Subpectoral Biceps Tenodesis

Sports MedicineAdvancedCore Procedure

Subpectoral Biceps Tenodesis

Open subpectoral biceps tenodesis technique for long head of biceps tendinopathy, instability and partial tears — axillary-fold incision, groove debridement, interference screw or cortical button fixation, length-tension restoration, nerve protection

High-yield overview

Open subpectoral tenodesis of the long head of biceps tendon | advanced

Surgical Imaging

Critical Danger Structures and Exam Traps
Musculocutaneous Nerve

Location: Emerges from the lateral cord 5-8 cm distal to the coracoid, pierces coracobrachialis 3-5 cm medial to the tenodesis site, then continues as the lateral cutaneous nerve of the forearm.

Risk: Excessive medial retraction or blind medial dissection can stretch or lacerate the nerve. Injury produces biceps weakness, elbow flexion weakness, and sensory loss over the lateral forearm.

Protection: Limit medial retraction to the minimum required; use blunt retractors only; identify the nerve if dissection extends medial to the short head of biceps.

Axillary Nerve

Location: Courses posteriorly around the surgical neck of the humerus 2-3 cm superior to the inferior border of pectoralis major insertion. Lies deep to the deltoid fascia.

Risk: Superior retraction of the pectoralis major or aggressive superior dissection places the nerve at risk. Injury causes deltoid paralysis and lateral shoulder numbness.

Protection: Identify the inferior border of pectoralis major and stay inferior to it; do not place retractors superior to the tenodesis site without direct visualisation.

Radial Nerve and Deep Brachial Vessels

Location: The radial nerve and profunda brachii artery lie in the spiral groove on the posterior humerus, approximately 2-3 cm medial and deep to the tenodesis site when the arm is in neutral rotation.

Risk: Over-zealous medial retraction or a drill that penetrates the posterior cortex can injure these structures. Radial nerve injury produces wrist drop and sensory loss in the first dorsal web space.

Protection: Maintain direct visualisation during drilling; use a drill stop; avoid medial retraction beyond the short head of biceps.

Humeral Fracture Through Tunnel

Location: The anterior humeral cortex at the inferior border of the bicipital groove is the weakest point after tunnel creation.

Risk: Tunnel diameter greater than 8 mm, eccentric placement, or a cortical button hole that acts as a stress riser significantly increases fracture risk. Postoperative fracture typically occurs through the tunnel within 6-12 weeks.

Prevention: Limit tunnel diameter to 7-8 mm; centre the tunnel in the anterior cortex; consider prophylactic cerclage if using a cortical button in osteopenic bone.

Length-Tension Mismatch

Error: Placing the tenodesis too proximal (short tendon) produces an over-tensioned muscle belly that sits high and causes pain. Placing it too distal (long tendon) leaves residual groove symptoms and a cosmetic Popeye appearance.

Landmark: With the arm adducted at the side in neutral rotation, the superior border of the biceps muscle belly should lie exactly at the inferior border of the pectoralis major insertion.

Fix: Mark the tendon at the planned tenodesis level before cutting; after fixation confirm the muscle belly position matches the landmark.

Residual Bicipital Groove Pathology

Problem: Suprapectoral tenodesis leaves 3-5 cm of diseased intra-groove tendon that continues to generate pain. Subpectoral tenodesis removes this entire segment.

Evidence: Studies show 20-30 percent of patients with proximal tenodesis have persistent groove pain requiring revision; subpectoral revision resolves symptoms in greater than 85 percent of cases.

Technique: After tendon release, deliver the entire intra-groove portion into the wound and resect it; thoroughly debride the groove of synovitis and osteophytes before fixation.

Mnemonic

N.E.R.V.E.SNERVES — Subpectoral Tenodesis Danger Zones

Mnemonic

T.E.N.O.D.E.S.I.STENODESIS — Operative Sequence

Surgical Indications

Primary Indications for Subpectoral Tenodesis

  • Symptomatic long head of biceps tendinopathy refractory to 3-6 months of non-operative care (activity modification, NSAIDs, corticosteroid injection into the groove)
  • Biceps instability or subluxation from the bicipital groove (medial subluxation over the lesser tuberosity on dynamic ultrasound or MRI)
  • Partial thickness tears greater than 25-50 percent of tendon diameter with persistent pain
  • SLAP tear type II or IV in patients older than 40 years where repair is unlikely to succeed and tenodesis is preferred
  • Failed proximal (suprapectoral or arthroscopic) tenodesis with residual groove pain

Tenodesis versus Tenotomy — Decision Thresholds

  • Tenodesis preferred when the patient is younger than 60, participates in heavy labour or overhead sport, or strongly desires to avoid cosmetic deformity and cramping.
  • Tenotomy acceptable in older, lower-demand patients who accept the 30-50 percent risk of Popeye deformity and occasional cramping.
  • Tenodesis eliminates the risk of Popeye deformity and reduces cramping to less than 10 percent; tenotomy carries a 30-50 percent deformity rate and 20-40 percent cramping rate.

Contraindications

Absolute:

  • Active infection in the shoulder or axilla
  • Inability to comply with postoperative sling and rehabilitation protocol

Relative:

  • Severe glenohumeral osteoarthritis where arthroplasty is indicated (consider concomitant tenodesis during arthroplasty)
  • Poor bone quality precluding secure fixation (consider alternative fixation or tenotomy)

Evidence Base

Tenodesis versus Tenotomy

Multiple Level I and II studies demonstrate that tenodesis provides superior cosmesis and lower cramping rates with equivalent pain relief and function scores. A 2023 meta-analysis of 12 RCTs found no difference in Constant or ASES scores but a 40 percent absolute risk reduction in Popeye deformity with tenodesis.

Subpectoral versus Suprapectoral Tenodesis

Subpectoral tenodesis removes the entire intra-groove diseased segment. Suprapectoral techniques leave 3-5 cm of tendon in the groove. A 2022 prospective cohort showed 25 percent of suprapectoral patients required revision for residual groove pain versus 4 percent after subpectoral tenodesis. Subpectoral revision resolved symptoms in 87 percent of cases.

Fixation Method Comparison

Interference screw fixation provides the highest load-to-failure in biomechanical studies (greater than 200 N). Cortical button and dual suture anchor techniques are biomechanically acceptable (150-180 N) and have lower risk of tunnel fracture. Clinical outcomes are equivalent across methods when length-tension is restored.

Tenodesis versus Tenotomy — Evidence Summary


Key Evidence

Evidence

Biceps tenodesis versus tenotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of level I randomized controlled trials

Level I
Belk JW, Kraeutler MJ, Houck DA, Chrisman AN, Scillia AJ, McCarty ECJ Shoulder Elbow Surg
Clinical implication: Tenodesis is preferred when cosmesis and avoidance of cramping are priorities; tenotomy remains acceptable in older, lower-demand patients.
Evidence

Complications associated with subpectoral biceps tenodesis: low rates of incidence following surgery

Level III
Nho SJ, Reiff SN, Verma NN, Slabaugh MA, Mazzocca AD, Romeo AAJ Shoulder Elbow Surg
Clinical implication: Subpectoral tenodesis is safe with low complication rates when tunnel diameter is limited to 8 mm and length-tension is restored.
Evidence

Open subpectoral biceps tenodesis in patients over 65 does not result in an increased rate of complications

Level III
Voss A, Cerciello S, DiVenere J, Solovyova O, Dyrna F, Apostolakos J, Lam D, Cote MP, Beitzel K, Mazzocca ADBMC Musculoskelet Disord
Clinical implication: Age over 65 should not be considered a contraindication to subpectoral biceps tenodesis when indicated.
Evidence

All-suture anchor and unicortical button show comparable biomechanical properties for onlay subpectoral biceps tenodesis

Biomechanical
Otto A, Siebenlist S, Baldino JB, Murphy M, Muench LN, Mehl J, Obopilwe E, Cote MP, Imhoff AB, Mazzocca ADJSES Int
Clinical implication: All-suture anchors and unicortical buttons are biomechanically equivalent options for subpectoral biceps tenodesis fixation.

Clinical Decision Scenarios

Practise clinical reasoning and management decisions out loud

Viva scenarioAdvanced
Clinical prompt

A 48-year-old manual labourer presents with 9 months of anterior shoulder pain and a palpable click in the bicipital groove. MRI shows partial tearing of the long head of biceps with medial subluxation. He has failed two corticosteroid injections. How do you counsel him regarding tenodesis versus tenotomy and which technique do you recommend?

Practical approach
This patient has symptomatic biceps instability with partial tearing refractory to non-operative care. Given his age, occupation, and desire to avoid deformity, I recommend subpectoral biceps tenodesis rather than tenotomy. **Tenodesis versus tenotomy counselling**: Tenotomy carries a 30-50 percent risk of Popeye deformity and 20-40 percent risk of activity-related cramping. Tenodesis reduces these risks to less than 5 percent and less than 10 percent respectively, with equivalent pain relief and functional scores. In a manual labourer who values cosmesis and strength, tenodesis is strongly preferred. **Why subpectoral rather than suprapectoral**: The subpectoral approach removes the entire diseased intra-groove tendon segment. Suprapectoral techniques leave 3-5 cm of tendon in the groove, which is the source of residual groove pain in 20-30 percent of patients. Subpectoral revision resolves symptoms in greater than 85 percent of failed proximal cases. **Fixation choice**: I prefer a 7-8 mm interference screw for its superior biomechanical strength (greater than 200 N load-to-failure). I will restore anatomic length-tension using the pectoralis major inferior border landmark. Tunnel diameter will be limited to 8 mm to minimise fracture risk. **Postoperative plan**: Sling for 4 weeks, no active elbow flexion against resistance. Progressive strengthening from week 8. Return to heavy labour at 4-6 months when strength reaches 80 percent of contralateral side.
Viva scenarioAdvanced
Clinical prompt

You are performing a subpectoral biceps tenodesis. After creating the 8 mm humeral tunnel you notice the drill has penetrated the posterior cortex. What do you do and how do you prevent this complication in the future?

Practical approach
Posterior cortical penetration during tunnel creation risks injury to the radial nerve and profunda brachii artery lying in the spiral groove 2-3 cm deep to the anterior cortex. **Immediate actions**: Stop drilling. Inspect the posterior cortex directly if possible. Assess for brisk bleeding or any neurological change. If bleeding is controlled and there is no neurological deficit, proceed with tendon fixation using a shorter screw or alternative method (cortical button or anchors) that does not require full tunnel depth. If there is uncontrolled bleeding or neurological change, extend the approach to explore and protect the radial nerve and vessels. **Prevention strategy**: Always use a drill stop set at 18-20 mm. Confirm the drill trajectory is perpendicular to the anterior cortex. Visualise the posterior cortex after drilling. In osteopenic bone or when using a cortical button, consider prophylactic cerclage or choose an anchor-only technique to avoid a large unicortical tunnel. **Documentation**: Clearly document the penetration, the steps taken, and the final fixation method used. Counsel the patient postoperatively regarding the event and any monitoring required.
Viva scenarioAdvanced
Clinical prompt

A 52-year-old patient is 4 months after subpectoral biceps tenodesis with an interference screw. He has excellent pain relief but complains that his biceps muscle looks 'too high' and feels tight with overhead activity. What is the diagnosis and how do you manage it?

Practical approach
This patient has an over-tensioned biceps tenodesis. The muscle belly sits proximal to the anatomic landmark (inferior border of pectoralis major), producing a high-riding appearance and pain with stretch or overhead activity. **Diagnosis confirmation**: On examination with the arm at the side in neutral rotation, the superior border of the biceps muscle belly lies greater than 1 cm proximal to the inferior pectoralis major border. MRI or ultrasound can confirm the tendon insertion is too proximal. **Management**: If symptoms are mild and the patient is satisfied with cosmesis, observation and activity modification may suffice. If pain or cosmetic concern is significant, revision tenodesis is indicated. At revision, the tendon is released, the tunnel is debrided, and the tendon is re-fixed at the correct length-tension using the pectoralis major landmark. Alternative fixation (cortical button or anchors) may be used if the original tunnel is enlarged or compromised. **Prevention in primary surgery**: Always mark the tendon at the correct length before cutting. Confirm the muscle belly position visually after fixation with the arm at the side. Over-tensioning is the most common technical error and is difficult to salvage without revision.
Exam day cheat sheet
Subpectoral Biceps Tenodesis — Exam Day Summary

References

Evidence

Biceps tenodesis versus tenotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of level I randomized controlled trials

Level I
Belk JW, Kraeutler MJ, Houck DA, Chrisman AN, Scillia AJ, McCarty ECJ Shoulder Elbow Surg
Clinical implication: Tenodesis is preferred when cosmesis and avoidance of cramping are priorities; tenotomy remains acceptable in older, lower-demand patients.
Evidence

Complications associated with subpectoral biceps tenodesis: low rates of incidence following surgery

Level III
Nho SJ, Reiff SN, Verma NN, Slabaugh MA, Mazzocca AD, Romeo AAJ Shoulder Elbow Surg
Clinical implication: Subpectoral tenodesis is safe with low complication rates when tunnel diameter is limited to 8 mm and length-tension is restored.
Evidence

Open subpectoral biceps tenodesis in patients over 65 does not result in an increased rate of complications

Level III
Voss A, Cerciello S, DiVenere J, Solovyova O, Dyrna F, Apostolakos J, Lam D, Cote MP, Beitzel K, Mazzocca ADBMC Musculoskelet Disord
Clinical implication: Age over 65 should not be considered a contraindication to subpectoral biceps tenodesis when indicated.
Evidence

All-suture anchor and unicortical button show comparable biomechanical properties for onlay subpectoral biceps tenodesis

Biomechanical
Otto A, Siebenlist S, Baldino JB, Murphy M, Muench LN, Mehl J, Obopilwe E, Cote MP, Imhoff AB, Mazzocca ADJSES Int
Clinical implication: All-suture anchors and unicortical buttons are biomechanically equivalent options for subpectoral biceps tenodesis fixation.
Editorially reviewed — transparent references and correction processPublished by OrthoVellum Medical Education TeamEditorial boardMethodologyReview policy
Educational disclosure

Educational content is reviewed for source visibility, editorial coherence, and correction readiness.

No individual clinician credential is claimed unless a named person is shown.

Verify before clinical use; this is not medical advice or a substitute for local guidance.