ORIF Olecranon
ORIF olecranon fracture — tension band wiring and plate fixation — FRCS/FRACS exam preparation
Reviewed by OrthoVellum Editorial Team
Editorial maintenance, source checking, and correction workflow • Published by OrthoVellum Medical Education Team
Posterior approach — tension band wiring (transverse) or dorsal plate fixation (comminuted/oblique) | intermediate
Surgical Imaging


Critical Danger Structures — 5 Anatomical Zones
Ulnar Nerve
Location: Runs medial to the olecranon in the cubital tunnel, passes between the two heads of FCU distal to the medial epicondyle. At risk during medial soft-tissue dissection and plate application on the medial column.
Protection: Identify and mobilize the ulnar nerve with a vessel loop before any medial dissection. Never place retractors blindly medial to the olecranon. If a medial plate extension is planned, transpose the nerve anteriorly.
K-wire Migration
Risk: Parallel K-wires that do not engage the anterior cortex or are not bent at 180 degrees can migrate proximally or distally. Proximal migration toward the shoulder has been reported. Distal migration through soft tissue can cause tendon or nerve injury.
Prevention: Both K-wires must penetrate and engage the anterior ulnar cortex confirmed on lateral fluoroscopy. Bend the tip 180 degrees into the olecranon. Confirm wire stability on intraoperative stress testing.
Triceps Avulsion
Risk: Vigorous reduction or excessive retraction can disrupt the triceps insertion at the posterior olecranon. Unrecognized avulsion results in extensor mechanism failure — the patient cannot actively extend against gravity.
Prevention: Handle the fracture fragment and periosteum gently. At closure, test active extension against gravity and confirm a complete arc. Repair any avulsed fibres with transosseous sutures before skin closure.
Posterior Interosseous Nerve
Location: Enters the supinator 10–20 mm distal to the radial head. At risk only if the approach is extended laterally (e.g., combined radial head or lateral column pathology).
Protection: Maintain full forearm supination if extending the approach laterally. Do not place retractors deep to the supinator. Limit lateral dissection to within 2 cm of the radial head.
Tension Band Wire Loop Slippage
Risk: If the figure-of-8 wire loop does not pass through the triceps tendon and seat anterior to the axis of rotation (i.e., anterior ulnar cortex level), the construct does not generate compression — it generates distraction and will fail. Wire loop slippage off the K-wire tips also destabilises fixation.
Prevention: Pass the figure-of-8 wire through the triceps tendon, not superficially around it. Seat the wire loop anterior to the K-wires on both cortices. Confirm compression at the fracture site with intraoperative fluoroscopy and manual stress testing before closure.
MAYOMAYO — Olecranon Fracture Classification
PLATEPLATE — Indications for Plate Over Tension Band Wiring
Indications and Fixation Decision
Mayo Classification and Operative Indications
| Mayo Type | Description | Treatment |
|---|---|---|
| I (undisplaced) | Less than 2 mm displacement, intact extensor mechanism | Cast or splint in 45-90 degrees for 2–3 weeks; early ROM |
| IIA (displaced, non-comminuted, stable) | Greater than 2 mm, no elbow instability, two main fragments | TBW (transverse) or plate (oblique/proximal) |
| IIB (displaced, comminuted, stable) | Comminution present, no instability | Plate fixation preferred over TBW |
| IIIA (unstable, non-comminuted) | Elbow instability, subluxation, or dislocation | Plate fixation mandatory; address instability |
| IIIB (unstable, comminuted) | Instability with comminution | Plate fixation; may need ligament reconstruction |
TBW vs Plate — Decision Summary
Tension Band Wiring is appropriate for:
- Simple transverse fractures (Mayo IIA) in good bone quality
- Fractures involving less than 80% of the articular surface
- Active patients with good bone stock
- Osteotomy fixation (as part of distal humerus ORIF approach)
Plate Fixation is preferred for:
- Comminuted fractures (Mayo IIB or IIIB)
- Oblique fracture patterns
- Fractures involving more than 80% articular surface
- Osteoporotic or elderly patients
- Mayo type III (any elbow instability)
- Very proximal fractures (fragment too small for K-wires)
- Fractures extending into the coronoid
Key Evidence
Wolfgang et al. (CORR, 1987; PMID 3665240): Landmark series of 45 displaced olecranon fractures treated by TBW over 13 years, with good or excellent results in 29 of 30 isolated fractures (97%). Established TBW as a reliable technique; true K-wire migration was uncommon and considered avoidable with correct technique.
Hume and Wiss (CORR, 1992; PMID 1446443): Prospective randomised trial of 41 displaced olecranon fractures comparing TBW versus plate fixation. Loss of reduction (significant articular step-off or gap) occurred in 53% after TBW versus 5% after plate; good clinical results in 37% (TBW) versus 63% (plate). Symptomatic metal prominence followed TBW in 42%. Concluded plate fixation should be carefully considered for displaced fractures.
Schliemann et al. (Acta Orthop Belg, 2014; PMID 24873093): Comparison of TBW versus precontoured locking compression plate in isolated Mayo type IIA fractures. No significant difference in DASH or Mayo Elbow Performance Score; locking plates did not improve functional or radiographic outcome and were more expensive. Implant-related irritation requiring removal was more frequent after TBW.
Carter, Duckworth et al. (JBJS Essent Surg Tech, 2018; PMID 30588367): Modern operative-technique reference reporting a prospective randomised trial of plate versus TBW in 67 active adults — no difference in patient- or surgeon-reported outcomes, but implant removal was required in roughly 1 in 2 patients after TBW. Notably, infection and revision surgery occurred exclusively after plate fixation.
Biomechanical Principles of Tension Band Wiring
The tension band principle is fundamental to orthopaedic surgery and applies to any fracture surface under eccentric loading:
- The axis of rotation of the elbow passes through the centre of the trochlea
- Triceps contraction applies a posterior (distracting) force to the olecranon
- A tension band wire positioned anterior to the axis of rotation converts this deforming force into compression at the fracture site
- This is only effective when the fracture surface is transverse (perpendicular to the long axis) and the posterior cortex is intact
- In an oblique fracture, the wire generates shear rather than compression — fixation fails
Why TBW fails in certain patterns:
- Comminuted fractures: no stable cortex to resist compression — fragments split
- Osteoporotic bone: K-wires pull out of soft bone — cannot maintain wire tension
- Very proximal fractures: insufficient bone in the proximal fragment for K-wire purchase
An evidence-based caveat: cadaveric cyclic-loading work (Hutchinson et al., JBJS Am 2003; PMID 12728033) showed that the AO K-wire tension band did not generate measurable compression across the osteotomy gap and that an intramedullary 7.3 mm cancellous screw with a tension band was roughly five times stiffer than the classic K-wire construct. The clinical implication for the exam is that the tension-band "compression" concept holds best as a model rather than a guaranteed mechanical fact — favour passive over aggressive active extension early, and consider screw-based or plate constructs where stiffness matters.
Non-operative Management (Mayo Type I)
Mayo type I fractures (less than 2 mm displacement, intact extensor mechanism) may be managed non-operatively:
- Posterior splint or collar-and-cuff in 45–90 degrees flexion for 2–3 weeks
- Begin early active ROM at 2–3 weeks; avoid passive extension
- Serial radiographs at 1 and 3 weeks to confirm no secondary displacement
- Failure — secondary displacement of greater than 2 mm — requires operative intervention
- Outcomes comparable to operative management in undisplaced fractures (Duckworth et al., JBJS 2014)
Positioning and Preparation
Patient Position: Lateral decubitus with the injured elbow uppermost, draped free over a padded bolster. This allows full elbow extension and easy fluoroscopy access. Alternatively: prone on chest rolls, or supine with arm across chest on a hand table. Confirm ability to obtain AP and lateral fluoroscopy views before draping.
Tourniquet: Sterile or non-sterile pneumatic tourniquet on the proximal arm. Inflate to 250 mmHg for an upper limb. Consider tourniquet release after 90 minutes if the procedure is prolonged.
Equipment needed: 1.6 mm K-wires (two), 1.25 mm stainless steel wire, wire twister (Kocher clamp), wire bender/pin bender, Weber reduction clamp, fluoroscopy unit, pre-contoured locking olecranon plate (available but may not be used), oscillating saw (if combined with osteotomy work).
Fluoroscopy positioning: Confirm clear AP (elbow extended) and lateral (90 degrees flexion) views are obtainable before incision. The lateral view is critical for confirming K-wire anterior cortex engagement.
Critical Decision Points
Decision 1 — TBW or Plate?
At fracture exposure, reassess the pattern under direct vision. If the fracture is:
- Simple transverse, good bone quality, young patient → proceed with TBW as planned
- More oblique than expected on radiographs → switch to plate
- More comminuted than pre-operative imaging suggested → switch to plate
- Bone quality poor (K-wires do not hold during provisional fixation) → switch to plate
Exam tip: It is entirely appropriate to change the planned technique intraoperatively based on direct assessment. This demonstrates good surgical judgment. State in the viva: "I would re-assess the fracture pattern under direct vision and be prepared to convert to plate fixation if the pattern does not suit TBW."
Decision 2 — Articular Congruity
After any reduction manoeuvre, confirm there is no articular step-off under direct vision and on fluoroscopy. Post-traumatic elbow arthritis directly correlates with articular incongruity. A step-off of greater than 2 mm is unacceptable.
Decision 3 — Elbow Stability (Mayo III Fractures)
After olecranon fixation in any fracture that had associated subluxation or dislocation, perform a stress test under fluoroscopy:
- Valgus stress: opens more than 3 mm → MCL injury
- Varus stress: LUCL disruption (posterolateral rotatory instability)
- Posterior stress with the elbow in extension: posterior instability
Address each component before closure. Leaving residual instability results in re-dislocation post-operatively.
Clinical Decision Scenarios
Use these scenarios to practise clinical reasoning and management decisions
"A 35-year-old cyclist falls directly onto the elbow and presents with point tenderness over the olecranon. Radiographs show a transverse olecranon fracture displaced 5 mm with a maintained joint line. The elbow is stable. Describe your decision-making and operative technique."
"A 65-year-old woman with known osteoporosis sustains a fall from standing. She presents with a comminuted olecranon fracture (Mayo IIIB) with associated subluxation of the elbow. How do you manage this?"
"A patient returns at 6 months after TBW of a Mayo IIA olecranon fracture. They have pain directly over the olecranon and a palpable prominence. Radiographs confirm fracture union with prominent K-wire tips visible subcutaneously. How do you manage this?"
ORIF Olecranon — Exam Summary
Clinical summary
Evidence Base
Randomised trial — TBW vs plate fixation for displaced olecranon fractures
Randomised trial — non-operative vs operative management in the elderly
TBW vs precontoured locking plate in Mayo type IIA fractures
Biomechanical cyclic-loading of olecranon fixation constructs
References
-
Wolfgang G, Burke F, Bush D, et al. Surgical treatment of displaced olecranon fractures by tension band wiring technique. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1987;(224):192-204. PMID: 3665240
-
Hume MC, Wiss DA. Olecranon fractures. A clinical and radiographic comparison of tension band wiring and plate fixation. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1992;(285):229-235. PMID: 1446443
-
Karlsson MK, Hasserius R, Karlsson C, Besjakov J, Josefsson PO. Fractures of the olecranon: a 15- to 25-year follow-up of 73 patients. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002;(403):205-212. PMID: 12360028
-
Duckworth AD, Bugler KE, Clement ND, Court-Brown CM, McQueen MM. Nonoperative management of displaced olecranon fractures in low-demand elderly patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014;96(1):67-72. PMID: 24382727. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.L.01137
-
Duckworth AD, Clement ND, McEachan JE, White TO, Court-Brown CM, McQueen MM. Prospective randomised trial of non-operative versus operative management of olecranon fractures in the elderly. Bone Joint J. 2017;99-B(7):964-972. PMID: 28663405. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.99B7.BJJ-2016-1112.R2
-
Carter TH, Molyneux SG, Reid JT, White TO, Duckworth AD. Tension-Band Wire Fixation of Olecranon Fractures. JBJS Essent Surg Tech. 2018;8(3):e22. PMID: 30588367. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.17.00071
-
Schliemann B, Raschke MJ, Groene P, Weimann A, Wähnert D, Lenschow S, Kösters C. Comparison of tension band wiring and precontoured locking compression plate fixation in Mayo type IIA olecranon fractures. Acta Orthop Belg. 2014;80(1):106-111. PMID: 24873093
-
Rommens PM, Küchle R, Schneider RU, Reuter M. Olecranon fractures in adults: factors influencing outcome. Injury. 2004;35(11):1149-1157. PMID: 15488508. DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2003.12.002
-
Hutchinson DT, Horwitz DS, Ha G, Thomas CW, Bachus KN. Cyclic loading of olecranon fracture fixation constructs. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85(5):831-837. PMID: 12728033. DOI: 10.2106/00004623-200305000-00010