Skip to main content
OrthoVellumOrthopaedic Exam Prep
Pricing
About OrthoVellum
OrthoVellum
A living orthopaedic atlas

Exam-focused orthopaedic references, a question bank, viva practice, and spaced-repetition revision β€” with every clinical claim traceable to its source. Content is educational only and is not a substitute for local supervision, clinical judgement, or institutional policy.


Library

  • Clinical Topics
  • Blog
  • Site Updates
  • Content Methodology

Company

  • About Us
  • Authors & Disclosure
  • Editorial Team
  • Editorial Policy
  • Advertising Policy

Legal

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Medical Disclaimer
  • Copyright & DMCA

Support

  • Support OrthoVellum
  • Help Center
  • Contact
  • Accessibility
Evidence. Clarity. Practice.

Β© 2026 OrthoVellum. For educational purposes only.

Not medical advice. Verify clinically important information against current local guidance.

Meniscal Repair - All-Inside and Inside-Out Techniques

Operative SurgerySports Medicine
Sports MedicineIntermediateCore Procedure

Meniscal Repair - All-Inside and Inside-Out Techniques

Surgical technique guide for Meniscal Repair - All-Inside and Inside-Out Techniques

Procedure console
18 minutes
Read
0
Sections
intermediate
Level
Peer-reviewed Β· 2026-06-20
High-yield overview

Arthroscopic repair via anterolateral viewing and anteromedial working portals; a posteromedial safety incision is added for inside-out medial repairs.

All-insidePreferred technique
80-90%Healing with ACL
1-5%Saphenous nerve injury (inside-out)
60 minDuration
Critical Must-Knows
  • Vascularity decides healing. Red-red zone (outer 3mm) heals 90-95%, red-white zone (3-5mm) heals 80-85% with ACL and 60-70% without, and the avascular white-white zone (inner, more than 5mm from the periphery) less than 40% without augmentation.
  • All-inside is now preferred for most repairs: no accessory incision, equivalent 80-90% healing with ACL, a faster procedure, and a lower nerve-injury risk than inside-out.
  • Concurrent ACL reconstruction is the single strongest predictor of healing, lifting rates from 60-70% isolated to 80-90% via blood and growth factors released from femoral and tibial tunnel drilling.
  • The saphenous nerve is injured in 1-5% of inside-out medial repairs despite a retractor. It descends 1-2cm posterior to the MCL with the great saphenous vein, and the resulting medial-leg numbness is usually permanent.
  • Meniscectomy increases OA risk 5-10 times at 10-20 years (contact pressure rises more than 50% medially and more than 200% laterally). Repair preserves the meniscus but needs a protected 4-6 month rehabilitation.

When & Why


Indication. A symptomatic, repairable meniscal tear in a patient who will comply with a protected 4-6 month rehabilitation β€” most often a vertical-longitudinal or bucket-handle tear in the vascular periphery of a young, active knee. The final decision is made intra-operatively at arthroscopy, because tissue quality and reducibility cannot be assessed on MRI alone. Repair versus meniscectomy. Repair preserves the meniscus and protects the joint: meniscectomy increases OA risk 5-10 times at 10-20 years (tibiofemoral contact pressure rises more than 50% medially and more than 200% laterally). The trade-off is a longer, restricted rehabilitation and a 10-20% failure risk β€” but a failed repair can still be converted to meniscectomy with outcomes similar to a primary meniscectomy, so attempting repair does not burn a bridge. What makes a tear repairable β€” assess four factors:

Zone (vascularity)

Red-red (outer 3mm) heals 90-95%; red-white (3-5mm) 80-85% with ACL; white-white (inner, more than 5mm) less than 40%. Look for bleeding from the tear edges.

Pattern

Vertical-longitudinal and bucket-handle tears are favourable (aligned with the circumferential collagen). Radial mid-substance and complex degenerative tears do not heal.

Acuity, length and age

Acute (less than 12 weeks), length greater than 10mm, and young (less than 40 years) heal best. Chronic, short or degenerative tears fare poorly.

Concomitant ACL

Concurrent ACL reconstruction is the single strongest predictor, lifting healing from 60-70% to 80-90%. Examine both menisci at every ACL (40-50% have tears).

Technique choice β€” all-inside versus inside-out. All-inside is the default for most tears; inside-out is reserved for the far posterior horn and revision:

Current usage
All-Inside
Most common (70-80% of repairs)
Inside-Out
Historical gold standard (20-25%)
Outside-In
Rarely used (~5%), anterior horn only
Surgical access
All-Inside
Standard portals only
Inside-Out
Portals plus 3-4cm posteromedial/lateral incision
Outside-In
Portals plus percutaneous needle entry
Fixation
All-Inside
Implantable devices (Fast-Fix, FiberStitch, Sequent, Omnispan)
Inside-Out
Cannulated needles with 2-0 Ethibond tied over capsule
Outside-In
Spinal needles with suture
Best tear location
All-Inside
Body and mid-posterior horn (within 10mm of PCL)
Inside-Out
Posterior horn incl. far posterior (best access)
Outside-In
Anterior horn only
Procedure time
All-Inside
30-40 minutes
Inside-Out
50-60 minutes
Outside-In
40-50 minutes
Neurovascular risk
All-Inside
Low, less than 1%
Inside-Out
Saphenous nerve 1-5% (medial)
Outside-In
Very low, less than 0.5%
Healing with ACL
All-Inside
80-90% at 2-5 years
Inside-Out
85-90% at 5-10 years (longest data)
Outside-In
70-80% in small series
Implant cost
All-Inside
High, 1500-4000 dollars per repair
Inside-Out
Low, less than 100 dollars
Outside-In
Low, less than 50 dollars
Implant complications
All-Inside
2-5% migration, prominence, chondral damage
Inside-Out
Minimal (suture only)
Outside-In
Minimal (knots may irritate)
Meniscal repair technique comparison
FeatureAll-InsideInside-OutOutside-In
Current usageMost common (70-80% of repairs)Historical gold standard (20-25%)Rarely used (~5%), anterior horn only
Surgical accessStandard portals onlyPortals plus 3-4cm posteromedial/lateral incisionPortals plus percutaneous needle entry
FixationImplantable devices (Fast-Fix, FiberStitch, Sequent, Omnispan)Cannulated needles with 2-0 Ethibond tied over capsuleSpinal needles with suture
Best tear locationBody and mid-posterior horn (within 10mm of PCL)Posterior horn incl. far posterior (best access)Anterior horn only
Procedure time30-40 minutes50-60 minutes40-50 minutes
Neurovascular riskLow, less than 1%Saphenous nerve 1-5% (medial)Very low, less than 0.5%
Healing with ACL80-90% at 2-5 years85-90% at 5-10 years (longest data)70-80% in small series
Implant costHigh, 1500-4000 dollars per repairLow, less than 100 dollarsLow, less than 50 dollars
Implant complications2-5% migration, prominence, chondral damageMinimal (suture only)Minimal (knots may irritate)

Contraindications. Absolute: white-white zone, degenerative complex tear, an unreducible tear, active infection. Relative: age greater than 50 with low demand, a chronic tear beyond 12 months with poor tissue, a radial mid-substance tear, a previous failed repair, or a patient unable to comply with the extended rehabilitation. Consent specifically for a 10-20% failure rate (which may need later meniscectomy), saphenous nerve injury in 1-5% with inside-out (permanent numbness), implant irritation in 2-5% with all-inside, infection, stiffness, and the 4-6 month protected rehabilitation. Setup. Supine with a lateral post or thigh-high leg holder so the knee can be flexed over the table edge for valgus or varus stress. General or regional anaesthesia, thigh tourniquet, prophylactic antibiotic. Establish the standard anterolateral viewing and anteromedial working portals.

The Operation


The goal is to preserve the meniscus by apposing vascular, abraded tear edges under stable fixation β€” choosing all-inside for most tears and inside-out only when access demands it. The exposure is the arthroscopic portal setup (and, for inside-out, the posteromedial safety incision), laid out as the first steps below.

Meniscal repair
Meniscal repair: vertical mattress sutures restore a peripheral meniscal tear.Credit: OrthoVellum surgical illustration

Operative sequence

Step 1Positioning & arthroscopic exposure (portals)
  • Supine with a lateral post or leg holder so the knee flexes over the table edge for valgus or varus stress; thigh tourniquet, prophylactic antibiotic, general or regional anaesthesia.
  • Establish the anterolateral viewing portal (just lateral to the patellar tendon at the joint line) and the anteromedial working portal (symmetric, medial to the tendon), plus an optional outflow (superolateral) portal. These two portals are the entire exposure for an all-inside repair.
  • For an inside-out medial repair, mark the MCL edge now so the posteromedial safety incision can be placed precisely (Step 5).
Step 2Diagnostic arthroscopy & repairability assessment
  • Run a systematic survey of every compartment. Probe the meniscus and assess zone (distance from the meniscocapsular junction; bleeding edges mark the red zone), pattern, length (greater than 10mm is needed for multiple fixation points), stability (displacement greater than 3mm on probing means unstable), tissue quality, and reducibility.
  • Confirm the ACL and look for associated tears β€” 40-50% of repairable tears occur with ACL injury, the medial posterior horn being the commonest pattern.
Step 3Tear preparation & debridement
  • Lightly debride only frankly frayed tissue with the shaver, preserving as much substance as possible β€” unlike meniscectomy, the aim here is minimal removal.
  • Rasp both tear edges and the peripheral capsule to create raw, bleeding surfaces. This is a critical, routine step: it brings vascularity and healing cells to the tear.
  • Reduce a displaced bucket-handle fragment anatomically using flexion or extension and varus or valgus stress. If it will not stay reduced, the tear is not repairable.
Step 4All-inside repair (preferred technique)
  • Insert the device (Fast-FIX, FiberStitch, Sequent, Omnispan) through the working portal, held perpendicular to the meniscal surface.
  • Deploy the first anchor on the capsular side, advance across the tear, then deploy the second anchor on the central side; the self-tensioning system compresses the tear.
  • Confirm both anchors lie OUTSIDE the capsule by switching portals to see the capsular footprint β€” an intra-articular anchor erodes cartilage and fails.
  • Place a device every 4-5mm along the tear (3-6 devices typically; a 15mm tear takes 3-4, a 25mm tear 5-6). Spacing wider than 5mm leaves gaps that fail.
  • Verify the tear edges are apposed with less than 1mm gap and that the repair resists probing.
Step 5Inside-out repair & the posteromedial safety incision
  • Make a 3-4cm vertical posteromedial incision exactly 1cm posterior to the palpable MCL at the joint line (mark the MCL edge first β€” more than 2cm posterior increases nerve risk).
  • Dissect carefully in the subcutaneous plane, identifying and protecting the great saphenous vein and saphenous nerve (they travel together 1-2cm posterior to the MCL); incise the deep fascia longitudinally and bluntly develop the plane to the capsule.
  • Place a curved blunt retractor (Army-Navy or meniscal repair retractor) between the capsule and the neurovascular bundle, and palpate it continuously during every needle pass.
  • Through the working portal, pass cannulated needles pre-loaded with 2-0 non-absorbable suture (Ethibond) from inside the joint through the meniscus (3-4mm from each edge) and out through the capsule so they exit over the retractor. Place 2-4 vertical mattress sutures at 4-5mm spacing and tie them over the capsule with the knee flexed 30-40 degrees.
Step 6Biological augmentation (selective)
  • Reserve augmentation for tears with poor baseline healing β€” white-white zone, chronic (more than 6 months) without ACL, or revision. It is not routine for standard red-zone tears with ACL.
  • Trephination (marrow venting): drill 2-3 small 1-2mm channels from the peripheral meniscus to subchondral bone to deliver marrow elements. Evidence is mixed, with possible improvement from around 40% to 60-70% healing.
  • Fibrin clot and PRP have limited evidence and are not used routinely.
Step 7Concurrent ACL reconstruction (common)
  • Perform the meniscal repair first, then the ACL reconstruction β€” visualisation is better with the ACL intact, and tunnel drilling releases blood and growth factors (BMPs, TGF-beta, PDGF) that enhance meniscal healing (60-70% to 80-90%).
  • Protect the fresh repair during graft passage and fixation, then re-check its stability.
Step 8Final verification
  • View from both portals: anchors or sutures on the capsular side (none intra-articular), tear edges apposed with less than 1mm gap, and anatomic reduction of any bucket-handle.
  • Probe-test stability (a sound repair resists moderate force), and move the knee through full extension to beyond 120 degrees flexion β€” the repair must not impinge or limit motion. Check for pulsatile bleeding.
Step 9Irrigation, closure & bracing
  • Copiously irrigate (2-3L saline) and inject 20ml of 0.25% bupivacaine with adrenaline intra-articularly and at the portals.
  • Close the posteromedial incision in layers (capsule, deep fascia, subcutis, skin) with haemostasis to avoid haematoma; close each portal with a single nylon suture. Apply a compression dressing and cryotherapy.
  • Bracing is individualised: a large posterior-horn tear gets a hinged brace limiting flexion to 0-90 degrees for 4-6 weeks; a smaller body or anterior-horn tear gets no brace or immediate full ROM.
Popliteal vessels β€” the catastrophic risk

The popliteal artery and vein lie about 1cm posterior to the capsule at the PCL level (the artery medial to the vein). Maintain knee flexion of 70-90 degrees during posterior-horn repair (this relaxes the posterior capsule and displaces the vessels), limit needle or device penetration to less than 10mm past the capsule, and direct needles horizontally β€” never posteriorly. If there is pulsatile bleeding or an expanding haematoma, do not withdraw an impaling instrument; leave it in place, call vascular surgery immediately, and prepare for open repair.

Saphenous nerve β€” the common injury

The saphenous nerve runs 1-2cm posterior to the MCL with the great saphenous vein. It is injured in 1-5% of inside-out medial repairs despite a retractor, producing permanent medial-leg numbness or dysaesthesia. Place the posteromedial incision exactly 1cm posterior to the MCL, keep the blunt retractor between capsule and nerve throughout, pass needles close to the capsule and horizontally, and prefer all-inside (less than 1% risk) wherever access allows.

All-inside β€” confirm the capsular anchor

The single most important check in all-inside repair is that the anchors deploy OUTSIDE the joint capsule on the meniscocapsular junction. Switch to the opposite portal to see the capsular footprint before completing deployment β€” an intra-articular anchor erodes cartilage, causes catching, and fails. Place a device every 4-5mm and leave less than 1mm gap between the tear edges.

Inside-out β€” only when all-inside cannot reach

Reserve inside-out for the far posterior horn (more than 10mm posterior to the PCL) where all-inside devices cannot reach, or for revision. Its advantages (precise fixation, the longest 5-15 year data, low suture cost) are real, but the 1-5% saphenous nerve injury rate and accessory-incision morbidity make all-inside the default for suitable tears. Lateral inside-out is rarely done because of the common peroneal nerve at the fibular neck.

Aftercare & Complications


Rehabilitation | Phase | Timing | Protection | Therapy | |-------|--------|------------|---------| | 1 | 0-2 weeks | WBAT with crutches; brace 0-90 degrees if a large posterior-horn tear | Quad sets, ankle pumps, SLR, prone hangs for full extension | | 2 | 2-6 weeks | Full weight-bearing; continue restriction if posterior-horn tear | Stationary cycling, closed-chain 0-60 degrees, pool work | | 3 | 6-12 weeks | No brace; full ROM restored | Single-leg work, proprioception, light sport-specific drills | | 4 | 3-6 months | Avoid deep flexion, squatting and pivoting until 4-6 months | Running at 3-4 months, agility, return-to-sport testing | Weight-bearing is allowed as tolerated from the start (meniscal stress comes mainly from flexion, not axial loading) and is full by about 2 weeks. ROM is individualised β€” traditional protocols restrict a large posterior-horn tear to 0-90 degrees for 4-6 weeks on biomechanical grounds, while modern unrestricted protocols report equivalent healing in RCTs. All patients avoid deep flexion, squatting and pivoting until 4-6 months. Most return to non-contact sport from 4 months and to full sport by 4-6 months (versus 6-12 weeks for meniscectomy), provided strength and hop testing are greater than 85% of the other side and there is no effusion. Overall 10-20% of repairs fail, most within the first year; a failed repair can still be managed with meniscectomy with outcomes similar to a primary meniscectomy, so attempting repair does not burn a bridge. Complications

Repair failure (10-20%; 10-15% with ACL, 20-30% without)
Recognition
Recurrent pain, catching, locking, effusion; 70-80% within the first year; joint-line tenderness, positive McMurray; MRI has a high false-positive rate
Prevention
Correct selection (vascular zone, vertical-longitudinal, acute, young, good tissue), fixation every 4-5mm with less than 1mm gap, rasped bleeding surfaces, concurrent ACL, protected rehab
Management
Confirm clinically and with MRI; trial non-operative care; revision repair (50-70% healing) or meniscectomy (similar outcome to primary meniscectomy)
Saphenous nerve injury (1-5% inside-out medial; less than 1% all-inside)
Recognition
Immediate medial-leg numbness, burning dysaesthesia, positive Tinel; usually permanent
Prevention
Incision 1cm posterior to MCL, blunt retractor, horizontal needles close to capsule, or all-inside
Management
Usually permanent; neuropathic medications (gabapentin, pregabalin, amitriptyline), desensitisation; exploration rarely helps
Implant complications (2-5%, all-inside)
Recognition
Pain, catching, effusion; palpable prominence; may migrate late
Prevention
Verify anchors outside capsule from the opposite portal, perpendicular deployment, ROM check before closing
Management
Arthroscopic removal if symptomatic; observe if an incidental finding
Infection (0.3-1%; septic arthritis or wound)
Recognition
Severe pain, effusion, warmth, fever; wound erythema or drainage; aspirate (WBC greater than 50,000)
Prevention
Prophylactic antibiotic, skin prep, copious irrigation, sterile technique
Management
Septic: urgent washout, remove infected hardware, IV then oral antibiotics to 6 weeks. Wound: oral antibiotics, drainage if abscess
Stiffness or arthrofibrosis (2-5%)
Recognition
Loss of flexion or extension, firm end-feel, pain at end range
Prevention
Emphasise full extension from day 1; individualise ROM; avoid over-restriction
Management
Early (less than 12 weeks): intensive therapy and possible MUA. Late: arthroscopic lysis of adhesions
Popliteal vessel injury (less than 0.1%)
Recognition
Pulsatile bleeding, expanding haematoma, loss of distal pulses, pale cool foot; compartment syndrome
Prevention
Knee flexion 70-90 degrees, depth less than 10mm past capsule, horizontal needles, blunt retractor
Management
Emergency β€” leave any impaling instrument, vascular surgery, open repair; fasciotomy if compartment syndrome
Persistent pain (5-10%)
Recognition
Pain beyond 4-6 months without a clear re-tear; MRI indeterminate
Prevention
Realistic counselling, address all pathology at index surgery, balanced rehab
Management
Systematic evaluation; activity modification, therapy, NSAIDs, diagnostic injection; arthroscopy if refractory
Meniscal repair complications β€” recognition, prevention, management
ComplicationRecognitionPreventionManagement
Repair failure (10-20%; 10-15% with ACL, 20-30% without)Recurrent pain, catching, locking, effusion; 70-80% within the first year; joint-line tenderness, positive McMurray; MRI has a high false-positive rateCorrect selection (vascular zone, vertical-longitudinal, acute, young, good tissue), fixation every 4-5mm with less than 1mm gap, rasped bleeding surfaces, concurrent ACL, protected rehabConfirm clinically and with MRI; trial non-operative care; revision repair (50-70% healing) or meniscectomy (similar outcome to primary meniscectomy)
Saphenous nerve injury (1-5% inside-out medial; less than 1% all-inside)Immediate medial-leg numbness, burning dysaesthesia, positive Tinel; usually permanentIncision 1cm posterior to MCL, blunt retractor, horizontal needles close to capsule, or all-insideUsually permanent; neuropathic medications (gabapentin, pregabalin, amitriptyline), desensitisation; exploration rarely helps
Implant complications (2-5%, all-inside)Pain, catching, effusion; palpable prominence; may migrate lateVerify anchors outside capsule from the opposite portal, perpendicular deployment, ROM check before closingArthroscopic removal if symptomatic; observe if an incidental finding
Infection (0.3-1%; septic arthritis or wound)Severe pain, effusion, warmth, fever; wound erythema or drainage; aspirate (WBC greater than 50,000)Prophylactic antibiotic, skin prep, copious irrigation, sterile techniqueSeptic: urgent washout, remove infected hardware, IV then oral antibiotics to 6 weeks. Wound: oral antibiotics, drainage if abscess
Stiffness or arthrofibrosis (2-5%)Loss of flexion or extension, firm end-feel, pain at end rangeEmphasise full extension from day 1; individualise ROM; avoid over-restrictionEarly (less than 12 weeks): intensive therapy and possible MUA. Late: arthroscopic lysis of adhesions
Popliteal vessel injury (less than 0.1%)Pulsatile bleeding, expanding haematoma, loss of distal pulses, pale cool foot; compartment syndromeKnee flexion 70-90 degrees, depth less than 10mm past capsule, horizontal needles, blunt retractorEmergency β€” leave any impaling instrument, vascular surgery, open repair; fasciotomy if compartment syndrome
Persistent pain (5-10%)Pain beyond 4-6 months without a clear re-tear; MRI indeterminateRealistic counselling, address all pathology at index surgery, balanced rehabSystematic evaluation; activity modification, therapy, NSAIDs, diagnostic injection; arthroscopy if refractory

Viva & Exam Focus


Mnemonic

REPAIRREPAIR β€” when a meniscal tear is worth repairing

R
Red-red or red-white zone
Vascular outer 3-5mm with bleeding edges
E
Early or acute injury
Less than 12 weeks, fresh tissue
P
Pattern suitable
Vertical-longitudinal or bucket-handle
A
ACL reconstruction concurrent
Lifts healing to 80-90%
I
Individual, young and active
Less than 40 years, motivated
R
Reducible tear
Anatomy can be restored
Mnemonic

DANGERSDANGERS β€” neurovascular structures at risk

D
Deep popliteal vessels
About 1cm posterior to the capsule at the PCL level
A
Artery and vein
Catastrophic if pierced during posterior-horn repair
N
Nerve, saphenous
1-2cm posterior to the MCL; 1-5% injury in inside-out
G
Great saphenous vein
Travels with the saphenous nerve posteromedially
E
Extensor-side common peroneal nerve
Wraps the fibular neck; foot drop if injured
R
Retractor mandatory
Protects inside-out but is not foolproof
S
Superficial peroneal nerve
At risk with a too-distal lateral portal

Clinical Decision Scenarios

Practise clinical reasoning and management decisions out loud

Viva scenarioStandard
Clinical prompt

β€œA 28-year-old competitive footballer presents with a 6-week history of medial knee pain and catching after a twisting injury. MRI shows an 18mm vertical-longitudinal tear of the medial meniscus posterior horn in the red-white zone with a concurrent ACL tear. How would you manage this? Discuss your surgical approach and technique.”

Viva scenarioStandard
Clinical prompt

β€œCompare all-inside and inside-out meniscal repair techniques. What are the indications, advantages, disadvantages and outcomes of each? Which do you prefer and why?”

Viva scenarioStandard
Clinical prompt

β€œWhat are the neurovascular dangers of meniscal repair and how do you protect against them? Describe the relevant anatomy, injury rates, recognition and management.”

Exam day cheat sheet
Meniscal repair β€” exam-day essentials

Indications

  • Red-red zone (outer 3mm, 90-95% healing) or red-white zone (3-5mm, 80-85% with ACL); assess vascularity by bleeding edges and distance from the periphery
  • Vertical-longitudinal or bucket-handle pattern (aligned with collagen); not radial mid-substance (less than 40%) or complex degenerative
  • Length greater than 10mm (fixation every 4-5mm); acute (less than 12 weeks); young (less than 40 years); good reducible tissue
  • Concurrent ACL reconstruction lifts healing from 60-70% to 80-90%; examine both menisci at every ACL (40-50% have tears)
  • Contraindications: white-white zone, degenerative complex, unreducible, radial mid-substance, elderly low-demand, active infection

Exposure & danger zones

  • Portals: anterolateral viewing and anteromedial working β€” the entire exposure for all-inside
  • Saphenous nerve: 1-2cm posterior to the MCL with the great saphenous vein; 1-5% injury in inside-out medial (permanent numbness)
  • Popliteal vessels: about 1cm posterior to the capsule at the PCL level; rare (less than 0.1%) but catastrophic; protect with knee flexion 70-90 degrees and depth less than 10mm
  • Common peroneal nerve: fibular neck, 2-3cm distal to the joint line laterally; foot drop if injured; avoid lateral inside-out
  • Biomechanics: meniscus transmits 50-70% of contact force; meniscectomy raises pressure more than 50% medially and more than 200% laterally (OA risk 5-10 times)

The operation (key steps)

  • Diagnostic arthroscopy: assess zone, pattern, length (greater than 10mm), stability (displacement greater than 3mm), tissue quality, reducibility
  • Prepare: rasp both edges and the peripheral capsule for bleeding; minimal debridement (preserve substance); reduce a bucket-handle anatomically
  • All-inside (preferred): device perpendicular, anchors both sides, every 4-5mm, verify anchors OUTSIDE capsule from the opposite portal, gap less than 1mm
  • Inside-out (far posterior, more than 10mm from PCL, or revision): posteromedial incision 1cm posterior to MCL, blunt retractor, 2-0 Ethibond every 4-5mm tied over capsule, 1-5% nerve risk
  • Verify from both portals; repair first then ACL; irrigate 2-3L, marcaine, layered closure, individualised brace

Technique comparison

  • All-inside (70-80%): no incision, nerve risk less than 1%, 30-40 minutes, 80-90% healing with ACL; cost 1500-4000 dollars, implant complications 2-5%
  • Inside-out (20-25%): excellent posterior access, longest data (85-90% at 5-15 years), low cost; nerve injury 1-5%, incision morbidity, 50-60 minutes
  • Select by tear location, surgeon experience and setting; outcomes equivalent for suitable tears

Complications

  • Repair failure 10-20% (10-15% with ACL, 20-30% without); 70-80% within the first year; revision repair 50-70% or meniscectomy
  • Saphenous nerve 1-5% inside-out medial (permanent); implant complications 2-5% all-inside; popliteal vessel less than 0.1% (catastrophic); infection 0.3-1%; stiffness 2-5%; persistent pain 5-10%

Rehabilitation

  • WBAT, full weight-bearing by 2 weeks; ROM individualised (0-90 degrees for 4-6 weeks for a large posterior-horn tear, full ROM for smaller tears)
  • All patients avoid deep flexion and squatting until 4-6 months; return to sport from 4-6 months with strength and hop testing greater than 85%
  • Extended rehab (4-6 months versus 6-12 weeks for meniscectomy) is the trade-off for meniscal preservation and reduced OA risk

Background & Evidence


Epidemiology and why repair matters. Meniscal injury is among the commonest knee problems in active adults, and meniscal preservation is now first-line whenever a tear is repairable β€” the 2019 ESSKA consensus states that long-term clinical and radiological outcomes are worse after partial meniscectomy than after repair. The meniscus transmits 50-70% of the knee's contact load; removing it raises tibiofemoral contact pressure by more than 50% medially and more than 200% laterally, driving a 5-10 fold increase in OA at 10-20 years. Lateral meniscectomy is biomechanically worse than medial. Vascularity and the vascular zones. Only the vascular periphery of the meniscus reliably heals. Arnoczky and Warren mapped a perimeniscal capillary plexus (from the medial, lateral and middle genicular arteries) that penetrates only the peripheral 10-25% of the meniscus β€” the anatomic basis for the zones β€” and identified the popliteal hiatus as a relatively avascular watershed. This is the classification that drives repair selection:

Red-red
Distance from periphery
Outer 0-3mm
Blood supply
Perimeniscal capillary plexus
Healing rate
90-95%
Red-white
Distance from periphery
3-5mm
Blood supply
Partial capillary penetration
Healing rate
80-85% with ACL, 60-70% without
White-white
Distance from periphery
Inner, more than 5mm
Blood supply
Avascular (synovial diffusion)
Healing rate
Less than 40%
Meniscal vascularity zones and healing potential
ZoneDistance from peripheryBlood supplyHealing rate
Red-redOuter 0-3mmPerimeniscal capillary plexus90-95%
Red-white3-5mmPartial capillary penetration80-85% with ACL, 60-70% without
White-whiteInner, more than 5mmAvascular (synovial diffusion)Less than 40%

Tear patterns and healing biology. Vertical-longitudinal and bucket-handle tears (aligned with the circumferential collagen) heal best (80-90%); radial mid-substance and complex degenerative tears (perpendicular to collagen, or macerated) do not (less than 40%) and are managed by meniscectomy. Healing unfolds over 3-6 months β€” an inflammatory phase (0-4 weeks), a proliferative phase (4-12 weeks) and a remodelling phase (3-6 months), with full maturation by 6-12 months; a repaired meniscus regains about 60-80% of native strength by 6 months. Most failures (70-80%) occur within the first year. The ACL effect. Concurrent ACL reconstruction is the single strongest predictor of healing, lifting rates from 60-70% isolated to 80-90%. Blood and growth factors (BMPs, TGF-beta, PDGF) released from femoral and tibial tunnel drilling reach the tear via haemarthrosis and synovial circulation. About 40-50% of ACL injuries have an associated meniscal tear (the medial posterior horn is commonest), which is why both menisci are examined at every ACL reconstruction. Key evidence. The 2019 ESSKA consensus frames meniscal management around preservation and does not support routine biologic augmentation. Grant's systematic review of isolated tears found equivalent clinical failure (17% inside-out versus 19% all-inside), with nerve irritation far higher inside-out (9% versus 2%). The MOON 6-year cohort (Westermann) reported a 14% failure rate for repair-with-ACL with sustained function. Nepple's meta-analysis set realistic long-term expectations β€” about one in four repairs fails by 5 years, but most endure, and the failure rate was similar across medial and lateral and ACL-intact versus ACL-reconstructed subgroups. Arnoczky and Warren's foundational cadaver study mapped the perimeniscal capillary plexus to the peripheral 10-25%, the anatomic basis for the vascular zones.

References


Evidence

Management of traumatic meniscus tears: the 2019 ESSKA meniscus consensus

Guideline
Kopf S, Beaufils P, Hirschmann MT, et al. β€’ Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc (2020)
Key Findings:
  • Formal European consensus (8-surgeon steering group, 19-d surgeon rating group, peer review by ESSKA-affiliated national societies); 27 question-answer sets graded A to D by level of evidence
  • Meniscus preservation should be the FIRST-LINE treatment whenever possible - clinical and radiological long-term outcomes are worse after partial meniscectomy than after repair
  • When repair is indicated, surgery should be performed as early as possible; many tears previously considered irreparable (older tears, tears in obese patients, long tears) should now be repaired
  • Stable, in-situ lateral meniscus tears left alone show a better prognosis than medial tears; routine biological enhancement (needling, PRP) was NOT shown to improve healing
Clinical implication: The leading European society guideline reframes meniscal management globally around preservation, expands the indications for repair, and does not support routine biologic augmentation - directly supporting a low threshold for repair over meniscectomy.
Verify on PubMed (PMID 32052121)
Evidence

Comparison of inside-out and all-inside techniques for the repair of isolated meniscal tears: a systematic review

2a
Grant JA, Wilde J, Miller BS, Bedi A β€’ Am J Sports Med (2011)
Key Findings:
  • Systematic review of 19 studies with data specific to isolated meniscal tears in stable knees (controlling for the confounding effect of concurrent ACL reconstruction)
  • No difference in clinical failure rate: 17% inside-out versus 19% all-inside; Lysholm (87.8 vs 90.2) and Tegner (5.6 vs 5.5) scores comparable
  • Nerve injury or irritation markedly higher with inside-out (9%) than all-inside (2%); all-inside carried more soft-tissue irritation and implant migration or breakage, with chondral injury linked to older rigid implants
  • Healing differences appear driven more by tear pattern and concurrent ACL reconstruction than by inside-out versus all-inside approach
Clinical implication: Supports the modern position that all-inside and inside-out achieve equivalent structural healing for suitable tears, with technique choice driven by complication profile (nerve injury favouring all-inside, implant cost and complications favouring inside-out) and tear access.
Verify on PubMed (PMID 21737837)
Evidence

Meniscal repair with concurrent anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: operative success and patient outcomes at 6-year follow-up

2b
Westermann RW, Wright RW, Spindler KP, Huston LJ, Wolf BR β€’ Am J Sports Med (2014)
Key Findings:
  • Prospective multicentre cohort (MOON group): 235 of 286 patients (298 meniscal repairs) followed to 6 years after combined repair plus ACL reconstruction
  • Overall meniscal repair failure rate 14% at 6 years; repaired tears were typically peripheral (84%), longitudinal (84%) or displaced bucket-handle (10%), mean length 16.5mm
  • Medial repairs failed earlier than lateral repairs (mean 2.1 versus 3.7 years); suture number and type did not differ between failures and successes
  • Patient-reported outcome improvements were sustained at 6 years, supporting durable benefit of repair performed with ACL reconstruction
Clinical implication: High-quality real-world evidence that meniscal repair combined with ACL reconstruction has a low (~14%) mid-term failure rate with sustained functional gains, justifying an aggressive repair-preservation strategy during ACL surgery.
Verify on PubMed (PMID 25023440)
Evidence

Meniscal repair outcomes at greater than five years: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis

2a
Nepple JJ, Dunn WR, Wright RW β€’ J Bone Joint Surg Am (2012)
Key Findings:
  • Meta-analysis of 13 studies reporting minimum 5-year outcomes (566 repairs), addressing the durability of repair beyond the early post-operative period
  • Pooled meniscal repair failure rate 23.1% (131 of 566) at greater than 5 years, i.e. roughly three-quarters of repairs remained intact long-term
  • Failure rate was similar for medial and lateral menisci and for ACL-intact versus ACL-reconstructed knees in this long-term pooled analysis (20.2% to 24.3% across subgroups)
  • Long-term outcomes for modern all-inside devices were not yet established at the time of review, highlighting a durability evidence gap
Clinical implication: Sets realistic long-term expectations: about one in four repairs fails by 5 or more years, but most endure - reinforcing patient counselling that attempting repair preserves meniscus without precluding later meniscectomy.
Verify on PubMed (PMID 23318612)
Evidence

Microvasculature of the human meniscus

LoE 3
Arnoczky SP, Warren RF β€’ Am J Sports Med (1982)
Key Findings:
  • Anatomical study of 20 cadaver knees using histology and Spalteholz tissue-clearing to map meniscal blood supply
  • Menisci are supplied by the medial, lateral and middle genicular arteries via a perimeniscal capillary plexus arising from capsular and synovial tissue
  • The capillary plexus penetrates only the peripheral 10-25% of the meniscus - the anatomical basis for the red-red, red-white and avascular white-white zones
  • The posterolateral lateral meniscus adjacent to the popliteal tendon (popliteal hiatus) is devoid of penetrating peripheral vessels
Clinical implication: The foundational vascular-zone paper underpinning repair selection: only peripheral (vascularised) tears reliably heal, the popliteal hiatus is a relatively avascular watershed, and central white-white tears are poor repair candidates without augmentation.
Verify on PubMed (PMID 7081532)
Evidence

Surgical management of degenerative meniscus lesions: the 2016 ESSKA meniscus consensus

Beaufils P, Becker R, Kopf S, et al. β€’ Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc (2017)

European consensus on degenerative meniscal lesions, recommending conservative first-line treatment and a limited role for arthroscopic partial meniscectomy in the degenerative knee.

Evidence

Meniscal repair versus partial meniscectomy: a systematic review comparing reoperation rates and clinical outcomes

Paxton ES, Stock MV, Brophy RH β€’ Arthroscopy (2011)

Systematic review comparing meniscal repair with partial meniscectomy: repair carries a higher reoperation rate but better long-term joint preservation.

Evidence

Amount of meniscal resection after failed meniscal repair

Pujol N, Barbier O, Boisrenoult P, Beaufils P β€’ Am J Sports Med (2011)

After a failed meniscal repair the amount of meniscus ultimately resected is limited, supporting an attempt-at-repair strategy that does not sacrifice meniscal substance if it fails.

Evidence

Meniscal repair

Starke C, Kopf S, Petersen W, Becker R β€’ Arthroscopy (2009)

Review of meniscal repair biology, indications and surgical technique.

Evidence

Meniscus: resection, repair, and replacement

Kurzweil PR, Friedman MJ β€’ Arthroscopy (2015)

Comprehensive review of meniscal resection, repair and replacement options and their indications.

Evidence

Repair integrity evaluated by second-look arthroscopy after arthroscopic meniscal repair with the FasT-Fix during anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

Tachibana Y, Sakaguchi K, Goto T, et al. β€’ Am J Sports Med (2010)

Second-look arthroscopy after FasT-Fix all-inside repair performed with ACL reconstruction showed a high rate of healed or healing tears.

Evidence

Arthroscopic versus open repair of medial meniscus posterior root tears: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Nwachukwu BU, McFeely ED, Nasreddine A, et al. β€’ Am J Sports Med (2017)

Systematic review and meta-analysis comparing arthroscopic with open repair of medial meniscal posterior root tears.

Editorially reviewed β€” transparent references and correction processPublished by OrthoVellum Medical Education TeamEditorial boardMethodologyReview policy
Educational disclosure

Educational content is reviewed for source visibility, editorial coherence, and correction readiness.

No individual clinician credential is claimed unless a named person is shown.

Verify before clinical use; this is not medical advice or a substitute for local guidance.

Procedure console
18 minutes
Read
0
Sections
intermediate
Level
Peer-reviewed Β· 2026-06-20
Procedure info
Level
intermediate
Read time
18 minutes
Updated
2026-06-20
SURGICAL APPROACHES USED
Knee Arthroscopy Approach
Browse all procedures