Approach to the Clavicle (Superior and Anteroinferior)

TraumaIntermediateCore Procedure

Approach to the Clavicle (Superior and Anteroinferior)

Comprehensive guide to the surgical approaches to the clavicular shaft for advanced orthopaedic practice and advanced orthopaedic practice - beach chair positioning, superior versus anteroinferior incisions and plate-position trade-offs, platysma and supraclavicular nerve protection, the internervous plane, danger structures including the subclavian vessels and pleura, extensile options and closure for Orthopaedic exam

High-yield overview

Superior or Anteroinferior | Subcutaneous Bone | Supraclavicular Nerves at Risk

Greater than 2 cmShortening that indicates ORIF for midshaft fractures
Up to ~20%Nonunion risk with displaced midshaft treated nonoperatively
Beach chairPreferred position for superior plating
SuperiorTension-side surface - commonest plating position
Critical Must-Knows
  • No true internervous plane - the clavicle is subcutaneous; dissect directly onto bone through platysma
  • Supraclavicular nerves cross the field - identify and preserve them; warn the patient of numbness
  • Subclavian vessels and the pleural apex lie deep to the medial clavicle - never over-penetrate drills
  • Superior plate sits on the tension side but is prominent; anteroinferior is less prominent but needs more dissection
  • Deltotrapezial fascia is the key layer for lateral and distal third fractures

When & Why

What it exposes. The approach to the clavicle is a direct subcutaneous exposure of the shaft (and, by extension, its medial and lateral ends) that exploits the fact the bone lies almost entirely beneath the skin, suspended between the sternoclavicular and acromioclavicular joints. The surgeon chooses between a superior and an anteroinferior incision depending on the desired plate position.

What this approach exposes
  • Direct access to the subcutaneous clavicular shaft, from the sternoclavicular to the acromioclavicular joint - There is no true internervous plane - dissection is directly onto bone through platysma - The supraclavicular nerves must be identified and protected in every case - The subclavian vessels, brachial plexus and pleural apex lie deep to the medial clavicle and are at risk from over-penetrating drills - The plate can be placed on the superior (tension-side) or anteroinferior surface
Why it matters
  • Displaced midshaft clavicle fractures have a materially higher nonunion and symptomatic malunion rate when treated nonoperatively than was once taught - Operative fixation restores length, alignment and rotation and lowers the risk of nonunion - Plate-position choice directly trades off biomechanical strength against hardware prominence - The superficial location makes iatrogenic nerve injury and hardware irritation the dominant complications

Indications - Displaced midshaft clavicle fractures with shortening greater than 2 cm, complete (100 percent) displacement, comminution, or bayonet apposition

  • Distal third clavicle fractures (Neer Type II) with displacement driven by the weight of the arm and coracoclavicular ligament disruption
  • Open clavicle fractures (surgical emergency)
  • Clavicle fractures with neurovascular injury (subclavian vessel or brachial plexus compromise)
  • Floating shoulder (clavicle plus glenoid neck fracture) and polytrauma where a stable shoulder girdle aids mobilisation and pulmonary toilet
  • Symptomatic nonunion or malunion requiring reconstruction or length-restoring osteotomy
  • Distal clavicle excision (Mumford procedure) for symptomatic acromioclavicular arthrosis
  • Infection or tumour of the clavicle requiring debridement or excision Contraindications - Minimally displaced or non-displaced fractures best managed nonoperatively
  • Medical unfitness for anaesthesia
  • Active soft-tissue infection or severe abrasive contusion over the surgical site (delay until skin recovers)
  • Low functional demand with an acceptable nonoperative outcome Alternative / adjunct approaches - Anteromedial (Edinburgh) approach to the sternoclavicular joint for medial third pathology
  • Minimally invasive / subcutaneous plating for selected simple shaft patterns
  • Intramedullary fixation via a small lateral stab incision for selected midshaft patterns (preserves periosteum, weaker rotational control) Position & landmarks. Beach chair (semi-sitting) is preferred for almost all clavicle plating: the patient is sat up so the clavicle is horizontal and the shoulder girdle relaxed, with a small bolster or sandbag between the scapulae to throw the clavicle forward, the arm free-draped so the shoulder can be manipulated to aid reduction, and the head turned slightly away from the operative side and secured. C-arm or portable imaging is available for AP and cephalad-tilt views, and all bony pressure points are padded. For anteroinferior plating, beach chair or supine with a scapular bolster lets the arm fall back to expose the anteroinferior surface.
Positioning nuance

The beach chair position is preferred for almost all clavicle plating because it places the superior surface of the bone uppermost and horizontal, it lets the arm hang to relax the deltoid and aid reduction, and it gives the anaesthetist and surgeon comfortable access. The lateral decubitus position is a useful alternative for anteroinferior plating. Remember the beach chair carries a risk of cerebral hypoperfusion in the head-up posture - coordinate with anaesthesia on blood-pressure management and cerebral monitoring.

Key bony landmarks: the sternal notch (medial end at the sternoclavicular joint), the entire clavicular shaft (palpable subcutaneously from sternum to acromion), the acromioclavicular joint (lateral prominence), and the coracoid process (just inferior and medial to the distal clavicle - a key reference for distal third work). Soft-tissue landmarks: the platysma in the superficial fascia, the supraclavicular nerves (the middle branch crosses the mid-clavicle), and the external jugular vein crossing the medial clavicle. Superior versus anteroinferior incision

Superior versus Anteroinferior Incision
FeatureSuperior IncisionAnteroinferior Incision
Incision lineDirectly over the superior border, in line with the boneCurved along the anteroinferior border, 1 to 2 cm below the clavicle
Plate positionOn the superior (tension-side) surfaceOn the anteroinferior (compression-side) surface
BiomechanicsTension-band effect; strongest in cantilever bending in most studiesSound fixation; some studies show equivalence to superior plating
Hardware prominenceMore prominent - symptomatic irritation in a meaningful minorityLess prominent - plate covered by soft tissue, favoured in thin or athletic patients
DissectionMinimal - direct onto boneGreater - elevation of deltoid and pectoralis fibres
Nerve / vascular riskSupraclavicular nerves cross the fieldSupraclavicular nerves plus closer proximity to the subclavian bundle
ScarMore visible, on top of the boneLess conspicuous, hidden below the clavicle
Best useMost midshaft fracturesProminence-sensitive patients, athletes, revision and cosmetic preference

Incision planning. For a superior incision, a straight longitudinal incision is centred over the fracture, in line with the long axis of the bone, long enough to place a plate of adequate working length. For an anteroinferior incision, a gently curved incision runs 1 to 2 cm below and parallel to the inferior border of the clavicle, deepened up onto the anteroinferior surface of the bone. For distal third fractures, the incision is angled toward the acromioclavicular joint to access the deltotrapezial interval.

The Exposure

Work down through the layers directly onto this subcutaneous bone - splitting platysma in line, protecting the supraclavicular nerves at every step, and staying strictly on bone to keep the deep neurovascular structures safe.

📷
Image Needed: Clinical PhotoHigh Priority

Intra-operative photograph of the superior approach to the clavicle: a longitudinal incision over the superior border of the shaft, platysma split in line with the incision, a supraclavicular nerve branch protected with a vessel loop, and a precontoured superior plate applied to the subcutaneous midshaft clavicle.

Context: A verified image is being sourced.

Pending image generation or sourcing

Exposure sequence

Step 1Position and mark
  • Confirm beach chair position with the head turned away from the operative side and a bolster between the scapulae.
  • Palpate the entire clavicle from the sternal notch to the acromioclavicular joint and mark the fracture site fluoroscopically.
  • Plan a longitudinal incision centred over the fracture and long enough to seat the chosen plate (superior), or a curved anteroinferior incision 1 to 2 cm below the bone.
Step 2Skin incision down to platysma
  • Incise skin and subcutaneous tissue in one pass down to platysma.
  • Achieve careful haemostasis with bipolar diathermy - the small vessels here are numerous.
Step 3Split platysma in line
  • Split platysma in the line of the skin incision (not transected across) to expose the underlying investing cervical fascia.
  • Splitting in line preserves platysma for a robust closure that later covers the plate.
Step 4Identify and protect the supraclavicular nerves (CRITICAL)
  • The supraclavicular nerves (C3 to C4, from the cervical plexus) cross the field; the middle branch commonly crosses the mid-clavicle.
  • Identify them, mobilise them gently, and protect them with vessel loops.
  • If a small branch must be divided for access, do so sharply and document it - counsel the patient pre-operatively that numbness over the clavicle or upper chest is common and may be permanent.
Step 5Incise the investing fascia
  • Incise the deep fascia in line with the incision to expose the periosteum of the clavicle and, laterally, the deltotrapezial interval.
  • There is no true internervous plane - retract trapezius (spinal accessory nerve) superiorly and pectoralis major (medial and lateral pectoral nerves) inferiorly off the shaft.
Step 6Expose the fracture subperiosteally
  • Elevate the periosteum off the superior surface (superior plating) or the anteroinferior surface (anteroinferior plating) just enough to deliver the fracture ends.
  • For the lateral third, split the deltotrapezial fascia between deltoid (anterior/inferior) and trapezius (posterior/superior) to expose the distal clavicle and coracoid region.
  • Preserve periosteum and soft-tissue attachments to comminuted fragments where possible.
Step 7Reduce the fracture
  • Clear callus and organised haematoma from the fracture ends.
  • Restore length, alignment and rotation using reduction clamps, a bone-holding clamp, and if needed a small joystick K-wire in each fragment.
  • For comminuted or shortened fractures, use the plate as a reduction aid (bridge plating) after provisional length restoration.
Step 8Plate the clavicle and image
  • Superior plating (most common): a precontoured superior clavicle plate or a 3.5 mm limited-contact dynamic compression plate contoured to the S-shape - it sits on the tension side and acts as a tension band.
  • Anteroinferior plating: a precontoured anteroinferior plate when prominence must be minimised; screws are directed from anteroinferior to posterosuperior.
  • Bridge plating for comminuted patterns (long plate, locked screws, preserve fragment blood supply).
  • For distal third (Neer) fractures: a distal clavicle plate, a hook plate (where coracoclavicular ligaments are disrupted and distal fixation is poor), or coracoclavicular stabilisation with a cortical-button or tightrope construct.
  • Confirm reduction and screw length on AP and 30-degree cephalad tilt views; aim for at least three bicortical screws each side of the fracture for simple patterns.
Step 9Stay on bone - protect the deep structures
  • The subclavian vessels, brachial plexus and pleural apex lie immediately deep to the medial clavicle, separated only by subclavius.
  • Stay strictly on bone; use an oscillating drill or stop-loaded drilling, and check screw lengths carefully.
  • Never pass an instrument blindly around the medial clavicle.
Protect the supraclavicular nerves at every step

The supraclavicular nerves are the structure most often injured in this approach - they cross the field in the superficial layer, with the middle branch over the midshaft. Division produces numbness over the clavicle and upper chest and occasionally a painful neuroma. Identify and loop every branch before dividing fascia, handle them gently, never catch them in a closure suture, and counsel the patient pre-operatively that some numbness is common and may be permanent.

No true internervous plane - and unforgiving deep structures

The clavicle is subcutaneous and the approach is direct onto bone through platysma - there is no classical internervous interval. Trapezius (accessory nerve) is retracted superiorly and pectoralis major (medial and lateral pectoral nerves) inferiorly. Stating there is no true internervous plane is one of the highest-yield Operative Surgery answers on the clavicle. The subclavian artery and vein, brachial plexus and apical pleura lie deep to the medial clavicle, separated only by subclavius - stay on bone, use oscillating or depth-stop drilling, and never pass instruments blindly medially.

Dangers & Extensions

Danger structures and how to protect them

Danger structures and how to protect them
LayerStructure at riskProtection
SuperficialSupraclavicular nerves (C3 to C4, sensory)Identify and mobilise before dividing fascia; vessel loops; warn patient of numbness
Superficial (medial extension)External jugular veinIdentify and retract; ligate if divided
DeepSubclavian artery and vein (deep to medial clavicle, separated by subclavius)Stay on bone; oscillating or depth-stop drilling; measure screws; never over-penetrate
DeepBrachial plexus (deep to lateral two-thirds)No instruments passed blindly around the bone; subperiosteal dissection only
DeepApical pleura / lung apex (most exposed medially)Same on-bone technique; watch for post-op pneumothorax; chest radiograph if concerned

Extensile options. Extend medially toward the sternoclavicular joint for medial third fractures, sternoclavicular dislocation and medial clavicle excision - the sternocleidomastoid (clavicular head) is encountered and retracted superiorly, with increasing risk to the subclavian vessels and pleural apex as dissection moves medially (stay strictly subperiosteal). Extend laterally toward the acromioclavicular joint by developing the deltotrapezial interval between deltoid (anterior/inferior) and trapezius (posterior/superior), exposing the distal clavicle, acromioclavicular joint and coracoid region for distal third (Neer) fractures, acromioclavicular reconstruction and the Mumford procedure. Minimally invasive options include subcutaneous bridge plating through two small stab incisions for selected simple midshaft patterns, and intramedullary fixation through a lateral stab - which preserves periosteum but gives weaker rotational and length control than a plate. Closure principles. The closure is as important as the approach because it determines hardware prominence and scar quality. Irrigate copiously and achieve meticulous haemostasis (a drain is rarely required unless dissection was extensive). Then reapproximate the periosteum and deltotrapezial fascia over the plate to cover the hardware and restore the soft-tissue envelope - for distal third fractures, repair the deltotrapezial interval meticulously. Close platysma as a distinct strong layer with absorbable suture (this is the layer that prevents plate prominence and supports a fine scar), then subcutaneous tissue, then skin with a subcuticular monofilament for a superior incision to optimise cosmesis. Ensure no protected supraclavicular nerve is caught in any suture. Intra-operative complications

Intra-operative complications
ComplicationPreventionManagement
Supraclavicular nerve injuryIdentify and protect before dividing fasciaSharp neurolysis or division; counsel patient; neuroma excision if painful
Subclavian vessel injuryStay on bone; oscillating or stop-drilling; no blind instrumentsImmediate vascular control; vascular surgery; repair
PneumothoraxSame on-bone technique; caution mediallyChest radiograph; chest drain if confirmed
Brachial plexus injuryNo blind retraction; subperiosteal onlyDocument; nerve-surgeon referral; targeted imaging

Post-operative complications

Post-operative complications
ComplicationIncidencePreventionTreatment
Hardware prominence / irritationMeaningful minority (up to around a tenth to a fifth)Anteroinferior plating in at-risk patients; cover plate with fascia and platysmaHardware removal after union if symptomatic
Hypertrophic or symptomatic scarVariableSubcuticular closure; platysma layerScar revision if requested
Implant failure / nonunionLowAdequate fixation; bridge comminution; preserve biologyRevision ORIF with bone graft
InfectionLow (subcutaneous bone)Aseptic technique; soft-tissue handlingAntibiotics; debridement; retain or remove hardware
Numbness over clavicle / upper chestCommonNerve-sparing techniqueReassure; usually well tolerated
Hardware prominence is the dominant patient-reported problem

Hardware prominence is the dominant patient-reported problem after superior clavicle plating because the plate sits directly under thin skin on a tension-side surface. Covering the plate with the deltotrapezial fascia and platysma, and choosing an anteroinferior plate in thin or athletic patients, reduces symptomatic prominence and the need for later hardware removal.

Management of suspected deep injury - Suspected vascular injury: immediate vascular surgery input, proximal control, repair or shunting as required.

  • Suspected pneumothorax: intra-operative chest radiograph, chest drain if confirmed.
  • New post-operative neurological deficit: document carefully, neurosurgical or nerve-surgeon referral, targeted imaging. Post-operative care. Document a neurovascular examination of the upper limb against the pre-operative baseline, support the arm in a sling for comfort, and consider a chest radiograph after medial dissection to exclude pneumothorax. Rehabilitation uses a sling for 1 to 2 weeks for comfort with pendulum and gentle active-assisted range of movement from the outset, avoiding heavy lifting and contact sport until radiographic union (typically 3 to 4 months). Follow-up: 2 weeks (wound check and subcuticular suture removal), 6 weeks (radiographs and progress range of movement), 3 months (radiographs, confirm bridging callus, wean restrictions), and 6 to 12 months (final radiographs and functional review).

Procedures Through This Approach

  • Clavicle ORIF - plate fixation of displaced midshaft and distal third clavicle fractures, the principal operation done through this exposure.
  • Distal clavicle excision (Mumford) - for symptomatic acromioclavicular arthrosis, via the lateral extension.
  • Open fracture debridement and fixation, and nonunion or malunion reconstruction with length-restoring osteotomy.
  • Sternoclavicular and medial clavicle pathology via the medial extension, and coracoclavicular stabilisation for distal third (Neer) fractures via the deltotrapezial interval.

Viva & Exam Focus

Mnemonic

CLAVICLECLAVICLE - the surgical steps

C
Confirm the indication
Shortening greater than 2 cm or fully displaced midshaft fracture
L
Landmarks
Sternal notch, palpable shaft, acromioclavicular joint
A
Approach incision
Along the superior border, in line with the bone
V
Visualise the nerves
Identify and protect the supraclavicular nerves
I
Incise platysma
Split in line with the skin incision, never transect across
C
Continue subperiosteally
Dissect directly onto the clavicle
L
Lock the reduction
Contoured plate with three bicortical screws each side
E
Evaluate screw lengths
Stay on bone; avoid deep over-penetration
Mnemonic

PROTECTPROTECT - danger-structure principles

P
Platysma in line
Split with the incision, never transect across
R
Reserve the nerves
Preserve the supraclavicular nerves
O
On bone
Subperiosteal dissection only
T
Tension side
A superior plate is biomechanically strongest
E
Evaluate drill depth
The subclavian bundle lies deep to the medial clavicle
C
Cover the plate
Reapproximate deltotrapezial fascia and platysma
T
Two extensions
Medial to the SC joint, lateral via the deltotrapezial interval
Mnemonic

PLATESPLATES - superior versus anteroinferior

P
Position
Superior is the tension side, anteroinferior the compression side
L
Less prominence
An anteroinferior plate is less prominent
A
Anteroinferior dissection
Needs greater elevation of deltoid and pectoralis
T
Tension-side superiority
The superior plate is strongest in cantilever bending
E
Exposure of distal third
Through the deltotrapezial interval
S
Scar visibility
The superior scar is more visible than the anteroinferior scar
Q: What is the internervous plane of the approach to the clavicle?

A: There is no true internervous plane. The clavicle is subcutaneous; the platysma is split in line with the incision and dissection proceeds directly onto bone, with trapezius (accessory nerve) retracted superiorly and pectoralis major (medial and lateral pectoral nerves) retracted inferiorly.

Q: Which nerve is most often injured during the clavicle approach?

A: The supraclavicular nerves (C3 to C4, from the cervical plexus). The middle supraclavicular nerve crosses the midshaft. Division causes numbness over the clavicle and upper chest and occasionally a painful neuroma. Identify and protect them in every case.

Q: Compare superior and anteroinferior plating of the clavicle

A: A superior plate sits on the tension side and is biomechanically strongest in cantilever bending but is more prominent under the skin. An anteroinferior plate is less prominent and better in thin or athletic patients but requires more dissection and lies closer to the subclavian neurovascular bundle. The superior surface is the most common plating position.

Q: What structures lie deep to the clavicle and how do you protect them?

A: The subclavian artery and vein, the brachial plexus and the apical pleura, separated from the bone by subclavius. Protect them by staying strictly on bone, using oscillating or depth-stop drilling, measuring screws, and never passing instruments blindly around the medial clavicle. Over-penetration can cause catastrophic haemorrhage or pneumothorax.

Clinical Decision Scenarios

Practise clinical reasoning and management decisions out loud

Viva scenarioStandard
Clinical prompt

A 25-year-old manual worker falls off a bicycle and sustains a completely displaced, shortened midshaft clavicle fracture. How would you manage this and what approach would you use?

Practical approach
I would assess the patient according to ATLS principles, taking a focused history of mechanism, hand dominance, occupation and sport, and examining for skin integrity, neurovascular status of the upper limb and associated injuries. I would obtain AP and 30-degree cephalad tilt radiographs and compare shortening with the contralateral side. A fracture that is completely displaced with shortening greater than two centimetres and comminution has a materially higher risk of nonunion and symptomatic malunion when treated nonoperatively, so I would recommend open reduction and internal fixation. I would position the patient in the beach chair position, approach the bone through a superior incision centred over the fracture, split platysma in line, identify and protect the supraclavicular nerves, and dissect directly onto bone in a subperiosteal fashion, remembering there is no true internervous plane. I would reduce the fracture, restore length and rotation, and apply a precontoured superior clavicle plate with at least three bicortical screws each side. I would stay on bone during drilling because the subclavian vessels, brachial plexus and pleural apex lie deep to the medial clavicle. I would close the deltotrapezial fascia and platysma over the plate to minimise prominence, then subcuticular skin.
Key clinical points
Complete displacement with shortening greater than 2 cm justifies ORIF
Beach chair position with the superior surface uppermost
No true internervous plane - direct subcutaneous approach through platysma
Identify and protect the supraclavicular nerves
Superior plate on the tension side with three bicortical screws each side
Stay on bone to protect the subclavian vessels, brachial plexus and pleura
Close fascia and platysma over the plate to reduce prominence
Common pitfalls
Failing to measure shortening against the contralateral clavicle
Saying there is an internervous plane
Not mentioning protection of the supraclavicular nerves
Forgetting that the subclavian vessels and pleura lie deep to the medial clavicle
Further questions
How would you counsel the patient about post-operative numbness, and what would you do for a symptomatic nonunion at six months?
Viva scenarioChallenging
Clinical prompt

A 40-year-old presents with a displaced distal third clavicle fracture (Neer Type II) with the proximal fragment displaced superiorly. How does your approach differ from a midshaft fracture?

Practical approach
A Neer Type II distal third fracture is unstable because the coracoclavicular ligaments are disrupted and the weight of the arm pulls the distal fragment downward while the trapezius pulls the proximal fragment superiorly, giving a high nonunion rate with nonoperative care. I would plan an operative approach. I would use the beach chair position but angle the incision toward the acromioclavicular joint to access the distal clavicle. The key step is to develop the deltotrapezial interval between deltoid anteriorly and inferiorly and trapezius posteriorly and superiorly, exposing the distal clavicle, the acromioclavicular joint and the coracoid region. I would protect the supraclavicular nerves as before and remain mindful that the same deep structures are at risk medially. For fixation I would choose a precontoured distal clavicle plate with multiple points of distal fixation, or a hook plate where distal fixation is poor and the coracoclavicular ligaments are disrupted, with coracoclavicular stabilisation using a cortical-button or tightrope construct if needed. At closure I would repair the deltotrapezial interval meticulously to cover the distal plate and restore soft-tissue stability, then close platysma and skin.
Key clinical points
Neer Type II is unstable - coracoclavicular ligaments disrupted, high nonunion risk
Angle the incision toward the acromioclavicular joint
Develop the deltotrapezial interval between deltoid and trapezius
Expose the distal clavicle, acromioclavicular joint and coracoid
Use a distal clavicle plate, hook plate, or coracoclavicular stabilisation
Repair the deltotrapezial interval at closure
Common pitfalls
Treating a Neer Type II fracture nonoperatively (high nonunion rate)
Using a standard midshaft incision that does not reach the distal fragment
Not repairing the deltotrapezial interval at closure
Forgetting the option of coracoclavicular stabilisation
Further questions
When would you use a hook plate, and what are its drawbacks?
Viva scenarioStandard
Clinical prompt

A thin, athletic 30-year-old requests fixation of a displaced midshaft clavicle fracture but is concerned about a prominent plate. How do you decide between superior and anteroinferior plating?

Practical approach
I would discuss the trade-off between the two plate positions. A superior plate sits on the tension side of the clavicle and is biomechanically strongest in cantilever bending in most studies; it is the most common position and gives the most straightforward exposure and reduction. Its drawback is prominence, because it lies directly under thin skin, with symptomatic irritation in a meaningful minority of patients and a frequent need for later removal. An anteroinferior plate sits on the compression-side surface beneath the clavicle and is covered by soft tissue, so it is less prominent and is favoured in thin or athletic patients and in revision or cosmetic-sensitive cases; its drawbacks are greater dissection, more demanding contouring, and closer proximity to the subclavian neurovascular bundle, which demands meticulous on-bone drilling. For this thin, athletic patient concerned about prominence, I would favour an anteroinferior plate, having counselled them about the slightly greater dissection and the small additional neurovascular risk, and I would ensure the deltotrapezial fascia and platysma cover whichever plate is chosen. In both approaches I would protect the supraclavicular nerves and counsel the patient about numbness.
Key clinical points
Superior plate: tension side, strongest, most common, but most prominent
Anteroinferior plate: less prominent, favoured in thin or athletic patients and revision
Anteroinferior needs greater dissection and closer attention to the subclavian bundle
Cover either plate with deltotrapezial fascia and platysma
Protect the supraclavicular nerves in both approaches
Common pitfalls
Promising that either plate will never be prominent
Not counselling about the small additional neurovascular risk of anteroinferior plating
Forgetting that the superior surface is the tension side
Omitting nerve protection and the numbness consent
Further questions
Which surface is the tension side of the clavicle and why, and what is the role of intramedullary fixation?
Exam day cheat sheet
APPROACH TO THE CLAVICLE

Patient Position

  • Beach chair (semi-sitting) is preferred - superior surface uppermost and horizontal
  • Bolster between the scapulae throws the clavicle forward
  • Head turned away from the operative side and secured
  • Coordinate with anaesthesia on head-up blood-pressure management
  • Imaging available for AP and cephalad-tilt views

Internervous Plane

  • NO true internervous plane - the clavicle is subcutaneous
  • Platysma split in line with the skin incision
  • Direct subperiosteal dissection onto bone
  • Trapezius (accessory nerve) retracted superiorly
  • Pectoralis major (medial and lateral pectoral nerves) retracted inferiorly

Supraclavicular Nerves

  • Sensory branches of the cervical plexus (C3 to C4)
  • Middle branch crosses the midshaft
  • Identify and protect before dividing fascia
  • Warn patient of numbness over clavicle and upper chest
  • Avoid catching them in closure sutures

Plate Position Trade-off

  • Superior plate on the tension side - strongest, most common, most prominent
  • Anteroinferior plate - less prominent, for thin or athletic patients and revision
  • Anteroinferior needs greater dissection and closer neurovascular attention
  • Bridge plate for comminuted patterns
  • Cover either plate with deltotrapezial fascia and platysma

Danger Structures

  • Supraclavicular nerves in the superficial layer
  • Subclavian artery and vein deep to the medial clavicle (separated by subclavius)
  • Brachial plexus deep to the lateral two-thirds
  • Apical pleura deep to the medial clavicle - pneumothorax risk
  • Stay on bone; oscillating or stop-drilling; never pass instruments blindly medially

Extensions and Closure

  • Medial extension toward the sternoclavicular joint for medial third fractures
  • Lateral extension through the deltotrapezial interval for distal third fractures
  • Reapproximate periosteum and deltotrapezial fascia over the plate
  • Close platysma as a distinct layer
  • Subcuticular skin closure for a fine scar

References

Guidelines, Registries & Global Practice Management of clavicle fractures is broadly convergent across examination systems. The modern consensus, built on randomised evidence, is that displaced midshaft clavicle fractures (complete displacement, shortening greater than 2 cm, comminution) carry a materially higher risk of nonunion and symptomatic malunion than was historically taught, which has shifted practice toward operative fixation for clearly indicated fractures. Side-by-side principles (where guidance converges): | Body | Position on clavicle fractures |

|------|-------------------------------| | AO Foundation | Anatomic restoration of length, alignment and rotation; superior or anteroinferior plating with adequate working length; bridge comminution while preserving fragment biology | | BOA / BOAST (open fractures) | Open clavicle fractures are a surgical emergency; urgent debridement and appropriate antibiotics; orthoplastic collaboration for significant soft-tissue injury | | AAOS / OTA | Operative fixation for clearly displaced midshaft fractures with shortening or comminution; recognise the elevated nonunion risk in this subgroup | Population evidence: - Clavicle fractures account for a sizeable proportion of all fractures, with a bimodal distribution: high-energy injury in young men and low-energy fragility falls in older adults.

  • Nonunion after nonoperative care is concentrated in fully displaced and comminuted midshaft fractures, where it is far higher than the very low rate seen in non-displaced injuries. Global practice variation: In high-resource settings, precontoured superior and anteroinferior locking plates and cortical-button coracoclavicular constructs are standard. In resource-limited settings, the same biomechanical principles are achieved with contoured small-fragment plates and, for many patterns, well-executed nonoperative care remains acceptable where the fracture is not clearly displaced. Consent (globally applicable): discuss numbness from supraclavicular nerve handling, hardware prominence and possible later removal, infection (subcutaneous bone), nonunion or implant failure, the small but serious risk of injury to the subclavian vessels or pleura, and the typical scar.
Evidence

Plate Fixation versus Nonoperative Care for Acute Displaced Midshaft Clavicular Fractures

LoE 1
Canadian Orthopaedic Trauma Society (Altamimi S, McKee MD)New England Journal of Medicine (2007)
Key Findings:
  • Multicentre randomised trial of plate fixation versus nonoperative care for completely displaced midshaft clavicular fractures
  • Operative fixation gave better early shoulder and arm function than nonoperative care
  • Operative fixation markedly reduced nonunion and symptomatic malunion compared with nonoperative care
  • Established operative fixation as the reference standard for clearly displaced midshaft fractures
Clinical implication: The landmark randomised study underpinning the modern shift toward plate fixation of completely displaced midshaft clavicle fractures
Evidence

Estimating the Risk of Nonunion Following Nonoperative Treatment of a Clavicular Fracture

LoE 2
Robinson CM, Court-Brown CM, McQueen MM, Wakefield AEJournal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American) (2004)
Key Findings:
  • Large prospective cohort of clavicle fractures treated nonoperatively
  • Overall nonunion rate was low, but it was concentrated in completely displaced and comminuted midshaft fractures
  • Displacement, comminution and increasing shortening were associated with a markedly higher risk of nonunion
  • Challenged the traditional teaching that all midshaft clavicle fractures heal reliably
Clinical implication: Defined the high-risk subgroup of displaced midshaft fractures that justifies operative fixation
Evidence

Deficits Following Nonoperative Treatment of Displaced Midshaft Clavicular Fractures

LoE 2
McKee MD, Pedersen EM, Jones C, Stephen DJG, Kreder HJ, Schemitsch EH, Wild LM, Potter JJournal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American) (2012)
Key Findings:
  • Compared nonoperative care (with malunion) to plate fixation in displaced midshaft clavicular fractures
  • Malunion after nonoperative care was associated with measurable strength and endurance deficits of the shoulder
  • Patient-reported function and satisfaction favoured operative fixation
  • Provided functional, not just radiographic, justification for fixing these fractures
Clinical implication: Demonstrated measurable upper-limb deficits after nonoperative malunion, supporting fixation for active patients
Evidence

Surgical versus Conservative Interventions for Treating Fractures of the Middle Third of the Clavicle

LoE 1
Lenza M, Buchbinder R, Johnston RV, Bellotti JC, Faloppa FCochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (2019)
Key Findings:
  • Systematic review and meta-analysis of surgery (predominantly plating) versus conservative care for midshaft clavicular fractures
  • Surgery reduced the risk of nonunion and symptomatic malunion compared with conservative care
  • Surgical benefits were balanced by the typical risks of surgery, including hardware prominence and infection
  • Evidence quality was moderate; conclusions supported operative fixation for clearly displaced fractures
Clinical implication: Independent systematic-review confirmation that plating lowers nonunion and symptomatic malunion, with surgical trade-offs
Evidence

Anteroinferior Plating of the Clavicle

LoE 4
Collinge C, Devinney S, Herscovici D, DiPasquale T, Sanders RTechniques in Hand and Upper Extremity Surgery (2006)
Key Findings:
  • Described the anteroinferior (anterior) plating technique for clavicular shaft fractures
  • Placing the plate on the anteroinferior surface avoids symptomatic hardware prominence seen with superior plating
  • Reliable fixation was achieved with careful subperiosteal dissection and contouring
  • Particularly useful in thin patients, athletes and revision surgery where prominence is a concern
Clinical implication: Established anteroinferior plating as a sound option for reducing hardware prominence while maintaining fixation
Editorially reviewed — transparent references and correction processPublished by OrthoVellum Medical Education TeamEditorial boardMethodologyReview policy
Educational disclosure

Educational content is reviewed for source visibility, editorial coherence, and correction readiness.

No individual clinician credential is claimed unless a named person is shown.

Verify before clinical use; this is not medical advice or a substitute for local guidance.