Latarjet / Coracoid Transfer for Anterior Shoulder Instability
Surgical technique guide for the Latarjet coracoid transfer procedure for anterior shoulder instability with significant glenoid bone loss β FRCS/FRACS exam preparation
Reviewed by OrthoVellum Editorial Team
Editorial maintenance, source checking, and correction workflow β’ Published by OrthoVellum Medical Education Team
Open deltopectoral approach β coracoid harvest and transfer to anterior glenoid via subscapularis split β advanced
Surgical Imaging



Critical Exam Pitfalls β Latarjet Procedure
Musculocutaneous Nerve Injury
Most common nerve injury in Latarjet (0.8β8%). Enters coracobrachialis 3β8 cm from coracoid tip (mean 5.4 cm). Risk during distal dissection and retraction of conjoint tendon.
Exam answer: Test elbow flexion and lateral forearm sensation postoperatively. Avoid retraction greater than 2β3 cm distal to coracoid. Always identify and protect nerve before releasing conjoint tendon distally.
Graft Positioning β Medial Placement Error
Most critical technical error. Graft placed medial to glenoid articular surface fails to extend the arc and causes recurrent instability despite healed bone.
Exam answer: Graft surface must be flush with glenoid face (0β1 mm lateral). Confirm with intraoperative fluoroscopy. Medially placed graft on postoperative CT = indication for revision.
Subscapularis Split Level
Incorrect split level disrupts the sling mechanism. The split is at the junction of the LOWER two-thirds and UPPER one-third of subscapularis β NOT at the midpoint.
Exam answer: The lower two-thirds of subscapularis remain intact forming the critical sling, tensioning in abduction-external rotation to block anterior humeral head translation.
Screw Position and Hardware Failure
Screws placed too close to glenoid articular surface cause chondral damage. Screws in proud position abrade humeral head articular cartilage (can accelerate glenohumeral arthritis).
Exam answer: Screws should be parallel and in the midline of the graft, 25β30 mm apart, with tips not penetrating posterior cortex of glenoid. Confirm on axillary view.
Graft Lysis at 5 Years
Graft resorption on CT occurs in 15β30% at 5 years. A common exam trap β students panic and recommend revision.
Exam answer: Graft lysis does NOT equal failure. Sling mechanism of conjoint tendon maintains stability independent of bony union. Only revise if patient has recurrent instability symptoms AND CT confirms poor graft position.
Revision Strategy After Failed Latarjet
Recurrence after Latarjet is the highest-stakes scenario. Causes: graft lysis + sling failure, medial graft placement, hardware failure, missed posterior instability.
Exam answer: CT quantify residual bone, MRI assess conjoint tendon. Options: revision Latarjet, distal tibial allograft (Eden-Hybinette), iliac crest autograft, or reverse shoulder arthroplasty for severe arthritis.
LATARJETLATARJET β Steps of the Procedure
Hook:Think: LATARJET = 'Looking At The Anteroinferior Rim, Just Engaging There' β every letter describes a step bringing the coracoid graft to the anterior glenoid rim.
GRAFTGRAFT β Complications of Latarjet
Hook:GRAFT complications are what can go wrong WITH the graft itself β from the bone, the nerve, the hardware, and the tissues around it.
Indications for Latarjet β When to Abandon Arthroscopic Bankart
Absolute Indications (strong evidence):
- Glenoid bone loss greater than 20β25% on 3D CT (best-fit circle method) β inverted pear morphology on plain radiograph is a clinical proxy
- Off-track Hill-Sachs lesion: Hill-Sachs interval wider than glenoid track (Di Giacomo glenoid track concept) even with bone loss less than 20%
- Failed arthroscopic Bankart with recurrent instability β especially with progressive bone loss
- ISIS score 6 or greater in a contact athlete β 70% predicted failure rate from arthroscopic Bankart justifies primary Latarjet
Strong Relative Indications:
- Bone loss 13.5β20% with high-demand contact athlete (rugby, football) or ISIS score 4β5
- Epilepsy with recurrent seizure-related dislocations β repeated re-dislocation risk mandates durable bone reconstruction
- Poor labral tissue quality (attenuation, absence, prior failed repair) β no tissue to repair arthroscopically
- Significant Hill-Sachs lesion (greater than 25% humeral head width) where remplissage would excessively limit external rotation
Instability Severity Index Score (ISIS) β Balg & Boileau: A 10-point pre-operative score (range 0β10). A score greater than 6 points predicts a 70% recurrence risk after arthroscopic Bankart repair, supporting primary Latarjet in these patients. Note the score caps at 10, not 11.
| ISIS Factor | Points |
|---|---|
| Age less than 20 years at surgery | 2 |
| Competitive sport | 2 |
| Contact or forced-overhead sport | 1 |
| Shoulder hyperlaxity | 1 |
| Hill-Sachs visible on AP radiograph in external rotation | 2 |
| Loss of inferior glenoid contour on AP radiograph | 2 |
| Total (0β10) | Score over 6 = consider Latarjet |
Latarjet vs Bankart vs Remplissage β Decision Algorithm
Procedure Selection for Anterior Shoulder Instability
Evidence Base
Burkhart and De Beer (2000, PMID 11027751) β landmark case series of 194 arthroscopic Bankart repairs establishing bone loss as the primary determinant of failure. Patients with significant bone defects (inverted-pear glenoid or engaging Hill-Sachs) had a 67% recurrence rate vs 4% without; contact athletes with bone deficits had 89% recurrence. Introduced the "inverted pear" and "engaging Hill-Sachs" concepts and recommended Latarjet for significant glenoid loss.
Balg and Boileau (2007, PMID 17998184) β derived and validated the Instability Severity Index Score (ISIS) in 131 patients. A pre-operative score greater than 6 points carried a 70% recurrence risk after arthroscopic Bankart, on which basis the authors recommended a Latarjet (Bristow-Latarjet) procedure instead. Changed worldwide practice toward primary bony stabilisation in high-risk patients. (Often cited as "Boileau 2005"; the validated 10-point score was published by Balg and Boileau in 2007.)
Yamamoto and Itoi (2007, PMID 17644006) β cadaveric study defining the glenoid track: the medial margin of the contact zone lies a mean 84% of the glenoid width medial to the rotator-cuff footprint. A Hill-Sachs lesion that extends medial to the track ("off-track") is at risk of engagement, providing the biomechanical basis for selecting bony augmentation in bipolar bone loss even with sub-critical glenoid defects.
Shah et al. (2012, PMID 22318222) β single-centre series of 48 Latarjet shoulders reporting early complications. Overall complication rate 25%: recurrent instability 8%, neurologic injury 10% (musculocutaneous, axillary and radial; most transient sensory neurapraxia resolving within 2 months), and superficial infection 6%. Highlights that the true early complication burden is higher than often quoted and must be included in consent.
Key Evidence β Verified
Traumatic glenohumeral bone defects and their relationship to failure of arthroscopic Bankart repairs: significance of the inverted-pear glenoid and the humeral engaging Hill-Sachs lesion
The instability severity index score. A simple pre-operative score to select patients for arthroscopic or open shoulder stabilisation
Contact between the glenoid and the humeral head in abduction, external rotation, and horizontal extension: a new concept of glenoid track
Short-term complications of the Latarjet procedure
Validation of the instability shoulder index score in a multicenter reliability study in 114 consecutive cases
Clinical Decision Scenarios
Use these scenarios to practise clinical reasoning and management decisions
Scenario 1 β Inverted Pear on Plain Film
"A 22-year-old male rugby player presents with his fourth anterior shoulder dislocation over 18 months. He plays competitive provincial rugby as a flanker. His plain AP radiograph of the shoulder in internal rotation shows the classic 'inverted pear' appearance of the glenoid. Describe your assessment and management."
Scenario 2 β Postoperative Hand Weakness
"You perform a Latarjet procedure on a 28-year-old male. On day 1 postoperatively he reports numbness and weakness in his index and middle fingers with weak elbow flexion on the right side. What nerve has been injured, why is this at risk in this procedure, and how do you manage this?"
Scenario 3 β Late Recurrent Instability With Graft Lysis
"A 32-year-old male presents 3 years after Latarjet procedure for recurrent anterior shoulder instability. CT scan shows near-complete graft lysis. He has had two more dislocation episodes in the past 6 months. What are your options?"
Latarjet / Coracoid Transfer β Exam Cheat Sheet
Clinical summary
References
-
Burkhart SS, De Beer JF (2000). Traumatic glenohumeral bone defects and their relationship to failure of arthroscopic Bankart repairs: significance of the inverted-pear glenoid and the humeral engaging Hill-Sachs lesion. Arthroscopy. PMID: 11027751. DOI: 10.1053/jars.2000.17715. Case series of 194 repairs. Introduced the inverted-pear and engaging Hill-Sachs concepts. 67% recurrence with bone defects vs 4% without; 89% in contact athletes with defects.
-
Balg F, Boileau P (2007). The instability severity index score: a simple pre-operative score to select patients for arthroscopic or open shoulder stabilisation. J Bone Joint Surg Br. PMID: 17998184. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.89B11.18962. ISIS derivation (n=131). Score over 6 = 70% recurrence risk after arthroscopic Bankart; authors recommend Bristow-Latarjet instead. (Frequently mis-cited as "Boileau 2005".)
-
Yamamoto N, Itoi E, Abe H, et al. (2007). Contact between the glenoid and the humeral head in abduction, external rotation, and horizontal extension: a new concept of glenoid track. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. PMID: 17644006. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2006.12.012. Cadaveric study defining the glenoid track (medial margin at 84% of glenoid width); basis of the on-track/off-track Hill-Sachs concept.
-
Shah AA, Butler RB, Romanowski J, et al. (2012). Short-term complications of the Latarjet procedure. J Bone Joint Surg Am. PMID: 22318222. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.J.01830. Case series of 48 shoulders. Overall complication rate 25%: recurrence 8%, neurologic injury 10% (mostly transient), superficial infection 6%.
-
Rouleau DM, HΓ©bert-Davies J, Djahangiri A, et al. (2013). Validation of the instability shoulder index score in a multicenter reliability study in 114 consecutive cases. Am J Sports Med. PMID: 23271004. DOI: 10.1177/0363546512470815. Multicentre study confirming ISIS interobserver reliability (ICC 0.933).
-
Latarjet M (1954). Treatment of recurrent dislocation of the shoulder. Lyon Chir. Original description of coracoid process transfer to the anterior glenoid rim for recurrent anterior shoulder dislocation. Foundation of all subsequent modifications of the procedure.