Skip to main content
OrthoVellumOrthopaedic Exam Prep
Pricing
About OrthoVellum
OrthoVellum
A living orthopaedic atlas

Exam-focused orthopaedic references, a question bank, viva practice, and spaced-repetition revision — with every clinical claim traceable to its source. Content is educational only and is not a substitute for local supervision, clinical judgement, or institutional policy.


Library

  • Clinical Topics
  • Blog
  • Exam Frequency Index
  • Site Updates
  • Content Methodology

Company

  • About Us
  • Authors & Disclosure
  • Editorial Team
  • Editorial Policy
  • Advertising Policy

Legal

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Medical Disclaimer
  • Copyright & DMCA

Support

  • Support OrthoVellum
  • Help Center
  • Contact
  • Accessibility
Evidence. Clarity. Practice.

© 2026 OrthoVellum. For educational purposes only.

Not medical advice. Verify clinically important information against current local guidance.

Proximal Humeral Endoprosthetic Replacement for Tumour

Operative SurgeryOncology
OncologyAdvancedCore Procedure

Proximal Humeral Endoprosthetic Replacement for Tumour

How to perform a proximal humeral endoprosthetic replacement after wide tumour resection — the deltopectoral or extended exposure step by step, the critical decision to preserve or sacrifice the axillary nerve and deltoid, modular cemented prosthesis with synthetic mesh soft-tissue reconstruction, allograft-prosthetic composite as an alternative, and the functional outcome (stable shoulder, functional hand, limited active elevation). advanced orthopaedic operative-surgery guide.

Procedure console
28 min
Read
0
Sections
advanced
Level
Peer-reviewed · 2026-06-20
High-yield overview

Limb-salvage reconstruction after wide resection of a malignant proximal humeral tumour

Wide marginThe non-negotiable aim
DeltopectoralThe exposure
Axillary nerveThe decision that sets function
Mesh + prosthesisThe reconstruction
Critical Must-Knows
  • The aim is a wide, Enneking-appropriate resection of the tumour with the biopsy tract in continuity, reconstructed with a cemented modular proximal humeral endoprosthesis. The margin is the cure — never compromise it for the sake of the reconstruction.
  • The single biggest determinant of shoulder function is whether the axillary nerve and deltoid can be preserved. Preserve them and the patient may regain useful active elevation; sacrifice them and the shoulder becomes stable and painless but active abduction is lost — yet the hand and elbow remain fully functional.
  • Stability and any useful motion come from the soft tissues, not the metal. The capsule, residual rotator cuff and deltoid are reconstructed to the prosthesis with a synthetic mesh (Trevira or Dacron) sleeve; a reverse or constrained design is reserved for instability that soft-tissue reconstruction cannot solve.
  • Through the deltopectoral approach identify and protect the axillary nerve in the quadrilateral space, ligate the anterior and posterior circumflex humeral arteries, and guard the radial nerve in the spiral groove at the osteotomy.
  • An allograft-prosthetic composite (APC) is the main alternative — it restores biological bone stock and a cuff or deltoid attachment for better potential stability and rotator function, at the cost of allograft nonunion, fracture and infection.

When & Why


Indication. A malignant tumour of the proximal humerus where limb salvage is appropriate and a wide margin is achievable: a high-grade primary sarcoma (osteosarcoma, Ewing sarcoma, chondrosarcoma) is the classic indication; selected solitary metastases or myeloma deposits with a favourable prognosis, and painful destructive metastases with impending fracture, are also reconstructed this way. The proximal humeral metaphysis is the most common away-from-the-knee site and the third most common site overall for primary bone sarcoma. Before the knife — staging sets the plan. A wide resection is only chosen after the tumour is fully defined: - MRI of the whole humerus — local extent, epiphyseal and joint involvement, extraosseous extension, the relationship to the axillary nerve in the quadrilateral space and to the deltoid, and skip lesions in the marrow.

  • Systemic staging — CT chest and a bone scan or whole-body MRI/PET for metastases (and local staging of a sarcoma).
  • Biopsy — image-guided, taken along the future resection route so the tract is excised en bloc; plan the definitive incision before the biopsy is done. The one decision that matters — can the abductor mechanism be saved? Read off the MRI whether the tumour respects the axillary nerve and deltoid. If it does, an abductor-sparing resection is possible and function is preserved. If the nerve or deltoid is involved, both are sacrificed with the specimen and active abduction is lost. This single decision sets the resection type, the reconstruction, and the result you counsel the patient to expect.
Modular endoprosthesis (EPR)

The default. Cemented modular stem and proximal body; mechanically reliable, immediate stability, simple and quick. No biological attachment — function is capped by whatever rotator cuff and deltoid remain, so stability depends on the mesh soft-tissue reconstruction.

Allograft-prosthetic composite (APC)

A bulk allograft sleeves a prosthesis, restoring bone stock and a biological cuff and deltoid attachment for better potential stability and rotator function. The trade-off is allograft nonunion, fracture and infection.

Arthrodesis / other

Glenohumeral arthrodesis (or an osteoarticular allograft) for the young patient who wants power and stability over motion; rotationplasty is reserved for very extensive tumours in a child where length and growth must be preserved.

Consent specifically for instability or dislocation (the commonest problem), infection, nerve deficit (axillary, radial or musculocutaneous), limited active elevation, local recurrence, possible revision or amputation, allograft-specific risks if an APC is used, and lifelong surveillance. Setup. Beach-chair (or supine with a scapular bump), the arm free and draped to allow circumduction so the osteotomy and soft tissues can be reached. A tourniquet is usually avoided because proximal control of the axillary vessels is needed; the arm is exsanguinated only if a tourniquet is used. General anaesthesia with a regional block for postoperative pain, a cell saver on the field, antibiotics at induction, and an image intensifier available to confirm the osteotomy level and cementing.

The Operation


The goal: remove the tumour with a wide margin and the biopsy tract in continuity, then reconstruct the proximal humerus with a cemented modular endoprosthesis and a mesh soft-tissue sleeve that gives the shoulder its stability. The exposure is laid out in full below (and in depth on the deltopectoral approach page) — the first steps are the approach, then the resection, then the reconstruction.

Operative sequence

Step 1Position, plan and landmarks
  • Beach chair, arm free; mark the biopsy tract (to be excised en bloc), the deltopectoral groove, the coracoid process, the clavicle and acromion, and the planned osteotomy level distal to the tumour.
  • Design one incision that ellipses the biopsy tract and opens directly onto the tumour's deep margin, with room to extend proximally onto the clavicle and distally down the shaft.
Step 2Incision — deltopectoral, extended
  • A long deltopectoral or anterolateral incision that excises the biopsy tract in continuity with the specimen.
  • Extend proximally along the anterior acromion and clavicle and distally along the humeral shaft as the resection demands; the incision is the single corridor for exposure, resection and reconstruction.
Step 3Superficial dissection — the deltopectoral interval
  • Develop the internervous plane between deltoid (axillary nerve) and pectoralis major (medial and lateral pectoral nerves), retracting the cephalic vein — usually laterally with the deltoid.
  • Open the clavipectoral fascia, expose the coracoid process and the conjoined tendon (short head of biceps and coracobrachialis), and retract them medially.
Step 4Neurovascular control — and the axillary nerve decision
  • Define the axillary artery and vein and the cords of the brachial plexus; protect the musculocutaneous nerve as it passes lateral to the coracoid.
  • Ligate the anterior and posterior circumflex humeral arteries.
  • Identify the axillary nerve in the quadrilateral space, running with the posterior circumflex humeral artery. As planned from the MRI: if the tumour respects the nerve, preserve it (and the deltoid) for an abductor-sparing resection; if it is involved or threatened, sacrifice it en bloc with the specimen.
Step 5Define the osteotomy level
  • Release the pectoralis major from the lateral lip of the bicipital groove, and the latissimus dorsi and teres major insertions, as the margin requires.
  • Mark the humeral osteotomy 3 to 5 cm beyond the distal tumour extent as measured on MRI, and confirm the level with the image intensifier.
  • Protect the radial nerve in the spiral groove posteriorly and make the cut from anterior to posterior so the nerve is never levered upon.
Step 6Resection — en bloc, with the joint decision
  • For an intra-articular resection (joint uninvolved): open the capsule, divide the rotator cuff at the required margin, and deliver the proximal humerus with the attached soft tissues.
  • For an extra-articular resection (joint or extraosseous extension): take the glenoid and capsule en bloc with the specimen, often through a second posterior incision — the choice is dictated entirely by tumour extension, not by ease.
  • Remove the specimen with the biopsy tract in continuity, measure the resection length and the defect, and send margins for histology.
Step 7Trial and prepare the shaft
  • Ream and prepare the remaining humeral diaphysis to accept the cemented stem.
  • Trial the modular body segment and head to restore humeral length and retrotorsion, matching the resection length to the contralateral side.
Step 8Cement the modular endoprosthesis
  • Cement the stem into the diaphysis with modern cementing technique, restrictors and pressurisation.
  • Assemble the modular body segment and proximal humeral component, restoring length and retrotorsion so the soft tissues tension correctly.
Step 9Soft-tissue reconstruction — the functional step
  • Fashion a synthetic mesh (Trevira or Dacron) sleeve around the proximal body to reconstruct the glenohumeral capsule.
  • Reattach the residual rotator cuff and the deltoid (where preserved) to the mesh and prosthesis with non-absorbable sutures; advance and reattach pectoralis major onto the prosthesis for anterior cover and stability.
  • If the deltoid was sacrificed, reconstruct a tensioned mesh sleeve to cradle the head for stability and accept poor active abduction. Reserve a constrained or reverse design for instability that meticulous soft-tissue work cannot control.
Step 10Closure and immobilisation
  • Layered closure over drains; achieve a stable, well-covered soft-tissue envelope — this is what keeps the prosthesis reduced.
  • Immobilise in a shoulder immobiliser or sling, the arm in slight abduction and neutral rotation, protecting the reconstruction while the soft tissues heal.
The two nerves that make or break the case — axillary and radial

The axillary nerve passes posteriorly through the quadrilateral space with the posterior circumflex humeral artery, deep to the deltoid; the radial nerve winds the spiral groove on the posterior humeral shaft and is at the osteotomy's mercy. Identify both before any bone cut. Protect the axillary nerve if it is to be spared, and make the humeral osteotomy from anterior to posterior with a retractor guarding the radial nerve in the groove. Never lever on the shaft, and never proceed without proximal control of the axillary vessels.

Function follows the nerve, not the metal

Preserve the deltoid and axillary nerve and the patient keeps useful active elevation; sacrifice them and you trade active abduction for a stable, painless shoulder — but the hand and elbow stay fully functional. The single sentence a viva examiner wants is: a stable shoulder, a functional hand, and limited active elevation.

Stability is a soft-tissue problem

Instability is the commonest failure of a proximal humeral endoprosthesis, and it is driven entirely by soft-tissue deficiency, not by the implant geometry. Hence the mesh capsule, the pectoralis advancement, and postoperative immobilisation. Reconstruct the soft tissues as meticulously as the bone, or the head will dislocate.

Aftercare & Complications


Rehabilitation | Phase | Timing | Immobilisation | Therapy | |-------|--------|----------------|---------| | 1 | 0 to 2 weeks | Shoulder immobiliser or sling | Active hand, wrist and elbow from day 1; gentle pendulums | | 2 | 2 to 6 weeks | Sling, removed for exercise | Assisted shoulder motion where the cuff and deltoid were reconstructed; protect abduction if the deltoid was sacrificed | | 3 | 6 to 12 weeks | Sling for comfort only | Progressive active motion and light activities of daily living | | 4 | 3 to 6 months | None | Graded strengthening (limited where the abductor mechanism was sacrificed) | Functional outcome tracks abductor preservation. With the deltoid and axillary nerve preserved, most patients regain useful assisted and some active elevation; when they are sacrificed, the result is a stable, painless shoulder with MSTS scores in the region of 50 to 70 per cent of normal, a fully functional hand and elbow, and little active abduction. Aseptic loosening and implant survivorship are favourable at ten years in modern modular series, with instability and infection the dominant reasons for revision. Complications

Instability or dislocation
Recognition
Pain, deformity, loss of contour; confirmed on radiograph
Prevention
Meticulous mesh capsule and pectoralis advancement; postoperative immobilisation
Management
Closed or open reduction; revision soft-tissue reconstruction; constrained or reverse prosthesis for recurrence
Infection
Recognition
Wound breakdown, persistent drainage, pain, raised inflammatory markers
Prevention
Prophylactic antibiotics, meticulous soft-tissue cover, minimise dead space
Management
Debridement and antibiotics; single- or two-stage exchange; rarely amputation
Nerve deficit (axillary, radial, musculocutaneous)
Recognition
Weakness or numbness in the relevant distribution
Prevention
Identify and protect nerves before bone cuts; osteotomy anterior to posterior
Management
Observation for neuropraxia; explore a palsy in continuity with no recovery; directed therapy
Local recurrence
Recognition
New pain or mass; confirmed on MRI and biopsy
Prevention
A wide margin at the index operation — never compromise for reconstruction
Management
Wide re-resection or amputation; oncology review for further treatment
Aseptic loosening or implant failure
Recognition
Pain on loading; radiographic lucency or component migration
Prevention
Modern cementing technique; restored length and version for balanced soft-tissue tension
Management
Revision of the loose component; revision megaprosthesis
Periprosthetic fracture
Recognition
Pain and deformity after a fall or torque; radiograph around the stem
Prevention
Adequate diaphyseal cement fixation; protect from falls early
Management
Internal fixation or stem revision depending on level and stability
Wound breakdown or skin necrosis
Recognition
Edge necrosis or exposed mesh and implant
Prevention
Tension-free closure, pliable flaps, avoid a thin bridge over the prosthesis
Management
Local wound care; plastic surgical cover (flap) for exposed hardware
Complications — recognition, prevention, management
ComplicationRecognitionPreventionManagement
Instability or dislocationPain, deformity, loss of contour; confirmed on radiographMeticulous mesh capsule and pectoralis advancement; postoperative immobilisationClosed or open reduction; revision soft-tissue reconstruction; constrained or reverse prosthesis for recurrence
InfectionWound breakdown, persistent drainage, pain, raised inflammatory markersProphylactic antibiotics, meticulous soft-tissue cover, minimise dead spaceDebridement and antibiotics; single- or two-stage exchange; rarely amputation
Nerve deficit (axillary, radial, musculocutaneous)Weakness or numbness in the relevant distributionIdentify and protect nerves before bone cuts; osteotomy anterior to posteriorObservation for neuropraxia; explore a palsy in continuity with no recovery; directed therapy
Local recurrenceNew pain or mass; confirmed on MRI and biopsyA wide margin at the index operation — never compromise for reconstructionWide re-resection or amputation; oncology review for further treatment
Aseptic loosening or implant failurePain on loading; radiographic lucency or component migrationModern cementing technique; restored length and version for balanced soft-tissue tensionRevision of the loose component; revision megaprosthesis
Periprosthetic fracturePain and deformity after a fall or torque; radiograph around the stemAdequate diaphyseal cement fixation; protect from falls earlyInternal fixation or stem revision depending on level and stability
Wound breakdown or skin necrosisEdge necrosis or exposed mesh and implantTension-free closure, pliable flaps, avoid a thin bridge over the prosthesisLocal wound care; plastic surgical cover (flap) for exposed hardware

Viva & Exam Focus


Mnemonic

DELTOIDDELTOID — order of the operation

D
Deltoid–axillary nerve decision
The single biggest determinant of function — preserve or sacrifice
E
En-bloc excision
Biopsy tract in continuity, with a wide Enneking margin
L
Ligate circumflex humeral arteries
Anterior and posterior — take proximal control of the axillary vessels
T
Tuberosity, cuff and capsule reconstruction
A mesh sleeve — the soft tissues give stability
O
Osteotomy wide of tumour
3 to 5 cm beyond the MRI extent; confirm with the intensifier
I
Implant
Cemented modular proximal humeral endoprosthesis
D
Defend the radial nerve
In the spiral groove at the osteotomy

Clinical Decision Scenarios

Practise clinical reasoning and management decisions out loud

Viva scenarioStandard
Clinical prompt

“A 19-year-old has a high-grade osteosarcoma of the proximal humerus. Describe your approach to a wide resection and the principles of reconstruction.”

Viva scenarioAdvanced
Clinical prompt

“The tumour involves the deltoid and the axillary nerve must be sacrificed. What functional result do you counsel the patient to expect, and how do you reconstruct for it?”

Exam day cheat sheet
Proximal Humeral Endoprosthetic Replacement — exam-day essentials

Indication

  • High-grade primary sarcoma (or selected metastasis) of the proximal humerus where limb salvage is appropriate and a wide margin is achievable
  • Proximal humerus is the most common away-from-the-knee site of bone sarcoma

Staging and the key decision

  • MRI (local extent, joint, neurovascular, deltoid), CT chest, biopsy along the resection route
  • The decision: preserve or sacrifice the axillary nerve and deltoid — it sets function

Exposure

  • Deltopectoral or extended approach
  • Protect the axillary, radial and musculocutaneous nerves; ligate the circumflex humeral arteries

Resection

  • Wide margin, biopsy tract in continuity, osteotomy 3 to 5 cm beyond tumour
  • Intra-articular unless joint extension demands an extra-articular specimen

Reconstruction

  • Cemented modular endoprosthesis with a mesh soft-tissue sleeve
  • Allograft-prosthetic composite is the main alternative
  • Constrained or reverse design only for instability

Outcome

  • Function tracks deltoid and axillary preservation
  • Stable shoulder, functional hand, limited active elevation
  • Instability is the commonest complication

Background & Evidence


Epidemiology. The proximal humeral metaphysis is the most common site of primary bone sarcoma away from the knee and the third most common overall, after the distal femur and proximal tibia. Osteosarcoma and Ewing sarcoma dominate in adolescents and young adults; chondrosarcoma, metastatic carcinoma (breast, renal, thyroid, lung, prostate) and myeloma are the lesions of older adults. The same modular reconstruction is used for selected metastatic deposits with a reasonable prognosis and for impending pathological fracture. Pathoanatomy. Tumours arise in the proximal metaphysis and extend into the epiphysis (once the physis closes), the greater and lesser tuberosities, the rotator cuff and deltoid attachments, and along the medullary canal. Three relationships decide the operation: involvement of the glenohumeral joint (intra-articular versus extra-articular resection); involvement of the deltoid and the axillary nerve in the quadrilateral space (abductor-sparing versus abductor-sacrificing); and distal marrow extension (the osteotomy level). The anterior and posterior circumflex humeral arteries are ligated; the axillary artery and vein and the brachial plexus lie proximal and must be controlled before any resection.

I
Capsule and joint
Intra-articular
Abductor (deltoid plus axillary nerve)
Preserved
Expected function
Best — useful active abduction possible
II
Capsule and joint
Intra-articular
Abductor (deltoid plus axillary nerve)
Sacrificed
Expected function
Stable and painless; poor active abduction
III
Capsule and joint
Extra-articular (glenoid en bloc)
Abductor (deltoid plus axillary nerve)
Preserved
Expected function
Useful abduction possible if cuff and deltoid are reconstructed
IV
Capsule and joint
Extra-articular
Abductor (deltoid plus axillary nerve)
Sacrificed
Expected function
Stable; minimal active abduction
Total humeral resection
Capsule and joint
Glenohumeral joint and elbow both reconstructed
Abductor (deltoid plus axillary nerve)
Variable
Expected function
Functional hand; elbow via a hinged prosthesis
Resection types after Malawer (proximal humerus)
TypeCapsule and jointAbductor (deltoid plus axillary nerve)Expected function
IIntra-articularPreservedBest — useful active abduction possible
IIIntra-articularSacrificedStable and painless; poor active abduction
IIIExtra-articular (glenoid en bloc)PreservedUseful abduction possible if cuff and deltoid are reconstructed
IVExtra-articularSacrificedStable; minimal active abduction
Total humeral resectionGlenohumeral joint and elbow both reconstructedVariableFunctional hand; elbow via a hinged prosthesis

The type is dictated by tumour extent on MRI, not by the surgeon's preference, and the overriding principle is that expected function is governed by abductor preservation — the axis that runs down the right-hand column of this table. Key evidence. Enneking's Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) system standardised how function is reported after limb-salvage reconstruction and is the metric used in every series below. The consistent message from the proximal humeral literature is that a modular endoprosthesis is a durable reconstruction whose function is set by the axillary nerve and deltoid, and whose dominant mode of failure is instability — a soft-tissue problem that mesh reconstruction and pectoralis advancement are designed to prevent. Allograft-prosthetic composites improve the biological attachment available to the cuff and deltoid but bring allograft-specific risks.

References


Evidence

A system for the functional evaluation of reconstructive procedures after surgical treatment of tumors of the musculoskeletal system

Enneking WF, Dunham W, Gebhardt MC, Malawar MM, Pritchard DJ • Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research (1993)
Key Findings:
  • The MSTS functional scoring system for limb-salvage reconstruction — the standard metric used to report outcome after proximal humeral endoprosthetic replacement.
  • Scores pain, function, emotional acceptance and limb-specific parameters, enabling comparison across reconstruction types.
Evidence

Dislocation of the proximal humeral endoprosthetic replacement

Kumar D, Grimer RJ, Abudu A, Carter SR, Tillman RM • Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (British) (2003)
Key Findings:
  • Instability and dislocation are the commonest mode of failure of a proximal humeral endoprosthesis.
  • Risk tracks the extent of rotator cuff and deltoid sacrifice, making meticulous soft-tissue reconstruction the key to prevention.
Evidence

Endoprosthetic reconstruction for malignant tumors of the proximal humerus

Asavamongkolkul A, Eckardt JJ, Kabo JM, Ward WG, Kelly CM, Wirganowicz PZ • Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research (2000)
Key Findings:
  • Modular endoprosthetic reconstruction of the proximal humerus is durable and reliable for limb salvage.
  • Functional outcome is governed by preservation of the deltoid and axillary nerve; active elevation is limited when the abductor mechanism is sacrificed.
Evidence

Reconstruction of the proximal humerus after tumour resection — endoprosthesis versus allograft-prosthetic composite

Capanna R, Campanacci DA, Beltrami G, Scoccianti G, Frenos F • Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (British) (2007)
Key Findings:
  • An allograft-prosthetic composite restores biological bone stock and a cuff and deltoid attachment for better potential stability and rotator function than a prosthesis alone.
  • The trade-off is allograft-specific morbidity — nonunion, fracture and infection.
Editorially reviewed — transparent references and correction processPublished by OrthoVellum Medical Education TeamEditorial boardMethodologyReview policy
Educational disclosure

Educational content is reviewed for source visibility, editorial coherence, and correction readiness.

No individual clinician credential is claimed unless a named person is shown.

Verify before clinical use; this is not medical advice or a substitute for local guidance.

Procedure console
28 min
Read
0
Sections
advanced
Level
Peer-reviewed · 2026-06-20
Procedure info
Level
advanced
Read time
28 min
Updated
2026-06-20
SURGICAL APPROACHES USED
Deltopectoral Approach to Shoulder
Browse all procedures