion and the periosteum of the proximal ulna at the tip and medial aspect of the olecranon.
  • Elevate the triceps insertion subperiosteally from the olecranon and proximal ulna, proceeding from medial to lateral.
  • Carry the forearm fascia over the proximal ulna and the anconeus with it, so the whole extensor mechanism β€” triceps tendon, forearm fascia and anconeus β€” is raised as one continuous sleeve and reflected laterally off the bone.
Step 5Expose the lateral column and open the joint
  • Continue the reflection laterally, elevating the anconeus from the humerus and ulna until the lateral column and the lateral capsule are exposed.
  • The posterior capsule and the olecranon fossa come into view; resect the tip of the olecranon if required to clear the olecranon fossa.
  • For total elbow arthroplasty, release the lateral collateral ligament complex and capsule from the lateral epicondyle to allow the elbow to be flexed and dislocated β€” acceptable because a linked implant provides its own stability.
Step 6Deliver the distal humerus
  • With the extensor mechanism reflected laterally, flex the elbow and gently dislocate it so the distal humerus is brought out into the wound.
  • The articular surface of the trochlea and capitellum, both columns and the olecranon fossa are now widely exposed β€” ready for joint preparation, fracture fixation, reconstruction or implantation.
Step 7Prepare the joint and implant (for arthroplasty)
  • Open and prepare the medullary canals of the humerus and ulna, respecting the carrying angle.
  • Reference the centre of rotation to the lateral epicondyle and trial the components with the elbow reduced.
  • Confirm range of motion and stability before final implantation of a linked (semiconstrained) prosthesis such as the Coonrad-Morrey device.
Step 8Secure transosseous triceps reattachment (the critical closure step)
  • Return the reflected triceps-anconeus-forearm-fascia sleeve to its anatomic position.
  • Pass a number-5 nonabsorbable suture (heavy braided polyester) in a criss-cross (cruciate) pattern through two transverse drill holes in the proximal ulna, tensioning the triceps back down onto the olecranon.
  • Supplement the transosseous cruciate repair with a side-to-side repair of the triceps to the forearm fascia and anconeus, re-establishing the continuity of the extensor mechanism.
Step 9Transpose the ulnar nerve and close
  • Transpose the ulnar nerve anteriorly into a subcutaneous pocket (after adequate mobilisation and medial intermuscular septum release) to protect it from the medial column of the prosthesis and from postoperative scarring.
  • Close the fascial and subcutaneous layers over a drain and close the skin.
  • Immobilise the elbow in extension in a well-padded splint to off-load the fresh triceps repair.
The ulnar nerve is the number-one structure at risk

The ulnar nerve is the most important structure at risk in every posterior elbow approach. It must be identified before any deep dissection, mobilised over a generous length, protected with a vessel loop, never compressed by a retractor, and usually anteriorly transposed at closure β€” particularly for total elbow arthroplasty, where medial-column preparation and the implant itself threaten the nerve in situ.

Why a linked implant suits this exposure

Because the approach for arthroplasty releases the lateral collateral ligament complex to deliver the humerus, the elbow is rendered unstable on the lateral side. This is why a linked (semiconstrained) prosthesis, such as the Coonrad-Morrey device, is the implant of choice: it provides intrinsic stability and does not depend on the collateral ligaments. In trauma cases, preserve and repair the lateral ulnar collateral ligament instead.

Dangers & Extensions

The four structures that define a safe case:

Ulnar nerve

The most important structure at risk. Runs behind the medial epicondyle in the cubital tunnel and crosses the medial side of the joint. At risk from traction, compression by retractors, and the medial column of a prosthesis. Prevention: identify first, mobilise generously, protect with a vessel loop, never let a retractor press on it, and usually transpose it anteriorly at closure.

Radial nerve

Lies in the spiral groove on the posterior humeral shaft, about 10 cm proximal to the lateral epicondyle, before piercing the lateral intermuscular septum to enter the anterior compartment. At risk only with proximal extension along the humerus. Prevention: stay subperiosteal and distal; avoid straying proximally on the posterior shaft.

Lateral ulnar collateral ligament

The LUCL and the common extensor origin arise from the lateral epicondyle. They are released from the lateral column to deliver the humerus for arthroplasty (acceptable with a linked implant) but should be preserved and repaired in trauma to avoid posterolateral rotatory instability.

Triceps mechanism

The extensor mechanism itself is the structure the approach depends on. The key risk is triceps insufficiency from failure of reattachment or over-aggressive early mobilisation. Prevention: reflect in continuity, and reattach with a secure transosseous cruciate repair.

Extensile options. The incision can be extended proximally along the posterior humerus by developing the interval between the long and lateral heads of the triceps; this is limited by the radial nerve, which crosses the posterior humeral shaft in the spiral groove roughly 10 cm proximal to the distal articular surface β€” stay strictly subperiosteal, and never place a large self-retaining retractor high on the shaft. It can be extended distally along the subcutaneous border of the ulna, developing the interval between flexor carpi ulnaris (ulnar nerve) medially and extensor carpi ulnaris (posterior interosseous nerve) laterally β€” continuous with the classic ulnar (Boyd) approach. The exposure can also be extended laterally into a Kocher-type interval for access to the radial head or the lateral collateral complex, but it cannot reach the anterior structures of the elbow without a separate anterior incision. Closure. Reattach the triceps with a number-5 nonabsorbable cruciate suture through drill holes in the olecranon, plus a side-to-side repair to the forearm fascia and anconeus; transpose the ulnar nerve anteriorly into a subcutaneous pocket in almost all arthroplasty cases; close the fascial and subcutaneous layers over a drain; and immobilise the elbow in extension in a splint to protect the triceps repair. Depending on the security of the repair, controlled active extension and flexion are begun under a defined protocol; resisted extension is avoided until the triceps repair has healed. Approach-related complications:

Complications, prevention and management
ComplicationPreventionManagement
Triceps insufficiencyMeticulous transosseous cruciate reattachment; protected rehabReconstruction with an Achilles tendon allograft or anconeus flap in established cases
Ulnar nerve palsyEarly identification, gentle mobilisation, anterior transpositionObservation for neurapraxia; exploration if complete and persistent
Wound breakdownCareful handling, drain, immobilisation in extensionLocal wound care; flap coverage for full-thickness loss; consider implant removal if infected
Radial nerve injury (proximal extension)Stay subperiosteal and distalObservation; explore if no recovery
Instability (trauma cases)Preserve and repair the LUCLLigament reconstruction or revision to a linked implant

Post-arthroplasty complications (approach-relevant):

Total elbow arthroplasty complications and their management
ComplicationIncidencePreventionTreatment
Triceps insufficiencyVariableSecure reattachment, protected rehabReconstruction; revision
Ulnar neuropathyVariableGentle handling, transpositionObserve; explore if indicated
InfectionA few percentAseptic technique, antibioticsDebridement, antibiotic suppression, revision or resection
Aseptic looseningIncreases with timeCorrect component alignmentRevision arthroplasty
Periprosthetic fractureVariableCareful canal preparationFixation or revision
The key complication

Triceps insufficiency is the defining approach-related complication of the Bryan-Morrey exposure. It presents as painless weakness of active elbow extension and an extensor lag, and it is almost always preventable by a meticulous transosseous cruciate reattachment and a protected rehabilitation protocol.

Procedures Through This Approach

  • Total elbow arthroplasty β€” the linked semiconstrained prosthesis is implanted through this exposure; release of the lateral collateral complex to deliver the humerus is acceptable because a linked implant provides its own stability.
  • Complex distal humeral fracture management β€” including primary total elbow arthroplasty for the unreconstructable, low, comminuted fracture in the elderly.
  • Distal humeral non-union and malunion β€” wide bilateral-column access for revision fixation or reconstruction.
  • Ankylosis release and excision of heterotopic bone β€” extensile access to the anterior and posterior elbow.
  • Resection of selected distal humeral tumours β€” where a wide posterior exposure is sufficient.

Viva & Exam Focus

Mnemonic

TRICEPSBRYAN-MORREY STEPS

T
Posterior incision just medial to the olecranon
Curves onto the radial side of the proximal ulna
R
Release and protect the ulnar nerve
Identify first; mobilise; vessel loop; transpose at closure
I
Incise the triceps insertion subperiosteally
Begin on the medial side of the olecranon
C
Carry the reflection medial to lateral
Stay subperiosteal; single nerve territory
E
Elevate anconeus and forearm fascia with the triceps
Extensor mechanism raised as one continuous sleeve
P
Preserve the radial nerve proximally
Stay distal to about 10 cm from the joint
S
Secure transosseous reattachment
Cruciate number-5 suture through olecranon drill holes
Mnemonic

CRUCIATESECURE TRICEPS REATTACHMENT

C
Cruciate (criss-cross) suture pattern
Number-5 nonabsorbable, heavy braided polyester
R
Reattach through drill holes in the olecranon
Two transverse tunnels in the proximal ulna
U
Ulna (olecranon) is the anchor
Transosseous fixation back to bone
C
Continuity of the extensor mechanism restored
Triceps, anconeus and forearm fascia as one sleeve
I
Immobilise the elbow in extension initially
Off-loads the fresh repair
A
Approximate side-to-side
Triceps to forearm fascia and anconeus
T
Tension the triceps anatomically
Secure the tendon down onto the olecranon
E
Early protected mobilisation
Avoid resisted extension until healed

Exam Viva Scenarios

Practise clinical reasoning and management decisions out loud

Viva scenarioStandard
Clinical prompt

β€œA 68-year-old with painful post-traumatic arthritis of the elbow is listed for a total elbow arthroplasty. Describe the Bryan-Morrey approach you would use.”

Practical approach
Position the patient in lateral decubitus with the arm uppermost over a padded support and the forearm hanging free, so the elbow flexes beyond 90 degrees and the field is horizontal; apply a sterile tourniquet. Make a straight posterior incision about 15 cm long passing just medial to the olecranon tip and curving onto the radial side of the proximal ulna. Identify the ulnar nerve first behind the medial epicondyle, mobilise it from proximal through the cubital tunnel to distal, release any constricting fascia, protect it with a vessel loop, and release the medial intermuscular septum for later transposition. For the deep dissection β€” the defining step β€” elevate the triceps insertion subperiosteally from the olecranon and proximal ulna from medial to lateral, carrying the forearm fascia and the anconeus with it so the whole extensor mechanism is reflected laterally as one continuous sleeve; flex and dislocate the elbow to deliver the distal humerus. There is no true internervous plane, because both the triceps and anconeus are supplied by the radial nerve. Prepare the humeral and ulnar canals and implant a linked (semiconstrained) prosthesis, because the lateral collateral complex has been released. Close by reattaching the triceps with a secure transosseous cruciate number-5 suture through drill holes in the olecranon, transposing the ulnar nerve anteriorly, closing over a drain, and splinting the elbow in extension.
Key clinical points
Lateral decubitus; posterior incision just medial to the olecranon
Identify and protect the ulnar nerve before any deep dissection
Reflect the extensor mechanism medial to lateral in continuity
No true internervous plane β€” triceps and anconeus are both radial nerve
Deliver the distal humerus by flexing and dislocating the elbow
Use a linked implant because the lateral ligament complex is released
Secure transosseous cruciate triceps reattachment at closure
Anterior ulnar nerve transposition at closure
Common pitfalls
Claiming there is an internervous plane (there is not)
Forgetting to identify the ulnar nerve before deep dissection
Splitting or cutting the triceps instead of reflecting it in continuity
Failing to mention secure transosseous reattachment and the risk of triceps insufficiency
Further questions
β€œHow would you reattach the triceps at closure, and why is a linked implant preferred after this exposure?”
Viva scenarioChallenging
Clinical prompt

β€œSix months after a total elbow arthroplasty performed through a Bryan-Morrey approach, a patient reports painless weakness and cannot push up from a chair using the operated arm. What is your diagnosis and management?”

Practical approach
The picture is classic for triceps insufficiency, the key approach-related complication of a triceps-reflecting exposure. Painless weakness of active elbow extension with difficulty pushing up from a chair or raising the arm overhead, together with an extensor lag, points to failure of the triceps reattachment. Confirm the diagnosis clinically by testing active extension against gravity and looking for a lag, and by palpating for a gap at the triceps insertion; ultrasound or MRI demonstrates the disrupted insertion and helps plan reconstruction, while plain radiographs confirm the implant is well fixed and exclude loosening or infection. The mechanism is usually inadequate reattachment, disruption of the repair, or over-aggressive early rehabilitation rather than a fresh injury, and the painless nature of the weakness distinguishes it from loosening or infection. Conservative measures rarely satisfy an active patient with a symptomatic lag, so surgical reconstruction is the mainstay β€” options include reinsertion of the triceps with a transosseous or suture-anchor repair, reinforcement with an Achilles tendon allograft, or an anconeus slide flap; infection must be ruled out beforehand, and the repair is protected with a graduated extension-strengthening protocol. The case underlines that triceps insufficiency is best prevented at the index operation by a meticulous transosseous cruciate reattachment and protected rehabilitation.
Key clinical points
Diagnosis: triceps insufficiency β€” the key approach-related complication
Hallmarks: painless weakness of active extension and an extensor lag
Confirm with examination, ultrasound or MRI, and exclude loosening and infection
Usually reflects inadequate reattachment or over-aggressive rehab
Surgical reconstruction is the mainstay for symptomatic cases
Options include reinsertion, Achilles allograft reinforcement, or anconeus flap
Rule out infection before reconstruction
Prevented at the index operation by secure transosseous reattachment
Common pitfalls
Reassuring the patient that the weakness will resolve without investigation
Failing to exclude loosening or infection before reconstruction
Not recognising that painless weakness is characteristic of mechanical insufficiency
Forgetting that prevention depends on the quality of reattachment at the index operation
Further questions
β€œHow would you reconstruct a chronic, retracted triceps deficiency?”
Viva scenarioStandard
Clinical prompt

β€œCompare the Bryan-Morrey approach with the Kocher approach to the elbow.”

Practical approach
The Bryan-Morrey is a posterior, triceps-reflecting approach. A posterior incision reflects the extensor mechanism from medial to lateral in continuity; it has no true internervous plane, because the triceps and anconeus are both radial-nerve structures reflected subperiosteally off bone. It gives wide, extensile exposure of the distal humerus and the whole elbow joint and is the workhorse for total elbow arthroplasty and distal humeral reconstruction. Its key structure at risk is the ulnar nerve, and its key complication is triceps insufficiency. The Kocher approach is lateral. A lateral incision develops a true internervous plane between the anconeus, supplied by the radial nerve, and the extensor carpi ulnaris, supplied by the posterior interosseous nerve. It is best for radial head surgery, repair of the lateral collateral ligament complex and capitellar fractures; its key structure at risk is the posterior interosseous nerve as it enters the supinator, and it gives no useful access to the medial column. Use Bryan-Morrey when broad posterior and bilateral-column exposure is needed for arthroplasty or distal humeral reconstruction, and use Kocher for lateral-side pathology where a true internervous plane is an advantage and the medial side need not be seen.
Key clinical points
Bryan-Morrey is posterior and has no internervous plane
Kocher is lateral and uses a true internervous plane (anconeus vs ECU)
Bryan-Morrey is for TEA and distal humeral reconstruction
Kocher is for radial head, lateral ligament and capitellar work
Bryan-Morrey risks the ulnar nerve and the triceps mechanism
Kocher risks the posterior interosseous nerve
Kocher gives no access to the medial column
Choice depends on the pathology and the side of the elbow involved
Common pitfalls
Saying the Bryan-Morrey has an internervous plane
Confusing which nerve is at risk in each approach
Using Kocher when broad distal humeral exposure is required
Forgetting that Kocher cannot reach the medial column
Further questions
β€œWhich approach would you use for a comminuted radial head fracture, and how would you protect the posterior interosseous nerve in the Kocher approach?”
Exam day cheat sheet
BRYAN-MORREY (TRICEPS-REFLECTING) APPROACH

Position & Incision

  • Lateral decubitus with the arm uppermost over a padded support is standard for TEA
  • Supine with the arm across the chest is an alternative
  • Straight posterior incision about 15 cm long, just medial to the olecranon
  • Incision curves onto the radial side of the proximal ulna distally
  • Full elbow flexion and circumferential access must be possible before draping

Ulnar Nerve

  • The number-one structure at risk β€” identify it first
  • Mobilise from proximal through the cubital tunnel to distal
  • Protect with a vessel loop; never compress it with a retractor
  • Release the medial intermuscular septum
  • Usually transposed anteriorly into a subcutaneous pocket at closure, especially for TEA

Internervous Plane

  • There is NO true internervous plane
  • Both the triceps and anconeus are supplied by the radial nerve
  • They are reflected subperiosteally off the humerus and ulna
  • Contrast with Kocher: a true plane between anconeus and ECU
  • The dissection is subperiosteal and intermuscular, not internervous

Triceps Reflection

  • Elevate the triceps insertion subperiosteally from the olecranon and proximal ulna
  • Reflect from medial to lateral
  • Carry the forearm fascia and anconeus with it in continuity
  • Raise the whole extensor mechanism as one continuous sleeve
  • Flex and dislocate the elbow to deliver the distal humerus

Triceps Reattachment (Closure)

  • Secure transosseous cruciate repair is the critical closure step
  • Number-5 nonabsorbable suture in a criss-cross pattern
  • Passed through two transverse drill holes in the olecranon
  • Supplemented by side-to-side repair to forearm fascia and anconeus
  • Elbow splinted in extension initially to protect the repair

Complications

  • Triceps insufficiency is the key approach-related complication
  • Ulnar nerve palsy is the key nerve injury
  • Radial nerve is at risk only with proximal extension (around 10 cm from the joint)
  • Wound breakdown and infection are risks, especially in rheumatoid patients
  • Instability in trauma cases if the lateral collateral complex is not repaired

References

Guidelines, Registries & Global Practice The Bryan-Morrey triceps-reflecting approach is a universally taught exposure used in elbow arthroplasty and distal humeral reconstruction across all examination systems. The technical principles converge globally: ulnar-nerve identification and protection, medial-to-lateral reflection of the extensor mechanism in continuity, and secure transosseous reattachment. Side-by-side principles (where guidance converges): | Body | Position on elbow arthroplasty exposure |

|------|-----------------------------------------| | AAOS (US) | Linked semiconstrained implants are the standard for inflammatory and complex post-traumatic arthritis; meticulous extensor-mechanism handling and secure reattachment are emphasised to limit triceps insufficiency | | BOA / BESS (UK) | TEA reserved for low-demand patients with inflammatory or post-traumatic arthritis; emphasise ulnar-nerve management, wound protection and lifelong activity restrictions | | EFORT / European consensus | A triceps-reflecting or triceps-sparing posterior exposure is standard for linked TEA; the linked implant provides stability after lateral soft-tissue release | Registry and outcome evidence: - National arthroplasty registries (for example the National Joint Registry, the Australian AOANJRR and the Swedish Elbow Arthroplasty Register) report that rheumatoid arthritis remains a leading indication for TEA and that revision is most commonly for aseptic loosening, infection, instability and component failure; triceps insufficiency is a recognised but less frequent cause of revision.

  • Long-term cohort data show that the linked prosthesis implanted through a triceps-reflecting exposure gives durable pain relief and a functional arc in appropriately selected, low-demand patients. Global practice variation. In well-resourced settings a linked semiconstrained prosthesis implanted through a formal Bryan-Morrey exposure is standard. In resource-limited settings, distal humeral fractures and reconstructions are more often managed with internal fixation through a posterior approach, and TEA is reserved for a small selected group; the surgical anatomy and the principles of ulnar-nerve and extensor-mechanism handling remain identical. Consent (globally applicable). Discuss triceps insufficiency and the possibility of further surgery for extensor-mechanism failure, ulnar nerve symptoms (numbness or weakness), wound problems and infection, stiffness, implant loosening and the lifelong restriction on heavy or repetitive loading of the operated arm.
Orthopaedic relevance

For the Operative Surgery station you must describe the Bryan-Morrey approach systematically: the posterior incision, early ulnar-nerve identification and protection, the medial-to-lateral reflection of the extensor mechanism in continuity, the absence of a true internervous plane, the radial nerve as the limit of proximal extension, and the secure transosseous reattachment that prevents triceps insufficiency.

Evidence

Description of the Triceps-Reflecting Approach to the Elbow

LoE 5
Bryan RS, Morrey BF β€’ In: Morrey BF (ed). The Elbow and Its Disorders. Philadelphia: WB Saunders (1985)
Key Findings:
  • The landmark description of the extensive posterior, triceps-reflecting approach to the elbow
  • The extensor mechanism (triceps, anconeus and forearm fascia) is reflected from medial to lateral in continuity
  • The technique provides wide exposure of the distal humerus and elbow joint for arthroplasty and reconstruction
  • Preserving the continuity of the extensor mechanism allows a secure reattachment at closure
Clinical implication: The primary source defining the exposure that became the standard for linked total elbow arthroplasty and distal humeral reconstruction
Evidence

Semiconstrained Arthroplasty for the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis of the Elbow

LoE 4
Morrey BF, Adams RA β€’ Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (Am) (1992)
Key Findings:
  • Defined the modern semiconstrained (linked) total elbow prosthesis implanted through a triceps-reflecting exposure
  • Reported reliable pain relief and a functional arc of motion in rheumatoid arthritis
  • Established the linked implant as the standard when the lateral collateral complex is released for exposure
  • Identified loosening, instability and triceps and ulnar-nerve problems as the principal complications
Clinical implication: The benchmark report underpinning the routine use of the Bryan-Morrey approach for linked total elbow arthroplasty
Evidence

Total Replacement for Post-Traumatic Arthritis of the Elbow

LoE 4
Morrey BF, Adams RA, Bryan RS β€’ Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (Br) (1991)
Key Findings:
  • Extended the indication for linked total elbow arthroplasty to post-traumatic arthritis
  • Demonstrated pain relief and functional improvement through the standard triceps-reflecting exposure
  • Showed a higher complication rate in post-traumatic than in rheumatoid cases
  • Highlighted the importance of meticulous soft-tissue handling and secure triceps reattachment
Clinical implication: Established TEA through the Bryan-Morrey approach as a salvage option for selected post-traumatic elbows
Evidence

The Coonrad-Morrey Total Elbow Arthroplasty in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Ten to Fifteen-Year Follow-up Study

LoE 4
Gill DRJ, Morrey BF β€’ Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (Am) (1998)
Key Findings:
  • Reported durable results of the linked prosthesis at ten to fifteen-year follow-up in rheumatoid patients
  • Confirmed sustained pain relief and a functional range of motion over the long term
  • Aseptic loosening emerged as the principal mode of late failure
  • Supported the triceps-reflecting exposure as a reliable platform for durable arthroplasty
Clinical implication: Provided long-term outcome data supporting the standard linked implant and its triceps-reflecting exposure in rheumatoid disease
Evidence

Total Elbow Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review of the Literature in the English Language Until the End of 2003

LoE 3
Little CP, Graham AJ, Carr AJ β€’ Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (Br) (2005)
Key Findings:
  • Systematic review of the total elbow arthroplasty literature across implant designs
  • Total elbow arthroplasty carries a higher overall complication rate than other major joint replacements
  • Prominent complications include loosening, instability, infection, wound problems and triceps insufficiency
  • Underscored the importance of meticulous exposure, soft-tissue handling and secure triceps reattachment
Clinical implication: Quantifies the complication burden that makes attention to exposure and extensor-mechanism handling central to elbow arthroplasty
Editorially reviewed β€” transparent references and correction processPublished by OrthoVellum Medical Education TeamEditorial boardMethodologyReview policy
Educational disclosure

Educational content is reviewed for source visibility, editorial coherence, and correction readiness.

No individual clinician credential is claimed unless a named person is shown.

Verify before clinical use; this is not medical advice or a substitute for local guidance.