Adult Reconstruction

Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty

Surgical technique guide for Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty - FRCS exam preparation

Core Procedure
intermediate
By OrthoVellum Medical Education Team

Reviewed by OrthoVellum Editorial Team

Editorial maintenance, source checking, and correction workflow • Published by OrthoVellum Medical Education Team

High Yield Overview

PRIMARY TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY

Multiple approaches available - posterior (Moore/Southern), direct anterior (DAA), direct lateral (Hardinge), anterolateral (Watson-Jones) | intermediate

Critical Danger Structures - 5 Key Zones

1. Superior Gluteal Nerve

Location: Exits greater sciatic notch 25-40mm proximal to tip of greater trochanter, runs between gluteus medius and minimus

Protection: Stay within 5cm distal to GT tip (safe zone), never extend muscle split proximally beyond this landmark, use anterior-based approach to avoid

2. Sciatic Nerve

Location: Runs 20-30mm posterior to hip joint capsule, posterior to short external rotators (piriformis is key landmark - nerve 2cm posterior)

Protection: Tag external rotators for identification, gentle retraction only, limit retraction time, avoid leg lengthening greater than 4cm

3. Femoral Nerve & Vessels

Location: Lies 40-60mm anterior/medial to acetabulum, within femoral triangle (NAVEL: nerve, artery, vein, empty space, lymphatics)

Protection: Anterior retractors must stay on bone (ilium/acetabular rim), never slide medially into soft tissue, avoid anteroinferior acetabular screws

4. External Iliac Vessels

Location: Run along pelvic brim anteriorly, 15-25mm anterior to anterior acetabular wall, separated by psoas and iliacus muscles

Protection: No screws in anteroinferior quadrant of acetabulum, screws posterosuperior only, medial wall reaming must be controlled to avoid perforation

5. Medial Femoral Circumflex Artery

Location: Runs deep to quadratus femoris muscle, supplies femoral head via retinacular vessels, critical for femoral head viability

Protection: Preserve quadratus femoris when possible, recognize already disrupted in AVN cases, gentle handling of posterior capsule

Mnemonic

CAPSULECAPSULE - Capsular Repair Benefits

Mnemonic

STABLESTABLE - Testing Hip Stability Intraoperatively

Indications for Primary THA

Primary Indications

End-stage Hip Osteoarthritis

  • Primary idiopathic OA (most common in elective setting)
  • Failed conservative management (analgesia, activity modification, physiotherapy)
  • Radiographic evidence: joint space loss, osteophytes, subchondral sclerosis, cysts
  • Pain limiting activities of daily living, night pain, functional disability

Secondary Osteoarthritis

  • Developmental dysplasia of hip (DDH) - complex reconstruction, often requires specialized cups
  • Avascular necrosis - consider THA vs resurfacing in younger patients
  • Post-traumatic arthritis - previous acetabular or femoral fracture
  • Slipped upper femoral epiphysis sequelae
  • Perthes disease sequelae in adults

Inflammatory Arthritis

  • Rheumatoid arthritis - often bilateral, bone quality poor, younger age group
  • Ankylosing spondylitis - fixed spinal deformity affects cup positioning
  • Psoriatic arthritis

Acute Fracture

  • Displaced intracapsular NOF in elderly (>75 years, low demand)
  • THA vs hemiarthroplasty: THA if independent, mobile, good life expectancy

Contraindications

Absolute

  • Active local or systemic infection
  • Inadequate soft tissue coverage
  • Neurogenic arthropathy (Charcot joint) - relative, high failure rate
  • Severe peripheral vascular disease with ischaemic limb

Relative

  • Poor bone stock (severe osteoporosis, prior irradiation)
  • Skeletal immaturity
  • Medical comorbidities precluding surgery
  • Non-compliance with postoperative restrictions
  • Progressive neurological disease affecting lower limb

Preoperative Planning

Templating Requirements

  • Calibrated digital or analogue templating essential
  • Template both AP pelvis and lateral femur
  • Determine cup size, position (restore center of rotation)
  • Determine stem size, neck length, offset
  • Plan for leg length restoration (measure from teardrop to lesser trochanter bilaterally)
  • Identify bone defects requiring augmentation

Australian Context - AOANJRR Data

  • Uncemented cups used in 90% of primary THA
  • Cemented stems in 35%, uncemented 60%, hybrid 5%
  • Ceramic-on-polyethylene most common bearing (40%)
  • Metal-on-polyethylene 35%, ceramic-on-ceramic 15%
  • 10-year revision rate: 6.5% for primary OA

Exam Pearl

AOANJRR Pearl: "In Australia, uncemented acetabular components account for 90% of primary THA. For femoral stems, younger patients (less than 65) typically receive uncemented stems, while cemented stems are preferred in elderly patients greater than 75 years with osteoporotic bone. Hybrid fixation (uncemented cup, cemented stem) is the gold standard for fracture indications."

Exam Viva Scenarios

Practice these scenarios to excel in your viva examination

VIVA SCENARIOStandard

EXAMINER

"A 68-year-old man presents with severe right hip pain limiting his daily activities. Describe your assessment and management plan for primary total hip arthroplasty."

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
I would take a comprehensive approach to this patient. HISTORY: Pain characteristics, functional limitation, failed conservative management, medical comorbidities, medications (anticoagulation), social factors. EXAMINATION: Gait (antalgic, Trendelenburg), ROM (typically restricted internal rotation and flexion), leg length discrepancy, neurovascular status. INVESTIGATIONS: XR AP pelvis and lateral hip (joint space narrowing, osteophytes, sclerosis, cysts confirm OA), consider CT for templating if complex anatomy. PREOPERATIVE PLANNING: Templating to determine component sizes and restore anatomy, medical optimization (anemia correction, diabetic control, smoking cessation), VTE risk assessment. SURGICAL PLAN: Posterior approach (most common in Australia), uncemented cup (90% per AOANJRR) with Lewinnek safe zone positioning, cemented or uncemented stem based on bone quality (cemented in elderly), capsular repair to reduce dislocation. POSTOPERATIVE: Multimodal analgesia, VTE prophylaxis (aspirin or rivaroxaban for 35 days), early mobilization, hip precautions for 6 weeks.
VIVA SCENARIOStandard

EXAMINER

"You are performing a primary THA via posterior approach. Walk me through the key anatomical structures and danger zones you encounter."

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
Starting from superficial to deep: SKIN INCISION: Curved 10-15cm centered on greater trochanter. FASCIA LATA: Incised in line with incision. GLUTEUS MAXIMUS: Split in line with fibers - TRUE internervous plane (dual innervation from superior and inferior gluteal nerves). DANGER 1: Inferior gluteal neurovascular bundle enters proximal gluteus maximus. DEEP LAYER: Short external rotators identified superior to inferior - Piriformis, Superior gemellus, Obturator internus, Inferior gemellus, Quadratus femoris. DANGER 2: Sciatic nerve runs 2cm posterior to piriformis - must protect throughout. I tag each rotator with suture before cutting. DANGER 3: Superior gluteal nerve exits sciatic notch 25-40mm proximal to GT tip - stay greater than 5cm distal to GT. CAPSULE: T-shaped capsulotomy, tag all flaps for later repair. ACETABULUM: Place 3 retractors (anterior, posterior, inferior). DANGER 4: External iliac vessels 15-25mm anterior to anterior wall - no anteroinferior screws. DANGER 5: Femoral nerve 40-60mm anteromedial - anterior retractor stays on bone. POSTERIOR WALL: Protect during reaming - sciatic nerve posteriorly.
VIVA SCENARIOStandard

EXAMINER

"What is the Lewinnek safe zone and why is it important? How do you assess and optimize stability intraoperatively?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
The Lewinnek safe zone describes optimal acetabular component positioning based on Lewinnek's classic study: 40-45° inclination (radiographic angle) and 15-20° anteversion. Cups positioned within this zone have 1.5% dislocation rate compared to 6.1% outside the zone. However, the safe zone is not absolute - it's a guideline. I also consider the COMBINED ANTEVERSION concept: cup anteversion plus stem anteversion should equal 25-45° for optimal stability and impingement-free ROM. INTRAOPERATIVE STABILITY ASSESSMENT: I use the STABLE approach - (1) Trial components before final implants. (2) Test ANTERIOR stability: full extension with 40° external rotation - should remain reduced. (3) Assess POSTERIOR stability: 90° flexion, 40° internal rotation, adduction - should remain reduced. (4) Both directions stable. (5) Leg length assessment: overlap patellae, measure from fixed pelvic point. (6) Examine ROM for impingement. If unstable: I adjust cup position if possible, consider larger head size (36mm preferred over 32mm), adjust neck length to optimize offset and tension, ensure no impingement. Final step is CAPSULAR REPAIR which reduces dislocation 3-4 fold.

Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty - Exam Summary

High-Yield Exam Summary

References

  1. Lewinnek GE, Lewis JL, Tarr R, Compere CL, Zimmerman JR. Dislocations after total hip-replacement arthroplasties. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1978;60(2):217-220. Classic study defining the safe zone for acetabular component positioning (40-45° inclination, 15-20° anteversion) that reduces dislocation rates from 6.1% to 1.5%.

  2. Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry (AOANJRR). Hip, Knee & Shoulder Arthroplasty: 2023 Annual Report. Adelaide: AOA; 2023. Comprehensive registry data showing 90% uncemented cups, 96.5% survival at 5 years, 94% at 10 years for primary THA in Australia.

  3. Kwon MS, Kuskowski M, Mulhall KJ, Macaulay W, Brown TE, Saleh KJ. Does surgical approach affect total hip arthroplasty dislocation rates? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;447:34-38. Systematic review demonstrating posterior approach has 2-5% dislocation rate, reduced to <1% with capsular repair, compared to anterior approach baseline <1%.

  4. Jolles BM, Zangger P, Leyvraz PF. Factors predisposing to dislocation after primary total hip arthroplasty: a multivariate analysis. J Arthroplasty. 2002;17(3):282-288. Multivariate analysis identifying key risk factors: approach, component positioning, soft tissue repair, head size, patient factors (cognitive impairment, prior surgery).

  5. Dorr LD, Malik A, Wan Z, Long WT, Harris M. Precision and bias of imageless computer navigation and surgeon estimates for acetabular component position. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007;465:92-99. Study on acetabular component positioning accuracy showing computer navigation improves precision but Lewinnek safe zone remains goal.

  6. Widmer KH, Zurfluh B. Compliant positioning of total hip components for optimal range of motion. J Orthop Res. 2004;22(4):815-821. Introduced combined anteversion concept: cup anteversion plus stem anteversion should equal 25-45° for optimal stability and impingement-free ROM.

  7. Barrack RL. Dislocation after total hip arthroplasty: implant design and orientation. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2003;11(2):89-99. Comprehensive review of factors affecting stability including component positioning, head size (larger head = greater jump distance), soft tissue repair.

  8. Pellicci PM, Bostrom M, Poss R. Posterior approach to total hip replacement using enhanced posterior soft tissue repair. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1998;355:224-228. Landmark study demonstrating capsular and external rotator repair reduces dislocation from 3-5% to <1% - changed practice globally.

  9. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Total hip replacement and resurfacing arthroplasty for end-stage arthritis of the hip. Technology appraisal guidance [TA304]. London: NICE; 2014. UK guidelines on indications, patient selection, and outcomes for primary THA including cost-effectiveness analysis.

  10. Maloney WJ, Keeney JA. Leg length discrepancy after total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2004;19(4 Suppl 1):108-110. Review of leg length discrepancy causes, prevention strategies (templating, intraoperative measurement), and management options (shoe lift, revision).