Indications for Femoral Component Revision
Primary Indications
Aseptic Loosening (40-50%)
- Most common indication for femoral revision
- Progressive radiolucencies >2mm at bone-implant interface
- Component migration or subsidence >5mm
- Pedestal sign (bone formation distal to stem tip)
- Clinical: progressive thigh pain, groin pain, instability
Subsidence with Loss of Fixation (15-20%)
- Progressive stem migration distally indicating inadequate initial fixation
- Presents as leg shortening, thigh pain, instability
- More common with smooth stems, cemented stems, inadequate diaphyseal contact
Periprosthetic Fracture Around Femoral Component (10-15%)
- Vancouver B2 (fracture + loose stem) or B3 (fracture + poor bone stock)
- Intraoperative fractures during revision or primary surgery
- Stress fractures around loose stems
Infection (10-15%)
- Two-stage revision: first stage removes infected components, spacer placement
- Second stage is femoral revision after 6-12 weeks IV antibiotics
- Chronic PJI requiring complete component removal
Other Indications (20-25%)
- Adverse reaction to metal debris (ARMD) from modular junctions
- Stem malposition causing impingement or instability
- Recurrent instability requiring version change or offset restoration
- Modular junction failure or corrosion
- Polyethylene wear requiring stem revision for exposure
Mandatory Pre-operative Infection Workup
Laboratory Tests
- ESR >30mm/hr suspicious, >40mm/hr concerning
- CRP >10mg/L suspicious, >20mg/L concerning
- Both elevated: sensitivity 95% for infection
- Obtain 2-4 weeks after stopping antibiotics if possible
Joint Aspiration
- MANDATORY before femoral revision - cannot proceed without
- WBC >3000 cells/μL suspicious, >10,000 highly suggestive
- PMN >80% concerning for infection, >90% highly suggestive
- 14-day cultures: aerobic and anaerobic, fungi if immunosuppressed
- Alpha-defensin: sensitivity 97%, specificity 96% for PJI
- Synovial CRP >6.9mg/L highly predictive
Advanced Tests if Equivocal
- Leukocyte esterase test (LE strip test)
- Next-generation sequencing for fastidious organisms
- Sonication of removed components for biofilm organisms
Cannot Proceed to Revision if Infection Present
- Missed infection = catastrophic outcome (infected revision)
- If equivocal: treat as infected, 2-stage approach safer
- Frozen section at revision: >5 PMNs per HPF = infection
Paprosky Femoral Classification
Type I - Minimal Metaphyseal Bone Loss
- Characteristics: Minimal metaphyseal cancellous bone damage, intact diaphysis, good cortical bone stock, stable implant possible in metaphysis
- Stem Selection: Standard cementless primary or short revision stem (150-180mm)
- Fixation Strategy: Metaphyseal fixation with proximal porous coating
- Outcomes: 90-95% 10-year survival
Type II - Extensive Metaphyseal Loss, Intact Diaphysis
- Characteristics: Damaged metaphysis with cancellous loss, diaphysis intact >4cm, isthmus identifiable, cortical bone adequate
- Stem Selection: Extensively coated cementless stem (200-250mm, 6-8 inch coating)
- Fixation Strategy: Diaphyseal fixation bypassing metaphyseal defects by 2 cortical diameters
- Outcomes: 85-90% 10-year survival
Type IIIA - Severe Metaphyseal Loss, Diaphysis >4cm
- Characteristics: Severe metaphyseal destruction, diaphysis still intact >4cm, widened canal, cortical thinning
- Stem Selection: Long extensively coated stem (250-280mm) OR modular tapered fluted stem
- Fixation Strategy: Distal diaphyseal fixation, impaction bone grafting metaphysis, may need cortical strut grafts
- Outcomes: 80-85% 10-year survival
Type IIIB - Severe Meta + Proximal Diaphyseal Loss
- Characteristics: Metaphyseal AND proximal diaphyseal destruction, <4cm intact diaphysis, isthmus barely identifiable
- Stem Selection: Extra-long extensively coated (280-300mm) OR long modular tapered OR proximal femoral replacement if inadequate fixation
- Fixation Strategy: Very distal diaphyseal fixation, liberal use of strut grafts, protected weight bearing
- Outcomes: 70-80% 10-year survival
Type IV - No Identifiable Isthmus (Stovepipe Femur)
- Characteristics: Metaphyseal and diaphyseal destruction, no identifiable isthmus, widely patent canal, massive bone loss
- Stem Selection: Proximal femoral replacement (megaprosthesis) OR allograft-prosthesis composite (APC)
- Fixation Strategy: Cannot achieve stable stem fixation, distal fixation in mid/distal femur with megaprosthesis
- Outcomes: 70-75% 10-year survival
Imaging Workup
Plain Radiographs
- AP pelvis, lateral hip, FULL LENGTH AP and lateral femur (mandatory)
- Assess femoral bow, canal diameter at multiple levels, bone stock
- Identify fractures, perforations, cortical defects, cement extent
- Measure leg length discrepancy (lesser trochanter to ischial tuberosity)
- Template stem length and diameter
Scanogram
- If significant leg length discrepancy suspected
- Measures true leg lengths with magnification correction
CT Scan
- If severe bone loss for 3D assessment and planning
- Delineate extent of osteolysis, cortical defects
- Assess cement distribution and distal plugs
- Plan cortical windows if needed for cement removal
MRI
- If ARMD suspected (metal artifact reduction sequences)
- Assess soft tissue pseudotumors
- Evaluate abductor integrity
Implant Planning Checklist
Revision Stem System
- Multiple sizes and lengths available (150-300mm)
- Trial stems for each size
- Consider extensively coated, modular tapered, or both systems
Long Stems
- Have 250-300mm stems available even if templated shorter
- Better to have and not need than need and not have
Extended Trochanteric Osteotomy (ETO) Instruments
- Microsagittal saw with long blade
- Specialized osteotomes and retractors
- Plan ETO if: well-fixed cementless stem, cemented with distal cement, need distal access
Fixation Materials
- Cerclage cables (16 or 18 gauge, 316L stainless steel or titanium)
- Cable tensioner and crimpers
- Cortical strut allografts (fibular or femoral shaft)
- Morselized allograft for impaction grafting
Blood Management
- Type and cross 2-4 units
- Cell saver available
- Tranexamic acid 1g IV pre-incision, 1g at closure
Extended Trochanteric Osteotomy (ETO) Technique
Indications for ETO
Absolute Indications (40-60% of Femoral Revisions)
-
Well-Fixed Cementless Stem
- Ingrown porous coating, cannot extract without fracture
- Attempted extraction will fracture femur
- ETO allows controlled access to ingrowth interface
-
Cemented Stem with Distal Cement
- Cement extending beyond metaphysis into diaphysis
- Cannot access distal cement from proximal approach
- Need to remove all cement to avoid stress risers
-
Need for Distal Femoral Exposure
- Periprosthetic fracture requiring visualization
- Long stem insertion requiring direct visualization
- Retained distal cement or broken components
ETO Surgical Technique - Step by Step
Step 1: Mark Osteotomy with Cautery
- START 1-2cm DISTAL to GT tip (critical - do not start at GT tip)
- Starting at GT tip weakens abductor insertion, increases trochanteric escape
- Mark longitudinally along anterior-lateral femoral shaft
- Extend 10-15cm distally (longer 12-15cm if extensive distal cement)
- Mark should be on ANTERIOR 1/3 of femoral circumference
- Use fluoroscopy to confirm position and length
- Osteotomy must extend past distal cement or stem coating by 2-3cm
Step 2: Longitudinal Cortical Cuts
- Use MICROSAGITTAL SAW with long blade (150-200mm)
- Make LATERAL cut through cortex (full thickness)
- Make ANTERIOR cut through cortex (full thickness)
- Cuts define anterior 1/3 of femoral circumference
- Do NOT cut posterior cortex - this is the blood supply
- Do NOT cut more than 1/3 circumference - risk of complete fracture
- Protect soft tissues with retractors during sawing
- Copious irrigation during sawing to prevent thermal necrosis
Step 3: Complete Osteotomy Distally
- Use straight OSTEOTOMES to complete osteotomy distally
- Leave distal hinge initially intact (2-3cm)
- Then complete distal hinge with osteotome
- Now have free GT fragment attached to muscles
Step 4: Identify Muscle Pedicle Attachments
- GT remains ATTACHED to vastus lateralis anteriorly
- GT attached to gluteus medius/minimus superiorly
- These muscle attachments are VASCULAR PEDICLE
- Maintain all muscle attachments - do not detach
- Pedicle maintains viability and blood supply to GT
Step 5: Reflect GT Fragment
- GENTLY reflect GT ANTEROLATERALLY using Z-retractors
- GT fragment hinges on muscle pedicle attachment
- Now have excellent visualization of entire proximal/mid femoral canal
- Can see cement, stem, cortical defects clearly
- PROTECT SCIATIC NERVE posteriorly - at risk with excessive retraction
- Avoid excessive force - can fracture GT or femur
Advantages of ETO
- Excellent Femoral Canal Access: Full visualization from metaphysis to mid-diaphysis
- Bone Preservation: Controlled osteotomy vs aggressive extraction (prevents fracture)
- Facilitates Cement Removal: Direct access to distal cement
- Allows Canal Inspection: Can assess cortical integrity, perforations, fractures
- Enables Strut Graft Placement: Direct visualization for strut application
- Reproducible Healing: Biological healing via muscle pedicle
Disadvantages of ETO
- Non-union Risk: 5-10% non-union rate, most asymptomatic
- Trochanteric Escape: Rare <2% if proper fixation, catastrophic if occurs
- Protected Weight Bearing: Requires TDWB/PWB for 6-12 weeks
- Increased Operative Time: Adds 20-30 minutes to procedure
- Abductor Weakness: Temporary weakness until healed (3-6 months)
- Cable Complications: Cable fracture, migration, pain (5-10%)
ETO Repair Technique
Materials
- 2-3 cerclage cables (minimum 2, typically 3 for stability)
- 16 or 18 gauge cables
- 316L stainless steel or titanium cables
- Cable tensioner and crimper
Reduction
- Reduce GT fragment back to femoral shaft anatomically
- Ensure NO ROTATION - fragment must sit flush with shaft
- Check anterior and lateral cortical alignment
- Hold with bone clamps during cable placement
Cable Placement
- Cable 1: Proximal at level of GT insertion
- Cable 2: Middle of osteotomy
- Cable 3: Distal at osteotomy termination
- Space cables 1cm apart for optimal fixation
- Pass cables through drill holes in GT or around GT and femur
Cable Tensioning
- Tension sequentially from proximal to distal
- Tighten to 300-500N tension (use calibrated tensioner)
- Crimp cables securely
- Assess rigid fixation - should be no motion
Supplemental Fixation (Controversial)
- Some surgeons add 4.5mm cortical screw with washer through GT
- Provides additional rotational stability
- Others avoid due to stress riser risk
- Not mandatory if cable fixation rigid
Assessment
- Palpate osteotomy - should be rigid, no motion
- Fluoroscopy confirms anatomic reduction
- No step-off of cortices
Post-operative ETO Protocol
Weight Bearing
- Touch down weight bearing (TDWB) or partial weight bearing (20-30kg) for 6-12 weeks
- Advance to weight bearing as tolerated when radiographic healing confirmed
- Typical healing time 8-12 weeks (callus on X-ray, pain-free)
Radiographic Follow-up
- X-rays at 6 weeks: assess callus formation, cable position
- X-rays at 3 months: should be healed in most cases
- If not healed at 3 months but asymptomatic, continue protected weight bearing to 6 months
- If symptomatic non-union: revision ETO fixation with cables and bone graft
Revision Stem Types and Fixation Strategies
Type I/II - Standard and Extensively Coated Stems
Type I Reconstruction (Minimal Bone Loss)
Standard Cementless Revision Stem
- Similar to primary cementless stem with proximal porous coating
- Stem length 150-180mm
- Metaphyseal fixation with proximal ingrowth surface
- Cylindrical or anatomic design
- Sizing: final stem 0.5-1mm larger than final reamer for press fit
Insertion Technique
- Insert stem with mallet, gentle progressive taps
- Aim for neutral version (10-15° anteversion)
- Confirm fully seated (at resection level, not proud)
- Stability testing: zero subsidence with axial load
- Should feel solid metaphyseal engagement
Examples
- Zimmer Wagner Cone Stem (tapered, self-locking)
- Stryker Accolade II (metaphyseal fixation)
- DePuy Corail (HA coating, excellent track record)
Type II Reconstruction (Metaphyseal Damage, Intact Diaphysis)
Extensively Coated Cementless Stem - KEY FEATURES
- Long Porous Coating: 6-8 inches (150-200mm) of porous coating for diaphyseal scratch fit
- Cylindrical Design: Straight, non-anatomic to match diaphyseal canal
- Rough Surface: Porous coating, grit blast, or plasma spray for osseointegration
- Bypass Metaphyseal Defects: Stem extends 2 cortical diameters distal to defects
- Diaphyseal Fixation: Achieves 2cm minimum (prefer 4-7cm) scratch fit in diaphysis
- Stem Length: Typically 200-250mm
- Straight Alignment: Neutral version, follows canal axis
Critical Principle - Diaphyseal Fixation
- Metaphyseal bone CANNOT be trusted in revision
- Must achieve distal diaphyseal cortical contact (scratch fit)
- Need minimum 2cm contact (2 cortical diameters)
- Prefer 4-7cm contact for optimal stability
- Reaming to "chatter" indicates cortical contact achieved
Sizing and Insertion
- Size matches final reamer or 0.5mm larger
- Insert with mallet, progressive taps
- Stem should ENGAGE DISTALLY in diaphysis (resistance to seating)
- Proximal metaphysis will be loose (expected and acceptable)
- Confirm distal engagement with fluoroscopy (AP and lateral)
- Check stem seated to templated depth
Metaphyseal Management
- Optional: impaction bone grafting with morselized allograft
- Fills metaphyseal dead space
- May provide proximal support long-term as graft incorporates
- Not essential if distal fixation solid
Examples
- Zimmer VerSys Heritage (6 inch coating, cylindrical)
- Stryker Restoration Modular (6-8 inch coating, extensive track record)
- Link MP Reconstruction (8 inch coating, excellent survival data)
- Solution System (cylindrical, extensively porous coated)
Outcomes
- 10-year survival 85-90% if adequate fixation
- 15-year survival 80-85%
- Thigh pain in 10-20% (more than primary, usually mild)
- Subsidence most common failure if undersized
Type IIIA/IIIB - Long Extensively Coated or Modular Tapered
Type IIIA Reconstruction (Severe Metaphyseal Loss)
Option 1: Long Extensively Coated Stem
- Length 250-280mm
- Same principles as Type II but longer
- Extend well into diaphysis for fixation
- Bypass all metaphyseal defects by 2 cortical diameters
- May need to extend to distal femur
Option 2: Modular Tapered Fluted Stem (Preferred)
Components
- Distal tapered stem segment (self-locking taper in diaphysis)
- Proximal modular body (adjust offset and version intraoperatively)
- Modular neck (some systems, adjust version further)
- Longitudinal flutes (rotational stability)
Advantages
- Intraoperative adjustment of offset and version
- Compressive fit in diaphysis via taper
- Restores individual anatomy better than fixed designs
- Flutes prevent rotation
- Can optimize stability and leg length during surgery
Insertion Technique
- Insert distal tapered stem to templated depth
- Taper achieves compression fit in diaphysis
- Assess version and stability
- Assemble proximal body with chosen offset (standard, high, extra-high)
- Lock modular junction (morse taper or threaded)
- Insert final head
Examples
- Zimmer Wagner SL Revision (original modular tapered, excellent track record)
- Link Arcos Modular (similar design, good outcomes)
- Stryker Restoration Modular (modular options for offset/version)
- S-ROM (fully modular, proximal and distal components)
Impaction Bone Grafting
- Recommended for metaphyseal defects
- Morselized allograft impacted into metaphyseal defects
- Provides biological augmentation
- May incorporate and provide long-term support
- Use mesh or allograft cortical strips to contain graft
Type IIIB Reconstruction (<4cm Intact Diaphysis)
Extra-Long Stems
- Length 280-300mm
- Extend well into distal femur for fixation
- Need ANY diaphyseal contact - if none, proceed to PFR
- May combine extensively coated or modular tapered designs
- Very challenging - high failure risk if inadequate fixation
Decision Point: Stem vs PFR
- If ANY cortical contact achievable distally: extra-long stem
- If NO cortical contact (truly stovepipe femur): PFR
- Consider structural integrity: if cortex paper-thin, PFR safer
Cortical Strut Grafts - Liberal Use in Type IIIA/B
Indications
- Cortical defects or perforations
- Periprosthetic fractures
- Augmentation of thin cortex
- Stress shielding prevention
Types
- Fibular strut allografts (smaller diameter, good for hemi-circumferential)
- Femoral shaft allografts (larger diameter, circumferential coverage)
Technique
- Span defect by 2 cortical diameters proximal and distal
- Sit flush against femoral cortex
- Fix with 2-3 cerclage cables per strut
- Can place circumferential or hemi-circumferential
- Stem passes through center, strut provides cortical augmentation
Advantages
- Biological: incorporates over time
- Less stress shielding than plates
- Excellent for bridging defects
- Allows stem to bypass problematic areas
Outcomes Type IIIA/B
- Type IIIA: 80-85% 10-year survival
- Type IIIB: 70-80% 10-year survival
- Higher complication rates than Type I/II
- Subsidence and loosening more common if inadequate fixation
Type IV - Proximal Femoral Replacement (PFR)
Indications
- No identifiable isthmus (stovepipe femur)
- Massive bone loss precluding stem fixation
- Widely patent femoral canal with no cortical contact possible
- Failed attempts at stem fixation (loose immediately on table)
Proximal Femoral Replacement (Megaprosthesis) Components
Distal Stem Component
- Long stem (150-200mm) for fixation in mid/distal femoral diaphysis
- Fixed well below area of bone loss in healthy bone
- Cementless press fit OR cemented depending on bone quality
- Need good cortical contact for stability
Proximal Body Component
- Modular oncologic prosthesis body
- Articulating femoral head/neck
- Variety of lengths to restore leg length and offset
- Junction at level of osteotomy (resection level)
Collar Component
- For abductor reattachment
- Critical for stability and function
- Some designs have mesh sleeve for soft tissue ingrowth
PFR Surgical Technique
-
Determine Resection Level
- Distal to area of bone loss where healthy diaphyseal cortex present
- Typically 10-15cm below GT or at mid-femur
- Need adequate bone quality distally for stem fixation
-
Perform Femoral Osteotomy
- Transverse cut at planned resection level
- Remove proximal femur including deficient bone
-
Ream Distal Femur for Stem Fixation
- Ream distal femoral canal to cortical contact
- Need good press fit for stability
- If poor bone quality, plan cementing
-
Trial Stem Sizing
- Trial stems to confirm adequate fixation
- Assess stability - should be solid
-
Assemble Modular Prosthesis
- Choose proximal body length to restore leg length and offset
- Assemble distal stem + proximal body
- Lock modular junction securely
-
Insert Final Construct
- Insert assembled prosthesis
- Confirm distal stem fully seated
- Check stability and alignment
-
ABDUCTOR RECONSTRUCTION (Critical)
- Reattach gluteus medius/minimus to collar
- Use heavy non-absorbable sutures (2 Ethibond)
- Pass through drill holes in prosthesis or suture to mesh sleeve
- Tension abductors appropriately
- Without abductor reattachment: poor function, instability
-
Trial Reduction
- Assess stability throughout ROM
- Check leg length (should match or slightly long)
- Confirm no impingement
-
Final Head
- Large head (36-40mm) to reduce dislocation risk
- Assess final stability
Allograft-Prosthesis Composite (APC) - Alternative
Indications
- Younger patients (<60 years) where biological solution preferred
- Type IV bone loss but want to preserve option for future revision
Technique
- Structural femoral allograft (proximal femur or whole femur)
- Stem cemented through allograft and into host bone distally
- Junction between allograft and host bone fixed with plate and screws
- Abductors and soft tissues attached to allograft
Advantages
- Biological solution that may incorporate
- Restores bone stock for future revision
- More normal anatomy
Disadvantages
- Higher complication rate: non-union 10-20%, fracture 15-20%, resorption 10-15%
- Longer healing time (6-12 months for junction)
- Protected weight bearing for 3-6 months
- Infection risk 5-10%
- 10-year survival only 60-70%
Reserve for Younger Patients
- Typically <60 years
- Good soft tissue and compliance
- Understand risks and prolonged rehab
PFR Outcomes
- 10-year survival 70-75%
- Higher complication rates than standard revision
- Dislocation 10-20% (abductor insufficiency)
- Infection 5-10% (large foreign body)
- Aseptic loosening 10-15%
- Periprosthetic fracture 5-10%
- Abductor failure 15-20%
- BUT: salvage procedure when no alternative
- Allows immediate weight bearing (advantage over APC)
- Most patients satisfied despite complications
Detailed Operative Technique
Positioning and Preparation
Patient Position
- Lateral decubitus, affected side up
- Pelvis perpendicular to floor with rigid anterior and posterior supports
- Sandbags or pegboard positioning system
- Check pelvis perpendicular with alignment rod or fluoroscopy
- Affected leg free-draped for full manipulation
- Opposite leg padded and secured
Table Setup
- Radiolucent table for intraoperative fluoroscopy
- Ensure fluoroscopy C-arm can access hip and full femur
- Long revision instrument trays available (280-300mm stems)
- Cell saver setup
- Extra lighting for deep exposure
Surgical Approach
- Posterior approach (Moore/Southern) most common for revision
- Utilize previous scar if possible
- Extended Trochanteric Osteotomy (ETO) frequently required
Incision
- Utilize PREVIOUS INCISION, excise old scar tissue
- Extend 18-25cm from PSIS toward GT and distally along lateral femoral shaft
- May need to extend more distally if ETO planned or long stem required
- Can extend to 30cm for very long stems or distal fixation
Step 1: Preoperative Planning and Infection Workup
Exam Pearl
Exam Key Point: "Before femoral revision I RULE OUT INFECTION with mandatory aspiration. ESR, CRP, joint aspiration with WBC >3000 suspicious, PMN >80% concerning, 14-day cultures aerobic/anaerobic. Alpha-defensin if equivocal. Cannot proceed without ruling out infection - missing occult infection is catastrophic (infected revision). I use PAPROSKY FEMORAL classification to guide stem choice: Type I minimal loss = standard stem. Type II metaphyseal loss = extensively coated 6-8 inch for diaphyseal fixation. Type IIIA severe loss = long extensively coated or modular tapered. Type IIIB <4cm diaphysis = extra-long or PFR. Type IV no isthmus = megaprosthesis. Key principle: achieve 2cm minimum scratch fit in DIAPHYSIS for stable fixation - metaphyseal bone cannot be trusted. I obtain full-length AP and lateral femur films to assess bow, canal diameter, plan stem length. I plan ETO if well-fixed stem or cemented with distal cement."
Dangers at this step
- Missing occult infection - catastrophic (leads to infected revision, multiple further surgeries)
- Underestimating bone loss - inadequate stem length or fixation strategy chosen, early subsidence
- Not having long stems or ETO instruments available - cannot complete surgery safely, may be forced to compromise
- Wrong stem type for defect severity - Type IIIA defect with Type II stem = early loosening
- Not assessing femoral bow on full-length films - perforation risk with straight stems in bowed femurs
Step 2: Exposure and Assessment for ETO
Deep Dissection
- Incise fascia lata longitudinally in line with incision
- Split gluteus maximus in line with muscle fibers (blunt dissection)
- Extensive scar release - capsule often thick, contracted, adherent
- Tag short external rotators if present (piriformis, obturators) - often atrophic or absent in revision
- May be minimal soft tissue landmarks due to scarring
IDENTIFY SCIATIC NERVE EARLY
- Most critical step for safety
- Nerve posterior to hip joint, exits greater sciatic notch
- Typically 2cm posterior to short external rotators
- May be encased in scar tissue
- Place vessel loop for identification and protection
- Gentle dissection to free nerve from scar
- Avoid excessive traction
Capsulotomy
- Capsule often thick and contracted in revision
- May be minimal capsule remaining
- Excise thickened capsule and scar
- Send capsule for frozen section (>5 PMNs/HPF = infection)
Hip Dislocation
- Often difficult due to scar tissue
- Gentle manipulation to avoid fracture
- Femur may be loose and easily dislocate
- Or well-fixed and difficult to dislocate
- Protect sciatic nerve during manipulation
ASSESS NEED FOR ETO
Indications for ETO (Perform in 40-60% of Revisions)
- Well-fixed cementless stem - ingrown, cannot extract without fracture
- Cemented stem with cement extending distally past metaphysis
- Need for distal femoral exposure (fracture, long stem insertion)
- Severe proximal bone loss requiring improved visualization
If ETO NOT Needed
- Loose stem with minimal cement
- Cement confined to metaphysis only
- Proceed with standard extraction (Step 4)
If ETO Needed
Exam Pearl
Exam Key Point: "I assess need for ETO after exposure and dislocation. INDICATIONS: well-fixed cementless stem (will fracture if force extraction), cemented stem with distal cement (cannot access from above), need distal exposure (fracture, long stem). I perform ETO in 40-60% of femoral revisions. ETO gives EXCELLENT canal access and preserves bone vs aggressive extraction attempts that risk fracture. I ALWAYS identify sciatic nerve before ETO and place vessel loop - nerve at risk during osteotomy and subsequent GT reflection. If in doubt about need for ETO, I proceed with ETO - safer than attempting difficult extraction."
Dangers at this step
- Proceeding without ETO when needed - femoral fracture during stem extraction (1-3% if force used)
- ETO without sciatic nerve identification - nerve palsy from osteotomy or GT reflection
- Inadequate proximal exposure - cannot access femoral canal safely, limited visualization
- Not extending incision distally enough for ETO - cannot perform adequate length osteotomy
- Fracture during dislocation - treat immediately with cerclage cables and may need to modify plan
Step 3: Extended Trochanteric Osteotomy (ETO) Technique
(See detailed technique in ETO & Exposure Tab)
Exam Pearl
Exam Key Point: "ETO technique: I cut anterior 1/3 of femur for 10-15cm using microsagittal saw. START 1-2cm BELOW GT tip (not at tip - preserves abductor insertion, reduces trochanteric escape risk). Lateral and anterior cortical cuts only. GT stays attached to vastus lateralis anteriorly and abductors superiorly - this muscle pedicle maintains blood supply. Posterior cortex intact preserves additional blood supply. I gently reflect GT anterolaterally with Z-retractors - gives EXCELLENT canal access, can visualize entire proximal and mid femur clearly. Critical to extend osteotomy past distal cement/coating by 2-3cm for adequate access. At closure I repair with 2-3 cerclage cables spaced 1cm apart, tensioned to 300-500N. Non-union rate 5-10%, most heal by 3 months with protected weight bearing."
Dangers at this step
- Starting ETO at GT tip - weakens abductor insertion, higher trochanteric escape rate (up to 5% vs <2%)
- Cutting too far posteriorly (>1/3 circumference) - complete fracture through femur, devascularization
- Osteotomy too short - cannot access distal cement, defeats purpose of ETO
- Detaching muscles from GT - GT loses blood supply, guaranteed non-union
- Excessive force reflecting GT - fracture through GT or femoral shaft
- Sciatic nerve traction injury during GT reflection - nerve palsy (2-5%)
Step 4: Femoral Component Extraction
Cemented Stem Extraction (Most Challenging)
Option 1: Cement-Within-Cement Technique
- If stem loose AND cement mantle intact, well-fixed, >2mm thick
- Leave cement mantle in place
- Cement new stem into old cement mantle
- Advantages: faster, preserves bone, less risk
- Disadvantages: requires good mantle (rarely present in revision)
Option 2: Complete Cement Removal (Usually Required)
Technique
-
High-speed burr to disrupt cement (4-6mm ball-tipped burr)
- Work proximal to distal
- Careful - thermal necrosis risk, perforation risk
- Copious irrigation during burring
- Create groove in cement mantle
-
Flexible osteotomes to split cement
- Insert into burr groove
- Gentle taps to split cement from bone
- Work circumferentially around canal
-
Ultrasonic cement removal tools (if available)
- Expensive but very effective
- Vibration disrupts cement-bone interface
- Less thermal necrosis than burr
-
Cement taps to disrupt distal plug
- Use flexible cement tap to reach distal plug
- Gentle impaction to break plug loose
- Remove piecemeal
Cortical Windows for Inaccessible Cement
- If cement extends far distally and ETO inadequate access
- Create rectangular window in lateral cortex with saw
- Remove cement through window
- Replace window as cortical strut graft
- Fix with cerclage cables
Fluoroscopy Confirmation
- AP and lateral fluoroscopy to confirm all cement removed
- Residual cement = stress riser, pain, limits new stem fixation
Cementless Stem Extraction
Loose Stem (Easy)
- Usually extracts easily with slap hammer or extraction device
- Attach extractor to modular neck or morse taper
- Gentle taps on slap hammer
- Stem should come out smoothly
Well-Fixed Ingrown Stem (Difficult)
- DO NOT FORCE - will fracture femur
- If no ETO, MUST perform ETO now
- With ETO exposure:
- Use specialized curved osteotomes to disrupt ingrowth interface
- Work around entire circumference of stem
- Gentle progressive disruption
- Prosthesis extraction instruments
- Slap hammer with gentle force
- PATIENCE required - do not rush
If Cannot Extract Safely
- Leave proximal portion of stem in place
- Debride to create smooth surface
- Cement long stem past retained distal tip
- Bypass retained component by 2 cortical diameters
Exam Pearl
Exam Key Point: "Femoral component extraction: CEMENTED: cement-within-cement if mantle intact and stem loose (rarely possible), otherwise complete cement removal. I use combination of high-speed burr (careful - perforation risk, thermal necrosis), flexible osteotomes to split cement, ultrasonic tools if available. Work proximal to distal methodically. May need cortical windows if distal cement unreachable - create window, remove cement, replace window as strut graft with cables. I confirm all cement removed with fluoroscopy. CEMENTLESS: loose stems extract easily with slap hammer. Well-fixed ingrown stems NEED ETO or will fracture femur. With ETO I use curved osteotomes to disrupt ingrowth interface gently, extraction tools, patience. NEVER force extraction. Femoral perforation occurs in 2-5% during this step - treat immediately with cortical strut graft bypass."
Dangers at this step
- Femoral perforation (2-5%) during cement removal or stem extraction - MOST COMMON COMPLICATION at this step
- Femoral fracture if force extraction of well-fixed stem without ETO (1-3% if forced)
- Thermal necrosis from prolonged burring without irrigation - weakens bone, non-union
- Retained cement distally - stress riser, pain, limits new stem fixation zone
- Inadvertent propagation of cortical window into fracture - treat as fracture with strut grafts
Step 5: Femoral Bone Loss Assessment
With stem removed and cement cleared, assess TRUE BONE DEFECT
Paprosky Femoral Classification (See Indications Tab for details)
Assessment Checklist
-
Metaphyseal Bone Stock
- Any cancellous bone remaining?
- Cortical rim intact or destroyed?
- Can achieve metaphyseal fixation? (Type I only)
-
Diaphyseal Cortical Integrity
- Length of intact cortex available?
- Measure from metaphyseal-diaphyseal junction distally
- Need >4cm for Type II/IIIA
- <4cm indicates Type IIIB
- No intact cortex = Type IV
-
Canal Diameter
- Measure at isthmus (normally 10-12mm)
- Widened to 15-20mm = Type IIIA
- Widely patent >20mm = Type IIIB/IV
- "Stovepipe" femur (no isthmus) = Type IV
-
Cortical Thickness
- Probe with instrument to feel thickness
- Adequate thickness (>5mm) can support stem
- Paper-thin cortex (<3mm) needs strut augmentation
- Assess circumferentially
-
Identify Fractures
- Stress fractures common around loose stems
- Check for cracks extending from screw holes
- Palpate entire femur for motion
- Fluoroscopy if suspicious
-
Identify Perforations
- From previous surgery or current cement removal
- Probe canal to feel for cortical breach
- Fluoroscopy can help identify
-
Assess Greater Trochanter
- Attached? Fractured? Viable?
- Abductor attachment intact?
- Will influence soft tissue reconstruction
Exam Pearl
Exam Key Point: "Paprosky femoral classification guides my stem choice: Type I good bone = standard stem with metaphyseal fixation. Type II metaphyseal loss, diaphysis OK = extensively coated 6-8 inch for diaphyseal fixation. Type IIIA severe metaphyseal loss = long extensively coated or modular tapered. Type IIIB <4cm diaphysis = extra-long stem or consider PFR. Type IV no isthmus, stovepipe = PFR or allograft-prosthesis composite. CRITICAL: I assess DIAPHYSEAL BONE carefully - this is fixation site in revision. Need minimum 2cm scratch fit (prefer 4-7cm) for stable fixation. Metaphyseal bone cannot be relied upon. I probe canal to feel cortex thickness, diameter, bow. I recognize fractures or perforations immediately - changes plan to include cortical strut grafts for bypass and augmentation."
Dangers at this step
- Underestimating bone loss - stem too short, inadequate fixation, subsidence (most common failure mode)
- Not recognizing fracture - will propagate if not fixed, can extend during stem insertion
- Misclassifying as Type III when actually Type IV - stem will not achieve fixation, loosening
- Not assessing distal femur adequately - inadequate length for fixation zone, stem bottoms out
- Missing perforation - stem will exit through perforation or fail, need to bypass with strut
Step 6: Femoral Canal Preparation
Goal: Establish Distal Fixation in Healthy DIAPHYSEAL Bone
Reaming Strategy by Paprosky Type
Type I/II
- Box chisel proximally to establish entry point
- Sequential reaming from metaphysis to diaphysis
- Start small (10mm), increase by 0.5mm increments
- Ream until cortical contact ("chatter" indicates contact)
- Type I may still achieve metaphyseal fixation
- Type II bypasses metaphysis for diaphyseal fixation only
Type II/IIIA/IIIB
- SKIP metaphyseal reaming (no fixation possible there)
- Use long flexible reamers to reach diaphysis
- Entry point in line with femoral canal
- Ream progressively until cortical contact (chatter, resistance)
- Need 2cm MINIMUM (prefer 4-7cm) circumferential cortical contact
- This "scratch fit" is STABLE FIXATION in revision
- Ream straight in neutral axis of femur
Reaming Technique
- Start with appropriately sized reamer (usually 10-12mm)
- Gentle pressure, let reamer cut
- Advance slowly - do not force
- Increase size by 0.5mm when reamer passes easily
- Continue until CHATTER (indicates cortical contact)
- Resistance to further advancement (bottoming out)
- No further advancement despite pressure
Special Considerations - Bowed Femurs
- Femur has natural anterior bow
- Straight stems in bowed femurs = anterior perforation risk at bow apex
- Options:
- Smaller diameter stem (stays within canal despite bow)
- Flexible reamers that follow bow
- Accept some under-reaming to avoid perforation
- Fluoroscopy during reaming to check position
Line-to-Line Reaming
- Do NOT over-ream
- Final reamer = stem size or stem 0.5mm oversized
- Press fit achieved by stem taper or diaphyseal engaging portion
- Over-reaming weakens cortex and reduces press fit
Depth Measurement
- Check depth with ruler or depth gauge
- Compare to preoperative template
- Confirm with fluoroscopy AP and lateral
Clear Debris
- Copious irrigation and suction after each reamer pass
- Remove reaming debris
- Remove fat emboli (reduce fat embolism syndrome risk)
Type IV - No Reaming
- Canal widely patent, no cortical contact possible
- Reaming futile - will not achieve fixation
- SKIP reaming
- Plan for cemented long stem (rarely used) OR
- Proximal femoral replacement (PFR) - usual choice
Exam Pearl
Exam Key Point: "Femoral canal preparation: I ream to DIAPHYSEAL cortical contact - chatter and resistance indicates cortex reached. Need 2cm MINIMUM scratch fit (prefer 4-7cm) for stable fixation in revision. For Type I/II I may achieve some metaphyseal fixation. For Type II/III I must achieve DIAPHYSEAL fixation only - metaphyseal bone cannot be trusted, I bypass defects by 2 cortical diameters. I ream line-to-line progressive (0.5mm increments), straight alignment, gentle technique. In bowed femurs I use smaller diameter or flexible reamers to avoid anterior perforation at bow apex. Fluoroscopy confirms depth and position AP/lateral. Type IV widely patent canal - no cortical contact possible, cannot ream to fit, needs PFR instead."
Dangers at this step
- Perforation during reaming (2-5%) - especially bowed femurs, thin cortex, eccentric reaming
- Inadequate distal cortical contact - subsidence, early loosening (most common failure mode)
- Over-reaming - weakens cortex, reduces press fit, increases fracture risk
- Reaming eccentrically - varus or valgus stem position, abnormal stress distribution
- Not bypassing metaphyseal defects adequately - stress riser at defect edge, fracture risk
- Fat embolism from aggressive reaming - hypoxia, confusion, petechiae (rare but serious)
Steps 7-15: See Stem Selection Tab for Type-Specific Reconstruction Details
(Remaining steps include Type I/II reconstruction, Type IIIA/B reconstruction, Type IV PFR, trial reduction, ETO repair, closure, complications, imaging, and outcomes - see other tabs for complete details)
Complications - Recognition, Prevention, and Management
Major Complications in Femoral Revision
Additional Complications
Leg Length Discrepancy (10-15%)
- Common in revision due to bone loss, soft tissue laxity
- Aim within 1cm equality
- Some lengthening (1-2cm) acceptable for stability if nerve not tight
- Excessive lengthening (>4cm) increases sciatic nerve palsy risk (2-5%)
- Management: If noticed intraoperatively, adjust before closure. Post-operative: shoe lift if <2cm, may need revision if >3cm and symptomatic
Chronic Thigh Pain (10-20%)
- More common with extensively coated stems than primary THR (2-5%)
- Causes: distal stem tip stress transfer, inadequate proximal load transfer, micromotion
- Usually mild and improves over 1-2 years as osseointegration occurs
- Management: NSAIDs, activity modification, reassurance. If severe and persistent: re-revision (rarely needed)
DVT/PE (2-3%)
- Higher risk than primary due to longer surgery, more blood loss, revision status
- Prevention: DVT prophylaxis with LMWH or DOAC for 4-6 weeks, early mobilization, compression stockings
- Recognition: leg swelling, pain, positive Homan's sign (DVT), dyspnea, chest pain, hypoxia (PE)
- Management: Imaging (duplex ultrasound for DVT, CT angiography for PE), anticoagulation
Blood Loss and Transfusion (30-50% transfusion rate)
- Average blood loss 500-1000mL, can be higher with extensive surgery
- Prevention: Tranexamic acid 1g IV pre-incision + 1g at closure, cell saver, minimize operative time, meticulous hemostasis
- Management: Transfusion if Hb <70 or symptomatic (chest pain, SOB, tachycardia)
Heterotopic Ossification (5-10% with prophylaxis)
- Ectopic bone formation around hip
- Risk factors: revision surgery, extensive dissection, male gender, previous HO
- Prevention: Indomethacin 75mg PO daily for 6 weeks OR single-dose radiation 700 cGy within 24 hours post-op
- Management: If mild (Brooker I-II), observe. If severe (Brooker III-IV) with restricted ROM: excision after maturation (12-18 months)
Abductor Insufficiency and Trendelenburg Gait (5-10%)
- Causes: Superior gluteal nerve injury, abductor detachment or non-healing, GT non-union or escape
- Recognition: Trendelenburg gait (pelvis drops on opposite side during swing), abductor weakness
- Prevention: Protect superior gluteal nerve (avoid dissection >5cm above GT), repair abductors securely, ensure ETO healing
- Management: Physical therapy for abductor strengthening, cane use. If severe: abductor reconstruction (repair, advancement, allograft augmentation)