Retrograde Superior Pubic Ramus Screw Fixation

TraumaAdvancedCore Procedure

Retrograde Superior Pubic Ramus Screw Fixation

Surgical technique for percutaneous retrograde medullary superior pubic ramus screw fixation of anterior pelvic ring injuries - corridor planning, multiplanar fluoroscopy, danger structures and combined ring fixation

High-yield overview

Percutaneous retrograde medullary screw fixation of the superior pubic ramus for selected anterior pelvic ring injuries | advanced

Surgical Imaging

Retrograde superior pubic ramus screw
Percutaneous retrograde superior pubic ramus screw stabilising an anterior pelvic ring injury, passed from the pubic body along the bony ramus corridor.Credit: AI-generated medical illustration Β· OrthoVellum
Critical Danger Structures and Exam Traps
Corona Mortis β€” The Silent Bleeder

The structure: an aberrant arterial and venous anastomosis between the inferior epigastric or external iliac system and the obturator system that crosses the superior pubic ramus around 6 cm lateral to the symphysis.

The risk: it lies directly in the field of the pubic entry and any anterior exposure. Division or avulsion causes brisk bleeding that is difficult to control because the vessel retracts above and below the ramus.

External Iliac Vessels β€” Superior Exit

The location: the external iliac artery and vein run along the pelvic brim on the medial border of psoas, just superior and posterior to the lateral superior ramus.

The risk: a guide wire or screw that exits the superior cortex of the lateral ramus can injure these vessels. The artery lies lateral to the vein. The outlet view is the safeguard that keeps the wire contained within the ramus.

Obturator Bundle and Bladder β€” Inferior and Posterior Exit

The obturator vessels and nerve: run in the obturator canal beneath the superior ramus. An inferior wire exit threatens the obturator artery, vein and nerve.

The bladder: lies immediately behind the pubic symphysis and superior ramus. A posterior or superior perforation from the pubis can injure it. A preoperative Foley catheter decompresses the bladder and moves it out of the corridor.

Spermatic Cord and Round Ligament β€” The Entry

The structure: the spermatic cord in males and the round ligament in females emerge through the superficial inguinal ring, just superior and lateral to the pubic tubercle.

The risk: the retrograde entry incision over the pubic body sits directly beneath these structures. A blind stab incision can transect them. Use a small incision and blunt dissection to the pubic body, protecting the contents of the ring superiorly.

Acetabulum and Hip Joint β€” Lateral Penetration

The trap: the acetabulum forms the lateral boundary of the corridor. A wire that drifts too lateral or posterior enters the hip joint or penetrates the acetabular cartilage.

The safeguard: the iliac oblique view profiles the posterior column and acetabulum and is used to confirm the screw stays extra-articular. Joint penetration may be clinically silent initially but causes early hip pain, chondral injury or sepsis if missed.

Reduction First β€” The Core Principle

The trap: surgeons assume the intramedullary screw will reduce the fracture as it crosses it. It will not. A screw driven across a malreduced ramus simply fixes it in a displaced position.

The fix: reduce the ramus anatomically first using closed manipulation, a percutaneous Schanz pin joystick, a pelvic reduction clamp or an external fixator. Only then advance the wire and place the screw to maintain the reduction that has been obtained.

Mnemonic

C.O.R.R.I.D.O.RCORRIDOR β€” Retrograde Ramus Screw Technique

Mnemonic

D.A.N.G.E.RDANGER β€” Six Structures of the Ramus

Mnemonic

V.I.E.W.SVIEWS β€” Fluoroscopy Before You Prep

Surgical Indications

Indications

The retrograde superior pubic ramus screw is used to stabilise selected anterior pelvic ring injuries as part of an overall pelvic ring reconstruction. It is a fixation strategy, not a treatment in isolation β€” the decision to fix the anterior ring follows from the mechanical stability of the whole injury.

  • Displaced superior pubic ramus fractures that are unstable or part of a rotationally or vertically unstable pelvic ring pattern (lateral compression type II or III, anteroposterior compression type II or III, vertical shear)
  • Parasymphyseal fractures and ramus fractures extending into the pubic root where an intramedullary screw can bridge and stabilise the anterior column
  • Tilting fractures of the pubic root in osteoporotic bone, where a medullary screw gives better purchase than a plate
  • Selected symphyseal and parasymphyseal disruptions where a medullary ramus screw supplements or substitutes for symphyseal plating
  • Bilateral ramus fractures with an intact posterior ring but an unstable anterior segment, particularly in the elderly
  • Fragility fractures of the anterior pelvic ring in geriatric patients who are fit for a short percutaneous procedure but not a large open exposure

Relative Indications

  • Ramus fractures with a displaced posterior ring injury that will be fixed posteriorly, where fixing the anterior ring restores the complete ring
  • Patients in whom an open anterior exposure is undesirable (contaminated or severely swollen anterior soft tissues, prior Pfannenstiel surgery, obese patient in whom a percutaneous route avoids a large wound)
  • Polytrauma patients requiring minimal additional surgical insult once positioned supine for another procedure

Contraindications

Absolute:

  • A destroyed or absent medullary ramus corridor (severe comminution of the ramus, large bone defects) in which a screw cannot be contained
  • Inability to obtain adequate multiplanar fluoroscopy
  • Active infection at the intended entry site
  • An unreduced ramus fracture that cannot be reduced closed or percutaneously and where an open reduction is therefore required

Relative:

  • Severe osteoporosis where screw purchase in the supra-acetabular bone is expected to be poor
  • Marked obesity or abundant bowel gas that degrades fluoroscopy
  • A very narrow ramus corridor on CT that will not accept a screw even of the smallest practical calibre
  • Surgeon inexperience with percutaneous pelvic fixation without intraoperative navigation support

Evidence for Percutaneous versus Open Anterior Fixation

Rationale for the Retrograde Ramus Screw

Open plating of the anterior pelvic ring through a Pfannenstiel or extended ilioinguinal exposure provides strong fixation and allows direct reduction but carries the morbidity of a large anterior wound: blood loss from the corona mortis and iliac vessels, infection, hernia and wound complications. The retrograde medullary ramus screw was introduced to provide stable intramedullary fixation of the ramus through a percutaneous route, avoiding the anterior exposure. In biomechanical terms the intramedullary screw lies on the neutral axis of the ramus and resists bending in the plane of greatest deformation, behaving as a load-sharing implant.

When Each Strategy Wins

The retrograde ramus screw is best suited to a displaced but reconstructable ramus fracture with an intact medullary corridor. Open anterior plating is preferred when the ramus is severely comminuted, when the corridor is destroyed, when an open reduction of the anterior ring is required, or when a symphyseal disruption needs formal plate fixation. The two strategies are not mutually exclusive: a parasymphyseal fracture with symphyseal disruption may be plated at the symphysis while the ramus component is stabilised with a medullary screw.

The Corridor Is Everything

The single most important determinant of whether a percutaneous screw can be used is whether the ramus corridor exists and will accept a screw. Preoperative CT with three-dimensional reconstruction is used to confirm the corridor, measure its narrowest diameter and plan the screw trajectory. A corridor that tapers below the diameter of the smallest practical screw is a contraindication.

Retrograde Ramus Screw versus Open Anterior Plating


Evidence for Combined Ring Fixation

Pelvic ring stability is a function of the whole ring. An anterior injury is rarely the only lesion in an unstable pattern: lateral compression and anteroposterior compression injuries almost always involve both the anterior and posterior ring. Fixing the anterior ring alone in a vertically or rotationally unstable injury risks late displacement. The retrograde ramus screw is therefore usually combined with posterior ring fixation β€” sacroiliac or iliosacral screws for sacroiliac joint and sacral injuries, and lumbopelvic fixation for highly unstable patterns. Restoration of both the anterior and posterior columns is the goal.


Clinical Decision Scenarios

Practise clinical reasoning and management decisions out loud

Viva scenarioAdvanced
Clinical prompt

β€œA 34-year-old man is involved in a high-speed motor vehicle collision. Pelvic CT shows a displaced right superior pubic ramus fracture with a right sacral fracture and anterior widening of the right sacroiliac joint β€” a rotationally and vertically unstable pelvic ring injury. He is now haemodynamically stable. Describe your management, with particular reference to the anterior ring.”

Practical approach
This is an unstable pelvic ring injury involving both the anterior and posterior columns. Management is staged and begins with resuscitation, proceeds to definitive reconstruction of the whole ring, and addresses the anterior ring specifically. **Initial management**: ATLS principles. The pelvic binder is kept in place for temporary stabilisation if it was applied. A Foley catheter is inserted to decompress the bladder, monitor resuscitation and move the bladder off the posterior symphysis. Deep vein thrombosis prophylaxis is commenced once the patient is stable. **Definitive planning**: a CT with three-dimensional reconstruction confirms the pattern and, critically, is used to confirm the right superior pubic ramus corridor exists and will accept a screw. The trajectory is rehearsed preoperatively. I confirm that the inlet, outlet, obturator oblique and iliac oblique views will be obtainable. **Operative sequence**: the posterior ring is reduced and fixed first β€” iliosacral screw fixation of the sacral fracture and sacroiliac joint, restoring the overall template. The anterior ring is then addressed. The ramus is reduced first using closed manipulation and, if needed, a percutaneous clamp or joystick, confirmed on inlet and outlet views. Only once reduced do I place a retrograde medullary screw from an entry on the pubic body, driving the wire under live fluoroscopy down the corridor on the obturator oblique outlet view, with the inlet controlling depth, the outlet confirming containment, and the iliac oblique excluding the hip joint. A 7.3 mm cannulated screw of appropriate length is placed. **Dangers I explicitly protect**: the corona mortis and external iliac vessels (superior exit), the obturator bundle (inferior exit), the bladder (posterior exit, hence the Foley), the spermatic cord at the entry, and the acetabulum and hip joint (lateral penetration, checked on the iliac oblique). **Post-operative**: protected weight bearing dictated by the overall injury, chemical thromboprophylaxis, and inlet and outlet radiographs at 2, 6 and 12 weeks.
Viva scenarioAdvanced
Clinical prompt

β€œYou are placing a retrograde right superior pubic ramus screw. The wire is advancing well on the obturator oblique outlet view, but on the outlet view you notice the wire has begun to drift toward the superior cortex of the lateral ramus. What is the significance, what structures are at risk, and what do you do next?”

Practical approach
A wire drifting toward the superior cortex of the lateral ramus is the warning sign of impending superior exit, which is the most dangerous direction of perforation in this procedure because the external iliac artery and vein run immediately superior and posterior to the lateral ramus along the pelvic brim. The corona mortis may also be in the field more medially. **Significance**: the outlet view is the safeguard that keeps the wire contained within the ramus in the superoinferior plane. Loss of containment superiorly means the wire is about to leave bone and enter the zone of the external iliac vessels. This is not a position to continue advancing. **Structures at risk**: the external iliac artery and vein, with the artery lying lateral to the vein; potentially the corona mortis more medially. Injury produces brisk, potentially exsanguinating haemorrhage that is difficult to control because the vessels are above the brim. **What I do next**: I stop advancing immediately. I withdraw the wire back into safe bone and reassess on all four views, particularly the outlet and the inlet, to understand why the wire drifted β€” usually the entry point or the trajectory in the transverse plane was slightly off, or the ramus is curved and the wire has taken the wrong line. I reposition the wire to run down the centre of the ramus on the obturator oblique outlet view, confirming containment on the outlet before advancing again. I keep the C-arm on the outlet view as I approach the lateral ramus. **If there is any haemodynamic change or sign of bleeding**: I do not withdraw the wire blindly (it may be tamponading a vessel), I alert the anaesthetist, prepare for vascular control, call vascular surgery, and convert to an open approach through an anterior incision to gain proximal and distal control of the external iliac vessels. **Prevention**: preoperative CT corridor planning, rehearsing the trajectory, and live multiplanar fluoroscopy with the outlet view as the containment check throughout.
Viva scenarioAdvanced
Clinical prompt

β€œAn 82-year-old woman sustained a low-energy fall three weeks ago and has a displaced left superior pubic ramus fracture. She remains in severe pain and is unable to mobilise despite analgesia and protected weight bearing. CT shows the ramus is displaced but the medullary corridor is preserved. How do you decide whether to fix this, and if so how?”

Practical approach
This is a fragility fracture of the anterior pelvic ring that has failed non-operative management: the patient is in severe pain and unable to mobilise at three weeks. In this context surgical stabilisation is reasonable, and a retrograde medullary ramus screw is well suited because it is a short, supine, percutaneous procedure that avoids a large anterior exposure in a frail patient. **Decision-making**: I weigh the benefit of stabilisation and earlier mobilisation against the risks of surgery and anaesthesia in an 82-year-old. The fact that the medullary corridor is preserved on CT is the key enabler β€” it means a percutaneous screw is technically feasible. I assess bone quality on the CT; severe osteoporosis is a relative contraindication because of poor screw hold, but does not automatically preclude a medullary screw, which often grips osteoporotic ramus bone better than a plate. I confirm that the inlet, outlet, obturator oblique and iliac oblique views will be obtainable. **Operative plan**: supine, radiolucent table, Foley catheter. The ramus is reduced first β€” in a geriatric, low-energy injury, closed manipulation or a percutaneous clamp often suffices, confirmed on inlet and outlet views. A retrograde medullary screw is placed from a pubic entry, driven down the corridor on the obturator oblique outlet view, with the inlet controlling depth, the outlet confirming containment, and the iliac oblique excluding the hip joint. A calibre and length chosen to suit the corridor β€” often a 7.3 mm or 6.5 mm screw β€” is used. **Same dangers apply**: the corona mortis, external iliac and obturator vessels, the bladder, the spermatic cord or round ligament at the entry, and the acetabulum and hip joint. The patient's thinner tissues and smaller anatomy make careful blunt dissection at the entry important. **Post-operative**: protected weight bearing initially, early mobilisation with physiotherapy, aggressive osteoporosis treatment, and deep vein thrombosis prophylaxis. The goal of surgery here is pain relief and mobilisation as much as radiographic union. **Counselling**: I set realistic expectations β€” the aim is to relieve pain and get her mobilising, understanding that fixation in osteoporotic bone carries a risk of settling and that osteoporosis treatment is central to preventing further fragility fractures.
Exam day cheat sheet
Retrograde Superior Pubic Ramus Screw Fixation β€” exam day summary

References

Evidence

The retrograde medullary superior pubic ramus screw for the treatment of anterior pelvic ring disruptions: a new technique

Routt MLC Jr, Simonian PT, Grujic L β€’ J Orthop Trauma (1995)
Source: J Orthop Trauma. 1995;9(1):35-44
Evidence

Superior pubic ramus fractures fixed with percutaneous screws: what predicts fixation failure?

Starr AJ, Nakatani T, Reinert CM, Cederberg K β€’ J Orthop Trauma (2008)
Source: J Orthop Trauma. 2008;22(2):81-87
Evidence

Pelvic ring disruptions: effective classification system and treatment protocols

Burgess AR, Eastridge BJ, Young JW, Ellison TS, Poka A, Bathon GH, Brumback RJ β€’ J Trauma (1990)
Source: J Trauma. 1990;30(7):848-856
Evidence

Pelvic ring fractures: should they be fixed?

Tile M β€’ J Bone Joint Surg Br (1988)
Source: J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1988;70(1):1-12
Evidence

Internal fixation of unstable pelvic ring injuries

Matta JM, Tornetta P III β€’ Clin Orthop Relat Res (1996)
Source: Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996;(329):129-140
Editorially reviewed β€” transparent references and correction processPublished by OrthoVellum Medical Education TeamEditorial boardMethodologyReview policy
Educational disclosure

Educational content is reviewed for source visibility, editorial coherence, and correction readiness.

No individual clinician credential is claimed unless a named person is shown.

Verify before clinical use; this is not medical advice or a substitute for local guidance.