Adult Reconstruction

Conversion THA (Failed Hip Fracture Fixation)

Comprehensive surgical technique guide for conversion total hip arthroplasty following failed hip fracture fixation - evidence-based approach with detailed operative steps and complication management

Core Procedure
intermediate
By OrthoVellum Medical Education Team

Reviewed by OrthoVellum Editorial Team

Editorial maintenance, source checking, and correction workflow • Published by OrthoVellum Medical Education Team

High-yield overview

Salvage arthroplasty | intermediate complexity

Critical Danger Structures

Sciatic Nerve (Posterior Approach)

Location: 10-20mm posterior to posterior hip capsule, exits pelvis beneath piriformis

Protection: Early identification before capsular dissection, maintain gentle retraction, avoid excessive internal rotation during femoral preparation

Femoral Neurovascular Bundle (Anterior Approach)

Location: 15-25mm medial to anterior hip capsule, travels beneath iliopsoas

Protection: Medial Hohmann retractor placement under direct vision, avoid aggressive medial retraction during acetabular preparation

Superior Gluteal Nerve (Posterior Approach)

Location: Exits sciatic notch 5cm superior to piriformis insertion, courses between gluteus medius and minimus

Protection: Limit proximal dissection to less than 5cm above greater trochanter, avoid detaching anterior third of gluteus medius

Lateral Femoral Cutaneous Nerve (Anterior Approach)

Location: 1-3cm medial to ASIS, superficial to sartorius origin

Protection: Incision planned 2-3cm lateral to ASIS, identify and preserve during fascia lata incision

Perforating Vessels (Femoral Preparation)

Location: First perforator 5-7cm distal to lesser trochanter, subsequent perforators every 3-4cm

Protection: Controlled reaming speeds, cautery/bone wax for bleeding, avoid aggressive fenestration near perforators

Mnemonic

HARDWAREHardware Assessment Required: Document Wound, Assess Re-operation Exposure

Mnemonic

STEM-FITStem Fixation In Trauma - component selection strategy

Primary Indications

Nonunion/Malunion

  • Femoral neck nonunion following cannulated screw fixation (greater than 6 months post-injury)
  • Intertrochanteric nonunion after DHS/cephalomedullary nail with persistent pain and functional limitation
  • Malunion with varus deformity causing mechanical symptoms and secondary acetabular wear

Avascular Necrosis

  • Segmental collapse of femoral head following fracture fixation (Ficat Stage 3-4)
  • Subchondral insufficiency fracture with progressive pain despite conservative management
  • Combined femoral head AVN and acetabular cartilage loss requiring dual-component arthroplasty

Hardware Failure

  • Implant cut-out with femoral head penetration requiring salvage arthroplasty
  • Plate/screw breakage with loss of fixation and progressive deformity
  • Subsidence of cephalomedullary nail with persistent proximal thigh pain

Post-Traumatic Arthritis

  • Progressive joint space narrowing following periarticular hip fracture
  • Intra-articular malunion causing impingement and accelerated cartilage wear
  • Combined bone loss (acetabular and femoral) requiring reconstruction

Contraindications

Absolute

  • Active sepsis (elevated inflammatory markers, positive cultures)
  • Medical instability precluding elective arthroplasty
  • Irreversible sciatic nerve palsy with non-functional limb

Relative

  • Recent infection (less than 6 weeks post-treatment)
  • Severe osteoporosis (T-score less than -4.0) with poor bone quality
  • Significant abductor deficiency without reconstructable soft tissues
  • Patient factors: poor compliance, active substance abuse, untreated psychiatric illness

Pre-operative Planning

Imaging Assessment

  • AP pelvis and cross-table lateral: Assess bone stock, hardware position, leg length discrepancy
  • Judet views: Acetabular columns, wall defects if acetabular component needed
  • Full-length femur AP/lateral: Entire nail if present, distal locking screws, femoral bow
  • CT scan: Complex bone loss, 3D reconstruction for templating, hardware assessment

Templating Strategy

  • Magnification correction: Calibrate with known implant size or marker
  • Account for bone loss: Medial calcar defects, greater trochanter position, acetabular floor
  • Component selection: Long-stem revision components, dual mobility cup, constraint options
  • Offset/length restoration: Compare to contralateral hip, document planned leg length change

Hardware Inventory

  • Extraction instruments: Screw extractors, conical extractors, plate removal set
  • Nail removal tools: Universal extraction device, slap hammer, femoral hooks
  • Fenestration equipment: High-speed burr, trephines (8-12mm), cerclage cables
  • Revision implants: Modular stems, extended offset options, dual mobility bearings

Complications and Management

Major Complications: Recognition, Prevention, and Management

Clinical Decision Scenarios

Use these scenarios to practise clinical reasoning and management decisions

CLINICAL SCENARIOStandard

CLINICAL PROMPT

"A 72-year-old woman presents 18 months after cannulated screw fixation of a displaced femoral neck fracture. She has persistent groin pain, limited function, and radiographs show segmental collapse of the femoral head with screws in situ. How would you manage this patient?"

PRACTICAL APPROACH
This patient has failed internal fixation with AVN and segmental collapse requiring salvage arthroplasty. I would approach this systematically through assessment, planning, and surgical strategy. **Assessment**: Complete history including infection risk factors, medical optimization status, functional demands. Examination for leg length discrepancy, abductor strength, neurovascular status. Investigations: AP pelvis and lateral hip radiographs to assess bone stock, screw position, acetabular cartilage. Inflammatory markers (ESR, CRP) to exclude infection. Consider CT if complex bone loss or retained hardware concerns. **Pre-operative Planning**: Templating on calibrated radiographs accounting for calcar bone loss. Plan conversion to total hip arthroplasty with hardware removal. Component selection: likely require revision-type femoral component (calcar-replacing stem) given segmental collapse and medial calcar deficiency from screws. Dual mobility cup to reduce dislocation risk. Prepare hardware extraction instruments. **Surgical Approach**: Posterior approach provides excellent exposure for hardware removal and component insertion. Systematic hardware removal: remove screws sequentially, preserve bone stock during extraction. Assess femoral bone defects (Paprosky classification) - likely Type II with metaphyseal loss. Acetabular preparation: likely needs total hip replacement (THR) given cartilage damage from abnormal loading. Insert dual mobility cup (40° abduction, 15° anteversion). Femoral preparation: graft screw holes, use calcar-replacing long stem (150-200mm) bypassing defects. Restore offset and leg length per templating. **Post-operative**: Extended DVT prophylaxis 35 days, posterior hip precautions 6 weeks, weight-bearing as tolerated if good bone quality. Monitor for complications: dislocation (reduced with dual mobility), infection (higher risk in conversion), nerve injury.
CLINICAL SCENARIOStandard

CLINICAL PROMPT

"You are planning a conversion THA for a 68-year-old man with failed DHS fixation of an intertrochanteric fracture. Radiographs show the lag screw has cut out superiorly with varus collapse. Walk me through your pre-operative planning and surgical strategy."

PRACTICAL APPROACH
This represents a challenging conversion with likely significant bone loss from the fracture, malunion, and hardware failure. My approach would focus on comprehensive planning for hardware removal and reconstruction. **Pre-operative Assessment**: Full-length AP and lateral femur radiographs to assess entire DHS plate, distal screws, degree of varus collapse, greater trochanter position. Judet views to assess acetabulum - often develops superior wear from altered mechanics. CT scan with 3D reconstruction to define bone loss, particularly medial calcar and greater trochanter. Measure leg length discrepancy (likely shortened on affected side). Template for component sizes accounting for defects. **Hardware Considerations**: DHS removal requires specific strategy: (1) Remove lag screw first - may be intrapelvic if cut-out, fluoroscopy to localize, (2) Remove side plate screws from distal to proximal, (3) Extract plate - may be adherent to lateral femur, need elevator. Prepare lag screw extraction set, conical extractors for stripped screws, high-speed burr if screw needs windowing. **Bone Stock Assessment**: Varus malunion creates specific defects: (1) Medial calcar deficiency - requires calcar-replacing stem, (2) Greater trochanter displacement - may need advancement and cable fixation, (3) Lag screw hole in femoral head/neck - bone loss in typical reaming path, (4) Lateral plate screw holes - stress risers requiring bypass. Likely Paprosky Type II or III femoral deficiency. **Component Selection**: Acetabulum: likely needs resurfacing given superior wear, standard uncemented cup if good bone. Consider dual mobility for instability risk. Femur: revision-type stem essential - calcar-replacing design (Wagner SL Revision, Corail Revision), length 150-200mm to bypass plate screw holes, modular junction allows offset/version adjustment. If very poor bone, cemented stem option. Prepare for cerclage cables if intraoperative fracture. **Surgical Technique**: Posterior or lateral approach. Extended exposure likely needed. Remove hardware systematically. If lag screw intrapelvic, remove after acetabular exposure - may aid in acetabular visualization. Femoral preparation: graft screw holes with morselized bone, ream carefully to avoid perforation through varus malunion. Extended trochanteric osteotomy if cannot deliver femur for reaming. Restore anatomy: correct varus, restore offset (increased head-neck offset to restore abductor moment arm), equalize leg length.
CLINICAL SCENARIOStandard

CLINICAL PROMPT

"During a conversion THA for failed femoral neck fracture fixation, you encounter a cephalomedullary nail that will not extract via the proximal entry point. How do you proceed?"

PRACTICAL APPROACH
An incarcerated cephalomedullary nail requires a systematic approach to safe removal without causing iatrogenic femoral fracture or excessive bone loss. **Immediate Assessment**: Stop extraction attempts to avoid proximal femur fracture. Obtain intraoperative AP and lateral fluoroscopy to assess: (1) Nail position - confirm fully within canal, not perforated, (2) Distal locking screws - ensure all removed (common cause of incarceration), (3) Proximal locking screws - verify removed or can be disengaged, (4) Bone quality - assess cortical thickness for fenestration planning. **Problem Solving Algorithm**: First, ensure all locking screws removed - often distal screws missed. Second, verify extraction device engaged properly - should thread 3-4 turns into proximal nail. Third, attempt gentle slap-hammer technique with hip flexed to relax soft tissues. If still incarcerated, nail likely bone-ingrown or jammed from malunion - plan controlled femoral fenestration. **Femoral Fenestration Technique**: Create lateral cortical window to push nail proximally. Location: 5-7cm distal to nail tip (avoid perforating vessels at posterior femur), mark with fluoroscopy. Window size: 3x nail diameter (typically 30-35mm long, 10-12mm wide). Use trephines to preserve cortical bone as structural graft. Create longitudinal cut with oscillating saw, complete with osteotomes. Protect soft tissues with retractors. Insert femoral hook or curved osteotome through window to push nail proximally while assistant extracts from proximal entry. **Salvage of Cortical Window**: Save cortical bone segment - useful as structural graft for acetabular or calcar defects. Can morselized if not needed structurally. Measure window size for stem planning - requires bypassing by 2 cortical diameters. **Altered Surgical Plan**: Window creates stress riser requiring longer stem. Calculate required length: window location plus 2 cortical diameters (typically 14-16cm). Example: if window at 12cm from greater trochanter, need stem at least 26-28cm total length. Consider cable prophylaxis around window site. May need extended proximal coating or cemented stem if cortices thin. If window large (greater than 5cm) or comminuted, consider extended trochanteric osteotomy instead - provides better exposure and more reliable healing. **Intraoperative Decision Points**: If nail still difficult after window, extend window proximally (becomes extended trochanteric osteotomy) rather than create multiple windows. If cortical bone very thin (less than 3mm), prophylactic cables before broaching. If unexpected perforation during fenestration, convert to longer stem and cable fixation. **Post-operative Modifications**: Protected weight-bearing (toe-touch 6 weeks) if cortices thin or window large. Consider brace if mechanical stability concerns. Close monitoring of window site for fracture on 6-week and 12-week radiographs.

Conversion THA (Failed Hip Fracture Fixation) - Exam Summary

Clinical summary

References

  1. McKinley JC, Robinson CM. Treatment of displaced intracapsular hip fractures with total hip arthroplasty: comparison of primary arthroplasty with early salvage arthroplasty after failed internal fixation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002;84(11):2010-2015. doi:10.2106/00004623-200211000-00016

  2. Angelini M, McKee MD, Waddell JP, Haidukewych G, Schemitsch EH. Salvage of failed hip fracture fixation. J Orthop Trauma. 2009;23(6):471-478. doi:10.1097/BOT.0b013e3181acfc8c

  3. Laffosse JM, Molinier F, Tricoire JL, Bonnevialle N, Chiron P, Puget J. Cementless modular hip arthroplasty as a salvage operation for failed internal fixation of trochanteric fractures in elderly patients. Acta Orthop Belg. 2007;73(6):729-736. PMID:18260485

  4. Haidukewych GJ, Berry DJ. Salvage of failed internal fixation of intertrochanteric hip fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003;(412):184-188. doi:10.1097/01.blo.0000071753.41516.27

  5. Tate JP, Reinhart NM, Bridges CA, Brown NM, Sherman WF. Comparative outcomes of early versus late conversion to total hip arthroplasty following hip fracture fixation. J Arthroplasty. 2025;40(8):2048-2052.e4. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2025.01.015

  6. Adam P, Philippe R, Ehlinger M, et al. Dual mobility cups hip arthroplasty as a treatment for displaced fracture of the femoral neck in the elderly. A prospective, systematic, multicenter study with specific focus on postoperative dislocation. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2012;98(3):296-300. doi:10.1016/j.otsr.2012.01.005

  7. Zeng X, Zhan K, Zhang L, et al. Conversion to total hip arthroplasty after failed proximal femoral nail antirotations or dynamic hip screw fixations for stable intertrochanteric femur fractures: a retrospective study with a minimum follow-up of 3 years. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017;18(1):38. doi:10.1186/s12891-017-1415-6

  8. Enocson A, Tidermark J, Tornkvist H, Lapidus LJ. Dislocation of hemiarthroplasty after femoral neck fracture: better outcome after the anterolateral approach in a prospective cohort study on 739 consecutive hips. Acta Orthop. 2008;79(2):211-217. doi:10.1080/17453670710014996

  9. National Joint Registry (NJR) for England, Wales, Northern Ireland and the Isle of Man; Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry (AOANJRR); American Joint Replacement Registry (AJRR); Swedish Arthroplasty Register (SHAR). Annual Reports - hip arthroplasty by indication (fracture and conversion subgroups).