Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty for Proximal Humerus Fracture

TraumaAdvancedCore Procedure

Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty for Proximal Humerus Fracture

Surgical technique guide for reverse total shoulder arthroplasty as primary treatment of complex proximal humeral fractures in elderly patients — indications, deltopectoral approach, glenoid and humeral preparation, tuberosity reconstruction, complications and outcomes

High-yield overview

Primary reverse TSA in elderly low-demand patients with comminuted 3- or 4-part fractures, head-split patterns or fracture-dislocations | advanced

Surgical Imaging

Critical Danger Structures and Exam Traps
Axillary Nerve — Deltopectoral Approach

Location: The axillary nerve exits the quadrilateral space and lies on the deep surface of the deltoid approximately 5-7 cm distal to the acromion. It is vulnerable during deltoid retraction and during humeral preparation.

Risk: Excessive or prolonged retraction of the deltoid or aggressive inferior capsular release can stretch or lacerate the nerve. Nerve injury presents as deltoid weakness and sensory loss over the lateral shoulder.

Fix: Identify the nerve early by palpation or direct visualisation, limit retraction time, and protect it with a Penrose drain or vessel loop during humeral work.

Glenoid Version and Baseplate Positioning

The trap: Placing the baseplate in excessive retroversion or superior tilt leads to scapular notching, reduced range of motion, and early loosening.

The fix: Use preoperative CT to measure glenoid version. Correct retroversion to less than 10 degrees with eccentric reaming or augmented baseplate. Place the baseplate low on the glenoid with 5-10 degrees of inferior tilt. Confirm with image intensifier or navigation.

Humeral Stem Height and Version

The trap: Setting the stem too proud prevents anatomic tuberosity reduction; setting it too low reduces deltoid tension and risks instability. Malrotation affects tuberosity healing and rotation recovery.

The fix: Use the pectoralis major tendon insertion as a landmark for stem height (approximately 5.5 cm from the top of the humeral head prosthesis in most systems). Set version to 20-30 degrees retroversion relative to the epicondylar axis or the bicipital groove. Trial reduction of the greater tuberosity must be anatomic before final implantation.

Scapular Notching Prevention

Mechanism: Impingement of the humeral socket on the inferior scapular neck during adduction and external rotation causes progressive bone loss and can lead to baseplate loosening.

Prevention: Inferior placement of the glenosphere (inferior overhang of 2-4 mm), inferior tilt of the baseplate, and use of a lateralised or inferior-offset glenosphere design. Avoid superior placement at all costs.

Acromial Stress Fracture

Risk factors: Excessive deltoid tension from over-lengthening the humerus, poor bone quality in elderly patients, and aggressive postoperative physiotherapy.

Recognition: Sudden onset of pain over the acromion 4-12 weeks postoperatively with loss of active elevation. Radiographs may show a transverse fracture line; CT confirms if plain films are equivocal.

Prevention: Avoid over-tensioning (humeral length should restore but not exceed native length). Protect the acromion with a sling for 4-6 weeks and delay aggressive deltoid strengthening.

Tuberosity Nonunion and Malunion

Consequence: Failure of tuberosity healing eliminates external and internal rotation recovery and converts the reverse TSA into a pure deltoid-powered elevation device with limited rotation.

Prevention: Anatomic reduction of both tuberosities around the prosthesis, robust autograft from the humeral head packed between tuberosity and shaft/prosthesis, and secure fixation with heavy non-absorbable sutures through bone tunnels and around the prosthesis. Avoid overstuffing the joint.

Mnemonic

I.N.D.I.C.A.T.EINDICATE — Indications for Primary Reverse TSA in Proximal Humerus Fracture

Mnemonic

D.E.L.T.O.P.E.C.T.O.R.A.LDELTOPECTORAL — Operative Steps for Reverse TSA in Fracture

Mnemonic

N.O.T.C.HNOTCH — Prevention of Scapular Notching and Key Complications

Surgical Indications

Absolute Indications

  • Comminuted 3- or 4-part proximal humerus fracture in a patient older than 70 years with low functional demand
  • Head-split fracture patterns where anatomic reconstruction is impossible
  • Fracture-dislocation with rotator cuff tear or tuberosity comminution precluding ORIF
  • Pre-existing rotator cuff deficiency or massive irreparable tear with fracture
  • Failed ORIF or hemiarthroplasty with tuberosity nonunion or cuff failure in an elderly patient

Relative Indications

  • 4-part fracture with poor bone quality where surgeon judges ORIF fixation unreliable
  • Valgus-impacted 4-part fracture with greater tuberosity comminution greater than 50%
  • Patient preference for single definitive procedure over staged reconstruction

Contraindications

Absolute:

  • Active infection
  • Severe glenoid bone loss precluding baseplate fixation
  • Non-functional deltoid (axillary nerve palsy)
  • High-demand younger patient where joint preservation or ORIF is feasible

Relative:

  • Moderate glenoid retroversion greater than 20 degrees without augmentation capability
  • Poor medical optimisation (uncontrolled diabetes, anticoagulation)
  • Cognitive impairment limiting rehabilitation compliance

Evidence for Primary Reverse TSA versus Hemiarthroplasty and ORIF

Functional Outcomes

Primary reverse TSA in selected elderly patients provides reliable elevation (typically 120-140 degrees) even when tuberosities do not heal. Hemiarthroplasty outcomes are highly dependent on tuberosity healing; nonunion rates of 30-50% lead to poor elevation and rotation. ORIF in osteoporotic 4-part fractures carries high reoperation rates for screw cut-out and avascular necrosis.

Key Comparative Evidence

  • Primary reverse TSA shows lower reoperation rates than ORIF in patients older than 70 years with complex fracture patterns.
  • Elevation is superior to hemiarthroplasty when tuberosity healing is unreliable.
  • Rotation recovery remains inferior to anatomic reconstruction when tuberosities heal, but patient satisfaction is high because elevation is functional for activities of daily living.

Decision Threshold

Age greater than 70 years, low demand, and fracture patterns with greater than 50% tuberosity comminution or head-split morphology shift the balance toward primary reverse TSA. In younger or higher-demand patients, ORIF with modern locking-plate constructs or hemiarthroplasty with meticulous tuberosity repair remains preferred when bone quality permits.


Clinical Decision Scenarios

Practise clinical reasoning and management decisions out loud

Viva scenarioAdvanced
Clinical prompt

A 78-year-old woman with low functional demand presents with a comminuted 4-part proximal humerus fracture after a fall. CT shows greater tuberosity comminution involving greater than 60% of the fragment and a head-split component. The rotator cuff appears intact on imaging. What is your recommended treatment and why?

Practical approach
Primary reverse total shoulder arthroplasty is the most appropriate treatment for this patient. At age 78 with low demand and a highly comminuted 4-part fracture with head-split morphology and substantial tuberosity comminution, the likelihood of reliable tuberosity healing with ORIF or hemiarthroplasty is low. Reverse TSA provides reliable deltoid-driven elevation even if the tuberosities do not heal — this is the decisive functional advantage in this age and fracture pattern. **Pre-operative planning**: Obtain a CT with 3D reconstruction to assess glenoid version and bone stock, and to plan baseplate position. Counsel the patient that elevation for activities of daily living is the goal; rotation recovery depends on tuberosity healing and is less predictable. **Surgical plan**: Deltopectoral approach. Tag both tuberosities before humeral head removal. Prepare the glenoid with inferior tilt and 2-4 mm glenosphere overhang. Set humeral stem height so the greater tuberosity reduces anatomically (referenced to pectoralis major insertion). Reconstruct the tuberosities with heavy sutures and autograft from the humeral head. Verify anatomic reduction fluoroscopically. **Post-operative care**: Abduction sling for 6 weeks, passive elevation only for the first 4 weeks to protect the tuberosity reconstruction. Active exercises begin at 6 weeks with emphasis on deltoid strengthening.
Viva scenarioAdvanced
Clinical prompt

Six weeks after reverse TSA for a 4-part fracture, a 75-year-old man reports sudden onset of pain over the acromion and loss of active elevation. Radiographs show a transverse acromial fracture. How do you manage this complication?

Practical approach
This is an acromial stress fracture, a recognised complication after reverse TSA caused by increased deltoid tension. Management is primarily non-operative in the majority of cases. **Assessment**: Confirm the diagnosis with CT if plain films are equivocal. Assess deltoid function and rule out infection or component loosening. Measure humeral length on radiographs to determine whether over-lengthening contributed. **Treatment**: Return to sling immobilisation for 6-8 weeks. Avoid active elevation and deltoid strengthening. Analgesia and activity modification. Most fractures heal with this approach and patients regain functional elevation, although some residual weakness may persist. **Prevention for future cases**: Avoid excessive humeral lengthening (humeral length should restore but not exceed native length). Protect the acromion with a sling for at least 4-6 weeks postoperatively and delay aggressive deltoid strengthening until 8-12 weeks. **Surgical options**: Open reduction and internal fixation is rarely required and is reserved for displaced fractures with significant loss of function. Revision to a more lateralised glenosphere or reduced offset may be considered in refractory cases with over-tensioning.
Viva scenarioAdvanced
Clinical prompt

You are planning reverse TSA for a 72-year-old woman with a 4-part proximal humerus fracture. Preoperative CT shows 25 degrees of glenoid retroversion. How do you address glenoid version during surgery and what are the consequences of leaving it uncorrected?

Practical approach
Glenoid retroversion greater than 15-20 degrees must be corrected during baseplate implantation to avoid posterior instability, eccentric loading, and early loosening. **Pre-operative assessment**: The 25-degree retroversion is measured on the axial CT slice at the level of the glenoid centre. I would plan to use an augmented baseplate or perform eccentric anterior reaming to correct version to less than 10 degrees. **Intraoperative technique**: After glenoid exposure, place the guide pin using a version guide or navigation system referencing the scapular axis. Ream anteriorly more than posteriorly to correct version while preserving posterior bone stock. If correction requires removal of greater than 5-7 mm of anterior bone, use an augmented baseplate (usually 10- or 15-degree posterior augment) rather than excessive reaming. **Consequences of uncorrected retroversion**: Persistent posterior subluxation of the humeral component, eccentric loading on the posterior glenoid, accelerated polyethylene wear, baseplate loosening, and limited internal rotation. Scapular notching may also be exacerbated by altered biomechanics. **Verification**: Intraoperative fluoroscopy or navigation confirms baseplate version and inferior tilt before final implantation. The glenosphere is then impacted and stability is tested.
Exam day cheat sheet
Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty for Proximal Humerus Fracture — Exam Day Summary

References

Evidence

Primary reverse shoulder arthroplasty versus hemiarthroplasty for acute proximal humerus fractures in elderly patients

Level II
Cuff DJ, Pupello DRJ Shoulder Elbow Surg
Clinical implication: Primary reverse TSA is a reasonable choice in selected elderly low-demand patients with complex proximal humerus fractures where tuberosity healing is unlikely.
Evidence

Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for acute proximal humerus fractures: a systematic review

Level III
Anakwenze OA, Zoller S, Ahmad CS, Levine WNJ Shoulder Elbow Surg
Clinical implication: Reverse TSA provides reliable elevation in elderly fracture patients; tuberosity reconstruction improves rotation but is not required for functional elevation.
Evidence

Scapular notching in reverse shoulder arthroplasty: the effect of glenosphere position and design

Level II
Simovitch RW, Zumstein MA, Lohri E, Helmy N, Gerber CJ Bone Joint Surg Am
Clinical implication: Meticulous glenoid baseplate positioning with inferior tilt and overhang is mandatory to minimise scapular notching.
Evidence

Tuberosity healing after reverse shoulder arthroplasty for proximal humerus fracture: factors influencing outcome

Level III
Boileau P, Chuinard C, Roussanne Y, Neyton L, Trojani CJ Shoulder Elbow Surg
Clinical implication: Tuberosity reconstruction should be attempted in every case; meticulous technique and autograft improve healing and rotation recovery.
Evidence

Acromial stress fractures after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: incidence, risk factors and management

Level IV
Crosby LA, Hamilton A, Twiss TJ Shoulder Elbow Surg
Clinical implication: Protect the acromion with a sling for 4-6 weeks and avoid over-lengthening the humerus to minimise this complication.
Editorially reviewed — transparent references and correction processPublished by OrthoVellum Medical Education TeamEditorial boardMethodologyReview policy
Educational disclosure

Educational content is reviewed for source visibility, editorial coherence, and correction readiness.

No individual clinician credential is claimed unless a named person is shown.

Verify before clinical use; this is not medical advice or a substitute for local guidance.