Skip to main content
OrthoVellumOrthopaedic Exam Prep
Pricing
About OrthoVellum
OrthoVellum
A living orthopaedic atlas

Exam-focused orthopaedic references, a question bank, viva practice, and spaced-repetition revision — with every clinical claim traceable to its source. Content is educational only and is not a substitute for local supervision, clinical judgement, or institutional policy.


Library

  • Clinical Topics
  • Blog
  • Site Updates
  • Content Methodology

Company

  • About Us
  • Authors & Disclosure
  • Editorial Team
  • Editorial Policy
  • Advertising Policy

Legal

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Medical Disclaimer
  • Copyright & DMCA

Support

  • Support OrthoVellum
  • Help Center
  • Contact
  • Accessibility
Evidence. Clarity. Practice.

© 2026 OrthoVellum. For educational purposes only.

Not medical advice. Verify clinically important information against current local guidance.

Total Elbow Replacement

Operative SurgeryShoulder & Elbow
Shoulder & ElbowAdvancedCore Procedure

Total Elbow Replacement

Total elbow replacement (linked, unlinked, semiconstrained) — the Bryan-Morrey triceps-on exposure and operative sequence step by step, linked versus unlinked implant selection, lifetime activity restrictions, complications and revision. advanced orthopaedic operative-surgery guide.

Procedure console
20 min
Read
0
Sections
advanced
Level
Peer-reviewed · 2026-06-20
High-yield overview

Bryan-Morrey posterior triceps-on approach · linked vs unlinked implants · advanced

RAMost common indication worldwide
Linked / unlinkedImplant families
5Danger zones around the elbow
90-120 minTypical duration
Critical Must-Knows
  • Primary indications are rheumatoid arthritis (the most common worldwide), an unreconstructable comminuted distal humerus fracture in the low-demand elderly (McKee 2008 RCT), end-stage post-traumatic arthritis, and rarely end-stage primary OA.
  • Choose a linked semiconstrained implant (e.g. Coonrad-Morrey) for RA, instability, bone loss, tumour or revision; reserve an unlinked implant (Kudo, Souter-Strathclyde) for well-preserved ligaments and bone. The linked design allows 7-8 degrees of varus-valgus laxity that reduces stress at the cement-bone interface.
  • Implant survival is around 85-90 percent at 5 years and 75-85 percent at 10 years for linked designs in RA; aseptic loosening is the most common long-term failure mode and revision TER carries a 30-40 percent complication rate.
  • The Bryan-Morrey approach reflects the triceps medially off the olecranon as a continuous periosteal sleeve (triceps-on); a meticulous repair through bone tunnels is mandatory and protected for 6 weeks.
  • Lifetime activity restriction of less than 5 kg single-lift (and less than 1 kg repetitive) is a defining counselling point — failure to counsel is a medicolegal trap.
  • The ulnar nerve is the most commonly injured nerve; anterior transposition at the time of TER is standard practice.

When & Why


Indication. A painful, end-stage elbow arthritis or an unreconstructable distal humerus fracture where preserving movement matters more than heavy loading. The four classic indications: - Rheumatoid arthritis — the most common indication worldwide. Larsen grade 3-5 disease (moderate-to-severe articular destruction) that has failed adequate medical management (DMARDs, biologics), with pain and disability disproportionate to the damage seen on imaging. Bilateral involvement is common; 10-year survival is 85-92 percent in this lower-demand population.

  • Comminuted distal humerus fracture in the elderly — an unreconstructable, osteoporotic, intra-articular (OTA 13C) fracture, usually in a patient over 65, where stable fixation cannot be achieved. The Level I evidence (McKee 2008 RCT) showed primary semiconstrained TER gave better Mayo Elbow Performance Scores than ORIF to 2 years, and 5 of 21 patients randomised to ORIF were converted to TER intra-operatively because fixation was unachievable.
  • End-stage post-traumatic arthritis — following malunited fractures, chronic instability, or failed ORIF (hardware removal is often a first stage). Results are inferior to the RA cohort because patients are younger and higher-demand; arthrodesis remains an option in young high-demand patients.
  • Other — primary osteoarthritis (rare, older low-demand patients), tumour resection (distal humerus sarcoma requiring wide resection), and revision of a failed elbow arthroplasty. Contraindications. Absolute: active infection (local or systemic), a non-functional deltoid and biceps unable to stabilise the arm, a young high-demand patient who will not accept the activity restrictions, and insufficient bone stock to seat the components. Relative: prior osteomyelitis or chronic infection, neuropathic arthropathy, a young active patient (under 50 years — consider alternatives), and a BMI over 40. The one decision that matters — linked versus unlinked. Every technique shares the same Bryan-Morrey exposure; the implant choice rests on ligament and bone quality.
Linked (semiconstrained)

e.g. Coonrad-Morrey, Discovery. Provides inherent stability through a polyethylene bushing. Use when ligaments are deficient, bone is eroded, or for instability, tumour or revision. The 7-8 degrees of varus-valgus laxity reduces cement-interface stress versus a fully constrained design. More forgiving — the default for RA.

Unlinked (resurfacing)

e.g. Kudo type-5, Souter-Strathclyde. Relies entirely on intact collateral ligaments and good bone stock for stability. Preserves more physiological kinematics and has lower bushing wear if perfectly balanced, but carries a higher instability risk if poorly selected.

What the evidence shows

No large RCT compares linked versus unlinked directly, but register data (Plaschke 2014, 324 procedures) found the unlinked design carried a relative risk of revision of 1.9 versus linked. Most surgeons therefore favour a linked design for RA.

Consent specifically for the lifetime activity restriction (less than 5 kg single-lift and less than 1 kg repetitive, for life), a small risk of incomplete pain relief, ulnar nerve symptoms, wound problems (the medial elbow skin is thin and poorly vascularised, especially in RA on immunosuppression), and a reoperation or revision risk that rises over time. Setup. Lateral decubitus (preferred for the Bryan-Morrey approach) with the arm draped free over a padded support, flexed 90 degrees across the chest, and a proximal arm tourniquet — gravity assists the medial-to-lateral reflection of the triceps sleeve. Supine-with-arm-across-chest is the alternative and gives easier anaesthetic access. Loupe magnification and meticulous haemostasis are essential — the ulnar nerve and anterior structures are the whole game.

The Operation


The goal is to expose the elbow through the Bryan-Morrey posterior triceps-on approach, remove the articular surfaces, seat a linked (or occasionally unlinked) prosthesis in the humeral and ulnar canals, link the components before the cement sets, and restore a stable, painless flexion-extension arc — all while protecting the ulnar nerve and repairing the triceps sleeve soundly. Exposure anatomy to hold in mind. The distal humerus has two columns: the medial column (arising from the posterior cortex at about 45 degrees, ending at the medial epicondyle and the MCL origin) and the broader lateral column (about 80 degrees, ending at the capitellum and the LCL origin), joined across a thin articular segment (trochlea medial, capitellum lateral) at the olecranon fossa. The proximal ulna contributes the olecranon (triceps insertion) and coronoid (anterior stability, anterior MCL bundle origin) framing the semilunar (trochlear) notch. The ulnar nerve pierces the medial intermuscular septum, runs posterior to the medial epicondyle in the cubital tunnel (roofed by Osborne's retinaculum), and enters the forearm between the two heads of FCU — it must be identified and anteriorly transposed. The carrying angle (10-15 degrees valgus) and the anterior humeral line (which should bisect the capitellum) are the radiographic checks of component alignment.

Total elbow replacement implant components showing humeral and ulnar stems
Linked total elbow replacement system: cemented humeral and ulnar stems with snap-fit articulation. The bushing mechanism allows ~7° varus-valgus laxity to reduce bone-implant stress.Credit: Wieser K et al., BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2015 (PMC4799294) — CC BY 4.0
Close-up articulation of total elbow replacement showing polyethylene bushing
Close-up of the articulating mechanism: polyethylene bushing links humeral and ulnar components, providing semi-constrained articulation with controlled load transfer.Credit: Wieser K et al., BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2015 (PMC4799294) — CC BY 4.0
Pre-operative clinical photograph of severely deformed elbow in rheumatoid arthritis
Pre-operative presentation: severe rheumatoid elbow deformity with marked valgus angulation, soft-tissue wasting, and prominent bony landmarks — typical TER indication.Credit: Cil A et al., J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2015 (PMC5040571) — CC BY 4.0
Nine-panel case series showing pre-op X-rays, tumor excision, TER insertion, and post-op X-rays
Tumour-related TER case series: (top) pre-op AP/lateral X-rays; (middle) en-bloc bone excision and trial component insertion with arrow marking implant position; (bottom) post-op AP and lateral radiographs showing well-fixed linked TER.Credit: Koh KH et al., J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2014 (PMC3868144) — CC BY-NC 3.0

The Bryan-Morrey triceps-on operation

Step 1Position & incision
  • Lateral decubitus, arm draped free over a padded support, flexed 90 degrees across the chest, proximal arm tourniquet.
  • A midline posterior incision from 8-10 cm proximal to the olecranon tip to about 6 cm distal, curved slightly medially at the tip to keep the scar off the bony prominence.
  • Raise thick full-thickness skin flaps medially and laterally to deep fascia.
Step 2Identify and transpose the ulnar nerve (FIRST)
  • Identify the ulnar nerve posterior to the medial epicondyle; trace it proximally through the Arcade of Struthers (if present) and distally into FCU.
  • Release the cubital tunnel retinaculum (Osborne's ligament) completely and create a subcutaneous pocket anterior to the medial epicondyle.
  • Transpose the nerve anteriorly and protect it with a vessel loop for the rest of the case. Do this before any traction or retraction is applied.
Step 3Develop the medial periosteal sleeve
  • Identify the medial border of the triceps at the medial epicondyle.
  • With sharp dissection (knife or periosteal elevator), elevate the fascia and periosteum as a continuous sheet from the medial epicondyle, including the deep surface of the triceps tendon and its insertion onto the olecranon tip.
  • Maintain continuity — no gaps or buttonholes in the sleeve.
Step 4Develop the lateral sleeve
  • Continue the sleeve elevation over the olecranon tip laterally, incorporating the anconeus with the lateral sleeve.
  • Elevate off the lateral epicondyle, preserving the lateral collateral ligament origin where possible.
  • The sleeve now reflects the entire extensor mechanism medially, exposing the joint.
Step 5Expose and excise the radial head (if involved)
  • Identify the radiocapitellar joint through the lateral exposure.
  • Excise the radial head if it is involved (typical in RA) to improve exposure and balance; preserve the interosseous membrane attachments distally.
Step 6Joint exposure and preparation
  • Excise the remaining articular cartilage, osteophytes and loose bodies.
  • Identify and protect the anterior capsule — avoid injury to the brachial artery and median nerve anteriorly.
  • Assess ligament integrity, which confirms the linked-versus-unlinked decision if not already made.
Step 7Humeral canal preparation
  • Remove the articular surfaces with an oscillating saw while preserving the columnar architecture.
  • Open the humeral canal with a starting awl just proximal to the olecranon fossa; ream sequentially to the appropriate size.
  • Trial the humeral component and check rotation (aligned with the epicondylar axis; the component sits in 3-5 degrees of external rotation relative to that axis).
Step 8Ulnar canal preparation
  • Open the proximal ulnar canal at the midpoint of the olecranon tip.
  • Ream carefully, respecting the anterior bow of the ulna.
  • Trial the ulnar component and confirm it seats and rotates smoothly against the humeral trial.
Step 9Cement and insert the components, then link
  • Pulsatile lavage and dry the canals; place a cement plug 1-2 cm beyond the stem tip.
  • Insert the ulnar component first with third-generation cement technique (plug, pressurisation, retrograde delivery), then the humeral component, correctly aligned in the flexion-extension plane.
  • For a linked design, link the components with the polyethylene bushing before the cement hardens.
  • Check the range: aim for 0-130 degrees flexion with full pronation-supination. Remove all excess posterior cement before it sets.
Step 10Triceps sleeve repair and closure
  • Return the sleeve to its anatomic position over the olecranon.
  • Pass heavy non-absorbable sutures (number 5 FiberWire or equivalent) through bone tunnels in the olecranon in a Krackow or Mason-Allen configuration for secure purchase.
  • Repair the fascia on both the medial and lateral sides under appropriate tension; check the repair strength before closure.
  • Layered closure; bring the ulnar nerve back to its subcutaneous anterior position or leave it transposed.

Cement technique principles. Third-generation cementing underpins long-term survival: a cement plug 1-2 cm beyond the stem tip, pulsatile lavage to clear marrow fat and debris, retrograde pressurised delivery, the component inserted before the cement reaches its dough phase, and a 2-3 mm circumferential mantle around the stem.

Ulnar nerve — the critical operative safety step

The ulnar nerve is the most commonly injured structure in TER. Identify it posterior to the medial epicondyle and anteriorly transpose it before any retraction. Protect it with a vessel loop throughout, avoid a tight anterior pocket, and decompress it fully at closure. Avoid anterior retractors beyond the capsule (the brachial artery and median nerve lie anteriorly) and blunt retractors anterolateral to the capitellum (the radial nerve passes anterior to the lateral epicondyle into the radial tunnel).

The triceps sleeve is the whole approach

The Bryan-Morrey approach depends entirely on a secure, continuous periosteal sleeve. Reflect it sharply off the olecranon tip, reattach it through bone tunnels with heavy non-absorbable suture (Krackow or Mason-Allen), and protect the repair for 6 weeks — no resisted extension, gravity-assisted extension only. Inadequate repair causes extensor lag and functional failure; complete avulsion is the most feared approach-specific complication.

Link before the cement sets

For a linked implant, link the humeral and ulnar components with the bushing while the cement is still workable, then make the final alignment and range-of-motion adjustments. Confirm at least 0-130 degrees of flexion and full pronation-supination before the cement hardens, and clear all posterior cement.

Aftercare & Complications


Rehabilitation — protect the triceps repair | Phase | Timing | Focus | Key limits | |-------|--------|-------|------------| | Immediate | 0-6 weeks | Posterior splint at 90 degrees flexion, forearm supination, for 5-7 days; then active-assisted ROM | No resisted extension; gravity-assisted extension only; full pronation-supination from day 1 | | Intermediate | 6-12 weeks | Active triceps work against gravity (week 6), light Theraband (week 8), gradual return to light two-handed ADLs | No carrying; protect the repair | | Functional | 12-20 weeks | Driving (surgeon's discretion), return to sedentary then heavier work | Always within the lifetime weight limits | Target a functional arc of 30-130 degrees flexion by 6 weeks. Most patients are independent with light ADLs by 6 weeks, back to sedentary work by 8-10 weeks, and return to heavier work by 16-20 weeks — within the lifetime limits. Lifetime activity restrictions — the defining counselling point

Less than 5 kg for life

A TER is for low-demand use only, for life: a single-lift limit of less than 5 kg (roughly a full kettle) and a repetitive-lift limit of less than 1 kg. No racquet sports, golf, contact sports or heavy manual work. The polyethylene bushing wears with cyclic loading and the cement-bone interface fatigues with excess stress — aseptic loosening is the direct consequence of exceeding these limits, no matter how good the elbow feels. A young patient (under 55) who cannot accept these restrictions is not a good TER candidate; offer arthrodesis or interpositional arthroplasty instead.

Complications

Aseptic loosening — the most common long-term failure; the humeral component loosens more often than the ulnar
Incidence
10-15% at 10 years; higher in young, active or post-traumatic patients
Prevention
Third-generation cement technique; activity restriction less than 5 kg; correct component alignment
Management
Revision TER with longer stems and structural graft; oncology-type implants for major bone loss; 30-40% complication rate at revision
Periprosthetic fracture — distal humerus or proximal ulna, often at the stem-tip stress riser
Incidence
3-5% cumulative; higher in osteoporotic RA; the humeral stem tip is the commonest site
Prevention
Press-fit distal humeral extension; activity restriction; watch for cortical thinning on serial X-rays
Management
Non-displaced with stable components: splint. Displaced with stable implants: ORIF with cerclage or plates. Loose implant: revision with a long stem bridging the fracture
Ulnar nerve palsy — the most common nerve injury; usually a neuropraxia
Incidence
2-5% post-operative palsy; minor dysaesthesia up to 10%; rarely permanent
Prevention
Anterior transposition at the outset; vessel-loop protection throughout; full decompression at closure
Management
Expectant — 70-80% recover by 3-6 months. EMG or NCS at 6-8 weeks; re-explore if no recovery by 3 months
Wound dehiscence and infection — the medial elbow skin is thin and poorly vascularised in RA
Incidence
5-10% wound complications; deep infection 3-7%; higher in RA on immunosuppression, post-radiotherapy or revision
Prevention
Full-thickness flaps; tension-free closure; minimise retractor pressure; delay surgery in an RA flare
Management
Superficial: wound care and oral antibiotics. Deep within 3-4 weeks: washout with component retention. Late deep: two-stage revision with a spacer; involve plastics for flap coverage
Triceps weakness or rupture — Bryan-Morrey-specific; avulsion of the periosteal sleeve is most feared
Incidence
Extensor lag over 20 degrees in 5-10%; complete rupture 1-3%
Prevention
Meticulous sleeve repair through bone tunnels with heavy non-absorbable suture; protect for 6 weeks
Management
Partial: structured rehabilitation. Complete and early (within 6 weeks): surgical repair. Late: reconstruction with fascia lata or Achilles allograft
Bushing wear and fracture — polyethylene wear generates debris and causes instability
Incidence
3-5% at 10 years requiring revision; higher in young or active patients
Prevention
Activity restriction; avoid impact; modern thicker polyethylene; regular X-ray follow-up
Management
Isolated bushing exchange if bone stock is preserved and components well-fixed. Metal-on-metal contact: urgent revision to prevent component damage
Complications of total elbow replacement
ComplicationIncidencePreventionManagement
Aseptic loosening — the most common long-term failure; the humeral component loosens more often than the ulnar10-15% at 10 years; higher in young, active or post-traumatic patientsThird-generation cement technique; activity restriction less than 5 kg; correct component alignmentRevision TER with longer stems and structural graft; oncology-type implants for major bone loss; 30-40% complication rate at revision
Periprosthetic fracture — distal humerus or proximal ulna, often at the stem-tip stress riser3-5% cumulative; higher in osteoporotic RA; the humeral stem tip is the commonest sitePress-fit distal humeral extension; activity restriction; watch for cortical thinning on serial X-raysNon-displaced with stable components: splint. Displaced with stable implants: ORIF with cerclage or plates. Loose implant: revision with a long stem bridging the fracture
Ulnar nerve palsy — the most common nerve injury; usually a neuropraxia2-5% post-operative palsy; minor dysaesthesia up to 10%; rarely permanentAnterior transposition at the outset; vessel-loop protection throughout; full decompression at closureExpectant — 70-80% recover by 3-6 months. EMG or NCS at 6-8 weeks; re-explore if no recovery by 3 months
Wound dehiscence and infection — the medial elbow skin is thin and poorly vascularised in RA5-10% wound complications; deep infection 3-7%; higher in RA on immunosuppression, post-radiotherapy or revisionFull-thickness flaps; tension-free closure; minimise retractor pressure; delay surgery in an RA flareSuperficial: wound care and oral antibiotics. Deep within 3-4 weeks: washout with component retention. Late deep: two-stage revision with a spacer; involve plastics for flap coverage
Triceps weakness or rupture — Bryan-Morrey-specific; avulsion of the periosteal sleeve is most fearedExtensor lag over 20 degrees in 5-10%; complete rupture 1-3%Meticulous sleeve repair through bone tunnels with heavy non-absorbable suture; protect for 6 weeksPartial: structured rehabilitation. Complete and early (within 6 weeks): surgical repair. Late: reconstruction with fascia lata or Achilles allograft
Bushing wear and fracture — polyethylene wear generates debris and causes instability3-5% at 10 years requiring revision; higher in young or active patientsActivity restriction; avoid impact; modern thicker polyethylene; regular X-ray follow-upIsolated bushing exchange if bone stock is preserved and components well-fixed. Metal-on-metal contact: urgent revision to prevent component damage

Deep periprosthetic joint infection follows the established algorithm: two-stage revision (component removal, thorough debridement, antibiotic spacer, 6 weeks of IV antibiotics, then re-implantation) is the gold standard; single-stage revision is reserved for a low-virulence organism, no sinus tract and good bone stock (rare at the elbow); resection arthroplasty (a flail elbow) is a salvage option in the elderly low-demand patient and can be surprisingly functional; arthrodesis is technically demanding and rarely chosen. Revision TER principles. Image with CT pre-operatively to assess bone stock; use long-stemmed components to bypass stress risers and old cement; structural allograft for columnar defects; consider custom or tumour-type implants for severe bone loss. Counsel extensively — revision carries a 30-40 percent complication rate. Follow-up. Wound review and X-rays at 2 weeks; ROM, triceps strength and X-rays at 6 weeks; MEPS and cement-interface X-rays at 3 months, 6 months and 1 year; then annual AP and lateral X-rays to watch for migration, cement-mantle fracture, periprosthetic lucency, bushing wear (a widening gap between the linked components) and periprosthetic fracture. CT if loosening is suspected or revision is planned.

Viva & Exam Focus


Mnemonic

RULERULE — indications for total elbow replacement

R
Rheumatoid arthritis
Most common indication worldwide; Larsen grade 3-5; failed medical therapy; often bilateral
U
Unreconstructable distal humerus fracture
Comminuted intra-articular fracture in the elderly (usually over 65) where osteoporotic bone precludes stable ORIF; McKee 2008 RCT is the Level I evidence
L
Long-standing post-traumatic arthritis
End-stage arthritis after a previous fracture or dislocation; hardware removal is often first; consider arthrodesis in the young
E
End-stage primary OA (rare)
Uncommon; an older low-demand patient; avoid in the young active patient because of the activity restrictions
Mnemonic

LINKLINK — choosing linked versus unlinked

L
Linked for instability, RA, tumour or revision
Ligament deficiency, bone loss or instability needs a linked semiconstrained implant for inherent stability
I
Intact collateral ligaments — consider unlinked
If the MCL and LCL are intact and bone stock is adequate, an unlinked implant preserves more physiological kinematics
N
Normal bone stock required for unlinked
Unlinked designs depend entirely on soft-tissue balance; cavitary defects or column loss favour a linked design
K
Kinematics preserved with semiconstrained
Modern linked implants allow 7-8 degrees of laxity, reducing cement-interface stress versus a fully constrained design
Five danger zones around the elbow — know all five

Every structure here can be injured during a TER, and each is fair game in the viva. The ulnar nerve is the most commonly hit — anterior transposition is mandatory. Also protect the medial antebrachial cutaneous nerve, the radial nerve, the brachial artery and the triceps mechanism itself.

Ulnar nerve — most at risk

Posterior to the medial epicondyle in the cubital tunnel, then between the heads of FCU. At risk from traction, compression by prosthetic bulk, or scar entrapment. Prevent by identifying and anteriorly transposing it at the start and protecting it with a vessel loop. Palsy in 2-5 percent causes clawing of the ring and little fingers.

Radial nerve

Crosses the lateral intermuscular septum and passes anterior to the lateral epicondyle into the radial tunnel. At risk in aggressive anterior-capsule release, lateral retraction, or burring near the radial head. Stay posterior to the lateral epicondyle and avoid blunt retractors anterolaterally. Injury causes wrist drop.

Brachial artery

Passes through the antecubital fossa anterior to the elbow joint, medial to the biceps tendon, bifurcating into the radial and ulnar arteries at the neck of the radius. At risk in anterior-capsule release, aggressive retraction, or saw cuts. Avoid anterior retractors beyond the capsule and control the anterior dissection meticulously.

Medial antebrachial cutaneous nerve

A superficial sensory nerve that pierces the deep fascia proximal to the medial epicondyle and crosses anterior to it in the superficial fat. At risk at the skin incision, superficial dissection and retraction. Identify early and protect with gentle skin-hook retraction. Injury causes medial-forearm dysaesthesia and a painful neuroma.

Triceps mechanism (Bryan-Morrey)

The entire triceps-on approach depends on a secure periosteal-sleeve repair. Avulsion from the olecranon causes permanent extensor lag and functional failure. Reflect the sleeve sharply off the olecranon tip, reattach through bone tunnels with heavy non-absorbable suture (Krackow or Mason-Allen), and protect the repair for 6 weeks.

Clinical Decision Scenarios

Practise clinical reasoning and management decisions out loud

Viva scenarioAdvanced
Clinical prompt

“A 74-year-old woman with longstanding rheumatoid arthritis presents with bilateral elbow pain and inability to perform activities of daily living. Both elbows show Larsen grade 4 destruction. She is on methotrexate and etanercept. How do you manage her?”

Viva scenarioAdvanced
Clinical prompt

“A 47-year-old male construction worker sustains a comminuted distal humerus fracture. CT shows a three-part intra-articular fracture with poor bone quality (DEXA T-score minus 2.8). He is otherwise fit. Discuss your management including the evidence for TER versus ORIF.”

Viva scenarioAdvanced
Clinical prompt

“A patient returns 2 weeks after a total elbow replacement with wound breakdown over the posteromedial elbow — a 1 cm area of superficial skin loss with yellowish exudate. The elbow is warm but the patient is systemically well. How do you manage this?”

Exam day cheat sheet
Total elbow replacement — exam-day essentials

Indications (RULE)

  • Rheumatoid arthritis (most common; Larsen 3-5)
  • Unreconstructable comminuted distal humerus fracture in the elderly (McKee 2008 RCT; Cobb and Morrey 1997)
  • Long-standing post-traumatic arthritis
  • End-stage primary OA (rare)

Contraindications

  • Absolute: active infection, non-functional deltoid or biceps, young patient unwilling to accept restrictions, insufficient bone stock
  • Relative: prior osteomyelitis, neuropathic joint, young high-demand (under 50), BMI over 40

Implant choice (LINK)

  • Linked (Coonrad-Morrey) for instability, RA, tumour, revision
  • Unlinked (Kudo, Souter) needs intact ligaments and normal bone
  • 7-8 degrees of laxity reduces cement-interface stress
  • Register data: unlinked revision risk 1.9 times that of linked

The exposure — Bryan-Morrey

  • Posterior midline incision, curve medially at the olecranon tip
  • Ulnar nerve identified and anteriorly transposed FIRST
  • Continuous periosteal sleeve medial to lateral, includes the triceps insertion and anconeus
  • Repair through bone tunnels (Krackow or Mason-Allen), protect for 6 weeks

Cement & components

  • Third-generation cement: plug, lavage, retrograde pressurisation, 2-3 mm mantle
  • Link the components before the cement sets
  • Target 0-130 degrees flexion, full pronation-supination
  • Remove all posterior cement before it hardens

Danger zones

  • Ulnar nerve (most common injury; transposition mandatory)
  • Medial antebrachial cutaneous nerve (painful neuroma)
  • Radial nerve (wrist drop)
  • Brachial artery (anterior); triceps sleeve (avulsion)

Complications

  • Aseptic loosening 10-15% at 10 years (most common long-term)
  • Ulnar nerve palsy 2-5% (usually recovers by 3-6 months)
  • Wound or deep infection 3-7%
  • Triceps rupture 1-3%; bushing wear 3-5% at 10 years; periprosthetic fracture 3-5%

Lifetime restriction

  • Less than 5 kg single-lift for life
  • Less than 1 kg repetitive for life
  • No racquet sports, golf, contact sports or heavy manual work
  • Young patients (under 55) who cannot accept this are not candidates

Revision principles

  • 30-40% complication rate — counsel extensively
  • CT pre-operatively for bone stock
  • Long stems to bypass stress risers; structural allograft for columns
  • Two-stage revision for infection; resection arthroplasty as salvage

Background & Evidence


Outcome scoring — Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS). MEPS is the gold-standard outcome measure for TER and underpins every major published series. It scores four domains out of 100: pain (45 points, the largest domain), range of motion (20 points), stability (10 points) and function across six activities (25 points).

90-100
Rating
Excellent
75-89
Rating
Good
60-74
Rating
Fair
Less than 60
Rating
Poor
MEPS interpretation
ScoreRating
90-100Excellent
75-89Good
60-74Fair
Less than 60Poor

Radiographic staging — the Larsen classification. Larsen grades radiographic rheumatoid destruction on a 1-5 scale; grades 3-5 (moderate-to-severe articular destruction) are the radiographic threshold that brings a rheumatoid elbow into surgical consideration for TER. Disease begins with synovitis-driven cartilage and bone erosion around the ulnohumeral and radiocapitellar joints, progressing to joint-space loss, cysts, erosion and eventual instability and deformity (often valgus in RA). Epidemiology. Rheumatoid arthritis involves the elbow in a substantial proportion of patients over the disease course, and TER for RA is performed worldwide; RA remains the most common indication. Distal humerus fractures in the elderly are increasingly recognised as a TER indication as the population ages. Post-traumatic and primary-OA indications cluster in younger and older patients respectively, and both are smaller cohorts with inferior survivorship. Implant survival and the linked-versus-unlinked evidence. The linked Coonrad-Morrey prosthesis carries the most published long-term data. The seminal RA series (Morrey and Adams 1992) established efficacy and survivorship, and the 10-15 year follow-up (Gill and Morrey 1998) reported 92.4 percent implant survival with 86 percent good or excellent results. The post-traumatic cohort fares worse: Throckmorton 2010 found 75 percent of failures occurred in patients under 60, with 15-year survival of only 70 percent. The large register-linked Plaschke 2014 series (324 procedures) reported 5-year survival of 90 percent and 10-year survival of 81 percent, and a relative risk of revision of 1.9 for unlinked versus linked designs — the quantitative basis for preferring linked implants in most contemporary practice. No large RCT compares the two designs head to head; well-selected unlinked implants give similar functional outcomes but a higher instability risk.

References


Evidence

ORIF versus total elbow arthroplasty for displaced intra-articular distal humeral fractures in elderly patients (multicentre RCT)

Level I
McKee MD, Veillette CJH, Hall JA, et al. • J Shoulder Elbow Surg (2008)
Key Findings:
  • 42 patients over 65 with OTA 13C fractures randomised; 40 analysed (15 ORIF, 25 TER on-treatment)
  • 5 of 21 patients randomised to ORIF were converted to TER intra-operatively because stable fixation was unachievable
  • TER gave significantly higher Mayo Elbow Performance Scores at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months (86 versus 73 at 2 years)
  • Reoperation rate 12% (TER) versus 27% (ORIF) — not statistically significant; TER operative time about 32 minutes shorter
Clinical implication: Provides the Level I basis for choosing primary semiconstrained TER over ORIF in elderly patients with unreconstructable comminuted intra-articular distal humeral fractures.
Verify on PubMed (PMID 18823799)
Evidence

Total elbow arthroplasty as primary treatment for distal humeral fractures in elderly patients

Level IV
Cobb TK, Morrey BF • J Bone Joint Surg Am (1997)
Key Findings:
  • Retrospective series of 20 patients (21 elbows), mean age 72 years, treated with primary TER for acute distal humeral fracture
  • 15 excellent and 5 good results by Mayo Elbow Performance Score; mean flexion arc 25 to 130 degrees
  • Only one revision (fractured ulnar component after a fall); no radiographic loosening at follow-up
  • Authors explicitly state TER is NOT an alternative to osteosynthesis in younger patients
Clinical implication: The foundational case series that first established primary TER for acute comminuted distal humeral fracture in the low-demand elderly patient; a series, not a comparative trial.
Verify on PubMed (PMID 9199378)
Evidence

The Coonrad-Morrey total elbow arthroplasty in rheumatoid arthritis — a ten to fifteen-year follow-up

Level IV
Gill DR, Morrey BF • J Bone Joint Surg Am (1998)
Key Findings:
  • 78 elbows in 69 RA patients followed up to 10-15 years after Coonrad-Morrey linked semiconstrained TER
  • 92.4% implant survival; 86% good or excellent and 14% fair or poor by Mayo Elbow Performance Score
  • 97% of elbows were pain-free or only mildly painful; mean flexion arc 28 to 131 degrees
  • Complications in 14% (triceps avulsion, infection, ulnar fracture); 7% of bushings completely worn
Clinical implication: Establishes durable long-term pain relief and high survivorship of the linked semiconstrained design in the rheumatoid elbow — the benchmark TER outcome data.
Verify on PubMed (PMID 9759818)
Evidence

Failure patterns after linked semiconstrained total elbow arthroplasty for posttraumatic arthritis

Level IV
Throckmorton T, Zarkadas P, Sanchez-Sotelo J, Morrey B • J Bone Joint Surg Am (2010)
Key Findings:
  • 85 semiconstrained TERs for post-traumatic arthritis; 19% of primary implants failed at mean 9-year follow-up
  • 15-year survival 70% with revision or resection as the end point — markedly worse than RA cohorts
  • 75% of failures occurred in patients under 60 years of age (p = 0.03)
  • Early failure most often infection; intermediate failure typically bushing wear; late failure loosening or fracture
Clinical implication: Quantifies the higher failure rate of TER in the younger, higher-demand post-traumatic patient and underpins strict activity-restriction counselling.
Verify on PubMed (PMID 20516319)
Evidence

Implant survival after total elbow arthroplasty — a retrospective study of 324 procedures (1980-2008)

Level III
Plaschke HC, Thillemann TM, Brorson S, Olsen BS • J Shoulder Elbow Surg (2014)
Key Findings:
  • 324 primary TER procedures in 234 patients (eastern Denmark), mean follow-up 8.7 years, register-linked
  • Overall 5-year survival 90% and 10-year survival 81%
  • Unlinked designs carried a relative risk of revision of 1.9 versus linked designs
  • Fracture sequelae as an indication carried a relative risk of revision of 1.9
Clinical implication: Large register-linked cohort confirming acceptable medium-term survival and supporting the preference for linked over unlinked implants in most contemporary practice.
Verify on PubMed (PMID 24766794)
Evidence

Semiconstrained arthroplasty for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis of the elbow

Morrey BF, Adams RA • J Bone Joint Surg Am (1992)

Foundational study of the Coonrad-Morrey implant in rheumatoid arthritis, establishing its efficacy and the survivorship data that subsequent long-term series built on.

Evidence

Long-term results of the GSB III elbow arthroplasty

Gschwend N, Scheier NH, Baehler AR • J Bone Joint Surg Br (1999)

Long-term European data on a semiconstrained TER in inflammatory arthritis, demonstrating survivorship comparable to the Coonrad-Morrey.

Evidence

Semiconstrained total elbow arthroplasty for ankylosed and stiff elbows

Mansat P, Morrey BF • J Bone Joint Surg Am (2000)

Extended TER indications to the stiff or ankylosed elbow, with good functional outcomes.

Evidence

Extensive posterior exposure of the elbow — a triceps-sparing approach

Bryan RS, Morrey BF • Clin Orthop Relat Res (1982)

The original description of the Bryan-Morrey triceps-on approach — the foundational technical paper for the exposure used throughout this guide.

Evidence

Linked total elbow arthroplasty as salvage for distal humeral nonunion

Sanchez-Sotelo J, Morrey BF • J Bone Joint Surg Br (2002)

Evidence for TER as a salvage procedure after failed ORIF of distal humerus fractures presenting as nonunion.

Evidence

Semiconstrained primary and revision total elbow arthroplasty with the Coonrad-Morrey prosthesis

Shi LL, Zurakowski D, Jones DG, Koris MJ, Thornhill TS • J Bone Joint Surg Am (2007)

Comparative analysis of primary versus revision TER outcomes with the linked semiconstrained implant.

Editorially reviewed — transparent references and correction processPublished by OrthoVellum Medical Education TeamEditorial boardMethodologyReview policy
Educational disclosure

Educational content is reviewed for source visibility, editorial coherence, and correction readiness.

No individual clinician credential is claimed unless a named person is shown.

Verify before clinical use; this is not medical advice or a substitute for local guidance.

Procedure console
20 min
Read
0
Sections
advanced
Level
Peer-reviewed · 2026-06-20
Procedure info
Level
advanced
Read time
20 min
Updated
2026-06-20
SURGICAL APPROACHES USED
Posterior Approach to the Elbow
Browse all procedures