Skip to main content
OrthoVellumOrthopaedic Exam Prep
Pricing
About OrthoVellum
OrthoVellum
A living orthopaedic atlas

Exam-focused orthopaedic references, a question bank, viva practice, and spaced-repetition revision — with every clinical claim traceable to its source. Content is educational only and is not a substitute for local supervision, clinical judgement, or institutional policy.


Library

  • Clinical Topics
  • Blog
  • Site Updates
  • Content Methodology

Company

  • About Us
  • Authors & Disclosure
  • Editorial Team
  • Editorial Policy
  • Advertising Policy

Legal

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Medical Disclaimer
  • Copyright & DMCA

Support

  • Support OrthoVellum
  • Help Center
  • Contact
  • Accessibility
Evidence. Clarity. Practice.

© 2026 OrthoVellum. For educational purposes only.

Not medical advice. Verify clinically important information against current local guidance.

Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty (RSA)

Operative SurgeryShoulder & Elbow
Shoulder & ElbowAdvancedCore Procedure

Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty (RSA)

How to perform reverse shoulder arthroplasty through the deltopectoral approach — the Grammont design rationale, inferior glenoid exposure and baseplate positioning step by step, scapular notching prevention, and rehabilitation. advanced orthopaedic operative-surgery guide.

Procedure console
45 min
Read
0
Sections
advanced
Level
Peer-reviewed · 2026-06-20
High-yield overview

Deltopectoral approach · Grammont design — the deltoid is the motor

90%+Patient satisfaction
50–80%Scapular notching
2–5%Instability rate
90–95%10-year survival
Critical Must-Knows
  • RSA needs a FUNCTIONING DELTOID and an intact AXILLARY NERVE — the deltoid is the sole motor for elevation. Axillary nerve injury is catastrophic and the operation will fail without it.
  • The Grammont design medialises the centre of rotation to the glenoid face and distalises the humerus, increasing the deltoid moment arm by 30–40 percent so the deltoid alone can elevate the arm.
  • The baseplate must sit FLUSH with the INFERIOR glenoid rim with 5–10 degrees of inferior tilt. A superior baseplate position causes scapular notching in 50–80 percent of cases.
  • The axillary nerve runs on the anterior-inferior capsule 5–7 cm below the acromion — protect it during the inferior capsular release, under direct vision.
  • TSA needs an intact cuff; RSA is for cuff DEFICIENCY. Instability after RSA is INFERIOR (opposite to TSA, which is posterior) — test it with the arm adducted.

When & Why


Indication. RSA is the operation for the cuff-deficient shoulder. The commonest indication is cuff tear arthropathy (Hamada grade 4–5) — pseudoparalysis (active elevation less than 90 degrees) with superior migration of the humeral head and acetabularisation of the acromion. It is also indicated for: - A massive irreparable rotator cuff tear with pseudoparalysis (elevation less than 90 degrees).

  • Complex proximal humerus fractures in the elderly — patients older than about 70 years with 3–4 part, head-split or fracture-dislocation patterns.
  • Failed rotator cuff repair with stiffness and pain.
  • Revision total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) with rotator cuff deficiency.
  • Rheumatoid arthritis with cuff destruction. Expanding indications include tumour reconstruction of the proximal humerus, severe bone loss in the revision setting, complex instability in the elderly with cuff deficiency, and selected acute fractures (controversial in younger patients). The absolute requirement. A functioning deltoid with an intact axillary nerve. The deltoid is the sole motor in RSA — without it the arm will not elevate regardless of the implant. Examine deltoid bulk, active contraction and axillary nerve sensation pre-operatively in every patient. RSA or TSA? The cuff status decides:
TSA — cuff INTACT

Primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis with a functioning rotator cuff. The cuff is needed to centre the head and to power movement.

RSA — cuff DEFICIENT

Cuff tear arthropathy, a massive irreparable tear with pseudoparalysis, or a cuff-deficient revision. The reversed geometry lets the deltoid work alone.

Pseudoparalysis decides

If the patient cannot actively elevate above 90 degrees, the cuff is deficient regardless of the radiograph — choose RSA.

Contraindications. Absolute: deltoid insufficiency (paralysis or prior deltoid detachment failure), axillary nerve palsy, active infection, and glenoid bone stock that cannot be reconstructed. Relative: age less than 60 (higher revision burden and glenoid loosening concerns), high-demand patients expecting a return to sport or heavy labour, prior radiation to the shoulder (deltoid and soft-tissue damage), Charcot arthropathy, and uncontrolled diabetes or immunosuppression. Pre-operative assessment. Clinically, document active elevation (pseudoparalysis is less than 90 degrees), the external rotation lag sign (infraspinatus), the Hornblower sign (teres minor), the belly-press test (subscapularis), and — critically — deltoid bulk, function and axillary nerve sensation. Image with plain X-rays (AP, axillary lateral, Y-view) to assess the acromiohumeral interval (less than 7 mm indicates superior escape and cuff deficiency), acetabularisation and glenoid morphology; a CT scan for glenoid version and bone stock (retroversion more than 20 degrees may need an augmented baseplate, and more than 30 percent bone loss may need a graft); and an MRI to confirm the cuff is irreparable (Goutallier fatty infiltration) and to judge deltoid quality. Counsel the patient honestly: pain relief is excellent, forward elevation reaches about 120–140 degrees, but external rotation is often limited to neutral, scapular notching is common (50–80 percent), and 10–15 year implant survival is around 90–95 percent.

Indication red flags

Do not use RSA for primary osteoarthritis with an intact cuff — TSA is indicated, and RSA carries a higher complication rate. Never proceed without examining the deltoid, because a subtle axillary nerve palsy will cause the operation to fail. RSA is not for the young high-demand patient expecting a return to heavy sport, and pseudoparalysis (active elevation less than 90 degrees) means cuff deficiency regardless of the X-ray.

The Operation


The goal is to resurface the glenoid with a glenosphere and the humerus with a concave polyethylene, medialising and distalising the centre of rotation so the deltoid can elevate the arm without a cuff. Everything hinges on exposure of the inferior glenoid and baseplate position. The steps below follow the deltopectoral approach, which is laid out in depth on the deltopectoral approach to the shoulder page.

Reverse shoulder arthroplasty
Reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a glenosphere on the glenoid and a humeral cup medialise and lower the joint centre for deltoid-driven elevation.Credit: OrthoVellum surgical illustration

Operative sequence

Step 1Position, landmarks & setup
  • Beach chair at 70–80 degrees — more upright than for TSA, because glenoid access (especially the inferior glenoid) is critical.
  • Head secured in a horseshoe headrest; place a large bump under the medial scapular border to roll the scapula forward and bring the glenoid face anteriorly.
  • Arm draped completely free to the fingertips so it can be manipulated; fluoroscopy available to confirm baseplate position.
  • Mark the coracoid (the key landmark, palpated at every step), clavicle, acromion, AC joint and scapular spine.
Step 2Incision & the deltopectoral interval — the exposure
  • A 15–18 cm curvilinear incision from the coracoid distally toward the deltoid insertion — longer than for TSA because glenoid access is more demanding.
  • Identify the deltopectoral groove and cephalic vein. Most surgeons retract the vein laterally with the deltoid (it has more tributaries on the deltoid side); the key is consistency. If it tears, ligate both ends and continue.
  • Develop the interval proximally to the clavicle and distally 8–10 cm. This is a true internervous plane: deltoid (axillary nerve) lateral, pectoralis major (medial and lateral pectoral nerves) medial.
Step 3Deep exposure — protect the deltoid and the nerves
  • Identify the conjoint tendon medially. The musculocutaneous nerve enters the conjoint tendon 5–8 cm distal to the coracoid (mean 5.5 cm) — keep the medial retractor within 5 cm of the coracoid and avoid distal medial dissection.
  • Release the upper pectoralis major insertion if needed, staying on bone to protect the anterior circumflex vessels.
  • Identify subscapularis — in cuff tear arthropathy it is often absent or severely atrophic; if present it may be released without repair, because RSA does not depend on it.
  • Protect the deltoid absolutely — it is the motor for RSA, so avoid excessive lateral retraction.
Step 4Capsulectomy & joint entry — protect the axillary nerve
  • Perform an aggressive 360-degree capsular release — more extensive than in TSA: superior (excise the cuff remnant), anterior (with subscapularis), posterior, and inferior.
  • The inferior release is the dangerous step. The axillary nerve runs with the posterior circumflex humeral artery on the anterior-inferior capsule, 5–7 cm below the acromion. Perform this release under direct vision, never blindly.
Step 5Humeral head removal
  • Externally rotate, extend and adduct to deliver the humeral head.
  • Make the humeral neck cut at the anatomic neck. The cut inclination matches the implant neck-shaft angle: the original Grammont/Delta uses a steeply valgus 155-degree inlay cup, while most modern systems use a 135–145-degree onlay or inlay design that lowers the humerus less and reduces adduction notching. Set the cut to the chosen system — do not free-hand a 155-degree cut into a 145-degree system.
Step 6Glenoid exposure — the critical step
  • Place three retractors: anterior over the anterior rim, posterior into the capsule, and an inferior retractor into the axillary recess (protecting the axillary nerve).
  • Expose the entire glenoid face including the inferior border — remove all labrum, capsule and osteophytes. If the inferior glenoid is not clearly seen, the baseplate cannot be placed correctly.
Step 7Baseplate positioning — the critical decision
  • The baseplate must sit flush with the inferior glenoid rim with 5–10 degrees of inferior tilt, in neutral version (0–5 degrees), and centred (not superior).
  • Place the central guide pin aiming toward the coracoid base; confirm the position with fluoroscopy. Ream the glenoid face flat to bleeding bone.
Step 8Baseplate fixation & glenosphere
  • Insert the baseplate with central fixation (press-fit or screw), then 2–4 peripheral locking screws, all aiming for bicortical purchase (28–40 mm).
  • Superior screw toward the coracoid base (strongest bone); inferior screw parallel to the face or slightly inferior; posterior screw at the scapular body anterior to the suprascapular notch (the nerve runs in the notch); anterior screw in a safe direction.
  • Insert the glenosphere — typically 36 or 38 mm (larger means more stability and less notching); standard, lateralised or inferior-eccentric designs modify notching and range of motion.
Step 9Humeral preparation
  • Open the canal with a box chisel in the centre of the metaphysis, then sequential broaching to metaphyseal contact.
  • Set humeral retroversion at 0–20 degrees — less than TSA's 20–30 degrees — to optimise external rotation, which is limited in these patients.
Step 10Trial, stability & final implantation
  • Insert the trial stem and polyethylene liner (typically 6, 9 or 12 mm) and reduce.
  • Test stability: the commonest RSA instability is inferior — hold the arm adducted and apply an inferior distraction force; if it subluxes, use a thicker liner. Forward elevation should exceed 90 degrees (aim for 120–140 degrees); external rotation is often limited.
  • Insert the final stem (cemented for poor bone, a wide canal, a metaphyseal defect or a periprosthetic fracture; otherwise an uncemented metaphyseal-engaging stem) and the matched liner, and reduce.
Step 11Subscapularis, final check & closure
  • If subscapularis was present and released, repair is optional in RSA (unlike TSA, where it is critical) — many surgeons do not repair, as function does not depend on it.
  • Re-test all directions of stability (inferior, anterior, posterior) and document the range of motion achieved.
  • Copious irrigation, meticulous haemostasis and a deep drain. Close the deltopectoral interval loosely (overtightening restricts the deltoid). Apply a sling with an abduction pillow at 30 degrees to prevent inferior instability.
Axillary nerve — the catastrophe to avoid

The axillary nerve runs with the posterior circumflex humeral artery on the anterior-inferior capsule, 5–7 cm below the acromion. It is at risk during the inferior capsular release and inferior glenoid retractor placement. Release under direct vision, place the inferior retractor carefully, and avoid excessive traction. Injury paralyses the deltoid — and because the deltoid is the sole motor in RSA, the operation is essentially failed. Examine deltoid function and axillary nerve sensation before and after surgery; if there is no recovery by 6–12 months the prognosis is poor.

If you cannot see the inferior glenoid, stop

A superiorly-placed baseplate is the commonest cause of scapular notching (50–80 percent). If the inferior glenoid rim is not clearly exposed, take the time — complete the capsulectomy, reposition the scapular bump, and place the three retractors properly. The central guide pin should aim toward the coracoid base; confirm the inferior position with fluoroscopy before reaming.

Axillary nerve

On the anterior-inferior capsule, 5–7 cm below the acromion, with the posterior circumflex humeral artery. Injury is catastrophic — deltoid paralysis means RSA cannot function. Protect it during the inferior release and the inferior retractor, under direct vision.

Musculocutaneous nerve

Enters the conjoint tendon 5–8 cm distal to the coracoid (mean 5.5 cm). Injury causes biceps weakness and lateral forearm numbness. Keep the medial retractor within 5 cm of the coracoid; never retract the conjoint blindly.

Suprascapular nerve

Runs in the suprascapular notch, posterior to the glenoid. At risk from a posteriorly-directed baseplate screw. Aim the posterior screw at the scapular body, anterior to the notch.

Brachial plexus

Deep to the conjoint tendon, medial to the field. At risk from overzealous medial dissection or a deep medial retractor. Stay lateral to the conjoint, avoid deep medial dissection, and avoid excessive head tilt to prevent a traction injury.

Cephalic vein — which way to retract

About 90 percent of surgeons retract the cephalic vein laterally with the deltoid, because it has more tributaries on the deltoid side, keeping them under direct vision. The key is consistency — always retract the same way so you know where the vein is. If it tears, ligate both ends and continue; it is not critical.

Why RSA instability is inferior, not posterior

In RSA the concave polyethylene sits on the convex glenosphere, and with the arm adducted the liner can ride off inferiorly — so the commonest dislocation direction is inferior (opposite to TSA, where posterior instability predominates). Test by adducting the arm and applying inferior distraction. Treat with a thicker liner; an abduction pillow post-operatively holds the arm out of the inferior subluxation position.

Aftercare & Complications


Rehabilitation | Phase | Timing | Immobilisation | Therapy | |-------|--------|-----------------|---------| | 1 | 0–6 weeks | Sling with abduction pillow (30 degrees) | Passive forward elevation to 120 degrees, external rotation to 20 degrees, pendulums; no active elevation | | 2 | 6–12 weeks | Wean the sling | Active-assisted then active ROM; begin deltoid strengthening | | 3 | 12 weeks plus | None | Unrestricted activities; advanced strengthening | Because RSA does not depend on subscapularis, passive forward elevation can begin immediately (unlike TSA). X-rays are taken at 6 weeks, 3 months, 1 year, then annually to monitor scapular notching and baseplate fixation. Expected outcome: excellent pain relief (90 percent or more), forward elevation of 120–140 degrees, external rotation often limited to neutral, and 90 percent or better satisfaction. Complications

Scapular notching (50–80%)
Recognition
AP X-ray: erosion of the lateral scapular pillar below the glenosphere, Sirveaux grade 1–4; often asymptomatic
Prevention
Baseplate flush with the inferior glenoid, 5–10 degrees inferior tilt; larger (38 mm) glenosphere; lateralised designs
Management
Grade 1–2 observe; grade 3–4 with loosening needs complex revision (reposition, graft, lateralised design)
Instability (2–5%)
Recognition
Dislocation (usually inferior) or recurrent subluxation; X-rays show component position
Prevention
Appropriate liner thickness, avoid excessive glenoid anteversion, tension the soft tissues, test stability intra-operatively
Management
Closed reduction if acute; recurrent — CT the components, revise if malpositioned, thicker or constrained liner
Axillary nerve injury (1–4%)
Recognition
Deltoid weakness or paralysis, sensory loss over the lateral shoulder; catastrophic for RSA
Prevention
Inferior capsular release under direct vision; careful inferior retractor; avoid traction
Management
EMG at 6 weeks; most are neuropraxia — observe 6–12 months; if no recovery, RSA has failed
Infection (2–4%)
Recognition
Pain, erythema, discharge, fever, raised inflammatory markers; higher rate than TSA
Prevention
Prophylactic antibiotics; optimise diabetes, nutrition, smoking; avoid haematoma
Management
Acute (less than 6 weeks): washout, IV antibiotics, retain; chronic: two-stage revision
Acromial or scapular stress fracture (1–5%)
Recognition
New pain weeks to months post-op, tender over the acromion or spine; X-ray or CT confirms
Prevention
Largely unavoidable — altered biomechanics and increased deltoid tension; avoid over-lengthening
Management
Most heal with a sling for 6–12 weeks; non-union may need ORIF
Periprosthetic fracture (2–4%)
Recognition
Intra-operative (during preparation or implantation) or post-operative (a fall)
Prevention
Careful technique in osteoporotic bone; avoid a varus entry; appropriate stem
Management
Intra-operative: cerclage, longer stem or ORIF; post-operative: revise with a longer stem if unstable
Baseplate loosening (5–10% at 10 years)
Recognition
Progressive pain and loss of function; radiolucency around the baseplate, often with advanced notching
Prevention
Bicortical screws, correct inferior position, augment bone defects
Management
Revision: remove the baseplate, graft the defects, larger or augmented baseplate
Limited external rotation (common)
Recognition
Cannot reach behind the head; pre-existing from cuff deficiency
Prevention
Use less humeral retroversion (0–20 degrees); consider a latissimus dorsi transfer in selected cases
Management
Usually accepted; a latissimus dorsi or teres major transfer can add 20–30 degrees of ER
Complications — recognition, prevention, management
ComplicationRecognitionPreventionManagement
Scapular notching (50–80%)AP X-ray: erosion of the lateral scapular pillar below the glenosphere, Sirveaux grade 1–4; often asymptomaticBaseplate flush with the inferior glenoid, 5–10 degrees inferior tilt; larger (38 mm) glenosphere; lateralised designsGrade 1–2 observe; grade 3–4 with loosening needs complex revision (reposition, graft, lateralised design)
Instability (2–5%)Dislocation (usually inferior) or recurrent subluxation; X-rays show component positionAppropriate liner thickness, avoid excessive glenoid anteversion, tension the soft tissues, test stability intra-operativelyClosed reduction if acute; recurrent — CT the components, revise if malpositioned, thicker or constrained liner
Axillary nerve injury (1–4%)Deltoid weakness or paralysis, sensory loss over the lateral shoulder; catastrophic for RSAInferior capsular release under direct vision; careful inferior retractor; avoid tractionEMG at 6 weeks; most are neuropraxia — observe 6–12 months; if no recovery, RSA has failed
Infection (2–4%)Pain, erythema, discharge, fever, raised inflammatory markers; higher rate than TSAProphylactic antibiotics; optimise diabetes, nutrition, smoking; avoid haematomaAcute (less than 6 weeks): washout, IV antibiotics, retain; chronic: two-stage revision
Acromial or scapular stress fracture (1–5%)New pain weeks to months post-op, tender over the acromion or spine; X-ray or CT confirmsLargely unavoidable — altered biomechanics and increased deltoid tension; avoid over-lengtheningMost heal with a sling for 6–12 weeks; non-union may need ORIF
Periprosthetic fracture (2–4%)Intra-operative (during preparation or implantation) or post-operative (a fall)Careful technique in osteoporotic bone; avoid a varus entry; appropriate stemIntra-operative: cerclage, longer stem or ORIF; post-operative: revise with a longer stem if unstable
Baseplate loosening (5–10% at 10 years)Progressive pain and loss of function; radiolucency around the baseplate, often with advanced notchingBicortical screws, correct inferior position, augment bone defectsRevision: remove the baseplate, graft the defects, larger or augmented baseplate
Limited external rotation (common)Cannot reach behind the head; pre-existing from cuff deficiencyUse less humeral retroversion (0–20 degrees); consider a latissimus dorsi transfer in selected casesUsually accepted; a latissimus dorsi or teres major transfer can add 20–30 degrees of ER

Viva & Exam Focus


Mnemonic

REVERSEREVERSE — indications for RSA

R
Rotator cuff deficiency
cuff tear arthropathy (Hamada 4–5)
E
Elderly proximal humerus fractures
3–4 part fractures in patients older than 70 years
V
Very large irreparable cuff tear
with pseudoparalysis (elevation less than 90 degrees)
E
Earlier failed procedures
revision TSA, failed cuff repair
R
Rheumatoid shoulder
with cuff deficiency
S
Severe bone loss
revisions, tumour resection
E
Essentially functioning deltoid required
the axillary nerve must be intact
Mnemonic

GRAMMONTGRAMMONT — design principles

G
Glenosphere on the glenoid
the ball is on the socket side (reversed)
R
Rotation centre medialised
to the glenoid face
A
Arm distalised
lengthens and tensions the deltoid
M
Moment arm increased
the deltoid moment arm rises by 30–40 percent
M
Motor is the deltoid alone
the cuff is not required
O
Origin of the deltoid unchanged
the acromion
N
No cuff needed
RSA is for cuff-deficient shoulders
T
Torque generation increased
deltoid torque rises by 30–40 percent

Clinical Decision Scenarios

Practise clinical reasoning and management decisions out loud

Viva scenarioModerate
Clinical prompt

“A 75-year-old woman has severe shoulder pain and cannot lift her arm above horizontal, for the past 2 years. The X-ray shows superior migration of the humeral head with acetabularisation of the acromion. What is your diagnosis and management?”

Viva scenarioModerate
Clinical prompt

“What is scapular notching, why does it occur, and how do you prevent it?”

Viva scenarioAdvanced
Clinical prompt

“Explain the Grammont design principles and how RSA biomechanics differ from the native shoulder and from TSA.”

Exam day cheat sheet
Reverse shoulder arthroplasty — exam-day essentials

Indications (cuff deficiency)

  • Cuff tear arthropathy (Hamada 4–5) — the commonest indication
  • Massive irreparable cuff tear with pseudoparalysis (elevation less than 90 degrees)
  • Proximal humerus fractures in the elderly (older than 70 years, 3–4 part)
  • Revision TSA with cuff deficiency
  • Absolute requirement: a functioning deltoid plus an intact axillary nerve

Grammont principles

  • Medialised centre of rotation — deltoid moment arm up 30–40 percent
  • Distalised humerus — tensions the deltoid by 2–3 cm
  • Fixed fulcrum at the glenosphere — the deltoid acts as an efficient lever
  • The deltoid is the sole motor — the cuff is not required
  • Inversion of the articulation (ball on the socket side) gives inherent stability

Key technical points

  • Baseplate flush with the inferior glenoid, 5–10 degrees of inferior tilt
  • The central pin aims at the coracoid base (confirm with fluoroscopy)
  • Humeral version 0–20 degrees (less than TSA's 20–30 degrees)
  • Subscapularis repair is optional (unlike TSA, where it is critical)
  • Test inferior stability — the commonest instability direction

Danger structures

  • Axillary nerve: 5–7 cm below the acromion on the anterior-inferior capsule — catastrophic if injured
  • Musculocutaneous nerve: enters the conjoint tendon 5–8 cm distal to the coracoid
  • Suprascapular nerve: posterior to the glenoid — posterior screw risk
  • Posterior circumflex humeral artery: travels with the axillary nerve

Scapular notching prevention

  • Occurs in 50–80 percent — the most important complication to prevent
  • Primary cause: a superior baseplate position
  • Prevention: baseplate flush inferior with 5–10 degrees of inferior tilt
  • A larger glenosphere (38 mm) and lateralised designs reduce the risk
  • Sirveaux grade 1–4 (grade 4 lies under the baseplate)

RSA versus TSA

  • RSA: cuff deficient; TSA: cuff intact
  • RSA: inferior instability; TSA: posterior instability
  • RSA: subscapularis optional; TSA: subscapularis critical
  • RSA: humeral version 0–20 degrees; TSA: 20–30 degrees
  • RSA: abduction pillow; TSA: simple sling

Expected outcomes

  • Pain relief: excellent (90 percent or more)
  • Forward elevation: 120–140 degrees typical
  • External rotation: limited (neutral to 20 degrees) — counsel the patient
  • 10-year survival: about 90 percent (AOANJRR, NJR, AJRR data)
  • Complications: notching 50–80 percent, instability 2–5 percent, infection 2–4 percent

Examiner favourites

  • Why RSA works without a cuff — the Grammont mechanism (medialised centre of rotation, deltoid moment arm)
  • Why baseplate position is critical — it prevents scapular notching
  • Why axillary nerve injury is catastrophic — the deltoid is the sole motor
  • RSA versus TSA indications — cuff status decides
  • How to test stability — inferior distraction with the arm adducted

Background & Evidence


Design rationale. Paul Grammont developed reverse shoulder arthroplasty in the 1980s around a single idea — make the deltoid able to elevate the arm without a rotator cuff. Two design changes deliver this. First, the centre of rotation is medialised to the glenoid face, which increases the deltoid moment arm by 30–40 percent and recruits more deltoid fibres as abductors. Second, the humerus is distalised, which restores deltoid tension (by about 2–3 cm). A large glenosphere with no neck and a non-anatomic (originally 155-degree) humeral cup medialise and stabilise the centre of rotation and minimise torque on the glenoid. The convex glenosphere on the glenoid and the concave polyethylene on the humerus invert the articulation and provide a fixed, conforming fulcrum that prevents the superior escape seen in a failed TSA. The trade-offs follow directly from the geometry: external rotation is limited (the external rotators are deficient and the fulcrum is medialised) and the medialised centre brings the polyethylene close to the scapular pillar in adduction, causing scapular notching. Modern lateralised designs (bony-increased-offset RSA, 135-degree stems) restore some lateral offset to reduce notching and improve external rotation.

Centre of rotation
Native shoulder
Humeral head (lateral)
TSA
Humeral head
RSA
Glenoid face (medial)
Cuff requirement
Native shoulder
Essential
TSA
Essential
RSA
Not required
Motor for elevation
Native shoulder
Supraspinatus and deltoid
TSA
Supraspinatus and deltoid
RSA
Deltoid alone
Stability
Native shoulder
Dynamic (cuff)
TSA
Dynamic (cuff)
RSA
Static (conforming)
Deltoid moment arm
Native shoulder
Standard
TSA
Standard
RSA
Increased 30–40 percent
Biomechanics — native shoulder, TSA and RSA
FeatureNative shoulderTSARSA
Centre of rotationHumeral head (lateral)Humeral headGlenoid face (medial)
Cuff requirementEssentialEssentialNot required
Motor for elevationSupraspinatus and deltoidSupraspinatus and deltoidDeltoid alone
StabilityDynamic (cuff)Dynamic (cuff)Static (conforming)
Deltoid moment armStandardStandardIncreased 30–40 percent

Scapular notching — the Sirveaux classification. Notching is mechanical impingement of the polyethylene on the lateral scapular pillar during adduction, visible on the AP X-ray as bone erosion below the glenosphere. It appears in 50–80 percent of RSA radiographs (many are asymptomatic grade 1–2). The dominant preventable cause is a superior baseplate position.

1
Radiographic finding
Small defect confined to the scapular pillar
Significance
Usually asymptomatic
2
Radiographic finding
Defect extends to the inferior screw
Significance
Usually observe
3
Radiographic finding
Defect extends over the inferior screw
Significance
Risk of progressive loosening
4
Radiographic finding
Defect extends under the baseplate
Significance
Loosening risk — may need revision
Sirveaux scapular notching classification
GradeRadiographic findingSignificance
1Small defect confined to the scapular pillarUsually asymptomatic
2Defect extends to the inferior screwUsually observe
3Defect extends over the inferior screwRisk of progressive loosening
4Defect extends under the baseplateLoosening risk — may need revision

References


Evidence

Grammont reverse prosthesis: design, rationale, and biomechanics

Level IV
Boileau P, Watkinson DJ, Hatzidakis AM, Balg F • J Shoulder Elbow Surg (2005)
Key Findings:
  • Two innovations underpin the Grammont design: a large glenosphere with no neck and a non-anatomic 155° humeral cup covering less than half of the glenosphere
  • Design medialises and stabilises the centre of rotation, minimises torque on the glenoid, and recruits more deltoid fibres as abductors; the humerus is lowered to restore deltoid tension
  • Restores active elevation above 90° in cuff-deficient shoulders, but external rotation remains limited (especially with absent or fatty teres minor) and scapular notching is a concern
Clinical implication: Establishes the biomechanical rationale that RSA works because deltoid efficiency is increased by a medialised, distalised centre of rotation - and why external rotation stays limited and notching occurs.
Verify on PubMed (PMID 15726075)
Evidence

Grammont inverted total shoulder arthroplasty for glenohumeral OA with massive cuff tear (multicentre, 80 shoulders) - source of the notching classification

Level IV
Sirveaux F, Favard L, Oudet D, Huquet D, Walch G, Molé D • J Bone Joint Surg Br (2004)
Key Findings:
  • 80 shoulders, mean follow-up 44 months: mean Constant score rose from 22.6 to 65.6; active forward elevation rose from 73° to 138°
  • Integrity of teres minor was essential for recovery of external rotation and significantly influenced the Constant score
  • Defined the scapular notching grading (Sirveaux Grade 1-4); recommended the prosthesis be reserved for elderly patients
Clinical implication: Validates dramatic elevation gains, identifies teres minor as the key to external rotation recovery, and provides the Sirveaux notching grade examiners expect.
Verify on PubMed (PMID 15125127)
Evidence

Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: survivorship analysis of eighty replacements followed for five to ten years

Level IV
Guery J, Favard L, Sirveaux F, Oudet D, Mole D, Walch G • J Bone Joint Surg Am (2006)
Key Findings:
  • Survival at 120 months was 91% with prosthesis replacement as the endpoint and 84% with glenoid loosening as the endpoint
  • Cuff-tear arthropathy fared significantly better than other aetiologies (rheumatoid, trauma, revision)
  • Two breaks in the survival curve: early loosening at around 3 years, then progressive functional deterioration from around 6 years
Clinical implication: Underpins the quoted 10-year survival figures and the counselling point that functional deterioration accelerates beyond 6 years - a reason for caution in younger patients.
Verify on PubMed (PMID 16882896)
Evidence

Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a review of results according to aetiology

Level IV
Wall B, Nové-Josserand L, O'Connor DP, Edwards TB, Walch G • J Bone Joint Surg Am (2007)
Key Findings:
  • 240 RSAs (mean age 72.7 years): mean Constant score improved from 23 to 60; 173 of 186 patients satisfied or very satisfied
  • Cuff-tear arthropathy, primary OA with cuff tear, and massive cuff tear had better outcomes than post-traumatic arthritis or revision
  • Dislocation and infection were the most common complications; revision cases had higher complication rates than primaries
Clinical implication: Supports aetiology-based counselling: best results in primary cuff-deficient pathology, worst in post-traumatic or revision settings where complications rise.
Verify on PubMed (PMID 17606786)
Evidence

The Reverse Shoulder Prosthesis for glenohumeral arthritis with severe rotator cuff deficiency (minimum two-year follow-up, 60 patients)

Level IV
Frankle M, Siegal S, Pupello D, Saleem A, Mighell M, Vasey M • J Bone Joint Surg Am (2005)
Key Findings:
  • 60 patients (mean age 71): mean ASES score improved from 34.3 to 68.2; forward flexion improved from 55° to 105° and abduction from 41° to 102°
  • 13 complications in 10 patients (17%); 7 patients (12%) had failures requiring revision
  • Used a lateralised (Frankle) glenoid design rather than the medialised Grammont design
Clinical implication: Confirms reproducible pain relief and elevation gains in cuff-deficient arthritis and documents the meaningful early complication burden of RSA.
Verify on PubMed (PMID 16085607)
Evidence

Delta shoulder prosthesis for rotator cuff rupture — the original description

Grammont PM, Baulot E • Orthopedics (1993)

The original description of the Delta Mark III reverse prosthesis for rotator cuff rupture — the design that established the medialised centre of rotation principle on which all modern RSA systems build.

Evidence

Problems, complications, reoperations and revisions in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty — systematic review

Zumstein MA, Pinedo M, Old J, Boileau P • J Shoulder Elbow Surg (2011)

Systematic review quantifying the complication and revision burden of RSA — the basis for the overall complication rates quoted in patient counselling.

Evidence

Effect of humeral stem design on humeral position and range of motion in reverse shoulder arthroplasty

Lädermann A, Denard PJ, Boileau P, et al • Int Orthop (2015)

Underpins the humeral neck-shaft angle (135–145 degree modern designs versus the 155 degree Grammont) and version considerations that influence range of motion and notching.

Evidence

A history of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty

Flatow EL, Harrison AK • Clin Orthop Relat Res (2011)

Historical review of the development of RSA, from early failed designs to the successful Grammont concept.

Evidence

National joint registry shoulder arthroplasty data (AOANJRR, UK NJR, AJRR)

Source: Registry reports

Registry implant survivorship and revision benchmarks for reverse shoulder arthroplasty — the basis for the quoted 10-year survival and revision rates across aetiologies.

Editorially reviewed — transparent references and correction processPublished by OrthoVellum Medical Education TeamEditorial boardMethodologyReview policy
Educational disclosure

Educational content is reviewed for source visibility, editorial coherence, and correction readiness.

No individual clinician credential is claimed unless a named person is shown.

Verify before clinical use; this is not medical advice or a substitute for local guidance.

Procedure console
45 min
Read
0
Sections
advanced
Level
Peer-reviewed · 2026-06-20
Procedure info
Level
advanced
Read time
45 min
Updated
2026-06-20
SURGICAL APPROACHES USED
Deltopectoral Approach to Shoulder
Browse all procedures