Skip to main content
OrthoVellumOrthopaedic Exam Prep
Pricing
About OrthoVellum
OrthoVellum
A living orthopaedic atlas

Exam-focused orthopaedic references, a question bank, viva practice, and spaced-repetition revision β€” with every clinical claim traceable to its source. Content is educational only and is not a substitute for local supervision, clinical judgement, or institutional policy.


Library

  • Clinical Topics
  • Blog
  • Site Updates
  • Content Methodology

Company

  • About Us
  • Authors & Disclosure
  • Editorial Team
  • Editorial Policy
  • Advertising Policy

Legal

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Medical Disclaimer
  • Copyright & DMCA

Support

  • Support OrthoVellum
  • Help Center
  • Contact
  • Accessibility
Evidence. Clarity. Practice.

Β© 2026 OrthoVellum. For educational purposes only.

Not medical advice. Verify clinically important information against current local guidance.

THA Revision - Acetabular Component (Jumbo Cup/Augments)

Operative SurgeryArthroplasty
ArthroplastyIntermediateCore Procedure

THA Revision - Acetabular Component (Jumbo Cup/Augments)

Comprehensive surgical technique for revision acetabuloplasty using jumbo cups and augments for Paprosky II/IIIA defects with detailed operative steps, complications, and exam-focused clinical scenarios

Procedure console
28
Read
0
Sections
intermediate
Level
Peer-reviewed Β· 2026-06-20
High-yield overview

Complex reconstruction for a failed acetabular component in Paprosky II/IIIA bone loss Β· High difficulty

arthroplastySubspecialty
14Operative steps
5Danger structures
120-180minTypical duration
Critical Must-Knows
  • The Paprosky classification drives reconstruction. Contained or segmental defects with intact columns (Type II and IIIA) are suitable for a jumbo cup; Type IIIB with pelvic discontinuity is NOT β€” it needs a cage, cup-cage or custom triflange.
  • A jumbo cup is defined (Mayo) by an outer diameter of at least 62mm in women and at least 66mm in men, or at least 10mm larger than the normal contralateral acetabulum (Gustke). Implant it 4 to 6mm oversized.
  • Aim for 50 to 60 percent host bone contact (medialize to the anatomic centre if needed) and a minimum of 4 to 6 supplemental screws clustered in the superior dome and ischium for primary stability.
  • Match the defect to the reconstruction: cavitary (contained) defects take impaction bone grafting; segmental rim defects take trabecular metal augments fixed with multiple screws.
  • Place screws only in the safe zones β€” superior dome and posterior column β€” and avoid the anterior column (external iliac vessels) and the posteroinferior quadrant (sciatic nerve).
  • Use a dual mobility liner in revision to cut the dislocation rate from 10 to 15 percent down to 2 to 5 percent.

When & Why


Indication. Revision of a failed acetabular component where the bone loss is reconstructable with a cementless porous jumbo cup β€” typically Paprosky Type II and IIIA defects β€” performed for aseptic loosening, progressive periprosthetic osteolysis, recurrent instability needing a larger effective head, or a failed constrained liner. The defining requirement is that enough host bone remains (about 50 to 60 percent contact) and that both columns are intact. Defects suitable for a jumbo cup: - Paprosky II β€” moderate bone loss with intact columns, superior migration less than 2cm, cavitary or contained segmental defects, distorted but identifiable landmarks, 40 to 60 percent bone stock remaining.

  • Paprosky IIIA β€” superior migration 2 to 3cm above the obturator line with loss of the anterosuperior or posterosuperior rim, but Kohler's line intact (medial wall competent), the teardrop still identifiable, and less than 50 percent bone stock with the columns still continuous. Absolute contraindications. Active infection (requires a staged protocol), established pelvic discontinuity (Type IIIB β€” needs a cage or custom implant), superior migration more than 4cm (the biomechanical centre is then too high), non-reconstructible columns requiring structural allograft, or medical unfitness for major revision surgery. Relative contraindications. Severe osteoporosis compromising screw purchase, prior pelvic radiotherapy, neurological disease affecting compliance with protected weight-bearing, severe soft-tissue compromise from multiple prior operations, and the young active patient in whom a biological reconstruction is preferred where possible. The one decision that matters β€” which defect gets which reconstruction:
Jumbo cup (this operation)

Paprosky II/IIIA with intact columns and 50 to 60 percent host-bone contact achievable. A 4 to 6mm oversized porous cup plus screws, with augments or graft for the defects.

Trabecular metal cup + augments

Poor bone quality (osteoporosis, irradiated, metabolic bone disease) or borderline contact β€” porous tantalum ingrowths even with less host bone, and the augments restore the rim.

Cage, cup-cage or custom triflange

Paprosky IIIB or pelvic discontinuity. A jumbo cup alone fails here β€” the construct must bridge the discontinuity with a cage or a custom triflange implant.

Consent specifically for dislocation (the commonest complication), periprosthetic infection, sciatic or common-peroneal palsy, leg-length inequality, re-revision for loosening, vascular injury (rare but catastrophic), heterotopic ossification, and the protected weight-bearing commitment of several months. Preoperative optimization & setup. Exclude infection first β€” ESR, CRP (and IL-6 if available), with hip aspiration if markers are raised; alpha-defensin if equivocal. Obtain a fine-cut CT (1 to 2mm) with metal-artefact reduction and 3D reconstruction to quantify bone loss, plan cup and augment size, and map safe screw trajectories and the external iliac vessels. Medically optimize (haemoglobin over 110 g/L, albumin, HbA1c less than 7 percent, nutrition) and plan extended thromboprophylaxis for 35 days. Position lateral decubitus for the posterior/posterolateral approach (most common and most versatile), supine for the anterior approach, with all pressure points padded and fluoroscopy available.

The Operation


The goal is to remove the failed component and all cement and membrane without creating new bone loss, confirm the defect is reconstructable (and not a pelvic discontinuity), restore the anatomic hip centre, achieve a rigid press-fit jumbo cup with 50 to 60 percent host-bone contact and supplemental screws in the safe zones, manage cavitary and segmental defects with graft and augments, and reconstruct with a stable bearing β€” almost always a dual mobility liner in the revision setting.

Jumbo cup acetabular revision
Acetabular revision with a jumbo cup and augment to manage segmental bone loss.Credit: OrthoVellum surgical illustration

Operative sequence

Step 1Position, approach & field preparation
  • Lateral decubitus for the posterior/posterolateral approach (most versatile for acetabular revision); supine for an anterior or anterolateral approach. Bean-bag with pelvic supports, all pressure points padded, fluoroscopy available.
  • Re-use the previous incision where possible (extend proximally or distally as needed β€” avoid parallel incisions). An extended trochanteric osteotomy is added only if a concurrent femoral revision is needed.
  • Waterproof adhesive drape to prevent skin strike-through, double-glove with a planned change after component extraction, antibiotic-impregnated drape if available, and a cell saver set up for blood conservation.
Step 2Exposure through the previous incision
  • Sharp dissection through scar layers, developing the interval through a gluteus maximus split or in line with its fibres.
  • The abductor mechanism is often scarred to the lateral pelvis; piriformis and the short external rotators may be attenuated or absent; the previous capsule is typically adherent to the cup.
  • Allow only 1 to 2cm of skin undermining to avoid necrosis; protect the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve superiorly in anterior approaches. Heterotopic bone limiting exposure is best excised after component removal.
Step 3Capsulectomy & pseudocapsule excision
  • Systematic circumferential excision of the fibrous pseudocapsule (it carries high concentrations of wear debris and inflammatory cells); preserve the abductor insertion on the greater trochanter when intact and tag any substantial capsular tissue for later repair.
  • Release adhesions between femoral neck and acetabular rim and expose the component from rim to rim.
  • Send at least 5 tissue samples for culture (aerobic, anaerobic, fungal) and a membrane specimen for histology β€” before antibiotics if infection is suspected. Use separate instruments after excision to minimize contamination.
Step 4Dislocate & deliver the femoral head
  • For an isolated acetabular revision, gently dislocate the hip (flexion 90 degrees, internal rotation), levering the head anteriorly with a curved retractor on the posterior aspect, and deliver the femoral neck into the wound.
  • If a femoral revision is concurrent, resect the neck with an oscillating saw perpendicular to the femoral axis at the level of the lesser trochanter (more proximal if the stem is well-fixed).
  • A stiff or ankylosed hip from massive heterotopic bone needs an in-situ neck osteotomy before any dislocation attempt β€” gentle sequential release prevents an iatrogenic femoral fracture.
Step 5Extract the acetabular component
  • Cementless cup: identify the cup-bone interface with thin curved osteotomes, working sequentially around the whole periphery; use a high-speed burr or a Gigli saw (passed behind the cup through the obturator foramen) for a well-fixed cup, then apply an Explant device with progressive gentle taps β€” never sudden violent force.
  • Cemented cup: remove the polyethylene liner first, then work curved gouges between the metal shell and cement mantle (the cement-cup interface is usually easier than cement-bone); use ultrasonic tools for residual mantle and preserve bone stock.
  • Expect bone loss with extraction β€” plan for it. Morcellize a polyethylene liner that blocks access before extracting it.
Step 6Remove cement & membrane
  • Systematic removal of all cement fragments and particulate debris using sharp curettes (rongeurs push cement deeper); ultrasonic cement removal for an adherent mantle, and curettage of any pseudotumor if metallosis is present.
  • Pulsatile lavage (3L minimum) between steps until healthy bleeding cancellous bone is visualized.
  • Retained cement is a nidus for persistent inflammation and infection β€” expect to spend 15 to 20 minutes on thorough debridement.
Step 7Assess the defect (intraoperative Paprosky)
  • Measure superior migration from the inter-teardrop line; check Kohler's line integrity (medial wall); palpate the anterior column and the posterior column through the sciatic notch; document rim deficiency by clock-face position.
  • Intraoperative classification frequently differs from the preoperative CT β€” finger palpation gives the best assessment of column integrity.
  • Critical stress test: lever on the ischium. If the ilium moves independently, that is a pelvic discontinuity (Type IIIB) β€” abandon the jumbo cup and convert to a cage, cup-cage or custom triflange.
Step 8Ream the medial wall & dome
  • Sequential hemispherical reaming starting 4 to 8mm larger than the extracted cup, in 2mm increments, to bleeding cancellous bone; aim for 50 to 60 percent host-bone contact. Medialize to the anatomic centre if it improves contact. The final reamer is typically 4 to 6mm smaller than the planned cup.
  • Maintain 10 to 20 degrees anteversion while reaming β€” it is easy to drift into retroversion as the deficient anterosuperior rim is reamed away.
  • Multiple drill holes in the dome enhance biological fixation; avoid over-reaming, which compromises screw purchase.
Step 9Manage segmental rim defects with augments
  • Trial a trabecular metal wedge (commonly 30 to 50mm; a 45-degree or 60-degree augment) sized to fill the defect without proud overhang β€” a superior rim defect takes an oblique wedge, a posterosuperior defect a 45-degree augment.
  • Fix with 3 to 4 divergent screws per augment; pack morcellized bone graft behind it to enhance biological incorporation, and place NO cement at the bone-metal interface (it blocks ingrowth).
  • Place and fix the augment FIRST, then trial cups against it β€” the augment position determines the final cup orientation. Several small augments with independent fixation are preferable to one large wedge.
Step 10Impaction bone graft cavitary defects
  • Morcellized fresh-frozen allograft (5 to 10mm particles), with autograft from the femoral head if available, mixed with bone-marrow aspirate to enhance biology.
  • Impaction grafting requires a CONTAINED defect β€” if the medial wall is deficient, add mesh or an augment to contain the graft first, or it will extrude into the pelvis.
  • Sequential impaction with a reverse-reaming technique; typical volume 20 to 60mL with slight over-packing for the expected 20 percent consolidation. This reconstitutes bone stock for future revisions.
Step 11Trial the jumbo cup & set orientation
  • Insert the trial cup at the target orientation β€” 35 to 45 degrees inclination and 15 to 25 degrees anteversion (operative) β€” and verify 50 to 60 percent host-bone contact and that no augment or bone impinges.
  • Rock the trial in all directions; it must be rigid with no gross motion (micromotion less than 150 microns is acceptable). If unstable, add screws, add augments, or upsize.
  • Computer navigation helps but is not mandatory; intraoperative fluoroscopy verifies position. Acceptable to leave a superior deficiency if augments are used and screw fixation is adequate β€” fixation is by peripheral hoop stress plus screws, not complete bony coverage.
Step 12Place screws in the safe zones
  • Superior dome (10 to 2 o'clock): the best bone β€” 2 to 3 screws into the superior ilium, 30 to 40mm, converging toward the sacroiliac joint for maximum purchase.
  • Posterior column (7 to 9 o'clock): screws into the ischium and posterior column, 25 to 35mm, for rotational stability (at least 2 ischial screws).
  • AVOID the anterior column (2 to 4 o'clock β€” the external iliac vessels lie 10 to 20mm from the inner table) and the posteroinferior quadrant (5 to 7 o'clock β€” the sciatic nerve). Minimum 4 to 6 screws for a jumbo cup, 6.5mm diameter, using a drill-stop technique and aiming for bicortical purchase with at least 20mm intraosseous length.
Step 13Implant the final jumbo cup
  • Align the cup with the planned orientation marks and seat it with sequential mallet impacts distributed around the periphery β€” central impacts cause rim deformation or fracture.
  • Seat until the rim is flush with native bone, maintaining version carefully during the final blows (a jumbo cup is hard to remove once seated). It must be completely rigid to manual stress; if not, remove, upsize 2mm, and re-insert.
  • Insert all planned screws finger-tight then a quarter-turn (avoid over-tightening); locking screws if available prevent backout. Verify no prominent screw heads that could impinge the liner.
Step 14Liner, trial reduction & closure
  • Clean the taper thoroughly and seat the liner β€” almost always a dual mobility liner in revision (effective head 36 to 40mm); verify full seating and locking-mechanism engagement and a minimum polyethylene thickness of 6 to 8mm.
  • Trial reduction: assess flexion 90 degrees, internal rotation 30 degrees, external rotation 45 degrees, and FAdIR stress; shuck less than 1cm; accept 5 to 10mm overlengthening for the soft-tissue tension that enhances stability.
  • Final head and reduction, posterior capsular repair to the external rotators with #2 non-absorbable suture, gluteus maximus repair to fascia lata, and a tension-free abductor repair. Deep drain 24 to 48h, layered closure, sterile occlusive dressing; an abduction brace if stability is a concern.
Screw safe zones β€” the critical safety step

Place screws only in the superior dome (10 to 2 o'clock) and posterior column (7 to 9 o'clock). Anterior-column screws risk the external iliac vessels (10 to 20mm from the inner table) and posteroinferior screws risk the sciatic nerve. Use a drill-stop technique for every screw (set 3 to 5mm short of the desired length), aim for bicortical purchase, and verify depth and trajectory with fluoroscopy when bone loss is severe. Anterior screws should be limited to a maximum 25 to 30mm depth.

Do not miss a pelvic discontinuity

Before committing to a jumbo cup, stress-test the columns by levering on the ischium. Independent motion of the ilium is a pelvic discontinuity (Type IIIB) β€” a jumbo cup will fail here. Convert to a reconstruction cage, a cup-cage construct, or a custom triflange implant. Unrecognized discontinuity is a leading cause of early revision failure.

Sciatic nerve
Where it lies
Exits the greater sciatic notch 10 to 20mm posterior to the posterior column, then 15mm lateral to the ischial tuberosity
How to protect it
Identify early by palpation; keep a retractor on the lesser trochanter; avoid combined hip flexion and posterior retraction; consider monitoring for extensive posterior work
Superior gluteal neurovascular bundle
Where it lies
Exits the pelvis through the suprapiriform foramen 30 to 40mm above the acetabular rim, between gluteus medius and minimus
How to protect it
Stay distal to the gluteus medius insertion; limit superior dissection to 4 to 5cm above the rim; position retractors carefully
External iliac vessels
Where it lies
10 to 20mm medial to the pelvic brim along iliopsoas; at risk from medial wall perforation or anterior-column screws
How to protect it
Drill-stop for all anterior screws (max 25 to 30mm); avoid medial protrusion; confirm trajectory on preoperative CT and with fluoroscopy
Obturator neurovascular bundle
Where it lies
Along the obturator foramen 15 to 25mm medial to the quadrilateral plate; at risk during ischial screws and medial reaming
How to protect it
Direct ischial screws posteroinferiorly away from the foramen; limit medial reaming depth; keep instruments off the quadrilateral plate
Femoral neurovascular bundle
Where it lies
20 to 30mm inferior and medial to the AIIS along iliopsoas; at risk in anterior approaches and anterior-column screws
How to protect it
Gentle medial retraction; verify anterior screw length (max 30mm); maintain capsule integrity where possible
Critical danger structures in acetabular revision
StructureWhere it liesHow to protect it
Sciatic nerveExits the greater sciatic notch 10 to 20mm posterior to the posterior column, then 15mm lateral to the ischial tuberosityIdentify early by palpation; keep a retractor on the lesser trochanter; avoid combined hip flexion and posterior retraction; consider monitoring for extensive posterior work
Superior gluteal neurovascular bundleExits the pelvis through the suprapiriform foramen 30 to 40mm above the acetabular rim, between gluteus medius and minimusStay distal to the gluteus medius insertion; limit superior dissection to 4 to 5cm above the rim; position retractors carefully
External iliac vessels10 to 20mm medial to the pelvic brim along iliopsoas; at risk from medial wall perforation or anterior-column screwsDrill-stop for all anterior screws (max 25 to 30mm); avoid medial protrusion; confirm trajectory on preoperative CT and with fluoroscopy
Obturator neurovascular bundleAlong the obturator foramen 15 to 25mm medial to the quadrilateral plate; at risk during ischial screws and medial reamingDirect ischial screws posteroinferiorly away from the foramen; limit medial reaming depth; keep instruments off the quadrilateral plate
Femoral neurovascular bundle20 to 30mm inferior and medial to the AIIS along iliopsoas; at risk in anterior approaches and anterior-column screwsGentle medial retraction; verify anterior screw length (max 30mm); maintain capsule integrity where possible
Jumbo cup sizing and press-fit

A typical progression is 60mm extracted cup to a 66mm final reamer to a 70mm cup β€” the 4 to 6mm oversizing generates the hoop stress that gives initial stability, complemented by 4 to 6 screws clustered in the dome and ischium. Press-fit plus screws, not complete bony coverage, is the fixation mechanism.

Why dual mobility is standard in revision

Revision dislocation runs 10 to 25 percent with a standard bearing. A dual mobility liner enlarges the effective head to 36 to 40mm (increased jump distance) and drops that to 2 to 5 percent, with no increase in wear in modern designs β€” making it the first-line bearing in most acetabular revisions.

Aftercare & Complications


Rehabilitation | Phase | Timing | Weight-bearing & immobilisation | Therapy | |-------|--------|--------------------------------|---------| | 1 | 0 to 6 weeks | Toe-touch (10 to 15kg); strict toe-touch to 12 weeks for protected reconstructions (large defects, augments) | Gait training, active-assisted ROM, isometric gluteals; precautions education | | 2 | 6 to 12 weeks | Partial weight-bearing 50 percent (longer if protected) | Active ROM all planes, resistance bands, pool therapy | | 3 | 12 to 16+ weeks | Full weight-bearing once ingrowth confirmed radiographically | Progressive resistance, gait normalisation, return to ADLs | | Long term | β€” | Avoid high-impact sport permanently | Annual clinical and radiographic surveillance | Most patients return to desk work by 6 to 12 weeks. Heterotopic-ossification prophylaxis for high-risk patients is indomethacin 75mg daily for 6 weeks OR a single 700cGy radiation dose within 72 hours. Hip precautions. Posterior approach (12 weeks minimum): no flexion more than 90 degrees, no adduction past midline, no internal rotation past neutral. Anterior approach (6 to 12 weeks): no extension past neutral, no external rotation past 45 degrees, no combined extension-external rotation. Thromboprophylaxis. LMWH (enoxaparin 40mg daily) or rivaroxaban 10mg daily for 35 days (extended duration for revision), with mechanical sequential compression until ambulatory; aspirin alone is insufficient for revision surgery. Radiographic monitoring. Immediate postoperative baseline (component position, leg length, any intraoperative fracture), 6 weeks (early subsidence), 12 weeks (confirm stability before weight-bearing progression), 6 months, 1 year, then annually. Red flags: subsidence more than 2mm, progressive radiolucent lines, component migration or rotation, new osteolysis. Complications

Aseptic loosening (5 to 15 percent at 10 years)
Recognition
Progressive groin pain on weight-bearing; migration more than 2mm superior or medial; radiolucent lines in all zones; tilt or rotation on serial films
Prevention
50 to 60 percent host-bone contact; 4 to 6 screws in the dome and ischium; 4 to 6mm oversizing; impaction grafting for cavitary defects; optimize nutrition, smoking, metabolic bone disease
Management
Serial monitoring if asymptomatic; re-revision if symptomatic β€” larger jumbo cup if stock allows, trabecular metal cup or augments, or a cage/triflange for worse deficiency
Dislocation (10 to 25 percent without dual mobility; 2 to 5 percent with)
Recognition
Acute pain, shortened rotated limb, unable to bear weight; posterior in 70 to 80 percent; film to confirm direction and component position
Prevention
Dual mobility liner in high-risk patients; cup at 35 to 45 degrees inclination and 15 to 25 degrees anteversion; head at least 32 to 36mm; meticulous posterior soft-tissue repair; abduction brace
Management
Closed reduction under sedation for a first dislocation, CT after to assess version and impingement, abduction brace 12 weeks; revision (liner exchange to dual mobility/constrained, femoral revision if version abnormal) if recurrent
Periprosthetic infection (3 to 8 percent)
Recognition
Drainage beyond 7 days, fever, erythema; ESR more than 30 or CRP more than 10; synovial WBC more than 3000; sinus tract
Prevention
Optimize A1c (less than 7 percent), albumin, weight; IV antibiotics within 60 minutes; normothermia; minimize operative time; chlorhexidine prep; antibiotic cement if high risk
Management
Early (less than 3 weeks): debridement, antibiotics and liner exchange. Chronic: two-stage exchange with a 6-week spacer, 2-week antibiotic holiday, then reimplantation; lifelong suppression or Girdlestone as salvage
Sciatic nerve palsy (1 to 3 percent)
Recognition
Foot drop (common peroneal division most vulnerable), numb dorsal foot, weak eversion; check on emergence; EMG at 3 to 4 weeks
Prevention
Minimize lengthening (less than 4cm); careful posterior retractor placement; release scarred tissue; avoid prolonged surgery; consider monitoring
Management
Immediate AFO to prevent equinus contracture; therapy; nerve conduction studies at 3 to 4 weeks; 60 to 80 percent recover substantially by 12 months; nerve exploration/transfer if no recovery at 9 to 12 months
Vascular injury (less than 1 percent but catastrophic)
Recognition
Bleeding uncontrolled by usual measures, expanding pelvic/thigh haematoma, haemodynamic instability, dropping haemoglobin, reduced distal pulses
Prevention
Screw safe zones only; drill-stop technique; CT screw planning; avoid forceful medial reaming (iliac vessels 10 to 20mm from inner table)
Management
Immediate vascular surgery call; massive-transfusion protocol; angiography with embolization for venous bleeding; open repair for arterial injury; correct coagulopathy; return to theatre for washout
Pelvic discontinuity (intraoperative 1 to 5 percent)
Recognition
Crack on reaming or impaction; independent motion of the columns on palpation; acute rotation; inability to obtain a stable cup
Prevention
Recognize risk (osteoporosis, large osteolytic defects, thin columns); gentle sequential reaming; avoid excessive medialization; controlled peripheral impaction; consider prophylactic plating
Management
Intraoperative recognition: convert to a cage or cup-cage with supplemental plating and protected weight-bearing 12 weeks. Postoperative recognition: revise to a custom triflange, distraction cup-cage, or column plating with grafting
Major complications of acetabular revision with a jumbo cup
ComplicationRecognitionPreventionManagement
Aseptic loosening (5 to 15 percent at 10 years)Progressive groin pain on weight-bearing; migration more than 2mm superior or medial; radiolucent lines in all zones; tilt or rotation on serial films50 to 60 percent host-bone contact; 4 to 6 screws in the dome and ischium; 4 to 6mm oversizing; impaction grafting for cavitary defects; optimize nutrition, smoking, metabolic bone diseaseSerial monitoring if asymptomatic; re-revision if symptomatic β€” larger jumbo cup if stock allows, trabecular metal cup or augments, or a cage/triflange for worse deficiency
Dislocation (10 to 25 percent without dual mobility; 2 to 5 percent with)Acute pain, shortened rotated limb, unable to bear weight; posterior in 70 to 80 percent; film to confirm direction and component positionDual mobility liner in high-risk patients; cup at 35 to 45 degrees inclination and 15 to 25 degrees anteversion; head at least 32 to 36mm; meticulous posterior soft-tissue repair; abduction braceClosed reduction under sedation for a first dislocation, CT after to assess version and impingement, abduction brace 12 weeks; revision (liner exchange to dual mobility/constrained, femoral revision if version abnormal) if recurrent
Periprosthetic infection (3 to 8 percent)Drainage beyond 7 days, fever, erythema; ESR more than 30 or CRP more than 10; synovial WBC more than 3000; sinus tractOptimize A1c (less than 7 percent), albumin, weight; IV antibiotics within 60 minutes; normothermia; minimize operative time; chlorhexidine prep; antibiotic cement if high riskEarly (less than 3 weeks): debridement, antibiotics and liner exchange. Chronic: two-stage exchange with a 6-week spacer, 2-week antibiotic holiday, then reimplantation; lifelong suppression or Girdlestone as salvage
Sciatic nerve palsy (1 to 3 percent)Foot drop (common peroneal division most vulnerable), numb dorsal foot, weak eversion; check on emergence; EMG at 3 to 4 weeksMinimize lengthening (less than 4cm); careful posterior retractor placement; release scarred tissue; avoid prolonged surgery; consider monitoringImmediate AFO to prevent equinus contracture; therapy; nerve conduction studies at 3 to 4 weeks; 60 to 80 percent recover substantially by 12 months; nerve exploration/transfer if no recovery at 9 to 12 months
Vascular injury (less than 1 percent but catastrophic)Bleeding uncontrolled by usual measures, expanding pelvic/thigh haematoma, haemodynamic instability, dropping haemoglobin, reduced distal pulsesScrew safe zones only; drill-stop technique; CT screw planning; avoid forceful medial reaming (iliac vessels 10 to 20mm from inner table)Immediate vascular surgery call; massive-transfusion protocol; angiography with embolization for venous bleeding; open repair for arterial injury; correct coagulopathy; return to theatre for washout
Pelvic discontinuity (intraoperative 1 to 5 percent)Crack on reaming or impaction; independent motion of the columns on palpation; acute rotation; inability to obtain a stable cupRecognize risk (osteoporosis, large osteolytic defects, thin columns); gentle sequential reaming; avoid excessive medialization; controlled peripheral impaction; consider prophylactic platingIntraoperative recognition: convert to a cage or cup-cage with supplemental plating and protected weight-bearing 12 weeks. Postoperative recognition: revise to a custom triflange, distraction cup-cage, or column plating with grafting

Other complications. Heterotopic ossification in 20 to 40 percent (higher in revision, trauma, prior HO β€” prophylaxis as above; excise if symptomatic and mature beyond 12 months); leg-length inequality (5 to 10mm overlengthening is acceptable for stability, shoe-lift if more than 15mm); chronic pain (exclude infection and loosening first, then multimodal management, gabapentinoids for neurogenic pain); and dual-mobility liner dissociation (rare with modern designs, presents as instability or clicking, needs liner revision).

Viva & Exam Focus


Mnemonic

JUMBOJUMBO β€” when to choose a jumbo cup

J
Joint centre
Superior migration less than 3cm allows anatomic reconstruction
U
Uncompromised columns
Intact anterior and posterior columns required for stability
M
Medial wall
Sufficient stock; minor defects acceptable with impaction grafting
B
Bone contact
50 to 60 percent host-bone contact achievable with hemispherical reaming
O
Osteolysis pattern
Contained or segmental defects amenable to augmentation β€” not a pelvic discontinuity
Mnemonic

SCREWSCREW β€” principles of screw fixation in jumbo cups

S
Superior dome
Best bone β€” 2 to 3 screws into the ilium above the dome
C
Convergent trajectories
Converge toward the sacroiliac joint for maximum purchase
R
Retroacetabular bone
Ischial screws into the thick posterior column give rotational stability
E
Evaluate safe zones
Avoid the anterior column (vessels) and posteroinferior quadrant (sciatic nerve)
W
Working length
Bicortical purchase ideal; at least 20mm intraosseous for meaningful fixation

Clinical Decision Scenarios

Practise clinical reasoning and management decisions out loud

Viva scenarioStandard
Clinical prompt

β€œYou are revising a failed acetabular component 8 years after primary THA. Radiographs show 2.5cm superior migration and loss of the anterosuperior rim, but Kohler's line appears intact. After component removal there is a large superolateral defect with cavitary bone loss medially. Walk me through your reconstruction of this Paprosky IIIA defect.”

Viva scenarioStandard
Clinical prompt

β€œPostoperative day 1 after acetabular revision with a jumbo cup, the nurses report a foot drop. You confirm the patient cannot dorsiflex the ankle and has numbness over the dorsum of the foot. What is the differential, how do you assess this patient, and what is your management?”

Viva scenarioStandard
Clinical prompt

β€œYou are revising a 68-year-old's acetabular component for aseptic loosening 12 years after primary THA. The CT shows a Paprosky Type IIA defect β€” moderate cavitary loss but intact columns and rim. How do you plan bone-defect management, and how do you decide between a jumbo cup, a trabecular metal cup with augments, or another technique?”

Exam day cheat sheet
THA Revision - Acetabular Component (Jumbo Cup/Augments) - exam essentials

Indications & classification

  • Paprosky II and IIIA with intact columns and an intact Kohler's line are suitable for a jumbo cup
  • Type IIIB (more than 3cm migration or pelvic discontinuity) is NOT β€” needs a cage, cup-cage or custom triflange
  • Type IIA cavitary, IIB medial wall, IIC superior/lateral; IIIA rim defect with columns intact
  • Also: recurrent instability, metallosis, progressive osteolysis, failed constrained liner

Jumbo cup principles

  • Definition (Mayo): at least 62mm women, at least 66mm men; or at least 10mm larger than the contralateral acetabulum (Gustke)
  • 50 to 60 percent host-bone contact minimum β€” medialize to the anatomic centre if needed
  • Press-fit via hoop stress: sequential 2mm reaming, final reamer 4 to 6mm smaller than the cup
  • At least 4 to 6 supplemental screws in the dome and ischium; safe zones are superior dome and posterior column

Augments & graft

  • Trabecular metal augments for segmental rim defects β€” fix with 3 to 4 screws, pack graft behind, no cement at the interface
  • Impaction bone grafting for cavitary defects β€” morcellized allograft 5 to 10mm, contained cavity only (mesh if medial wall deficient)
  • Place and fix the augment first β€” it sets the final cup orientation
  • Several small augments beat one large wedge; pack graft behind to reconstitute stock

Critical danger zones

  • Sciatic nerve: 10 to 20mm behind the posterior column β€” avoid posterior retraction with the hip extended
  • Superior gluteal bundle: 30 to 40mm above the rim β€” limit superior dissection to less than 5cm
  • External iliac vessels: 10 to 20mm medial to the pelvic brim β€” anterior screws max 25 to 30mm with a drill-stop
  • Obturator bundle: 15 to 25mm medial to the quadrilateral plate β€” direct ischial screws away

Screw fixation

  • At least 4 to 6 screws; cluster in the superior dome (best bone) and ischium (rotational stability)
  • Drill-stop technique: set 3 to 5mm short of the desired length
  • Bicortical purchase ideal; at least 20mm intraosseous
  • Converge dome screws toward the sacroiliac joint; fluoroscopy to verify depth

Liner & stability

  • Dual mobility is standard in revision β€” dislocation drops from 10 to 15 percent to 2 to 5 percent
  • Effective head 36 to 40mm; constrained liner only as a last resort
  • Cemented polyethylene into the shell if ingrowth is uncertain
  • Cup position: 35 to 45 degrees inclination, 15 to 25 degrees anteversion

Complications

  • Aseptic loosening 5 to 15 percent at 10 years β€” prevent with contact, screws, press-fit, graft
  • Dislocation 10 to 25 percent (2 to 5 percent with dual mobility)
  • Infection 3 to 8 percent β€” two-stage exchange for chronic, DAIR for early (less than 3 weeks)
  • Sciatic palsy 1 to 3 percent β€” AFO immediately; 60 to 80 percent recover by 12 months

Postoperative protocol

  • Weight-bearing: toe-touch 6 to 12 weeks, partial to 16 weeks, full once ingrowth is confirmed
  • Posterior precautions 12 weeks: no flexion more than 90 degrees, no adduction, no internal rotation
  • DVT prophylaxis: LMWH or rivaroxaban for 35 days
  • Radiographs: baseline, 6 and 12 weeks, 6 months, 1 year, then annually; subsidence more than 2mm is a red flag

Background & Evidence


Why acetabula fail. Aseptic loosening and periprosthetic osteolysis driven by polyethylene wear are the leading reasons for revision THA. Particle debris from the bearing generates a macrophage-mediated inflammatory response that resorbs periprosthetic bone; as bone is lost the cup migrates, the hip centre moves superiorly and medially, and the columns and medial wall may be progressively compromised. The degree and pattern of that bone loss is what the Paprosky classification captures, and it is the single most important determinant of which reconstruction is possible. The Paprosky framework grades the defect on three radiographic signs β€” the degree of superior migration of the hip centre, the integrity of Kohler's line (the medial wall), and the presence of the teardrop and ischial osteolysis β€” supplemented intraoperatively by palpation of the columns. The classification is the lens for the whole operation because it dictates whether a biologically fixed jumbo cup is viable or whether the defect has outgrown it.

I
Features
Intact bone stock with minor contained defects
Typical reconstruction
Standard cementless cup
IIA
Features
Superior and medial intact, cavitary defects, migration less than 2cm
Typical reconstruction
Cup plus impaction grafting (jumbo cup if 50 to 60 percent contact needs oversizing)
IIB
Features
Medial wall compromised, superior migration less than 2cm
Typical reconstruction
Jumbo cup plus graft; mesh if the medial wall is deficient
IIC
Features
Moderate superior and lateral defects
Typical reconstruction
Jumbo cup plus augments
IIIA
Features
Migration 2 to 3cm, rim defect, columns and Kohler intact, less than 50 percent stock
Typical reconstruction
Jumbo cup plus augments and graft plus multiple screws
IIIB
Features
Migration more than 3cm or pelvic discontinuity, Kohler disrupted
Typical reconstruction
NOT a jumbo cup β€” cage, cup-cage, or custom triflange
Paprosky classification of acetabular bone defects
TypeFeaturesTypical reconstruction
IIntact bone stock with minor contained defectsStandard cementless cup
IIASuperior and medial intact, cavitary defects, migration less than 2cmCup plus impaction grafting (jumbo cup if 50 to 60 percent contact needs oversizing)
IIBMedial wall compromised, superior migration less than 2cmJumbo cup plus graft; mesh if the medial wall is deficient
IICModerate superior and lateral defectsJumbo cup plus augments
IIIAMigration 2 to 3cm, rim defect, columns and Kohler intact, less than 50 percent stockJumbo cup plus augments and graft plus multiple screws
IIIBMigration more than 3cm or pelvic discontinuity, Kohler disruptedNOT a jumbo cup β€” cage, cup-cage, or custom triflange

Key evidence. Paprosky's seminal 1994 paper established the classification and showed that of 147 revised cups only 6 (4 percent) were unstable and all were Type IIIB β€” adequate host bone is the prerequisite for ingrowth. The jumbo cup's durability is confirmed across series: Lachiewicz and Soileau reported 97.3 percent survival free of loosening at 10 years and 82.8 percent at 15 years (dislocation 9.3 percent the dominant failure, reduced by a head of at least 32mm); Gustke reported 98 percent survivorship at 4 years and 96 percent at 16 years with Harris hip score rising from 44 to 72; and von Roth's twenty-year follow-up showed 88 percent free of aseptic loosening. Sporer and Paprosky defined the limit β€” once a pelvic discontinuity is present, a trabecular metal cup with augment or a cage is needed, not a hemispheric jumbo cup alone β€” a message reinforced by Berry's pelvic-discontinuity work (82 percent union with distraction and plating) and Kosashvili's cup-cage series. Guyen established dual mobility as the standard bearing to control instability in revision, cutting redislocation to a fraction.

References


Evidence

Acetabular defect classification and surgical reconstruction in revision arthroplasty: a 6-year follow-up evaluation

Paprosky WG, Perona PG, Lawrence JM β€’ Journal of Arthroplasty (1994)
Verify on PubMed (PMID 8163974)

Seminal paper establishing the Paprosky classification from superior migration, ischial and teardrop lysis, and Kohler's line integrity. Of 147 cementless press-fit revisions (mean follow-up 5.7 years) only 6 (4 percent) were unstable, and all 6 were Type IIIB with the greatest segmental rim loss β€” adequate remaining host bone is required for cup ingrowth.

Evidence

Fixation, survival, and dislocation of jumbo acetabular components in revision hip arthroplasty

Lachiewicz PF, Soileau ES β€’ Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American) (2013)
Verify on PubMed (PMID 23515989)

129 revision THAs with jumbo cups (Mayo definition: at least 62mm women, at least 66mm men) and screw fixation. Survival free of loosening was 97.3 percent at 10 years and 82.8 percent at 15 years; only 3.1 percent were removed for infection and 3.1 percent for aseptic loosening. Dislocation (9.3 percent) was the commonest complication and was reduced by a femoral head of at least 32mm.

Evidence

Use of jumbo cups for revision of acetabulae with large bony defects

Gustke KA, Levering MF, Miranda MA β€’ Journal of Arthroplasty (2014)
Verify on PubMed (PMID 23993345)

196 jumbo cups in 186 patients (at least 62mm women, at least 66mm men, or at least 10mm larger than the contralateral acetabulum) at a mean 10-year follow-up. A porous cup with supplemental screws achieved 98 percent survivorship at 4 years and 96 percent at 16 years, with Harris hip score improving from 44 to 72 β€” supporting the porous jumbo cup as the workhorse for large contained defects.

Evidence

Uncemented jumbo cups for revision total hip arthroplasty: a concise follow-up at a mean of twenty years

von Roth P, Abdel MP, Harmsen WS, Berry DJ β€’ Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American) (2015)
Verify on PubMed (PMID 25695978)

Twenty-year follow-up of uncemented jumbo cups: 88 percent free of aseptic loosening and 83 percent free of revision of the metal shell for any reason, justifying the jumbo cup as a durable standard for acetabular revision despite limited bone-stock restoration.

Evidence

Acetabular revision using a trabecular metal acetabular component for severe bone loss associated with a pelvic discontinuity

Sporer SM, Paprosky WG β€’ Journal of Arthroplasty (2006)
Verify on PubMed (PMID 16950068)

13 hips with Paprosky Type IIIB defects and pelvic discontinuity reconstructed with a trabecular metal cup with or without augment; fixation was obtained proximal and distal to the discontinuity. At a mean 2.6 years only 1 of 13 showed possible radiographic loosening β€” defining the limit of the jumbo cup: once a discontinuity is present, porous tantalum or a cage bridges it.

Evidence

Use of a dual mobility socket to manage total hip arthroplasty instability

Guyen O, Pibarot V, Vaz G, Chevillotte C, Bejui-Hugues J β€’ Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research (2009)
Verify on PubMed (PMID 18780135)

54 unstable or high-risk arthroplasties managed with an unconstrained dual mobility socket; at a mean of 4 years only 1 redislocated (closed reduction) and 2 needed revision for intraprosthetic dissociation from technical error. The enlarged effective head diameter increases jump distance and restores stability, supporting dual mobility as a first-line revision bearing.

Evidence

Pelvic discontinuity in revision total hip arthroplasty

Berry DJ, Lewallen DG, Hanssen AD, Cabanela ME β€’ Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American) (1999)
Verify on PubMed (PMID 10608380)

Landmark paper on pelvic-discontinuity management β€” the distraction technique with supplemental plating achieved union in 82 percent with a protected weight-bearing protocol, defining how a recognized discontinuity is salvaged when a jumbo cup is not viable.

Evidence

Acetabular revision using an anti-protrusion (ilio-ischial) cage and trabecular metal acetabular component for severe bone loss with pelvic discontinuity

Kosashvili Y, Backstein D, Safir O, Lakstein D, Gross AE β€’ Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (British) (2009)
Verify on PubMed (PMID 19567849)

Component-cage (cup-cage) construct for pelvic discontinuity combining the biological fixation of trabecular metal with the structural support of a cage β€” 88.5 percent free of loosening at a mean 44.6 months, validating the hybrid reconstruction for IIIB defects.

Evidence

The management of severe acetabular bone loss using structural allograft and acetabular reinforcement devices

Gill TJ, Sledge JB, Muller ME β€’ Journal of Arthroplasty (2000)
Verify on PubMed (PMID 10654455)

37 reconstructions for major structural pelvic bone loss using bulk allograft covering more than 50 percent of the socket protected by a reinforcement device β€” 91.9 percent clinical success and 97.3 percent allograft incorporation at 7.1 years, with superior cup migration virtually eliminated.

Evidence

Classification and reconstruction in revision acetabular arthroplasty with bone stock deficiency

Garbuz D, Morsi E, Mohamed N, Gross AE β€’ Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research (1996)
Verify on PubMed (PMID 8595782)

Defines a contained versus non-contained defect classification and shows 90 percent success with morsellised allograft for contained defects; structural grafts should achieve more than 50 percent host support, otherwise a roof-reinforcement ring with a cemented cup is preferred.

Editorially reviewed β€” transparent references and correction processPublished by OrthoVellum Medical Education TeamEditorial boardMethodologyReview policy
Educational disclosure

Educational content is reviewed for source visibility, editorial coherence, and correction readiness.

No individual clinician credential is claimed unless a named person is shown.

Verify before clinical use; this is not medical advice or a substitute for local guidance.

Procedure console
28
Read
0
Sections
intermediate
Level
Peer-reviewed Β· 2026-06-20
Procedure info
Level
intermediate
Read time
28
Updated
2026-06-20
SURGICAL APPROACHES USED
Hip Posterior Approach (Moore/Southern)
Browse all procedures