Dorsal Approach to the Metacarpals and Phalanges

Hand & WristIntermediateCore Procedure

Dorsal Approach to the Metacarpals and Phalanges

Comprehensive guide to the dorsal approach to the metacarpals and phalanges - longitudinal incision, extensor mechanism protection, sagittal band handling, subperiosteal exposure for plating and joint surgery - FRACS/FRCS/EBOT/ABOS exam level

High-yield overview

Longitudinal Incision | Extensor Protection | Subperiosteal Dorsal Cortex Exposure

Critical Dorsal Hand Approach Exam Points
Extensor Mechanism Protection

The extensor tendons must be identified and mobilized rather than divided. At the metacarpal neck the sagittal bands stabilize the central tendon over the MCP joint. If the sagittal band is divided during exposure it must be repaired to prevent postoperative extensor tendon subluxation and loss of MCP extension.

Sensory Nerve Branches

The superficial branches of the radial nerve (thumb, index, middle) and ulnar nerve (ring, little) lie in the subcutaneous plane. They cross the dorsal metacarpals and are at risk with skin incision and retraction. Identify early, protect with vessel loops, and avoid prolonged stretch.

Dorsal Vein Preservation

The dorsal venous network drains the hand and is critical for venous return. Large veins should be preserved or ligated only if absolutely necessary. Excessive venous sacrifice leads to postoperative swelling and stiffness.

Subperiosteal Dissection

Once the extensor tendon is retracted, subperiosteal elevation with a periosteal elevator exposes the dorsal cortex cleanly. Stripping the periosteum too widely risks devascularization of fracture fragments and delayed union.

Sagittal Band Repair

If the sagittal band is divided for exposure it must be repaired with non-absorbable suture at closure. Failure to repair leads to extensor tendon subluxation into the intermetacarpal valley and loss of active MCP extension - a common and preventable complication.

Tourniquet and Positioning

Use an arm tourniquet at 250 mmHg. Hand table with arm board. Fingers can be suspended with Chinese finger traps for traction if needed. Always document tourniquet time and release before closure to check bleeding.

Surgical Imaging

At a Glance

The dorsal approach to the metacarpals and phalanges is the workhorse exposure for the majority of metacarpal and proximal/middle phalanx fractures requiring open reduction and internal fixation. A straight or gently curved longitudinal incision is made directly over the metacarpal or between metacarpal heads for multiple rays. The dorsal veins and sensory branches of the radial and ulnar nerves are identified and protected in the subcutaneous plane. The extensor tendon is mobilized by splitting or retracting the sagittal band at the MCP level or by developing the interval between the extensor tendon and the dorsal cortex more distally. Juncturae tendinum are divided only when necessary for exposure. Subperiosteal dissection exposes the dorsal cortex for plate application. The approach is extensile proximally to the wrist and distally to the DIP joint. Closure emphasizes repair of any divided sagittal bands to maintain extensor tendon centralization.

Mnemonic

DORSALDORSAL HAND - Surgical Steps

Hook:DORSAL approach - protect veins, nerves, and extensor mechanism at every layer.

Mnemonic

DANGERDANGER STRUCTURES - Layer by Layer

Hook:DANGER at every layer - veins first, then nerves, then extensor apparatus.

Mnemonic

EXTENDEXTENSOR HANDLING PRINCIPLES

Hook:EXTEND the exposure while protecting the extensor gliding surface.

Indications and Approach Selection

Primary Indications:

  • Displaced metacarpal shaft, neck, or base fractures requiring ORIF
  • Displaced proximal or middle phalanx fractures
  • Intra-articular fractures of the MCP, PIP, or DIP joints with greater than 2 mm step-off
  • Metacarpal or phalangeal malunion requiring corrective osteotomy
  • MCP joint arthroplasty or synovectomy
  • Extensor tendon repair or reconstruction requiring dorsal exposure
  • Metacarpal or phalangeal nonunion

Why This Approach is Chosen:

The dorsal surface provides direct access to the metacarpal and phalangeal shafts and the dorsal half of the articular surfaces. Plates applied dorsally are biomechanically favorable for resisting bending forces in the hand. The approach avoids the critical neurovascular structures on the volar side (common digital arteries and nerves).

Contraindications:

  • Active infection over the planned incision
  • Severe dorsal soft-tissue loss or burn requiring alternative coverage
  • When volar pathology (flexor tendon, digital nerve) is the primary target - use volar or Bruner approach
  • Isolated volar plate avulsion injuries better accessed volarly

Alternative Approaches:

  • Volar approach (Bruner or midlateral): For flexor tendon or digital neurovascular pathology
  • Lateral approach: For collateral ligament or condylar fractures
  • Combined dorsal-volar: For complex intra-articular fractures with both dorsal and volar fragments

Overview

Definition

Dorsal Approach to the Metacarpals and Phalanges provides direct access to the dorsal cortex of the metacarpal and phalangeal shafts and the dorsal half of the MCP, PIP, and DIP joints.

Key Characteristics:

  • Longitudinal or gently curved dorsal incision
  • Protection of dorsal veins and sensory nerve branches
  • Mobilization of extensor mechanism with sagittal band preservation or repair
  • Subperiosteal exposure of dorsal bone surface
  • Extensile proximally to wrist and distally to fingertip
Clinical Significance

Why This Approach Matters:

  • Most metacarpal and phalangeal fractures requiring surgery are accessed dorsally
  • Allows anatomic reduction and stable plate fixation
  • Critical for correcting rotational malalignment and shortening
  • Examiner favorite for hand operative surgery station

Exam Relevance:

  • High-yield approach for FRACS/FRCS/EBOT/ABOS hand trauma
  • Extensor mechanism handling and sagittal band repair are classic questions

Anatomy

Bony Anatomy:

The metacarpals form the skeletal framework of the hand. Each metacarpal has a base, shaft, neck, and head. The phalanges (proximal, middle, distal) follow a similar pattern. The dorsal cortex is relatively flat and subcutaneous, making it ideal for plate application. The metacarpal heads articulate with the proximal phalanges at the MCP joints; the proximal phalanx head articulates with the middle phalanx at the PIP joint.

Soft Tissue Layers - Dorsal Hand:

From superficial to deep:

  1. Skin and subcutaneous fat
  2. Dorsal venous network and sensory nerve branches (SRN and SUN)
  3. Extensor tendons enveloped by loose areolar tissue
  4. Sagittal bands at MCP level (stabilize extensor tendon centrally)
  5. Juncturae tendinum (interconnect extensor tendons)
  6. Periosteum and dorsal cortex of metacarpal/phalangeal bone
  7. Joint capsule (MCP, PIP, DIP)

Extensor Mechanism Details:

  • Extensor digitorum communis (EDC): central tendon to each finger
  • Extensor indicis proprius (EIP) and extensor digiti minimi (EDM): independent extensors to index and little finger
  • Sagittal bands: transverse fibers at MCP joint that centralize the extensor tendon over the metacarpal head
  • Juncturae tendinum: oblique interconnecting bands between EDC tendons proximal to the MCP joints
  • Lateral bands: formed by contributions from interossei and lumbricals, converge to form terminal extensor tendon at DIP

Neurovascular Anatomy:

  • Superficial radial nerve (SRN): supplies dorsal thumb, index, middle, and radial ring finger skin
  • Dorsal cutaneous branch of ulnar nerve (SUN): supplies dorsal ulnar ring and little finger skin
  • These nerves lie in the subcutaneous plane and cross the operative field

Internervous Plane

Deep Internervous Plane:

There is no true classical internervous plane in the dorsal approach to the metacarpals and phalanges. The extensor tendons are all supplied by the radial nerve (posterior interosseous nerve for finger extensors). The approach is therefore an intertendinous or sub-tendinous interval rather than an internervous one.

  • At the metacarpal level the interval is developed between the extensor tendon and the dorsal periosteum after the tendon is mobilized.
  • At the MCP joint the sagittal band may be split longitudinally or the tendon retracted after partial release.
  • Distally on the phalanx the extensor tendon is mobilized or the interval between the central slip and lateral band is used.

Clinical Relevance:

Because there is no internervous plane, muscle denervation is not a concern. The critical structures to protect are the sensory nerve branches (subcutaneous) and the extensor mechanism itself (to preserve gliding and prevent subluxation).

Internervous Plane Nuance

The dorsal hand approach is best conceptualized as an intermuscular/intertendinous dissection between extensor tendons or between the extensor tendon and bone. The radial nerve has already innervated all extensors proximally in the forearm, so the dorsal hand itself has no motor nerve crossing the field. The real danger is injury to the sensory branches of the radial and ulnar nerves and disruption of the sagittal band stabilization of the extensor tendon at the MCP joint.

Structures at Risk in Each Layer:

Subcutaneous
Structure
Dorsal veins
Protection Strategy
Preserve large channels, ligate only small branches
Subcutaneous
Structure
SRN and SUN branches
Protection Strategy
Identify early, vessel loop, gentle retraction
Extensor apparatus
Structure
Extensor tendon proper
Protection Strategy
Mobilize with skin hooks, keep moist
MCP level
Structure
Sagittal bands
Protection Strategy
Split longitudinally if needed, repair with non-absorbable suture
Extensor apparatus
Structure
Juncturae tendinum
Protection Strategy
Divide only if blocking exposure, repair if possible
Bone
Structure
Periosteum
Protection Strategy
Elevate subperiosteally, limit stripping

Positioning and Patient Setup

Position: Supine with Hand on Hand Table

Pre-positioning Checklist:

  • Arm board attached to operating table
  • Radiolucent hand table confirmed
  • Tourniquet applied to upper arm (250 mmHg)
  • Fingers prepared for possible Chinese finger trap suspension
  • C-arm positioned for AP, lateral, and oblique views of hand
  • Headlight or loupes available for fine dissection

Positioning Details:

  • Patient supine, arm abducted on hand table
  • Shoulder slightly externally rotated, elbow flexed 90 degrees
  • Hand and forearm prepped to above elbow
  • Tourniquet inflated after exsanguination with Esmarch bandage
  • Fingers can be suspended with Chinese finger traps and weights (2-3 kg) for traction if fracture reduction requires it
  • Surgeon sits at the end of the hand table
Tourniquet Safety

Upper arm tourniquet at 250 mmHg. Maximum time 2 hours for adults. Document inflation time. Release tourniquet before closure to identify and control bleeding points. Prolonged tourniquet time increases postoperative pain and stiffness.

Alternative Positioning:

  • For combined dorsal and volar work, the hand can be pronated or supinated as needed during the case
  • For thumb metacarpal or trapezium access, the thumb is abducted and the incision placed more radially

Surface Anatomy and Landmarks

Key Bony Landmarks:

  • Metacarpal heads: palpable knuckles when fist made
  • Metacarpal bases: palpable at carpometacarpal junction, especially 2nd and 5th
  • MCP joint line: 1 cm proximal to metacarpal head prominence
  • PIP joint: middle knuckle, easily palpable
  • DIP joint: distal knuckle

Key Soft Tissue Landmarks:

  • Extensor tendons: visible and palpable on dorsum when fingers extended against resistance
  • Dorsal veins: visible blue network under thin dorsal skin
  • Skin creases: MCP and PIP flexion creases (volar) correspond to joint levels

Incision Planning:

  • Single metacarpal: straight longitudinal incision centered over the metacarpal shaft, from 1 cm proximal to MCP joint to 1 cm distal to fracture or as needed
  • Multiple metacarpals: longitudinal incision in the intermetacarpal valley (between extensor tendons) or two separate incisions
  • MCP joint access: gently curved incision centered over the MCP joint, convex ulnar or radial depending on which side needs exposure
  • Length typically 4-8 cm for metacarpal shaft, shorter or longer as required for phalangeal exposure

Surgical Technique

Patient Position

Supine on operating table with arm abducted on radiolucent hand table. Upper arm tourniquet at 250 mmHg. Elbow flexed 90 degrees, forearm pronated. Headlight and loupes essential. Chinese finger traps available for traction if needed.

Surface Landmarks

Mark the metacarpal shaft or intermetacarpal valley. Identify MCP joint line (1 cm proximal to metacarpal head). Plan longitudinal or gently curved incision 4-8 cm in length centered over the fracture or joint to be exposed.

Skin Preparation

Prep and drape the entire hand and distal forearm. Apply Esmarch bandage for exsanguination before tourniquet inflation. Mark the incision with pen before skin prep to avoid distortion.

Structures at Risk

Superficial Radial Nerve Branches

Most important sensory structure at risk. The SRN divides into multiple branches that cross the dorsum of the thumb, index, and middle metacarpals. Injury causes painful neuroma or numbness on the dorsum of the radial digits. Identify early in the subcutaneous plane and protect with vessel loops throughout the case.

Dorsal Cutaneous Ulnar Nerve

Supplies the dorsum of the ring and little fingers. Crosses the ulnar metacarpals. Same protection principles as SRN. Injury causes numbness and potential neuroma pain on the ulnar dorsum of the hand.

Extensor Tendon and Sagittal Bands

The extensor tendon must be mobilized rather than divided. At the MCP joint the sagittal bands centralize the tendon. If divided they must be repaired to prevent postoperative extensor tendon subluxation into the intermetacarpal valley and loss of active MCP extension.

Juncturae Tendinum

Oblique interconnecting bands between EDC tendons. May require division for exposure. When substantial they should be repaired to maintain extensor balance between adjacent fingers.

Nerve Injury Management:

  • If nerve transected intra-operatively: primary microsurgical repair with 9-0 nylon under microscope
  • If neurapraxia suspected: observe, document, follow up at 3 months with EMG if no recovery
  • Painful neuroma: desensitization, steroid injection, or surgical excision with burial into muscle

Extensile Modifications

Proximal Extension:

The incision can be extended proximally along the radial or ulnar border of the hand to access the carpometacarpal joints or the distal radius. The same subcutaneous nerve protection principles apply. For thumb metacarpal base fractures the incision is placed more radially and can be extended into the anatomic snuffbox if needed for scaphoid or trapezium access.

Distal Extension:

For middle and distal phalanx exposure the incision is carried distally. At the PIP joint the central slip insertion on the middle phalanx base must be protected. If the central slip is divided it must be repaired. For DIP joint exposure the terminal extensor tendon is protected and repaired if divided.

Combined Approaches:

For complex intra-articular fractures with volar and dorsal fragments a combined dorsal and volar (Bruner) approach may be required. Staged or simultaneous depending on soft tissue condition.

Limited Open Techniques:

For selected fractures percutaneous or limited-open techniques with mini-incisions can be used, but the principles of nerve and extensor protection remain identical.

Complications

Intra-operative Complications:

SRN or SUN injury
Prevention
Identify early, vessel loop protection
Management
Primary microsurgical repair if transected
Extensor tendon laceration
Prevention
Careful retraction, skin hooks
Management
Repair with 3-0 or 4-0 braided suture
Sagittal band division without repair
Prevention
Plan repair at closure
Management
Repair with non-absorbable suture
Excessive periosteal stripping
Prevention
Limit stripping to plate footprint
Management
Bone graft if devascularized fragments

Post-operative Complications:

Extensor tendon adhesions/stiffness
Incidence
10-20%
Prevention
Early ROM, extensor gliding exercises
Treatment
Tenolysis if no improvement at 6 months
Extensor tendon subluxation
Incidence
2-5%
Prevention
Sagittal band repair when divided
Treatment
Revision repair or reconstruction
Painful neuroma (SRN/SUN)
Incidence
3-8%
Prevention
Careful nerve handling
Treatment
Desensitization, excision and burial
Infection
Incidence
1-3%
Prevention
Prophylactic antibiotics, sterile technique
Treatment
Irrigation and debridement, antibiotics
Malunion/rotational malalignment
Incidence
5-10%
Prevention
Intra-operative rotational check
Treatment
Corrective osteotomy
Nonunion
Incidence
Less than 5%
Prevention
Stable fixation, bone graft if needed
Treatment
Revision ORIF with bone graft
Extensor Tendon Subluxation

Extensor tendon subluxation into the intermetacarpal valley after sagittal band injury is a classic preventable complication. The patient loses active MCP extension and develops a snapping sensation. Prevention is simple: repair the sagittal band with non-absorbable suture at the time of the index procedure. Treatment of established subluxation requires revision repair or sagittal band reconstruction.

Post-operative Care

Immediate Post-operative:

  • Document neurovascular status (especially SRN/SUN sensation and extensor tendon function)
  • Light compressive dressing with plaster slab in intrinsic plus position
  • Elevate hand above heart level for 48-72 hours
  • Tourniquet time documented

Mobilization Protocol:

  • Days 0-3: Elevation, finger pumps, active ROM of uninvolved joints
  • Days 3-14: Early active and passive ROM of MCP, PIP, DIP as fixation stability allows
  • Weeks 2-6: Progressive strengthening, tendon gliding exercises
  • Weeks 6-12: Full active use, return to light work
  • 3 months: Full unrestricted activity

Follow-up Schedule:

  • 2 weeks: wound check, suture removal, radiographs
  • 6 weeks: radiographs, assess healing, progress activity
  • 3 months: functional assessment, return to full duties
  • 6-12 months: final review for malunion or stiffness

DVT Prophylaxis:

Not routinely required for isolated hand surgery unless patient has additional risk factors.

Exam Viva Scenarios

Practise clinical reasoning and management decisions out loud

Viva scenarioStandard
Scenario 1: Metacarpal Shaft Fracture ORIF
Clinical prompt

A 28-year-old right-hand-dominant carpenter sustains a displaced spiral fracture of the right ring finger metacarpal shaft after a fall. Rotational malalignment is clinically evident. Describe your surgical approach and key technical points.

Practical approach
Assessment begins with full history, mechanism, hand dominance, and functional demands. Clinical examination documents rotational malalignment by observing finger cascade with flexion and extension. Plain radiographs (AP, lateral, oblique) confirm displacement and shortening. CT is obtained if intra-articular extension is suspected. Surgical planning uses a dorsal approach. Supine position, arm tourniquet at 250 mmHg, hand on radiolucent table. Longitudinal incision centered over the ring metacarpal shaft, 5-6 cm in length. Identify and protect the dorsal veins and the relevant SRN or SUN sensory branch with vessel loops. Incise the loose fascia over the extensor tendon. Mobilize the extensor tendon radially or ulnarly with skin hooks without dividing it. If the fracture is at the neck level, split the sagittal band longitudinally on the side opposite the fracture if needed for exposure. Develop the subperiosteal plane with a periosteal elevator to expose the dorsal cortex. Reduce the fracture, confirm rotational alignment by clinical cascade and fluoroscopy, and apply a 2.0 mm or 2.4 mm compression or neutralization plate with at least two screws proximal and distal to the fracture. If the sagittal band was divided, repair it with 3-0 non-absorbable suture before closure. Irrigate, release tourniquet, achieve hemostasis, close skin, and apply intrinsic-plus splint. Post-operative protocol includes elevation, early active ROM within 48-72 hours, and protected splintage for 4-6 weeks. Radiographs at 2 and 6 weeks. Goal is anatomic reduction with less than 2 mm step-off at any articular surface and no rotational malalignment.
Viva scenarioChallenging
Scenario 2: Intra-articular MCP Fracture
Clinical prompt

A 35-year-old pianist presents with a displaced intra-articular fracture of the index MCP joint after a fall onto the knuckle. CT shows a volar fragment with greater than 3 mm step-off and 30% articular surface involvement. Describe your approach and fixation strategy.

Practical approach
This is an intra-articular fracture requiring anatomic reduction. The dorsal approach provides direct visualization of the dorsal half of the joint and access to the volar fragment via capsulotomy or elevation. Position supine with tourniquet. Longitudinal or gently curved incision over the index MCP joint. Protect SRN branches and dorsal veins. Expose the extensor tendon and split the sagittal band in the midline or on the ulnar side to access the joint. Perform a dorsal capsulotomy if needed. Reduce the volar fragment under direct vision using a dental pick or small elevator. Provisionally stabilize with K-wires. Apply a small 1.5 mm or 2.0 mm buttress plate or interfragmentary screws depending on fragment size. Confirm reduction with fluoroscopy (AP, lateral, oblique) aiming for less than 2 mm articular step-off. Repair the sagittal band and capsule. Early protected motion is critical for joint nutrition and to prevent stiffness in a pianist. Key technical points include meticulous handling of the extensor mechanism, repair of the sagittal band, and stable fixation that allows early motion. Bone graft any metaphyseal void if depression is elevated.
Viva scenarioStandard
Scenario 3: Multiple Metacarpal Fractures
Clinical prompt

A 22-year-old motorcyclist sustains displaced fractures of the 2nd, 3rd, and 4th metacarpal shafts. Describe your surgical planning and approach selection for multiple rays.

Practical approach
Multiple metacarpal fractures often require operative stabilization to maintain hand architecture and prevent rotational malalignment. The dorsal approach allows access to all three metacarpals through one or two incisions. Position supine with tourniquet. For three adjacent metacarpals a single longitudinal incision in the intermetacarpal valley (between 2nd-3rd or 3rd-4th) or two separate longitudinal incisions provide adequate exposure. Protect all crossing dorsal veins and the relevant SRN branches. The extensor tendons are mobilized individually. Each metacarpal is reduced and plated separately using 2.0 mm or 2.4 mm plates. Confirm that the finger cascade is restored with no rotational overlap. If the sagittal bands are divided for any metacarpal they are repaired. Closure is standard with early motion protocol. The key principle is to restore the normal metacarpal arch and finger cascade. Multiple incisions may be preferred over a single long incision to preserve dorsal venous drainage.
Exam day cheat sheet
DORSAL APPROACH TO METACARPALS AND PHALANGES

Evidence Base

Evidence

Complications and range of motion following plate fixation of metacarpal and phalangeal fractures

LoE 4
Page SM, Stern PJ
Clinical implication: Highlights the importance of meticulous nerve protection and early motion to minimize stiffness and neuroma complications after dorsal approach
Source: J Hand Surg Am 1998;23(5):827-32
Evidence

Internal fixation of oblique metacarpal fractures. A biomechanical evaluation by impact loading

LoE 4
Firoozbakhsh KK, Moneim MS, Doherty W, Naraghi FF
Clinical implication: Supports dorsal plate fixation as the gold standard for unstable metacarpal shaft fractures requiring anatomic reduction
Source: Clin Orthop Relat Res 1996;(325):296-301
Evidence

Functional anatomy of the thumb sagittal band

LoE 4
Jaibaji M, Rayan GM, Chung KW
Clinical implication: Emphasizes the absolute requirement to repair the sagittal band whenever it is divided during dorsal exposure to prevent extensor subluxation
Source: J Hand Surg Am 2008;33(6):879-84
Evidence

Prognostic Factors for Nonsurgically Treated Sagittal Band Injuries of the Metacarpophalangeal Joint

LoE 4
Roh YH, Hong SW, Gong HS, Baek GH
Clinical implication: Provides evidence-based guidance on when non-operative care suffices versus when surgical repair during dorsal approach is indicated
Source: J Hand Surg Am 2019;44(10):897.e1-897.e5
Editorially reviewed — transparent references and correction processPublished by OrthoVellum Medical Education TeamEditorial boardMethodologyReview policy
Educational disclosure

Educational content is reviewed for source visibility, editorial coherence, and correction readiness.

No individual clinician credential is claimed unless a named person is shown.

Verify before clinical use; this is not medical advice or a substitute for local guidance.