Kienbock Disease — Surgical Management

Hand & WristAdvancedCore Procedure

Kienbock Disease — Surgical Management

Comprehensive operative guide for surgical management of Kienböck disease (lunate avascular necrosis) — radial shortening and capitate shortening osteotomies, revascularisation, intercarpal fusion, proximal row carpectomy, and total wrist arthroplasty or fusion, guided by Lichtman stage and ulnar variance

High-yield overview

Stage-directed surgical treatment of lunate avascular necrosis — joint levelling, revascularisation, intercarpal fusion, and salvage | advanced

Surgical Imaging

Radial shortening osteotomy for Kienbock disease
Radial shortening osteotomy with a volar plate — a joint-levelling procedure that offloads the lunate in Kienbock disease with negative ulnar variance.Credit: AI-generated medical illustration · OrthoVellum
Critical Decision Points and Exam Traps
Ulnar Variance Measurement

The trap: Measuring ulnar variance on a PA wrist radiograph taken in pronation or supination — ulnar variance shifts by up to 2 mm with forearm rotation.

The fix: Ulnar variance must be measured on a standardised PA wrist radiograph taken with the shoulder abducted 90 degrees, elbow flexed 90 degrees, and the forearm in neutral rotation. Compare with the contralateral side. A difference of 2 mm or greater is considered significant. Negative variance means the ulna is shorter than the radius at the DRUJ — this is the critical measurement that determines whether radial shortening is appropriate.

Lichtman Stage Drives Procedure Choice

The trap: Operating on a stage I patient with a salvage procedure (PRC or fusion) when joint-preserving options (joint levelling or revascularisation) are still appropriate.

The fix: Stage I (MRI signal change only, normal radiographs) and stage IIA (linear fracture, no collapse) are treated conservatively or with joint levelling/revascularisation. Stage IIIA (sclerosis without height loss) still accepts joint levelling. Only at stage IIIB (carpal collapse with fixed scaphoid rotation) does the algorithm branch to motion-sparing salvage (STT fusion or PRC). Stage IV (pancarpal arthritis) requires total wrist fusion or arthroplasty. Staging too aggressively leads to loss of motion that could have been preserved.

Excessive Radial Shortening and DRUJ Overload

The trap: Shortening the radius by more than the measured ulnar variance plus 2 mm — this overloads the DRUJ and causes ulnar-sided wrist pain, radioulnar impingement, and progressive DRUJ arthritis.

The fix: Calculate the exact amount of shortening preoperatively from the PA wrist film. The target shortening equals the ulnar variance (for a neutral wrist) or the ulnar variance minus 2 mm (for a slightly positive postoperative variance). Never shorten by more than 4 mm total. Intraoperatively confirm the achieved shortening with fluoroscopy before final plate fixation. If the DRUJ is already symptomatic or arthritic, radial shortening is contraindicated — use capitate shortening instead.

PRC Requires Intact Capitate Cartilage

The trap: Performing a proximal row carpectomy when the capitate head or the lunate fossa of the radius has chondrosis or degenerative change — the capitate-radius articulation will fail and the patient develops rapid postoperative arthritis.

The fix: MRI is mandatory before PRC. If the capitate head cartilage is intact on MRI (no marrow oedema, no subchondral cysts, no cartilage loss), PRC gives reliable outcomes. If capitate head wear is present, perform total wrist fusion or arthroplasty instead. An intraoperative arthroscopy or direct visual inspection of the capitate articular surface during the dorsal approach confirms the MRI finding — if chondrosis is seen, abandon PRC.

PIN Protection During Dorsal Approach

The trap: The posterior interosseous nerve (PIN) lies on the floor of the fourth extensor compartment (EDM tunnel) during the dorsal wrist approach. It can be inadvertently transected, crushed, or entrapped in hardware, causing a painful neuroma or loss of PIN-innervated extension (though this is clinically silent as the PIN is purely motor to EDM and EPL beyond the supinator).

The fix: Identify the PIN in the fourth extensor compartment as the dorsal retinaculum is elevated. It runs with the posterior interosseous artery on the dorsal capsule. Either protect it with a vessel loop and retract it, or perform a prophylactic PIN neurectomy at the level of the distal radius (which provides pain relief without detectable motor deficit). Never leave it as an unidentified structure crossing the operative field where it can be caught by plates or screws.

STT Fusion vs PRC — Wrong Choice for Stage IIIB

The trap: Choosing STT fusion for a patient whose primary complaint is pain at the radiocarpal joint rather than the midcarpal joint — STT fusion stabilises the proximal carpal row but does not address radiocarpal arthritis.

The fix: STT fusion (scaphotrapeziotrapezoid) and scaphocapitate fusion are indicated in Lichtman IIIB when the patient has isolated carpal collapse without radiocarpal arthritis. They preserve carpal height and some radiocarpal motion while eliminating midcarpal instability. PRC is preferred when the patient has midcarpal arthritis or when the surgeon wants a simpler procedure that avoids nonunion risk. The decision is nuanced: PRC gives more flexion-extension arc (approximately 100 degrees vs approximately 60 degrees for STT fusion) but loses carpal height; STT fusion preserves height but reduces radial deviation.

Mnemonic

V.A.R.I.A.N.C.EVARIANCE — Surgical Decision Framework

Mnemonic

L.I.C.H.T.M.A.NLICHTMAN — Staging and Treatment Algorithm

Surgical Indications

Indications by Lichtman Stage and Ulnar Variance

The surgical management of Kienböck disease is guided by two independent variables: the Lichtman radiographic stage (which reflects the degree of lunate collapse and carpal instability) and the ulnar variance (which determines which joint-levelling procedure is biomechanically appropriate).

I
Ulnar Negative
Observe; immobilise; consider radial shortening if progressive pain
Ulnar Neutral / Positive
Observe; immobilise; consider capitate shortening or core decompression if progressive
IIA
Ulnar Negative
Radial shortening osteotomy (2-4 mm)
Ulnar Neutral / Positive
Capitate shortening osteotomy or revascularisation
IIIA
Ulnar Negative
Radial shortening osteotomy (2-4 mm)
Ulnar Neutral / Positive
Capitate shortening, revascularisation, or core decompression
IIIB
Ulnar Negative
STT fusion, scaphocapitate fusion, or PRC
Ulnar Neutral / Positive
STT fusion, scaphocapitate fusion, or PRC
IV
Ulnar Negative
Total wrist fusion or arthroplasty
Ulnar Neutral / Positive
Total wrist fusion or arthroplasty

Absolute Indications for Surgery

  • Lichtman stage IIA or greater with persistent pain despite 3-6 months of conservative treatment (immobilisation, NSAIDs, activity modification)
  • Progressive lunate collapse on serial radiographs
  • Loss of carpal height or fixed scaphoid flexion (stage IIIB)
  • Pancarpal arthritis (stage IV)

Relative Indications

  • Stage I with persistent symptoms greater than 6 months despite immobilisation (some surgeons offer earlier joint levelling in manual labourers)
  • Bilateral Kienböck disease (surgical treatment of the more symptomatic side)
  • Patient preference for definitive surgical management over prolonged immobilisation

Contraindications to Specific Procedures

Radial shortening osteotomy:

  • Ulnar-neutral or positive variance (shortening the radius would worsen the imbalance)
  • Pre-existing DRUJ arthritis or instability
  • Active infection at the surgical site
  • Uncorrected smoking (significantly increases nonunion risk)

Proximal row carpectomy:

  • Capitate head chondrosis on MRI (PRC relies on capitate-radius articulation)
  • Radiocarpal arthritis (stage IV)
  • Active infection

STT or scaphocapitate fusion:

  • Midcarpal arthritis beyond the targeted fusion site
  • Advanced pancarpal arthritis (stage IV)
  • Poor bone quality precluding reliable fixation

Evidence for Conservative Treatment

Immobilisation and Observation

  • Stage I and early stage IIA disease may be managed with short-arm thumb spica cast or splint immobilisation for 4-12 weeks to reduce mechanical load on the lunate
  • Activity modification and avoidance of repetitive axial loading are recommended regardless of stage
  • NSAIDs provide symptomatic pain relief but do not alter disease progression
  • Approximately 20-30 percent of stage I patients improve with immobilisation alone; however, many progress to surgical intervention

Core Decompression

  • Percutaneous drilling of the lunate to stimulate revascularisation by creating vascular channels
  • Suitable for early stages (I-IIA) regardless of ulnar variance
  • Limited evidence base — small case series report symptom improvement in 60-80 percent of patients
  • Low morbidity; can be combined with other procedures

Evidence for Joint-Levelling Procedures

Radial Shortening Osteotomy

  • The most studied surgical procedure for Kienböck disease with the largest evidence base
  • Shortens the distal radius by 2-4 mm, effectively converting a ulnar-negative wrist to neutral or slightly positive variance
  • Offloads the lunate by redistributing axial load from the radial side of the wrist to the ulnar side
  • Multiple long-term series report pain relief in 70-90 percent of patients with Lichtman stages I-IIIA
  • Preserves wrist motion — most patients maintain 80-90 percent of preoperative range
  • Union rate greater than 95 percent with plate fixation in non-smokers
  • Key landmark study: Weiss et al. (1991) reported 94 percent good-to-excellent results with radial shortening in a series of 36 wrists with average 5-year follow-up

Capitate Shortening Osteotomy

  • Shortens the capitate by 2-3 mm, achieving the same lunate offloading effect as radial shortening but without altering the DRUJ relationship
  • Indicated when ulnar variance is neutral or positive (radial shortening would worsen DRUJ mechanics)
  • Fixation with an intramedullary headless compression screw (Acutrak or Herbert-type) or mini-fragment plate
  • Almquist (1982) described the original technique; subsequent series report 70-85 percent satisfactory results
  • Nonunion rate approximately 5-10 percent — higher than radial shortening because the capitate osteotomy site is smaller

Radial Shortening vs Capitate Shortening Osteotomy


Evidence for Revascularisation

Vascularised Bone Grafting

  • Pedicled or free vascularised bone grafts (most commonly the 4th and 5th extensor compartment artery-based grafts from the distal radius, or the medial femoral condyle free flap) are used to restore blood supply to the lunate
  • Most commonly combined with a joint-levelling procedure (radial shortening or capitate shortening) to simultaneously offload and revascularise the lunate
  • Indicated in stage IIA-IIIA with a viable (non-collapsed) lunate shape — revascularisation cannot restore a collapsed lunate architecture
  • The Iliac crest bone graft based on the vascularised pedicle was described by Hori (1979); more recent work uses the medial femoral condyle free flap with good structural support
  • Series report pain relief in 65-85 percent and radiographic evidence of revascularisation (restored MRI signal) in approximately 60-75 percent

Evidence for Motion-Sparing Salvage

Intercarpal Fusion (STT or Scaphocapitate)

  • STT fusion (scaphotrapeziotrapezoid) stabilises the proximal carpal row by preventing scaphoid flexion, which is the primary collapse pattern in Kienböck disease
  • Indicated at Lichtman stage IIIB when carpal height is reduced and the scaphoid has rotated into fixed flexion but pancarpal arthritis has not yet developed
  • Watson and Ryu (1986) described the technique; series report 70-85 percent good-to-excellent results
  • Nonunion rate approximately 5-15 percent — the most common complication; requires careful surface preparation and rigid fixation
  • Scaphocapitate fusion is an alternative that preserves more radial deviation than STT fusion

Proximal Row Carpectomy

  • Removes the entire proximal carpal row (scaphoid, lunate, triquetrum), allowing the capitate to articulate with the lunate fossa of the radius
  • Advantages: no nonunion risk (no fusion), simpler procedure, predictable pain relief, faster rehabilitation
  • Disadvantages: loss of carpal height, reduced grip strength (approximately 60-70 percent of contralateral), potential for capitate-radius arthritis over time (long-term follow-up shows radiographic arthritis in 15-25 percent of patients at 10 years, though many remain asymptomatic)
  • Contraindication: capitate head chondrosis or midcarpal arthritis — preoperative MRI is mandatory
  • Culp (2010) reported 85 percent good-to-excellent results in a series of PRCs for Kienböck disease at stage IIIB

Evidence for Total Wrist Salvage

Total Wrist Fusion

  • The gold standard salvage for Lichtman stage IV with pancarpal arthritis
  • Provides reliable pain relief in greater than 90 percent of patients
  • Eliminates wrist motion but restores grip strength to approximately 80-90 percent of the contralateral side
  • Plate-and-screw fixation (dorsal wrist fusion plate) is the most common technique
  • Union rate greater than 95 percent with modern plating systems

Total Wrist Arthroplasty

  • Motion-preserving alternative to fusion for low-demand patients with stage IV disease
  • Relatively newer implants (fourth-generation designs) have improved survival but long-term data remain limited
  • Contraindicated in high-demand manual labourers, active infection, or poor bone stock
  • Revision to fusion is possible but complex — arthroplasty is generally reserved for older or lower-demand patients

Clinical Decision Scenarios

Practise clinical reasoning and management decisions out loud

Viva scenarioAdvanced
Clinical prompt

A 32-year-old right-handed male carpenter presents with a 12-month history of insidious right wrist pain. He reports pain with heavy gripping and pushing. Examination reveals tenderness over the dorsum of the wrist, reduced grip strength, and pain on axial loading. PA radiograph in neutral rotation shows a sclerotic lunate with a linear fracture line, carpal height preserved, scapholunate angle 48 degrees, and ulnar variance minus 2 mm. MRI shows low T1 signal in the lunate with preserved lunate morphology. What is the diagnosis, stage, and surgical management?

Practical approach
This is Kienböck disease, Lichtman stage IIA, with negative ulnar variance of minus 2 mm. **Diagnosis**: The history of chronic dorsal wrist pain in a manual labourer, the sclerotic lunate with a linear fracture on radiographs (without carpal height loss or scaphoid rotation), and the low T1 MRI signal in the lunate confirm avascular necrosis. The preserved lunate morphology and absent carpal collapse place this at stage IIA. The minus 2 mm ulnar variance on a standardised PA wrist in neutral rotation is a critical finding that directs the surgical choice. **Surgical management**: Radial shortening osteotomy is the procedure of choice. The negative ulnar variance of minus 2 mm means the lunate is overloaded on the radial side of the wrist. By shortening the radius by approximately 2 mm (to achieve a neutral postoperative variance), axial load is redistributed to the ulnar side, offloading the lunate and allowing revascularisation. I would plan a dorsal approach to the distal radius, transverse osteotomy 2-3 cm proximal to the radiocarpal joint, remove a measured 2 mm sliver of bone, and fix with a 3.5 mm locking compression plate on the dorsal surface. **Why not capitate shortening**: Capitate shortening achieves similar offloading but is indicated when ulnar variance is neutral or positive. In this patient with negative variance, radial shortening is biomechanically correct and has a larger evidence base. **Why not revascularisation alone**: Revascularisation (vascularised bone graft) could be considered, but in a manual labourer with stage IIA disease and negative variance, joint levelling (radial shortening) has stronger evidence for pain relief and is a simpler single-stage procedure. A combined approach (radial shortening plus vascularised bone graft) is an option but adds complexity without clear evidence of superiority over radial shortening alone in this stage. **Post-operative plan**: Below-elbow cast for 4-6 weeks, then progressive wrist mobilisation. XR at 6 and 12 weeks to confirm union. Hand therapy from 6 weeks. Expected return to light carpentry at 10-12 weeks, full manual work at 12-16 weeks. Counsel that 10-20 percent of patients may ultimately require salvage (PRC or fusion) if progressive collapse occurs despite adequate offloading.
Viva scenarioAdvanced
Clinical prompt

A 45-year-old woman presents with long-standing right wrist pain. PA radiograph shows a collapsed and fragmented lunate, carpal height ratio 0.48, scapholunate angle 68 degrees, and mild narrowing of the radioscaphoid joint. Ulnar variance is neutral. MRI shows low T1 signal throughout the lunate with capitate head cartilage intact. What is the Lichtman stage and what are the surgical options?

Practical approach
This is Kienböck disease at Lichtman stage IIIB with carpal collapse and fixed scaphoid flexion, but without pancarpal arthritis (the radioscaphoid narrowing is mild and likely mechanical, not primary degenerative arthritis). **Staging**: The carpal height ratio of 0.48 (normal greater than 0.54) confirms carpal height loss. The scapholunate angle of 68 degrees (normal 30-60 degrees) confirms fixed scaphoid flexion rotation. The lunate is collapsed and fragmented. This is classic stage IIIB. The neutral ulnar variance means joint levelling (radial shortening) is not appropriate. **Surgical options at this stage**: **Option 1 — Proximal row carpectomy (PRC)**: This is my preferred option for this patient. The capitate head cartilage is intact on MRI, which is the mandatory prerequisite. PRC removes the entire proximal row (scaphoid, lunate, triquetrum) and allows the capitate to articulate with the lunate fossa of the radius. Advantages: no nonunion risk (no fusion), simpler procedure, faster rehabilitation, preserves approximately 60-70 percent of grip strength and a functional flexion-extension arc of approximately 50-60 degrees. The patient can expect reliable pain relief. **Option 2 — STT fusion**: This stabilises the carpal row by fusing the scaphoid to the trapezium and trapezoid, preventing further scaphoid flexion. It preserves carpal height but limits radial deviation to approximately 15-20 degrees (versus approximately 30 degrees normal). Nonunion risk is 5-15 percent. This is a reasonable alternative if the patient wants to preserve carpal height, but it is technically more demanding than PRC. **Option 3 — Scaphocapitate fusion**: An alternative to STT fusion that preserves more radial deviation. Limited evidence base compared to STT fusion. **Why not total wrist fusion**: Pancarpal arthritis is not present (only mild radioscaphoid narrowing, which is a mechanical consequence of the collapse pattern). Total wrist fusion eliminates all wrist motion and is not indicated until stage IV with established pancarpal arthritis. **My recommendation**: I would discuss PRC as the primary option, explaining that the capitate head cartilage is in good condition on MRI (which she has seen), that the procedure has a high success rate, and that it avoids the nonunion risk associated with fusion procedures. I would counsel that PRC provides a functional wrist with reduced but adequate range for most activities of daily living.
Viva scenarioAdvanced
Clinical prompt

A 28-year-old woman with Kienbock disease underwent a radial shortening osteotomy 18 months ago. The osteotomy united uneventfully. She now presents with worsening wrist pain, reduced grip, and stiffness. Radiographs show the lunate has collapsed further, the carpal height ratio is 0.50, and the scapholunate angle is 65 degrees. What is happening and what is the next step?

Practical approach
This represents progression of Kienböck disease despite a successfully united radial shortening osteotomy. The lunate has continued to collapse and the carpal row has lost height with scaphoid flexion — the patient has progressed from (presumably) Lichtman IIIA to stage IIIB despite adequate joint levelling. **Why has the osteotomy not prevented collapse?**: Radial shortening osteotomy offloads the lunate by redistributing load to the ulnar side, but it does not restore the lunate blood supply or reverse existing microstructural damage. In approximately 10-20 percent of cases, the lunate continues to collapse despite adequate joint levelling. Risk factors for progression include: advanced initial stage (IIIA at the time of osteotomy), ongoing heavy manual work, single-vessel lunate (Viegas Type I), and continued smoking. **Assessment**: I would obtain a current MRI to assess the lunate, the capitate head cartilage, and any radiocarpal or midcarpal arthritis. I would specifically look for: (1) degree of lunate collapse and fragmentation, (2) capitate head cartilage integrity, (3) any radioscaphoid or midcarpal narrowing or osteophyte formation. **Management depends on the current stage and MRI findings**: **If MRI shows intact capitate cartilage and no pancarpal arthritis**: Proceed to proximal row carpectomy (PRC). This is the most reliable salvage after failed joint levelling. The osteotomy plate can be removed at the same sitting if it is symptomatic, or left in situ if not prominent. **If MRI shows capitate head chondrosis or pancarpal arthritis**: Proceed to total wrist fusion. The patient is young (28 years) which makes arthroplasty less favourable due to expected implant longevity concerns. Total wrist fusion provides reliable pain relief and good grip strength at the cost of wrist motion. **Discussion with the patient**: I would explain that progression after a well-done joint-levelling procedure occurs in a minority of cases and that the next step is a salvage procedure. I would counsel that PRC is preferred if the capitate cartilage is intact, but that a proportion of patients ultimately require total wrist fusion. The functional outcome after PRC is generally good and most patients return to a reasonable level of daily and recreational activity.
Exam day cheat sheet
Kienbock Disease Surgical Management — Exam Day Summary

References

Evidence

Kienbock Disease: Recent Advances in Understanding and Management

Level IV
Lichtman DM, Pientka WF 2nd
Clinical implication: The current authoritative reference for Kienbock disease classification and management, incorporating 21st-century imaging and perfusion advances into the traditional Lichtman framework.
Source: J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2025;107(12):1389-1402
Evidence

Radial shortening for Kienbock disease

Level IV
Weiss AP, Weiland AJ, Moore JR
Clinical implication: The foundational evidence supporting radial shortening osteotomy as the most studied joint-levelling procedure for Kienbock disease in ulnar-negative wrists.
Source: J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1991;73(3):384-391
Evidence

Comparison of Long-Term Outcomes of Radial Osteotomy and Nonoperative Treatment for Kienbock Disease: A Systematic Review

Level I
Shin YH, Kim JK, Han M, Lee TK
Clinical implication: The best available comparative evidence supporting operative treatment (radial osteotomy) over nonoperative management for symptomatic Kienbock disease.
Source: J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2018;100(14):1231-1240
Evidence

Single-Cut Single-Screw Capitate-Shortening Osteotomy for Kienbock Disease

Level IV
Bain GI, Krishna SV, MacLean SBM, Agrawal P
Clinical implication: Capitate shortening osteotomy is the joint-levelling procedure of choice when ulnar variance is neutral or positive, providing lunate decompression without DRUJ compromise.
Source: J Wrist Surg. 2020;9(4):276-282
Evidence

Comparison of Long-term Outcomes between Nonoperative Treatment and Vascularized Bone Graft for Kienbock Disease: A Systematic Review and Single-Arm Meta-Analysis

Level I
Park JY, Kim JK, Shin YH
Clinical implication: Vascularized bone grafting combined with joint levelling provides the best chance of lunate revascularisation and symptom improvement in stages IIA-IIIA, particularly when performed before lunate collapse.
Source: Clin Orthop Surg. 2023;15(4):643-652
Evidence

Proximal row carpectomy for advanced Kienbock disease: average 10-year follow-up

Level IV
Croog AS, Stern PJ
Clinical implication: PRC is a reliable motion-sparing salvage for Kienbock disease at stage IIIB when the capitate cartilage is intact, providing predictable pain relief without the nonunion risk of intercarpal fusion.
Source: J Hand Surg Am. 2008;33(7):1122-1130
Evidence

Scaphotrapeziotrapezoid fusion: long-term follow-up study

Level IV
Minami A, Kato H, Suenaga N, Iwasaki N
Clinical implication: STT fusion is an effective motion-sparing salvage for Lichtman IIIB that preserves carpal height, making it suitable for patients who need to avoid the carpal height loss associated with PRC.
Source: J Orthop Sci. 2003;8(3):319-322
Editorially reviewed — transparent references and correction processPublished by OrthoVellum Medical Education TeamEditorial boardMethodologyReview policy
Educational disclosure

Educational content is reviewed for source visibility, editorial coherence, and correction readiness.

No individual clinician credential is claimed unless a named person is shown.

Verify before clinical use; this is not medical advice or a substitute for local guidance.