Skip to main content
OrthoVellumOrthopaedic Exam Prep
Pricing
About OrthoVellum
OrthoVellum
A living orthopaedic atlas

Exam-focused orthopaedic references, a question bank, viva practice, and spaced-repetition revision β€” with every clinical claim traceable to its source. Content is educational only and is not a substitute for local supervision, clinical judgement, or institutional policy.


Library

  • Clinical Topics
  • Blog
  • Site Updates
  • Content Methodology

Company

  • About Us
  • Authors & Disclosure
  • Editorial Team
  • Editorial Policy
  • Advertising Policy

Legal

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Medical Disclaimer
  • Copyright & DMCA

Support

  • Support OrthoVellum
  • Help Center
  • Contact
  • Accessibility
Evidence. Clarity. Practice.

Β© 2026 OrthoVellum. For educational purposes only.

Not medical advice. Verify clinically important information against current local guidance.

Scaphoid ORIF - Dorsal Approach (Proximal Pole)

Operative SurgeryHand & Wrist
Hand & WristAdvancedCore Procedure

Scaphoid ORIF - Dorsal Approach (Proximal Pole)

Surgical technique guide for Scaphoid ORIF - Dorsal Approach (Proximal Pole)

Procedure console
18 minutes
Read
0
Sections
advanced
Level
Peer-reviewed Β· 2026-06-20
High-yield overview

Dorsal approach through the 3rd/4th extensor compartment interval (EPL-EDC), over Lister's tubercle Β· advanced

30-50%AVN risk of the proximal pole
DorsalThe approach for the proximal pole
1-2 ICSRAVascularized graft for AVN
~90 minTypical duration
Critical Must-Knows
  • Proximal pole fractures (Herbert B3) carry a 30-50% AVN risk because the proximal pole has NO direct blood supply β€” it depends entirely on retrograde intraosseous flow from dorsal ridge vessels that the fracture interrupts.
  • The dorsal approach is chosen SPECIFICALLY for the proximal pole: it gives direct visualization of the fragment and access to the dorsal radius vessels used for a 1-2 ICSRA vascularized graft.
  • The internervous plane runs between EPL (3rd compartment) and EDC (4th compartment) β€” both posterior interosseous nerve, but different terminal branches.
  • Wrist FLEXION of 10-20 degrees (not extension) opens the dorsal scaphoid space β€” the opposite of volar approach positioning.
  • A retrograde screw (proximal-to-distal) is preferred when the fragment is greater than 25% of scaphoid length; an antegrade screw (distal-to-proximal) salvages a fragment too small for retrograde entry.
  • Preserve the dorsal ridge blood supply with minimal periosteal stripping, and plan a 1-2 ICSRA vascularized graft when pre-op MRI shows AVN (T1 dark signal) β€” 88% union versus 47% with non-vascularized fixation (Merrell).

When & Why


Indication. Operative fixation of a proximal pole scaphoid fracture through a dorsal approach, chosen when the fragment must be visualized directly and/or a vascularized graft from the dorsal radius is planned. The absolute indications are: - Displaced proximal pole fracture (Herbert B3) β€” displacement greater than 1mm.

  • Proximal pole non-union β€” failed conservative management or delayed presentation.
  • Avascular necrosis (AVN) of the proximal pole β€” requires a 1-2 ICSRA vascularized bone graft plus fixation. Relative indications are a non-displaced proximal pole fracture in a high-demand patient (athlete, manual labourer), a failed volar approach to the proximal pole (inadequate visualization or fixation), and a proximal pole fracture with a scapholunate ligament injury that allows direct SL repair at the same sitting. Contraindications. Absolute: severe comminution where the fragment is too small for any fixation (salvage may be needed) and active infection (debride first). Relative: severe osteoporosis (consider K-wire augmentation), and a waist or distal pole fracture β€” for these the volar approach is preferred for better access and to avoid the stiffness the dorsal approach can cause. Pre-operative imaging is the whole plan. - Plain radiographs β€” PA, lateral, scaphoid view (PA with ulnar deviation) and oblique.
  • CT β€” assess fragment size (can it accept a screw?), displacement, comminution and any arthritic change.
  • MRI β€” essential to assess AVN; a dark T1 signal predicts the need for a vascularized graft. Decision algorithm. (1) Fragment size β€” greater than 25% of scaphoid length is required for a retrograde screw. (2) AVN β€” if present on MRI, plan a 1-2 ICSRA vascularized graft. (3) Screw trajectory β€” retrograde (proximal-to-distal) preferred; antegrade (distal-to-proximal) if the fragment is too small. (4) Graft β€” non-vascularized cancellous for non-union without AVN; vascularized ICSRA for AVN. Equipment checklist. Mini C-arm positioned for perfect scaphoid views BEFORE draping; a headless compression screw set (lengths 16-30mm); a 0.045-inch guidewire and cannulated drill bits; K-wires for provisional fixation and joystick control; microsurgical instruments if an ICSRA graft is planned; and a wrist bump for 10-20 degrees of flexion. Consent specifically for the 30-50% AVN risk despite optimal surgery, prolonged healing (12-20 weeks), superficial radial nerve numbness or neuroma, possible EPL irritation/rupture, non-union (15-20%), and the possible need for a bone graft (and, with AVN, a vascularized graft or later salvage). Setup. Supine, arm on a hand table, forearm pronated with the wrist flexed 10-20 degrees over a bump (flexion opens the dorsal scaphoid space and brings the proximal pole into the field β€” the opposite of the volar approach). Test the C-arm for perfect PA, lateral and oblique scaphoid views BEFORE draping. Loupe magnification is recommended for nerve and vessel identification.

The Operation


The goal: expose the proximal pole through the dorsal EPL-EDC interval over Lister's tubercle, preserve the dorsal ridge blood supply, reduce the fracture anatomically, and stabilize it with a headless compression screw β€” adding a vascularized 1-2 ICSRA graft when the fragment is avascular. The exposure (Steps 1-5 below) is the heart of the operation and is laid out in full.

Scaphoid proximal pole ORIF
Dorsal approach to the scaphoid for fixation of a proximal pole fracture with a headless compression screw.Credit: OrthoVellum surgical illustration

Operative sequence

Step 1Position, landmarks & C-arm
  • Forearm pronated, wrist flexed 10-20 degrees over a bump β€” flexion opens the dorsal scaphoid space and brings the proximal pole into the field (extension closes the space and hides it).
  • Test the C-arm for perfect PA, lateral and oblique scaphoid views BEFORE draping; the proximal pole can be hard to visualize on fluoroscopy.
  • Mark Lister's tubercle β€” the palpable dorsal prominence on the distal radius separating the 3rd and 4th extensor compartments β€” and plan the incision centered on it.
  • Review the imaging: proximal pole fracture location, displacement, and proximal fragment size.
Step 2Dorsal skin incision
  • A 4cm longitudinal incision over Lister's tubercle, extending from the distal radius onto the carpus.
  • Incise skin and subcutaneous tissue; identify and protect the superficial radial nerve (SRN) branches with vessel loops β€” they cross the dorsal wrist radially and are the structure most often injured (numbness or a painful neuroma / Wartenberg syndrome).
  • Keep the incision centered on Lister's tubercle (ulnar to the main SRN branches) to minimize nerve risk.
Step 3Retinaculum β€” the internervous plane (EPL vs EDC)
  • Identify the extensor retinaculum and incise it longitudinally between the 3rd compartment (EPL) and the 4th compartment (EDC) β€” this is an internervous plane (both posterior interosseous nerve, different terminal branches).
  • Elevate retinacular flaps for later repair (repair prevents EPL bowstringing and delayed rupture).
  • Identify the tendons: EPL is a single tendon in the 3rd compartment coursing around Lister's tubercle; EDC has four tendons (plus EIP) in the 4th compartment.
Step 4Expose the capsule
  • Retract the EPL radially and the EDC tendons ulnarly to open the interval and expose the radiocarpal joint capsule over the proximal scaphoid.
  • The capsule overlies the proximal scaphoid and the scapholunate interval; the dorsal radiocarpal (DRC) and dorsal intercarpal (DIC) ligaments are visible on the capsule and must be preserved.
  • Use gentle retraction only on the EPL β€” no prolonged tension, to avoid ischemia and delayed rupture.
Step 5Capsulotomy β€” PRESERVE the dorsal blood supply (the critical step)
  • Make a careful longitudinal capsulotomy over the proximal scaphoid, creating a radially-based capsular flap that preserves the DRC and DIC ligaments.
  • CRITICAL: minimize periosteal stripping β€” the dorsal blood supply (70-80% of scaphoid vascularity) enters at the dorsal ridge (the junction of the waist and proximal pole). Use the elevator gently and remove only the soft tissue essential for visualization.
  • Identify the fracture site; for a non-union, clear the fibrous tissue. Aggressive dorsal stripping devascularizes the fragment and causes AVN.
  • Preserve the dorsal scapholunate ligament β€” keep the capsulotomy over the scaphoid and do not extend it ulnarly into the SL interval.
Step 6Assess the fragment & plan fixation
  • Assess proximal pole fragment size: a fragment greater than 25% of scaphoid length can accept a retrograde screw; a smaller fragment may need an antegrade screw or K-wire fixation.
  • Assess displacement, rotation and angulation; gently clean the fracture site of haematoma or fibrous tissue.
  • If pre-op MRI shows AVN (T1 dark signal), plan a 1-2 ICSRA vascularized graft at this stage.
Step 7Reduce the fracture
  • Reduce the fracture anatomically using: a 0.9mm K-wire joystick in the proximal fragment for rotation/angulation control, wrist positioning, and direct manipulation with an elevator or dental pick.
  • Confirm cortical alignment on all four sides with no articular step-off; provisionally stabilize with a K-wire if needed.
  • Confirm reduction on fluoroscopy β€” PA (no displacement), lateral (scapholunate angle 30-60 degrees, no DISI) and oblique (cortical alignment).
Step 8Guidewire & screw β€” retrograde technique (preferred)
  • With the fracture reduced, place the guidewire at the CENTER of the proximal pole articular surface, aiming parallel to the scaphoid long axis toward the distal pole.
  • Confirm the wire is central on ALL views β€” PA, lateral and oblique β€” before drilling. An eccentric wire causes malreduction or screw cutout.
  • Measure length (typically 20-28mm), drill with the cannulated drill, and insert a headless compression screw.
  • The screw head buries below the proximal pole articular cartilage and heals over β€” a proud head causes radiocarpal impingement. Advance until the trailing threads engage the distal fragment and compression is achieved.
Step 9Small fragment β€” antegrade alternative
  • If the proximal fragment is too small for retrograde entry (less than 25% of scaphoid), place the guidewire from the waist directed proximally into the proximal pole.
  • Ensure adequate proximal pole engagement (a minimum of 10-15mm of screw purchase).
  • The screw head sits at the waist and must be countersunk below the dorsal cortex to avoid extensor tendon irritation; this trajectory is similar to the volar approach.
Step 10Bone grafting (non-union or AVN)
  • Non-union WITHOUT AVN: non-vascularized cancellous graft from the distal radius, harvested through a window about 2cm proximal to the joint via the same incision, packed around the non-union after debridement to bleeding bone (pooled union around 88%, Pinder).
  • Non-union WITH AVN (T1 dark on MRI): a vascularized graft is essential β€” non-vascularized graft fails. Use the 1-2 ICSRA pedicled graft: identify the artery between the 1st and 2nd (or 2nd and 3rd) compartments, harvest a rectangular bone block (about 8-10mm by 15-20mm) with the arterial pedicle attached, rotate it 90 degrees into the non-union defect, and fix it with a screw into the distal scaphoid. It provides both structural support and revascularization (88% union versus 47% with screw and non-vascularized inlay/wedge fixation in AVN β€” Merrell).
Step 11Confirm fixation β€” final fluoroscopy
  • Obtain final PA, lateral and oblique views and confirm: the screw is central on all views; the screw head is buried below cartilage (retrograde) or cortex (antegrade); the fracture is anatomically reduced with no gap; there is no joint penetration; and screw length and engagement are adequate.
  • Test fracture stability under direct vision; revise now rather than accept suboptimal fixation. Document the intraoperative findings and images.
Step 12Capsular & retinacular repair
  • Irrigate thoroughly. Repair the dorsal capsule with 3-0 absorbable suture (interrupted or figure-of-eight) to restore ligamentous stability and proprioception; confirm the SL ligament is intact.
  • Repair the extensor retinaculum between the 3rd and 4th compartments β€” this is critical to prevent EPL bowstringing (loss of thumb extension power and risk of delayed rupture).
  • Confirm the EPL glides smoothly through the 3rd compartment over Lister's tubercle without catching.
Step 13Closure & thumb spica splint
  • Close subcutaneous tissue with 4-0 absorbable suture and skin with interrupted 4-0/5-0 nylon or a running subcuticular suture.
  • Apply a well-padded thumb spica splint with the wrist neutral and the thumb in the column position, with the IP joint free for motion to prevent stiffness.
  • Immobilization is longer than for waist fractures because of the proximal pole's tenuous blood supply.
Preserve the dorsal ridge blood supply

The dorsal carpal branch of the radial artery enters the scaphoid at the dorsal ridge (junction of the waist and proximal pole) and supplies 70-80% of the bone and the entire proximal pole by retrograde intraosseous flow. Create a radially-based capsular flap, use the elevator only where necessary, and preserve every attachment at the dorsal ridge. Aggressive stripping is how a fixable fragment becomes avascular.

Indication
Retrograde (proximal-to-distal)
Fragment greater than 25% of scaphoid length
Antegrade (distal-to-proximal)
Fragment less than 25% β€” too small for retrograde entry
Guidewire start
Retrograde (proximal-to-distal)
Center of the proximal pole articular surface, parallel to the scaphoid axis
Antegrade (distal-to-proximal)
From the waist, directed proximally into the proximal pole
Screw head
Retrograde (proximal-to-distal)
Buries below the proximal pole cartilage (heals over)
Antegrade (distal-to-proximal)
At the waist β€” must be countersunk below the dorsal cortex
Advantage
Retrograde (proximal-to-distal)
Best compression and purchase; direct visualization of the proximal pole
Antegrade (distal-to-proximal)
Larger entry point at the waist; salvages a small fragment
Pitfall
Retrograde (proximal-to-distal)
Proud head causes radiocarpal impingement
Antegrade (distal-to-proximal)
Inadequate proximal engagement (need 10-15mm) β€” pull-out and non-union
Retrograde vs antegrade screw for the proximal pole
Retrograde (proximal-to-distal)Antegrade (distal-to-proximal)
IndicationFragment greater than 25% of scaphoid lengthFragment less than 25% β€” too small for retrograde entry
Guidewire startCenter of the proximal pole articular surface, parallel to the scaphoid axisFrom the waist, directed proximally into the proximal pole
Screw headBuries below the proximal pole cartilage (heals over)At the waist β€” must be countersunk below the dorsal cortex
AdvantageBest compression and purchase; direct visualization of the proximal poleLarger entry point at the waist; salvages a small fragment
PitfallProud head causes radiocarpal impingementInadequate proximal engagement (need 10-15mm) β€” pull-out and non-union
Central guidewire on ALL views

Before drilling, confirm the guidewire is central on PA, lateral AND oblique fluoroscopy. An eccentric wire is the commonest cause of malreduction and screw cutout. For a retrograde screw the wire starts at the centre of the proximal pole articular surface β€” counter-intuitive, but the headless screw buries completely below cartilage and heals over.

Wrist FLEXION opens the dorsal space

The dorsal approach uses wrist flexion of 10-20 degrees, the opposite of the volar approach. Flexion opens the dorsal scaphoid space and delivers the proximal pole into the field; extension closes the space and hides the fragment.

Aftercare & Complications


Rehabilitation | Phase | Timing | Immobilisation | Therapy & monitoring | |-------|--------|----------------|----------------------| | 1 | 0-2 weeks | Thumb spica splint, wrist neutral, thumb column, IP joint FREE | Elevation, ice, finger active range of motion; suture removal at 10-14 days | | 2 | 2-8 weeks | Thumb spica CAST (longer than for a waist fracture) | Light ADLs with the splint; X-rays at 2 and 6 weeks β€” expect minimal callus (intra-articular bone) | | 3 | 8-12 weeks | Removable thumb spica IF early union signs | Hand therapy AROM and gentle strengthening; CT often needed to confirm union | | 4 | 3-6 months | Splint for heavy tasks only | Progressive strengthening and proprioception; MRI at 3-6 months if AVN is suspected (T1 signal) | Proximal pole fractures take longer to unite than waist fractures β€” typically 12-20 weeks (versus 8-12 for the waist) β€” so immobilization is extended. Plain films are often inadequate to confirm proximal pole union, so a CT is frequently required. Expected outcomes with ORIF: union in 80-85% of acute fractures, 80-90% of contralateral wrist motion, 85-95% of contralateral grip at one year, and unrestricted activity at 4-6 months after solid union. Contact sports are deferred to 6 months (later than for waist fractures). Counsel the patient that AVN can still develop in 30-50% despite optimal surgery. Complications

Avascular necrosis (AVN) β€” 30-50% risk with proximal pole fractures
Recognition
Dark T1 signal on MRI at 3-6 months, sclerosis on X-ray, persistent pain, delayed or non-union
Prevention
Minimal periosteal stripping, preserve the dorsal ridge supply, gentle handling, early diagnosis with pre-op MRI
Management
Asymptomatic: observe; with collapse: revision with a 1-2 ICSRA vascularized graft, or salvage (PRC, 4-corner fusion)
Non-union β€” 15-20% for the proximal pole (versus 5-10% for the waist)
Recognition
Persistent fracture line at 12-16 weeks, no bridging callus on CT, snuffbox tenderness
Prevention
Anatomic reduction, adequate screw compression, bone grafting for established non-union, smoking cessation, 8-10 weeks immobilization
Management
Revision ORIF with graft β€” non-vascularized if no AVN, 1-2 ICSRA vascularized if AVN present; salvage if revision fails
Scapholunate dissociation β€” iatrogenic SL ligament injury
Recognition
SL interval greater than 3mm on PA, DISI pattern on lateral (SL angle greater than 60 degrees), positive scaphoid shift test
Prevention
Capsulotomy OVER the scaphoid only, gentle manipulation, preserve the dorsal SL ligament, no instruments in the SL interval
Management
Acute: SL repair with suture anchor and temporary K-wire SL fixation; chronic: reconstruction versus salvage
Hardware complications β€” screw prominence, cutout, breakage
Recognition
Painful/palpable screw head, loss of fixation with fragment migration, rare breakage
Prevention
Adequate countersinking, central wire placement, correct screw size, measure length twice
Management
Removal after union confirmed (4-6 months); revision fixation if cutout before union; observe asymptomatic breakage after union
Superficial radial nerve injury β€” Wartenberg syndrome
Recognition
Numbness over the dorsal thumb/first web, painful Tinel sign, hypersensitivity, neuroma
Prevention
Identify SRN branches during the skin incision, protect with vessel loops, avoid cautery near the nerve, incision centered on Lister's tubercle
Management
Neuropraxia: observe 6-12 weeks with desensitization; persistent painful neuroma: excision and burial in pronator quadratus or bone
EPL rupture β€” intraoperative ischemia or postoperative bowstringing
Recognition
Loss of thumb IP extension, palpable tendon gap, dropped thumb posture
Prevention
Gentle EPL retraction (no prolonged tension), preserve its blood supply, meticulous retinaculum repair, test EPL gliding
Management
EIP to EPL tendon transfer (most common); palmaris graft if EIP absent
SNAC arthritis β€” progressive radiocarpal/midcarpal arthritis from malunion or non-union
Recognition
Progressive activity-related wrist pain, reduced grip and motion, arthritic X-ray (Stage 1 radial styloid, Stage 2 radioscaphoid, Stage 3 capitolunate)
Prevention
Anatomic reduction, achieve union, prevent malunion, early intervention for non-union
Management
Stage 1: radial styloidectomy; Stage 2: PRC versus 4-corner fusion; Stage 3: 4-corner fusion versus total wrist fusion; activity modification and NSAIDs
Major complications β€” recognition, prevention, management
ComplicationRecognitionPreventionManagement
Avascular necrosis (AVN) β€” 30-50% risk with proximal pole fracturesDark T1 signal on MRI at 3-6 months, sclerosis on X-ray, persistent pain, delayed or non-unionMinimal periosteal stripping, preserve the dorsal ridge supply, gentle handling, early diagnosis with pre-op MRIAsymptomatic: observe; with collapse: revision with a 1-2 ICSRA vascularized graft, or salvage (PRC, 4-corner fusion)
Non-union β€” 15-20% for the proximal pole (versus 5-10% for the waist)Persistent fracture line at 12-16 weeks, no bridging callus on CT, snuffbox tendernessAnatomic reduction, adequate screw compression, bone grafting for established non-union, smoking cessation, 8-10 weeks immobilizationRevision ORIF with graft β€” non-vascularized if no AVN, 1-2 ICSRA vascularized if AVN present; salvage if revision fails
Scapholunate dissociation β€” iatrogenic SL ligament injurySL interval greater than 3mm on PA, DISI pattern on lateral (SL angle greater than 60 degrees), positive scaphoid shift testCapsulotomy OVER the scaphoid only, gentle manipulation, preserve the dorsal SL ligament, no instruments in the SL intervalAcute: SL repair with suture anchor and temporary K-wire SL fixation; chronic: reconstruction versus salvage
Hardware complications β€” screw prominence, cutout, breakagePainful/palpable screw head, loss of fixation with fragment migration, rare breakageAdequate countersinking, central wire placement, correct screw size, measure length twiceRemoval after union confirmed (4-6 months); revision fixation if cutout before union; observe asymptomatic breakage after union
Superficial radial nerve injury β€” Wartenberg syndromeNumbness over the dorsal thumb/first web, painful Tinel sign, hypersensitivity, neuromaIdentify SRN branches during the skin incision, protect with vessel loops, avoid cautery near the nerve, incision centered on Lister's tubercleNeuropraxia: observe 6-12 weeks with desensitization; persistent painful neuroma: excision and burial in pronator quadratus or bone
EPL rupture β€” intraoperative ischemia or postoperative bowstringingLoss of thumb IP extension, palpable tendon gap, dropped thumb postureGentle EPL retraction (no prolonged tension), preserve its blood supply, meticulous retinaculum repair, test EPL glidingEIP to EPL tendon transfer (most common); palmaris graft if EIP absent
SNAC arthritis β€” progressive radiocarpal/midcarpal arthritis from malunion or non-unionProgressive activity-related wrist pain, reduced grip and motion, arthritic X-ray (Stage 1 radial styloid, Stage 2 radioscaphoid, Stage 3 capitolunate)Anatomic reduction, achieve union, prevent malunion, early intervention for non-unionStage 1: radial styloidectomy; Stage 2: PRC versus 4-corner fusion; Stage 3: 4-corner fusion versus total wrist fusion; activity modification and NSAIDs

Viva & Exam Focus


Mnemonic

DORSALDORSAL ACCESS

D
Dorsal ridge blood supply
Preserve at all costs β€” 70-80% of scaphoid vascularity
O
Orient the wrist in flexion
Flexion opens the dorsal scaphoid space
R
Retinaculum between EPL and EDC
3rd vs 4th compartment β€” the internervous plane
S
SRN branches protected
Vessel-loop retraction prevents a neuroma
A
Assess fragment size
Determines retrograde versus antegrade screw
L
Lister's tubercle landmark
Palpable reference between the 3rd and 4th compartments
Mnemonic

PROXIMALPROXIMAL POLE PRIORITIES

P
Preserve periosteum
Minimal stripping prevents AVN
R
Retrograde screw preferred
Best compression if the fragment is adequate
O
Oblique, PA, lateral views
Confirm a central wire on ALL fluoroscopy
X
eXtend immobilization
8-10 weeks versus 6-8 for waist fractures
I
ICSRA graft for AVN
1-2 intercompartmental supraretinacular artery
M
Monitor union with CT
Plain films are inadequate for the proximal pole
A
Antegrade alternative
If the fragment is too small for retrograde entry
L
Ligament SL preserve
Dorsal portion is the primary stabilizer of the carpal row
Five danger zones at the dorsal wrist

Each structure below can be injured during this approach β€” know its location and how to protect it.

1. Dorsal scaphoid blood supply

Enters at the dorsal ridge (junction of the waist and proximal pole) via the dorsal carpal branch of the radial artery β€” 70-80% of supply. Protect with minimal periosteal stripping, a radially-based capsular flap, and preservation of all dorsal ridge attachments.

2. Superficial radial nerve

Terminal branches cross the dorsal wrist radially in the subcutaneous tissue. Identify them during the skin incision, protect with vessel loops, avoid cautery nearby, and keep the incision centered on Lister's tubercle.

3. Scapholunate ligament

The dorsal SL ligament is the strongest portion and the primary stabilizer. Keep the capsulotomy over the scaphoid β€” do not extend ulnarly into the SL interval β€” and avoid instruments there.

4. Extensor pollicis longus

The EPL courses around Lister's tubercle with a sharp turn and is vulnerable to ischemia and rupture. Retract gently with no prolonged tension, preserve its blood supply, repair the retinaculum, and confirm smooth gliding.

5. Radiocarpal articular cartilage

The proximal scaphoid articulates with the radial fossa and is vulnerable to wire, screw and instrument penetration. Confirm wire position on fluoroscopy before drilling, measure length twice, and countersink the screw head below the articular surface.

Counsel every patient

Warn pre-operatively about the 30-50% AVN risk, the 12-20 week healing time, and the possible need for a vascularized graft or later salvage β€” even with optimal technique.

Clinical Decision Scenarios

Practise clinical reasoning and management decisions out loud

Viva scenarioStandard
Clinical prompt

β€œWhy does the proximal pole have such high AVN risk and how does this influence your surgical approach?”

Viva scenarioStandard
Clinical prompt

β€œWhat is the 1-2 ICSRA vascularized bone graft and when do you use it for proximal pole non-union?”

Viva scenarioStandard
Clinical prompt

β€œExplain the differences between retrograde and antegrade screw fixation for proximal pole fractures β€” when would you use each technique?”

Exam day cheat sheet
Scaphoid ORIF β€” dorsal approach (proximal pole): exam-day essentials

Indications

  • Displaced proximal pole fracture (Herbert B3) β€” displacement greater than 1mm
  • Proximal pole non-union; AVN of the proximal pole (needs a 1-2 ICSRA vascularized graft plus fixation)
  • Non-displaced proximal pole in a high-demand patient; failed volar approach
  • Contraindications: severe comminution (fragment too small), active infection, waist/distal pole (volar preferred)

Key anatomy

  • Blood supply: dorsal vessels (70-80%) enter at the dorsal ridge; volar vessels (20-30%) at the tubercle/waist
  • Proximal pole: NO direct supply β€” 100% retrograde intraosseous flow (30-50% AVN risk with fracture)
  • Internervous plane: EPL (3rd compartment) versus EDC (4th compartment) β€” both PIN
  • Lister's tubercle separates the 3rd and 4th compartments; dorsal SL ligament is the primary stabilizer
  • 1-2 ICSRA: intercompartmental supraretinacular artery β€” source of the vascularized graft

Critical steps

  • Position: forearm PRONATED, wrist FLEXION 10-20 degrees, C-arm BEFORE draping
  • Approach: 4cm incision over Lister's tubercle, protect SRN, retinaculum between EPL (3rd) and EDC (4th)
  • Exposure: retract EPL radial/EDC ulnar; capsulotomy over the scaphoid with MINIMAL periosteal stripping
  • Fixation: retrograde if fragment greater than 25%, antegrade if less than 25%
  • Guidewire central on PA, lateral and oblique; screw head buried below cartilage (retrograde) or cortex (antegrade)
  • Graft: non-vascularized for non-union without AVN; 1-2 ICSRA vascularized if AVN (T1 dark MRI)
  • Closure: repair capsule and retinaculum to prevent EPL bowstringing; confirm EPL glides

Danger zones

  • Dorsal scaphoid blood supply at the dorsal ridge (70-80%) β€” minimal stripping
  • Superficial radial nerve branches β€” protect with vessel loops
  • Dorsal scapholunate ligament β€” capsulotomy over the scaphoid only
  • EPL in the 3rd compartment β€” gentle retraction, repair the retinaculum
  • Radiocarpal articular cartilage β€” fluoroscopy confirms no joint penetration

Technique pearls

  • Wrist flexion (NOT extension) opens the dorsal space β€” opposite of the volar approach
  • The retrograde screw head buries in proximal pole cartilage and heals over
  • Central wire on ALL views before drilling prevents malreduction and cutout
  • Greater than 25% scaphoid length needed for retrograde; less than 25% needs antegrade
  • 1-2 ICSRA vascularized graft for confirmed AVN β€” 88% union versus 47% non-vascularized (Merrell)
  • Proximal pole union takes 12-20 weeks (versus 8-12 for the waist); CT often needed to confirm union

Complications

  • AVN (30-50%) β€” preserve the dorsal ridge supply; manage with ICSRA graft or salvage
  • Non-union (15-20%) β€” revision with graft (vascularized if AVN)
  • SL dissociation β€” capsulotomy over scaphoid only; repair if injured
  • Hardware prominence/cutout; SRN injury (Wartenberg); EPL rupture (EIP-to-EPL transfer)
  • SNAC arthritis β€” anatomic reduction prevents; salvage with PRC (early) or 4-corner/wrist fusion (late)

Post-op protocol

  • Thumb spica splint 2 weeks, then cast to 8 weeks total; IP joint FREE
  • LONGER than waist fractures due to tenuous proximal pole blood supply
  • Radiographs at 2, 6, 12, 20 weeks; CT to confirm union; MRI at 3-6 months if AVN suspected
  • Contact sports at 6 months after solid union (later than waist)
  • Monitor for AVN even with optimal surgery (30-50% risk); hardware removal rarely needed (5-10%)

Background & Evidence


Epidemiology & natural history. The proximal pole is the unforgiving part of the scaphoid: proximal pole fractures carry the highest AVN rate (30-50%) and the highest non-union rate (15-20%, versus 5-10% for the waist). Acute proximal pole fractures unite in 80-85% with ORIF (versus 60-70% non-operative), over 12-20 weeks. Left untreated, a scaphoid non-union progresses to SNAC arthritis in around 95% of cases within 10 years (Kerluke) β€” which is why achieving union matters. Pathoanatomy β€” the scaphoid blood supply (the critical concept). The scaphoid's vascularity is the key to the whole topic. The dorsal vessels (70-80%) are branches of the radial artery that enter at the dorsal ridge (junction of the middle and proximal thirds) and supply the entire proximal pole by retrograde intraosseous flow. The volar vessels (20-30%) enter at the tubercle and waist and supply only the distal 20-30%. The proximal pole has no direct blood supply β€” it is entirely dependent on retrograde flow from the dorsal ridge, so a proximal pole fracture interrupts that flow and renders the fragment avascular. This is why a dorsal exposure must minimise stripping at the dorsal ridge, while still giving access to the very same dorsal radius vessels used for ICSRA grafting. The volar approach is the least traumatic to this supply, but it cannot reach the proximal pole directly β€” hence the dorsal approach for this fracture. Surgical anatomy. The 3rd extensor compartment contains the single EPL tendon, which courses around Lister's tubercle; the 4th compartment contains the four EDC tendons plus EIP. The dorsal capsule is reinforced by the dorsal radiocarpal (DRC) and dorsal intercarpal (DIC) ligaments, and the dorsal scapholunate ligament (the strongest part of the SL complex and the primary stabilizer) sits just ulnar to the proximal scaphoid. The superficial radial nerve crosses the dorsal wrist radially; the radial artery gives off the dorsal carpal branch that supplies the scaphoid; and the 1-2 and 2-3 intercompartmental supraretinacular arteries run on the dorsal radius between compartments and are the basis of the vascularized grafts. Classification β€” SNAC arthritis staging (the long-term consequence of a missed or failed proximal pole fracture):

I
Radiographic features
Arthritis confined to the radial styloid
Typical management
Radial styloidectomy; activity modification and NSAIDs
II
Radiographic features
Radioscaphoid arthritis (scaphoid fossa of the radius)
Typical management
Proximal row carpectomy versus 4-corner fusion
III
Radiographic features
Capitolunate arthritis (midcarpal involvement)
Typical management
4-corner fusion versus total wrist fusion
SNAC arthritis β€” radiographic staging
StageRadiographic featuresTypical management
IArthritis confined to the radial styloidRadial styloidectomy; activity modification and NSAIDs
IIRadioscaphoid arthritis (scaphoid fossa of the radius)Proximal row carpectomy versus 4-corner fusion
IIICapitolunate arthritis (midcarpal involvement)4-corner fusion versus total wrist fusion

Outcomes & comparative evidence. With ORIF, acute proximal pole fractures achieve 80-85% union over 12-20 weeks; functional recovery is around 80-90% of contralateral wrist motion (extension most affected by the dorsal approach) and 85-95% of contralateral grip at one year, with 80-85% good-to-excellent results at 5 years. The dorsal approach is recommended specifically for the proximal pole (better visualization and ICSRA access, at the cost of a higher stiffness rate than the volar approach). Biomechanically, retrograde and antegrade screws achieve equivalent compression with perfect central placement; the choice is driven by fragment size. For a confirmed AVN proximal fragment, a vascularized graft roughly doubles union compared with non-vascularized fixation (Merrell); across all non-unions the two graft types are broadly similar (Pinder), so the vascularized advantage is concentrated in AVN.

References


Evidence

The vascularity of the scaphoid bone

Level V
Gelberman RH, Menon J β€’ J Hand Surg Am (1980)
Key Findings:
  • Cadaveric injection study (15 specimens): 70-80% of intraosseous vascularity and the ENTIRE proximal pole are supplied by radial artery branches entering through the dorsal ridge
  • 20-30% of the bone (distal tuberosity region) is supplied by volar radial artery branches; the proximal pole receives no direct volar supply
  • The authors noted the volar operative approach is least traumatic to the proximal pole blood supply
Clinical implication: The proximal pole depends entirely on retrograde intraosseous flow from dorsal ridge vessels, explaining its high AVN risk. A dorsal exposure must minimise periosteal stripping at the dorsal ridge to avoid devascularising the fragment, while still providing access to the same dorsal radius vessels used for ICSRA grafting.
Verify on PubMed (PMID 7430591)
Evidence

Treatment of scaphoid nonunions: quantitative meta-analysis of the literature

Level III
Merrell GA, Wolfe SW, Slade JF 3rd β€’ J Hand Surg Am (2002)
Key Findings:
  • Systematic quantitative meta-analysis of 36 eligible studies from 1,121 screened
  • For AVN of the proximal fragment, union was 88% with a vascularized graft versus 47% with screw and inlay/wedge non-vascularized fixation
  • For unstable non-unions, screw fixation with grafting (94%) was superior to K-wires and wedge grafting (77%); solid screw fixation did not require postoperative immobilization
Clinical implication: A vascularized graft should be strongly preferred when the proximal fragment is avascular, where it nearly doubles union compared with non-vascularized fixation. Rigid headless screw compression with grafting is the workhorse construct.
Verify on PubMed (PMID 12132096)
Evidence

Treatment of scaphoid nonunion: a systematic review of the existing evidence

Level III
Pinder RM, Brkljac M, Rix L, Muir L, Brewster M β€’ J Hand Surg Am (2015)
Key Findings:
  • Systematic review with meta-analysis of proportions: 48 studies, 1,602 patients
  • Vascularized and non-vascularized grafts had similar pooled union (92% versus 88%); distal radius and iliac crest grafts were comparable (89% versus 87%) but iliac crest had more donor-site complications
  • Screw and K-wire fixation gave higher union (88% and 91%) than no fixation (79%); no surgical approach was statistically superior
Clinical implication: Across all-comers there is no proven superior approach or graft type, so technique should be tailored to the lesion. The vascularized-graft advantage is concentrated in confirmed proximal-pole AVN rather than every non-union; the dorsal distal radius is a low-morbidity local donor site.
Verify on PubMed (PMID 26116095)
Evidence

A new vascularized bone graft for scaphoid nonunion (1-2 ICSRA)

Level IV
Zaidemberg C, Siebert JW, Angrigiani C β€’ J Hand Surg Am (1991)
Key Findings:
  • Original description of a consistent distally based vascularized graft from the dorsoradial distal radius (the 1-2 intercompartmental supraretinacular artery pedicle)
  • Cadaveric latex-injection anatomy plus a clinical series of 11 long-standing non-unions treated with good results
  • Offered shorter immobilization and higher union than conventional inlay grafting in this series
Clinical implication: Defines the workhorse pedicled dorsal radius graft used through the same dorsal proximal-pole approach, delivering both structural support and revascularization without microsurgical anastomosis.
Verify on PubMed (PMID 1861030)
Evidence

A capsular-based vascularized distal radius graft for proximal pole scaphoid pseudarthrosis

Level IV
Sotereanos DG, Darlis NA, Dailiana ZH, Sarris IK, Malizos KN β€’ J Hand Surg Am (2006)
Key Findings:
  • 13 proximal pole non-unions (10 with AVN) treated with a capsular-based dorsal distal radius vascularized graft plus Herbert screw
  • 10 of 13 overall and 8 of 10 AVN cases achieved solid union at a mean 19 months
  • No donor-site morbidity; the technique avoids dissection of a small-caliber pedicle or microsurgical anastomosis
Clinical implication: A simple local dorsal radius vascularized graft gives results comparable to pedicled or free grafts for proximal-pole AVN non-union, but also tempers expectations β€” roughly one in five proximal-pole non-unions still fail to unite, so patients must be counselled accordingly.
Verify on PubMed (PMID 16632051)
Evidence

Treatment of scaphoid fractures and nonunions

Kawamura K, Chung KC β€’ J Hand Surg Am (2008)
Key Findings:
  • Comprehensive review of scaphoid fracture treatment
  • Proximal pole fractures have the highest AVN rate (30-50%) and non-union rate (15-20%), requiring specialized surgical approaches
Evidence

The significance of the 1-2 intercompartmental supraretinacular artery (1-2 ICSRA) as a distally pedicled dorsal wrist bone flap

Megerle K, Bertel D, Germann G, Lehnhardt M, Kall S, Sauerbier M β€’ J Hand Surg Eur Vol (2011)
Key Findings:
  • Detailed anatomic study of the 1-2 ICSRA vascularized graft technique
  • Used for proximal pole non-union with AVN
Evidence

Minimally invasive management of scaphoid nonunions

Slade JF 3rd, Dodds SD β€’ Clin Orthop Relat Res (2006)
Key Findings:
  • Describes percutaneous and limited open techniques for scaphoid ORIF
  • Includes the dorsal approach for proximal pole fractures with retrograde screw fixation
Evidence

Management of the fractured scaphoid using a new bone screw

Herbert TJ, Fisher WE β€’ J Bone Joint Surg Br (1984)
Key Findings:
  • Original description of the headless compression screw for scaphoid fixation
  • Defines the Herbert classification of scaphoid fractures (B3 = proximal pole)
Evidence

Non-union of the scaphoid: treatment with cannulated screws compared with treatment with Herbert screws

Trumble TE, Clarke T, Kreder HJ β€’ J Bone Joint Surg Am (1996)
Key Findings:
  • Randomized trial of cannulated versus Herbert screws for scaphoid non-union
  • Headless compression screws achieve 85-90% union for scaphoid non-unions with appropriate bone grafting
Evidence

Vascularized bone grafts for scaphoid nonunions and Kienbock's disease

Shin AY, Bishop AT β€’ Orthop Clin North Am (2001)
Key Findings:
  • Review of vascularized bone graft options for scaphoid AVN
  • Covers pedicled ICSRA grafts and free medial femoral condyle grafts
Evidence

Nonunion of the scaphoid: a critical analysis of recent natural history studies

Kerluke L, McCabe SJ β€’ J Hand Surg Am (1993)
Key Findings:
  • Natural history study of untreated scaphoid non-unions
  • Untreated non-unions progress to SNAC arthritis in around 95% of cases within 10 years β€” emphasizing the importance of achieving union
Editorially reviewed β€” transparent references and correction processPublished by OrthoVellum Medical Education TeamEditorial boardMethodologyReview policy
Educational disclosure

Educational content is reviewed for source visibility, editorial coherence, and correction readiness.

No individual clinician credential is claimed unless a named person is shown.

Verify before clinical use; this is not medical advice or a substitute for local guidance.

Procedure console
18 minutes
Read
0
Sections
advanced
Level
Peer-reviewed Β· 2026-06-20
Procedure info
Level
advanced
Read time
18 minutes
Updated
2026-06-20
SURGICAL APPROACHES USED
Dorsal Approach to Distal Radius
Browse all procedures