Hand & Upper Limb

Shoulder Arthrodesis

Glenohumeral arthrodesis for brachial plexus palsy, failed arthroplasty, irreparable rotator cuff with deltoid loss, infection, and flail shoulder โ€” FRCS/FRACS exam preparation

Core Procedure
advanced
By OrthoVellum Medical Education Team

Reviewed by OrthoVellum Editorial Team

Editorial maintenance, source checking, and correction workflow โ€ข Published by OrthoVellum Medical Education Team

High-yield overview

Glenohumeral fusion for brachial plexus palsy, deltoid loss, failed arthroplasty | advanced

Surgical Imaging

Critical Exam Points โ€” Shoulder Arthrodesis

Fusion Position โ€” The Numbers

The single most examined fact about shoulder arthrodesis.

  • Abduction: 15โ€“30ยฐ (arm away from body)
  • Forward Flexion: 15โ€“25ยฐ (arm slightly in front of coronal plane)
  • Internal Rotation: 40โ€“50ยฐ (hand positioned to reach mouth and perineum)

Why these angles? Combined with scapulothoracic motion (60ยฐ+ scapular rotation), the fused shoulder achieves approximately 90ยฐ of functional forward elevation. Internal rotation of 40โ€“50ยฐ allows the hand to reach the perineum, lower back, and mouth via flexion-abduction arc.

Malposition consequence: Excessive abduction = arm abducts at side awkwardly. Excessive IR = hand cannot reach away from body. Insufficient IR = hand cannot reach perineum.

Deltoid Preservation

The deltoid's INNERVATION is lost in most indications โ€” but the deltoid MUSCLE must be PRESERVED as a biological sleeve and padding.

In brachial plexus palsy: deltoid is denervated but not excised. It provides soft tissue coverage and padding over the hardware.

In revision arthroplasty with deltoid detachment: if the deltoid origin is detached and cannot be repaired, functional outcomes of arthrodesis are significantly worse.

The motor for post-arthrodesis elevation is the SCAPULAR ROTATORS โ€” serratus anterior (long thoracic nerve) and trapezius. These MUST be intact and functional.

Without functioning scapular muscles, arthrodesis simply fuses a useless joint and provides no functional improvement.

Non-union โ€” Most Common Complication

Non-union occurs in 10โ€“15% โ€” the highest-risk complication of shoulder arthrodesis.

Risk factors:

  • Inadequate bone contact (key technical factor)
  • Rigid fixation absent or inadequate
  • Smoking (double the non-union risk)
  • Prior radiation to the shoulder
  • Infection
  • Charcot arthropathy

Diagnosis: persistent pain 6 months after surgery; CT confirms โ€” radiolucent line persisting at fusion site.

Management: Bone grafting (iliac crest autograft) + revision fixation with longer or better-positioned plate. Electrical bone stimulation as adjunct (limited evidence). Non-union of shoulder arthrodesis is a serious complication requiring major revision surgery.

Plate Selection and Fixation

A long contoured plate spanning from the acromion/spine of scapula to the proximal humerus is the gold standard.

The plate must bridge the glenohumeral joint and be anchored proximally to the scapular spine or acromion and distally to the humeral shaft.

Why long? The weight of the arm creates an enormous bending moment at the fusion site. A short plate spanning only the glenohumeral joint is insufficient โ€” the lever arm of the arm will fail the fixation.

Typically a 3.5mm or 4.5mm reconstruction plate contoured to span:

  • Scapular spine or acromion (proximal fixation)
  • Across the prepared glenohumeral fusion site
  • Down the proximal to mid-humerus (distal fixation)

Supplementary screws across the glenohumeral joint, and iliac crest bone graft, are standard.

Brachial Plexus Palsy โ€” Core Indication

Brachial plexus palsy is the most common indication for shoulder arthrodesis worldwide.

Why arthrodesis? In complete brachial plexus palsy affecting the shoulder:

  • Deltoid is paralysed (axillary nerve, C5โ€“C6)
  • Rotator cuff is paralysed
  • The glenohumeral joint is a flail, unstable, painful joint

Post-arthrodesis function: Scapulothoracic muscles (trapezius, serratus anterior) remain functional (long thoracic nerve, accessory nerve). After fusion, scapular rotation provides functional elevation and positioning of the hand.

Best results when: (1) serratus anterior and trapezius are intact; (2) elbow and hand function is preserved; (3) patient is young and motivated.

Chammas 2004 (PMID 15274265): landmark comparative series on brachial plexus arthrodesis outcomes โ€” arthrodesis improved function in both upper and total palsy, and crucially even in patients with a flail hand, provided active elbow flexion had been restored first.

When NOT to Perform Arthrodesis

Contraindications โ€” know these for the examiner's 'trap' scenario:

  1. Bilateral shoulder disease โ€” patient cannot use crutches, perform perineal hygiene, or dress independently if both shoulders are fused
  2. Contralateral shoulder problems โ€” same reasoning; one shoulder must function normally
  3. Non-functioning scapular muscles (serratus anterior, trapezius) โ€” fusion is futile without scapular rotation
  4. Active infection โ€” relative; may fuse in some controlled infection scenarios but high risk
  5. Severe osteoporosis โ€” fixation may not hold
  6. Charcot arthropathy โ€” high non-union risk

The examiner's trap: Candidate proposes arthrodesis for bilateral brachial plexus palsy โ€” WRONG. The patient would have no functional upper limbs.

Mnemonic

F-U-S-I-O-NFUSION โ€” The Key Elements of Shoulder Arthrodesis

Mnemonic

B-R-A-C-H-I-A-LBRACHIAL โ€” Brachial Plexus Arthrodesis Patient Selection

Indications for Shoulder Arthrodesis

Primary Indications

1. Brachial Plexus Palsy (Most Common Indication)

  • Complete or near-complete brachial plexus injury affecting C5โ€“C6 (deltoid and rotator cuff)
  • Flail, painful, unstable glenohumeral joint
  • Prerequisite: functioning serratus anterior (long thoracic nerve, C5โ€“C7) and trapezius (accessory nerve, CN XI)
  • Elbow and hand function should ideally be preserved to benefit from shoulder positioning
  • Chammas 2004 (PMID 15274265): Comparative series of 27 patients (11 upper palsy with a functional hand, 16 total palsy with a flail hand). Both groups gained function after glenohumeral fusion; a flail hand did NOT compromise the post-operative active range of movement, and pectoralis major strength was the key prognostic factor for hand excursion and shoulder strength. Prerequisite in every case was restored active elbow flexion before fusion.

2. Failed Shoulder Arthroplasty

  • Failed TSA or RSA with irreparable glenoid bone loss, periprosthetic infection, or multiple revision failures
  • Requires functioning serratus anterior and trapezius
  • More complex due to bone loss โ€” may require structural allograft

3. Irreparable Rotator Cuff Tear with Deltoid Loss

  • Combined loss of both deltoid AND rotator cuff โ€” neither TSA nor RSA is possible
  • Classic scenario: prior deltoid detachment failure plus irreparable cuff
  • RSA requires functioning deltoid; TSA requires intact cuff โ€” if BOTH lost, arthrodesis is the only reconstructive option

4. Infection / Septic Arthritis / Chronic Osteomyelitis

  • Uncontrolled septic glenohumeral joint where arthroplasty is contraindicated
  • May be performed as a salvage once infection eradicated
  • Higher non-union risk in previously irradiated or infected tissue

5. Flail Shoulder โ€” Various Causes

  • Tumour resection (proximal humerus or scapula with glenohumeral involvement)
  • Paralytic conditions (poliomyelitis, upper motor neuron lesion)
  • Severe post-traumatic bone and soft tissue loss

6. Recurrent Glenohumeral Instability with Severe Bone Loss

  • Bipolar bone loss (humeral and glenoid) where instability surgery is not feasible
  • Rare indication โ€” most instability managed by soft tissue or bone procedures

When NOT to Perform Arthrodesis

Absolute Contraindications:

  • Bilateral shoulder disease (patient cannot use crutches or perform personal hygiene)
  • Non-functioning scapular muscles (fusion achieves nothing without scapulothoracic motion)
  • Active uncontrolled infection at the operative site

Relative Contraindications:

  • Significant contralateral shoulder disease
  • Severe osteoporosis (fixation may fail)
  • Charcot arthropathy (high non-union risk)
  • Patient unable to comply with prolonged post-op immobilisation

Key Evidence

Rowe CR (1974) โ€” PMID 4847239 (J Bone Joint Surg Am 1974;56(5):913-22). Classic re-evaluation of arm position in shoulder arthrodesis. Rowe argued AGAINST the historically high abduction angles then in use and advocated comparatively modest abduction (measured from the side of the body, NOT from the scapular plane), with the central message that excessive abduction leaves the arm protruding and impairs comfort and crutch use.

Cofield RH, Briggs BT (1979) โ€” PMID 457712 (J Bone Joint Surg Am 1979;61(5):668-77). Seventy-one shoulders, mean follow-up nine and a half years, all with internal fixation. The achieved mean position was approximately 45ยฐ abduction, 25ยฐ flexion and 25ยฐ rotation; relief of pain was adequate in three-quarters and 82% felt they had benefited. Importantly, in this series the exact position of fusion had little effect on outcome โ€” three-quarters could reach the trunk, half could reach the head, one-quarter could do light work at shoulder level.

Modern consensus position โ€” Contemporary teaching favours a lower-profile position than the older 45ยฐ abduction, commonly summarised as the "rule of 30s" (approximately 30ยฐ abduction, 30ยฐ flexion, 30ยฐ internal rotation) or the slightly modified range used here (15โ€“30ยฐ abduction, 15โ€“25ยฐ flexion, 40โ€“50ยฐ internal rotation). The unifying principle, not the precise degrees, is examinable: enough abduction/flexion for the hand to reach the face via scapular rotation, and enough internal rotation to reach the perineum and midline.

Chammas M et al. (2004) โ€” PMID 15274265 (J Bone Joint Surg Br 2004;86(5):692-5). Comparison of 27 patients (upper vs total brachial plexus palsy). Glenohumeral arthrodesis improved function in both groups; a flail hand did not reduce post-operative range of movement, and pectoralis major strength was the significant prognostic factor for hand excursion and shoulder strength. Confirms brachial plexus palsy as a core indication, with restored elbow flexion as the prerequisite.


Clinical Decision Scenarios

Use these scenarios to practise clinical reasoning and management decisions

CLINICAL SCENARIOAdvanced

CLINICAL PROMPT

"A 28-year-old man sustained a right brachial plexus injury in a motorcycle accident 18 months ago. He has a completely flail shoulder with no deltoid or rotator cuff function but intact elbow flexion and hand function. EMG confirms no reinnervation at the shoulder. He is right-handed. What are his surgical options and what is your recommended management?"

PRACTICAL APPROACH
This young man has a **complete, non-recovering brachial plexus injury to the shoulder (C5โ€“C6 level)** with preserved distal function. The key assessment findings are: - Flail shoulder: no deltoid, no rotator cuff - 18 months post-injury with no EMG reinnervation โ€” recovery is extremely unlikely - Preserved elbow flexion and hand function โ€” critical, as this means shoulder positioning will be functionally beneficial **Assessment Prerequisites Before Recommending Arthrodesis:** 1. **Serratus anterior and trapezius function** โ€” MANDATORY. Ask patient to attempt elevation; look for scapular rotation. Winging suggests serratus palsy โ€” if present, arthrodesis will not achieve functional elevation. I would confirm with EMG. 2. **Contralateral shoulder status** โ€” must be normal. If contralateral shoulder also involved, bilateral arthrodesis is contraindicated. 3. **Patient expectations and motivation** โ€” must understand the procedure is salvage, not restoration. **Surgical Options:** 1. **Shoulder arthrodesis** โ€” if serratus and trapezius functioning: best option for restoring shoulder positioning and useful arm placement for hand function. Post-fusion, scapulothoracic rotation achieves approximately 60โ€“90ยฐ elevation. 2. **Brachial plexus reconstruction** โ€” nerve grafting or nerve transfer. At 18 months with no EMG recovery, nerve reconstruction is generally too late (reinnervation requires 12โ€“18 months before end-organ fibrosis). Not appropriate at this time point. 3. **Tendon transfers** โ€” limited role without a functioning proximal motor. 4. **Observation with orthosis** โ€” if no surgery desired; functional orthosis to support the flail arm. **Recommended Management โ€” Shoulder Arthrodesis:** Indication: C5โ€“C6 brachial plexus palsy, flail shoulder, 18 months with no recovery, intact serratus and trapezius (assumed), intact distal function. **Fusion position:** - Abduction: 20โ€“25ยฐ (within 15โ€“30ยฐ range) - Forward flexion: 20ยฐ (within 15โ€“25ยฐ range) - Internal rotation: 45ยฐ (within 40โ€“50ยฐ range) This allows the hand (with intact elbow and hand function) to reach the mouth and perineum. **Technique:** - Posterior approach - Thorough surface preparation (humeral head, glenoid, acromion) - Iliac crest autograft - Long contoured plate from scapular spine to proximal humeral shaft - Spica or custom orthosis for 6โ€“12 weeks **Expected outcomes (Chammas 2004, PMID 15274265; Atlan 2012, PMID 22464233):** - Reliable functional gain in brachial plexus palsy once elbow flexion is restored, even with a flail hand - Active scapulothoracic motion of roughly 60ยฐ abduction and approximately 45โ€“50ยฐ rotation in most patients - Significant functional improvement in reach and hand positioning, with pectoralis major power predicting hand excursion
CLINICAL SCENARIOAdvanced

CLINICAL PROMPT

"What is the optimal fusion position for shoulder arthrodesis and how do you justify each component biomechanically?"

PRACTICAL APPROACH
The optimal fusion position for shoulder arthrodesis is the **Cofield modified position**, now accepted as the modern standard: **The Three Components:** **1. Abduction: 15โ€“30ยฐ (target approximately 20โ€“25ยฐ)** - Places the arm slightly away from the side - Combined with 60ยฐ of scapulothoracic rotation, achieves approximately 80โ€“90ยฐ of functional elevation - Why NOT more abduction? Older recommendations used markedly higher abduction (Cofield's historical series averaged around 45ยฐ) โ€” this was found to be too much; patients cannot sleep comfortably, cannot use crutches, and the arm protrudes awkwardly from the side - Why NOT less? Less than 15ยฐ means the arm is effectively at the side with no elevation available from scapular rotation **2. Forward Flexion: 15โ€“25ยฐ (target approximately 20ยฐ)** - Positions the arm slightly in front of the coronal plane - This allows the hand to reach the face (especially the mouth) when combined with scapular rotation - Without forward flexion, the hand reaches sideways โ€” not toward the face - Biomechanically: aligns the arm with the forward plane of activity (reaching for objects, perineal hygiene) **3. Internal Rotation: 40โ€“50ยฐ (target approximately 45ยฐ)** - This is the most clinically critical component for patient function - 40โ€“50ยฐ IR achieves: - Hand to perineum (essential for hygiene) - Hand to lower back - Hand to mouth (combined with abduction and flexion) - Thumb upward for functional grip positioning - Why NOT neutral or external rotation? With external rotation, the hand faces outward โ€” the patient cannot reach the perineum, cannot place hand in the midline, and function is severely compromised - Why NOT more internal rotation (greater than 50ยฐ)? The hand faces too far back and medially โ€” cannot reach forward **Practical Intraoperative Verification:** - With elbow at 90ยฐ, forearm should point approximately toward the face โ€” confirms abduction and flexion - Forearm in same position should also reach down toward the perineum โ€” confirms IR component - Patient should be able to place hand on top of head โ€” confirms elevation reserve **The mnemonic:** 'Hand to mouth AND perineum' โ€” if the position achieves both, it is correct. **Historical context:** - Rowe 1974 (PMID 4847239): re-evaluated arm position and argued against the high abduction angles then in vogue, measuring abduction from the side of the body - Cofield & Briggs 1979 (PMID 457712): 71 shoulders fused at a mean of approximately 45ยฐ abduction, 25ยฐ flexion, 25ยฐ rotation โ€” and found the exact position had little effect on outcome - Modern consensus: a lower-profile position, often taught as the 'rule of 30s' (โ‰ˆ30ยฐ/30ยฐ/30ยฐ) or the range used here (15โ€“30ยฐ abduction, 15โ€“25ยฐ flexion, 40โ€“50ยฐ IR); the functional principle matters more than the precise degree
CLINICAL SCENARIOAdvanced

CLINICAL PROMPT

"A patient develops non-union of a shoulder arthrodesis 8 months post-operatively. CT confirms a fibrous union with no bridging bone at the glenohumeral site. The plate appears intact. What is your management?"

PRACTICAL APPROACH
This is a **non-union of shoulder arthrodesis** โ€” the most common complication, occurring in 10โ€“15% of cases. At 8 months with CT-confirmed absence of bridging bone, this will not consolidate spontaneously. **Initial Assessment:** 1. **Rule out infection**: Inflammatory markers (CRP, ESR, WBC), aspiration if suspicious. CT appearance may suggest infective vs aseptic non-union (gas, periosteal reaction, soft tissue changes). 2. **Assess hardware**: Is the plate intact or fractured? Are screws loose? X-ray and CT to evaluate fixation. 3. **Review original position**: Was the position correct? If the fusion consolidated in the correct position after revision, will outcomes be acceptable? 4. **Modifiable risk factors**: Smoking (cessation mandatory before revision), diabetes (glycaemic control), nutrition, any medications causing bone loss (bisphosphonate, steroids). **Management Strategy โ€” Surgical Revision:** Indications for revision: confirmed non-union with functional disability and/or pain, no infection, patient fit for surgery. **Surgical technique:** 1. **Takedown of fibrous tissue**: Remove fibrous interposition tissue at the non-union site 2. **Surface preparation**: Refresh the bone surfaces โ€” debride to bleeding cancellous bone on both sides of the non-union 3. **Bone grafting โ€” mandatory**: Iliac crest autograft is first choice (cancellous + corticocancellous). If deficient bone stock, consider structural femoral head allograft. 4. **Revision fixation**: Replace or supplement the plate with a longer, better-positioned plate. Address any screw loosening โ€” change to different screw holes or use longer screws. Consider adding a separate plate or additional screws. 5. **Re-check fusion position**: This is an opportunity to correct malposition if present. **Adjuvant measures:** - Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound (LIPUS) or electrical bone stimulation โ€” limited evidence but used as adjuncts - Bone marrow aspirate concentrate injection at non-union site (emerging evidence) **Post-operative:** - Shoulder spica or custom orthosis for 12 weeks minimum after revision - Strict non-weight-bearing of the arm - Repeat CT at 6 months to confirm union **Expected outcomes of revision:** Revision non-union surgery achieves union in approximately 70โ€“80% of cases. Results are less predictable than primary arthrodesis. Patient should be counselled accordingly.

Shoulder Arthrodesis โ€” Exam Summary

Clinical summary

Key Evidence

Glenohumeral arthrodesis. Operative and long-term functional results

Level IV
Cofield RH, Briggs BT โ€ข J Bone Joint Surg Am
Clinical Implication: A landmark long-term outcome series confirming that rigid internal fixation gives reliable single-stage fusion with durable pain relief. It tempers dogmatic insistence on precise fusion angles โ€” broad, sensible positioning matters more than a single 'correct' figure.

Glenohumeral arthrodesis in upper and total brachial plexus palsy. A comparison of functional results

Level III
Chammas M, Goubier JN, Coulet B, Reckendorf GM, Picot MC, Allieu Y โ€ข J Bone Joint Surg Br
Clinical Implication: Establishes brachial plexus palsy as a core indication and clarifies patient selection: restore elbow flexion first, and a flail hand is not in itself a contraindication. Residual pectoralis major power predicts how far the hand can be positioned after fusion.

Functional outcome of glenohumeral fusion in brachial plexus palsy: a report of 54 cases

Level III
Atlan F, Durand S, Fox M, Levy P, Belkheyar Z, Oberlin C โ€ข J Hand Surg Am
Clinical Implication: The strongest modern evidence that graft strategy drives union: a structural subacromial corticocancellous graft dramatically lowers non-union rate. This is the single most actionable technical lesson for preventing the commonest complication.

Glenohumeral arthrodesis after failed prosthetic shoulder arthroplasty

Level IV
Scalise JJ, Iannotti JP โ€ข J Bone Joint Surg Am
Clinical Implication: In the salvage-of-failed-arthroplasty setting, arthrodesis gives meaningful pain and function gains but is technically demanding with a high reoperation and non-union burden โ€” counsel patients accordingly and plan for structural grafting.

References

  1. Rowe CR. Re-evaluation of the position of the arm in arthrodesis of the shoulder in the adult. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1974;56(5):913-922. PMID 4847239

  2. Cofield RH, Briggs BT. Glenohumeral arthrodesis. Operative and long-term functional results. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1979;61(5):668-677. PMID 457712

  3. Chammas M, Goubier JN, Coulet B, Reckendorf GM, Picot MC, Allieu Y. Glenohumeral arthrodesis in upper and total brachial plexus palsy. A comparison of functional results. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2004;86(5):692-695. PMID 15274265 ยท doi:10.1302/0301-620x.86b5.13549

  4. Scalise JJ, Iannotti JP. Glenohumeral arthrodesis after failed prosthetic shoulder arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90(1):70-77. PMID 18171959 ยท doi:10.2106/JBJS.G.00203

  5. Atlan F, Durand S, Fox M, Levy P, Belkheyar Z, Oberlin C. Functional outcome of glenohumeral fusion in brachial plexus palsy: a report of 54 cases. J Hand Surg Am. 2012;37(4):683-688. PMID 22464233 ยท doi:10.1016/j.jhsa.2012.01.012