Obstetric Brachial Plexus Palsy — Reconstruction

PaediatricsAdvancedCore Procedure

Obstetric Brachial Plexus Palsy — Reconstruction

Surgical technique guide for primary and secondary reconstruction in obstetric brachial plexus palsy — nerve grafting, nerve transfers, tendon transfers, humeral derotation osteotomy

High-yield overview

Primary nerve reconstruction and secondary reconstructive procedures for birth-related brachial plexus palsy | advanced

Surgical Imaging

Brachial plexus anatomy
The brachial plexus at root and trunk level — in obstetric palsy a neuroma-in-continuity at Erb point may be resected and grafted, or nerve transfers performed, to restore shoulder and elbow function.Credit: AI-generated medical illustration · OrthoVellum
Critical Decision Points and Danger Zones in OBPI Reconstruction
Timing — The 3-Month Rule

The trap: Waiting too long for spontaneous recovery beyond 6 months in a child with no biceps recovery misses the optimal surgical window for primary nerve reconstruction.

The fix: Perform serial monthly assessment of biceps (elbow flexion) and shoulder abduction from birth. If no antigravity biceps (MRC Grade 3 or better) by 3 months of age, refer for surgical opinion. Total plexus palsy with Horner's warrants exploration at 2-3 months without waiting.

Horner's Syndrome — Preganglionic Avulsion

What it means: Horner's syndrome (ptosis, miosis, anhidrosis, enophthalmos) in a newborn with total plexus palsy indicates preganglionic avulsion of C8 and T1 nerve roots from the spinal cord.

Why it matters: Preganglionic avulsions have essentially zero potential for spontaneous recovery. These children require early surgical exploration (by 2-3 months) and have a guarded prognosis for hand function even with optimal reconstruction.

Glenohumeral Dysplasia — The Silent Sequela

Pathogenesis: The persistent internal rotation/adduction contracture from unopposed subscapularis, latissimus dorsi, teres major, and pectoralis major leads to progressive posterior glenoid erosion, humeral head flattening, and fixed dislocation.

Clinical importance: May be silent on plain X-ray in the young child because the humeral head is not yet ossified. Requires MRI or arthrography to detect early. Grade III dysplasia or worse (greater than 5% posterior subluxation with glenoid deformity) may not correct with soft tissue releases alone and may require humeral osteotomy.

Pseudopalsy vs True Obstetric Palsy

The trap: A clavicle fracture, proximal humeral fracture, or shoulder dislocation sustained during delivery can produce a pseudo-paralysis that mimics OBPI.

The fix: Check the Moro (startle) reflex — if present, the child can move the limb involuntarily and true OBPI is less likely. Obtain plain radiographs of the clavicle and humerus in any newborn with suspected OBPI before making the diagnosis. If a fracture is present, the child usually recovers within 2-3 weeks.

Phrenic Nerve — Supraclavicular Danger

Location: The phrenic nerve arises from the C3, C4 and C5 anterior rami and runs on the anterior surface of the anterior scalene muscle, descending into the mediastinum to innervate the diaphragm.

Risk: In the supraclavicular approach to the brachial plexus, the phrenic nerve lies immediately deep to the prevertebral fascia and crosses the operative field. It can be stretched, compressed or divided during exposure of the upper trunk. Injury causes ipsilateral hemidiaphragm paralysis, which is usually well tolerated in infants but may cause respiratory distress in those with pre-existing pulmonary compromise.

Accessory Nerve — Donor Site Morbidity

Relevance: The spinal accessory nerve (cranial nerve XI) is the preferred donor for transfer to the suprascapular nerve to restore shoulder external rotation.

Donor morbidity: Harvest of the distal accessory nerve branch (innervating the middle and lower trapezius) may weaken shoulder shrug and scapular retraction. The proximal branch to the upper trapezius should be preserved. Test trapezius function preoperatively and counsel parents that some scapular winging or shoulder droop may occur post-operatively.

Mnemonic

B.I.C.E.P.SBICEPS — Assessment and Decision Making

Mnemonic

N.A.R.A.K.A.SNARAKAS — When to Operate

Surgical Indications for Primary Nerve Reconstruction

Absolute Indications

  • No antigravity biceps (MRC Grade less than 3) at 3 months of age — the most widely accepted criterion (Narakas, Gilbert)
  • Total plexus palsy (C5-T1) with Horner's syndrome — indicates preganglionic avulsion of C8-T1; negligible spontaneous recovery; operate at 2-3 months
  • Total plexus palsy without Horner's — explore at 3 months if no antigravity elbow flexion
  • Brachial plexus birth injury with complete flail limb and no recovery at 1 month — early exploration may be indicated

Relative Indications

  • Extended Erb's palsy (C5-7) with no biceps recovery at 4-6 months
  • Isolated C5-6 palsy with no biceps at 4-6 months but some shoulder recovery — observe to 6 months if progressive improvement
  • Recovery plateau before antigravity strength is achieved in key muscle groups

Contraindications

Absolute:

  • Active local infection at the surgical site
  • Uncorrected coagulopathy
  • Significant cardiopulmonary comorbidity precluding general anaesthesia

Relative:

  • Late presentation beyond 12-18 months of age (nerve grafting less effective; consider nerve transfers instead)
  • Isolated upper trunk palsy with clear progressive biceps recovery (continue observation)
  • Family non-compliance with post-operative therapy programme

Indications for Secondary Reconstruction

Internal Rotation and Adduction Contracture (most common)

  • Subscapularis release — indicated for passive external rotation less than 20-30 degrees with the shoulder in adduction, in an ambulatory child aged 2-4 years
  • Modified L'Episcopo transfer (latissimus dorsi and teres major to rotator cuff) — indicated when passive external rotation is preserved but active external rotation is absent, in a child aged 3-8 years
  • Humeral derotation osteotomy — indicated for fixed internal rotation deformity with glenohumeral articular congruity (Waters Grade I-II), typically in children older than 4-5 years. Also indicated when soft tissue releases have failed to provide adequate external rotation

Elbow Flexion Deficit (less common)

  • Oberlin transfer (ulnar fascicle to biceps motor branch) — indicated for persistent elbow flexion weakness after failed primary reconstruction, or when primary nerve grafting was not possible
  • Steindler flexorplasty — transfer of the common flexor origin proximally on the humerus for residual elbow flexion weakness
  • Triceps-to-biceps transfer — indicated when the triceps is strong (MRC Grade 4+), the elbow flexors are absent, and other transfer options are not available

ComparisonTable — Erb's vs Total Plexus Palsy

Erb's Palsy (C5-6) vs Total Plexus Palsy (C5-T1)


Key Evidence

Evidence

Surgical repair of the brachial plexus in obstetric paralysis

Level III
Gilbert A, Tassin JLChirurgie
Clinical implication: Biceps recovery by 3 months is the key prognostic determinant; absence is a reliable indication for surgical exploration.
Source: Chirurgie 1984;110(1):70-5
Evidence

Comparison of the natural history, the outcome of microsurgical repair, and the outcome of operative reconstruction in brachial plexus birth palsy

Level II
Waters PMJ Bone Joint Surg Am
Clinical implication: Confirms that the 3-month biceps criterion separates children who will do well with observation alone from those who benefit from nerve reconstruction.
Source: J Bone Joint Surg Am 1999;81(5):649-59
Evidence

Nerve transfer to biceps muscle using part of ulnar nerve for C5-C6 avulsion of the brachial plexus

Level IV
Oberlin C, Béal D, Leechavengvongs S, Salon A, Dauge MC, Sarcy JJJ Hand Surg Am
Clinical implication: The Oberlin transfer is now a standard technique for restoring elbow flexion in both obstetric and adult brachial plexus injuries.
Source: J Hand Surg Am 1994;19(2):232-7
Evidence

The effect of derotational humeral osteotomy on global shoulder function in brachial plexus birth palsy

Level III
Waters PM, Bae DSJ Bone Joint Surg Am
Clinical implication: Humeral derotation osteotomy reliably improves shoulder position and function in children with fixed internal rotation contracture when the glenohumeral joint is congruent.
Source: J Bone Joint Surg Am 2006;88(5):1035-42
Evidence

The early effects of tendon transfers and open capsulorrhaphy on glenohumeral deformity in brachial plexus birth palsy

Level III
Waters PM, Bae DSJ Bone Joint Surg Am
Clinical implication: Tendon transfer combined with subscapularis release improves shoulder external rotation and can partially reverse glenohumeral dysplasia when performed early, before age 4.
Source: J Bone Joint Surg Am 2008;90(10):2171-9

Clinical Decision Scenarios

Practise clinical reasoning and management decisions out loud

Viva scenarioAdvanced
Clinical prompt

A 3-month-old infant presents with a total brachial plexus palsy (C5-T1) after a difficult vaginal delivery. There is Horner's syndrome on the affected side, a flail upper limb with no active movement, and asymmetric Moro reflex. What is your assessment and management plan?

Practical approach
This infant has a total obstetric brachial plexus palsy with Horner's syndrome — the most severe form of birth-related brachial plexus injury. The presence of Horner's indicates preganglionic avulsion of the C8 and T1 nerve roots from the spinal cord. These injuries have essentially no potential for spontaneous recovery and require early surgical intervention.\n\n**Assessment**: I would first confirm the diagnosis by obtaining plain radiographs of the clavicle and humerus to exclude fracture (pseudopalsy). The asymmetric Moro reflex supports a true neurological injury rather than a fracture. I would also perform a baseline chest X-ray to assess diaphragmatic position (the phrenic nerve may have been injured concurrently). An MRI of the cervical spine and brachial plexus (with contrast if possible) can demonstrate pseudomeningoceles, which are indirect signs of preganglionic avulsion, although MRI in a 3-month-old is technically challenging and may require sedation. I document the neurological examination using the Active Movement Scale (AMS) for all upper limb joints — every joint from shoulder to digits.\n\n**Indications for surgery**: This child meets absolute criteria for early surgical exploration — total plexus palsy with Horner's. I would plan surgery at 2-3 months of age (this child is already at 3 months).\n\n**Operative plan**: The goal is to explore the entire brachial plexus through a supraclavicular incision, with infraclavicular extension if needed. I expect to find neuromas at both the upper trunk (C5-6) and the lower trunk (C8-T1) levels, and possibly preganglionic avulsion of C8-T1 (which would be confirmed by the absence of a proximal stump or the presence of dorsal root ganglion tissue). The surgical strategy would be:\n\n1. Neuroma excision of the upper trunk, with sural nerve grafting from proximal C5 and C6 roots to the distal upper trunk and divisions\n2. For the lower trunk (C8-T1), if there is a postganglionic rupture, sural nerve grafting is performed. If there is a preganglionic avulsion (no proximal stump), nerve transfers are required — intercostal nerve transfers or the contralateral C7 transfer are options, though they have limited outcomes\n3. I would also consider performing a spinal-accessory-to-suprascapular nerve transfer in the same sitting to reliably restore shoulder external rotation\n\n**Prognosis**: I would counsel the parents honestly — the prognosis for useful hand function is guarded (less than 40% achieve functional hand). Shoulder and elbow function can be improved but rarely return to normal. The child will require long-term follow-up to skeletal maturity for contracture management, glenohumeral dysplasia surveillance, and possible secondary procedures.\n\n**Post-operative plan**: Three to four weeks of immobilisation, passive ROM exercises starting day 1, serial neurological examinations, and EMG at 4-6 months to detect reinnervation.
Viva scenarioStandard
Clinical prompt

A 3-year-old child presents with a persistent internal rotation and adduction contracture of the right shoulder following an obstetric brachial plexus palsy (Erb's type) that was managed non-operatively. The parents are concerned about the arm hanging in internal rotation when the child walks. How do you assess and manage this?

Practical approach
This child has the most common residuum after obstetric brachial plexus palsy — an internal rotation and adduction contracture of the shoulder. The deformity results from muscle imbalance: the internal rotators (subscapularis, pectoralis major, latissimus dorsi, teres major) are unopposed or overactive because the external rotators (infraspinatus, teres minor) are weak or paralysed from the original C5-6 injury.\n\n**Assessment**: I perform a structured clinical assessment.\n\n1. **History**: Age of the child, hand dominance, functional limitations (difficulty reaching overhead, touching the opposite shoulder, perineal care, sports participation), previous treatment (physiotherapy, splinting, any prior surgery).\n\n2. **Examination**:\n - Passive external rotation — measure with the arm at the side (adduction) and in 90 degrees of abduction. If passive external rotation is less than 20-30 degrees in adduction, a subscapularis contracture is present.\n - Active external rotation — ask the child to bring the hand to the mouth and then reach overhead. Active external rotation lag is the functional deficit.\n - Shoulder abduction — active and passive range.\n - Mallet score — a standardised scoring system for global shoulder function in OBPI. The child is scored on shoulder abduction, external rotation, hand-to-mouth, hand-to-neck, and internal rotation. A score of 15 is normal; less than 12 indicates significant functional impairment.\n - Glenohumeral joint stability — posterior stress test (load and shift) for posterior subluxation.\n\n3. **Imaging**:\n - Plain X-ray of the shoulder (AP and axillary lateral) — assess glenohumeral alignment, humeral head shape. In the 3-year-old, the humeral head is ossifying and the X-ray can show posterior subluxation.\n - MRI of the shoulder (or CT arthrogram) — essential for assessing glenohumeral dysplasia grade (Waters classification). Grade I (normal) to Grade V (fixed dislocation with severe glenoid deformity). This determines whether soft tissue reconstruction alone will suffice or whether humeral osteotomy is required.\n\n**Management decision based on imaging**:\n\n- **Waters Grade I-II (congruent joint, less than 5% posterior subluxation)**: Soft tissue reconstruction is appropriate. I would perform a subscapularis release (open or arthroscopic) combined with a modified L'Episcopo transfer (latissimus dorsi and teres major to the rotator cuff). This addresses both the contracture (release) and the active external rotation deficit (transfer).\n\n- **Waters Grade III or worse (greater than 5% posterior subluxation with glenoid deformity)**: Soft tissue reconstruction alone may not be sufficient. If the joint is still reducible, I would perform the subscapularis release and L'Episcopo transfer, but counsel the parents that the outcome may be limited. If the joint is fixed and dislocated, a humeral derotation osteotomy is more reliable.\n\n- **Fixed deformity with congruent joint (Waters I-II) in an older child (5+ years)**: Humeral derotation osteotomy is a good option.\n\n**Prognosis**: With appropriate reconstruction, the child can expect improved limb positioning, up to 30-50 degrees of active external rotation gain, and better functional use of the limb for overhead activities.
Viva scenarioAdvanced
Clinical prompt

A 15-month-old infant presents with a persistent C5-6 (Erb's) palsy. The parents report the child had some recovery of elbow flexion around 4 months but then plateaued. The child now has MRC Grade 2 biceps, MRC Grade 2 shoulder abduction, and no active external rotation. What is your surgical approach?

Practical approach
This child has an established C5-6 palsy with incomplete recovery — the biceps never reached antigravity (MRC Grade 3 or better) and has plateaued. At 15 months, the child is beyond the optimal window for primary nerve grafting (3-9 months). However, it is not too late for reconstruction. The surgical approach at this age favours nerve transfers over neuroma excision and nerve grafting, because the distance from the proximal nerve stump to the target muscle is too great for reliable regeneration by grafting in a 15-month-old.\n\n**Assessment**: I would first confirm the C5-6 deficit pattern clinically — affected shoulder abduction (deltoid, supraspinatus), external rotation (infraspinatus), and elbow flexion (biceps, brachialis). I would document passive range of motion, looking for developing contractures. I would obtain an MRI of the brachial plexus and cervical spine to assess for neuroma, pseudomeningoceles (suggesting preganglionic avulsion), and root integrity.\n\n**Surgical plan**:\n\n1. **Nerve transfers** are the primary strategy:\n - **Oberlin transfer (ulnar nerve fascicle to biceps motor branch)**: To restore elbow flexion. This is the most reliable transfer for biceps reinnervation and works well even at 15 months because the distance from the coaptation site to the biceps motor end plate is short (3-5 cm).\n - **Spinal accessory to suprascapular nerve transfer (SAN-to-SSN)**: To restore shoulder external rotation. The SAN is identified in the posterior triangle and transferred to the suprascapular nerve at Erb's point.\n - If deltoid function is also absent, a **triceps-to-axillary nerve transfer** (using a branch of the triceps motor nerve) can be considered to restore shoulder abduction, though this is more technically demanding.\n\n2. **Neuroma resection with grafting** is not my primary choice at 15 months because the regeneration distance from proximal root to target muscles (25-30 cm for hand intrinsics, 10-15 cm for shoulder girdle) is too great for reliable recovery at this age. However, if intraoperative findings show a favourable neuroma with healthy proximal and distal stumps within 5-6 cm, nerve grafting remains an option.\n\n3. **Secondary reconstruction** will likely be needed later (after age 2-4) for any residual contractures or deficits.\n\n**Expected outcomes**: Oberlin transfer restores active elbow flexion (MRC Grade 3 or better) in approximately 80-90% of patients by 6-12 months post-operatively. SAN-to-SSN transfer restores active external rotation in approximately 70-80%.\n\n**Post-operative**: Immobilisation for 3-4 weeks (elbow flexed for Oberlin, shoulder in neutral or slight abduction for SAN-to-SSN). Passive ROM from day 1. The first signs of reinnervation are expected at 3-6 months after transfer.
Exam day cheat sheet
Obstetric Brachial Plexus Palsy — Reconstruction: Exam Day Summary

References

Evidence

Surgical repair of the brachial plexus in obstetric paralysis

Level III
Gilbert A, Tassin JLChirurgie
Clinical implication: The 3-month biceps rule remains the single most important clinical tool for selecting surgical candidates.
Source: Chirurgie 1984;110(1):70-5
Evidence

Comparison of the natural history, the outcome of microsurgical repair, and the outcome of operative reconstruction in brachial plexus birth palsy

Level II
Waters PMJ Bone Joint Surg Am
Clinical implication: Confirms that observation is appropriate for early biceps recovery, while surgery improves outcomes for those who fail to recover.
Source: J Bone Joint Surg Am 1999;81(5):649-59
Evidence

Nerve transfer to biceps muscle using part of ulnar nerve for C5-C6 avulsion of the brachial plexus

Level IV
Oberlin C, Béal D, Leechavengvongs S, Salon A, Dauge MC, Sarcy JJJ Hand Surg Am
Clinical implication: The Oberlin transfer is now a standard, reliable option for restoring elbow flexion when proximal nerve stumps are unavailable.
Source: J Hand Surg Am 1994;19(2):232-7
Evidence

The effect of derotational humeral osteotomy on global shoulder function in brachial plexus birth palsy

Level III
Waters PM, Bae DSJ Bone Joint Surg Am
Clinical implication: Humeral derotation osteotomy reliably improves shoulder position and function in children with fixed internal rotation contracture when the glenohumeral joint is congruent.
Source: J Bone Joint Surg Am 2006;88(5):1035-42
Evidence

The early effects of tendon transfers and open capsulorrhaphy on glenohumeral deformity in brachial plexus birth palsy

Level III
Waters PM, Bae DSJ Bone Joint Surg Am
Clinical implication: Tendon transfer combined with subscapularis release improves shoulder external rotation and can partially reverse glenohumeral dysplasia when performed early, before age 4.
Source: J Bone Joint Surg Am 2008;90(10):2171-9
Editorially reviewed — transparent references and correction processPublished by OrthoVellum Medical Education TeamEditorial boardMethodologyReview policy
Educational disclosure

Educational content is reviewed for source visibility, editorial coherence, and correction readiness.

No individual clinician credential is claimed unless a named person is shown.

Verify before clinical use; this is not medical advice or a substitute for local guidance.