Open subpectoral tenodesis of the long head of biceps tendon | advanced
Surgical Imaging
Location: Emerges from the lateral cord 5-8 cm distal to the coracoid, pierces coracobrachialis 3-5 cm medial to the tenodesis site, then continues as the lateral cutaneous nerve of the forearm.
Risk: Excessive medial retraction or blind medial dissection can stretch or lacerate the nerve. Injury produces biceps weakness, elbow flexion weakness, and sensory loss over the lateral forearm.
Protection: Limit medial retraction to the minimum required; use blunt retractors only; identify the nerve if dissection extends medial to the short head of biceps.
Location: Courses posteriorly around the surgical neck of the humerus 2-3 cm superior to the inferior border of pectoralis major insertion. Lies deep to the deltoid fascia.
Risk: Superior retraction of the pectoralis major or aggressive superior dissection places the nerve at risk. Injury causes deltoid paralysis and lateral shoulder numbness.
Protection: Identify the inferior border of pectoralis major and stay inferior to it; do not place retractors superior to the tenodesis site without direct visualisation.
Location: The radial nerve and profunda brachii artery lie in the spiral groove on the posterior humerus, approximately 2-3 cm medial and deep to the tenodesis site when the arm is in neutral rotation.
Risk: Over-zealous medial retraction or a drill that penetrates the posterior cortex can injure these structures. Radial nerve injury produces wrist drop and sensory loss in the first dorsal web space.
Protection: Maintain direct visualisation during drilling; use a drill stop; avoid medial retraction beyond the short head of biceps.
Location: The anterior humeral cortex at the inferior border of the bicipital groove is the weakest point after tunnel creation.
Risk: Tunnel diameter greater than 8 mm, eccentric placement, or a cortical button hole that acts as a stress riser significantly increases fracture risk. Postoperative fracture typically occurs through the tunnel within 6-12 weeks.
Prevention: Limit tunnel diameter to 7-8 mm; centre the tunnel in the anterior cortex; consider prophylactic cerclage if using a cortical button in osteopenic bone.
Error: Placing the tenodesis too proximal (short tendon) produces an over-tensioned muscle belly that sits high and causes pain. Placing it too distal (long tendon) leaves residual groove symptoms and a cosmetic Popeye appearance.
Landmark: With the arm adducted at the side in neutral rotation, the superior border of the biceps muscle belly should lie exactly at the inferior border of the pectoralis major insertion.
Fix: Mark the tendon at the planned tenodesis level before cutting; after fixation confirm the muscle belly position matches the landmark.
Problem: Suprapectoral tenodesis leaves 3-5 cm of diseased intra-groove tendon that continues to generate pain. Subpectoral tenodesis removes this entire segment.
Evidence: Studies show 20-30 percent of patients with proximal tenodesis have persistent groove pain requiring revision; subpectoral revision resolves symptoms in greater than 85 percent of cases.
Technique: After tendon release, deliver the entire intra-groove portion into the wound and resect it; thoroughly debride the groove of synovitis and osteophytes before fixation.
N.E.R.V.E.SNERVES — Subpectoral Tenodesis Danger Zones
T.E.N.O.D.E.S.I.STENODESIS — Operative Sequence
Surgical Indications
Primary Indications for Subpectoral Tenodesis
- Symptomatic long head of biceps tendinopathy refractory to 3-6 months of non-operative care (activity modification, NSAIDs, corticosteroid injection into the groove)
- Biceps instability or subluxation from the bicipital groove (medial subluxation over the lesser tuberosity on dynamic ultrasound or MRI)
- Partial thickness tears greater than 25-50 percent of tendon diameter with persistent pain
- SLAP tear type II or IV in patients older than 40 years where repair is unlikely to succeed and tenodesis is preferred
- Failed proximal (suprapectoral or arthroscopic) tenodesis with residual groove pain
Tenodesis versus Tenotomy — Decision Thresholds
- Tenodesis preferred when the patient is younger than 60, participates in heavy labour or overhead sport, or strongly desires to avoid cosmetic deformity and cramping.
- Tenotomy acceptable in older, lower-demand patients who accept the 30-50 percent risk of Popeye deformity and occasional cramping.
- Tenodesis eliminates the risk of Popeye deformity and reduces cramping to less than 10 percent; tenotomy carries a 30-50 percent deformity rate and 20-40 percent cramping rate.
Contraindications
Absolute:
- Active infection in the shoulder or axilla
- Inability to comply with postoperative sling and rehabilitation protocol
Relative:
- Severe glenohumeral osteoarthritis where arthroplasty is indicated (consider concomitant tenodesis during arthroplasty)
- Poor bone quality precluding secure fixation (consider alternative fixation or tenotomy)
Evidence Base
Tenodesis versus Tenotomy
Multiple Level I and II studies demonstrate that tenodesis provides superior cosmesis and lower cramping rates with equivalent pain relief and function scores. A 2023 meta-analysis of 12 RCTs found no difference in Constant or ASES scores but a 40 percent absolute risk reduction in Popeye deformity with tenodesis.
Subpectoral versus Suprapectoral Tenodesis
Subpectoral tenodesis removes the entire intra-groove diseased segment. Suprapectoral techniques leave 3-5 cm of tendon in the groove. A 2022 prospective cohort showed 25 percent of suprapectoral patients required revision for residual groove pain versus 4 percent after subpectoral tenodesis. Subpectoral revision resolved symptoms in 87 percent of cases.
Fixation Method Comparison
Interference screw fixation provides the highest load-to-failure in biomechanical studies (greater than 200 N). Cortical button and dual suture anchor techniques are biomechanically acceptable (150-180 N) and have lower risk of tunnel fracture. Clinical outcomes are equivalent across methods when length-tension is restored.
Tenodesis versus Tenotomy — Evidence Summary
Key Evidence
Biceps tenodesis versus tenotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of level I randomized controlled trials
Complications associated with subpectoral biceps tenodesis: low rates of incidence following surgery
Open subpectoral biceps tenodesis in patients over 65 does not result in an increased rate of complications
All-suture anchor and unicortical button show comparable biomechanical properties for onlay subpectoral biceps tenodesis
Clinical Decision Scenarios
Practise clinical reasoning and management decisions out loud
“A 48-year-old manual labourer presents with 9 months of anterior shoulder pain and a palpable click in the bicipital groove. MRI shows partial tearing of the long head of biceps with medial subluxation. He has failed two corticosteroid injections. How do you counsel him regarding tenodesis versus tenotomy and which technique do you recommend?”
“You are performing a subpectoral biceps tenodesis. After creating the 8 mm humeral tunnel you notice the drill has penetrated the posterior cortex. What do you do and how do you prevent this complication in the future?”
“A 52-year-old patient is 4 months after subpectoral biceps tenodesis with an interference screw. He has excellent pain relief but complains that his biceps muscle looks 'too high' and feels tight with overhead activity. What is the diagnosis and how do you manage it?”