Distal Radius ORIF with Volar Locking Plate

TraumaAdvancedCore Procedure

Distal Radius ORIF with Volar Locking Plate

Comprehensive operative technique guide for open reduction and internal fixation of distal radius fractures using a volar locking plate — indications, modified Henry approach, step-by-step reduction and fixation, DRUJ assessment, complications and rehabilitation

High-yield overview

Open reduction and volar locking plate fixation for unstable distal radius fractures | advanced

Surgical Imaging

Critical Danger Structures and Exam Traps
Watershed Line and Flexor Tendon Rupture

The trap: Placing the volar plate distal to the watershed line or leaving a prominent distal edge causes attritional wear of the flexor pollicis longus tendon against the plate edge, leading to delayed rupture weeks to months after surgery.

The fix: Position the plate proximal to or flush with the watershed line. If the fracture pattern forces distal placement, ensure the pronator quadratus is repaired as a robust interposition flap between plate and tendons. Use low-profile plates with rounded edges.

Dorsal Screw Penetration and Extensor Rupture

Location: The dorsal cortex of the distal radius is thin. Locking screws that are too long penetrate dorsally and abrade the extensor tendons (especially extensor pollicis longus) in the third compartment.

Risk: Extensor pollicis longus rupture occurs in up to 5 percent of cases with prominent dorsal screws. Prevention requires measuring screw length 2 mm short of the dorsal cortex on calibrated fluoroscopy and confirming with 10-degree lateral and oblique views.

Median Nerve and Palmar Cutaneous Branch

Location: The median nerve lies ulnar to the flexor carpi radialis; the palmar cutaneous branch arises 5 cm proximal to the wrist crease and travels between the flexor carpi radialis and the flexor digitorum superficialis.

Risk: Excessive ulnar retraction or blind dissection in the proximal interval injures the palmar cutaneous branch, causing painful neuroma. The median nerve itself is at risk if the interval is developed too ulnarly or if a carpal tunnel release is performed through the same incision without adequate visualisation.

Radial Artery and Superficial Radial Nerve

Location: The radial artery lies immediately radial to the flexor carpi radialis tendon in the distal forearm. The superficial branch of the radial nerve emerges from beneath the brachioradialis 8-10 cm proximal to the radial styloid.

Risk: Failure to identify and protect the radial artery during radial retraction leads to bleeding or thrombosis. The superficial radial nerve sensory branches are vulnerable to traction injury or laceration during proximal exposure or percutaneous pin placement.

Intra-articular Screw Placement

Location: Locking screws placed too distally or at incorrect angles can enter the radiocarpal joint or the distal radioulnar joint.

Risk: Intra-articular screw penetration causes rapid chondral wear and arthritis. Prevention demands direct visualisation of the articular surface through a small capsular window or use of arthroscopy, plus multiple fluoroscopic projections including the 10-degree lateral view to profile the joint surface.

DRUJ Instability Missed Intraoperatively

Location: The triangular fibrocartilage complex and ulnar styloid are the primary stabilisers of the distal radioulnar joint. Fracture patterns involving the sigmoid notch or ulnar styloid base frequently destabilise the joint.

Risk: Failure to assess DRUJ stability after radius fixation leads to chronic instability, pain and reduced forearm rotation. Every case requires a shuck test under anaesthesia with direct comparison to the contralateral side before wound closure.

Mnemonic

V.O.L.A.RVOLAR — Modified Henry Approach Landmarks

Mnemonic

P.L.A.T.EPLATE — Fixation Principles

Mnemonic

R.A.D.I.U.SRADIUS — Reduction Sequence

Surgical Indications

Acceptable Parameters for Non-Operative Treatment

In a healthy, active adult the following radiographic parameters after closed reduction allow cast treatment with acceptable risk of malunion and post-traumatic arthritis:

  • Radial inclination greater than 15 degrees
  • Volar tilt between 0 and 15 degrees
  • Radial height within 2 mm of the contralateral wrist
  • Intra-articular step or gap less than 2 mm
  • No DRUJ instability on clinical examination

Any deviation beyond these thresholds, especially in young or high-demand patients, favours operative fixation to restore anatomy and minimise long-term complications.

Absolute Indications for Surgery

  • Intra-articular displacement with step or gap greater than 2 mm
  • Radial shortening greater than 5 mm or dorsal tilt greater than 20 degrees after attempted closed reduction
  • Open fractures or fractures with associated carpal tunnel syndrome requiring decompression
  • Associated DRUJ instability that cannot be reduced and held in a cast
  • Polytrauma or bilateral injuries where early mobilisation is essential

Relative Indications

  • Dorsal comminution with high risk of late collapse in cast
  • Volar shear (Smith) or Barton fracture patterns that are inherently unstable
  • Associated ulnar styloid fracture at the base with DRUJ instability
  • Patient factors: young age, high functional demand, inability to tolerate prolonged immobilisation

Contraindications

Absolute:

  • Active infection at the surgical site
  • Severe medical comorbidities precluding anaesthesia
  • Non-ambulatory patients with low functional demand where malunion is acceptable

Relative:

  • Osteoporosis severe enough to preclude stable fixation (consider augmentation or alternative fixation)
  • Delayed presentation with established malunion (consider corrective osteotomy instead)

Evidence for Operative versus Non-Operative Treatment

Radiographic Thresholds Predicting Loss of Reduction

Multiple prospective studies have defined the parameters beyond which cast treatment fails:

  • Radial shortening greater than 2 mm or dorsal tilt greater than 10 degrees after reduction predicts greater than 50 percent chance of significant displacement at union.
  • Intra-articular incongruity greater than 2 mm is associated with symptomatic arthritis in greater than 40 percent of patients at 5-7 years.

Functional Outcomes with Volar Locking Plates

Modern volar locking plates allow early mobilisation and achieve high rates of anatomic reduction even in osteoporotic bone. Comparative series demonstrate superior radiographic outcomes and faster return to function compared with external fixation or percutaneous pinning, particularly for intra-articular fractures.

Landmark Studies

Evidence

Unstable distal radial fractures treated with external fixation, a radial column plate, or a volar plate

Level I
Wei DH, Raizman NM, Bottino CJ, et alJ Bone Joint Surg Am
Clinical implication: Volar locking plates provide superior early radiographic and functional recovery; final outcomes converge by 1 year.
Source: J Bone Joint Surg Am 2009;91(7):1568-77
Evidence

Long-term outcomes of volar plate fixation for distal radius fractures

Level II
Rozental TD, Blazar PE, Franko OI, et alJ Hand Surg Am
Clinical implication: Anatomic reduction with volar locking plates yields durable function; radiographic arthritis does not always correlate with symptoms.
Evidence

Complications of volar locking plate fixation

Level III
Arora R, Lutz M, Hennerbichler A, et alJ Hand Surg Am
Clinical implication: Meticulous plate positioning proximal to the watershed line and accurate screw length measurement are mandatory to prevent tendon complications.
Evidence

DRUJ instability after distal radius fracture fixation

Level I
Lindau T, Adlercreutz C, Aspenberg PJ Hand Surg Br
Clinical implication: DRUJ stability must be assessed and addressed in every distal radius fracture case; ulnar styloid base fractures warrant fixation or TFCC repair when instability is demonstrated.

Clinical Decision Scenarios

Practise clinical reasoning and management decisions out loud

Viva scenarioAdvanced
Clinical prompt

A 42-year-old right-hand-dominant carpenter sustains a displaced intra-articular distal radius fracture after a fall from height. Post-reduction radiographs show 4 mm of radial shortening, 15 degrees of dorsal tilt, and a 3 mm intra-articular step-off at the sigmoid notch. How do you manage this patient?

Practical approach
This fracture exceeds acceptable parameters for non-operative treatment in a young, high-demand manual worker. Radial shortening greater than 2 mm, dorsal tilt greater than 10 degrees, and intra-articular step-off greater than 2 mm are all indications for surgery. The sigmoid notch involvement raises concern for DRUJ instability. **Pre-operative plan**: CT scan to fully characterise the articular fragments and sigmoid notch involvement. Plan for open reduction and volar locking plate fixation via the modified Henry approach. Counsel the patient on the need for anatomic reduction, the risk of flexor or extensor tendon complications, and the possibility of DRUJ instability requiring additional procedures. **Operative goals**: Restore radial height, inclination and volar tilt to within 2 mm and 5 degrees of the contralateral wrist. Achieve anatomic reduction of the articular surface with less than 1 mm step or gap. Stabilise the volar ulnar fragment to protect the sigmoid notch. Assess and address DRUJ stability intraoperatively. **Key technical points**: Position the plate proximal to the watershed line. Use subchondral locking screws measured 2 mm short of the dorsal cortex. Confirm reduction and screw position with multiple fluoroscopic views plus direct joint inspection. Perform the shuck test before closure and stabilise the DRUJ if unstable. **Post-operative**: Early mobilisation under hand therapy supervision. Monitor for tendon irritation and CRPS. Expect return to light duties at 8 weeks and full manual work at 4 months.
Viva scenarioAdvanced
Clinical prompt

You have just applied a volar locking plate to a comminuted distal radius fracture. On the 10-degree lateral fluoroscopic view you notice that one of the ulnar-most distal locking screws appears to be entering the distal radioulnar joint. What do you do?

Practical approach
An intra-articular screw in the sigmoid notch is unacceptable and must be corrected immediately. The screw is likely too long, too ulnar, or at an incorrect angle. **Immediate action**: Loosen or remove the offending screw. Reassess the reduction of the volar ulnar fragment — this fragment is often the key to sigmoid notch stability. If the fragment is displaced, it may need to be reduced and secured with a separate small fragment screw or K-wire before reapplying the locking screw in a safer trajectory. **Technique adjustment**: Use variable-angle locking screws if available to redirect the screw away from the joint. Confirm the new position with multiple views including a true lateral and an oblique view profiling the sigmoid notch. If doubt remains, perform a small arthrotomy or arthroscopy to directly visualise the joint surface. **Prevention for future cases**: Always inspect the sigmoid notch reduction before placing the most ulnar distal screw. Use the 10-degree lateral view routinely and have a low threshold for direct joint inspection in comminuted fractures involving the ulnar column.
Viva scenarioStandard
Clinical prompt

A 68-year-old woman with osteoporosis undergoes volar locking plate fixation of a distal radius fracture. At the 3-month review she complains of pain on the volar radial aspect of the wrist and difficulty flexing the thumb IP joint. What is the likely diagnosis and how do you manage it?

Practical approach
The presentation is classic for attritional rupture of the flexor pollicis longus tendon secondary to plate irritation. The most common cause is plate position distal to the watershed line or a prominent distal edge left exposed because of inadequate pronator quadratus repair. **Diagnosis confirmation**: Clinical examination shows inability to flex the thumb IP joint against resistance with the wrist extended (to put the tendon under tension). Ultrasound or MRI can confirm the rupture and localise the site of attrition. **Management**: Surgical exploration and tendon reconstruction. Options include primary repair if the tendon ends are healthy (rare at 3 months), tendon transfer (EIP to FPL), or interposition grafting. The plate edge must be smoothed or the plate removed if union is solid. The pronator quadratus must be repaired or augmented to cover any remaining hardware. **Prevention**: In future cases, ensure the plate sits proximal to the watershed line. If the fracture pattern forces distal placement, achieve a robust, watertight pronator quadratus repair over the plate. Consider lower-profile plates with rounded edges in osteoporotic patients.
Exam day cheat sheet
Distal Radius ORIF with Volar Locking Plate — Exam Day Summary

References

Evidence

Volar locking plate versus external fixation for distal radius fractures: a randomised controlled trial

Level I
Wei DH, Raizman NM, Bottino CJ, et alJ Bone Joint Surg Am
Evidence

Five-year outcomes of volar plate fixation of distal radius fractures

Level II
Rozental TD, Blazar PE, Franko OI, et alJ Hand Surg Am
Evidence

Complications following volar locking plate fixation of distal radius fractures

Level III
Arora R, Lutz M, Hennerbichler A, et alJ Hand Surg Am
Evidence

Distal radioulnar joint instability after distal radius fracture fixation

Level II
Lindau T, Adlercreutz C, Aspenberg PJ Hand Surg Br
Evidence

Systematic review of complications after volar plating of distal radius fractures

Level I
Wichlas F, Haas NP, Disch A, et alJ Orthop Trauma
Editorially reviewed — transparent references and correction processPublished by OrthoVellum Medical Education TeamEditorial boardMethodologyReview policy
Educational disclosure

Educational content is reviewed for source visibility, editorial coherence, and correction readiness.

No individual clinician credential is claimed unless a named person is shown.

Verify before clinical use; this is not medical advice or a substitute for local guidance.