First MTPJ Arthrodesis
First metatarsophalangeal joint fusion for hallux rigidus and salvage for FRCS/FRACS exam preparation
Reviewed by OrthoVellum Editorial Team
Editorial maintenance, source checking, and correction workflow • Published by OrthoVellum Medical Education Team
Dorsal midline or medial approach to first metatarsophalangeal joint | intermediate
Surgical Imaging
Imaging Gallery


Critical Danger Structures and Position Errors
Danger 1: Medial Digital Nerve
Medial plantar digital nerve to hallux. Location: Runs along medial plantar surface of proximal phalanx, vulnerable during medial periosteal dissection and during cup-and-cone reaming of the phalanx base. Protection: Stay dorsal to midaxial line during periosteal stripping, use retractors with care on plantar medial corner. Injury causes permanent numbness medial hallux and painful neuroma.
Danger 2: Malposition — Dorsiflexion
Position error: insufficient dorsiflexion (toe flat to floor). Target is 15 to 20 degrees dorsiflexion relative to the first metatarsal shaft. Too little dorsiflexion means the hallux lies flat and loads the interphalangeal joint during push-off, causing IPJ osteoarthritis. Too much dorsiflexion causes dorsal skin pressure in footwear. Check intraoperatively with the foot flat: hallux tip should just clear the floor.
Danger 3: Malposition — Valgus
Position error: insufficient or excessive valgus. Target is 5 to 10 degrees valgus. Too little valgus (varus) causes the hallux to abut the second toe during gait, producing painful impingement. Too much valgus causes overlapping second toe and cosmetic deformity. Neutral rotation is mandatory — pronation or supination is poorly tolerated and is a common cause of revision.
Danger 4: Shortening
Excessive bone resection causing hallux shortening. Remove cartilage and subchondral sclerosis only — do not sacrifice cortical bone unnecessarily. Shortening alters the weight-bearing platform, transfers load to lesser metatarsals, and causes cosmetic deformity. In Keller's salvage, structural bone graft is mandatory to restore length. Check length against second toe before fixation.
Danger 5: IPJ Arthritis from Over-dorsiflexion
Interphalangeal joint overload. If the fusion is positioned in excessive dorsiflexion (beyond 20 degrees), the ground reaction force during late stance transfers entirely to the IPJ, causing accelerated IPJ degeneration. This is the direct mechanical consequence of malposition and one of the most common late complications requiring revision. Confirm position prior to final tightening.
FUSEFUSE — Critical Steps for First MTPJ Arthrodesis
GRADEGRADE — Coughlin and Shurnas Classification
Primary Indications
Absolute Indications
- Grade IV hallux rigidus (Coughlin and Shurnas classification): bone-on-bone with rigid, globally painful first MTPJ
- Failed cheilectomy for advanced hallux rigidus with persistent or worsening symptoms
- Rheumatoid arthritis forefoot with first MTPJ destruction (often combined with lesser MTPJ procedures)
- Salvage of failed Keller's resection arthroplasty or resection arthroplasty (requires bone graft to restore length)
Relative Indications
- Grade III hallux rigidus in heavy-demand patients where cheilectomy alone unlikely to maintain function
- Hallux valgus with coexisting first MTPJ osteoarthritis where correction and arthrodesis provide combined solution
- Neuromuscular hallux valgus with MTPJ degeneration (e.g., cerebral palsy, poliomyelitis) where softtissue correction alone insufficient
- First ray hypermobility with symptomatic MTPJ osteoarthritis
- Septic arthritis with irreversible joint destruction after infection clearance
Contraindications
- Active infection at operative site (relative: treat infection first, delayed arthrodesis acceptable)
- Severe peripheral vascular disease precluding healing (absolute)
- Avascular necrosis of the first metatarsal head without revascularisation potential (relative)
- Patient with IPJ arthritis who understands accelerated IPJ loading after fusion (discuss; not absolute contraindication but requires counselling)
- Unrealistic patient expectations about footwear limitations post-fusion
Coughlin and Shurnas Classification (2003)
Grade 0: No pain, full dorsiflexion ROM greater than 60 degrees, no radiographic changes.
Grade I: Mild dorsal aching, mild restriction of motion (40 to 60 degrees), dorsal osteophyte only, no joint space narrowing.
Grade II: Moderate pain, moderate restriction of motion (30 to 40 degrees), dorsal and lateral osteophytes, less than 25% joint space loss.
Grade III: Severe pain and stiffness, motion markedly restricted (10 to 30 degrees), extensive osteophytosis with dorsal, lateral, and medial involvement, more than 25% joint space loss, subchondral cysts and sclerosis. IPJ may have limited motion. Sesamoids may be involved.
Grade IV: All Grade III features plus complete loss of joint space (bone-on-bone) on radiograph; rigid MTPJ; may have loose bodies, sesamoid destruction.
Surgical Implication: Grades I and II — cheilectomy (removes the dorsal 25 to 30% of the metatarsal head, restoring the plantarflexion arc). Grade III — cheilectomy with possible Moberg phalanx osteotomy or interpositional arthroplasty if more than half the metatarsal head cartilage remains; if under 50% cartilage remains, treat as for Grade IV. Grade IV — first MTPJ arthrodesis is the reference standard. The original Coughlin and Shurnas rule was that arthrodesis is indicated for Grade IV, or for Grade III with under 50% of the metatarsal head cartilage remaining at surgery.
Clinical Decision Scenarios
Use these scenarios to practise clinical reasoning and management decisions
"You are performing a first MTPJ arthrodesis for Grade IV hallux rigidus using cup-and-cone reaming. After provisional K-wire fixation you place the foot flat on the table. The hallux tip is pressing firmly against the table surface. What does this mean and what do you do?"
"A 58-year-old woman had a Keller's resection arthroplasty for hallux rigidus at another institution 12 years ago. She now presents with severe pain, instability, and a floppy hallux. She cannot push off from the ground. Her radiographs show the classic 'floppy toe' deformity with proximal phalanx resection. How do you approach the surgical management?"
"A colleague presents you with a 47-year-old male with painful stiff first MTPJ. He has 20 degrees of dorsiflexion, bone-on-bone on radiograph, global pain, sesamoid involvement, and has failed conservative treatment including NSAIDs and orthotic insoles for 18 months. Your colleague says he would like to perform a cheilectomy. Do you agree? What would you recommend?"
First MTPJ Arthrodesis — Exam Summary
Clinical summary
References
According to PubMed, the following references have been individually verified (title, authors, journal, year, pages and PMID). DOI links are provided where PubMed returned a DOI.
-
Coughlin MJ, Shurnas PS. Hallux rigidus: grading and long-term results of operative treatment. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85(11):2072–2088. PMID 14630834. Landmark five-grade classification; 97% of patients good/excellent overall and 92% of cheilectomies successful; arthrodesis indicated for Grade IV or Grade III with under 50% metatarsal head cartilage remaining.
-
McNeil DS, Baumhauer JF, Glazebrook MA. Evidence-based analysis of the efficacy for operative treatment of hallux rigidus. Foot Ankle Int. 2013;34(1):15–32. PMID 23386758. DOI. Systematic review of 135 studies; arthrodesis the only procedure reaching fair evidence (Grade B); all alternatives Grade C.
-
Gibson JNA, Thomson CE. Arthrodesis or total replacement arthroplasty for hallux rigidus: a randomized controlled trial. Foot Ankle Int. 2005;26(9):680–690. PMID 16174497. DOI. RCT (22 arthrodesis vs 27 arthroplasty); greater pain relief and all-united fusions versus 6 of 39 implant components removed; cost ratio 2:1 favouring fusion.
-
Goucher NR, Coughlin MJ. Hallux metatarsophalangeal joint arthrodesis using dome-shaped reamers and dorsal plate fixation: a prospective study. Foot Ankle Int. 2006;27(11):869–876. PMID 17144945. DOI. 50 patients/54 feet; dome reaming with low-profile dorsal titanium plate and crossed lag screws; 92% union (8% nonunion), 96% satisfaction.
-
Flavin R, Stephens MM. Arthrodesis of the first metatarsophalangeal joint using a dorsal titanium contoured plate. Foot Ankle Int. 2004;25(11):783–787. PMID 15574236. DOI. Prospective series; low-profile contoured plate plus compression screw over ball-and-socket preparation; union at 6 weeks, dorsiflexion 20 to 25 degrees relative to first metatarsal.
-
Mann RA, Oates JC. Arthrodesis of the first metatarsophalangeal joint. Foot Ankle. 1980;1(3):159–166. PMID 7319432. DOI. 41 toes in 28 patients; 95% fusion; foundational outcome series for first MTPJ arthrodesis including rheumatoid forefoot.
-
Raikin SM, Ahmad J, Pour AE, Abidi N. Comparison of arthrodesis and metallic hemiarthroplasty of the hallux metatarsophalangeal joint. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89(9):1979–1985. PMID 17768195. DOI. Severe first MTPJ OA; 24% hemiarthroplasty failure with plantar stem cut-out; all 27 arthrodeses united; AOFAS-HMI, pain and satisfaction superior with fusion.
-
Brodsky JW, Baum BS, Pollo FE, Mehta H. Prospective gait analysis in patients with first metatarsophalangeal joint arthrodesis for hallux rigidus. Foot Ankle Int. 2007;28(2):162–165. PMID 17296132. DOI. Instrumented gait analysis in 23 patients; significant increase in maximal ankle push-off power and single-limb support after fusion.
-
Hyer CF, Glover JP, Berlet GC, Lee TH. Cost comparison of crossed screws versus dorsal plate construct for first metatarsophalangeal joint arthrodesis. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2008;47(1):13–18. PMID 18156059. DOI. 45 fusions; overall fusion 91.1%; no significant difference in time-to-fusion between crossed screws and dorsal plate; plate implants cost significantly more.