Skip to main content
OrthoVellumOrthopaedic Exam Prep
Pricing
About OrthoVellum
OrthoVellum
A living orthopaedic atlas

Exam-focused orthopaedic references, a question bank, viva practice, and spaced-repetition revision β€” with every clinical claim traceable to its source. Content is educational only and is not a substitute for local supervision, clinical judgement, or institutional policy.


Library

  • Clinical Topics
  • Blog
  • Site Updates
  • Content Methodology

Company

  • About Us
  • Authors & Disclosure
  • Editorial Team
  • Editorial Policy
  • Advertising Policy

Legal

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Medical Disclaimer
  • Copyright & DMCA

Support

  • Support OrthoVellum
  • Help Center
  • Contact
  • Accessibility
Evidence. Clarity. Practice.

Β© 2026 OrthoVellum. For educational purposes only.

Not medical advice. Verify clinically important information against current local guidance.

Posterior Approach to Humerus

Operative SurgeryTrauma
TraumaIntermediate

Posterior Approach to Humerus

Comprehensive guide to the posterior approach to the humerus for mid-shaft fracture fixation and radial nerve exploration, including radial nerve anatomy in the spiral groove, triceps management techniques, and approach extensibility for entire humeral shaft access.

Procedure console
20 min
Read
0
Sections
intermediate
Level
Peer-reviewed Β· 2026-06-20
High-yield overview

Triceps Split | Radial Nerve in the Spiral Groove | Extensile Humeral Shaft Access

~12%Radial nerve palsy in humeral shaft fractures (11.8%, Shao 2005); Holstein-Lewis distal-third spiral pattern is the classic high-alert eponym
~14cmRadial nerve crosses the posterior humerus a mean 14.2cm above the lateral epicondyle / 20.7cm above the medial epicondyle (Gerwin 1996), then pierces the lateral intermuscular septum ~10cm above the lateral epicondyle
2-5%Iatrogenic radial nerve injury during posterior ORIF (highest risk with distal extension)
95-98%Primary union rate with compression plating via the posterior approach
3-6 monthsSpontaneous recovery of a primary radial nerve palsy (90-95% of primary palsies are contusion/traction)
Critical Must-Knows
  • The posterior approach gives DIRECT radial nerve visualisation in the spiral groove (ideal for nerve exploration) and extensile access to the entire humeral shaft (olecranon to deltoid insertion) β€” the workhorse approach for mid-distal shaft fractures.
  • There is NO true internervous plane posteriorly: all three triceps heads are radial-nerve territory, and the medial (deep) head is innervated from the LATERAL side (Gerwin 1996), so a lateral-to-medial split risks denervating the medial head. Protect the nerve directly rather than trusting a 'safe' interval.
  • The radial nerve crosses the posterior humerus in the spiral groove from medial to lateral (Gerwin 1996: mean 14.2cm above the lateral epicondyle, 20.7cm above the medial epicondyle), then pierces the lateral intermuscular septum to run ANTERIOR ~10cm above the lateral epicondyle.
  • Primary indication: mid-distal humeral shaft fractures with or without radial nerve palsy (~12% baseline palsy; Shao 2005 found middle and middle-distal shaft fractures and transverse/spiral patterns most associated with palsy).
  • Nerve protection principle: identify the nerve PROXIMAL to the fracture FIRST, trace it continuously through the spiral groove staying subperiosteal, and protect it during plate/screw placement (avoid anterior cortex penetration distal to the groove).
  • Extensile capability: proximal extension to the deltoid insertion, distal extension to the olecranon (20-25cm total incision for long-segment fixation).

When & Why


What it exposes. The posterior approach to the humerus is the workhorse exposure for mid-distal humeral shaft fracture fixation. It gives direct visualisation of the radial nerve in its spiral-groove course and extensile access to the distal two-thirds of the shaft β€” from the deltoid insertion down to the olecranon. It is the approach of choice whenever the radial nerve must be explored, and for fractures needing long-segment or dual-column distal fixation where anterolateral access is inadequate. Why posterior. The posterior approach is favoured for mid-distal shaft fractures because it puts the surgeon directly on the radial nerve in the groove (rather than having to mobilise it across an anterior field) and exploits the broad, flat posterior cortex that seats a long plate well. The trade-off is patient positioning (lateral decubitus or prone) and the absence of a true internervous plane β€” both manageable with careful technique. It is particularly valuable for the ~12% of shaft fractures complicated by radial nerve palsy (Shao 2005), where inspection at ORIF distinguishes nerve laceration from contusion/traction. Indications Absolute

  • Humeral shaft fracture with radial nerve palsy (~12% prevalence, Shao 2005) β€” allows direct nerve exploration (explore immediately if secondary palsy after manipulation; expectantly if primary palsy with no recovery by 3-4 months).
  • Humeral shaft fracture with vascular injury (proximal brachial artery control).
  • Open humeral shaft fracture (debridement and stabilisation).
  • Pathological fracture (tumour excision and reconstruction).
  • Failed nonoperative management (progressive deformity, neurovascular compromise, nonunion). Relative
  • Mid-distal humeral shaft fractures (posterior preferred over anterolateral for the distal third).
  • Long-segment / comminuted fractures needing a long plate.
  • Bilateral shaft fractures (functional bracing impossible) and polytrauma (early stabilisation to mobilise).
  • Floating elbow (ipsilateral forearm fracture β€” humeral stabilisation needed for elbow stability).
  • Patient factors: obesity, non-compliance, inability to tolerate prolonged bracing. Contraindications
  • Absolute: active infection at the surgical site, inadequate soft-tissue cover (reconstruct first), medical instability for anaesthesia.
  • Relative: acceptable alignment manageable nonoperatively (functional bracing succeeds in 70-90% of shaft fractures); minimal displacement (less than 20 degrees angulation, less than 3cm shortening); severe osteoporosis (intramedullary nailing may be preferred); severe soft-tissue injury (staged reconstruction). Position & landmarks. Lateral decubitus is preferred β€” the affected arm is superior and free-draped so it can be manipulated and fluoroscoped, gravity assists triceps retraction, and conversion to anterolateral is easy. Use an axillary roll under the dependent axilla, pad all bony prominences, and position the elbow flexed 90 degrees with the shoulder forward-flexed 20-30 degrees. Prone is an alternative (excellent posterior access, good for proximal extension) but makes fluoroscopy harder and adds physiological stress; supine with the arm across the chest is generally not recommended. Palpable landmarks: the posterior acromion (proximal), the olecranon tip (distal), the lateral epicondyle (the radial nerve crosses the posterior humerus a mean 14.2cm above it, Gerwin 1996), and the palpable posterior humeral border that guides the skin incision. Posterior vs anterolateral β€” how to choose

Anatomic plane
Posterior
Triceps split (long vs lateral head) β€” NOT a true internervous plane (all heads radial-nerve territory)
Anterolateral
Proximally deltopectoral; distally between brachialis (musculocutaneous + radial) and brachioradialis (radial)
Radial nerve access
Posterior
DIRECT visualisation in the spiral groove (ideal for nerve exploration)
Anterolateral
Nerve crosses the field anteriorly β€” requires mobilisation, higher injury risk
Distal extent
Posterior
Excellent (extends to olecranon with triceps reflection/osteotomy)
Anterolateral
Limited to ~5cm above the elbow (brachialis insertion)
Proximal extent
Posterior
Good (deltoid split to the surgical neck)
Anterolateral
Excellent (continuous with deltopectoral approach to the shoulder)
Patient position
Posterior
Lateral decubitus or prone (more complex setup)
Anterolateral
Supine (simpler setup, easier anaesthesia)
Iatrogenic nerve injury
Posterior
2-5% (nerve visible, easier to protect)
Anterolateral
5-8% (nerve must be mobilised across the field)
Best for
Posterior
Mid-distal shaft fractures, nerve palsy, long-segment fixation
Anterolateral
Proximal-mid shaft fractures, combined shoulder/humerus surgery
Posterior vs anterolateral approach to the humerus
FeaturePosteriorAnterolateral
Anatomic planeTriceps split (long vs lateral head) β€” NOT a true internervous plane (all heads radial-nerve territory)Proximally deltopectoral; distally between brachialis (musculocutaneous + radial) and brachioradialis (radial)
Radial nerve accessDIRECT visualisation in the spiral groove (ideal for nerve exploration)Nerve crosses the field anteriorly β€” requires mobilisation, higher injury risk
Distal extentExcellent (extends to olecranon with triceps reflection/osteotomy)Limited to ~5cm above the elbow (brachialis insertion)
Proximal extentGood (deltoid split to the surgical neck)Excellent (continuous with deltopectoral approach to the shoulder)
Patient positionLateral decubitus or prone (more complex setup)Supine (simpler setup, easier anaesthesia)
Iatrogenic nerve injury2-5% (nerve visible, easier to protect)5-8% (nerve must be mobilised across the field)
Best forMid-distal shaft fractures, nerve palsy, long-segment fixationProximal-mid shaft fractures, combined shoulder/humerus surgery
Iatrogenic radial nerve palsy rates are statistically similar across the two approaches (Streufert 2020), so the choice is driven by the exposure you need, not a presumed "safe" interval. Both achieve 95-98% union with appropriate technique.

The Exposure


Work down through the layers in the lateral decubitus position: a midline posterior incision, a triceps split between the long and lateral heads, then identification and protection of the radial nerve in the spiral groove before any fracture work. The exposure is built around one principle β€” find the nerve proximal to the fracture first and never lose sight of it.

Posterior humerus approach
Posterior approach to the humerus: the triceps is split and the radial nerve identified in the spiral groove.Credit: OrthoVellum surgical illustration

Exposure sequence

Step 1Skin incision and superficial dissection
  • Mark a 10-15cm midline posterior incision centred over the fracture, along the palpable posterior humeral border. Offset 1-2cm lateral to true midline if you want to keep the plate off the skin directly.
  • Extend proximally toward the posterior acromion or distally toward the olecranon as the fracture demands (extensile option: olecranon to acromion, 20-25cm, for long-segment fixation).
  • Incise skin and subcutaneous tissue in line with the mark and raise full-thickness flaps medially and laterally to expose the triceps fascia over a 5-7cm width.
  • Identify and preserve the posterior cutaneous nerve of the forearm running along the medial border of the incision where visible.
Step 2Triceps management β€” split between long and lateral heads
  • Palpate the interval between the long head (medial) and lateral head (lateral) of triceps; look for the white raphe between the muscle bellies.
  • Incise the triceps fascia in this line, starting distally at the musculotendinous junction (5-7cm above the olecranon) and extending proximally toward the deltoid insertion.
  • Split the muscle bluntly along the natural cleavage plane. This is NOT a true internervous plane β€” branches to the lateral head cross here and the medial head is innervated from the lateral side (Gerwin 1996) β€” split carefully to preserve them.
  • Retract the long head medially and the lateral head laterally to expose the medial (deep) head on the posterior humerus.
Step 3Identify and protect the radial nerve β€” PROXIMAL first
  • Before touching the fracture, find the radial nerve where it is safest β€” in the spiral groove, emerging between the long head and the lateral/medial head mass (Gerwin 1996: posterior crossing a mean 20.7cm above the medial epicondyle).
  • Confirm it as a cord-like structure crossing the posterior humerus medial-to-lateral, accompanied by the profunda brachii artery; a gentle nerve stimulator gives triceps contraction and confirms identity.
  • Trace it continuously distally through the groove, staying subperiosteal on bone so the nerve stays within the soft-tissue envelope.
  • Watch the nerve disappear at the lateral intermuscular septum (~10cm above the lateral epicondyle; posterior crossing mean 14.2cm above it) β€” this is expected anatomy, not an injury. Posterior access ends here.
  • Pass a vessel loop for atraumatic handling; mobilise the fracture fragments away from the nerve, never the nerve away from the fragments.
Step 4Fracture exposure and reduction
  • Incise the deep medial head longitudinally only where needed for fracture access and elevate it subperiosteally β€” the radial nerve lies deep to it in the groove, so protect it during this elevation.
  • Strip periosteum only at the fracture ends (preserve the fracture haematoma and biology); avoid circumferential stripping, which devascularises fragments.
  • Irrigate to clear haematoma and loose debris, assess the pattern (simple transverse/oblique vs comminuted; butterfly fragments), and reduce under fluoroscopy β€” restore length, rotation and alignment with bone clamps and confirm the nerve is not trapped between the fragments.
Step 5Plate application and fixation
  • Choose a 4.5mm narrow LC-DCP or LCP, pre-contoured to the posterior humeral curvature; aim for at least 3-4 cortices (6-8 screw holes) proximal and distal to the fracture, longer for comminuted patterns.
  • Centre the plate over the fracture; confirm it does not impinge on the nerve distally (the nerve lies anterior to bone distal to the groove).
  • Place 3-4 bicortical screws each side. For simple/short-oblique patterns, load an LC-DCP eccentrically (or add a lag screw perpendicular to the fracture line) for interfragmentary compression; for comminuted patterns, use a long bridging plate and preserve biology.
  • Palpate the anterior cortex before drilling distal screws β€” anterior cortex penetration where the nerve lies anteriorly equals nerve injury. Confirm position, screw length and reduction on AP and lateral fluoroscopy.
Step 6Closure and postoperative care
  • Re-inspect the radial nerve: confirm it is not compressed by or tethered to hardware and lies freely β€” document its integrity (critical for medicolegal and decision-making).
  • Copious saline lavage, then close in layers: reapproximate the triceps split with interrupted absorbable sutures (0-Vicryl, do not over-tighten), close the subcutaneous layer (2-0/3-0 Vicryl) and skin (staples or subcuticular).
  • Dressing plus an optional posterior long-arm splint for 1-2 weeks (comfort only β€” not required for stability).
  • Check radial nerve function on emergence from anaesthetic (compare with the documented pre-op exam); begin gentle active elbow/shoulder ROM at week 1-2, progress to strengthening at 6-12 weeks, unrestricted activity after union.
Identify the radial nerve proximal to the fracture β€” first, always

The single most critical structure in this approach is the radial nerve, which lies directly on bone in the spiral groove (mean 14.2cm above the lateral epicondyle, 20.7cm above the medial epicondyle; Gerwin 1996). Find it proximal to the fracture before any manipulation, trace it continuously while staying subperiosteal, and keep it visible throughout. Iatrogenic injury (2-5%) is highest during distal extension where the nerve has crossed anterior to the septum and is vulnerable to retractors and anterior-cortex screw penetration.

There is no true internervous plane posteriorly

All three triceps heads are radial-nerve territory, and the medial head is innervated from the lateral side (Gerwin 1996). Do not rely on a "safe interval" β€” split between the long and lateral heads carefully, protect the crossing branches, and triceps strength is well preserved. The old "pure internervous plane" label for the posterior approach is anatomically inaccurate.

Dangers & Extensions


Structures at risk, by layer

Spiral groove
Structure at risk
Radial nerve on bone (mean 14.2cm above lateral epicondyle, Gerwin 1996)
Protection
Identify proximal to fracture first; trace subperiosteally; vessel loop; never lose sight of it
Spiral groove
Structure at risk
Profunda brachii artery with the nerve
Protection
Bipolar haemostasis; ligate if injured (collaterals adequate); avoid cautery near the nerve
Distal extension
Structure at risk
Radial nerve where it has crossed anterior to the septum (~10cm above lateral epicondyle)
Protection
Highest iatrogenic-injury zone; meticulous screw length, no anterior-cortex penetration
Triceps split
Structure at risk
Medial-head innervation (from the lateral side) and lateral-head branches
Protection
No true internervous plane; split carefully between long and lateral heads, preserve crossing branches
Skin / subcutaneous
Structure at risk
Posterior cutaneous nerve of the forearm
Protection
Full-thickness flaps; identify and preserve where visible along the medial border
Danger structures and how to protect them
LayerStructure at riskProtection
Spiral grooveRadial nerve on bone (mean 14.2cm above lateral epicondyle, Gerwin 1996)Identify proximal to fracture first; trace subperiosteally; vessel loop; never lose sight of it
Spiral grooveProfunda brachii artery with the nerveBipolar haemostasis; ligate if injured (collaterals adequate); avoid cautery near the nerve
Distal extensionRadial nerve where it has crossed anterior to the septum (~10cm above lateral epicondyle)Highest iatrogenic-injury zone; meticulous screw length, no anterior-cortex penetration
Triceps splitMedial-head innervation (from the lateral side) and lateral-head branchesNo true internervous plane; split carefully between long and lateral heads, preserve crossing branches
Skin / subcutaneousPosterior cutaneous nerve of the forearmFull-thickness flaps; identify and preserve where visible along the medial border

The radial nerve in detail β€” anatomy, epidemiology and protection

Radial nerve: anatomy & injury epidemiology

Course. The radial nerve (posterior cord, C5-T1) runs posteromedially on the medial head of triceps, crosses the posterior humerus in the spiral groove medial-to-lateral (Gerwin 1996: mean 20.7cm above the medial epicondyle, 14.2cm above the lateral epicondyle), then pierces the lateral intermuscular septum ~10cm above the lateral epicondyle to run anteriorly. It lies directly on bone in the groove, making it susceptible to injury with displacement. It is accompanied by the profunda brachii artery, and divides distally into the superficial sensory branch and the posterior interosseous nerve (motor to the extensors). Epidemiology (Shao 2005 meta-analysis, 4517 fractures). Overall radial nerve palsy prevalence 11.8%; middle and middle-distal shaft fractures and transverse/spiral patterns were most associated with palsy (p less than 0.001). Iatrogenic injury during plating runs ~12% across approaches with no significant difference between anterolateral and posterior (Streufert 2020). Primary vs secondary vs iatrogenic palsy. Primary (at injury): high spontaneous recovery (Shao 2005: 70.7% in conservatively treated, overall recovery 88.1%). Secondary (after manipulation): raises concern for nerve entrapment β€” lower threshold to explore. Iatrogenic (new deficit immediately post-op): recovers well (Streufert 2020: 95%) but must be distinguished from a pre-existing palsy β€” document the pre-op exam. Clinical examination. Wrist drop (ECRL/ECRB/ECU), finger MCP extension weakness (EDC), thumb extension weakness (EPL/EPB), sensory loss in the first dorsal web space (superficial radial nerve), and brachioradialis weakness.

Nerve protection at surgery

1. Identify the nerve proximal to the fracture FIRST, before manipulating any fragment β€” locate it in the spiral groove and confirm identity by tracing its course and appearance. 2. Trace it continuously through the spiral groove, staying subperiosteal on the humerus so the nerve remains in the soft-tissue plane; follow it medial-to-lateral and note where it exits to pierce the septum. 3. Minimise retraction β€” gentle mobilisation only, atraumatic vessel-loop handling, never sharp retractors directly on the nerve; if tethered to the fracture, move the fragments away from the nerve, not vice versa. 4. Protect during hardware placement β€” distal screws must not penetrate the anterior cortex where the nerve lies anteriorly; bicortical purchase is safe in the mid-shaft (nerve posterior) but dangerous distally (nerve anterior). Use drill guides perpendicular to bone and check length on fluoroscopy. 5. Document nerve function β€” pre-op exam (distinguishes pre-existing from iatrogenic palsy), immediate post-op nerve check (a NEW deficit warrants re-exploration within 72 hours), and serial exams for a pre-existing palsy (spontaneous recovery 90-95% by 3-6 months). At exploration: primary 8-0/9-0 nylon epineurial repair for a clean laceration, neurolysis for a contusion, and delayed grafting 3-6 weeks for a transection.

Complications and their management

Intraoperative
Complication (rate)
Radial nerve iatrogenic injury (2-5%)
Recognition & management
Identify nerve first, subperiosteal dissection; clean laceration: primary epineurial repair; contusion: observe; transection: tag ends, delayed graft 3-6 weeks
Intraoperative
Complication (rate)
Profunda brachii artery injury
Recognition & management
Pulsatile groove bleeding not controlled by cautery; ligate with suture ligatures (collaterals adequate), avoid cautery near the nerve
Intraoperative
Complication (rate)
Inadequate reduction / hardware malposition
Recognition & management
Fluoroscopic check of alignment, rotation, screw length; redirect screws, reposition plate; anterior-cortex penetration = nerve risk
Early (0-6 wk)
Complication (rate)
Wound infection (2-3%)
Recognition & management
Superficial: oral cephalexin/clindamycin; deep: return to OR for I&D, IV antibiotics; prophylactic cefazolin 2g pre-op
Early
Complication (rate)
Haematoma
Recognition & management
Small: observe (resorbs 2-4 wk); large/tense/infected: aspirate or open drainage; meticulous haemostasis
Early
Complication (rate)
Elbow/shoulder stiffness (10-15%)
Recognition & management
Early ROM from week 1-2; NSAIDs; manipulation under anaesthesia rarely by 12 weeks
Late
Complication (rate)
Nonunion (5-10%)
Recognition & management
Atrophic: revision ORIF + longer plate + autograft Β± BMP-2; hypertrophic: compression plating or IM nail. Risks: smoking, diabetes, distal-third watershed, over-stripping
Late
Complication (rate)
Delayed radial nerve recovery / neuroma
Recognition & management
Persistent palsy beyond 6 months: cock-up splint, serial EMG; tendon transfers if no recovery by 12-18 months (PT to ECRB, FCR/FCU to EDC, PL to EPL). Neuroma: neurolysis Β± resection/burial
Late
Complication (rate)
Hardware irritation (5-8%)
Recognition & management
Prominent plate in thin patients; remove after union (12-18 months); prevent with low-profile plates and adequate cover
Complications β€” timing, rate and management
TimingComplication (rate)Recognition & management
IntraoperativeRadial nerve iatrogenic injury (2-5%)Identify nerve first, subperiosteal dissection; clean laceration: primary epineurial repair; contusion: observe; transection: tag ends, delayed graft 3-6 weeks
IntraoperativeProfunda brachii artery injuryPulsatile groove bleeding not controlled by cautery; ligate with suture ligatures (collaterals adequate), avoid cautery near the nerve
IntraoperativeInadequate reduction / hardware malpositionFluoroscopic check of alignment, rotation, screw length; redirect screws, reposition plate; anterior-cortex penetration = nerve risk
Early (0-6 wk)Wound infection (2-3%)Superficial: oral cephalexin/clindamycin; deep: return to OR for I&D, IV antibiotics; prophylactic cefazolin 2g pre-op
EarlyHaematomaSmall: observe (resorbs 2-4 wk); large/tense/infected: aspirate or open drainage; meticulous haemostasis
EarlyElbow/shoulder stiffness (10-15%)Early ROM from week 1-2; NSAIDs; manipulation under anaesthesia rarely by 12 weeks
LateNonunion (5-10%)Atrophic: revision ORIF + longer plate + autograft Β± BMP-2; hypertrophic: compression plating or IM nail. Risks: smoking, diabetes, distal-third watershed, over-stripping
LateDelayed radial nerve recovery / neuromaPersistent palsy beyond 6 months: cock-up splint, serial EMG; tendon transfers if no recovery by 12-18 months (PT to ECRB, FCR/FCU to EDC, PL to EPL). Neuroma: neurolysis Β± resection/burial
LateHardware irritation (5-8%)Prominent plate in thin patients; remove after union (12-18 months); prevent with low-profile plates and adequate cover

Postoperative course. Phase 1 (weeks 0-2): wound healing, pain control, pendulums and passive/active-assisted elbow ROM, optional posterior splint for comfort only. Phase 2 (weeks 2-6): active ROM, gentle stretching, light ADLs, no lifting greater than 5 lbs; week-6 radiographs for early callus. Phase 3 (weeks 6-12): strengthening (theraband, light dumbbells) once bridging callus and no fracture-site pain; return to non-manual work week 6-8. Phase 4 (week 12+): unrestricted activity once 4/4 cortices bridged, full ROM and 80%+ contralateral strength. Extensions

Proximal (toward posterior acromion)
What it adds
Proximal shaft and surgical neck; deltoid split parallel to fibres
Key caution
Identify the axillary nerve (5-7cm below the acromion); limit the deltoid split to 5cm to avoid denervation
Distal (toward olecranon)
What it adds
Distal metaphysis and intra-articular distal humerus
Key caution
Triceps V-Y lengthening OR olecranon osteotomy (chevron, tension-band/plate fixation) β€” adds triceps/olecranon morbidity
Combined posterior + lateral
What it adds
Dual-column plating of complex distal humerus fractures (AO/OTA 13C)
Key caution
Separate lateral incision over the lateral epicondyle for the lateral column
Extensile options
DirectionWhat it addsKey caution
Proximal (toward posterior acromion)Proximal shaft and surgical neck; deltoid split parallel to fibresIdentify the axillary nerve (5-7cm below the acromion); limit the deltoid split to 5cm to avoid denervation
Distal (toward olecranon)Distal metaphysis and intra-articular distal humerusTriceps V-Y lengthening OR olecranon osteotomy (chevron, tension-band/plate fixation) β€” adds triceps/olecranon morbidity
Combined posterior + lateralDual-column plating of complex distal humerus fractures (AO/OTA 13C)Separate lateral incision over the lateral epicondyle for the lateral column

Closure. Reattach/realign the triceps split with interrupted absorbable sutures, close the fascia loosely, close the subcutaneous layer and skin, and apply a compressive dressing with an optional posterior long-arm splint for comfort.

Procedures Through This Approach


  • Humeral shaft ORIF β€” the principal operation; mid-distal shaft fractures (especially the distal third) plating with a 4.5mm LC-DCP/LCP.
  • Radial nerve exploration and repair β€” the approach that puts the surgeon directly on the nerve in the spiral groove (primary palsy with no recovery, secondary palsy after manipulation, open fracture, vascular injury).
  • Humeral shaft nonunion revision β€” atrophic nonunions revised with a longer compression plate, bone graft and BMP-2; hypertrophic nonunions with compression or conversion to an intramedullary nail.
  • Pathological humeral shaft fracture β€” tumour excision and reconstruction.
  • Distal humerus fractures (via distal extension) β€” triceps V-Y lengthening or olecranon osteotomy for metaphyseal and intra-articular extension; dual-column plating via the combined posterior + lateral exposure.

Viva & Exam Focus


Mnemonic

SPIRALSPIRAL β€” radial nerve protection in the posterior approach

S
Split triceps
Between the long (medial) and lateral heads β€” not a true internervous plane
P
Proximal identification first
Find the nerve in the spiral groove (~20.7cm above the medial epicondyle, Gerwin 1996)
I
Intermuscular septum crossing
Nerve turns anterior ~10cm above the lateral epicondyle (posterior crossing mean 14.2cm above it)
R
Retract gently only
Vessel loop, atraumatic handling; avoid traction injury
A
Anterior cortex protection
Distal screws must not penetrate where the nerve lies anteriorly
L
Length restoration
Palsy risk rises with fracture shortening and displacement
Mnemonic

HOLSTEINHOLSTEIN β€” recognising the high-alert fracture pattern

H
High-risk pattern
Distal-third humeral shaft fracture
O
Oblique or spiral
Orientation that distinguishes it from a transverse fracture
L
Lateral intermuscular septum
Tethers the nerve so it cannot migrate away from the fracture
S
Spike of bone
Nerve stretched over or trapped by the distal spike
T
Tethered nerve
High-alert for entrapment or stretch at the septum
E
Exploration threshold low
If a secondary palsy develops after manipulation (concern for interposition)
I
Injury mechanism
Traction and entrapment at the septum
N
Name recognition
'Holstein-Lewis' triggers high-risk nerve awareness

Clinical Decision Scenarios

Practise clinical reasoning and management decisions out loud

Viva scenarioAdvanced
Clinical prompt

β€œA 35-year-old motorcyclist has a closed mid-shaft humeral fracture with complete radial nerve palsy (wrist drop, no finger extension, absent first web-space sensation). You are planning posterior-approach ORIF. How do you manage the radial nerve palsy, and what will you do at surgery?”

Viva scenarioAdvanced
Clinical prompt

β€œA 55-year-old diabetic woman has a 9-month atrophic humeral shaft nonunion (no palsy) with 2cm shortening after failed nonoperative management. You plan revision ORIF via the posterior approach with bone grafting. What is your surgical strategy, and what factors contributed to the nonunion?”

Viva scenarioCritical
Clinical prompt

β€œDuring posterior-approach ORIF of a distal-third Holstein-Lewis fracture, you split the triceps, identify the radial nerve in the spiral groove, then extend distally β€” and the nerve 'disappears' from the field. What do you do, and what anatomic principle explains this?”

Radial nerve palsy: when to observe, when to explore

Primary palsy with a closed fracture is managed expectantly β€” high spontaneous recovery (Shao 2005), with exploration reserved for open fractures, vascular injury, a secondary palsy after manipulation, or failure of recovery on serial follow-up and EMG. Persistent palsy beyond 12-18 months is treated with tendon transfers (PT to ECRB for wrist extension, FCR/FCU to EDC for finger extension, PL to a rerouted EPL for thumb extension), with good functional outcomes reported across international series.

Exam day cheat sheet
Posterior approach to the humerus β€” exam-day essentials

Critical anatomy

  • Radial nerve crosses the posterior humerus in the spiral groove medial-to-lateral, a mean 14.2cm above the lateral epicondyle and 20.7cm above the medial epicondyle (Gerwin 1996)
  • It then pierces the lateral intermuscular septum ~10cm above the lateral epicondyle to pass ANTERIORLY (posterior exposure ends here)
  • Accompanied by the profunda brachii artery in the groove (ligatable if injured)
  • NO true internervous plane posteriorly β€” all three triceps heads are radial-nerve territory and the medial head is innervated from the lateral side (Gerwin 1996)

Surgical steps

  • Position: lateral decubitus preferred (arm free-draped, gravity assists retraction)
  • Skin: 10-15cm midline posterior incision centred over the fracture (extensile olecranon-to-acromion)
  • Triceps: split between long (medial) and lateral heads, then the deep medial head β€” no true internervous plane, protect crossing branches
  • Nerve: identify PROXIMALLY first in the spiral groove (mean 20.7cm above the medial epicondyle), trace it distally and subperiosteally
  • Fixation: 4.5mm narrow LC-DCP/LCP, 3-4 cortices (6-8 holes) each side, compression for simple patterns

Indications

  • Humeral shaft fracture with radial nerve palsy (~12%, Shao 2005) β€” direct nerve exploration
  • Mid-distal shaft fractures (posterior preferred over anterolateral for the distal third)
  • Long-segment fixation; open, pathological and vascular-injury fractures; failed nonoperative management
  • Floating elbow, bilateral fractures, polytrauma

Complications

  • Iatrogenic radial nerve injury (2-5%) β€” identify the nerve first, dissect subperiosteally, avoid excess retraction
  • Nonunion (5-10%) β€” risks: inadequate fixation, over-stripping, infection, smoking, distal-third watershed
  • Radial nerve palsy: high spontaneous recovery if primary (Shao 2005: overall 88.1%, 70.7% spontaneous in conservatively treated)
  • Hardware irritation (5-8%); elbow/shoulder stiffness (10-15%) β€” early ROM prevents contracture

Evidence

  • Gausden 2016: 66 fractures, posterior triceps-sparing plating, mean union 15.6 weeks, 3% secondary radial nerve palsy, 82% of primary palsies resolved
  • Shao 2005 (JBJS Br): palsy prevalence 11.8%; overall recovery 88.1%, spontaneous 70.7% in conservatively treated β€” no advantage to early exploration
  • Holstein-Lewis 1963: distal-third spiral/oblique fracture with radial nerve palsy β€” the classic eponym; nerve tethered at the lateral intermuscular septum
  • Gerwin 1996: nerve crosses a mean 14.2cm above the lateral epicondyle (20.7cm above the medial); no true internervous plane posteriorly
  • Streufert 2020 (J Orthop Trauma): iatrogenic palsy similar across approaches (7.1% anterolateral, 11.7% splitting, 17.9% sparing, p=0.11); iatrogenic palsy recovered 95% vs 74% pre-op

Power phrases

  • The radial nerve is the single most critical structure β€” identify it PROXIMALLY first in the spiral groove (mean 14.2cm above the lateral epicondyle, Gerwin 1996) and never lose sight of it
  • A PRIMARY palsy with a closed fracture is managed by observation β€” exploration is reserved for open fractures, vascular injury, secondary palsy after manipulation, or no recovery on serial follow-up
  • The Holstein-Lewis pattern is high-alert β€” the nerve is tethered at the septum; explore early if a SECONDARY palsy develops after manipulation
  • There is NO true internervous plane posteriorly β€” protect the nerve directly (Gerwin 1996)
  • Minimum fixation: 3-4 cortices (6-8 holes) each side; iatrogenic palsy rates are similar across approaches (Streufert 2020) β€” choose the approach for the exposure you need

References


Evidence

Posterior approach plating of humeral shaft fractures β€” clinical outcomes

LoE 4
Gausden EB, Christ AB, Warner SJ, Levack A, Nellestein A, Lorich DG β€’ Arch Orthop Trauma Surg (2016)
Key Findings:
  • Consecutive series of 66 humeral shaft fractures (OTA 12-A/B/C) plated through a posterior, triceps-sparing approach by a single surgeon
  • Mean time to union 15.6 weeks with only one delayed union (high union rate)
  • 17 of 66 (25.8%) presented with a primary radial nerve palsy; 14 of 17 (82%) fully resolved at an average of 31 weeks
  • Only 2 of 66 (3.0%) developed a secondary (iatrogenic) radial nerve palsy
Clinical implication: Posterior plating of humeral shaft fractures achieves high union rates with a low rate of secondary radial nerve palsy, and most primary palsies recover β€” supporting expectant management with direct nerve protection rather than routine acute exploration.
Verify on PubMed (PMID 27744633)
Evidence

Radial nerve course on the posterior humerus β€” operative anatomy

LoE 4
Gerwin M, Hotchkiss RN, Weiland AJ β€’ J Bone Joint Surg Am (1996)
Key Findings:
  • Anatomic study of 10 cadaveric specimens: the radial nerve crosses the posterior humerus from a mean 20.7cm (SD 1.2) proximal to the medial epicondyle to a mean 14.2cm (SD 0.6) proximal to the lateral epicondyle
  • Branches to the lateral head cross the posterior humerus; the medial (deep) head is innervated from the LATERAL side β€” so no true internervous interval exists posteriorly
  • A standard triceps-splitting approach exposed only ~15.4cm of humerus from the lateral epicondyle to the nerve; mobilising the nerve added ~6cm
  • The modified posterior approach (identify the nerve distally, then reflect the lateral and medial heads medially) exposed a mean 26.2cm of the humeral diaphysis
Clinical implication: Identify and protect the radial nerve where it crosses the posterior humerus (~14cm above the lateral epicondyle); for extensile distal exposure use a nerve-protecting modified posterior approach. The 'pure internervous plane' label is anatomically inaccurate.
Verify on PubMed (PMID 8934483)
Evidence

Iatrogenic nerve palsy by surgical approach for humeral shaft fixation

LoE 3
Streufert BD, Eaford I, Sellers TR, Christensen JT, Maxson B, Infante A, Shah AR, Watson DT, Sanders RW, Mir HR β€’ J Orthop Trauma (2020)
Key Findings:
  • Retrospective two-centre study of 261 humeral shaft fractures plated via anterolateral or posterior approaches (2008-2016)
  • Iatrogenic radial nerve palsy in 12.2% overall: 7.1% anterolateral, 11.7% posterior triceps-splitting, 17.9% posterior triceps-sparing (p=0.11, not significant)
  • Iatrogenic palsy recovered far more reliably than preoperative palsy: 95% vs 74% resolution
  • 22% of patients with preoperative palsy required tendon transfer or wrist fusion versus 0% after iatrogenic palsy (p=0.006)
Clinical implication: Iatrogenic radial nerve palsy occurs at statistically similar rates across anterolateral and posterior (splitting vs sparing) approaches β€” approach choice should be driven by exposure needs and nerve protection, not a presumed 'safe' interval. Iatrogenic palsy usually recovers; preoperative palsy more often needs reconstruction.
Verify on PubMed (PMID 31842186)
Evidence

Holstein-Lewis fracture β€” the classic distal-third pattern with radial nerve palsy

LoE 4
Holstein A, Lewis GM β€’ J Bone Joint Surg Am (1963)
Key Findings:
  • Original description of fractures of the distal third of the humeral shaft (spiral/oblique pattern) associated with radial-nerve paralysis β€” the eponymous 'Holstein-Lewis' fracture
  • At this level the radial nerve is relatively tethered as it pierces the lateral intermuscular septum and may be trapped or stretched at the fracture
  • The authors cautioned that closed manipulation of this pattern risks entrapping the nerve, and highlighted the need to consider the nerve when treating these fractures
  • Later evidence (Shao 2005) found transverse/spiral patterns and middle/middle-distal locations most associated with palsy overall β€” the distal-third Holstein-Lewis pattern remains the classic teaching eponym rather than the statistically highest-risk subgroup
Clinical implication: Recognise the Holstein-Lewis pattern (distal-third spiral/oblique fracture with radial nerve palsy) as high-alert: explore early if a palsy develops or worsens AFTER manipulation (secondary palsy), given the risk of nerve entrapment at the lateral intermuscular septum.
Evidence

Radial nerve palsy in humeral shaft fractures β€” systematic review

LoE 1
Shao YC, Harwood P, Grotz MRW, Limb D, Giannoudis PV β€’ J Bone Joint Surg Br (2005)
Key Findings:
  • Systematic review/meta-analysis of 35 eligible papers; overall prevalence of radial nerve palsy 11.8% (532 of 4517 fractures)
  • Middle and middle-distal shaft fractures, and transverse or spiral patterns, were significantly more associated with palsy than other patterns (p less than 0.001)
  • Overall rate of nerve recovery 88.1% (921 of 1045); spontaneous recovery reached 70.7% in patients treated conservatively
  • No significant difference in final outcome between expectant management and early exploration β€” expectant treatment avoids many unnecessary operations
Clinical implication: A primary radial nerve palsy with a closed humeral shaft fracture should usually be managed expectantly β€” most recover and early exploration confers no advantage. Reserve exploration for open fractures, associated vascular injury, secondary palsy after manipulation, or failure of recovery on serial follow-up/EMG.
Verify on PubMed (PMID 16326879)
Editorially reviewed β€” transparent references and correction processPublished by OrthoVellum Medical Education TeamEditorial boardMethodologyReview policy
Educational disclosure

Educational content is reviewed for source visibility, editorial coherence, and correction readiness.

No individual clinician credential is claimed unless a named person is shown.

Verify before clinical use; this is not medical advice or a substitute for local guidance.

Procedure console
20 min
Read
0
Sections
intermediate
Level
Peer-reviewed Β· 2026-06-20
Procedure info
Level
intermediate
Read time
20 min
Updated
2026-06-20
PROCEDURES USING THIS APPROACH
Humeral Shaft Fracture Fixation (Plating vs Nailing)Radial Nerve Exploration
Browse all procedures