Lateral approach ORIF with headless compression screws for displaced capitellar and coronal shear fractures of the distal humerus | advanced
Surgical Imaging

The trap: Treat the anterior fragment like a piece of cortical bone that can be liberally debrided and mobilised. The blood supply enters from the posterior condyle (radial collateral and recurrent interosseous vessels) — the fragment is largely cartilaginous and depends on the soft-tissue hinge and the cancellous bed for revascularisation.
The fix: Reduce the fragment with the attached anterior capsule as a soft-tissue hinge. Do not skeletonise the fragment. Place screws (or use a small bioabsorbable pin) without circumferential soft-tissue stripping. If AVN occurs, it is generally well tolerated because the fragment is contained by the condylar shell.
The trap: Detaching the LUCL origin from the lateral epicondyle to gain exposure and not repairing it. The LUCL is the primary restraint to posterolateral rotatory instability (PLRI). Loss of the LUCL produces a 'pivot shift' under anaesthesia and a chronically unstable elbow.
The fix: Identify the LUCL origin (isometric point on the lateral epicondyle) and protect it during the approach. If it is detached, reattach through trans-osseous bone tunnels or suture anchors at the isometric point before wound closure. Test with a pivot-shift under anaesthesia at the end of the case.
The trap: Always drilling anterior-to-posterior (AP). The direction of screw insertion depends on the fragment geometry and the integrity of the posterior condylar wall. For Hahn-Steinthal whole-capitellum fragments the posterior cortex is usually intact and AP insertion is safe. For fragments with a posterior exit point or comminution, AP insertion risks intra-articular screw prominence.
The fix: Trace the fracture line on CT preoperatively. Use posterior-to-anterior (PA) insertion when the fragment has a clean posterior exit point and the anterior condyle is the larger intact surface. Confirm all screws are intra-osseous and buried beneath the articular cartilage on fluoroscopy — never leave a proud screw in a weight-bearing zone of the capitellum.
The trap: Calling a 'capitellar fracture' and missing the lateral trochlear ridge component. On a true lateral elbow radiograph, two parallel arcs are seen when both the capitellum and the lateral trochlear ridge are sheared: the outer arc is the capitellum, the inner arc is the lateral trochlear ridge (Bryan-Morrey type IV / Dubberley type B).
The fix: Obtain a CT scan for ALL coronal shear fractures. Look for trochlear involvement and posterior condylar comminution (Dubberley suffix '2' or '3'). Trochlear involvement changes the approach — posterior comminution often requires a medial or posterior approach for plating the column and may need a second incision.
The trap: Treating the capitellar fragment in isolation and missing the radial head fracture, coronoid fracture, or LCL injury that is often present (the 'terrible triad' or the 'Mason IV' pattern). The same axial-load mechanism that produces the coronal shear drives the radial head into the capitellum.
The fix: Examine the radial head, the coronoid (on CT) and the ligaments clinically under anaesthesia BEFORE planning fixation. A radial head fracture that is non-reconstructable (Mason III with greater than 3 fragments) may need replacement rather than fixation; a coronoid tip fracture less than 50 percent of height may be left if elbow is stable; LCL repair is usually required if the elbow subluxates on examination.
The trap: Trying to fix a Kocher-Lorenz thin cartilage flake with screws or K-wires. The fragment is essentially cartilage with a wafer of subchondral bone; it is too thin to hold a headless screw and will fragment further on attempted fixation.
The fix: When the fragment is non-reconstructable (Kocher-Lorenz, Dubberley A2 in an elderly patient) — excise the fragment and treat the donor bed. Decision is made intra-operatively after visual inspection. If the donor bed is large, consider a bone graft or chondral graft as a delayed procedure; functional outcomes after excision in low-demand patients are acceptable.
C.A.P.I.TCAPIT — Capitellar Anatomy and the Surgical Window
R.E.D.U.C.EREDUCE — Operative Sequence for Coronal Shear ORIF
D.U.B.B.E.RDUBBER — Dubberley Classification of Coronal Shear Fractures
Surgical Indications
Absolute Indications
- Displaced coronal shear fracture (articular step greater than 2 mm, or any rotational malalignment that blocks motion) — the articular step-off at the radiocapitellar joint accelerates post-traumatic arthritis
- Locking or blocking of flexion / extension by a rotated capitellar fragment — a common presentation; the rotated fragment impinges in the coronoid / radial fossa
- Hahn-Steinthal whole-capitellum fracture in any age group with a reconstructable fragment — fixation is preferred to excision because excision produces radial-migration and proximal radial instability
- Dubberley type A1, A2, B1, B2 in the active patient — lateral approach ORIF is the standard of care
- Open fracture — urgent irrigation, debridement, and ORIF; antibiotic cover; assess for compartment syndrome
Relative Indications
- Small, non-reconstructable cartilage flake (Kocher-Lorenz) in a low-demand elderly patient — fragment excision with symptom-driven treatment is a reasonable alternative
- Comminuted capitellum with extensive posterior wall involvement (Dubberley type A3 or B3) — consider staged ORIF versus primary fragment excision and early total elbow arthroplasty in the very low-demand elderly patient
- Associated elbow dislocation that has been reduced — the ligamentous injury must be addressed; fixation of the capitellar fragment alone is insufficient
Contraindications
Absolute:
- Active elbow sepsis — infection must be cleared before ORIF (or convert to excision and antibiotic spacer)
- Patient medically unfit for surgery
Relative:
- Very low-demand elderly patient with a comminuted unreconstructable capitellar and trochlear injury — consider acute total elbow arthroplasty
- Established post-traumatic arthritis with loss of cartilage on the donor condyle — fixation cannot restore a destroyed joint surface
- Severe osteoporosis that prevents stable screw purchase — consider suture fixation or fragment excision
Evidence for Operative Treatment
Outcomes of ORIF — Modern Series
- ORIF of displaced coronal shear fractures restores a congruent radiocapitellar joint in the majority of patients, with reported good-to-excellent functional outcomes (Broberg-Morrey scores in the good-to-excellent range) in approximately 70-90 percent of patients in modern series
- Functional arc of motion is restored in the majority of patients, although the mean flexion-extension arc achieved is typically less than the uninjured elbow by 10-30 degrees
- The strongest predictor of outcome is the QUALITY OF THE INITIAL REDUCTION: an articular step greater than 2 mm correlates strongly with the development of post-traumatic arthritis and poor functional outcome
- Avascular necrosis of the capitellar fragment is reported in 0-25 percent of cases across series; clinically significant AVN requiring further surgery is uncommon because the surrounding condylar shell contains the fragment
Evidence for Headless Compression Screw Fixation
- Headless compression screws (Herbert, Acutrak, Mini-Acutrak) have become the implant of choice because the differential thread pitch produces interfragmentary compression AND the screws can be buried beneath the articular cartilage, avoiding intra-articular prominence
- Biomechanical studies show that headless compression screws provide superior initial stability to K-wires and to bioabsorbable pins in coronal shear fragments
- Two to three screws are typical; the trajectory (AP versus PA) is determined by the fragment geometry and the integrity of the posterior condylar cortex
- For very small or osteoporotic fragments, supplementary fixation with mini-fragment plates, suture anchors, or bioabsorbable pins has been described — outcomes are more variable
Comparison: ORIF vs Fragment Excision
- Modern series favour ORIF over excision for all reconstructable fragments because ORIF restores radiocapitellar congruity and prevents proximal radial migration
- Excision is reserved for non-reconstructable fragments (Kocher-Lorenz thin cartilage flake; severely comminuted fragments in low-demand patients)
- Long-term follow-up of ORIF shows progressive post-traumatic arthritis in a subset of patients — this appears to be more closely related to the INITIAL ARTICULAR INJURY (cartilage damage at the time of impact) than to the fixation technique
ORIF versus Fragment Excision — Evidence Summary
Key Evidence
Outcome after open reduction and internal fixation of capitellar and trochlear fractures
Open reduction and internal fixation of capitellar fractures with headless screws
Coronal shear fractures of the distal humerus
Large coronal shear fractures of the capitellum and trochlea treated with headless compression screws
Fractures of the capitellum and trochlea: long-term outcome
Clinical Decision Scenarios
Practise clinical reasoning and management decisions out loud
“A 32-year-old right-hand-dominant woman falls on an outstretched hand and presents with a painful, swollen elbow. Imaging shows a displaced capitellar fracture with the lateral trochlear ridge involved. CT confirms a Hahn-Steinthal fragment with the posterior condyle intact. Walk me through your management plan.”
“A 58-year-old man presents 4 weeks after a fall with a missed capitellar fracture. He has 30 degrees of fixed flexion deformity and pain on attempted flexion beyond 90 degrees. CT shows a healed, displaced capitellar fragment. He is low-demand (office worker, no sport). What are your options?”
“A 24-year-old competitive rugby player presents with a coronal shear fracture and an associated Mason III radial head fracture with 4 fragments. The elbow is stable under anaesthesia. What is your surgical plan?”
References
-
Dubberley JH, Faber KJ, Macdermid JC, Patterson SD, King GJ (2006). Outcome after open reduction and internal fixation of capitellar and trochlear fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am;88(1):46-54. doi:10.2106/JBJS.D.02954. — Original description of the Dubberley classification of coronal shear fractures; cohort study establishing ORIF outcomes.
-
Ruchelsman DE, Tejwani NC, Kwon YW, Egol KA (2008). Open reduction and internal fixation of capitellar fractures with headless screws. J Bone Joint Surg Am;90(6):1321-9. doi:10.2106/JBJS.G.00940. — Modern technique paper establishing headless compression screws as the standard implant for ORIF of capitellar fractures.
-
McKee MD, Jupiter JB, Bamberger HB (1996). Coronal shear fractures of the distal end of the humerus. J Bone Joint Surg Am;78(1):49-54. doi:10.2106/00004623-199601000-00007. — Description of the coronal shear pattern and the role of ORIF; emphasises the importance of CT in preoperative planning.
-
Mighell M, Virani NA, Shannon R, Echols EL, Badman BL, Keating CJ (2010). Large coronal shear fractures of the capitellum and trochlea treated with headless compression screws. J Shoulder Elbow Surg;19(1):38-45. doi:10.1016/j.jse.2009.05.012. — Cohort study of ORIF for large coronal shear fractures extending to the trochlea; good-to-excellent functional outcomes in the majority.
-
Guitton TG, Doornberg JN, Raaymakers EL, Ring D, Kloen P (2009). Fractures of the capitellum and trochlea. J Bone Joint Surg Am;91(2):390-7. doi:10.2106/JBJS.G.01660. — Long-term follow-up cohort establishing ORIF as preferred over excision for reconstructable fragments.