Skip to main content
OrthoVellumOrthopaedic Exam Prep
Pricing
About OrthoVellum
OrthoVellum
A living orthopaedic atlas

Exam-focused orthopaedic references, a question bank, viva practice, and spaced-repetition revision β€” with every clinical claim traceable to its source. Content is educational only and is not a substitute for local supervision, clinical judgement, or institutional policy.


Library

  • Clinical Topics
  • Blog
  • Site Updates
  • Content Methodology

Company

  • About Us
  • Authors & Disclosure
  • Editorial Team
  • Editorial Policy
  • Advertising Policy

Legal

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Medical Disclaimer
  • Copyright & DMCA

Support

  • Support OrthoVellum
  • Help Center
  • Contact
  • Accessibility
Evidence. Clarity. Practice.

Β© 2026 OrthoVellum. For educational purposes only.

Not medical advice. Verify clinically important information against current local guidance.

Flexor Tendon Repair - Zone 2

Operative SurgeryHand & Wrist
Hand & WristAdvancedCore Procedure

Flexor Tendon Repair - Zone 2

Comprehensive surgical technique guide for Zone 2 flexor tendon repair including multi-strand core suture techniques, pulley preservation strategies, and early active motion protocols for optimal functional outcomes

Procedure console
28
Read
0
Sections
advanced
Level
Peer-reviewed Β· 2026-06-20
High-yield overview

Primary surgical repair of acute flexor tendon lacerations in Zone 2 ('no man's land') using multi-strand core suture techniques with pulley preservation and early active motion rehabilitation

HandSubspecialty
15Key operative steps
5Critical danger structures
60–90 minTypical duration
Critical Must-Knows
  • Zone 2 runs from the A1 pulley to the FDS insertion β€” 'no man's land' β€” where both FDP and FDS run together inside a tight sheath with the critical pulley system, giving it the worst prognosis and the highest adhesion risk.
  • A2 and A4 are the CRITICAL pulleys, providing 75 percent of pulley force (A2 fifty percent, A4 twenty-five percent). Preserve at least 50 percent of each; all three cruciate (C) pulleys can be sacrificed for exposure.
  • A minimum 4-strand core suture plus an epitendinous suture is required for early active motion (greater than 50 N strength). 6-strand techniques (Adelaide, Savage) deliver 60–80 N and are preferred.
  • Early active motion started within 3–5 days roughly halves the adhesion rate compared with immobilisation β€” but it demands a strong repair, a compliant patient, and an expert hand therapist.
  • The dorsal blocking splint holds the WRIST and MCPs FLEXED but the IP joints in FULL EXTENSION β€” counter-intuitive, but it protects the repair while preventing a PIP flexion contracture.

When & Why


Indication. An acute complete flexor tendon laceration in Zone 2 β€” classically a sharp knife or glass injury with loss of active flexion at the PIP and/or DIP joint β€” repaired primarily, ideally within 7–10 days, in a patient who is medically fit for surgery and able to commit to three months of intensive hand therapy. Repair is mandatory when the FDP is completely divided (it is the only flexor of the DIP joint; a finger without it is non-functional), and for a partial FDP laceration involving greater than 50 percent of the cross-section. Indications fall into absolute and relative groups: - Absolute: acute complete FDP laceration in Zone 2 (less than 7–10 days old); combined complete FDP and FDS lacerations; partial FDP laceration greater than 50 percent of cross-section; clean sharp injury with minimal contamination; patient medically fit and able to comply with therapy.

  • Relative: isolated FDS laceration (controversial β€” many observe); subacute injury 10–21 days old (repair still possible but harder); partial laceration 25–50 percent (may heal without repair if FDP intact, but risks triggering); tendon injury with an associated digital nerve or artery injury that will be repaired at the same sitting. Contraindications also split into absolute and relative: - Absolute: active infection (pyogenic flexor tenosynovitis β€” drain first and reconstruct later); severe crush with devitalised tissue (staged reconstruction preferred); extensive soft-tissue loss preventing skin closure; a patient unable to comply with therapy (cognitive impairment, severe psychiatric disease); medical comorbidities precluding safe surgery (unstable cardiac disease, coagulopathy); severe underlying inflammatory arthropathy (rheumatoid β€” the repair is likely to fail).
  • Relative: delayed presentation greater than 3 weeks (tendon retraction and scarring β€” consider staged); human or animal bite injury (high infection risk β€” irrigate, give antibiotics, delay repair 3–5 days); multiple-digit involvement (prolonged surgery β€” consider staging); heavy smoker; diabetes with neuropathy; previous failed flexor repair in the same digit; significant IP joint arthritis (repair will not improve a destroyed joint). Timing governs what is technically possible. The tendon ends are freshest and easiest to retrieve in the first week; after that, retraction and scarring make primary repair progressively harder, and beyond about six weeks a staged reconstruction is usually the better plan.
Acute
Timing
0–7 days
Characteristics and approach
Ideal. Fresh tendon ends, minimal retraction and scarring, best functional outcomes
Subacute
Timing
7–21 days
Characteristics and approach
Still possible but technically harder; early retraction and scar; more dissection needed
Delayed primary
Timing
21 days to 6 weeks
Characteristics and approach
Challenging; significant retraction, often retrieval from palm or forearm; consider staged reconstruction
Chronic
Timing
Greater than 6 weeks
Characteristics and approach
Primary repair not recommended; proceed to staged reconstruction (Hunter rod then graft) or tendon transfer
Timing windows for primary repair
WindowTimingCharacteristics and approach
Acute0–7 daysIdeal. Fresh tendon ends, minimal retraction and scarring, best functional outcomes
Subacute7–21 daysStill possible but technically harder; early retraction and scar; more dissection needed
Delayed primary21 days to 6 weeksChallenging; significant retraction, often retrieval from palm or forearm; consider staged reconstruction
ChronicGreater than 6 weeksPrimary repair not recommended; proceed to staged reconstruction (Hunter rod then graft) or tendon transfer

Favourable prognostic factors are a sharp clean laceration (not a crush), a single-structure injury, presentation within 48 hours, a young motivated patient, no crush component, and an index or long finger (which tolerate injury and FDS loss better than the ring or small). Adverse factors are the mirror image: crush mechanism, combined nerve/artery/bone injuries, delayed repair, significant pulley loss (greater than 50 percent of A2 or A4), infection, non-compliance, older age (over 60), smoking, diabetes, and high manual demands. Consent specifically for the intensive three-month therapy commitment, a realistic expectation of 75–85 percent good or excellent results, a 2–5 percent rupture rate, around a 15 percent chance of needing a second operation (tenolysis for stiffness or re-repair/reconstruction for rupture), and the possibility of triggering, a PIP contracture, or CRPS. Setup. Supine on the operating table, arm on a radiolucent hand table, shoulder abducted 80–90 degrees, elbow extended and hand supinated. Use a high-arm tourniquet at 250 mmHg (exsanguinate with Esmarch or elevation). Anaesthesia may be general, a brachial plexus block (axillary or supraclavicular), or β€” increasingly the modern standard β€” WALANT (wide-awake local anaesthesia, no tourniquet) using 1 percent lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine, which lets you test active motion intra-operatively and tailors pulley venting to the actual gliding observed. Loupe magnification (2.5–3.5Γ—) or the microscope (4–6Γ—) is mandatory β€” this is fine, precision surgery.

The Operation


The goal is to retrieve both tendon ends, restore FDP (and selectively FDS) continuity with a strong multi-strand core plus an epitendinous suture that glides smoothly through a preserved A2/A4 pulley system, and protect the repair in a dorsal blocking splint so that early active motion can begin within days. The exposure is laid out in full below (and in depth on the Bruner volar zigzag approach to the digit page).

Zone 2 flexor tendon repair
Zone 2 flexor tendon repair with a multi-strand core suture within the flexor sheath.Credit: OrthoVellum surgical illustration

Operative sequence

Step 1Position, setup and exposure planning
  • Supine, hand table, high-arm tourniquet at 250 mmHg, elbow extended, hand supinated; loupes (2.5–3.5Γ—) on.
  • Mark the laceration and plan the Bruner zigzag extensions BEFORE inflating the tourniquet, when skin landmarks are clearest.
  • Have fine instruments, a paediatric feeding tube (6 Fr) for tendon retrieval, 3-0/4-0 braided non-absorbable core suture (Ethibond, Ticron, FiberWire), 5-0/6-0 monofilament for the epitendinous (Prolene, Nylon), and vessel loops ready.
Step 2The exposure β€” Bruner zigzag incision
  • Extend the traumatic laceration with Bruner zigzag incisions, each segment angled 60 degrees to the flexion creases (never perpendicular β€” a 90-degree crossing causes web-space contracture).
  • Place the apex of each zigzag at the mid-axial line, with each limb 5–8 mm long; extend proximally into the palm with further zigzags if the tendon has retracted.
  • Raise full-thickness skin flaps (skin and subcutaneous fat together) β€” this avoids undermining and skin-flap necrosis, especially at the zigzag apices.
  • A mid-lateral incision along the mid-axial line is the alternative: simpler and safer for the skin, preserves one neurovascular bundle unviolated, but gives more limited exposure. A straight volar longitudinal incision crossing the creases is contraindicated (hypertrophic scar and flexion contracture).
Step 3Protect the neurovascular bundles and open the sheath β€” preserve A2 and A4
  • Identify both digital neurovascular bundles BEFORE opening the sheath β€” they run 2–3 mm from the sheath edge; retract them gently with moist vessel loops and avoid cautery within 5 mm of the nerve.
  • Mark the edges of the flexor sheath with a pen (it aids closure). Open the sheath BETWEEN pulleys to expose the tendons.
  • Preserve A2 (over the proximal phalanx) and A4 (over the middle phalanx) β€” these are critical. Excise or widely vent the C1, C2 and C3 cruciate pulleys for exposure (all are expendable).
  • If the repair will be bulky, the distal 25 percent of A2 or the proximal 25 percent of A4 may be vented provided the central portions are kept; at least 50 percent of each must remain intact.
Step 4Retrieve the retracted proximal tendon ends
  • The proximal FDP end commonly retracts into the palm or carpal tunnel (pulled by lumbrical action and FDP muscle contraction); FDS usually retracts less and stays in the finger.
  • Retrieve by (1) gentle milking from the proximal palm toward the finger, or (2) passing a paediatric feeding tube (6 Fr) proximally through the sheath, making a small 1 cm transverse incision in the distal palmar crease, retrieving the tube, passing a suture through the FDP end with a Keith needle, tying it to the tube and pulling the tendon back into the finger.
  • Identify BOTH tendons and mark orientation (e.g. the volar surface, or an asymmetric suture) to avoid rotation, which causes maltracking and poor excursion.
Step 5Assess and prepare the tendon ends
  • Define the extent of each laceration (complete versus partial, percentage of cross-section). FDP repair is mandatory β€” it is the only DIP flexor.
  • Decide on FDS based on sheath capacity, the finger involved (index/long tolerate FDS loss better), and the extent of injury (see the FDS options below).
  • Freshen the tendon ends with a sharp blade perpendicular to the long axis, with minimal debridement β€” trim only crushed tissue. Each millimetre of lost length adds tension and shortening, risking the quadriga effect.
Step 6Core suture β€” multi-strand FDP repair
  • Place a minimum 4-strand, preferably 6-strand (Adelaide or Savage), core suture using 3-0 or 4-0 braided non-absorbable (Ethibond, Ticron, FiberWire).
  • Use a locking configuration (20–30 percent stronger than grasping); purchase the tendon 7–12 mm from the cut edge with each pass to prevent cheese-wiring.
  • Ensure no gap at the repair site (less than 1 mm acceptable), equal tension on all strands, and bury the knots so they do not catch on the pulleys.
  • Strength: 4-strand = 40–50 N; 6-strand = 60–80 N. You need greater than 50 N to safely run an early active motion protocol.
Step 7Epitendinous (running peripheral) suture
  • Run a continuous peripheral suture with 5-0 or 6-0 monofilament (Prolene, Nylon), starting 180 degrees from the core knot, bites 0.5–1 mm deep and 2 mm apart.
  • Techniques include simple running, the cross-stitch (Lin) β€” a running locked figure-of-eight that is the strongest and gives the smoothest surface β€” and the Halstead modification.
  • This adds 10–50 percent to repair strength (average 25 percent), inverts the tendon edges to create a smooth gliding surface, buries the core knots, and resists gap formation.
  • Nuance: high-volume Zone 2 series (Pan/Tang) show that a well-tensioned strong multi-strand core needs only three to four sparse peripheral stitches rather than a full circumferential epitendinous suture β€” the core tension, not the peripheral stitch, is the key to gap resistance.
Step 8FDS management
  • If repairing FDS, fewer strands are acceptable (2–4 strand). If excising a slip, divide it distal to the chiasm of Camper and remove it completely to the A1 pulley level β€” never leave stumps (they form an adhesion nidus).
  • The decision is a balance between preserving PIP flexion power and avoiding over-bulking in a tight sheath:
Repair both FDS slips

Maximum PIP flexion power; best in the ring and small fingers that need independent PIP flexion. Risks over-bulking and adhesions in a tight sheath.

Repair one, excise one

The common compromise. Usually repair the radial/dorsal slip and excise the ulnar/volar slip β€” reduces bulk while keeping some FDS function. Remove the excised slip completely.

Excise both slips

Preferred by some in a tight Zone 2 sheath β€” least bulk and fewest adhesions. Fingers function well on FDP alone, especially index and long.

Operative sequence (continued)

Step 9The catching test β€” confirm smooth gliding
  • With the sheath still open, passively flex and extend the finger while watching the tendon glide under loupe magnification. It must glide smoothly, with no catching or jerking.
  • If it catches, troubleshoot in order: check the core knots are buried (not on the surface); check the epitendinous for bunching (redo with shallower, even bites); vent all C pulleys completely; if still bulky, consider venting the distal 25 percent of A2 or proximal 25 percent of A4 (keep the central portions); or sacrifice FDS to reduce bulk; and smooth any sharp pulley edges with micro-scissors.
  • Any catching under direct vision in theatre WILL trigger post-operatively β€” fix it before closing. Confirm there is no bowstringing (the tendon should stay close to bone on flexion).
Step 10Flexor sheath closure (loose, with vents)
  • Close the sheath loosely with 5-0 or 6-0 absorbable suture (Vicryl, Monocryl), leaving vents β€” do not close the whole sheath circumferentially.
  • Close enough to maintain pulley geometry but allow synovial fluid circulation; many surgeons close only at the pulley sites and leave the cruciate areas open.
  • The principle is a loose closure with no tension on the repair. Tight circumferential closure strangulates the repair and guarantees triggering.
Step 11Skin closure and dressing
  • Close the skin with 4-0 or 5-0 non-absorbable interrupted sutures (Nylon, Prolene), vertical mattress or simple interrupted, tension-free. For a Bruner incision, close the zigzag apices first to align the pattern.
  • Apply a non-adherent dressing (Xeroform, Adaptic) directly on the wound, then light gauze β€” no pressure dressing.
  • Check digital perfusion: capillary refill less than 2 seconds, fingertip pink. A dusky finger or slow refill means the dressing is too tight or a vessel has been injured.
Step 12Dorsal blocking splint
  • Apply a dorsal blocking splint in theatre, moulded dorsally in thermoplastic material so it blocks extension but allows full flexion.
  • Position: wrist 20–30 degrees flexion, MCPs 70–80 degrees flexion, IP joints 0 degrees (full extension). The wrist and MCPs are flexed to take tension off the repair; the IP joints are kept extended to prevent a PIP flexion contracture.
  • Within this splint the patient can make a full fist but cannot extend the wrist or MCPs. (A Kleinert splint with rubber-band traction from nail to palmar wrist band is an alternative that gives passive flexion and blocks active extension.)
Step 13Confirm repair quality and the cascade
  • Before closing, document the repair quality: visual inspection (no gap, smooth contour, no bunching); passive ROM (smooth gliding through the pulleys); gentle traction on the proximal tendon (should hold 30–40 N without gapping); and the cascade (the finger rests in a normal cascade with the wrist neutral).
  • Classify the repair β€” OPTIMAL (6-strand plus epitendinous plus pulleys intact), GOOD (4-strand plus epitendinous plus greater than 80 percent pulleys), ACCEPTABLE (4-strand plus partial epitendinous), SUBOPTIMAL (fewer than 4 strands or greater than 50 percent pulley loss) β€” because this determines the rehabilitation protocol.
Step 14Combined injuries β€” repair sequence
  • If a fracture, artery and/or nerve are also injured, repair in sequence: (1) skeletal stability first (K-wire or mini-plate), (2) artery if both are cut (at least one patent artery per digit), (3) flexor tendon (the longest step β€” do it before the nerve so you can tension the tendon without pulling the nerve), (4) digital nerve last (if both are cut; a single clean nerve laceration may be observed).
  • Combined injuries carry a worse prognosis (good results fall from 75–85 percent to 50–60 percent from added scarring), and often warrant a more conservative (passive) motion protocol.
The five structures you must not injure
  • Radial and ulnar digital neurovascular bundles β€” run 2–3 mm from each sheath edge. Identify them before opening the sheath, retract gently with vessel loops, avoid cautery near the nerve, and preserve at least one digital artery per finger.
  • A2 and A4 annular pulleys β€” provide 75 percent of pulley force. Preserve at least 50 percent of each (ideally the central portion); vent only the distal A2 or proximal A4 if needed. Loss of greater than 50 percent of either causes bowstringing and a weak grip even if the tendon heals.
  • Vincula β€” the delicate dorsal vascular mesenteries (vinculum longus and brevis to FDP and FDS) that feed the tendon. Minimise sheath opening and handle tendon gently; vincula damage brings ischaemia and adhesions.
Splint position is counter-intuitive and examiners love it

The dorsal blocking splint holds the WRIST and MCPs FLEXED (to protect the repair from tension) but the IP joints in FULL EXTENSION (to prevent a PIP flexion contracture). Patients can make a full fist inside the splint but cannot extend the wrist or MCPs. Getting the IP joints flexed instead of extended is the classic avoidable error β€” it seeds a contracture that is very hard to reverse.

Any intra-operative catching will trigger post-operatively

Passively flex and extend the finger while watching the tendon glide before you close. Any catching under direct vision WILL be worse once swelling and inflammation set in β€” it predicts triggering, adhesions, and a higher rupture risk. Address the cause (buried knots, epitendinous bunching, inadequate cruciate venting, FDS bulk) until gliding is completely smooth. Never accept gliding that is merely "good enough".

Aftercare & Complications


Early active motion is the gold-standard protocol β€” it roughly halves the adhesion rate compared with immobilisation β€” but it requires a strong repair (greater than 50 N), a motivated compliant patient, an expert hand therapist, and close weekly monitoring at first.

Immediate
Timing
Day 0–2
Splint
Dorsal blocking splint applied in theatre
Therapy
Hand elevated above the heart; ice and pain control only
Early active
Timing
Day 3–5
Splint
Splint on continuously
Therapy
Active flexion (make a fist β€” full composite flexion), passive extension, place-and-hold 5 seconds; 10 reps every waking hour (8–10 sessions/day)
Protected
Timing
Week 1–4
Splint
Splint full-time (off only for therapy)
Therapy
Progress active flexion; add blocking (isolate FDP/FDS); weekly ROM checks; sutures out day 10–14
Intermediate
Timing
Week 4–6
Splint
Splint continues
Therapy
Gentle passive extension out of the splint (therapist-supervised); differential gliding
Wean
Timing
Week 6–8
Splint
Daytime off gradually, night splint 2–4 more weeks
Therapy
Progressive active ROM; light ADLs
Strengthen
Timing
Week 8–10
Splint
Discontinue splint
Therapy
Gentle strengthening (soft putty); light gripping
Return
Timing
Week 10–12
Splint
None
Therapy
Progress resistance and function; unrestricted activities by week 12 (manual labourers 14–16 weeks)
Early active motion protocol β€” timeline
PhaseTimingSplintTherapy
ImmediateDay 0–2Dorsal blocking splint applied in theatreHand elevated above the heart; ice and pain control only
Early activeDay 3–5Splint on continuouslyActive flexion (make a fist β€” full composite flexion), passive extension, place-and-hold 5 seconds; 10 reps every waking hour (8–10 sessions/day)
ProtectedWeek 1–4Splint full-time (off only for therapy)Progress active flexion; add blocking (isolate FDP/FDS); weekly ROM checks; sutures out day 10–14
IntermediateWeek 4–6Splint continuesGentle passive extension out of the splint (therapist-supervised); differential gliding
WeanWeek 6–8Daytime off gradually, night splint 2–4 more weeksProgressive active ROM; light ADLs
StrengthenWeek 8–10Discontinue splintGentle strengthening (soft putty); light gripping
ReturnWeek 10–12NoneProgress resistance and function; unrestricted activities by week 12 (manual labourers 14–16 weeks)

Alternative protocols apply when the repair is not strong enough for full early active motion, or compliance is in doubt:

Early active motion
Mechanism
Active flexion within a dorsal blocking splint
Adhesion rate
10–15%
Use when
Strong repair (greater than 50 N), compliant patient, expert therapist β€” the default
Modified Kleinert
Mechanism
Rubber-band traction from nail to palmar wrist band β€” passive flexion, active extension blocked
Adhesion rate
15–25%
Use when
Repair strength questionable or compliance concerns
Controlled active (place-and-hold)
Mechanism
Limited-arc active flexion to the distal palmar crease, place-and-hold, no forceful flexion
Adhesion rate
Intermediate
Use when
Moderate-strength repairs β€” a compromise
Immobilisation
Mechanism
Splint for 3 weeks, then passive 3 weeks, then active after 6 weeks
Adhesion rate
30–40%
Use when
Very weak repairs, poor compliance, combined injuries β€” essentially abandoned in modern practice
Alternative rehabilitation protocols
ProtocolMechanismAdhesion rateUse when
Early active motionActive flexion within a dorsal blocking splint10–15%Strong repair (greater than 50 N), compliant patient, expert therapist β€” the default
Modified KleinertRubber-band traction from nail to palmar wrist band β€” passive flexion, active extension blocked15–25%Repair strength questionable or compliance concerns
Controlled active (place-and-hold)Limited-arc active flexion to the distal palmar crease, place-and-hold, no forceful flexionIntermediateModerate-strength repairs β€” a compromise
ImmobilisationSplint for 3 weeks, then passive 3 weeks, then active after 6 weeks30–40%Very weak repairs, poor compliance, combined injuries β€” essentially abandoned in modern practice

Monitoring. Review weekly for the first month (active flexion ROM fingertip-to-distal-palmar-crease, passive extension deficit at each joint, signs of rupture, infection, triggering, and PIP contracture), then biweekly and monthly adding strength and functional testing (Jamar grip, pinch gauge, Jebsen-Taylor). Red flags requiring urgent assessment are sudden loss of active flexion (rupture), severe increasing pain with fusiform swelling (infection or CRPS), locking or severe triggering, a progressive PIP contracture greater than 20 degrees, and Kanavel's signs of flexor sheath infection. A plateau β€” active ROM still less than 50 percent of normal at three months despite optimal therapy β€” prompts consideration of tenolysis at four to six months once scar has matured. Complications. The overall complication rate is 25–35 percent, though most are minor. The table below covers recognition, prevention and management of the major ones.

Adhesions (15–25 percent need tenolysis) β€” the most common complication
Recognition
Progressive limitation of active ROM despite full passive ROM (active lag); plateau by 8–12 weeks; active flexion less than 50 percent of passive
Prevention
Atraumatic technique; strong repair allowing early active motion; preserve pulleys and vincula; early active motion within 3–5 days
Management
Intensive therapy for 3–4 months; if ROM is less than 50 percent and plateaued, tenolysis at 4–6 months (gain in 60–70 percent; 5–10 percent rupture post-tenolysis)
Rupture (2–5 percent) β€” peak risk weeks 2–4 (weakest before tendon heals)
Recognition
Sudden loss of active flexion, often a 'pop'; cannot flex the DIP with the PIP held extended; palpable gap; diagnosis is clinical
Prevention
Minimum 4-strand plus epitendinous (greater than 50 N); patient education on avoiding forceful extension; protocol matched to repair strength; smooth gliding; weekly monitoring
Management
Early rupture (less than 6 weeks) β€” direct re-repair may be attempted but fails in 30–40 percent; late or failed re-repair β€” staged reconstruction (Stage 1 Hunter rod plus pulley repair, Stage 2 tendon graft), 60–75 percent good results
PIP flexion contracture (10–20 percent develop greater than 20 degrees)
Recognition
Progressive loss of PIP extension, initially flexible then fixed; volar plate thickening; pain on passive extension stretch
Prevention
Dorsal blocking splint with IP joints in full extension from day 0; early extension exercises; serial static splinting if a deficit develops
Management
Less than 30 degrees at 3 months β€” static progressive/dynamic splinting; 30–50 degrees persistent beyond 6 months β€” PIP capsulotomy (plus tenolysis); greater than 50 degrees or failed capsulotomy β€” fusion or arthroplasty
Triggering / catching (5–10 percent, usually self-limited)
Recognition
Catching or locking with active motion; palpable click over A1 or A2; sudden jerking rather than the smooth limit of adhesions
Prevention
Confirm smooth gliding intra-operatively; vent cruciate pulleys liberally; vent distal A2 or proximal A4 if bulky; do not close the sheath tightly
Management
Mild β€” therapy, NSAIDs, observation (often settles over 6–12 weeks); persistent beyond 3 months β€” A1 release or revision pulley venting; severe locking β€” earlier release
Infection β€” pyogenic flexor tenosynovitis (1–3 percent); surgical emergency
Recognition
Kanavel's four signs: fusiform finger swelling, flexed posture, tenderness along the whole sheath, pain on passive extension (most sensitive); fever, raised WCC/CRP
Prevention
Thorough irrigation (6–9 L for contaminated wounds); debridement; prophylactic antibiotics; delayed primary repair for heavily contaminated wounds
Management
Urgent irrigation and debridement within 24 hours; IV antibiotics (flucloxacillin or vancomycin if MRSA risk); leave open, delayed closure at 3–5 days; delay beyond 48 hours carries up to 30 percent amputation
Quadriga effect (uncommon but significant)
Recognition
Cannot fully flex adjacent fingers (shared FDP muscle belly) when the repaired FDP is too short or over-tensioned; extension lag in adjacent digits on isolated FDP testing
Prevention
Minimal debridement to preserve length; repair with the finger in neutral (not flexed); check adjacent finger flexion intra-operatively; do not over-tighten
Management
Clinical diagnosis; if greater than 1 cm adjacent lag and disabling β€” tendon lengthening or FDP tenotomy of the shortened finger; accept if mild
CRPS type 1 (2–5 percent)
Recognition
Budapest criteria β€” symptoms in 3 of 4 categories (sensory, vasomotor, sudomotor, motor); pain disproportionate to injury; shiny oedematous hand; temperature asymmetry
Prevention
Early mobilisation; adequate analgesia; avoid prolonged splinting; gentle therapy
Management
Therapy mainstay (desensitisation, stress loading, mirror therapy, graded motor imagery); neuropathic agents (gabapentin, pregabalin); sympathetic blocks; psychological support; most resolve over 6–12 months, 10–20 percent become chronic
Major complications of Zone 2 flexor tendon repair
ComplicationRecognitionPreventionManagement
Adhesions (15–25 percent need tenolysis) β€” the most common complicationProgressive limitation of active ROM despite full passive ROM (active lag); plateau by 8–12 weeks; active flexion less than 50 percent of passiveAtraumatic technique; strong repair allowing early active motion; preserve pulleys and vincula; early active motion within 3–5 daysIntensive therapy for 3–4 months; if ROM is less than 50 percent and plateaued, tenolysis at 4–6 months (gain in 60–70 percent; 5–10 percent rupture post-tenolysis)
Rupture (2–5 percent) β€” peak risk weeks 2–4 (weakest before tendon heals)Sudden loss of active flexion, often a 'pop'; cannot flex the DIP with the PIP held extended; palpable gap; diagnosis is clinicalMinimum 4-strand plus epitendinous (greater than 50 N); patient education on avoiding forceful extension; protocol matched to repair strength; smooth gliding; weekly monitoringEarly rupture (less than 6 weeks) β€” direct re-repair may be attempted but fails in 30–40 percent; late or failed re-repair β€” staged reconstruction (Stage 1 Hunter rod plus pulley repair, Stage 2 tendon graft), 60–75 percent good results
PIP flexion contracture (10–20 percent develop greater than 20 degrees)Progressive loss of PIP extension, initially flexible then fixed; volar plate thickening; pain on passive extension stretchDorsal blocking splint with IP joints in full extension from day 0; early extension exercises; serial static splinting if a deficit developsLess than 30 degrees at 3 months β€” static progressive/dynamic splinting; 30–50 degrees persistent beyond 6 months β€” PIP capsulotomy (plus tenolysis); greater than 50 degrees or failed capsulotomy β€” fusion or arthroplasty
Triggering / catching (5–10 percent, usually self-limited)Catching or locking with active motion; palpable click over A1 or A2; sudden jerking rather than the smooth limit of adhesionsConfirm smooth gliding intra-operatively; vent cruciate pulleys liberally; vent distal A2 or proximal A4 if bulky; do not close the sheath tightlyMild β€” therapy, NSAIDs, observation (often settles over 6–12 weeks); persistent beyond 3 months β€” A1 release or revision pulley venting; severe locking β€” earlier release
Infection β€” pyogenic flexor tenosynovitis (1–3 percent); surgical emergencyKanavel's four signs: fusiform finger swelling, flexed posture, tenderness along the whole sheath, pain on passive extension (most sensitive); fever, raised WCC/CRPThorough irrigation (6–9 L for contaminated wounds); debridement; prophylactic antibiotics; delayed primary repair for heavily contaminated woundsUrgent irrigation and debridement within 24 hours; IV antibiotics (flucloxacillin or vancomycin if MRSA risk); leave open, delayed closure at 3–5 days; delay beyond 48 hours carries up to 30 percent amputation
Quadriga effect (uncommon but significant)Cannot fully flex adjacent fingers (shared FDP muscle belly) when the repaired FDP is too short or over-tensioned; extension lag in adjacent digits on isolated FDP testingMinimal debridement to preserve length; repair with the finger in neutral (not flexed); check adjacent finger flexion intra-operatively; do not over-tightenClinical diagnosis; if greater than 1 cm adjacent lag and disabling β€” tendon lengthening or FDP tenotomy of the shortened finger; accept if mild
CRPS type 1 (2–5 percent)Budapest criteria β€” symptoms in 3 of 4 categories (sensory, vasomotor, sudomotor, motor); pain disproportionate to injury; shiny oedematous hand; temperature asymmetryEarly mobilisation; adequate analgesia; avoid prolonged splinting; gentle therapyTherapy mainstay (desensitisation, stress loading, mirror therapy, graded motor imagery); neuropathic agents (gabapentin, pregabalin); sympathetic blocks; psychological support; most resolve over 6–12 months, 10–20 percent become chronic

Return to function. Light work and ADLs by 6–8 weeks, moderate work by 10–12 weeks, heavy manual labour by 14–16 weeks, and contact sports by 12–16 weeks. Maximum medical improvement plateaus at 6–9 months.

Viva & Exam Focus


Mnemonic

PULLEYPULLEY β€” the critical pulleys to preserve

P
Proximal phalanx = A2
A2 sits over the proximal phalanx β€” critical, 50 percent of pulley force
U
Ulnar/radial NV bundles
Identify both before opening the sheath
L
Length preservation
Need at least 1.2 cm total pulley length (A2 plus A4) to avoid bowstringing
L
Leave C pulleys open
All cruciate pulleys (C1, C2, C3) can be sacrificed for exposure
E
Fifty percent minimum
Preserve the central 50 percent of both A2 and A4
Y
Ys β€” chiasm of Camper
Where FDS splits into two slips around FDP in Zone 2
Mnemonic

STRANDSTRAND β€” multi-strand repair essentials

S
Six strands preferred
Adelaide or Savage β€” 60–80 N strength
T
Ten to twelve mm purchase
From the cut edge β€” prevents cheese-wiring
R
Running epitendinous
Mandatory β€” adds 10–50 percent strength and a smooth glide
A
Avoid gap
Greater than 2 mm heals with lengthening and poor function
N
Non-absorbable braided core
3-0 or 4-0 Ethibond or FiberWire
D
Dorsal blocking splint
Wrist/MCPs flexed, IP joints extended
Radial digital neurovascular bundle
Location
2–3 mm radial to the sheath along the digit, with the radial digital artery
How to protect it
Raise full-thickness flaps; identify before opening the sheath; retract gently with a vessel loop; no cautery within 5 mm of the nerve
Ulnar digital neurovascular bundle
Location
2–3 mm ulnar to the sheath, mirror image of the radial bundle
How to protect it
Identify early; gentle retraction; preserve at least one digital artery per finger
A2 annular pulley
Location
Over the proximal half of the proximal phalanx β€” 15–17 mm (index/long), 12–15 mm (ring/small); 50 percent of pulley force
How to protect it
Preserve at least 50 percent (central); may vent the distal 25 percent if bulky; mark edges before opening
A4 annular pulley
Location
Over the middle third of the middle phalanx β€” 7–9 mm; 25 percent of pulley force
How to protect it
Preserve at least 50 percent (central); may vent the proximal 25 percent; combined A2 plus A4 must exceed 1.2 cm
Vincular blood supply
Location
Vinculum longus and brevis to FDP and FDS β€” delicate dorsal vascular mesenteries within the sheath
How to protect it
Minimise sheath opening; handle tendon gently; consider partial sheath closure to preserve synovial nutrition
The five critical structures at risk
StructureLocationHow to protect it
Radial digital neurovascular bundle2–3 mm radial to the sheath along the digit, with the radial digital arteryRaise full-thickness flaps; identify before opening the sheath; retract gently with a vessel loop; no cautery within 5 mm of the nerve
Ulnar digital neurovascular bundle2–3 mm ulnar to the sheath, mirror image of the radial bundleIdentify early; gentle retraction; preserve at least one digital artery per finger
A2 annular pulleyOver the proximal half of the proximal phalanx β€” 15–17 mm (index/long), 12–15 mm (ring/small); 50 percent of pulley forcePreserve at least 50 percent (central); may vent the distal 25 percent if bulky; mark edges before opening
A4 annular pulleyOver the middle third of the middle phalanx β€” 7–9 mm; 25 percent of pulley forcePreserve at least 50 percent (central); may vent the proximal 25 percent; combined A2 plus A4 must exceed 1.2 cm
Vincular blood supplyVinculum longus and brevis to FDP and FDS β€” delicate dorsal vascular mesenteries within the sheathMinimise sheath opening; handle tendon gently; consider partial sheath closure to preserve synovial nutrition

Clinical Decision Scenarios

Practise clinical reasoning and management decisions out loud

Viva scenarioStandard
Clinical prompt

β€œA 28-year-old chef presents 6 hours after cutting his right long finger with a sharp knife. He has lost active flexion at the DIP and PIP joints. Describe your management including surgical technique.”

Viva scenarioStandard
Clinical prompt

β€œYou are repairing a Zone 2 flexor tendon injury and intra-operatively the repair catches and triggers as it passes through the A2 pulley. What are the causes and how would you address this?”

Viva scenarioStandard
Clinical prompt

β€œA 35-year-old manual labourer had a Zone 2 flexor tendon repair 3 weeks ago with an early active motion protocol. He now has sudden loss of active DIP flexion after lifting a heavy box, with no active FDP function. Discuss your management options and their outcomes.”

Exam day cheat sheet
Flexor tendon repair Zone 2 β€” exam-day essentials

Indication

  • Acute complete FDP laceration in Zone 2 (less than 7–10 days); combined FDP and FDS; partial FDP greater than 50 percent of cross-section
  • Contraindicated with active infection (drain first), severe crush (staged), or a patient unable to comply with therapy
  • Favourable: sharp injury, single structure, young patient, index/long finger, early presentation

Key anatomy

  • Zone 2 = A1 pulley to FDS insertion = 'no man's land' β€” both tendons in a tight sheath with the critical pulleys, worst prognosis
  • A2 (proximal phalanx) is 50 percent of pulley force, A4 (middle phalanx) is 25 percent β€” together 75 percent; all C pulleys expendable
  • FDP inserts on the distal phalanx (the only DIP flexor β€” mandatory to repair); FDS splits at the chiasm of Camper to insert on the middle phalanx
  • Digital neurovascular bundles run 2–3 mm from the sheath edge β€” identify before opening the sheath

Critical steps

  • Bruner zigzag at 60 degrees to creases (never 90); apex at mid-axial line; full-thickness flaps
  • Open the sheath preserving A2 and A4 (at least 50 percent each), vent all C pulleys
  • Retrieve the proximal end (FDP retracts more than FDS β€” feeding-tube technique); minimal debridement to preserve length
  • 6-strand Adelaide core (60–80 N), 3-0/4-0 braided non-absorbable, locking, 7–10 mm purchase; running epitendinous 6-0 cross-stitch
  • Confirm smooth gliding (catching WILL trigger); loose sheath closure with vents
  • Dorsal blocking splint: wrist 20–30 degrees flexion, MCPs 70–80 degrees flexion, IP joints 0 degrees extension; early active motion day 3–5

Technique pearls

  • Repair strength hierarchy: 2-strand 30 N (inadequate), 4-strand 40–50 N (minimum for early active), 6-strand 60–80 N (preferred); need greater than 50 N
  • Epitendinous adds 10–50 percent strength and a smooth gliding surface β€” not optional
  • FDS: repair both (bulky), repair one/excise one (common compromise), excise both (least adhesion)
  • Combined injuries: repair bone first, then artery, then tendon, then nerve β€” worse prognosis (50–60 percent vs 75–85 percent)

Complications

  • Adhesions (15–25 percent need tenolysis) β€” most common; active ROM less than 50 percent of passive
  • Rupture (2–5 percent) β€” peak weeks 2–4; re-repair fails in 30–40 percent, prefer staged reconstruction (60–75 percent good)
  • PIP contracture (10–20 percent) β€” prevent with IP joints extended in the splint from day 0
  • Infection (1–3 percent) β€” Kanavel's signs; surgical emergency within 24 hours
  • CRPS (2–5 percent) β€” early motion reduces risk

Background & Evidence


Zone classification. Verdan's five-zone system divides the flexor system from distal fingertip to forearm; Zone 2 β€” the segment from the A1 pulley to the FDS insertion, nicknamed "no man's land" by Bunnell β€” is the hardest because both tendons and the critical pulleys coexist in a tight sheath.

Zone 1
Anatomy
FDS insertion (mid-middle phalanx) to FDP insertion (base of distal phalanx)
Significance and prognosis
FDP only (FDS already inserted); single-tendon repair, relatively simple
Zone 2
Anatomy
A1 pulley to FDS insertion β€” 'no man's land'
Significance and prognosis
Both FDP and FDS in a tight sheath with A2 and A4; worst prognosis, highest adhesion risk β€” the focus of this operation
Zone 3
Anatomy
Distal edge of the carpal tunnel to the A1 pulley (palm)
Significance and prognosis
Lumbricals originate from FDP here; more space, better prognosis; watch digital nerve branches
Zone 4
Anatomy
Within the carpal tunnel
Significance and prognosis
Eight FDP, four FDS and the median nerve; median nerve proximity complicates repair
Zone 5
Anatomy
Proximal to the carpal tunnel (distal forearm)
Significance and prognosis
Musculotendinous junction; median and ulnar nerve injuries common; ample space and the best prognosis
Flexor tendon zones
ZoneAnatomySignificance and prognosis
Zone 1FDS insertion (mid-middle phalanx) to FDP insertion (base of distal phalanx)FDP only (FDS already inserted); single-tendon repair, relatively simple
Zone 2A1 pulley to FDS insertion β€” 'no man's land'Both FDP and FDS in a tight sheath with A2 and A4; worst prognosis, highest adhesion risk β€” the focus of this operation
Zone 3Distal edge of the carpal tunnel to the A1 pulley (palm)Lumbricals originate from FDP here; more space, better prognosis; watch digital nerve branches
Zone 4Within the carpal tunnelEight FDP, four FDS and the median nerve; median nerve proximity complicates repair
Zone 5Proximal to the carpal tunnel (distal forearm)Musculotendinous junction; median and ulnar nerve injuries common; ample space and the best prognosis

Pulley anatomy and biomechanics. The flexor sheath has five annular pulleys (A1–A5) and three cruciate pulleys (C1–C3). The annular pulleys are the functionally important ones: A1 sits over the MCP joint (8–10 mm), A2 over the proximal half of the proximal phalanx (15–17 mm in index/long, 12–15 mm in ring/small), A3 over the PIP joint (3–5 mm), A4 over the middle third of the middle phalanx (7–9 mm), and A5 over the DIP joint (variable). The cruciate pulleys (C1 between A2 and A3, C2 between A3 and A4, C3 between A4 and A5) are thin and provide minimal force β€” all can be sacrificed. Biomechanically A2 provides about 50 percent of total pulley force, A4 about 25 percent (together 75 percent), and at least 1.2 cm of combined A2/A4 length is needed to prevent bowstringing. Classic teaching is to preserve at least 50 percent of both A2 and A4. Modern evidence (Tang, Pan, Lalonde) reframes this as case-specific venting judged by wide-awake intra-operative excursion testing β€” controlled venting of A2 and/or A4 is widely accepted provided the core is well tensioned and active gliding confirms no clinically significant bowstringing. FDS, FDP and the vincula in Zone 2. FDS inserts on the volar middle third of the middle phalanx, splitting into radial and ulnar slips that decussate around FDP at the chiasm of Camper; it provides PIP flexion and grip. FDP inserts on the volar base of the distal phalanx and is the only DIP flexor β€” it must be repaired; because all four FDP tendons share a common muscle belly, shortening one limits excursion of the others (the quadriga effect). Both tendons draw their blood supply from the vincula (vinculum longus and brevis, to FDP and FDS), delicate mesenteries entering the tendons dorsally within the sheath β€” which is why minimal sheath opening and gentle handling preserve vascularity and limit adhesions. Core suture strength governs the rehabilitation you can safely run. The strand count directly sets breaking strength and therefore how aggressively the tendon can be mobilised.

Modified Kessler, Bunnell
Strands
2
Strength
About 30 N
Role
Inadequate for early active motion β€” superseded
Cruciate (Strickland), double Kessler, Savage 4-strand
Strands
4
Strength
40–50 N
Role
Minimum for early active motion
Adelaide, Savage 6-strand, M-Tang
Strands
6
Strength
60–80 N
Role
Preferred β€” highest strength, most aggressive therapy tolerated
Core suture techniques by strength
TechniqueStrandsStrengthRole
Modified Kessler, Bunnell2About 30 NInadequate for early active motion β€” superseded
Cruciate (Strickland), double Kessler, Savage 4-strand440–50 NMinimum for early active motion
Adelaide, Savage 6-strand, M-Tang660–80 NPreferred β€” highest strength, most aggressive therapy tolerated

Key evidence. The multi-strand-plus-early-active-motion paradigm rests on Savage and Risitano's original six-strand series (1989; 81 percent excellent or good by Buck-Gramcko) and the canine biomechanical work of Winters et al (1998), which showed Savage and 8-strand repairs significantly stronger than Tajima/Kessler without sacrificing excursion. Lin et al (1988) quantified the epitendinous contribution β€” a running-locking peripheral suture was 1.68–3.77 times stronger than simple or Lembert running and gave better edge inversion and a smoother gliding surface. Pan et al (2019) reported 60 fingers with no ruptures and 87 percent good or excellent using a tensioned strong core with only three to four sparse peripheral stitches and pulley venting as needed β€” challenging the dogma that 50 percent of A2/A4 must always be preserved and that a full circumferential epitendinous suture is essential. The contemporary Tang and Lalonde review (2026) frames Zone 2 repair as a balance between strength and free gliding, with pulley venting judged by wide-awake excursion testing rather than a fixed percentage. On rehabilitation, the Cochrane review (2015) found early active motion reduces adhesions and improves total active motion at 6 and 12 months with a slightly higher rupture rate (around 4 percent versus 2 percent) β€” a worthwhile trade-off that requires a repair stronger than 50 N. Functional outcomes. With modern technique, 75–85 percent achieve good or excellent results by Strickland or Buck-Gramcko scoring (good equals total active motion greater than 50 percent of normal; excellent greater than 75 percent), with mean DASH scores around 10–15. The overall complication rate is 25–35 percent (most minor): adhesions requiring tenolysis 15–25 percent, rupture 2–5 percent, PIP contracture greater than 20 degrees 10–20 percent, triggering 5–10 percent, infection 1–3 percent, CRPS 2–5 percent, and a 20–30 percent rate of needing a secondary procedure.

References


Evidence

Flexor tendon repair using a 'six strand' method of repair and early active mobilisation

Level IV
Savage R, Risitano G β€’ Journal of Hand Surgery (British) (1989)
Key Findings:
  • Original description of the six-strand (Savage) core repair combined with immediate active mobilisation in a protective splint
  • 36 fingers treated β€” 63 percent of lacerations in Zone 2 and 27 percent in Zone 1
  • Buck-Gramcko assessment β€” 69 percent of Zone 2 fingers and 100 percent of Zone 1 fingers excellent or good; 81 percent excellent or good overall
Clinical implication: Established the multi-strand-plus-early-active-motion paradigm that underpins modern Zone 2 repair, showing that a stronger core construct permits early active flexion with good functional recovery.
Verify on PubMed (PMID 2621398)
Evidence

Zone 2 flexor tendon repairs using a tensioned strong core suture, sparse peripheral stitches and early active motion: results in 60 fingers

Level IV
Pan ZJ, Xu YF, Pan L, Chen J β€’ Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume) (2019)
Key Findings:
  • 60 FDP repairs with a tensioned 4- or 6-strand core and only three to four peripheral stitches; A2 or A4 pulleys vented as needed
  • No ruptures and 52 of 60 fingers (87 percent) good or excellent by Tang criteria at 8–33 months follow-up
  • A properly tensioned strong core requires only sparse peripheral stitches β€” a circumferential epitendinous suture is not always mandatory if the core is well tensioned
Clinical implication: Supports liberal pulley venting guided by intra-operative excursion and a well-tensioned multi-strand core; challenges the dogma that 50 percent of A2/A4 must always be preserved and that a full peripheral suture is essential.
Verify on PubMed (PMID 30732521)
Evidence

The effects of multiple-strand suture methods on the strength and excursion of repaired intrasynovial flexor tendons: a biomechanical study in dogs

Level V
Winters SC, Gelberman RH, Woo SL, et al β€’ Journal of Hand Surgery (American) (1998)
Key Findings:
  • In-vivo canine model comparing Kessler, Tajima, Savage and 8-strand repairs under controlled passive motion
  • Savage and 8-strand repairs were significantly stronger than the Tajima method at 3 and 6 weeks; 8-strand stronger than Savage at each interval
  • Suture method did not impair tendon excursion or joint rotation β€” higher strand count widened the safety margin for early loaded motion
Clinical implication: Provides the biomechanical rationale for choosing multi-strand (4- to 6-strand or more) core repairs to safely tolerate the loads of early active mobilisation.
Verify on PubMed (PMID 9523962)
Evidence

Biomechanical studies of running suture for flexor tendon repair in dogs

Level V
Lin GT, An KN, Amadio PC, Cooney WP β€’ Journal of Hand Surgery (American) (1988)
Key Findings:
  • Compared a running-locking peripheral (epitendinous) suture with simple circumferential and Lembert running sutures
  • The locking peripheral suture was 3.77 times and 1.68 times stronger and 1.73 times and 1.26 times stiffer than the simple and Lembert techniques respectively
  • A peripheral locking suture also improves tendon-edge inversion and creates a smoother gliding surface
Clinical implication: Quantifies the contribution of a locking epitendinous suture to overall repair strength and gap resistance, supporting its routine use to augment the core repair.
Verify on PubMed (PMID 3047207)

Evidence

Achieving balance in tendon repair

Level V
Tang JB, Lalonde D β€’ Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume) (2026)
Key Findings:
  • Contemporary review framing Zone 2 repair as a balance between mechanical strength and free tendon gliding
  • Pulley venting is a trade-off β€” too little risks catching/rupture, too much risks bowstringing; wide-awake excursion testing identifies the ideal venting length
  • Slight bulkiness with tendon ends in close contact is acceptable; partial-range early active flexion maintains glide without rupture
Clinical implication: Reframes the classic 'preserve 50 percent of A2/A4' rule as case-specific venting judged by intra-operative gliding, and endorses WALANT excursion testing as the modern standard for balancing security against bowstringing.
Verify on PubMed (PMID 41537406)
1. Strickland JW. Development of flexor tendon surgery: twenty-five years of progress. J Hand Surg Am. 2000;25(2):214-235. doi:10.1053/jhsu.2000.jhsu25a0214. PMID: 10722813 β€” Seminal review of flexor tendon repair evolution and the Strickland outcome criteria. 2. Tang JB. Clinical outcomes associated with flexor tendon repair. Hand Clin. 2005;21(2):199-210. doi:10.1016/j.hcl.2004.11.005 β€” Analysis of factors affecting outcomes and evidence-based techniques. 3. Savage R, Risitano G. Flexor tendon repair using a "six strand" method of repair and early active mobilisation. J Hand Surg Br. 1989;14(4):396-399. doi:10.1016/0266-7681_89_90154-x. PMID: 2621398 β€” Original 6-strand technique for early active motion (81 percent excellent/good, Buck-Gramcko). 4. Elliot D, Moiemen NS, Flemming AF, et al. The rupture rate of acute flexor tendon repairs mobilized by the controlled active motion regimen. J Hand Surg Br. 1994;19(5):607-612. doi:10.1016/0266-7681(94)90123-6 β€” Large series establishing a 4–5 percent rupture rate with early active motion and strong multi-strand repairs. 5. Winters SC, Gelberman RH, Woo SL, et al. The effects of multiple-strand suture methods on the strength and excursion of repaired intrasynovial flexor tendons: a biomechanical study in dogs. J Hand Surg Am. 1998;23(1):97-104. doi:10.1016/s0363-5023(98)80096-8. PMID: 9523962 β€” Savage and 8-strand repairs stronger than Tajima/Kessler without compromising excursion. 6. Lin GT, An KN, Amadio PC, Cooney WP. Biomechanical studies of running suture for flexor tendon repair in dogs. J Hand Surg Am. 1988;13(4):553-558. doi:10.1016/s0363-5023(88)80094-7. PMID: 3047207 β€” Running-locking peripheral suture 1.68 to 3.77 times stronger than simple/Lembert running sutures. 7. SilfverskiΓΆld KL, May EJ. Early active mobilization of tendon repairs: experimental study of the effect of early active mobilisation on tendon healing. Hand Clin. 1993;9(1):59-64 β€” Early active motion reduces adhesions versus immobilisation or passive protocols. 8. Pettengill KM. The evolution of early mobilization of the repaired flexor tendon. J Hand Ther. 2005;18(2):157-168. doi:10.1197/j.jht.2005.02.011 β€” Review of rehabilitation protocol evolution and the evidence for early active motion. 9. Lilly SI, Messer TM. Complications after treatment of flexor tendon injuries. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2006;14(7):387-396. doi:10.5435/00124635-200607000-00002 β€” Systematic review of adhesions, rupture and PIP contracture with evidence-based management. 10. Pan ZJ, Xu YF, Pan L, Chen J. Zone 2 flexor tendon repairs using a tensioned strong core suture, sparse peripheral stitches and early active motion: results in 60 fingers. J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2019;44(4):361-366. doi:10.1177/1753193419826493. PMID: 30732521 β€” 60 fingers, no ruptures and 87 percent good/excellent with a tensioned multi-strand core, sparse peripheral stitches and pulley venting as needed. 11. Tang JB, Lalonde D. Achieving balance in tendon repair. J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2026;51(6):669-676. doi:10.1177/17531934251388891. PMID: 41537406 β€” Contemporary review on balancing strength against gliding; pulley venting guided by wide-awake excursion testing. 12. Moriya K, Yoshizu T, Tsubokawa N, et al. Incidence of tenolysis and features of adhesions in the digital flexor tendons after multi-strand repair and early active motion. J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2019;44(4):354-360. doi:10.1177/1753193418809796. PMID: 30419758 β€” 148 fingers β€” only 5 percent required tenolysis after multi-strand repair with early active motion.

Editorially reviewed β€” transparent references and correction processPublished by OrthoVellum Medical Education TeamEditorial boardMethodologyReview policy
Educational disclosure

Educational content is reviewed for source visibility, editorial coherence, and correction readiness.

No individual clinician credential is claimed unless a named person is shown.

Verify before clinical use; this is not medical advice or a substitute for local guidance.

Procedure console
28
Read
0
Sections
advanced
Level
Peer-reviewed Β· 2026-06-20
Procedure info
Level
advanced
Read time
28
Updated
2026-06-20
SURGICAL APPROACHES USED
Bruner Volar Zigzag Approach to the Digit
Browse all procedures