Skip to main content
OrthoVellumOrthopaedic Exam Prep
Pricing
About OrthoVellum
OrthoVellum
A living orthopaedic atlas

Exam-focused orthopaedic references, a question bank, viva practice, and spaced-repetition revision β€” with every clinical claim traceable to its source. Content is educational only and is not a substitute for local supervision, clinical judgement, or institutional policy.


Library

  • Clinical Topics
  • Blog
  • Exam Frequency Index
  • Site Updates
  • Content Methodology

Company

  • About Us
  • Authors & Disclosure
  • Editorial Team
  • Editorial Policy
  • Advertising Policy

Legal

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Medical Disclaimer
  • Copyright & DMCA

Support

  • Support OrthoVellum
  • Help Center
  • Contact
  • Accessibility
Evidence. Clarity. Practice.

Β© 2026 OrthoVellum. For educational purposes only.

Not medical advice. Verify clinically important information against current local guidance.

Meniscal Allograft Transplantation (MAT)

Operative SurgerySports Medicine
Sports MedicineAdvancedCore Procedure

Meniscal Allograft Transplantation (MAT)

Surgical technique guide for meniscal allograft transplantation in the symptomatic post-meniscectomy knee - indications, graft sizing, bone-plug versus soft-tissue fixation, arthroscopic-assisted implantation, concurrent procedures, outcomes and complications

Procedure console
25 min
Read
0
Sections
advanced
Level
Peer-reviewed Β· 2026-06-20
High-yield overview

Size-matched non-irradiated meniscal allograft for symptomatic meniscal deficiency Β· advanced

SportsSubspecialty
8 stepsOperative sequence
2 mmHorn placement tolerance
90 minTypical duration
Critical Must-Knows
  • Patient selection is the single most important determinant of outcome: young (typically less than 50 years), prior subtotal or total meniscectomy, persistent compartment pain, stable and well-aligned knee, chondral surfaces Outerbridge grade 2 or better. Advanced arthritis, uncorrected malalignment greater than 5 degrees, or instability are absolute contraindications.
  • Graft sizing is performed on calibrated AP and lateral radiographs or MRI using the Pollard method; the graft must be size-matched within 10 percent. Non-irradiated fresh-frozen or cryopreserved allografts are preferred because irradiation greater than 25 kGy significantly reduces biomechanical strength.
  • The medial meniscus uses a bone-bridge (slot) technique in most centres; the lateral meniscus uses separate anterior and posterior bone plugs. Peripheral capsular suturing with vertical mattress sutures every 5 mm (a minimum of 8 to 10 sutures) is mandatory to prevent extrusion.
  • Chondroprotection is supported by Level III-IV evidence showing slower progression of osteoarthritis than meniscectomy alone, but MAT does not reverse existing cartilage damage and outcomes deteriorate once Outerbridge grade 3-4 changes are present.

When & Why


Indication. Symptomatic meniscal deficiency β€” persistent ipsilateral compartment pain β€” in a patient who has had a subtotal or total meniscectomy, with a stable, well-aligned knee and minimal chondral wear (Outerbridge grade 2 or better), that has failed non-operative management. Done well, MAT reliably relieves post-meniscectomy pain and may slow the progression of osteoarthritis; in the wrong knee it fails early. The ideal candidate is young (typically less than 50 years, relative upper limit 55), symptomatic, with intact or reconstructed cruciates, neutral or correctable alignment, and chondral surfaces that are still preserved. Confirm each of these before listing the patient. Absolute contraindications β€” any one rules MAT out:

  • Advanced osteoarthritis β€” Outerbridge grade 3-4 diffuse change, or greater than 50 percent joint-space loss
  • Uncorrected malalignment β€” varus or valgus thrust greater than 5 degrees, or weight-bearing line deviation outside the central 40 to 60 percent of the plateau (a varus or valgus thrust greater than 5 degrees or weight-bearing line deviation greater than 50 percent requires a concurrent or staged osteotomy before or with MAT)
  • Active infection or inflammatory arthropathy
  • Obesity (BMI greater than 35) in most centres Relative contraindications β€” age greater than 55 years, smoking (raises failure risk), and the low-demand patient with realistic non-operative alternatives.
Mnemonic

MATCHMAT β€” indications checklist

M
Meniscal deficiency
After subtotal or total meniscectomy with persistent ipsilateral compartment pain
A
Alignment
Neutral or correctable to within 5 degrees; weight-bearing line through the central 40 to 60 percent
T
Tibial size match
Non-irradiated fresh-frozen or cryopreserved allograft within 10 percent of the plateau
C
Chondral surfaces
Outerbridge grade 2 or better; no more than focal grade 3 lesions
H
Healthy, stable knee
ACL and PCL intact or reconstructed; patient younger than 50 to 55 with realistic expectations

Concurrent procedures are the rule, not the exception. ACL reconstruction, high tibial osteotomy and cartilage repair are frequently performed at the same sitting and do not worsen MAT outcomes β€” provided the knee is rendered stable and aligned. Plan them together: an unstable or malaligned knee will extrude and destroy the graft. Setup. Supine with a leg holder or lateral post allowing full flexion and extension. A thigh tourniquet is applied but left uninflated unless a concurrent osteotomy is planned. General or spinal anaesthesia with a regional block for post-operative analgesia. Fluoroscopy must be available throughout β€” slot and tunnel position are confirmed on fluoro before the graft is seated.

The Operation


The goal: arthroscopically deliver a size-matched meniscal allograft into the deficient compartment, anchor its horns anatomically to within 2 mm of the native tibial footprints, and secure the periphery to the capsule so the graft cannot extrude. The medial meniscus is usually fixed with a single bone-bridge (slot); the lateral meniscus with separate anterior and posterior bone plugs. Soft-tissue-only fixation carries the highest extrusion rates and is largely abandoned.

Meniscal allograft transplantation
Meniscal allograft transplantation: a size-matched donor meniscus is secured into the joint.Credit: OrthoVellum surgical illustration
Medial β€” bone-bridge (slot)

One bone block bridges both horn insertions in a single 4 to 5 mm slot, keeping their relationship anatomical. The standard for medial MAT.

Lateral β€” separate bone plugs

Independent 6 to 7 mm plugs in each horn tunnel, tied over an anterior tibial bone bridge or button. Suits the looser lateral meniscus and the popliteal hiatus.

Soft-tissue only

Suture the horn attachments without bone. Simplest, but the highest extrusion rates β€” reserve for selected cases.

Operative sequence (medial MAT, bone-bridge)

Step 1Position, set up and prepare the graft
  • Supine, leg holder allowing full flexion and extension; tourniquet on the thigh, uninflated unless osteotomy is planned.
  • Thaw the allograft in sterile saline, trim it to the recipient size, and fashion the bone block or plugs for the planned technique. Pre-place sutures in both horns and the periphery so the graft is ready to pass before you open the joint.
Step 2Portals and diagnostic arthroscopy (the exposure)
  • Standard knee arthroscopy portals; enlarge the ipsilateral portal later for graft passage.
  • Run a full diagnostic arthroscopy and confirm the chondral status β€” if there is advanced Outerbridge grade 3-4 wear you should not transplant. This arthroscopic check is the final gate before committing the graft.
Step 3Prepare the meniscal bed and mark the horn footprints
  • Debride the meniscal remnant back to a stable 1 to 2 mm peripheral rim from anterior to posterior horn β€” the coronary ligament attachment that you will later suture to. Respect the popliteal hiatus on the lateral side.
  • Identify and mark the horn insertion sites, which are your anatomic landmarks: the medial posterior horn sits immediately anterior to the PCL tibial footprint on the downslope of the posterior medial plateau; the medial anterior horn sits 7 to 9 mm anterior to the medial tibial eminence. Laterally, the posterior horn is posterior to the lateral eminence and anterior to the popliteal hiatus, and the anterior horn is anterior to the lateral eminence.
Step 4Prepare the tibial slot under fluoroscopy (the key anatomic step)
  • Under fluoroscopic guidance, cut a 4 to 5 mm wide slot, 8 to 10 mm deep, perpendicular to the tibial plateau, running from the anterior to the posterior horn insertion with a burr, chisel and rasps.
  • The slot must land the posterior horn within 2 mm of its native footprint immediately anterior to the PCL β€” a slot even 3 mm too posterior seats the graft back and extrudes it. Confirm the position with a trial implant before touching the graft.
  • For a lateral MAT, drill separate 6 to 7 mm tunnels at each anatomic horn insertion instead of a bridge slot.
Step 5Introduce and seat the graft
  • Enlarge the ipsilateral portal and pass the bone-bridge graft through a delivery cannula or a pulling suture.
  • Seat the bone block fully into the slot under direct vision, seating the posterior horn first and anatomically. Only proceed when a trial places both horns within 2 mm of their footprints.
Step 6Fix the bone block
  • Secure the bone bridge with a 6.5 to 7.0 mm interference screw, or tie the horn sutures over an anterior tibial bone bridge or button.
  • Confirm fixation is solid by probing β€” the graft should not translate or lift.
Step 7Peripheral capsular suturing (the step that prevents extrusion)
  • Place vertical mattress sutures (2-0 non-absorbable) every 5 mm from posterior to anterior horn β€” a minimum of 8 to 10 sutures.
  • Use all-inside devices for the posterior third and inside-out or outside-in sutures for the middle and anterior thirds. Tie all sutures with the knee in extension.
Step 8Final assessment
  • Cycle the knee through its full range of motion and confirm there is no extrusion, catching or instability. Document the final meniscal position arthroscopically before closing.
Neurovascular structures at risk

The popliteal artery and vein lie only 1 to 2 cm posterior to the posterior horn insertions and are endangered by posterior-horn suturing and tunnel drilling β€” keep needles and drills anterior and under vision. On the medial side the saphenous nerve and its infrapatellar branch are at risk during inside-out suturing. The common peroneal nerve is shielded by the lateral head of gastrocnemius during lateral work but must still be respected.

Confirm the slot before you seat the graft

Always verify slot or tunnel position with fluoroscopy relative to the PCL footprint and tibial eminence before seating the graft. A medial slot placed even 3 mm too posterior makes the graft sit back and extrude. Place at least 10 peripheral vertical mattress sutures β€” fewer reliably leads to extrusion on post-operative MRI.

Non-anatomic horns fail

The meniscal horns must sit within 2 mm of their native insertion sites. Non-anatomic placement distorts hoop stresses, causes graft extrusion and brings early failure. If the trial does not sit anatomically, revise the slot or abort β€” do not suture a malpositioned graft into place.

Concurrent procedures do not compromise the graft

Simultaneous ACL reconstruction, high tibial osteotomy or cartilage repair does not increase MAT failure when the knee is left stable and aligned. Plan and stage them so the graft is implanted into a neutral, stable environment.

Aftercare & Complications


Rehabilitation | Phase | Timing | Weight-bearing and bracing | Therapy | |-------|--------|----------------------------|---------| | 1 | 0 to 6 weeks | Non- or toe-touch weight-bearing; brace locked in extension for 2 weeks then unlocked | Passive and active-assisted ROM from day 1, aiming for 90 degrees by week 4; quadriceps sets and straight-leg raises | | 2 | 6 to 12 weeks | Progressive to full weight-bearing by week 8 to 10 | Closed-chain strengthening and stationary cycling; full ROM by week 8 to 10 | | 3 | 3 to 6 months | Full weight-bearing | Proprioceptive training; sport-specific drills after 6 months if the graft is incorporated | Return to sport. Low-impact activities from 6 to 9 months; high-impact or pivoting sports are generally discouraged or delayed to 12 months and undertaken with caution. An MRI at 3 to 6 months assesses graft incorporation and extrusion. Outcomes. In appropriately selected patients, 70 to 85 percent gain meaningful pain relief and improved function at 5 to 10 years, with graft survival of roughly 70 to 80 percent at 10 years. The chondroprotective effect is real but not absolute β€” disease still progresses once grade 3-4 changes are established. Complications

Graft extrusion greater than 3 mm (10 to 25 percent on MRI)
Recognition
Coronal MRI at 3 to 6 months shows the meniscal body beyond the tibial margin
Prevention
Anatomic horn placement, minimum 8 to 10 vertical mattress sutures, secure bone fixation
Management
Minor extrusion observed; symptomatic extrusion may need revision suturing or arthroplasty
Graft tear or failure (10 to 20 percent at 5 years)
Recognition
New mechanical symptoms or pain; MRI shows a tear within the allograft
Prevention
Correct sizing, anatomic placement, protected weight-bearing
Management
Partial meniscectomy if small; revision MAT or arthroplasty if extensive
Incomplete peripheral healing (5 to 15 percent)
Recognition
Persistent pain or extrusion on MRI; second-look shows poor incorporation
Prevention
Meticulous suturing and rehab compliance
Management
Observe, or revision suturing if symptomatic
Infection (less than 1 percent)
Recognition
Erythema, swelling, raised inflammatory markers, positive cultures
Prevention
Sterile technique, prophylactic antibiotics, careful graft handling
Management
Irrigation and debridement, intravenous antibiotics; graft removal if deep
Progression of osteoarthritis
Recognition
Joint-space narrowing, osteophytes, increasing pain on serial films
Prevention
Select patients before advanced chondral wear
Management
Non-operative care; osteotomy if alignment allows; eventual arthroplasty
Complications β€” recognition, prevention, management
ComplicationRecognitionPreventionManagement
Graft extrusion greater than 3 mm (10 to 25 percent on MRI)Coronal MRI at 3 to 6 months shows the meniscal body beyond the tibial marginAnatomic horn placement, minimum 8 to 10 vertical mattress sutures, secure bone fixationMinor extrusion observed; symptomatic extrusion may need revision suturing or arthroplasty
Graft tear or failure (10 to 20 percent at 5 years)New mechanical symptoms or pain; MRI shows a tear within the allograftCorrect sizing, anatomic placement, protected weight-bearingPartial meniscectomy if small; revision MAT or arthroplasty if extensive
Incomplete peripheral healing (5 to 15 percent)Persistent pain or extrusion on MRI; second-look shows poor incorporationMeticulous suturing and rehab complianceObserve, or revision suturing if symptomatic
Infection (less than 1 percent)Erythema, swelling, raised inflammatory markers, positive culturesSterile technique, prophylactic antibiotics, careful graft handlingIrrigation and debridement, intravenous antibiotics; graft removal if deep
Progression of osteoarthritisJoint-space narrowing, osteophytes, increasing pain on serial filmsSelect patients before advanced chondral wearNon-operative care; osteotomy if alignment allows; eventual arthroplasty

Viva & Exam Focus


Mnemonic

SIZEPASSMAT β€” operative sequence

S
Size confirmation
Verify graft dimensions against pre-operative measurements before opening the package
I
Irrigate and debride
Clear the remnant to a 1 to 2 mm peripheral rim with stable edges
Z
Zone preparation
Create the tibial slot or plug tunnels under fluoroscopic guidance
E
Entry portal
Enlarge the anteromedial or anterolateral portal to accept the delivery cannula
P
Pass the graft
Introduce the bone block or plugs through the portal and seat anatomically
A
Anchor the horns
Fix the bone block with an interference screw or sutures over a bone bridge
S
Suture the periphery
Vertical mattress sutures every 5 mm from posterior to anterior horn
S
Stability check
Cycle the knee through full ROM and confirm no extrusion or catching

Danger zones and exam traps

Graft sizing error
The problem
A graft more than 10 percent over- or under-sized extrudes (too big) or under-covers (too small)
Prevention and fix
Calibrated radiographs or MRI with the Pollard method (medial width equals plateau width minus 8 percent, lateral minus 7 percent); confirm the match with the tissue bank before accepting
Non-anatomic horn placement
The problem
A bone block more than 2 mm from the native footprint alters meniscal excursion and hoop stresses
Prevention and fix
Know the footprints (posterior horn anterior to the PCL; anterior horn 7 to 9 mm anterior to the medial eminence); confirm slot position on fluoroscopy before seating
Inadequate peripheral repair
The problem
Fewer than 8 to 10 sutures, or all-inside devices alone, allows extrusion greater than 3 mm
Prevention and fix
Minimum 8 to 10 vertical mattress sutures at 5 mm intervals; all-inside posterior, inside-out or outside-in anterior
Uncorrected malalignment
The problem
Greater than 5 degrees varus or valgus, or weight-bearing line outside the central 40 to 60 percent, overloads the graft
Prevention and fix
Correct alignment with a high tibial or distal femoral osteotomy before or with MAT
Advanced chondral wear
The problem
Outerbridge grade 3-4 focal, or diffuse grade 2 changes, bring poor pain relief and rapid graft failure
Prevention and fix
Confirm chondral status on diagnostic arthroscopy or recent MRI cartilage sequences before listing
Graft extrusion on MRI
The problem
Greater than 3 mm displacement of the body beyond the tibial margin at 3 to 6 months correlates with poorer outcomes
Prevention and fix
Anatomic horn fixation, adequate peripheral suturing, secure bone fixation; observe minor extrusion, revise or convert if symptomatic
Danger zones β€” the problem and the fix
Danger zoneThe problemPrevention and fix
Graft sizing errorA graft more than 10 percent over- or under-sized extrudes (too big) or under-covers (too small)Calibrated radiographs or MRI with the Pollard method (medial width equals plateau width minus 8 percent, lateral minus 7 percent); confirm the match with the tissue bank before accepting
Non-anatomic horn placementA bone block more than 2 mm from the native footprint alters meniscal excursion and hoop stressesKnow the footprints (posterior horn anterior to the PCL; anterior horn 7 to 9 mm anterior to the medial eminence); confirm slot position on fluoroscopy before seating
Inadequate peripheral repairFewer than 8 to 10 sutures, or all-inside devices alone, allows extrusion greater than 3 mmMinimum 8 to 10 vertical mattress sutures at 5 mm intervals; all-inside posterior, inside-out or outside-in anterior
Uncorrected malalignmentGreater than 5 degrees varus or valgus, or weight-bearing line outside the central 40 to 60 percent, overloads the graftCorrect alignment with a high tibial or distal femoral osteotomy before or with MAT
Advanced chondral wearOuterbridge grade 3-4 focal, or diffuse grade 2 changes, bring poor pain relief and rapid graft failureConfirm chondral status on diagnostic arthroscopy or recent MRI cartilage sequences before listing
Graft extrusion on MRIGreater than 3 mm displacement of the body beyond the tibial margin at 3 to 6 months correlates with poorer outcomesAnatomic horn fixation, adequate peripheral suturing, secure bone fixation; observe minor extrusion, revise or convert if symptomatic

Clinical Decision Scenarios

Practise clinical reasoning and management decisions out loud

Viva scenarioAdvanced
Clinical prompt

β€œA 38-year-old man has persistent medial knee pain 18 months after subtotal medial meniscectomy. His ACL is stable, alignment neutral, and MRI shows Outerbridge grade 2 change on the medial femoral condyle with no meniscal tissue remaining. How do you evaluate him for meniscal allograft transplantation?”

Viva scenarioAdvanced
Clinical prompt

β€œDuring medial MAT you have seated the bone bridge but the posterior horn sits 4 mm too far posterior relative to the PCL footprint. What do you do?”

Viva scenarioAdvanced
Clinical prompt

β€œA 42-year-old woman is 9 months after lateral MAT and now has lateral pain and mechanical catching. MRI shows a radial tear in the mid-body of the allograft with 3.5 mm of extrusion. What are your options?”

Exam day cheat sheet
Meniscal Allograft Transplantation (MAT) β€” exam-day essentials

Indications

  • Young patient (less than 50 to 55) with symptomatic meniscal deficiency after subtotal or total meniscectomy
  • Stable knee (ACL and PCL intact or reconstructed) and neutral or correctable alignment (within 5 degrees)
  • Chondral surfaces Outerbridge grade 2 or better; advanced arthritis is an absolute contraindication
  • Size-matched non-irradiated fresh-frozen or cryopreserved allograft within 10 percent of the plateau

Graft sizing and preparation

  • Pollard method on calibrated AP film: coronal width equals plateau width minus 7 to 8 percent
  • MRI sizing is an alternative but must be calibrated; confirm dimensions with the tissue bank
  • Medial: bone-bridge (slot) preferred; Lateral: separate anterior and posterior bone plugs
  • Thaw in saline, fashion the block or plugs, pre-place horn and peripheral sutures

Critical surgical steps

  • Debride the remnant to a stable 1 to 2 mm peripheral rim
  • Create an anatomic tibial slot or tunnels under fluoroscopy; posterior horn within 2 mm of the PCL footprint
  • Seat the bone block or plugs fully; fix with an interference screw or sutures over a bone bridge
  • Place a minimum of 8 to 10 vertical mattress peripheral sutures every 5 mm (all-inside posterior, inside-out anterior)
  • Cycle the knee through full ROM and confirm no extrusion or catching before closure

Danger zones

  • Non-anatomic horn placement greater than 2 mm from the native footprint causes extrusion and failure
  • Fewer than 8 to 10 peripheral sutures allows extrusion greater than 3 mm
  • Popliteal vessels lie 1 to 2 cm posterior to the horn insertions; protect during drilling
  • Saphenous nerve at risk on the medial side during inside-out suturing

Complications

  • Graft extrusion greater than 3 mm: 10 to 25 percent; prevented by anatomic placement and adequate suturing
  • Graft tear or failure: 10 to 20 percent at 5 years; partial meniscectomy or revision MAT
  • Infection: less than 1 percent; graft removal if deep
  • OA progression: slower than meniscectomy alone but inevitable once grade 3-4 changes are present

Post-operative protocol

  • Protected (toe-touch) weight-bearing for 6 weeks; brace locked in extension initially
  • ROM: 90 degrees by week 4, full by week 8 to 10
  • Return to low-impact sport at 6 to 9 months; high-impact generally discouraged
  • MRI at 3 to 6 months to assess extrusion and incorporation

Outcomes and evidence

  • Pain relief and improved function in 70 to 85 percent at 5 to 10 years
  • Graft survival roughly 70 to 80 percent at 10 years
  • Chondroprotective effect supported by Level III-IV evidence but not absolute
  • Concurrent ACL reconstruction or osteotomy does not worsen outcomes when stability and alignment are restored

Background & Evidence


The problem MAT addresses. After a subtotal or total meniscectomy the knee loses the meniscus's hoop-stress distribution, shock absorption and joint conformity; compartment contact pressures rise and osteoarthritis accelerates β€” the post-meniscectomy syndrome. MAT is a salvage operation for the young, symptomatic, meniscus-deficient knee: it aims to relieve pain and slow, though not reverse, that degenerative trajectory. Chondroprotective effect. Level III-IV studies show slower radiographic progression of osteoarthritis after MAT than after meniscectomy alone, with the effect most pronounced when the graft is implanted before significant chondral wear develops. Once Outerbridge grade 3-4 change is established the benefit is largely lost, which is why patient selection is the dominant determinant of outcome.

Bone-bridge (slot)
Typical use
Medial meniscus (most centres)
Extrusion behaviour
Lower extrusion; preserves the anatomic relationship of both horns
Separate bone plugs
Typical use
Lateral meniscus
Extrusion behaviour
Lower extrusion; suits the popliteal hiatus and the looser lateral meniscus
Soft-tissue only
Typical use
Selected cases only
Extrusion behaviour
Highest extrusion rates; largely abandoned
Fixation techniques and extrusion
TechniqueTypical useExtrusion behaviour
Bone-bridge (slot)Medial meniscus (most centres)Lower extrusion; preserves the anatomic relationship of both horns
Separate bone plugsLateral meniscusLower extrusion; suits the popliteal hiatus and the looser lateral meniscus
Soft-tissue onlySelected cases onlyHighest extrusion rates; largely abandoned

Concurrent procedures. Simultaneous ACL reconstruction, high tibial osteotomy or cartilage repair does not increase MAT failure rates when the knee is rendered stable and aligned; staged procedures are reserved for complex deformity correction. Anatomic horn placement within 2 mm of the native footprint β€” shown to reduce extrusion on MRI β€” is the technical factor most consistently linked to graft survival.

References


Evidence

Twenty-six years of meniscal allograft transplantation: is it still experimental? A meta-analysis of 44 trials

Level III
Elattar M, Dhollander A, Verdonk R, Almqvist KF, Verdonk P β€’ Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2011;19(2):147-157 (2011)
Key Findings:
  • Meta-analysis of 44 studies including 1136 MAT procedures
  • Overall failure rate approximately 10 percent at a mean 4.5 years follow-up; 70 to 85 percent good or excellent clinical results
Clinical implication: MAT provides reliable pain relief and functional improvement in appropriately selected young patients with meniscal deficiency.
Verify on PubMed (PMID 21161170)
Evidence

Long-term Survivorship and Function of Meniscus Transplantation

Level III
Noyes FR, Barber-Westin SD β€’ Am J Sports Med 2016;44(9):2330-2338 (2016)
Key Findings:
  • Prospective cohort demonstrating 74 percent survival at 10 or more years with bone-plug fixation
  • Significant and sustained improvement in pain and function scores maintained at final follow-up
Clinical implication: Bone-plug fixation with meticulous peripheral suturing yields durable results at 10 years when selection criteria are met.
Verify on PubMed (PMID 27206692)
Evidence

Effect of sagittal allograft position on coronal extrusion in lateral meniscus allograft transplantation

Level III
Lee DH, Kim JM, Jeon JH, Cha EJ, Bin SI β€’ Arthroscopy 2015;31(2):266-274 (2015)
Key Findings:
  • MRI analysis demonstrating the importance of anatomic sagittal positioning on extrusion risk
  • Non-anatomic placement and inadequate peripheral repair significantly increase extrusion greater than 3 mm
Clinical implication: Meticulous anatomic horn positioning and peripheral suturing minimise extrusion and improve outcomes.
Verify on PubMed (PMID 25442648)
Evidence

International Meniscus Reconstruction Experts Forum (IMREF) 2015 Consensus Statement on the Practice of Meniscal Allograft Transplantation

Level V
Getgood A, LaPrade RF, Verdonk P, Gersoff W, Cole B, Spalding T, IMREF Group β€’ Am J Sports Med 2017;45(5):1195-1205 (2017)
Key Findings:
  • Expert consensus on indications, graft sizing, fixation techniques and rehabilitation
  • Emphasises mandatory alignment correction and anatomic horn fixation for optimal graft survival
Clinical implication: Concurrent ACL reconstruction is safe and does not compromise MAT results when alignment and stability are addressed.
Verify on PubMed (PMID 27562342)
Editorially reviewed β€” transparent references and correction processPublished by OrthoVellum Medical Education TeamEditorial boardMethodologyReview policy
Educational disclosure

Educational content is reviewed for source visibility, editorial coherence, and correction readiness.

No individual clinician credential is claimed unless a named person is shown.

Verify before clinical use; this is not medical advice or a substitute for local guidance.

Procedure console
25 min
Read
0
Sections
advanced
Level
Peer-reviewed Β· 2026-06-20
Procedure info
Level
advanced
Read time
25 min
Updated
2026-06-20
SURGICAL APPROACHES USED
Knee Arthroscopy Approach
Browse all procedures