Capitellum and Coronal Shear Fracture ORIF

Hand & WristAdvancedCore Procedure

Capitellum and Coronal Shear Fracture ORIF

Surgical technique guide for open reduction and internal fixation of capitellar and coronal shear fractures of the distal humerus — lateral approach, headless compression screw fixation, fragment-specific decisions and early motion

High-yield overview

Lateral approach ORIF with headless compression screws for displaced capitellar and coronal shear fractures of the distal humerus | advanced

Surgical Imaging

Capitellum coronal shear screw fixation
Capitellar coronal shear fracture fixed with buried antero-posterior headless compression screws.Credit: AI-generated medical illustration · OrthoVellum
Critical Danger Structures and Exam Traps
Capitellum Blood Supply — Tenuous, Posterior

The trap: Treat the anterior fragment like a piece of cortical bone that can be liberally debrided and mobilised. The blood supply enters from the posterior condyle (radial collateral and recurrent interosseous vessels) — the fragment is largely cartilaginous and depends on the soft-tissue hinge and the cancellous bed for revascularisation.

The fix: Reduce the fragment with the attached anterior capsule as a soft-tissue hinge. Do not skeletonise the fragment. Place screws (or use a small bioabsorbable pin) without circumferential soft-tissue stripping. If AVN occurs, it is generally well tolerated because the fragment is contained by the condylar shell.

Lateral Ulnar Collateral Ligament (LUCL) — Posterolateral Pivot

The trap: Detaching the LUCL origin from the lateral epicondyle to gain exposure and not repairing it. The LUCL is the primary restraint to posterolateral rotatory instability (PLRI). Loss of the LUCL produces a 'pivot shift' under anaesthesia and a chronically unstable elbow.

The fix: Identify the LUCL origin (isometric point on the lateral epicondyle) and protect it during the approach. If it is detached, reattach through trans-osseous bone tunnels or suture anchors at the isometric point before wound closure. Test with a pivot-shift under anaesthesia at the end of the case.

Screw Direction — Fragment Specific

The trap: Always drilling anterior-to-posterior (AP). The direction of screw insertion depends on the fragment geometry and the integrity of the posterior condylar wall. For Hahn-Steinthal whole-capitellum fragments the posterior cortex is usually intact and AP insertion is safe. For fragments with a posterior exit point or comminution, AP insertion risks intra-articular screw prominence.

The fix: Trace the fracture line on CT preoperatively. Use posterior-to-anterior (PA) insertion when the fragment has a clean posterior exit point and the anterior condyle is the larger intact surface. Confirm all screws are intra-osseous and buried beneath the articular cartilage on fluoroscopy — never leave a proud screw in a weight-bearing zone of the capitellum.

Double Arc Sign — Lateral Trochlear Involvement

The trap: Calling a 'capitellar fracture' and missing the lateral trochlear ridge component. On a true lateral elbow radiograph, two parallel arcs are seen when both the capitellum and the lateral trochlear ridge are sheared: the outer arc is the capitellum, the inner arc is the lateral trochlear ridge (Bryan-Morrey type IV / Dubberley type B).

The fix: Obtain a CT scan for ALL coronal shear fractures. Look for trochlear involvement and posterior condylar comminution (Dubberley suffix '2' or '3'). Trochlear involvement changes the approach — posterior comminution often requires a medial or posterior approach for plating the column and may need a second incision.

Associated Radial Head / Coronoid Injury

The trap: Treating the capitellar fragment in isolation and missing the radial head fracture, coronoid fracture, or LCL injury that is often present (the 'terrible triad' or the 'Mason IV' pattern). The same axial-load mechanism that produces the coronal shear drives the radial head into the capitellum.

The fix: Examine the radial head, the coronoid (on CT) and the ligaments clinically under anaesthesia BEFORE planning fixation. A radial head fracture that is non-reconstructable (Mason III with greater than 3 fragments) may need replacement rather than fixation; a coronoid tip fracture less than 50 percent of height may be left if elbow is stable; LCL repair is usually required if the elbow subluxates on examination.

Kocher-Lorenz Thin Cartilage Flake — Excise, Don't Fix

The trap: Trying to fix a Kocher-Lorenz thin cartilage flake with screws or K-wires. The fragment is essentially cartilage with a wafer of subchondral bone; it is too thin to hold a headless screw and will fragment further on attempted fixation.

The fix: When the fragment is non-reconstructable (Kocher-Lorenz, Dubberley A2 in an elderly patient) — excise the fragment and treat the donor bed. Decision is made intra-operatively after visual inspection. If the donor bed is large, consider a bone graft or chondral graft as a delayed procedure; functional outcomes after excision in low-demand patients are acceptable.

Mnemonic

C.A.P.I.TCAPIT — Capitellar Anatomy and the Surgical Window

Mnemonic

R.E.D.U.C.EREDUCE — Operative Sequence for Coronal Shear ORIF

Mnemonic

D.U.B.B.E.RDUBBER — Dubberley Classification of Coronal Shear Fractures

Surgical Indications

Absolute Indications

  • Displaced coronal shear fracture (articular step greater than 2 mm, or any rotational malalignment that blocks motion) — the articular step-off at the radiocapitellar joint accelerates post-traumatic arthritis
  • Locking or blocking of flexion / extension by a rotated capitellar fragment — a common presentation; the rotated fragment impinges in the coronoid / radial fossa
  • Hahn-Steinthal whole-capitellum fracture in any age group with a reconstructable fragment — fixation is preferred to excision because excision produces radial-migration and proximal radial instability
  • Dubberley type A1, A2, B1, B2 in the active patient — lateral approach ORIF is the standard of care
  • Open fracture — urgent irrigation, debridement, and ORIF; antibiotic cover; assess for compartment syndrome

Relative Indications

  • Small, non-reconstructable cartilage flake (Kocher-Lorenz) in a low-demand elderly patient — fragment excision with symptom-driven treatment is a reasonable alternative
  • Comminuted capitellum with extensive posterior wall involvement (Dubberley type A3 or B3) — consider staged ORIF versus primary fragment excision and early total elbow arthroplasty in the very low-demand elderly patient
  • Associated elbow dislocation that has been reduced — the ligamentous injury must be addressed; fixation of the capitellar fragment alone is insufficient

Contraindications

Absolute:

  • Active elbow sepsis — infection must be cleared before ORIF (or convert to excision and antibiotic spacer)
  • Patient medically unfit for surgery

Relative:

  • Very low-demand elderly patient with a comminuted unreconstructable capitellar and trochlear injury — consider acute total elbow arthroplasty
  • Established post-traumatic arthritis with loss of cartilage on the donor condyle — fixation cannot restore a destroyed joint surface
  • Severe osteoporosis that prevents stable screw purchase — consider suture fixation or fragment excision

Evidence for Operative Treatment

Outcomes of ORIF — Modern Series

  • ORIF of displaced coronal shear fractures restores a congruent radiocapitellar joint in the majority of patients, with reported good-to-excellent functional outcomes (Broberg-Morrey scores in the good-to-excellent range) in approximately 70-90 percent of patients in modern series
  • Functional arc of motion is restored in the majority of patients, although the mean flexion-extension arc achieved is typically less than the uninjured elbow by 10-30 degrees
  • The strongest predictor of outcome is the QUALITY OF THE INITIAL REDUCTION: an articular step greater than 2 mm correlates strongly with the development of post-traumatic arthritis and poor functional outcome
  • Avascular necrosis of the capitellar fragment is reported in 0-25 percent of cases across series; clinically significant AVN requiring further surgery is uncommon because the surrounding condylar shell contains the fragment

Evidence for Headless Compression Screw Fixation

  • Headless compression screws (Herbert, Acutrak, Mini-Acutrak) have become the implant of choice because the differential thread pitch produces interfragmentary compression AND the screws can be buried beneath the articular cartilage, avoiding intra-articular prominence
  • Biomechanical studies show that headless compression screws provide superior initial stability to K-wires and to bioabsorbable pins in coronal shear fragments
  • Two to three screws are typical; the trajectory (AP versus PA) is determined by the fragment geometry and the integrity of the posterior condylar cortex
  • For very small or osteoporotic fragments, supplementary fixation with mini-fragment plates, suture anchors, or bioabsorbable pins has been described — outcomes are more variable

Comparison: ORIF vs Fragment Excision

  • Modern series favour ORIF over excision for all reconstructable fragments because ORIF restores radiocapitellar congruity and prevents proximal radial migration
  • Excision is reserved for non-reconstructable fragments (Kocher-Lorenz thin cartilage flake; severely comminuted fragments in low-demand patients)
  • Long-term follow-up of ORIF shows progressive post-traumatic arthritis in a subset of patients — this appears to be more closely related to the INITIAL ARTICULAR INJURY (cartilage damage at the time of impact) than to the fixation technique

ORIF versus Fragment Excision — Evidence Summary


Key Evidence

Evidence

Outcome after open reduction and internal fixation of capitellar and trochlear fractures

Level IV
Dubberley JH, Faber KJ, Macdermid JC, Patterson SD, King GJJ Bone Joint Surg Am
Clinical implication: The Dubberley classification is the framework for choosing the surgical approach — single lateral approach for type 1, lateral plus medial or posterior exposure for type 2-3.
Evidence

Open reduction and internal fixation of capitellar fractures with headless screws

Level IV
Ruchelsman DE, Tejwani NC, Kwon YW, Egol KAJ Bone Joint Surg Am
Clinical implication: Headless compression screws are the modern standard for ORIF of capitellar fractures — the differential thread pitch provides interfragmentary compression without intra-articular prominence.
Evidence

Coronal shear fractures of the distal humerus

Level IV
McKee MD, Jupiter JB, Bamberger HBJ Bone Joint Surg Am
Clinical implication: CT is mandatory in the workup of coronal shear fractures — the lateral radiograph underestimates the size of the fragment and misses trochlear involvement.
Evidence

Large coronal shear fractures of the capitellum and trochlea treated with headless compression screws

Level IV
Mighell M, Virani NA, Shannon R, Echols EL, Badman BL, Keating CJJ Shoulder Elbow Surg
Clinical implication: ORIF with headless compression screws is effective for large coronal shear fractures extending to the trochlea — anticipate a 10-20% re-operation rate for stiffness, and counsel the patient accordingly.
Evidence

Fractures of the capitellum and trochlea: long-term outcome

Level IV
Guitton TG, Doornberg JN, Raaymakers EL, Ring D, Kloen PJ Bone Joint Surg Am
Clinical implication: ORIF is the preferred treatment for reconstructable capitellar and trochlear fractures; radiographic post-traumatic arthritis does not always become clinically symptomatic, so radiographic findings alone should not prompt re-operation.

Clinical Decision Scenarios

Practise clinical reasoning and management decisions out loud

Viva scenarioAdvanced
Clinical prompt

A 32-year-old right-hand-dominant woman falls on an outstretched hand and presents with a painful, swollen elbow. Imaging shows a displaced capitellar fracture with the lateral trochlear ridge involved. CT confirms a Hahn-Steinthal fragment with the posterior condyle intact. Walk me through your management plan.

Practical approach
This is a displaced coronal shear fracture of the distal humerus involving both the capitellum and the lateral trochlear ridge — a Dubberley type B1 (capitellum plus trochlea, posterior wall intact). The standard treatment is ORIF through a lateral approach with headless compression screws. **Pre-operative plan**: I would obtain a CT scan to confirm the size of the fragment, the integrity of the posterior condyle, and the absence of associated radial head or coronoid injury. I would examine the patient under anaesthesia before draping to assess ligamentous stability (varus, valgus, pivot-shift) and to confirm the diagnosis. I would counsel the patient regarding the risks of avascular necrosis (0-25% in series), stiffness (10-30% have residual loss of motion), post-traumatic arthritis (20-40% at 5 years), and the possibility of re-operation for capsular release or hardware removal. **Operative plan**: Supine position with the arm on a hand table, upper-arm tourniquet, and fluoroscopy on the opposite side. A lateral Kocher approach between the anconeus and the extensor carpi ulnaris, with identification and protection of the LUCL at its origin on the lateral epicondyle. Anterior capsulotomy to expose the rotated anterior fragment. Fracture bed preparation with irrigation and removal of haematoma. Reduction of the capitellar and trochlear fragments using a dental pick and provisional K-wire fixation. Definitive fixation with 2-3 headless compression screws (2.0 or 2.4 mm Acutrak) from anterior to posterior, with the screw heads buried beneath the articular cartilage. Multi-plane fluoroscopy to confirm reduction and screw position. Assessment of ligamentous stability, with LUCL reattachment if detached. Closure over a suction drain, back-slab in extension. **Post-operative plan**: Indomethacin 25 mg three times daily for 3-6 weeks for heterotopic ossification prophylaxis. Back-slab in extension for 24-48 hours, then active assisted ROM supervised by a hand therapist. Suture removal at 10-14 days. Strengthening at 6-8 weeks. Return to heavy work at 3-6 months. Radiographic follow-up at 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 6 months, and 12 months to monitor for AVN and post-traumatic arthritis.
Viva scenarioAdvanced
Clinical prompt

A 58-year-old man presents 4 weeks after a fall with a missed capitellar fracture. He has 30 degrees of fixed flexion deformity and pain on attempted flexion beyond 90 degrees. CT shows a healed, displaced capitellar fragment. He is low-demand (office worker, no sport). What are your options?

Practical approach
This is a missed, malunited capitellar fracture presenting 4 weeks after injury. The fragment has healed in a displaced position and is now blocking flexion. The decision between ORIF, fragment excision, and non-operative management depends on the patient's symptoms, demands, the size and location of the malunited fragment, and the state of the articular cartilage. **Non-operative management**: A 4-week-old malunited capitellar fragment is a fixed mechanical block. Continued non-operative management would not improve motion. The patient has a 30-degree fixed flexion deformity and a 90-degree flexion block — this is functionally limiting and warrants intervention. **Surgical options**: - **Late ORIF of the malunited fragment**: technically demanding at 4 weeks because the fracture has callus and the fragment has begun to revascularise. Possible in the active patient if the fragment is reconstructable and the donor site is intact. Mobilisation of the fragment risks further devascularisation and AVN. - **Fragment excision**: a reasonable option in a low-demand patient. The capitellum is excised through a lateral approach, and the patient is mobilised early. The radiocapitellar joint loses some congruence, but the ulnohumeral joint (the more important joint for flexion-extension) is preserved. Outcomes in low-demand patients are acceptable. - **Anterior capsular release alone**: if the fragment is not the primary block and the limitation is from anterior capsule contracture, an arthroscopic or open capsular release may improve motion. However, the displaced fragment is the more likely primary problem here. - **Total elbow arthroplasty**: a salvage option for the very low-demand patient with extensive comminution and established post-traumatic arthritis. Not indicated in this patient who has an isolated, addressable problem. **My recommendation**: For this 58-year-old office worker (low-demand, no sport), I would offer **fragment excision** through a lateral approach. The risks of late ORIF (AVN, fixation failure) are higher than the risks of excision (loss of radiocapitellar congruity, mild proximal radial migration), and the functional outcome is acceptable. I would combine this with an anterior capsular release to address the flexion contracture. Post-operative: early motion with indomethacin for HO prophylaxis, hand therapy for 6-12 weeks. If the patient were 28 years old, active in sport, and high-demand, I would offer **late ORIF** of the fragment, despite the technical difficulty, to preserve the radiocapitellar joint.
Viva scenarioAdvanced
Clinical prompt

A 24-year-old competitive rugby player presents with a coronal shear fracture and an associated Mason III radial head fracture with 4 fragments. The elbow is stable under anaesthesia. What is your surgical plan?

Practical approach
This is a coronal shear fracture of the capitellum with an associated comminuted radial head fracture — a high-energy combined injury. The radial head is non-reconstructable (4 fragments). In a 24-year-old competitive rugby player, the goal is to restore a stable, congruent elbow that will tolerate high-demand loading. **Pre-operative considerations**: I would obtain a CT scan with 3D reconstruction to assess the radial head fragments, the integrity of the coronoid, and any posterior condylar comminution. I would examine the elbow under anaesthesia to confirm stability — if the elbow is grossly unstable, the algorithm changes (likely needs a medial repair, an external fixator, or both). **Operative plan — capitellum**: A single lateral approach (Kocher or Kaplan interval) addresses both the capitellar fragment and the radial head. I would ORIF the capitellum first, as it is the larger reconstructable surface, with 2-3 headless compression screws from anterior to posterior. I would protect the LUCL throughout and reattach it trans-osseously at the end if detached. **Operative plan — radial head**: With 4 fragments, the radial head is non-reconstructable. In a 24-year-old high-demand patient, I would **NOT excise the radial head** — this produces proximal radial migration, wrist pain (because the radial column is shortened), and loss of grip strength. The two options are: - **Metallic radial head arthroplasty**: a smooth-stemmed, modular metallic radial head replacement (e.g. Acumed, Synthes, or Wright Medical systems). The size is chosen to match the native radial head as measured from the contralateral elbow on x-ray, and the height is set to reproduce the native radiocapitellar alignment. Oversizing is a common error — produces radiocapitellar pain and stiffness. - **Radial head ORIF**: if the fragments can be reconstructed (more than 2-3 fragments, ORIF outcomes are generally poor with high rates of non-union and hardware failure; the 4-fragment radial head is at the limit of reconstructability). **My choice**: For this 24-year-old rugby player, I would perform a **metallic radial head arthroplasty** in the same setting as the capitellar ORIF. The capitellum is fixed first, then the radial head is excised and replaced. **Ligamentous assessment**: At the end of the procedure, I would test stability under fluoroscopy (varus, valgus, pivot-shift). If the elbow is unstable despite the radial head replacement and the LCL repair, I would consider: - Repair of the medial collateral ligament through a separate medial approach - A hinged external fixator for 4-6 weeks to protect the repair **Post-operative plan**: Back-slab in extension for 24-48 hours, then active assisted ROM. Indomethacin 25 mg three times daily for 3-6 weeks for HO prophylaxis (high-risk patient — rugby, combined injury). Hand therapy for 6-12 weeks. Return to rugby at 6-9 months, with counselling about the risk of post-traumatic arthritis and the need for ongoing surveillance.
Exam day cheat sheet
Capitellum and Coronal Shear Fracture ORIF — Exam Day Summary

References

  1. Dubberley JH, Faber KJ, Macdermid JC, Patterson SD, King GJ (2006). Outcome after open reduction and internal fixation of capitellar and trochlear fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am;88(1):46-54. doi:10.2106/JBJS.D.02954. — Original description of the Dubberley classification of coronal shear fractures; cohort study establishing ORIF outcomes.

  2. Ruchelsman DE, Tejwani NC, Kwon YW, Egol KA (2008). Open reduction and internal fixation of capitellar fractures with headless screws. J Bone Joint Surg Am;90(6):1321-9. doi:10.2106/JBJS.G.00940. — Modern technique paper establishing headless compression screws as the standard implant for ORIF of capitellar fractures.

  3. McKee MD, Jupiter JB, Bamberger HB (1996). Coronal shear fractures of the distal end of the humerus. J Bone Joint Surg Am;78(1):49-54. doi:10.2106/00004623-199601000-00007. — Description of the coronal shear pattern and the role of ORIF; emphasises the importance of CT in preoperative planning.

  4. Mighell M, Virani NA, Shannon R, Echols EL, Badman BL, Keating CJ (2010). Large coronal shear fractures of the capitellum and trochlea treated with headless compression screws. J Shoulder Elbow Surg;19(1):38-45. doi:10.1016/j.jse.2009.05.012. — Cohort study of ORIF for large coronal shear fractures extending to the trochlea; good-to-excellent functional outcomes in the majority.

  5. Guitton TG, Doornberg JN, Raaymakers EL, Ring D, Kloen P (2009). Fractures of the capitellum and trochlea. J Bone Joint Surg Am;91(2):390-7. doi:10.2106/JBJS.G.01660. — Long-term follow-up cohort establishing ORIF as preferred over excision for reconstructable fragments.

Editorially reviewed — transparent references and correction processPublished by OrthoVellum Medical Education TeamEditorial boardMethodologyReview policy
Educational disclosure

Educational content is reviewed for source visibility, editorial coherence, and correction readiness.

No individual clinician credential is claimed unless a named person is shown.

Verify before clinical use; this is not medical advice or a substitute for local guidance.